Content uploaded by Stanisław Wacławek
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Stanisław Wacławek on Dec 19, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0034 ECOL CHEM ENG S. 2016;23(3):473-482
Pavel HRABÁK
1
, Martina HOMOLKOVÁ
1*
, Stanisław WACŁAWEK
1
and Miroslav ČERNÍK
1
CHEMICAL DEGRADATION OF PCDD/F
IN CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT
CHEMICZNA DEGRADACJA PCCD/F
W ZANIECZYSZCZONYM SEDYMENCIE
Abstract: Due to the extreme toxicity of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F), the
remediation of PCDD/F aquifer source zones is greatly needed; however, it is very difficult due to their persistence
and recalcitrance. The potential degradability of PCDD/F bound to a real matrix was studied in five systems: iron
in a high oxidation state (ferrate), zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI), palladium nanopowder (Pd),
a combination of nZVI and Pd, and persulfate (PSF). The results were expressed by comparing the total toxicity of
treated and untreated samples. This was done by weighting the concentrations of congeners (determined using
a standardized GC/HRMS technique) by their defined toxicity equivalent factors (TEF). The results indicated that
only PSF was able to significantly degrade PCDD/F. Toxicity in the system decreased by 65% after PSF
treatment. Thus, we conclude that PSF may be a potential solution for in-situ remediation of soil and groundwater
at PCDD/F contaminated sites.
Keywords: PCDD/F, ferrate, nZVI, Pd, persulfate, degradation
Introduction
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF)
are without doubt the highest priority groups of pollutants. They belong to the first groups
of pollutants (called the Dirty Dozen) to be inscribed under the Stockholm Convention on
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in 2001. The aim of this convention is to protect
human health and the environment from harmful and widely distributed chemicals by
requiring its parties to eliminate or reduce the release of POPs into the environment [1].
Contrary to all other POPs, PCDD/F were never intentionally produced as
organochlorinated pesticides as they are exclusively impurities/by-products with a varying
origin. PCDD/F are highly toxic for human health and wildlife, remain intact in the
environment for long periods of time, are widely distributed throughout the environment,
and bioaccumulate in fatty tissues of humans and animals. Their toxic effect is mediated
1
Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Interdisciplinary Studies & the Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced
Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 1402/2 Liberec, 46117, Czech
Republic, phone +420 485 353 848, fax +420 485 353 696
*
Corresponding author: martina.homolkova@tul.cz
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Pavel Hrabák, Martina Homolková, Stanisław Wacławek and Miroslav Černík
474
through the interaction with an intracellular protein, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)
[2], which occurs in most vertebrate tissues and affects a number of other regulatory
proteins. The toxicity of PCDD/F depends on the number and position of the chlorine
atoms in their molecule. Congeners with chlorines in the 2, 3, 7, and 8 positions have the
highest affinity to the AH receptor and are therefore significantly harmful. Seven dioxins
and ten furans have chlorines in these relevant positions and are considered toxic by the
WHO-TEQ scheme (World Health Organization Toxic Equivalent) [2]. The most toxic
dioxin is reported to be 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), which is the strongest
known human carcinogen according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer
[3]. On the contrary, PCDD/F containing between one and three chlorine atoms are not
considered to be toxicologically serious, whereas other organic molecules, for example
coplanar PCB or polychlorinated naphthalenes, possess dioxin-like toxicity [4, 5].
The WHO-TEQ scheme was adopted internationally as the most appropriate way of
estimating the potential health risks of mixtures of PCDD/F as there are 75 PCDD and
135 PCDF possible congeners. The total TEQ value expresses the total sample toxicity as if
only TCDD congener would be present. Each of the seven dioxin and ten furan toxic
congeners is given a toxicity ranking called the toxic equivalency factor (TEF) from 0 to 1,
where the reference congener is TCDD which by definition has a TEF = 1. Their
concentration is then weighted by their TEF, which gives a congener contribution to the
sample TEQ. Alternatively to calculating the specific congener contributions after
GC/HRMS determination, a screening method based on cell-line with sensitized AHR
could be used [4].
The remediation of PCDD/F contaminated soil is generally very difficult.
Post-excavation soil cleaning methods mostly employ physical or chemical methods like
thermal treatment [6, 7], surfactant washing [8, 9] or base-catalysed decomposition [10] of
PCDD/F.
In this paper, we studied the potential degradation of PCDD/F bound to a real soil
matrix by applying five different oxidants and reductants with a potential for in-situ
remediation. Two extreme oxidation states of iron were tested: Fe
0
nanoparticles
(zero-valent iron nanoparticles, nZVI) and Fe
+6
(ferrate, Fe(VI)). Ferrate is a very strong
oxidant whose superior performance for environmental remediation has been demonstrated
in various recent researches [11-13]. On the other hand, ZVI in the form of nanoparticles is
a strong reductant with a large specific surface and has been utilized for groundwater
remediation and wastewater treatment [14, 15]. The second metal having a potential
dechlorination capability was the catalytic, noble metal palladium in the form of
a nanopowder. A combination of Pd and nZVI was also studied as it has been reported that
such a combination improves the degradation rates of chlorinated compounds [16, 17]
including PCDD/F [18, 19]. Finally, heat-activated PSF was tested as sulfate and hydroxyl
radical generator. SO
4•-
and OH
•
are one of the strongest known oxidants used for in situ
chemical oxidation in the remediation of soil and groundwater [20].
Materials and methods
Chemicals
PCDD/F was used in the form of an industrial sandy soil certified reference material
(BCR 529) [21] obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Information on the presence of the certified
concentrations of PCDD/F is given in Table 1. The certified values were not available for
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Chemical degradation of PCDD/F in contaminated sediment
475
all of the congeners presented in the material; however, the concentrations of the other
congeners were determined through analysis and were in good agreement with the data
obtained by Antunes et al [22]. The toxicity equivalent factors (TEF) [23] used for dioxins
are also given in Table 1.
Table 1
Composition of the certified reference material [21] and the TEF values [23]
PCDD/F (#) Certified value
[µg/kg] Uncertainty
[µg/kg] TEF
2,3,7,8-TCDD (D1) 4.5 0.6 1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD (D2) 0.44 0.05 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD (D3) 1.22 0.21 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD (D4) 5.4 0.9 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD (D5) 3.0 0.4 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD (D6) - - 0.01
OCDD (D7) - - 0.001
2,3,7,8-TCDF (F1) 0.078 0.013 0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF (F2) 0.145 0.028 0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF (F3) 0.36 0.07 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF (F4) 3.4 0.5 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF (F5) 1.09 0.15 0.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF (F6) 0.37 0.05 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF (F7) 0.022 0.010 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF (F8) - - 0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF (F9) - - 0.01
OCDF (F10) - - 0.001
Potassium ferrate was provided by the company LAC. The content of Fe was
determined by elemental analysis as being 25.5% Fe. Room temperature
57
Fe Mossbauer
spectroscopy determined the iron oxidation states as follows: 5% Fe(V), 7% Fe(VI) and
88% of Fe(III). This implies that the ferrate powder contained 5.5% K
3
FeO
4
and
6.5% K
2
FeO
4
.
Standard NANOFER 25P nZVI (NANO IRON, s.r.o., Olomouc, Czech Republic) was
used in the form of a dry powder preserved in an inert nitrogen atmosphere. The particles
were without surface modification and had an average size of 50 nm, average surface area
of 20-25 m
2
/g and a narrow size distribution of 20-100 nm. The content of iron was high,
ranging between 80 and 90 wt. %. An aqueous suspension of Fe
0
was prepared from the
powder at a ratio of 1:4 nZVI:water, which yielded a suspension with an nZVI content of
200 g Fe
0
/dm
3
.
Palladium nanopowder (< 25 nm) with purity 99.9% was obtained from Aldrich.
Sodium persulfate (PSF) of p.a. quality was obtained from Penta.
Methods
A total of 1.0 g of the certified BCR-329 material was placed into each reactor
containing 522.5 cm
3
of demineralized water and stirred vigorously for 30 minutes. After
that, the appropriate reactant (Fe(VI), nZVI, Pd, Pd+nZVI and PSF) was added. The
reaction times differed in accordance to the reactant used. The dosed amounts of the
individual chemicals together with durations of reactions are summarized in Table 2. The
reaction of PCDD/F with Fe(VI) and nZVI was performed in triplicate and the reaction
with Pd, Pd+nZVI and PSF in duplicate. The base samples consisting of water and PCDD/F
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Pavel Hrabák, Martina Homolková, Stanisław Wacławek and Miroslav Černík
476
only were repeated nine times in total with reaction times ranging from 3 to 60 days, thus
covering all of the different reaction times used in this study. PSF was activated by heat,
namely at 50°C, during the whole reaction time.
Table 2
Dosed amounts and the reaction times
Reaction time
*
Fe(VI) nZVI Pd PSF
Base 3-60 days - - - -
Fe(VI) 3 days 1.0 g - - -
nZVI 60 days - 5.0 g - -
Pd 22 days - - 0.1 g -
Pd+nZVI 22 days - 5.0 g 0.1 g -
PSF 7 days - - - 10.0 g
*
reaction times were chosen on the previous experience with reagents reactivity - no remaining reducing/oxidizing
effect is supposed to persist in reactors at the end of the reaction time
Analytical methods
The samples were processed in a commercial laboratory (ALS) by the standard
extraction and cleaning procedure for PCDD/F, including the addition of the appropriate
13
C
12
labelled internal standards according to EN 1948-2 [24]. The separation, identification
and determination of PCDD/F in the extracts containing the standards for determining the
recoveries were performed using GC/HRMS according to EN 1948-3 [25]. The seventeen
congeners listed in Table 1 were determined.
Results and discussion
For clarity and simplification, all of the results were expressed as toxicity equivalency
values (TEQ), which is a summary parameter evaluating the congener concentration
weighted by its TEF.
The composition of the base samples was determined and the results were expressed as
TEQ of each PCDD/F congener in each base sample as shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the
TEQ contribution of each average PCDD/F congener to the overall toxicity of the average
base sample is shown in Figure 2. The total TEQ of the average base was determined
as 11.138 ng/g.
It is apparent from Figure 2 that almost two thirds (specifically 6.8 ng/g, which
corresponds to 61.1%) of the overall TEQ resulted from the D1 congener. The other
relatively high contributions (but significantly lower in comparison to D1) were 7.4% and
6.0% for D4 and D6, respectively. The lowest TEQ was exhibited by F1, F2 and F9.
PCDD/F samples were treated by iron in its two extreme oxidation states, Fe
0
(nZVI)
and Fe
+6
(Fe(VI), ferrate), by palladium nanopowder (Pd), by a combination of Pd with
nZVI and by PSF. The overall results of this study are summarized in Figure 3 where the
columns represent summary TEQ values of all of the congeners. With the exception of the
PSF treated samples, no significant degradation of the sum of PCDD/F was observed for
any of the reactants. A distinct decrease in the overall PCDD/F toxicity and thus overall
PCDD/F content was caused solely by PSF. This decrease was from 11.1 to 3.9 ng/g, which
corresponded to 65%.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Chemical degradation of PCDD/F in contaminated sediment
477
Fig. 1. TEQ of individual congeners in base samples
Fig. 2. Contribution of individual congeners to the overall toxicity of the base
Contrary to the PSF treated sample and to our presumption, the TEQ in ferrate treated
samples increased. This could be explained by the ferrate oxidation of the real matrix
containing PCDD/F, which could help/contribute to the release of PCDD/F bound to the
matrix and thus a higher extraction yield could have been caused. However, the increase in
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Pavel Hrabák, Martina Homolková, Stanisław Wacławek and Miroslav Černík
478
TEQ may also have been caused solely by experiment error, as the difference between the
base and ferrate treated samples is within the range of standard deviation. The relatively
high standard deviation ranges in the case of the ferrate and nZVI treated samples could be
explained by difficult dosing of these two particular chemicals due to their inhomogeneity.
In the case of ferrate, the inhomogeneity lies in the solid sample itself which was dosed;
whereas nZVI was dosed in the form of an aqueous suspension, which is known to solve
the problem of nZVI sedimentation and/or aggregation [26]. Neither nZVI (despite the
highly reactive pyrophoric form used), nor Pd, nor even their combination, caused any
significant degradation. As mentioned above, according to Kim et al [18], the combination
of nZVI and Pd rapidly dechlorinates PCDD. However, in their study bimetallic palladized
nanosized ZVI (Pd/nFe) was used. In contrast, only a simple mixture of nZVI and
nanosized Pd was used in our experiment. This fact may explain our negative result, as such
a contact between the two surfaces was not achieved in our study.
Fig. 3. Summary of the whole study expressed in TEQ values (mean ± standard deviation)
The behavior of the individual congeners in the PSF treated samples and their
contribution to the overall decline in TEQ are shown in Figure 4. The rate of decline
differed for each PCDD/F congener; however, it is apparent that there was a decrease in
each of them. No increase in the concentration of any of the congeners was observed. The
most significant contribution to the overall decrease was exhibited by congeners D1, D2
and D4. When taking into account the relative values, the highest relative decline was
observed for D2, F1 and F2, which decreased by 97.1, 91.4 and 85.3%, respectively;
whereas the lowest observed decline was 28.5, 47.0 and 47.5% for F8, D6 and D7,
respectively. One can conclude that high reactivity of PSF towards PCDD/F congeners can
be due to the high reaction rate between both sulfate and hydroxyl radicals and the electron
rich bonds in aromatic rings [27, 28].
As there was a different rate of decline of each PCDD/F congener after PSF treatment,
their relative contribution to the overall toxicity of the sample changed (Fig. 5) compared to
the base sample (Fig. 2). The highest contribution, more than one half, was still
conclusively caused by D1, but the others did not lag so far behind this time. The highest
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Chemical degradation of PCDD/F in contaminated sediment
479
contributions to the total TEQ of PSF treated samples were 53.8, 9.5 and 9.0% for D1, D4
and D6, respectively.
Fig. 4. Decline of individual congeners in the PSF treated samples (mean ± standard deviation)
Fig. 5. Contribution of individual congeners to the overall toxicity of PSF treated samples
Only a few studies are comparable with our system. Kim et al [29] described
approximately 15% TCDD degradation in a heat-activated persulfate system. In contrast to
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Pavel Hrabák, Martina Homolková, Stanisław Wacławek and Miroslav Černík
480
the real soil matrix that we report here, Kim et al [29] dosed TCDD as being solvent-
dissolved and started the reaction after complete acetone evaporation.
The behavior of individual congeners and their contribution to the overall PCDD/F
TEQ increase in Fe(VI) treated samples is shown in Figure 6. It can be assumed that the
overall behavior was caused mostly by D1 and partly by D4. Other congeners with
increasing concentrations were D3, D5, D7, F2, F6 and F10. On the other hand, there are
also congeners with decreasing concentrations. The highest relative decrease was observed
in the case of F9 and F5 with 23.7 and 20.0%, respectively.
Fig. 6. Behavior of individual congeners in the Fe(VI) treated samples (mean ± standard deviation)
Conclusions
In this paper the potential degradation of PCDD/F bound to a real matrix was studied
by five different oxidants and reductants commonly used for in-situ remediation, ie Fe(VI),
nZVI, Pd, Pd+nZVI and PSF. We conclude that only the treatment by sulfate and hydroxyl
radicals formed in the heat-activated PSF system exhibited a significant decrease in the
PCDD/F concentrations. This decrease was 65% when comparing the total toxicity of the
base and the treated samples. Thus, PSF activated at 50°C may be used for the remediation
of aquifers contaminated by these priority pollutants. Future research should be devoted to
studying wider range of activation temperatures, whereby the lower ones are of much
technological interest. Other PSF activation procedures (electroactivation, alkaline
activation or hydrogen peroxide activation as examples) have also a potential to create
strongly mineralising conditions applicable for PCDD/F degradation.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Chemical degradation of PCDD/F in contaminated sediment
481
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the project OPR&DI of the Centre for Nanomaterials,
Advanced Technologies and Innovation (CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0005), the National Programme
for Sustainability I (LO1201) and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the
Czech Republic through the SGS project 21066/115.
References
[1] Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. http://chm.pops.int.
[2] Van den Berg M, Birnbaum LS, Denison M, De Vito M, Farland W, Feeley M, et al. The 2005 World Health
Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like
compounds. Toxicol Sci. 2006;93(2):223-241. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl055.
[3] International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/ Monographs/vol100F/100F-
22-Index-tables.php.
[4] EPA Method 4435, Method for Toxic Equivalents (TEQS) Determinations for Dioxin-Like Chemical
Activity with the CALUX® Bioassay. http://www.xenco.com/content/pdf/tech/
SW846/SW846-4000series/SW846-4435.pdf.
[5] Kukučka P, Audy O, Kohoutek J, Holt E, Kalábová T, Holoubek I, et al. Source identification, spatio-
temporal distribution and ecological risk of persistent organic pollutants in sediments from the upper Danube
catchment. Chemosphere. 2015;138:777-783. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.001.
[6] Lee WJ, Shih SI, Chang CY, Lai YC, Wang LC, Chang-Chien GP. Thermal treatment of polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans from contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater. 2008;160(1):220-227. DOI:
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.113.
[7] Kasai E, Harjanto S, Terui T, Nakamura T, Waseda Y. Thermal remediation of PCDD/Fs contaminated soil
by zone combustion process. Chemosphere. 2000;41(6):857-864. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00535-4.
[8] Reynier N, Blais JF, Mercier G, Besner S. Decontamination of metals, pentachlorophenol, and polychlorined
dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans polluted soil in alkaline conditions using an amphoteric biosurfactant.
Environ Technol. 35(1-4):177-186. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2013.822005.
[9] Kim Y, Lee D. Solubility enhancement of PCDD/F in the presence of dissolved humic matter. J Hazard
Mater. 2002;91(1):113-127. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00364-8.
[10] Kulkarni PS, Crespo JG, Afonso CAM. Dioxins sources and current remediation technologies - A review.
Environ Int. 2008;34(1):139-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.07.009.
[11] Jiang JQ. Research progress in the use of ferrate(VI) for the environmental remediation. J Hazard Mater.
2007;146(3):617-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.075.
[12] Tiwari D, Lee SM. Ferrate(VI) in the Treatment of Wastewaters: A New Generation Green Chemical.
In: Waste Water - Treatment and Reutilization. InTech; 2011. DOI: 10.5772/15500.
[13] Jiang JQ. Advances in the development and application of ferrate(VI) for water and wastewater treatment.
J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2014;89(2):165-177. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4214.
[14] Tosco T, Petrangeli Papini M, Cruz Viggi C, Sethi R. Nanoscale zerovalent iron particles for groundwater
remediation: a review. J Clean Prod. 2014;77:10-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.026.
[15] Fu F, Dionysiou DD, Liu H. The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater
treatment: A review. J Hazard Mater. 2014;267:194-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.062.
[16] Grittini C, Malcomson M, Fernando Q, Korte N. Rapid dechlorination of polychlorinated biphenyls on the
surface of a Pd/Fe bimetallic system. Environ Sci Technol. 1995;29(11):2898-2900. DOI:
10.1021/es00011a029.
[17] Zhou HY, Xu XH, Wang DH. Catalytic dechlorination of chlorobenzene in water by Pd/Fe bimetallic
system. J Environ Sci (China). 2003;15(5):647-651. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14562926.
[18] Kim JH, Tratnyek PG, Chang YS. Rapid dechlorination of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins by bimetallic
and nanosized zerovalent iron. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(11):4106-4112. DOI: 10.1021/es702560k.
[19] Wang Z, Huang W, Peng P, Fennell DE. Rapid transformation of 1,2,3,4-TCDD by Pd/Fe catalysts.
Chemosphere. 2010;78(2):147-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.09.066.
[20] Tsitonaki A, Petri B, Crimi M, Mosbæk H, Siegrist Rl, Bjerg Pl. In situ chemical oxidation of contaminated
soil and groundwater using persulfate: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2010;40(1):55-91. DOI:
10.1080/10643380802039303.
[21] Certified Reference Material BCT-529. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/rm/BCR-529_cert.pdf.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM
Pavel Hrabák, Martina Homolková, Stanisław Wacławek and Miroslav Černík
482
[22] Antunes P, Viana P, Vinhas T, Capelo JL, Rivera J, Gaspar EMSM. Optimization of pressurized liquid
extraction (PLE) of dioxin-furans and dioxin-like PCBs from environmental samples. Talanta.
2008;75(4):916-925. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.12.042.
[23] Hong B, Garabrant D, Hedgeman E, Demond A, Gillespie B, Chen Q, et al. Impact of WHO 2005 revised
toxic equivalency factors for dioxins on the TEQs in serum, household dust and soil. Chemosphere.
2009;76(6):727-733. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.05.034.
[24] ČSN EN 1948-2 (834745) - Technické normy ČSN - Stanovení hmotnostní koncentrace PCDD/PCDF - Část
2: Extrakce a čištění. (Technical standards CSN - Determination of mass concentration of
PCDD / PCDF - Part 2: Extraction and purification). http://www.technicke-normy-csn.cz/inc/
nahled_normy.php?norma=834745-csn-en-1948-2&kat=77746.
[25] ČSN EN 1948-3 (834745) - Technické normy ČSN - Stanovení hmotnostní koncentrace PCDD/PCDF - Část
3: Identifikace a kvantitativní stanovení. (Technical standards CSN - Determination of mass concentration of
PCDD / PCDF - Part 3: Identification and quantification). http://www.technicke-normy-csn.cz/inc/
nahled_normy.php?norma=834745-csn-en-1948-3&kat=77749.
[26] Theron J, Walker JA, Cloete TE. Nanotechnology and water treatment: applications and emerging
opportunities. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2008;34(1):43-69. DOI: 10.1080/10408410701710442.
[27] Rickman KA, Mezyk SP. Kinetics and mechanisms of sulfate radical oxidation of β-lactam antibiotics in
water. Chemosphere. 2010;81(3):359-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.015.
[28] Wojnárovits L, Takács E. Rate coefficients of hydroxyl radical reactions with pesticide molecules and
related compounds: A review. Radiat Phys Chem. 2014;96:120-134. DOI:
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.09.003.
[29] Kim JH, Lee JM, Lee HS, Kim JH, Lee JW, Chang YS, et al. Degradation of Polychlorinated
Dibenzo-p-Dioxins/Furans Using Heat-Activated Persulfate. Proc Sixth Int Conf Remediation of Chlorinated
and Recalcitrant Compounds. Monterey. CA: 2008. http://www.ebs.ieh.ohsu.edu/tratnyek/resources/
docs/KimChangNurmiTratnyek08-PCDDs.pdf.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 12/19/16 9:28 AM