The threat of increasing diversity: Why many White Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election

ArticleinGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations · October 2016with283 Reads
DOI: 10.1177/1368430216677304
Abstract
What accounts for the widespread support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential race? This experiment demonstrates that the changing racial demographics of America contribute to Trump’s success as a presidential candidate among White Americans whose race/ethnicity is central to their identity. Reminding White Americans high in ethnic identification that non-White racial groups will outnumber Whites in the United States by 2042 caused them to become more concerned about the declining status and influence of White Americans as a group (i.e., experience group status threat), and caused them to report increased support for Trump and anti-immigrant policies, as well as greater opposition to political correctness. Increased group status threat mediated the effects of the racial shift condition on candidate support, anti-immigrant policy support, and opposition to political correctness. Among Whites low in ethnic identification, in contrast, the racial shift condition had no effect on group status threat or support for anti-immigrant policies, but did cause decreased positivity toward Trump and decreased opposition to political correctness. Group status threat did not mediate these effects. Reminders of the changing racial demographics had comparable effects for Democrats and Republicans. Results illustrate the importance of changing racial demographics and White ethnic identification in voter preferences and how social psychological theory can illuminate voter preferences.

Do you want to read the rest of this article?

Article
    Members of high-status groups may perceive pro-diversity messages from organizations as threatening to their group's status. Two initial studies (. N=. 322) demonstrate that when imagining applying for a job, whites-and not ethnic/racial minorities-expressed more concerns about being treated unfairly and about anti-white discrimination when the company mentioned (vs. did not mention) its... [Show full abstract]
    Article
    September 2017 · PLoS ONE
      The United States is undergoing a demographic shift in which White Americans are predicted to comprise less than 50% of the US population by mid-century. The present research examines how exposure to information about this racial shift affects perceptions of the extent to which different racial groups face discrimination. In four experiments, making the growing national racial diversity... [Show full abstract]
      Article
      December 2014 · American Quarterly
        This introduction observes that claims that the 2008 election of President Barack Obama heralded the dawn of a “postracial” moment in US history have proved false in the intervening years. In addition to the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, greater awareness of widening wealth and income inequality, and environmental crises, a number of incidents call attention to the continued... [Show full abstract]
        Article
          Although White Americans experience less frequent and less severe forms of discrimination than ethnic minorities (Schmitt & Branscombe, 2002), White Americans may actually be more likely to claim discrimination compared to ethnic minorities (Goldman, 2001). The present research investigated evaluations of White and Black American discrimination claimants' political views and prejudicial... [Show full abstract]
          Discover more