Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
T
HE OSTRACO
N
THE JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN STUDY SOCIETY
VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2; SUMMER 2002
PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE
ESS STAFF LIAISON
Carol Cochran
The Ostracon is published two or three
times a year by members of the
Egyptian Study Society. The ESS, a
cooperating organization with the
Denver Museum of Nature and
Science, is a non-profit organization
whose purpose is to study ancient
Egypt. Articles are contributed by
members and scholars on a voluntary
basis. Member participation is
encouraged. Nothing may be reprinted
in whole or part without written
permission of the author.
For submission guidelines, see the ESS Web
site at www.EgyptStudy.org or e-mail the
Editor at Ostracon@EgyptStudy.org.
The opinions expressed in The Ostracon do
not necessarily represent the views of the
Publications Committee, the Egyptian Study
Society, or the Denver Museum of Nature and
Science.
©2002 Egyptian Study Society
Publication of The Ostracon is
supported by a grant from
THE PETTY FOUNDATION
Egyptian Study Society, Inc.
P.O. Box 40754
Denver, Colorado 80204-0754
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Bigelow
Susan Cottman
Judy Greenfield
Richard Harwood
Anita McHugh
Dena Newkirk
Maryanne Patterson
Frank Pettee
Mary Pratchett
IN THIS ISSUE ...
ANCIENT EGYPTIAN HAIR AND WIGS
Joann Fletcher
THE MUSICIAN-PRIESTESSES OF ANCIENT EGYPT
Suzanne Onstine
INTERSECTION OF TEXT AND OBJECT: OFFERING TABLES AND CULTIC
PERFORMANCE
Harold M. Hays
THE PREHISTORY OF EGYPT, OR HOW IT ALL BEGAN
Lecture hy Ellen LeBlanc. Summary by Anita McHugh
HOUSE OF SCROLLS
Book Review
2
9
14
17
20
2
Ancient Egyptian Hair and Wigs
Joann Fletcher
he hair of the ancient Egyptians has only rela-
tively recently become the subject of long-term,
serious study after long being regarded as a rather
“frivolous” subject when compared to the texts
and chronologies pored over by generations of
learned men. Unfortunately such an attitude created some-
thing of an imbalance in Egyptology, and although of im-
mense importance, literary evidence is by no means the only
way to understand a culture. And given literacy rates of less
than 1%, it can hardly be the best way to study the lives of
the ancient Egyptians themselves.
Yet this of course depends on whom one imagines the
Egyptians to be. Certainly for many scholars, ancient Egypt
seems to have been populated by a literate male elite of
kings, priests and scribes while the silent majority have sim-
ply been dismissed as little more than illiterate “peasants”.
But these same “peasants” who built the monuments and
produced the wealth on which the culture was based deserve
to be the subject of serious study too, regardless of their
ability to produce convenient written evidence.
As an alternative source of information the remains of the
people themselves provide a wealth of evidence, with Egypt’s
democratic climate preserving both the artificially mummi-
fied bodies of the elite and the remains of the poorest indi-
viduals. Simply buried in the sand, the hot dry
conditions promoted natural mummification by allowing
the f luids responsible for decomposition to drain away while
at the same time desiccating and preserving the soft tissue of
skin, hair and nails. Not only were these features subject to
various forms of adornment, they also contain a great deal
of information which can be extracted using virtually non-
destructive techniques of analysis.
With scientif ic research becoming increasingly detailed,
each part of the body is beginning to tell its own fascinating
story. This is particularly the case with hair, which Egyptians
of all social groups treated in a wide variety of ways for a
wide variety of reasons. The way they chose to portray it and
the resulting development of hair styles can also be used to
establish a useful chronology for the whole dynastic period,
which can then be compared to the various types of hair
remains that have survived.1
Yet it is clear from both the archaeological remains and
the artistic and literar y record that the Egyptians’ hair was
not always their own, a choice dependent on personal pref-
erence, wealth and social status and influenced by the fash-
ions which inevitably changed over several millennia. The
wigs and hair extensions worn as items of both daily and
funerary attire combined the desire for ornate and impres-
sive styles with the practicalities of cleanliness. In Egypt’s
extreme climate, the coolest option of a shaven or cropped
head could be shielded from the harmful effects of the sun
with a wig, a choice preferable to a simple linen head cloth
as it would allow body heat to escape through its net-like
foundation base while keeping the head protected. The re-
moval of the natural hair and subsequent adoption of wigs
was also a hygienic measure and greatly reduced the health
risks associated with parasitic infestation, particularly head
lice (Pediculus humanus capitis). Indeed, the Greek historian
Herodotus stated that “Egyptian priests shave their bodies
all over every other day to guard against the presence of lice,
or anything else equally unpleasant, while they are about
their religious duties.”2
The hair used in the construction of wigs and hair exten-
sions was human, and was either an individual’s own hair or
had been traded for, hair itself being a valuable commodity
ranked alongside gold and incense in account lists from the
town of Kahun.3 Once the required amounts of hair had
been collected, it would be sorted into lengths and any tangles
removed with fine-toothed combs which also removed any
Hairdressing scene of Queen Nefru, 11th Dynasty,
Deir el-Bahari, Brooklyn Museum.
Photo copyright Dr. Joann Fletcher.
3
lice eggs, traces of which can still sometimes be found be-
tween their teeth. Using an impressive array of hairdressing
tools, the wigmakers would then work the prepared lengths
of hair into an assortment of braids, plaits or curls depend-
ing upon the style required, with each piece coated in a
warmed beeswax and resin f ixative mixture which would
harden when cooled. Since the melting point of beeswax is
140°–145°F, this method of securing the hair would have
been effective even in Egypt’s extreme climate.
The individual locks or braids could then be attached
directly to the natural hair in the form of extensions, or
alternatively they could be used to create a whole wig by
fastening the individual sections of hair onto a mesh-type
foundation base manufactured on a head-shaped wooden
mount. Although linen strings or leather strips were occa-
sionally employed in its construction, the base was most
often made from fine lengths of plaited or woven hair. The
separate locks could then be attached by weaving them
directly into wefts of hair which in turn formed part of the
net base, or alternatively knotting them into position.
A further method was to attach each lock by looping its
root end around a part of the net and pressing it back on
itself, securing it by winding a smaller substrand of hair around
it and applying a further coating of the beeswax and resin
mixture. Such construction techniques and the obvious skill
of the wigmakers themselves produced wigs of a standard
often equivalent to modern examples, and despite contin-
ued speculation that their weight might be sufficient to cause
parietal thinning of the skull(!), their lightweight construc-
tion would have made them as equally easy to wear.4
Our recent discoveries at the manual workers’ cemetery at
Hierakonpolis reveal the use of hair extensions as early as
3400 BCE5, with the earliest fragments of actual wigs dated
to the very beginning of the dynastic period. These have
been found in relatively large numbers at the Umm el-Qa’ab
necropolis at Abydos and, despite their fragmentary nature,
nevertheless reveal highly complex construction techniques
that involved lengths of hair weft to which a wide variety of
curls, ringlets and plaits were attached.
Although there are relatively few “hair finds” from the
Old Kingdom, the 11th Dynasty necropolis at Deir el-Bahari
has produced a wealth of fascinating examples relating to
the court of Mentuhotep II (c. 2061-2010 BCE).
Several of the king’s wives were discovered in a wonderful
state of preservation, including his 20-year-old “Great Royal
Wife”, Ashayet, whose own short, bobbed hair had been set
in numerous fine plaits. The ends of each had been secured
with a drop of resin fixative and her natural dark brown
colour had been enhanced with an application of dark brown
vegetable colorant. Yet perhaps the most interesting example
was found in the mass grave of the king’s soldiers, one of
whom was found to have supplemented his own hair with
short curled extensions of false hair. Since his burial seems
to have been hastily carried out following battle, this cannot
be explained as a post-mortem feature and must have been
worn in life, supporting the theory that hair was the soldier’s
only protection prior to the introduction of helmets.6
The oldest intact wigs also date from this period, the ear-
liest of which would appear to be that found in the tomb of
the priestess Amunet. Wigs were also discovered within their
wooden storage boxes in a number of 12th Dynasty tombs
around the cemetery site of el-Lisht, and despite their poor
state of preservation they all appear to have been made of
human hair coated in a resinous fixative substance.7
By the New Kingdom, the range of wigs and false braids
that have survived reflect the large number of styles fashion-
able at the time for both men and women. A particularly
fine example from Thebes and now in the British Museum
Man’s double-style wig, New Kingdom, Thebes, British Museum.
Photo copyright Dr. Joann Fletcher.
4
is composed entirely of human hair set in two distinct sec-
tions: an upper part of light brown curls set over an
undersection of several hundred dark brown plaits which
originally measured up to 38cm (14.96 inches) in length.
This is clearly an example of the “double” (or “duplex”)
style so favored by male officials and noblemen of the pe-
riod, but repeated references to “a noblewoman’s wig” re-
flect a tendency to assign anything vaguely decorative as
having belonged to a woman.8
A similar unprovenanced example of slightly later New
Kingdom date, now in Berlin, again features this arrange-
ment of curls and plaits set on a net base, with a further
fragmentary example of the same double style formed by
the portions of Yuya’s wig found in his tomb (KV 46) in the
Valley of the Kings. An intriguing sample of “artificially curled
ringlets”, suggestive of a shorter wig, was discovered in a
small calcite chest among the funerary equipment of Yuya’s
probable great-grandson, Tutankhamun.
The Nubian fan bearer, Maherpra, was also buried in the
Royal Valley, but in contrast to the previous highly artif icial
styles he wore a unique coiffure of short tight spirals of his
own heliotrichous (Negroid) hair set over his shaven head,
creating the impression of a totally natural style.9
It is also quite apparent that women’s wigs were consider-
ably less elaborate than those worn by men and consequently
appear more natural. The best preserved example of the long
full style so favored by New Kingdom women was found
inside the tall wooden wig box of Meryt in the Deir el-
Medina tomb she shared with her husband Kha. It is made
of numerous wavy braids of dark brown hair a little over
50cm (19.68 inches) long, set by means of complex knot
work around the narrow plait which forms a central parting.
A similar wig of long plaits was found on the head of the
mummy of the princess Hontempet who had also been pro-
vided with a second wig, made up of artificially curled locks
complete with a fringe of small ringlets.10
In addition to complete wigs, individual braids were em-
ployed to create wider and longer dimensions. The hair of a
man buried at el-Mustagidda had been artificially length-
ened with human hair attached to his own hair with thread,
while the wavy brown hair of Queen Meryet-Amun had been
filled out around the crown and temples with numerous
tapered braids to produce the “top-heavy” effect fashionable
at the time. She had also been buried with a duplicate set of
braids as part of her funerary equipment, and similar sets of
false braids were found in the burials of the female relatives
of Hatshepsut’s great official Senenmut. A large number of
tapered plaits of dark brown human hair had been attached
to the short grey curls of his mother, Hatnefer and, arranged
in two thick masses at each side of her head, the ends had
been set in two rounded sections to create the so-called
“Hathor” curled, bouffant style featured in artistic represen-
tation.11
False braids could also be worn to denote religious affili-
ation, with devotees of the goddess Hathor sometimes at-
taching a triple strand of braids at the back of the head. And
on a more practical level, such braids could also be used to
disguise areas of baldness most often caused by old age. The
mummy identified as Queen Tetisheri was found to have
substantial plaits of brown hair woven into her own sparse
white locks, and a similar technique had been employed
by the hairdressers of Queen Ahmose-Nofretari and
Hontimihou.12
Wigs clearly remained high status items during the Third
Intermediate Period, with the double style well represented
by the enormous wigs on display in the Cairo Museum that
were discovered in the Deir el-Bahri cache of priests’ mum-
mies discovered in 1881. One such wig was found inside a
box bearing the seals of High Priest Menkheperre, and de-
spite its huge double-part structure of curls and plaits, it was
assumed to have belonged to his wife, Istemkheb. Yet the
wig that was recently identified as hers is much smaller, a
simply creation of curls and typical of the short, feminine
styles of the time. A further seven huge examples of the
male double style from the same cache again exhibit the
two-part construction of curls and plaits of human hair, al-
Short curled wig of Istemkheb, 21st Dynasty,
Deir el-Bahari cache (DB 320), Cairo Museum.
Photo copyright Dr. Joann Fletcher.
5
though small bundles of date palm fiber were used as an
internal padding in order to create impressive dimensions
while economizing on hair.13
The same trend can be found in the construction of many
of the women’s wigs of the period, the dark brown plaits of
Queen Nodjmet’s wig being described as being “tied to
strings” to form the foundation base. Linen was also em-
ployed as the base for the plaited hair which made up the
wig of Nany, Chantress of Amun-Ra, while a wig composed
entirely of “black string” set in narrow spirals was found at
the head of Queen Hentawy.14
Despite losing popularity during the Late Period, the fash-
ion for wigs was revived during Roman times. Although the
most elaborate examples were again made entirely of date
palm fibre or grass, hair was still used in the production of
other wigs and smaller hairpieces. A section of plaited hair
set in a rigid crescent shape and supported by 62 bronze
pins was found at the settlement site of Gurob, and known
as an “orbis”, was described as “probably the only example
surviving of a well-known hairdressing of the period of
Trajan”.15
Despite such wonderful examples of the hairdresser’s art,
it seems surprising that hair had never received the detailed
treatment it so obviously deserved. When not ignored alto-
gether, it had tended to be misinterpreted, as exemplified by
the way in which many archaeologists and curators often
assume that all hair fragments are “wigs” when closer exami-
nation can reveal that this is simply not the case.
Rather more disturbing are the attempts to use hair to
prove assumptions of race and gender, one of the most
extreme examples involving the 1888 Gurob excavations of
Sir W.M. Flinders Petrie. Having discovered a body of
unspecified sex, he noted that the head was covered by
“a copious wig of black hair, reaching down to the waist, but
beneath this on the scalp was yellow or light brown hair”.
He goes on to conclude that “the person was light-haired
during life, and wore a wig of black, hiding the
foreign token” … an interesting comment given Petrie’s
attempts to find evidence to support his theories of Aegean
settlers. Yet our analysis of the “black wig” has shown that it
originally formed part of a dark blue woollen head cover,
and far from disguising his or her fair hair, the individual in
question had actually accentuated its lightness with a yellow
vegetable colorant.16
Unfortunately, such attitudes have by no means disap-
peared and there is still the tendency to assume that bodies
with short or shaven hair are male and those with long or
intricately styled hair are female, when again this is simply
not the case. Human hair was treated in a wide variety of
ways for an equally wide variety of reasons, and so all aspects
should be carefully considered.
First and foremost it is necessary to ascertain the precise
nature of the hair in question and decide if it is the natural
scalp hair, albeit desiccated and possibly separated from the
scalp itself. Alternatively, the hair could be described as “false”,
i.e. originally part of a wig or separate extensions. There is
also the possibility that the hair could be one of the many
votive or funerary deposits buried separately from the body,
a practice found from Predynastic to Roman times despite
its frequent omission from excavation reports.
Once the nature of the sample has been established, it is
then possible to undertake examination using a variety of
techniques, all of which can provide some incredible details
about the individual in question, from their general state of
health and quality of diet to their social status and even
profession.
A simple visual examination can establish basic facts such
as condition, color and length, evidence of styling techniques
and any parasitic infestation, particularly the presence of
head lice. Capable of transmitting diseases such as typhus
and relapsing fever and so useful in the study of disease
transmission, we have found evidence for lice in the hair of
kings and commoners alike, demonstrating that lice are no
respecters of social status. And contrary to popular belief,
they much prefer clean short hair which gives easy access to
the scalp’s blood supply on which they must feed f ive times
each day in order to survive. Their presence in hair samples
can also be used to confirm the identif ication of natural
hair rather than a wig, since lice can only thrive in the natu-
ral hair rather than in a wig which could be removed at any
time and thus proving a totally unsuitable habitat.17
Such parasitic infestations can be examined in greater de-
tail using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) which is also
used to look at the surface of the hair shaft to identify and
Line drawing of “orbis” hairpiece, Roman Period, Gurob, Petrie Museum.
Photo copyright Dr. Joann Fletcher.
6
distinguish between animal hair of different species and hu-
man hair of varying ethnic types and individuals. The hair of
the mummified “Elder Woman” found in the tomb of
Amenhotep II (KV 35) has been identified as Queen Tiy
after scanning electron microprobe analysis and ion etching
were used to compare a sample of the mummy’s hair with a
lock of the queen’s hair found in an inscribed coffinette in
the tomb of her probable grandson, Tutankhamun.18
Further examination of the hair’s surface structure can
also help to ascertain the original hair color which may have
faded over time, been changed by environmental conditions,
the process of mummification or by the use of dyes which
we have found in a number of samples and extracted and
identified by absorption spectrophotometry and thin-layer
chromatography. Microscopic examination of the hair ends
can also reveal details of specif ic styling techniques, with
recent analysis having revealed the use of very sharp blades
to cut the hair as early as c. 3000 BCE. SEM can also indi-
cate the individual’s health, with specific areas of interest
followed up using trace element analysis to provide informa-
tion regarding diet and nutritional def iciencies, diseases, lev-
els of environmental pollution and even the use of drugs
and poisons which remain in the hair shaft long after they
have left the rest of the body. And almost all of this is
possible using a single hair as a biopsy material or a sample
size of <0.1mg, literally the size of a pin head.19
Over the past few years, careful examination of various
hair samples has provided much fascinating information. In
1998 the plundered burial of a middle-aged woman from the
predynastic workers’ cemetery at Hierakonpolis proved par-
ticularly revealing after numerous scattered fragments of skull
and hair were reconstructed to allow us to recreate her origi-
nal hairstyle. This was clearly the result of many hours’ work
undertaken by someone other than the lady in question, her
natural hair of slightly more than shoulder-length having
been turned into an imposing crest-like coiffure using nu-
merous hair extensions, providing the earliest evidence of
false hair yet found in Egypt.
The find was even more significant when we discovered
that the woman’s graying brown hair had been dyed either
shortly before death or as a post-mortem treatment, the dye
turning the brown parts auburn while transforming the un-
pigmented white hairs bright orange. Those familiar with
the vegetable dye henna (Lawsonia inermis) will recognize its
characteristic effect, and indeed henna shrubs still grow at
the site and continue to be used for the same purpose by the
local population. They kindly showed us where the best leaves
were to be found and, allowing us to help ourselves, they
demonstrated the heavy stone they use to grind them to a
fine powder which is mixed with water to color the hair,
skin and nails. Inspired, we decided to undertake compara-
tive tests using modern hair samples kindly supplied by
members of our team, and our tests replicated exactly the
effects observed in these ancient samples.20
Our most recent field season, earlier this year at the site
of the mysterious royal tomb KV 39 in the Valley of the
Kings, revealed more wonderful hair f inds, with the remains
of at least four carefully plaited wigs of early 18th Dynasty
date demonstrating a range of shades from the darkest brown
to a mid-brown, almost blond color which may once again
be the result of vegetable dyes. Although we have only just
begun our work on these finds, the ongoing results are con-
tinuing to provide clues to previously unanswered questions,
not only regarding the hair but also the nails, soft tissue and
indeed the linen mummy wrappings and mummification
materials which are being studied in detail.
As the most modern analytical techniques are starting to
reveal the secrets of these ancient people, it is well worth
remembering that what at first may appear as nothing very
special can often have an interesting tale to tell, if only we
pay such material as much attention as the ancient Egyp-
tians themselves so obviously did.
Dr. Joann Fletcher has a B.A. in Egyptology and Ancient
History from University College London and a Ph.D. in
Egyptology from Manchester University. She specializes in
human remains which she has studied in museum collections
around the world and on site in Egypt, Yemen and South
America. She is Egyptologist at Harrogate Museum and field
director of York University’s Mummy Research Project. As well
as her own publications, Dr. Fletcher writes regular features for
the Guardian newspaper and the BBC’s History Online Web
site.
SEM photograph of ancient head louse, c. 3000 BCE, Abydos,
Manchester Museum. Photo copyright Dr. Joann Fletcher.
7
NOTES
1. As documented in the author’s 1995 doctoral thesis:
Ancient Egyptian Hair: A Study in Style, Form and Function.
2. For Herodotus (Histories II.36) see de Sélincourt 1954
p.143, with lice described in Fletcher, 1994.
3. Griff ith 1898, p. 39, 48-50, pl. XIX-XX.
4. For tools and construction methods see Cox 1977 and
Laskowska-Kusztal 1978, parietal thinning suggested by Smith
1912, p. 36 and the work of hairdressers and wigmakers de-
scribed and illustrated in Riefstahl 1952 and Fletcher 1995,
p. 431-463.
5. See Fletcher 1998, p. 4.
6. Ashayet discussed in Fletcher (forthcoming), with refer-
ence to soldier’s hair in Winlock 1945, p. 9, similar “protec-
tive” qualities of wigs mentioned in Kanawati & Abder-Raziq
2001, p. 69.
7. Amunet in Lucas 1930, p. 196 and one of the wigs from
Lisht described in Lansing 1933, p. 26, fig. 39.
8. Cox 1977, p. 67-70, fig. 1, pl. X.1, Fletcher 1994, 32-33 and
Fletcher 2000, fig. 20.1, p. 497.
9. Yuya’s wig in Lucas 1930, p.195, the hair remains from
Tutankhamen’s tomb in Fletcher & Montserrat 1997 and
Fletcher in Vogelsang-Eastwood 1999, and Maherpra’s wig in
Daressy 1903, p. 74-75.
10. Meryt’s wig in Chiotasso et al. 1992, Carpignano & Rabino
Massa 1981 and Fletcher 2000, f ig. 20.2, p. 497, and
Hontempet in Smith 1912, p. 20-21, pl. 16-17.
11. Mostagedda male burial in Brunton 1937, p. 123,
MeryetAmun in Winlock 1932, p. 9, 34, 47, 75-6, pl. 13,
32-3 and Riefstahl 1952, p. 15, fig. 4 and Hatnefer in Fletcher
2000, p. 498.
12. The triple braids portrayed in artistic representations have
also been found in the hair of mummified individuals, in
Fletcher 1995 and in Fletcher, forthcoming. For Tetisheri’s
false braids see Smith 1912, p. 14-5, fig. 2, pl. 9-10, Ahmose-
Nofretari in Smith 1912, p. 13-4, pl. 7 and Hontimihou in
Smith 1912, p. 19, pl. 14.
13. See Lucas 1930, p. 190-192 and Fletcher 2000, fig. 20.3, p.
498.
14. Nodjmet’s wig in Smith 1912, p. 96, pl. 69-71, Nany’s wig
in Winlock 1932, p. 55, 81-2 and Hentawy in Smith 1912, p.
103, pl. 75-6.
15. Vegetable fiber wigs in Lucas 1930, p. 194-195 and orbis
in Petrie 1927, p. 5, pl. 4 and Fletcher 2000, p. 499, fig.
20.4.b.
16. Petrie 1890, p. 39 and Fletcher & Montserrat 1997.
17. See Fletcher, 1994.
18. See Harris et al. 1978, although their identification is not
totally conclusive and their results criticized due to the lack
of comparitive data, in Germer 1984.
19. For hair analysis see Rabino Massa & Conti Fuhrman
1980, Carpignano & Rabino Massa 1981, Hrdy 1978, Paris
1985, p. 224-30, 240-1, Brothwell & Spearman 1963, p. 432-3,
Gössler et al. 1995, p. 269-273 and Fletcher 2000, p. 499-500;
analytical work by S. Buckley and J. Fletcher ongoing as part
of York University’s Mummy Research Project with initial
findings outlined in Buckley and Evershed 2001.
20. See Fletcher 1998, p. 4.
REFERENCES
Brothwell, D. and R. Spearman. 1963. “The Hair of Earlier
Peoples.” Science in Archaeology (ed. Brothwell, D. and E. Higgs,
E.), pp. 427-436. London: Thames and Hudson.
Brunton, G. 1937. Mostagedda and the Tasian Culture, London:
Quaritch.
Buckley, S. & R. Evershed. 2001. “The Organic Chemistry of
Embalming Agents in Pharaonic and Graeco-Roman Mum-
mies.” Nature (vol. 413, issue 6858), pp. 837-841.
Carpignano, G. & E. Rabino Massa. 1981. “Analisi di un campione
di capelli della parrucca appartenente alla moglie dell’architetto
Kha.” Oriens Antiquus: 20, pp. 229-230, pl. 25.
Chiotasso, L., P. Chiotasso, L. Pedrini, G. Rigoni & C. Sarnelli.
1992. “La parrucca di Merit.”, Sesto Congresso Internazionale di
Egitto, Atti I, Turin, pp. 99-105.
Cox, J.S. 1977. “The Construction of an Ancient Egyptian Wig (c.
1400 BC) in the British Museum.” Journal of Egyptian
Archaeology 63, pp. 67-70.
Daressy, G. 1903. “Observations prises sur la momie de Maherpra.”
Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Egypte 4, pp. 74-75.
Fletcher, A. J. 1994. “A Tale of Hair, Wigs and Lice.” Egyptian
Archaeology: the Bulletin of the Egypt Exploration Society: 5,
pp. 31-33.
Fletcher, A.J. 1995. Ancient Egyptian Hair: A Study in Style, Form
and Function. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Manchester Uni-
versity.
Fletcher, J. 1998. “The Secrets of the Locks Unravelled.” Nekhen
News: Newsletter of the Friends of Nekhen, Vol. 10 (Fall), p. 4.
Fletcher, J. 2000. “Hair.” Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technol-
ogy, eds. P. Nicholson & I. Shaw, Cambridge University Press,
pp. 495-501.
Fletcher, A. J. (forthcoming). Ancient Egyptian Hairstyles and Wigs.
Austin: University of Texas Press.
8
Fletcher, J. & D. Montserrat. 1997. “The Human Hair from the
Tomb of Tutankhamun: a Re-evaluation.” Proceedings of the
Seventh International Congress of Egyptologists. Peeters, Leuven,
pp. 403-407.
Germer, R. 1984. “Die angebliche mumie der Teje, probleme
interdisziplinärer arbeiten.” Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur
11, pp. 85-90.
Gössler, W. et al. 1995. “Priest, Hunter, Alpine Shepherd, or Smelter
Worker?” Mann im Eis: Neue Funde und Ergebnisse (ed. K.
Spindler et al.), Vienna, pp. 269-273.
Griffith, F.Ll. 1898. Hieratic Papyri from Kahun and Gurob. Lon-
don: Egypt Exploration Fund.
Harris, J.E., E. Wente, C. Cox, I. Nawaway, C. Kowalski, A. Storey,
W. Russell, P. Ponitz & G. Walker. 1978. “Mummy of the ‘El-
der Lady’ in the Tomb of Amenhotep II: Egyptian Museum
Catalog Number 61070.” Science 200, pp. 1149-1151.
Herodotus (translated by de Sélincourt, A.). 1954. The Histories,
Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hrdy, D.B. 1978. “Analysis of Hair Samples of Mummies from
Semna South (Sudanese Nubia).” American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 49, pp. 277-282.
Kanawati, N. & M. Abder-Raziq. 2001. The Teti Cemetery at Saqqara
VII: the Tombs of Shepsipuptah, Mereri (Merinebti, Hefi and Oth-
ers). Warminster: Aris and Phillips.
Lansing, A 1933. “The Egyptian Expedition 1932-3: The Excava-
tions at Lisht.” Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art –
Egyptian Supplements (November 1933), pp. 4-38.
Laskowska-Kusztal, E. 1978. “Un Atelier de Perruquier à Deir el-
Bahari.” Études et Travaux 10, pp. 84-120.
Lucas, A. 1930. “Ancient Egyptian Wigs.” Annales du Service des
Antiquités de l’Egypte 30, pp. 190-196.
Paris: Musée de l’Homme. 1985. La Momie de Ramsès II. Paris.
Petrie, W.M.F. 1890. Kahun, Gurob and Hawara. London: Egypt
Exploration Society.
Petrie, W.M.F. 1927. Objects of Daily Use. London: British School
of Archaeology in Egypt.
Rabino Massa, E. & A.M. Conti Fuhrman. 1980. “Early Egyptian
Mummy Hairs: Tensile Strength Tests, Optical and Scanning
Electron Microscope Observation: A Paleobiological Research.”
Journal of Human Evolution, 9, pp. 133-137.
Riefstahl, E. 1952. “An Ancient Egyptian Hairdresser.” Bulletin of
the Brooklyn Museum, 13 (4), pp. 7-16.
Smith, G.E. 1912. The Royal Mummies, Cairo: Service des Antiq-
uities de l’Egypte.
Vogelsang-Eastwood, G. 1999. Tutankhamun’s Wardrobe: Garments
from the Tomb of Tutankhamun, Rotterdam: van Doorn & Co.
Winlock, H.E. 1932. The Tomb of Queen Meryet-Amun at Thebes.
New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Winlock, H.E. 1945. The Slain Soldiers of Neb-hepet-Re’ Mentu-
hotep. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
9
The Musician-Priestesses of Ancient Egypt
Suzanne Onstine
uring the 3,000 years of pharaonic history, Egyp-
tian attitudes toward women remained much
more “female-friendly” than some of the other
cultures of the ancient Near East and Mediterra-
nean. Women had the same human and legal rights
as men. They could enter into business contracts
regarding land and movable property, make wills, divorce,
testify or be tried in court, etc. all without the patronage or
sponsorship of a male relative or husband. The legal word of
a woman was worth the same as that of a man. Although she
had the same legal rights and responsibilities, there was cer-
tainly a gender-based division of labor.
Egyptian civilization was still male-oriented. The political
and religious institutions were run by men. Additionally, the
artistic and written sources we have concerning ancient Egypt
were produced mainly by and for the male participants in
these institutions who were bureaucratic officials and scribes.
Consequently, our view of women and their role in society
comes from biased sources. For example, tombs of the no-
bility, which we so often use for information about their
society, were built for men and served as a monument to the
man and his career. Women seldom had their own tombs.
More often they were buried with their husbands or fathers.
The scenes in the men’s tombs revolve around his life and
duties and portray women and family in a supporting role.
Further, ancient Egyptian art is idealistic for both men and
women. The images we see in tombs contain more informa-
tion about how Egyptians thought things should be than
about reality.
Literature also provides us with information about the
social climate between the genders. A genre of writing called
wisdom literature is comprised of advice, usually from father
to son, detailing a righteous life. This sometimes included
advice on how to treat women, and gives us an impression
about how women were viewed.
A saying from the Middle Kingdom text, The Instruction
of Any reads, “Rank creates its own rules; a woman is asked
about her husband, and a man is asked about his rank”.
(Lichtheim 1976:140) This seems to summarize the prevail-
ing attitude about the ideal woman. Her primary responsi-
bilities and worth came from the private world of home life,
not the public world of administrative work and civic duty.
However, one never senses that society viewed this private
life of women as unimportant. There is no derision of the
housewife in literature or art. Her importance simply came
from an entirely different place than that of off icials with
rank and titles.
With such a situation, refining our knowledge about the
lives and pursuits of women becomes diff icult. The best way
to do that is by examining the contexts where the lives of
women intersect with the official, male-dominated world.
One area of public life on which women made some im-
pact was religion. Although men dominated the priesthood
throughout ancient Egyptian history, a significant number
of women held various titles indicating religious vocations.
Most of these had to do with music.
One of the most popular, non-royal titles found during
the Old Kingdom was Hmt nTr (“Hemet netjer”), used from
the 4th Dynasty until the end of the Middle Kingdom. The
title Hemet netjer means the female servant of the god, a
feminized version of the extremely common male title title
Hm nTr (“Hem netjer”), the male servant of the god, or priest.
These priests carried out most of the regular duties of the
temple assisted by various specialist priests and (wab) or “pure”
priests.
The Hemet netjer priestesses served in the cults of many
deities but were especially prominent in the cult of Hathor.
It appears that the early cult of Hathor was served predomi-
nantly by women, as fewer men from the Old and Middle
Kingdoms held the title title Hm nTr n @wt-Hr (“Hem netjer
of Hathor”). (Robins 1993:142) There were male administra-
tors and high priests at the top of the hierarchy because
these positions had administrative duties as well as priestly
ones, and were therefore f illed by men who were part of the
bureaucratic structure. But the daily duties of the cult rituals
– the responsibility of men in any other cult – seem to have
been performed mainly by women who were Hemet netjer
of Hathor.
The priestesses seem to have been particularly musically
inclined, probably not by accident, considering that Hathor
was the patroness of music. The image of a woman holding
the sacred symbols of Hathor, a sistrum and menat, in her
hands is very common throughout Egyptian history. The
priestesses would have used these to create rhythm for the
temple rites. They might also have sung or chanted along
with the rustling of the menat beads and the jingle of the
10
metal sistra rattles. Both instruments were believed to be
sacred symbols of the goddess and imparted her special bless-
ings and power – distinctly feminine attributes.
In fact, non-royal men are rarely depicted with a sistrum
or menat although exceptions do exist. This might be be-
cause of the objects’ association with Hathor, a goddess
closely linked to women’s concerns. Perhaps it was taboo or
unconventional for a man to use the sistrum and menat
because they were so deeply imbued with feminine power. If
that were the case, and if the daily offering to Hathor had to
include the use of these objects, men would have been un-
able to perform the proper offerings to the goddess in daily
cult rites. It may very well be that the duties of the job
necessitated women’s participation.
The middle of the second millennium BCE marked the
beginning of the New Kingdom, a dramatic new age for the
Egyptians and one marked by many changes in religious
practices. At first glance, it would appear that in the New
Kingdom women stopped playing a serious role in the reli-
gious life of ancient Egypt because the ubiquitous Hemet
netjer title all but disappears. In the New Kingdom, the Amun
priesthood had become more powerful than any cult in pre-
vious periods, so an increasingly professional cadre of priest-
administrators was needed to run the growing system. The
positions were also increasingly hereditar y rather than being
appointed by the king or high priests. These factors
marginalized women to some extent since administration
was not a traditional role for women, nor did they inherit
titles. However, this professionalism also meant that the priest-
hood had become somewhat secularized (Myíliwiec 1985:30)
still leaving room for the participation of women in some
form.
It was at this moment in history that the title (Smayt)
(“shmayt”), or “Chantress”, became common. (Onstine 2001)
Although there were sporadic instances of the title chanter/
chantress for both men and women in the 12th Dynasty, it
was not until the 18th Dynasty that it became the most
common title for a woman after nbt pr (“nebet per”), or
“Lady of the house”. The use of the title Chantress lasted
into the Ptolemaic era, although it is rare after the late 21st
Dynasty.
With the changing political and religious climate of the
early 18th dynasty, women’s roles in the temple hierarchy
needed to be reevaluated and integrated into the new sys-
tems. This process can even be traced back to the late 12th
Dynasty, hundreds of years earlier, when Senusret III insti-
tuted a series of governmental reforms which were probably
intended to break up the power of the established elite. Since
the women of these wealthy families usually held the title
Hemet netjer, this position may have been a casualty of
larger issues at the end of the Middle Kingdom.
The first appearances of the title shmayt in the Middle
Kingdom are on crude stelae, indicating a less-than-elite po-
sition for the women involved. Perhaps they were from new
bureaucratic families who had taken over the posts previ-
ously held by hereditary nobility.
Chantresses participating in
temple rites at Karnak in
Tuthmosis III’s festival
temple. Photo by author.
11
Because of the absence of the Hemet netjer title and the
need to offer music to the gods, the new designation of
chantress seems to have been created. It almost seems that
the chantresses took the place of the Hemet netjer priest-
esses in the religious hierarchy.
Despite these early beginnings, the title’s real rise in popu-
larity began during the reign of Hatshepsut many years later.
During her unusual 18th Dynasty reign, there were many
innovations in state and temple administration. (Spalinger
1998:251; Assmann 1989:71-82) There were also societal
changes. In general, since the beginning of the 18th dynasty,
women played a more visible role in society, with many fa-
mous royal women making a name for themselves in his-
tory. The wives and mothers of the early founders of the
18th Dynasty – Ahmose-Nefertari, Ahotep and Tetisheri –
played significant roles in the reunification and character of
the 18th Dynasty. Late 18th Dynasty queens such as Tiye
and Nefertiti also seem to have exercised great influence in
their own right.
It was also during Hatshepsut’s reign that off icials be-
gan to be buried in great numbers in the Theban hills,
now popularly known as the Tombs of the Nobles. And,
contrary to the decorative styles of previous periods,
women were now afforded a much more prominent posi-
tion in the tomb, offering to the gods and partaking of
the funerary offerings along with male family members.
They even dedicated their own stelae at sites such as
Aybdos.
These trends have been interpreted as evidence of an
increase in social or public roles for women. While hardly
a women’s liberation movement, it may represent a slight
shift toward a greater acceptance of women in religious
roles, both on a personal or family level and in larger,
state-sponsored cultic activities. (Whale 1989:241)
Hatshepsut popularized such state-sponsored cult ac-
tivities in the form of huge processions to accompany the
festivals of Opet (a royal and divine rejuvenation ceremony)
and the Beautiful Feast of the Valley (an elaborate festival
of the dead). New Kingdom processions were elaborate
affairs in which the images of the gods were taken out of
the temples and paraded through the streets for the popu-
lace to see. The gods were still hidden behind draperies,
but this was the closest most people ever got to their
gods, as entrance into the temple sanctuaries where the
gods resided was strictly forbidden to non-initiates. The
processions were always accompanied by a large contin-
gent of musicians, acrobats and dancers of both sexes,
including the chantresses. In Thebes, the gods Amun, Mut
and Khonsu were taken from their temples at Karnak and
paraded to Luxor temple for the Opet festival. For the
Beautiful Feast of the Valley they were also taken across
the river to visit the mortuary temples of dead kings, be-
stowing blessings on the private tombs they passed as
well. Mortuary temples, such as Hatshepsut’s at Deir el-
Bahari, were important resting places along the route where
the gods could commune with the souls of the dead kings.
These processions were a perfect way for women to serve
their gods. As musicians, they did not need to be full time
priestesses; they were employed as needed.
Even during the Amarna Period, musicians were still fre-
quently portrayed in ritual scenes and in depictions of the
palace. Music was part of the new religion, as the cultic
scenes from Amarna and on the talatat blocks from East
Karnak demonstrate. (Leprohon in Redford 1988: 47-51;
Manniche 1991b: 62ff; Gohary 1992: Pl. L, LI, CVII) A few
chantresses of the Aten are known, but with fewer gods and
temples to serve, the number of musician-priestesses briefly
declined.
The demise of Atenism and the return to orthodoxy is
evidenced by the numerous women who held the title
chantress of Amun in the short time period encompassing
the reigns of Tutankhamun, Aye, and Horemheb. The suc-
ceeding Ramesside Period sometimes appears to be a con-
tinual reassertion of orthodoxy as the period is marked by a
resurgence in personal piety. Large numbers of women from
more diverse economic backgrounds held the title of chantress
and were involved not only in the cult of Amun but of many
other local and state gods. Previously, only women from
elite families had held the titles of musician-priestesses. But
in the late New Kingdom, an increasing number of women
who were married to simple scribes and stable masters also
became chantresses.
Singers
Another New Kingdom title associated with temple worship
was Hsyt (“Hesyt”). This title was probably a more general
term for singer. The root of the word means to praise. The
Hesyt priestesses also served the gods through singing and
the use of sistra and menats. However, when we compare the
contexts of the two titles, it is clear that chantresses were
mainly involved in religious or royal ceremonies and were
accompanied by percussion instruments – hence the transla-
tion as chantress rather than singer. The Hesyt, however,
were also found in both religious contexts and less formal
entertainment scenes where they sang along with any combi-
nation of musicians playing lutes, lyres, oboes and harps.
(Onstine 2001:13-16)
Where the Hemet netjer priestesses of the Old and Middle
12
Kingdoms mainly served Hathor, and the chantresses of the
New Kingdom were largely in the service of Amun, the Hesyt-
singers of the New Kingdom were particularly devoted to
Mut, Amun’s consort at Thebes. New Kingdom and Third
Intermediate Period women sometimes concurrently held
the titles of chantress of Amun, singer of the temple of
Mut at Karnak, and “nurse of the child Khonsu”. In this
way they aligned themselves with the entire Theban triad, a
very politically savvy thing to do as the cult of Amun was
the most powerful in the countr y at that time.
Sistrum Players
There were also a few different titles that meant sistrum player,
iHyt, sxmyt, ssty being the main three. These titles were not
popular until the Third Intermediate Period and later, al-
though they are occasionally found in the New Kingdom as
well. The title chantress is rarely found after the 22nd Dy-
nasty so it seems that the popularity of the new sistrum
player designations coincides with the decline of the chantress
title, similar to the situation with the decline of the Old and
Middle Kingdoms Hemet netjer title and the rise in popular-
ity of the chantress title.
The Khener
There was also another institution associated with temple
music: namely the xnr (“khener”). The term is often mis-
translated as harem, a misleading word to use since the title
had nothing to do with either the segregation of women
from society or of women being the sexual property of any
individual. Most scholars now agree that the institution, and
the women who bore titles associated with it, were perform-
ers: musicians, dancers and acrobats. (Nord 1981) One spe-
cific title, wrt xnrt (“weret khenert”) “the great one of the
musical troupe,” was held by some of the most prominent
women of ancient Egypt including queens, princesses and
noblewomen.
It might be that khener was an overall term given to a
group of chantresses, singers and sistrum players as well as
dancers and acrobats, who came together in the service of a
specific god. During processions or other state occasions
where music was required, they could be called upon as a
group to provide the proper atmosphere and music for the
occasion.
Temples
Music was an integral part of religious ceremony, both in
public displays and in private temple ritual. One of the teach-
ings from The Instruction of Any reads, “Observe the feast
of your god ... song, dance, and incense are his foods”.
(Lichtheim 1976:136)
Epithets like the one given to Nefertiti show how crucial
the role of music played in worship and interaction with the
god: “She who pacifies the Aten with a sweet voice and
those hands of hers which carry the sistra”. (Troy 1986:192)
Other, similar epithets like “The one who pacifies the god
(Horus, Amun, or just the generic netjer) with her voice”
were used by many royal women. (op. cit.) Non-royal women
usually did not have epithets like these associating them
with deities.
One Hellenistic observer noted that the priests sang hymns
to their gods 3-4 times a day, during the prescribed daily
rituals at morning, noon, evening and night. (van der Horst
1982:69) The officiants purified themselves by washing with
water from the sacred lake at each temple. The priests and
priestesses then approached the shrine of the god, kept hid-
den in the heart of the temple away from the uninitiated.
They purified the shrine with incense and a libation of water
to clear away the sand. Then they opened the doors of the
shrine. For the morning rites, the priests changed the god’s
clothes (linen draped around the statue and any jewelry that
had been offered) and offered him or her food, drink and
incense. Subsequent rites during the day were probably less
elaborate and consisted of food and drink offerings, incense
purification and song. During all the rituals, the musicians
offered hymns as prayers to the accompaniment of sistra
and menats or clapping.
As discussed above, a main pattern that evolved through-
out Egyptian history was the switch from one title to an-
other during succeeding periods, such as the transition from
the Hemet netjer priestesses of the Old and Middle King-
doms to the chantresses of the New Kingdom, and from
chantresses to the later sistrum players. These changes may
have been influenced by politics. The king or his representa-
tives in the priesthood may have encouraged women to par-
ticipate in cultic activities as a way to strengthen the power
base of certain cults associated with kingship, specif ically
Hathor in the Old Kingdom and Amun in the New King-
dom and Third Intermediate Period.
This is especially probable because the increase in the
number of women who held musician-priestess titles coin-
cided with times when rulers were trying to build support.
For example, Hathor was closely associated with kingship in
the Old Kingdom. The priestesses of Hathor became most
numerous at the end of the Old Kingdom, when many schol-
ars theorize that the central government was falling apart.
Similarly, Amun was the state god of the New Kingdom and
the chantresses of Amun in the New Kingdom become
numerous during the reign of Hatshepsut, a woman who
definitely needed to build some bridges with the establish-
ment. The number of chantresses increased again in the
post-Amarna and early Ramesside periods – an era recover-
13
ing from the damage of Akhenaten’s policies and an age of
extreme devotion to the traditional gods.
The musician-priestesses were not only taking part in reli-
gious duties, they were also supporting the state religion and
the king by participating in the dominant economic and
political institutions of their times. This is important to rec-
ognize because it gives us a tiny glimpse of the political
nature of women’s behavior, an aspect that is otherwise not
evident in art or literature where the ideal woman was not
supposed to be concerned with affairs of state. Although
the musician-priestesses never held the same authority or
power as male priests, they nevertheless played an important
role in the religious and perhaps political life of ancient
Egypt.
REFERENCES
Assmann, J. 1989. “State and Religion in the New Kingdom,” in
Religion and Philosophy in Ancient Egypt. Yale Egyptological Stud-
ies 3. New Haven: Yale University.
Galvin, M. 1981. Priests and Priestesses of Hathor in the Old King-
dom and First Intermediate Period. Doctoral Dissertation,
Brandeis University.
Galvin, M. 1984. “The Hereditary Status of the Titles of the Cult
of Hathor”. JEA 70: 42-49.
Gillam, R. 1991. Topographical, Prosopographical and Historical Stud-
ies in the 14th Upper Egyptian Nome. Doctoral Dissertation;
Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Near Eastern
Studies.
Gillam, R. 1995. “Priestesses of Hathor: Their Function, Decline
and Disappearance”. JARCE 32: 211-237.
Gohry, J. 1992. Akhenaten’s Sed-festival at Karnak. London: Kegan
Paul International.
van der Horst, P. W. 1982. “The Way of Life of the Egyptian Priests
According to Chaeremon,” in Studies in Egyptian Religion Dedi-
cated to Professor Jan Zandee, M. Heerma van Voss, ed., pp. 61-
71. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Leprohon, R.J. 1988. “Cultic Activities in the Temple at Amarna”,
in D. Redford, The Akhenaten Temple Project. Volume 2: Rwd-
mnw, Foreigners and Inscriptions. ch. 5, p. 47-51. Toronto:
Akhenaten Temple Project and the University of Toronto Press.
Manniche, L. 1991. “Music at the Court of the Sun-Disk”. Amarna
Letters 1: 62-65.
Myíliwiec, K. 1985. Eighteenth Dynasty Before the Amarna
Period. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Nord, D. 1981. “The Term xnr: ‘Harem’ or ‘Musical Perform-
ers’?” in Studies in Honor of Dows Dunham. Studies in Ancient
Egypt, the Aegean, and the Sudan, W.K. Simpson and W. Davis,
eds., pp. 137-145. Boston: Museum of Fine Art.
Onstine, S. 2001. The Role of the Chantress
(^mayt)
in Ancient
Egypt. Doctoral Dissertation; Toronto: University of Toronto,
Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations.
Robins, G. Women in Ancient Egypt. Cambridge: Harvard Univer-
sity Press.
Spalinger, A. 1998. “The Limitations of Formal Ancient Egyptian
Religion”. JNES 57: 241-260.
Troy, L. 1986. Patterns of Queenship in Ancient Egyptian Myth and
History. Boreas 14. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis
Upsaliensis.
Whale, S. 1989. The Family in the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt: A
Study of the Representations of the Family in Private Tombs. Sydney:
The Australian Centre for Egyptology.
Dr. Suzanne Onstine is an Associate Director of the University
of Arizona Egyptian Expedition. She is President of the
Arizona chapter of ARCE and a professor of anthropology at
Pima Community College in Tucson, AZ.
14
Intersection of Text and Object:
Offering Tables and Cultic Performance
Harold Hays
ith countless examples surviving from all pe-
riods of Egyptian history, the offering table
was an object of enduring importance to the
ancient Egyptians. Its importance and use
might be presumed from the physical contexts
in which it has sometimes been found, such as in front of
false doors in Old Kingdom tombs. Just as the false door
served as a cultic focus during the performance of mortuary
services, the table, positioned between the false door and
the priestly officiants, evidently had an important place in
cultic performances.
One of the most frequent motifs on an offering table is
the carved shape of the heiroglyphic word hetep, which
often dominates the table’s decoration, as in the Old King-
dom table shown in Figure 1. In fact, the actual shape of
many offering tables is the heiroglyphic word hetep.1 From
the contexts in which this word appears in the Old King-
dom, it seems to have originally meant “to have needs or
desires satisfied”2, through receiving food and drink, mate-
rial recompense for services rendered, a suitable legal
arbitration, or other means. But the hieroglyphic sign for
this word represents a loaf of bread upon a mat — that is, a
presented offering — and hence hetep
often refers simply to an offering to a
god or a dead person.3 This last dimen-
sion of meaning provides an immedi-
ate indication of the use of offering
tables: they were objects over and upon
which items were ritually presented, es-
pecially foodstuffs. Indeed, so closely
connected was the offering table with
this meaning that the word hetep itself
could stand as a term for “offering
table”.4
The term hetep also appears in the
very common phrase hetep-di-nisut, “an
offering given of the king,” a phrase
bearing witness to the king’s role as ar-
chetypal off iciant in mortuary cult, just
as he was the archetypal off iciant in
temple cult. Hetep-di-nisut appears on
inscribed offering tables from the Old
Kingdom through to the end of phara-
onic history. It is perhaps the most frequently encountered
statement on offering tables, either standing alone or com-
bined with other statements to create an entire offering for-
mula.5 In the latter instance, hetep-di-nisut acts as a kind of
heading to one or more granted items, such as in one place
on the table in Figure 1, which reads, “An offering given of
the king: that he [the deceased] be given a thousand bread,
beer, beef, fowl, alabaster, oil and linen”.6 The part following
the heading of “An offering given of the king” constitutes
something granted to the deceased, corporeal items sym-
bolically representing the means for the continued life of his
incorporeal person. Items such as bread and beer were in-
deed presented during mortuary services, ideally performed
every day for the deceased person in order to secure for him
a beatified state.7 Figure 2 depicts such a presentation.
Besides the common hetep-shape of offering tables, also
noteworthy with respect to physical structure is their fre-
quent incorporation of libation channels and basins, both
of which were designed to receive liquids poured over and
onto the table’s platter. The function of the basins is made
clear by texts which can be wrapped around them, as on the
New Kingdom offering table of Sarenenutit, called Tjawy
Figure 1: An offering table from the Old Kingdom,
bearing hetep-design (after Borchardt 1937 pl. 4).
15
(see Figure 3): “This your libation, O’ Osiris Tjawy, true of
voice, gone forth because of [your] son, [gone forth because
of Horus — I have come,] even having brought you the eye
of Horus, that your [heart] be cool [by it]”.8 Though dam-
aged, the text can be restored since enough of it remains to
make it identifiable as the Pyramid Texts utterance 32, f irst
attested in the sarcophagus chamber of the pyramid of Unas,
the last king of Dynasty 5. Signif icantly, this utterance is
from the offering ritual, a sequence of rites within mortuary
service.
Even more significantly, though first attested in the pyra-
mids, this utterance is attested in all periods of pharaonic
history, down to the Ptolemaic. The text owes its longevity
to its membership in the offering ritual, as the offering ritual
was known throughout all these periods. Thus, in addition
to its literal content, the text’s ritual context emphasizes the
table’s position in the culture which produced it: it was a
cultic implement, something over which rites were performed
and texts like this recited. At the same time, the table as a
physical object imparts a real-world context for this and other
utterances: they, too, had a reality beyond mere words; they
were cultic recitations.
Equally important is the fact that texts like the one from
Sarenenutit’s table took on a life of their own beyond ritual’s
bonds of tradition, inasmuch as they became subject to the
creative genius of variation.9 For example, the Ptolemaic of-
fering table of Neferibre (Figure 4) bears the text: “O’ Osiris
Khentimentiu, let me give you this libation gone forth be-
cause of your son, gone forth because of Horus; let me
bring you the efflux gone forth from you!”10 Numerous of-
fering tables bear further variations of the ancient libation
text.
Because of their often explicit association with the act of
libation, it is natural that another Egyptian word for offer-
ing table, wedehu or wedjehu, is derived from wedeh, mean-
ing “to pour out”.11 Figure 5 shows how this word is
sometimes written. But even with the etymological connec-
tion of wedehu to the act of pouring out, and even with
many of these tables being designed to physically receive
liquids, their function was not limited to libation, for some
texts speak of “bread and beer being given to you upon the
offering table (wedjehu), of Khentimentiu”.12 It is evident,
therefore, that offering tables in general were employed in
several different rites, including rites of presenting bread,
beer, and libation.
Moreover, although the texts mentioned so far were all
inscribed for dead persons, offering tables were employed
not only in mortuary service but also in temple cult. This
can be inferred from the last text, which intriguingly speaks
of offerings presented “to you,” a dead man, “upon the
wedjehu of Khentimentiu,” a god. But the same term wedjehu,
as used in the tale of the Westcar Papyrus, is more directly
associated with temple cult, when a group of gods is in-
formed that kings will “endow your khaut and make your
wedjehu flourish”.13 A further indication of an offering table’s
suitability to both mortuary service and temple cult is found
in this last passage’s use of the term khaut, yet another word
for “offering table.” For it, too, may be found in the context
of service for the dead, as when the deceased is to be equipped
with a khaut during a rite in the offering ritual. The affinities
between mortuary service and temple cult are underscored
by their common use of the same implement — the very
platform upon which the means for future and further life is
offered.14 In this regard, the Coffin Texts provide a spell
intriguing for its uniting service for the gods with service for
the dead: “May you [the deceased] eat bread from the khaut
of Re, of the great ones within the gates”.15 As with the
wedjehu of Khentimentiu discussed above, one has here a
dead man receiving items from the offering table of a god.
The offering table was integral to cultic performances for
Figure 2: From an Old Kingdom
depiction of a rite in mortuary service,
the presentation of bread and beer (after
Junker 1944, p. 167).
Figure 3: From the platter of the offering table of Sarenenutit, showing
libation basin with remnants of Pyramid Texts
utterance 32 wrapped around it (drawing Hays,
from photo of Clére 1981, pl. XXV).
16
both the dead and for the gods, from its very shape and
design, to the words inscribed upon it, to the contexts in
which words for “offering table” appear. For us today, each
one of these different kinds of evidence complements our
understanding of the others. The physical table is not only
a sculpted block of stone able to be appreciated for aes-
thetic reasons but it is also an object over which sacred rites
Figure 5: Some Egyptian terms for offering table;
from left to right, hetep, wedehu, and khaut.
were once actually performed. Texts upon it were not only
decorative but were of the sort anciently recited over it. And
the ancient authors of words concerning it were making
reference to objects that have survived to us today.
NOTES
1. For example, the 25th Dynasty offering table of the God’s
Wife, Shepenwepet, found at Medinet Habu, on which see
Uvo Hölscher 1954 The Excavation of Medinet Habu,
Volume V: Post-Ramessid Remains. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, p. 28 with fig. 31.
2. Compare the similar interpretation of Alan Gardiner in Nina
de Garis Davis and Alan H. Gardiner 1915 The Tomb of
Amenemhet (No. 82). London: Egypt Exploration Fund, p. 80,
where the word is held to literally mean “‘satisfaction’, ‘con-
Figure 4: An offering table from the Ptolemaic period bearing
a libation text, ultimately derived from Pyramid Texts
utterance 32 (after Kamal 1909, pl. XXXIX).
tentment’, and refers to the feelings aroused by the presenta-
tion of offerings”.
3. As noted by Regina Hölzl 2002 Ägyptische Opfertafeln und
Kultbecken. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag, pp. 133-134, it sym-
bolizes the deceased being provisioned with offerings.
4. See Kurt Sethe 1908-1910 Die altäegyptischen Pyramidentexte,
2 vols. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs, section 102a.
5. For further detail on the components of the offering for-
mula, see Winfried Barta 1968 Aufbau und Bedeutung de
altäegyptishchen Opferformel. Gluckstadt: J.J. Augustin, pp. xiv-
xv.
6. Author’s translation of text in Ludwig Borchardt 1937
Denkmäler des Alten Reiches (ausser den Statuen), Part 1 (Cata-
logue Générale vol. 97). Berlin: Reichsdruckerei, p. 13 and pl. 4.
7. For a summarized description of mortuary ritual, see Ann
Macy Roth 2002 “Funerary Ritual” in Donald B. Redford, ed.,
The Ancient Gods Speak: A Guide to Egyptian Religion. New York:
Oxford University Press, pp. 147-154.
8. Author’s translation of text in J.J. Clére 1981 “Le table
d’offrandes de l’échanson royal Sa-Rénénoutet surnommé
Tchaouy” in Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale,
81, Suppliment, p. 219 and pl. XXV.
9. This phenomenon was first observed by Friedrich von Bissing
1901 “Zur Geschichte der Libationsformeln” in Recueil de travaux
relatifs à la philologie et à l’archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes,
23, pp. 38-47.
10. Author’s translation of text in Ahmed Bey Kamal 1909
Tables d’offrandes (Catalogue Générale vols. 46-47). Cairo: Institut
Français d’Archéologie Orientale, p. 115 and pl. XXXIX.
11. As it is used, for example, in the Pyramid Texts; see Sethe
1908-1910, section 2067b: “with a libation being poured out at
the gate”.
12. Author’s translation of text in Journal of Egyptology 20 (1934),
p. 158, pl.12. The statement is evidently derived from an utter-
ance found also in the Pyramid Texts (see Sethe 1908-1910,
section 474c: “its thousand of bread and beer upon the wedjehu
of Khentimentiu”.
13. Author’s translation of text from A.M/ Blackman 1988 The
Story of King Kheops and the Magicians. Kent: J.V. Books. On
this passage, see Harold M. Hays 2002 “the Historicity of Papy-
rus Westcar” in Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache 129, pp. 28-29
with note 71.
14. On other affinities between mortuary service and temple
cult, see Harold M. Hays 2002 “The Worshipper and the Wor-
shipped in the Pyramid Texts” in Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur
30, pp. 153-167.
15. Author’s translation of text in Adriaan de Buck 1935 The
Egyptian Coffin Texts I (Texts of Spells 1-75). Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, pp. 192I-193a.
Harold M. Hays is a Ph.D. candidate in Egyptology at the
University of Chicago and an epigrapher with the Epigraphic
Survey of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
17
A lecture presented to the ESS by Ellen LeBlanc
15 July 2002
Summarized by Anita McHugh
It has often been said that Egyptian civilization was com-
plete by the 4th Dynasty. If so, something substantial must
have come before this in order to lay the firm foundation
for the Egyptian civilization and culture. The vast majority
of the elements of Pharaonic civilization have their roots in
the very distant prehistoric past. The earliest evidence of
humans in Egypt is mostly of Neolithic cultures, during the
last part of the Stone Age, when people were making f ine
tools and beginning to domesticate plants and animals.
Dating remains of very ancient sites has always been a
difficult problem. There are four methods used for dating
such artifacts.
The first and most valuable is the Sequence Dating Chart
developed by Sir Flinders Petrie. In 1901, he announced his
system of relative dating of artifacts from the grave goods in
thousands of graves at Naqada, which he had excavated.
This system is based on stylistic changes in pottery, slate
palettes, etc. In 1947, Carbon-14 dating was developed. This
method uses a small piece of organic matter and is based on
the rate of decay of a radioactive isotope of carbon, C-14.
The results of C-14 dating are by no means as perfect as
once thought. C-14 results are compared with the results of
other methods of dating, such as dendrochronology, or tree
ring dating. In tree ring dating, the relative size of each an-
nual tree ring forms a pattern due to the climate. Charts for
tree ring dating are based on the type of wood and the site
or climate in which it was grown. The results of C-14 and
dendrochronology are averaged to give a date for the arti-
fact.
A much more recently developed dating method for f ired
clay like pottery is thermoluminescence. This method uses
the fact that minerals absorb radioactivity at a certain rate.
When an item is fired above 500°C, it releases the entire
radioactivity, essentially restarting its clock. These three tests
are generally used to substantiate the sequence dating. Dat-
ing rock art is more of a problem. The best method is to
compare the rock art with art on pottery.
The earliest peoples of North Africa did not settle along
the Nile River. During the Early and Middle Paleolithic pe-
riods, the climate varied between arid and wet. Thus, the
inhabitants moved from sites near the oases and the Nile to
other places far out in the deserts when savannas existed
there. Due to the climate variations, the Nile f low varied
widely. Older deposits from relative dry periods have been
The Prehistory of Egypt, or How It All Began
almost totally eradicated by the intervening periods when
the river flow was much greater. Early sites are nothing more
than places where people camped. These early sites yield
stone choppers and hand tools. The earliest burial from Egypt
is that of a child found near the temple of Dendera, dated to
about 55000 BCE. There are several Late Acheulean sites in
the Western Desert related to wetter periods when life as
hunter-gatherers was possible. Many Late Paleolithic sites have
been found in Upper Egypt.
Because of climatic changes brought about by the last Ice
Age, the rains returned about 14000 BCE. There was a great
wet period from about 12000 until 7500 BCE. During this
time, the people returned to the savannas of the Sahara. This
was a time of catastrophic floods of the Nile, with floods
reaching eight or nine meters above normal and erasing any
trace of human occupation along the Nile. During this pe-
riod, at one site near Qena, fish were caught in sophisticated
baskets and nets, and then smoked. Also from this time,
excavators found a cemetery at Gebel Sahara with stone f lakes
imbedded in the bones and skulls of 24 human skeletons,
suggesting they were killed in some type of warfare. There
has also been rock art found in the Nile Valley at Gerf Hussein
from this same time period.
As the rains increased, people returned to the Sahara where
life was more productive, during the early Neolithic from
11000 to 6800 BCE. Hunting and gathering continued and
the domestication of cattle began. Between 6500-4000 BCE,
human occupation of the Western Desert reached its peak,
with numerous sites, wells, wattle-and-daub constructions and
slab-lined houses. By 8000 BCE, there is evidence of domes-
ticated cattle and the cultivation of emmer wheat and barley.
By 7000 BCE, the people living in the savannas of the West-
ern Desert had made decorated pottery, lived in huts and
were sedentary for at least part of the year. From around
6000 BCE at Nabta Playa, excavators have found a large
megalithic complex, with an underground chamber contain-
ing the remains of a long-horned bull. This was clearly a
public structure and represents a change in social complex-
ity. As the climate dried, people were forced to migrate back
toward the oases and the Nile.
While there is evidence for civilization in the Western
Desert, there is no evidence for human presence in the Nile
Valley between 11,000 and 8,000 BCE. It is likely that some
inhabitants stayed in that area and dealt with the climatic
18
change. However, the remains of the occupation are covered
with alluvial silt deposits.
There are several Nile Valley sites, inhabited between 8000
and 3500 BCE, that have been discovered and excavated.
These include el-Kab, Helwan (near Cairo), the Faiyum Oa-
sis, Maadi (now a part of modern Cairo), Merimda, el-Omari,
Buto, Sais, and the sites of the separate Badarian and Tarifian
cultures.
The most impressive of these sites today is el-Kab. The site
is located along a silting-up branch of the Nile, about 75km
south of modern-day Luxor, where people made summer
camps, hunted the game and fished in the entrapped water.
They apparently did not make pottery or practice agricul-
ture. At the same time, the Faiyum was occupied with people
whose main occupation was fishing. Helwan was also occu-
pied and here there is some evidence of trade between the
people of Helwan and the people inhabiting the Mediterra-
nean coast of Egypt. These Nilotic peoples do not seem to
have been as culturally advanced as the inhabitants of the
Eastern and Western Deserts.
About 5500 to 3000 BCE, the Sahara began to grow even
more arid, forcing the herders and farmers to migrate to-
ward the oases and the Nile River Valley. They mingled with
the existing hunter-gatherers and brought their domesticated
animals and crops with them. It was this mingling of the
more advanced Saharans and the Nilotic peoples that really
began the predynastic period of Egyptian history.
There were early cultures using ceramics and domesticat-
ing cattle in the eastern Sahara. Thus the Faiyum appears to
be one of the first areas occupied as people moved back
toward the river during the extreme dry period of the sixth
millennium BCE.
There were two Faiyum cultures, A and B. Faiyum B is the
earlier culture and its people were true hunter-gatherers. The
Faiyum A culture used many complex flaked stone tools
and the origins of some of their techniques can be traced
back to the Middle East. They had a coarse pottery, used
sandstone mortars and pestles, and carved palettes from lime-
stone or diorite. These palettes are important artifacts for
sequence dating as they change throughout the predynastic
period. The most important animal remains in the Faiyum
are those of domesticated goats, sheep, cattle and pigs. The
goats and sheep appear to have originated in the Middle
East, as there is no trace in Africa of wild ancestors for these.
No cemeteries from this period have been found.
Because of the mixture of both Saharan and Middle East-
ern traits, the Faiyum seems to have been a culture at the
intersection of four routes, one from the eastern Sahara, one
from the Mediterranean coast, one from the Near East, and
one from the Red Sea and across the Nile Valley itself.
The Merimda culture is found about 45 km northwest of
Cairo and has 5 levels dating between 6000 and 3500 BCE.
Merimda is one of the earliest settled cultures in the Nile
Delta. Located on the western edge of the delta, it was the
first known farming village in Lower Egypt. Merimda exca-
vations uncovered an anthropomorphic figure and f igures
of cattle at Level 1, the earliest known examples of Egyptian
sculpture in the round. In the village were found traces of a
reed enclosure fence. It was laid out across the ground and
very well preserved. It was made of lines of stalks bound
together by two horizontal ties, as is still done today to
provide cattle enclosures. Burials at Merimda were in aban-
doned parts of the village, although children were also bur-
ied under the houses. The site of Merimda shows a long
occupation of a single site during which period a sedentary
lifestyle became dominant. There is some speculation that
Level 1 shows many Middle Eastern inf luences. These in-
clude pear-shaped mace heads (as seen later in the mace
heads of Scorpion and Narmer, footed pots, emmer wheat,
flax, sheep and goats). Spinning and weaving are also thought
to be innovations brought in from the Middle East.
The site of el-Omari, 3 km north of Helwan, was occu-
pied roughly from 4600 to 4400 BCE. It consists of three
separate, small sites that are very close to each other. The
pattern of settlement suggests an egalitarian society. The
pottery found here has little in common with that found in
the Faiyum and Merimda. It is more similar to that of Pales-
tine, both in technology and shape. Here there is some evi-
dence of the beginning of social differentiation. The skeleton
of a man who was apparently a chief was found holding a
wooden staff. The people of el-Omari raised and ate goats,
sheep, pigs and cattle, supplemented with fish. There is evi-
dence that animals grazed in the f ields and that fodder was
stored to feed them, as is done today. The site C of el-Omari
is significant in that the remains of donkeys are f irst found
here.
The Badarian culture found at Hemmameih has been dated
from 5500 to 3800 BCE. This site revealed a vertical stratifi-
cation showing the sequence of cultures from Badarian to
the late Predynastic. Their cemeteries were located outside
the community in the low desert edge. The pottery from the
graves is some of the finest thin-walled ware ever produced
without a wheel. Grave goods also included ivory combs,
siltstone palettes, copper pins and beads, leather bags and
turquoise. The turquoise and copper are believed to have
come from the Sinai. The Badarian culture produced Egypt’s
first tomb robbers. Evidence was found that many of the
tombs had been robbed soon after interment. The tombs at
Badari demonstrate a marked social differentiation with an
increase in the quality and number of exotic grave goods.
19
Maadi is located 10 km north of el-Omari and trade domi-
nated its culture. It had active and strong contacts with Pal-
estine and Syria. The houses of Maadi are of a type found
only in the Levant. There is also distinctive, imported Pales-
tinian pottery as well as Naqada-style pottery. One of the
earliest uses of stone in building is found in a cellar here.
Copper may have been important in the economy of Maadi,
and raw ore, probably from the Sinai, was smelted by the
Maadians. Other sites with the Maadi culture are in
Heliopolis, Wadi Digla and Buto.
Radiocarbon-dated prehistoric phases in Egypt, Lower Nubia
and Sudan (after Kaiser: 1985 Abb: 10).
About 95 km east of Alexandria is the site of Buto at the
town of the same name. It is believed to be the main delta
center shown on the Narmer Palette. The early phases of the
settlement are from the Maadi culture. Artifacts have been
found at Buto that closely resemble those found in Uruk
and used to decorate temple facades, as well as potsherds
with decoration characteristic of Syrian ware. There is evi-
dence that trade was conducted by sea.
In her lecture, Ms. LeBlanc traced the development of
human civilization in Egypt from the distant past in the
Pleistocene era, to the time when Egypt as we know it was
about to explode upon the scene. The basis for this explo-
sion was the domestication of animals, the development of
agriculture with the knowledge of the Nile f lood behavior
needed for success, and the beginnings of technology and
foreign trade. Ms. LeBlanc traced the peoples from small,
wandering bands of hunter-gatherers to sedentary peoples
who had culture, religion and some knowledge of the world
outside their own village. Without the knowledge and skills
that they developed, the Egypt that we know could not have
emerged.
Note: Ms. Leblanc will continue the Prehistoric develop-
ment of Egypt with a discussion of the Naqada I, II
and III cultures, as well as the Dynasties 00 and 0, in
another lecture to the ESS in the spring of 2003.
20
House of Scrolls
The Cult of Ra
by Stephen Quirke 2001
Thames & Hudson, London 184 pp.
$29.95 hardcover; ISBN 0500051070
Reviewed by Susan Cottman
Trapped within the sprawling Cairo metropolis lies the heart
of the ancient Egyptians’ sun cult, Iunu (also known as
Heliopolis, On and Tell Hisn). While little remains and exca-
vation has been limited, the inf luence of Iunu and its cult is
preserved throughout Egypt in temples and tombs.
Stephen Quirke, a curator at the Petrie Museum of Egyp-
tian Archaeology at University College, London, reconstructs
the worship of Ra through religious texts, art, architecture
and pharaonic cult practices spanning nearly the entire length
of ancient Egyptian history.
Quirke divides his examination into several chapters: The
Mythology of Ra; The Sun Cult and the Measurement of
Time; Iunu – Lost City of Ra-Atum; Solar Spires – Pyramids
and Obelisks; and The Exclusive Son – Akhenaten. Quirke
first examines myths and art for the names, objects and
animals, such as Atum, the benben, the scarab beetle and
the benu bird (heron) that are at the center of the sun cult.
In the second chapter, The Sun Cult and the Measure-
ment of Time, the author examines the relationship between
the king and Ra, as it is expressed in the so-called Books of
the Dead inscribed on kings’ tombs during the New King-
dom. The sun and the king are always on the move during
their dangerous solar journey in two boats, the Mesketet
during the night and the Mandjet during the day. The sun
and the king die at each sunset and are reborn at dawn in a
perpetual cycle of life and death. Quirke also examines solar
hymns found in the tombs of the Theban elite, perhaps sung
daily to the sun and evidence of non-royal cult practices.
The reader is introduced to Iunu, the once-magnificent
city of Ra, in chapter three. This chapter is particularly im-
portant because few popular books give Iunu more than a
brief mention. Its Greek name, not surprisingly, means “City
of the Sun”. The Egyptians called its temple Iunu Hut aat, or
the Great Shrine. Although the only surviving royal monu-
ment is an obelisk erected by Senusret I in the Middle King-
dom, structures may have been built as early as the Old
Kingdom. Whenever the f irst religious structures appeared,
the temple precinct at Iunu dwarfed even Karnak’s, as illus-
trated in a scale comparison on page 91. Quirke cites Egyp-
tologist David Jeffreys’ research that suggests the sun temple
faced east, toward the desert, “fronted by a monumental
gateway flanked by obelisks ... A temple not quite like any
other, but leaving clues to itself as echoes around the coun-
try.
Pyramids and obelisks are the subject of chapter four. Both
architectural types date to the Old Kingdom. The tip of the
pyramid was named benenet, the stone of the benben, which
refers to the primeval mound at Iunu. Yet Quirke cautions
the reader to not assume that pyramids are strictly solar monu-
ments. He cites Kate Spence’s recent research on a possible
stellar orientation of the pyramids as evidence for the com-
plicated significance of the pyramid and its complex.
Quirke suggests that the 6th Dynasty pharaohs developed
the obelisk as an expression of the royal solar cult. Could
the obelisk be the equivalent of the 4th Dynasty royal cult
complex and the 5th Dynasty royal sun temples? Quirke
describes the obelisk’s purpose as a monument “to capture
the spark of life at first dawn, for the eternal regeneration of
the king and creation”. Whatever the reason, subsequent pha-
raohs continued the practice of erecting obelisks at Iunu,
Thebes, Pi-Ri’amsese and Tanis. The largest obelisk, built by
Hatshepsut, was nearly 100 feet (30 meters) high.
Akhenaten is the subject of the final chapter. His father,
Amenhotep III, was not content to join with the sun disk
after death. He deified himself during his reign and became
the Shining Sun Disk of All Lands. His iconoclastic son
took this to “logical extremes” by banning worship of all
other gods except Aten, the sun disk. The changes f irst ap-
peared at Thebes early in Akhenaten’s reign and became fully
realized at his new capital and city of the sun, Akhetaten.
Quirke describes it this way: “… the new king focused all cult
on his father the sun disk, a practice reinforced perhaps by
the assonance of the Egyptian words it ‘father’ and itn ‘sun
disk’”. He suggests that this sweeping change was a plausible
reason for the much-debated Amarna art style. Quirke’s dis-
cussion of Akhenaten’s heretical brand of solar worship is
one of the best in recent books that deal with the subject.
Thankfully, he does not ask the reader to endure yet another
fruitless speculation about Marfan’s syndrome or other medi-
cal conditions that attract sensationalism.
The Cult of Ra is essential for anyone interested in ancient
Egyptian religion, architecture and funerary beliefs. The three
are inexorably bound together, as Quirke’s book so ably
demonstrates.