Pongo pygmaeus, Bornean orangutan

Full text

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
ISSN 2307-8235 (online)
IUCN 2008: T17975A17966347
Pongo pygmaeus, Bornean Orangutan
Assessment by: Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A.J., Meijaard, E., Wich ,
S.A. & Husson, S.
View on www.iucnredlist.org
Citation: Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A.J., Meijaard, E., Wich , S.A. & Husson, S. 2016. Pongo
pygmaeus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T17975A17966347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
Copyright: © 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written
permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written
permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN
Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife
International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London.
If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with
feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided.
THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™

Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Mammalia Primates Hominidae
Taxon Name:ÊÊPongo pygmaeus (Linnaeus, 1760)
Synonym(s):
• Simia pygmaeus Linnaeus, 1760
Infra-specific Taxa Assessed:
• Pongo pygmaeus ssp. morio
• Pongo pygmaeus ssp. pygmaeus
• Pongo pygmaeus ssp. wurmbii
Common Name(s):
• English: Bornean Orangutan
• French: Orang-outan de Bornéo
• Spanish: Orang-után
Taxonomic Source(s):
Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B. and Wilson D.E. 2013. Handbook of the Mammals of the World: Volume
3 Primates. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
Taxonomic Notes:
Although there is ongoing debate about the taxonomic status of the Bornean Orangutan (see review in
Goossens et al. 2009); three subspecies are currently recognized for the taxon:
P. p. pygmaeus: Northwest Bornean Orangutan:
• State of Sarawak (Malaysia)
• Province of West Kalimantan (Indonesia)
P. p. wurmbii: Southwest Bornean Orangutan:
• Province of West Kalimantan (Indonesia)
• Province of Central Kalimantan (Indonesia)
P. p. morio: Northeast Bornean Orangutan:
• State of Sabah (Malaysia)
• Province of North Kalimantan (Indonesia)
• Province of East Kalimantan (Indonesia)
Assessment Information
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
1

Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered A4abcd ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: February 8, 2016
Justification:
Bornean Orangutans are lowland forest specialists, rarely found above 500 m asl. In the 1950s, the
habitat suitable for orangutans extended across ~255,000 km² of the island of Borneo (see below).
The two major reasons why most Bornean Orangutans populations are in sharp decline are (1)
destruction, degradation and fragmentation of their habitats, and (2) hunting. Recurrent forest fires,
especially in peat forests, cause additional sharp declines about once every decade. Bornean
Orangutans decreased by more than 60% between 1950 and 2010, and a further 22% decline is
projected to occur between 2010 and 2025 (see below). Combined, this equates to a loss of more than
82% over 75 years, 1950–2025. Given that a Bornean Orangutan's generation length is ~25 years (Wich
et al. 2009), this decline will occur in a period of three generations. Each of the Pongo pygmaeus
subspecies is roughly equally affected. Only one comprehensive quantitative survey of Bornean
Orangutans has been conducted, in 2010, which prohibits quantitative assessment of changes in
numbers for most populations. Temporal changes in population status are therefore best assessed via
the proxies of habitat loss and hunting rates. A detailed rationale for a population decline of more than
86% between 1950 and 2025 follows.
The most accurate estimate of the geographic range of Bornean Orangutans showed that in 2010, 59.6%
of the forest remaining in Borneo was suitable habitat (155,106 km² of 260,109 km² of forest: Wich et al.
2012, Gaveau et al. 2014). Considering that in 1973, 75.7% of Borneo (424,753 km²) was under natural
forest (Gaveau et al. 2014), we estimate that 253,153 km² of forest was orangutan habitat at this time.
Mechanized logging in Borneo started in the early 1950s, and industrial logging and forest conversion
intensified in the late 1960s. The rate of forest conversion is difficult to estimate prior to 1973 due to the
lack of satellite imagery, but a recent spatial analysis evaluated forest persistence, clearance and logging
spanning the 37 years between 1973 and 2010 (Gaveau et al. 2014). We take the rate of forest loss
documented from 1973 to 2010 as conservative and de facto lower than if data were available from
1950.
1. Habitat loss and orangutan decline
During the period 1973–2010, 39% of Bornean forests were lost (Gaveau et al. 2014), representing a net
loss of 98,730 km² of prime orangutan habitat. It is estimated that a further 37% of suitable orangutan
habitat (155,106 km²) will be converted to plantations between 2010 and 2025, which accounts for the
loss of an additional 57,140 km² of orangutan habitat (Wich et al. 2012). Compared to the baseline
(253,153 km²), more than 155,867 km² or of 61.5% of orangutan habitat will be gone by 2025; see Table
1 in Supplementary Material.
The orangutan habitat remaining in 2010 (97,716 km²) was either protected or designated for timber
production (Wich et al. 2012). Nonetheless, forest loss is expected to occur here too, owing to fires,
encroachment and smallholder plantation development. Rates of forest loss measured at two sites with
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
2

the largest Borneo orangutan populations are: 1.9% per year (1991–2000) and 1.5% per year
(2000–2007) at Sebangau National Park (Husson et al. 2015); and 2.4% per year including the buffer
zone, or 1.1% excluding the buffer zone (1988–2002) at Gunung Palung National Park (Curran et al.
2004). The rate of loss in production forests outside formally protected areas will undoubtedly be higher
(Santika et al. 2015). Thus we conservatively estimate the ongoing rate of loss in this administrative type
of forest to be 1.5% per year. This will represent another 19,821 km² of forest lost between 2010 and
2025: 20.2% of the orangutan habitat in 2010, or 8.7% in 1973.
2. Habitat degradation and orangutan decline
In addition to habitat loss, selective logging has degraded 56% of Bornean Orangutan habitat since 1973
(Gaveau et al. 2014). The impacts of logging on orangutan density are variable, from little change in
lightly-logged forest to major negative impacts in heavily-logged forest (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). For
example, selective artisanal logging reduced orangutan densities in peat-swamp forests by 21–30%
(Husson et al. 2009), while mechanised logging in dryland forests is presumed to have a greater impact.
Thus, 56% of the Bornean Orangutan range could undergo a 20% decrease in carrying capacity. This
estimate is conservative, considering that in Kalimantan the total area of natural forest allocated for
timber extraction is increasing. Reduction in carrying capacity due to logging would then equate to a
loss of 7% of the 1973 population by 2010, and overall accounts for 4% of the total projected 1973–2025
population decline.
3. Hunting and orangutan decline
The widespread impacts of illegal hunting had not been quantified prior to a major questionnaire study
throughout Kalimantan in 2008–2009 (Meijaard et al. 2011). The authors estimated that 630–1,357
Bornean Orangutans were killed in 2008 and that an average of 2,383–3,882 per year had been killed
during the lifetimes of the survey respondents. The mean estimate (2,256 orangutans poached in
Kalimantan each year) equates to 2.6% of the 2010 population for Kalimantan. Population losses due to
hunting may be partially offset by population growth, which has a maximum theoretical rate of 2%
annually (Marshall et al, 2009). The only study to have measured growth in a Bornean Orangutan
population was carried out in Sebangau National Park in a population recovering from a logging-induced
crash. Here, growth was relatively uninhibited and estimated to increase at an average annual rate of
1.6% between 2001 and 2013 (Husson et al. 2015). It is highly unlikely that a continuously-hunted
population could recover at this rate, but in order to take into account uncertainties in determining the
level of hunting, a 1.5% growth rate is applied, resulting in a net population decrease due to hunting of
1.1% annually. This equates to an additional loss (once habitat clearance and impacts of logging are
factored in) of 18% of the 1973 population by 2010 and 7% of the 2010 population by 2025. Overall,
poaching contributes 12% to the estimated 1973–2025 population decrease.
The combined impacts of habitat loss, habitat degradation and illegal hunting equate to an 86%
population reduction between 1973 and 2025 which qualifies the species for listing as Critically
Endangered. This estimate is relatively conservative, as it does not include additional future population
losses anticipated due to stochastic effects that will reduce populations inhabiting increasingly small
forest fragments.
Orangutan habitat loss and killing were already significant threats during the period 1950–1973, and the
species was already declining at this time. However the paucity of data for this period prevents to
estimate a specific rate of population decline for this specific period of time. However, if we assume that
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
3

orangutan abundance in 1950 was similar to that in 1973 (which is not the case because any declines
that occurred between 1950 and 1973 are not accounted for), our analysis shows that the species will
suffer a more than 80% decline in three generations (1950–2025).
For further information about this species, see Supplementary Material.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
2008 – Endangered (EN) – http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T17975A7640635.en
2007 – Endangered (EN)
2000 – Endangered (EN)
1996 – Vulnerable (VU)
1994 – Endangered (E)
1990 – Endangered (E)
1988 – Endangered (E)
1986 – Endangered (E)
1965 – Very rare and believed to be decreasing in numbers
Geographic Range
Range Description:
The Bornean Orangutan is endemic to the island of Borneo where it is present in both the Malaysian
states of Sabah and Sarawak, as well as in four of the five Indonesian Provinces of Kalimantan: North,
East, Central and West Kalimantan. The distribution of Bornean Orangutans is highly patchy throughout
the island; they are apparently absent or uncommon in the southeast, the forests between the Rejang
River in central Sarawak, and the Padas River in western Sabah (including the Sultanate of Brunei). The
Bornean Orangutan occurs preferentially in lowland forests below 500 m asl, but some individuals can
also be found in highland habitats, for example, up to 1,500 m asl in Kinabalu National Park. Large rivers
are natural barriers that are impassable to these animals and limit their dispersal (Goossens et al. 2005).
Country Occurrence:
Native: Indonesia (Kalimantan); Malaysia (Sabah, Sarawak)
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
4

Distribution Map
Pongo pygmaeus
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
5

Population
Climatic change and human pressure have resulted in significant reductions in the range and numbers of
Bornean Orangutans during the recent historic past (Goossens et al. 2006, Meijaard et al. 2010).
The total number of orangutans in Borneo is not precisely known, except for Sabah, where
comprehensive aerial surveys in the early 2000s provided an estimate of 11,000 individuals for the
entire State (Ancrenaz et al. 2005). The most recent (2004) estimate for the species is that c. 55,000
Bornean Orangutans inhabit 82,000 km² of forest (Wich et al. 2008). However, using modelling and the
latest field data available for Borneo, a revised map of their current distribution gives a larger range
estimate of 155,000 km², or 21% of Borneo’s landmass (Wich et al. 2012). If the mean average
orangutan density recorded in 2004 (0.67 individuals/km²) is applied to the updated geographic range,
then the total population estimate would be 104,700 individuals. This represents a decline from an
estimated 288,500 individuals in 1973 and is projected to decline further to 47,000 individuals by 2025.
Compounding loss of habitat, recent interview surveys in Kalimantan have concluded that 2,000–3,000
orangutans were killed every year in Indonesian Borneo during the past four decades alone (Meijaard et
al. 2011). This would represent a loss of 44,170–66,570 individuals (Davis et al. 2013), or more than 50%
of the original population in just 40 years. Such a rate of killings is unsustainable (Marshall et al. 2009)
and many populations will be reduced or become extinct in the next 50 years (Abram et al. 2015).
Current Population Trend:ÊÊDecreasing
Habitat and Ecology (see Appendix for additional information)
Bornean Orangutans are the largest arboreal mammals in the world, although they walk significant
distances on the ground (Ancrenaz et al. 2014). Historically, Bornean Orangutans were most abundant in
inundated and semi-inundated lowland Dipterocarp mosaic forests, where movement between different
habitat types could buffer them against shortages in food availability in a particular habitat type. Their
diet consists primarily of fruits, but also includes leaves, barks, flowers and insects (Russon et al. 2009).
Bornean Orangutans live a semi-solitary life and rarely aggregate in groups. Males are the dispersing sex:
upon reaching sexual maturity (at 10–12 years old), they leave the area where they were born to
establish large territories covering several hundred hectares. Females’ territories are smaller, with actual
size depending on forest type and availability of food resources. Bornean Orangutans are very slow
breeders and produce on average one offspring every 6–8 years, which explains their extreme sensitivity
to hunting pressure. Females reach maturity at 10–15 years old; they generally give birth to a single
infant after a gestation period of approximately 254 days (Kingsley 1981).
Systems:ÊÊTerrestrial
Use and Trade
For information on use and trade, see under Threats.
Threats (see Appendix for additional information)
Major threats include:
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
6

• Habitat loss. Between 2000 and 2010, the mean annual rate of deforestation for Borneo was 3,234
km² per year (Gaveau et al. 2014). Assuming a similar deforestation rate in the future, 32,000
km² of forest could be lost by 2020; 129,000 km² by 2050 and 226,000 km² by 2080
(Wich et al. 2015). In the early 2010s, only 22% of the current Bornean Orangutan distribution was
located in protected areas (Wich et al. 2012). Approximately a third of the entire Bornean Orangutan
range was in commercial forest reserves exploited for timber, and about 45% was in forest areas
earmarked for conversion to agriculture or other land uses. A business-as-usual scenario, whereby non-
protected forests would be converted along the lines of current development plans, will result in the
loss of more than half of the current orangutan range on the island of Borneo in the next 50 years or so.
• Illegal hunting. Illegal killing of Bornean Orangutans is a major cause of their decline. Recent interview
surveys conducted in Kalimantan revealed that several thousand individuals are killed every year for
meat consumption, as a way to mitigate conflict, or for other reasons (Davis et al. 2013). Overall
Bornean Orangutan mortality rates in Kalimantan seem to significantly exceed the maximum rates that
populations of this slow-breeding species can sustain (Marshall et al. 2009, Meijaard et al. 2011). If
hunting does not stop, all populations that are hunted will decline, irrespective of what happens to their
habitat. These findings confirm that habitat protection alone will not ensure the survival of orangutans
in Indonesian Borneo, and that effective reduction of orangutan killings is urgently needed.
• Fires. Fires occur in Borneo on a yearly basis and are responsible for significant forest loss with
dramatic results for certain orangutan populations. For example, 90% of Kutai National Park was lost to
massive fires in 1983 and 1998 and its Bornean Orangutan population was reduced from an estimated
4,000 individuals in the 1970s to a mere 600 (Rijksen and Meijaard 1999); over 4,000 km² of
peatland forest in southern Kalimantan was burnt to ashes in six months of 1997–1998, resulting in an
estimated loss of 8,000 orangutans. In 2015, more than 20,000 km² of forest were lost to fires,
which resulted in hundreds (or more) of additional orangutan deaths.
• Habitat fragmentation. With the current scale of habitat exploitation and forest conversion to other
types of land uses in Borneo, only a small percentage of current orangutan habitat will remain
undisturbed by infrastructure development by 2030 (Gaveau et al. 2013). Several orangutan PHVAs have
shown that Bornean Orangutan populations of fewer than 50 individuals are not viable in the long term
(Marshall et al. 2009), and that many small populations will go extinct unless they are actively managed
(Bruford et al. 2010).
• Lack of awareness. A recent study suggested that 27% of the people in Kalimantan did not know that
orangutans are protected by law (Meijaard et al. 2011). Campaigns to effectively inform the public and
encourage rural people to support the principles of environmental conservation and be actively
responsible for the management of their resources are therefore a crucial requirement for successful
orangutan conservation.
• Climate change. Spatial models point to the possibility that a large amount of current orangutan
habitat will become unsuitable because of changes in climate (Struebig et al. 2015). Across all climate
and land-cover change projections assessed in a recent analysis, models predicted that 49,000–83,000
km² of orangutan habitat will remain by 2080, reflecting a loss of 69–81% since 2010. This projection
represents a three to five-fold greater decline in habitat than that predicted by deforestation projections
alone. A major reduction in the extent of suitable orangutan habitat can be expected. However, core
strongholds of suitable orangutan habitat are predicted to remain to the west, east and northeast of the
island where populations of P. p. wurmbii and P. p. morio are found.
Conservation Actions (see Appendix for additional information)
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
7

The Bornean Orangutan is fully protected in Malaysia and Indonesia, and is listed on Appendix I of CITES.
However, its forest habitat is not necessarily protected: about 20% of the current orangutan range in
Sabah, and 80% in Kalimantan is not protected (Wich et al. 2012). Innovative mechanisms to ensure the
long-term survival of Bornean Orangutans outside protected forests are urgently needed.
The future of Bornean Orangutans will very much depend on the long-term security of large, strictly-
protected forests where illegal logging and hunting will be efficiently controlled and the orangutan
populations large enough to cope with catastrophic events such as fires and disease outbreaks
(Meijaard et al. 2011). These forests need to contain the ecological gradients that will provide the key
resources to sustain orangutans through climate and other gradual environmental changes (Gregory et
al. 2012). In the larger landscape, scientifically-based, regional land-use planning is needed to delineate
zones of interaction around protected forests and their surroundings, encompassing hydrological,
ecological and socio-economic interactions. Ideally, the core protected areas will remain connected to
other areas of forest that could be used sustainably for (commercial) timber extraction. The design of
such living landscapes must be approached across the whole landscape rather than at the site level.
Credits
Assessor(s): Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A.J., Meijaard, E., Wich , S.A. & Husson, S.
Reviewer(s): Williamson, L. & Mittermeier, R.A.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
8

Bibliography
Abram, N.K., Meijaard, E., Wells, J.A., Ancrenaz, M., Pellier, A.S., Runting, R.K., Gaveau, D.L.A., Wich, S.,
Nardiyono, Tiju, A., Nurcahyo, A. and Menkersen, K. 2015. Mapping perception of species’ threats and
population trends to inform conservation efforts: the Bornean orangutan case study. Diversity and
Distributions 21: 487–499.
Ancrenaz, M., Ambu, L., Sunjoto, I., Ahmad, E., Manokaran, K., Meijaard, E. and Lackman, I. 2010. Recent
surveys in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua, Sabah, Malaysia, show that orang-utans (P. p. morio) can be
maintained in slightly logged forests. PLoS One 5: e11510.
Ancrenaz, M., Gimenez, O., Ambu, L., Ancrenaz, K., Andau, P., Goossens, B., Payne, J., Tuuga, A. and
Lackman-Ancrenaz, I. 2005. Aerial surveys give new estimates for orang-utans in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS
Biology 3(1): 30–37.
Ancrenaz, M., Sollmann, R., Meijaard, E., Hearn, A.J., Ross, J., Samejima, H., Loken, B., Cheyne, S.M.,
Stark, D.J., Gardner, P.C., Goossens, B., Mohamed, A., Bohm, T., Matsuda, I., Nakabayasi, M., Lee, S.K.,
Bernard, H., Brodie, J., Wich, S., Fredriksson, G., Hanya, G., Harrison, M.E., Kanamori, T., Kretzschmar, P.,
Macdonald, D.W., Riger, P., Spehar, S., Ambu, L.N. and Wilting, A. 2014. Coming down the trees: is
terrestrial activity in orangutans natural or disturbance-driven? Nature Scientific Reports 4(4024): 1–4.
Bruford, M.W., Ancrenaz, M., Chikhi, L., Lackman-Ancrenaz, I., Andau, M., Ambu, L. and Goossens, B.
2010. Projecting genetic diversity and population viability for the fragmented orangutan population in
the Kinabatangan floodplain, Sabah, Malaysia. Endangered Species Research 12: 249–261.
Davis, J.T., Mengersen, K., Abram, N., Ancrenaz, M., Wells, J. and Meijaard, E. 2013. It’s not just conflict
that motivates killing of orangutans. PLoS One 8: e75373.
Gaveau, D.L.A., Kshatriya, M., Sheil, D., Sloan, S., Molidena, E., Wijaya, A., Wich, S., Ancrenaz, M.,
Hansen, M., Broich, M., Guariguata, M.R., Pacheco, P., Potapov, P., Turubanova, S. and Meijaard, E. 2013.
Reconciling forest conservation and logging in Indonesian Borneo. PLoS One 8: e69887.
Gaveau, D.L.A., Sloan, S., Molidena, E., Yaen, H., Sheil, D., Abram, N.K., Ancrenaz, M., Nasi, R., Quinones,
M., Wielaard. N. and Meijaard, E. 2014. Four decades of forest persistence, clearance and logging on
Borneo. PLoS One 9(7): e101654.
Goossens, B., Chikhi, L., Ancrenaz, M., Lackman-Ancrenaz, I., Andau, P. and Bruford, M.W. 2006. Genetic
signature of anthropogenic population collapse in orang-utans. PLoS Biology 4: 285–291.
Goossens, B., Chikhi, L., Jalil, F., Ancrenaz, M., Lackman-Ancrenaz, I., Mohammed, M., Andau, P. and
Bruford, M.W. 2005. Patterns of genetic diversity and migration in increasingly fragmented and declining
orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) populations from Sabah, Malaysia. Molecular Ecology 14: 441–456.
Goossens, B., Chikki, L., Jalil, F., James, S., Ancrenaz, M., Lackman-Ancrenaz, I. and Bruford, M.W. 2009.
Taxonomy, geographic variation and population genetics of Bornean and Sumatran orangutans. In: S.A.
Wich, S.S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia and C.P. van Schaik (eds), Orangutans: Geographic Variation in
Behavioral Ecology and Conservation, pp. 1–13. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Gregory, S.D., Brook, B.W., Goossens, B., Ancrenaz, M., Alfred, R., Ambu, L.N. and Fordham, D.A. 2012.
Long-term field data and climate-habitat models show that orangutan persistence depends on effective
forest management and greenhouse gas mitigation. PLoS One 7(9): e43846.
Husson, S.J., Morrogh-Bernard, H., Santiano, Purwanto, A., Harsanto, F., McLardy, C. and D’Arcy, L. 2015.
Long-term temporal trends in ape populations in four case studies: Bornean orangutans in the Sabangau
peat-swamp forest. In: Arcus Foundation (ed.), State of the Apes 2015: Industrial Agriculture and Ape
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
9

Conservation, pp. 200–207. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Husson, S.J., Wich, S.A., Marshall, A.J., Dennis, R.D., Ancrenaz, M., Brassey, R., Gumal, M., Hearn, A.J.,
Meijaard, E., Simorangkir, T. and Singleton, I. 2009. Orangutan distribution, density, abundance and
impacts of disturbance. In: S.A. Wich, S.S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia and C.P. van Schaik (eds),
Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation, pp. 77–96. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, UK.
IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-1. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org.
(Accessed: 30 June 2016).
Kingsley, S. 1981. The reproductive physiology and behaviour of captive orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).
University of London.
Marshall, A.J., Lacy, R., Ancrenaz, M., Byers, O., Husson S.J., Leighton, M., Meijaard, E., Rosen, N.,
Singleton, I., Stephens, S., Traylor-Holzer, K., Utami Atmoko, S.S., van Schaik, C.P. and Wich, S.A. 2009.
Orangutan population biology, life history, and conservation. Perspectives from population viability
analysis models. In: S.A. Wich, S.S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia and C.P. van Schaik (eds), Orangutans:
Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation, pp. 311–326. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, UK.
Meijaard, E., Buchori, D., Hadiprakarsa, Y., Ancrenaz, M. et al. 2011. Quantifying killing of orangutans
and human-orangutan conflict in Kalimantan, Indonesia. PLoS One 6(11): e27491.
Meijaard, E., Welsh, A., Ancrenaz, M., Wich, S., Nijman, V. and Marshall, A.J. 2010. Declining orangutan
encounter rates from Wallace to the present suggest the species was once more abundant. PLoS One
5(8): e12042.
Meijaard, E., Wich, S., Ancrenaz, M. and Marshall, A.J. 2012. Not by science alone: why orangutan
conservationists must think outside the box. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1249: 29–44.
Rijksen, H.D. and Meijaard, E. 1999. Our Vanishing Relative: The Status of Wild Orangutans at the Close
of the Twentieth Century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Russon, A.E., Wich, S.A., Ancrenaz, M., Kanamori, T., Knott, C.D., Kuze N., Morrogh-Bernard, H.C., Pratje,
P., Ramlee, H., Rodman, P., Sawang, A., Sidiyasa, K., Singleton, I. and van Schaik, C.P. 2009. Geographic
variation in orangutan diets. In: S.A. Wich, S.S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia and C.P. van Schaik (eds),
Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation, pp. 135–156. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, UK.
Santika, T., Meijaard, E. and Wilson, K.A. 2015. Designing multifunctional landscapes for forest
conservation. Environmental Research Letters 10: 114012–114020.
Struebig, M.J., Fischer, M., Gaveau, D.L.A., Meijaard, E., Wich, S.A., Gonner, C., Sykes, R., Wilting, A. and
Kramer-Schadt, S. 2015. Anticipated climate and land-cover changes reveal refuge areas for Borneo's
orang‐utans. Global Change Biology 21: 2891–2904.
Wich, S.A., de Vries, H., Ancrenaz, M., Perkins, L., Shumaker, R.W., Suzuki A. and van Schaik, C.P. 2009.
Orangutan life history variation. In: S.A. Wich, S.S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia and C.P. van Schaik (eds),
Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation, pp. 65–75. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, UK.
Wich, S.A., Gaveau, D., Abram, N., Ancrenaz, M., Baccini, A. et al.. 2012. Understanding the impacts of
land-use policies on a threatened species: is there a future for the Bornean orangutan? PLoS One 7(11):
e49142.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
10

Wich, S.A., Meijaard, E., Marshall, A., Husson, S., Ancrenaz, M., Lacy, R., van Schaik, C., Sugardjito, J.,
Simorangkir, T., Traylor-Holzer, K., Doughty, M., Supriatna, J., Dennis, R., Gumal, M., Knott, C. and
Singleton, I. 2008. Distribution and conservation status of the orangutan (Pongo spp.) on Borneo and
Sumatra: how many remain? Oryx 42: 1–11.
Wich, S.A., Singleton, I., Nowak, M.G., Utami Atmoko, S.S., Nisam, G., Arif, S.M., Putra, R.H., Ardi, R.,
Fredriksson, G., Usher, G., Gaveau, D.L.A and Kühl, H.S. 2016. Land-cover changes predict steep declines
for the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). Science Advances 2(3): e1500789.
Wich, S.A., Struebig, M., Refisch, J. Wilting, A., Kramer-Schadt, S. and Meijaard, E. 2015. The Future of
the Bornean Orangutan: Impacts of Change in Land Cover and Climate. UNEP/GRASP, Nairobi.
Citation
Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A.J., Meijaard, E., Wich , S.A. & Husson, S. 2016. Pongo pygmaeus.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T17975A17966347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
Disclaimer
To make use of this information, please check the Terms of Use.
External Resources
For Supplementary Material, and for Images and External Links to Additional Information, please see the
Red List website.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
11

Appendix
Habitats
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Habitat Season Suitability Major
Importance?
1. Forest -> 1.6. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Resident Suitable Yes
Threats
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Impact Score
1. Residential & commercial development -> 1.1.
Housing & urban areas
Ongoing Minority (50%) Slow, significant
declines
Low impact: 5
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.1. Habitat
shifting & alteration
Ongoing Whole (>90%) Slow, significant
declines
Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.1. Annual &
perennial non-timber crops -> 2.1.2. Small-holder
farming
Ongoing Minority (50%) Rapid declines Medium
impact: 6
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.1. Annual &
perennial non-timber crops -> 2.1.3. Agro-industry
farming
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
Very rapid
declines
High impact: 8
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.2. Wood & pulp
plantations -> 2.2.2. Agro-industry plantations
Ongoing Minority (50%) Very rapid
declines
Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
3. Energy production & mining -> 3.2. Mining &
quarrying
Ongoing Minority (50%) Slow, significant
declines
Low impact: 5
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance
5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping
terrestrial animals -> 5.1.1. Intentional use (species is
the target)
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
Very rapid
declines
High impact: 8
Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
5. Biological resource use -> 5.1. Hunting & trapping
terrestrial animals -> 5.1.3. Persecution/control
Ongoing Minority (50%) Very rapid
declines
Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
12

5. Biological resource use -> 5.3. Logging & wood
harvesting -> 5.3.5. Motivation
Unknown/Unrecorded
Ongoing Minority (50%) Slow, significant
declines
Low impact: 5
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
7. Natural system modifications -> 7.1. Fire & fire
suppression -> 7.1.1. Increase in fire
frequency/intensity
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
Rapid declines Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
Conservation Actions in Place
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Conservation Actions in Place
In-Place Research, Monitoring and Planning
Action Recovery plan: No
Systematic monitoring scheme: No
In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management
Conservation sites identified: Yes, over part of range
Occur in at least one PA: Yes
Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100): 31-40
Area based regional management plan: Yes
In-Place Species Management
Harvest management plan: No
In-Place Education
Included in international legislation: Yes
Subject to any international management/trade controls: Yes
Conservation Actions Needed
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Conservation Actions Needed
1. Land/water protection -> 1.1. Site/area protection
2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management
5. Law & policy -> 5.1. Legislation -> 5.1.1. International level
5. Law & policy -> 5.1. Legislation -> 5.1.2. National level
5. Law & policy -> 5.4. Compliance and enforcement -> 5.4.1. International level
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
13

Research Needed
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Research Needed
1. Research -> 1.2. Population size, distribution & trends
2. Conservation Planning -> 2.2. Area-based Management Plan
3. Monitoring -> 3.1. Population trends
3. Monitoring -> 3.4. Habitat trends
Additional Data Fields
Distribution
Lower elevation limit (m): 0
Upper elevation limit (m): 500
Population
Continuing decline of mature individuals: Yes
Extreme fluctuations: No
Population severely fragmented: Yes
Continuing decline in subpopulations: Unknown
Extreme fluctuations in subpopulations: Unknown
All individuals in one subpopulation: No
Habitats and Ecology
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat: Yes
Generation Length (years): 25
Movement patterns: Not a Migrant
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
14

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
ISSN 2307-8235 (online)
IUCN 2008: T17975A17966347
The IUCN Red List Partnership
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species
Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership.
The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International;
Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of
Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London.
THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Pongo pygmaeus – published in 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en
15