- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from School Mental Health
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Incorporating Well-Adjusted Peers in a Conduct Problems
Prevention Program: Evaluation of Acceptability, Fidelity,
and Safety of Implementation
Joel M. Hektner
1
•Alison L. Brennan
1
•Gerald J. August
2
Published online: 25 October 2016
ÓSpringer Science+Business Media New York 2016
Abstract In order to prevent iatrogenic effects associated
with interventions that aggregate youth with behavior
problems and to promote the integration of these youth into
normative peer groups, a comprehensive evidence-based
prevention program, Early Risers ‘‘Skills for Success’’
(August et al. in Preventing substance abuse: science-based
programs for children and adolescents, American Psycho-
logical Association, Washington, 2007), was augmented to
include well-adjusted children in a strategic peer affiliation
component, or buddy system. A total of 190 kindergartners
and first graders from five schools in a Midwestern US city
were randomly assigned by school to receive the program
or serve as controls. In the first summer program compo-
nent, the children received 72 h of programming in aca-
demics, social skills, and creative arts, all within a highly
structured social environment. The feasibility of the pro-
gram was investigated through examination of acceptabil-
ity, fidelity, and safety of programming, with special
attention to acceptability and safety for well-adjusted peer
mentors. Results showed that intervention fidelity, as
measured by independent observers, was high. Accept-
ability was high as well, with no differences in attendance
between well-adjusted children and children with behav-
ioral problems. There was no evidence of iatrogenic effects
or other unsafe outcomes: Peer-reported victimization did
not increase, and well-adjusted children did not increase in
aggression. In contrast, both well-adjusted children and
their peers with behavior problems increased in teacher-
rated social skills, and well-adjusted children increased in
leadership. The results suggest that the pairing of well-
adjusted children with behavior-problem children in a
highly structured program such as Early Risers is a feasible
program tactic in which the well-adjusted children may
also derive some benefit.
Keywords Preventive intervention Peer affiliation
Feasibility Peer mentoring
Introduction
Childhood social withdrawal and aggression have been
identified as strong predictors of later internalizing and
externalizing problems (Coie, Lochman, Terry, & Hyman,
1992; Moffitt, 1993). Aggressive or withdrawn children are
more likely than other children to experience peer rejec-
tion, and the experience of being rejected by peers inde-
pendently contributes to the development of more serious
and chronic problem behaviors including conduct disorder
(Coie et al., 1992; Miller-Johnson, Coie, Maumary-Gre-
maud, Bierman & The Conduct Problems Prevention
Research Group, 2002). As a result of rejection by
nonaggressive peers, aggressive children tend to affiliate
with one another, which is worrisome because aggressive
and inappropriate behaviors occur more often when chil-
dren associate with aggressive peers (Hektner, August, &
Realmuto, 2000). Withdrawn children also tend to affiliate
with one another, and when they do, their levels of vic-
timization and depression increase (Zhao, Chen, Ellis, &
Zarbatany, 2016). Thus, interventions must not only
address risk factors such as underlying skill deficits and
problem behaviors that contribute to rejection but also
should address protective factors such as planned activities
&Joel M. Hektner
joel.hektner@ndsu.edu
1
North Dakota State University, Dept. 2615,
PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
2
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
123
School Mental Health (2017) 9:66–77
DOI 10.1007/s12310-016-9199-7
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.