ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Aim of this study was to evaluate influence of various shading treatments on yield, growth and biochemical composition of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. crispy) in Spring season at soilless culture. Green (35% and 55%) and white (35% and 55%) shading nets were used in the study. Plants were covered with shading materials when they reached to 9-10 true leaves. Unshaded plants were used as control treatment. The experimental design was conducted randomized split-plots with three replications. Marketable head weight, plant growth parameters, such as leaf number, head length and head diameter and biomass, dry matter, nitrate, ascorbic acid, titratable acidity, soluble solid matter (o brix) and pH were evaluated.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Role of Shading on Growth, Yield and
Biochemical Composition of Crisp Lettuce in Soilless
Mine Aydin1*, Necdettin Saglam1, Naif Gebologlu1, Sezer Sahin2,
Emin Yilmaz1, Hakan Yucel1, Mehmet RüşKaraman2
1Gaziosmanpasa Univ., Agricultural Faculty, Dept. Hort., Tokat, Turkey
*E-mail :
2Gaziosmanpasa Univ., Agr. Faculty, Dept. Soil Sci. Plant Nut., Tokat, Turkey
Abstract: Aim of this study was to evaluate influence of various shading
treatments on yield, growth and biochemical composition of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.
var. crispy) in Spring season at soilless culture. Green (35% and 55%) and white (35%
and 55%) shading nets were used in the study. Plants were covered with shading
materials when they reached to 9-10 true leaves. Unshaded plants were used as control
treatment. The experimental design was conducted randomized split-plots with three
replications. Marketable head weight, plant growth parameters, such as leaf number,
head length and head diameter and biomass, dry matter, nitrate, ascorbic acid, titratable
acidity, soluble solid matter (obrix) and pH were evaluated.
Keywords: Crisp lettuce, shading, head weight, biochemical compositions
1. Introduction
Solar radiation is one of the most important factors in greenhouse during late
spring and summer season. It increases plant physiological disorders and decreases
yield and quality (Gent, 2007). High light intensity increases photochemical
damage of leaf and reduces photosynthesis during late spring and summer. Many
methods, such as fogging systems and cooling pads have been used to prevent
effects of excess solar radiation in greenhouse. In addition, use of nets for shading
is one of applications to decrease negative effects of solar radiation in greenhouse
and field conditions (Sandri et al., 2003). Different shading methods, such as
whitewashing, shading nets and curtains have been used for shading in agriculture
(Lorenzo et al., 2004; Fernandez-Rodrigez et al., 2000; Kittas et al., 2001). Lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa) is one of the most cultivated vegetable crops both
greenhouse and open field. It is usually consumed raw and without any restriction
for daily consuming. Lettuce contains high level of ascorbic acid (Rattler et al.,
2005) and nitrate (Burns et al., 2011). It also contains low level or moderate level
of soluble solid dry matter (obrix) and titratable acidity. The objective of this study
was to evaluate the agronomic and biochemical characteristics of lettuce grown
under different shading nets in soilless culture.
2. Materials and Methods
Determination of Temperature, Solar Radiation and Relative Humidity:
Temperature, solar radiation level and humidity of shaded and unshaded
atmosphere were measured before 20 days until harvest in the experiment.
Temperature (oC), solar radiation (lux) and relative humidity (%) measurements
were observed two times a day (11 am and 3 pm).
Plant Material and Growing System: The experiment was conducted out in
unheated greenhouse conditions in Tokat (39º 52’- 40º 55’ North latitude and 35º
27’- 37º 39’ east longitude), Turkey. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.var. crispa) var.
‘Funly’ was used in the experiment. Cocopeat was used for growing medium in
Spring season (April-May), 2013. Macro and micro nutrients were added at
Hoagland solution (Arnon and Hoagland, 1940). White (35% and 55%) and green
(35% and 55%) shading nets were used in the study. Shading nets was installed on
plants as low tunnel in greenhouse and they were used when plants reached 9-10
true leaves. Unshaded plants were used as control treatment. Ten plants were
cultivated in each plot. Plants were harvested after 55 days from planting. Plant
diameter, leaf number, biomass, marketable head weight and dry weight were
measured as quantitative criteria. Dry weight was measured after leaves dried at 70
ºC for 48 hours.
Biochemical Analyses: Nitrate was measured with a Shimadzu UV mini
1240 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), using the salicylic-sulfuric acid
method (Cataldo et al., 1975). Each sample (200 mg of fresh matter) was extracted
with 10 ml hot water (at 90-950C) and shaken form in, then centrifuged at 5000
rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was recovered and 200µl were added to 800µl of
5% salicylic-sulfuric acid, then 19 ml of sodium hydroxide (2N NaOH) were
slowly added. The spectrophotometer readings were taken at 410 nm. Data
compared with a standard nitrate reference. The ascorbic acid concentration was
measured with a Shimadzu UV mini 1240 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo,
Japan) using titrimetric method modified from Huang and Liu (2001).
Metaphosphoric acid solution (6%) was used for extraction of the ascorbic acid.
After that extraction was filtrated with Whatman No 1.Filtrated solution was
recovered and 200 µl were added to 800 µl of 6% metaphosphoric acid solution,
then 4 ml 2,6 dichlophenolindophenol sodium were added. The spectrophotometer
readings were taken at 520 nm. Data compared with a standard ascorbic acid
reference. The soluble solid dry matter was measured by digital refractometer. The
titratable acidity expressed relative to citric acid was determined by recommended
procedures. The samples were diluted with deionized water and titrated with
aqueous NaOH 0,1 N using ethanol phenolphthalein (1%) as indicator. The pH
measurements were carried out on a model Hanna HI 2211 pH meter. The
experimental design was randomized split plots with three replications. Data were
analyzed to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The means were evaluated by
Duncan's multiple range test, P 0.05.
3. Results and Discussion
Temperature, Solar Radiation and Relative Humidity: The highest daily
average temperature was determined under white 55% shading net, and it was
followed by white 35%, unshaded, green 55% and green 35%, respectively. The
highest daily average relative humidity was observed under white 35% shading net,
and it was followed by white 55%, green 35%, unshaded and green 55%,
respectively. Daily average temperature and relative humidity observations were
given in Fig1. Daily mean light intensity (solar radiation) was determined between
5110-13500 lux in unshaded treatment, 3780-8800 lux in white 35% shading net,
3135-7000 lux in green 35% shading net, 2960-6900 lux in white 55% shading net
and 1700-4250 lux in green 55% shading net. Daily average solar radiation was
given in Fig 2.
Fig 1. Daily changes of temperature (a) and relative humidity (b) under the
shaded and unshaded treatments
Interaction between shading application and quantitative characteristics:
There were significant interactions between shading treatments and quantitative
characteristics in lettuce. Biomass was determined between 654.43-976.92 g
according to shading applications. Biomass was higher under white shading net
than green. Marketable head weight was found out between 496.22-801.62 g
according to shading applications. Control was not affected significantly by 35%
white and green shading nets. The highest leaf number was determined in control
plants. Leaf number was decreased when shading rate increased. Differences
between control plants and 35% white and green shading nets were no significant.
Head diameter was found out between 33.00-38.17 cm. The highest head diameter
was measured on plants, cultivated under white 55% shading nets. There were no a
linear interaction between head diameter and shading materials. In the study, dry
weight was determined between 4.28-5.37 %. The highest dry weight was found
out in control plants. Dry weight was decreased when shading rate increased.
Those observations were given in the Table 1.
Fig 2. Daily changes of solar radiation under the shaded and unshaded treatments
All the yield parameters were significantly affected by shading net rate and
color. Unshaded plants were stronger than shaded plants. Marroua et al., (2013)
indicated that the number of leaves and fresh weight of lettuce plants were greater
under full sunlight cultivation compared with shaded plants. Similarly, Thicoipe
(1997), found that fresh weight of lettuce grown under low solar radiation during
winter was lower than plants grown under high solar radiation during summer. In
another study, Zhou et al., (2009), found that dry weight was decreased from
5.99% (high light) to 0.97% (low light). Similar results represented by Sanchez et
al., (1989). In the another study similar results with lettuce dry matter yield of
10.14, 7.69 and 3.29 g/plant were observed in an experiment with shading at 0,
18% and 50% respectively. There was also a reduction in biomass production of
lettuce when shading rate increased from 10 to 90%, falling from 225.7 to 81.0
g/plant (Bryne et al., 2002). Our results are in agreement with the literature.
Interaction between shading application and qualitative characteristics:
There are important interactions between levels of shading and nitrate content.
Nitrate content was changed between 1714.52 (unshaded control plants)
and 2290.72 (shaded with green 55% nets). Nitrate content was increased
with increasing shading rate. Nitrate contents were no determined over level of
2500 mg (European Union limit for lettuce) of fresh weight in all
treatments. Leafy vegetable crops, such as lettuce and spinach, are known to
accumulate high level of nitrate. Furthermore, shading causes higher nitrate
accumulation when it is compared with full light conditions. Low light intensity
encourages nitrate accumulation due to absorption rate of nitrate (Bloom-Zandstra
et al., 1988). Light intensity is the most important environmental factor for nitrate
accumulation in plants because plants usually accumulate more nitrates when they
are subjected to low light intensity (Ohse, 2000). This explains why nitrate level is
higher in our experiment. Cometti et al., (2011), showed that nitrate accumulation
is highly related to shading. Results are similar to them.
Table 1. Effect of shading treatments on quantitative traits.
Leaf nu.
Dry w.
948.24 ab**
39.30 ab*
37.97 a*
4.76 b**
811.62 b
34.33 b
38.17 a
4.28 c
911.14 ab
37.83 ab
33.93 ab
4.59 bc
654.43 c
33.17 b
33.00 b
4.46 bc
976.92 a
42.50 a
37.17 ab
5.37 a
(*) and (**) refers to significant at P0.05 and P0.01. Values marked in columns with the
same letter do not differ significantly for 5% level.
Table 2. Effect of shading treatments on qualitative traits.
rate (%)
Ascorbic acid
(mg.100 g-1)
1912.15 b**
134.76 bc**
3.53 a*
0.24 a*
2228.81 a
125.53 cd
1.40 ha
0.18 bc
2183.57 a
145.38 ab
3.43 a
0.21 ab
2290.72 a
119.88 d
3.17 a
0.18 bc
1714.52 b
151.13 a
2.43 b
0.16 c
(*) , (**) and (ns) refers to significant at P0.05 and P0.01 and insignificant, respectively.
Values marked in columns with the same letter do not differ significantly for 5% level.
When shading rate increased, ascorbic acid level was decreased. It is known
that light conditions affect ascorbic acid level of fruit and vegetables. Lower light
intensity generally decreases ascorbic acid concentration (Mozafar, 1994). The
highest ascorbic acid was obtained from higher light intensities. Similar results
were obtained by Ohashi-Kaneko et al., (2007) and Li and Kubota (2009) in
spinach and lettuce. Soluble solid dry matter (obrix) is an important quality criteria
in vegetables and fruits. Soluble solid dry matter content was affected significantly
from shading treatments. Titratable acidity was increased by shading nets, but there
was no linear relationship. It was affected significantly. There was no significant
difference between treatments for pH values..
Arnon, D. I., Hoagland, D.R. 1940 . Crop production in artificial culture solutions and
in soils with special reference to factors influencing yields and absorption of
inorganic nutrients . Soil Science 50:463-485.
Bloom-Zandstra, G., Lampe, J.E.M. and Ammerlaan, F.H.M. 1988. C and N utilization
of two lettuce geotypes during growth under non-varying light conditions and
after changing the light intensity. Physiologia Plant. 74:147-153.
Burns, G.I., Zhang, K., Turner, M.K., Meacham, M., Al-Redhiman, K., Lynn, J.,
Broadley, M.R., Hand, P. and Pink, D. 2011. Screening for genotype and
environment effects on nitrate accumulation in 24 species of young lettuce.
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 91(3):553-562.
Byrne, C., Maher, M.J., Hennerty, M.J., Mahon, M.J., Walshe, P.A. 2002. Reducing
the nitrate content of protected lettuce. Irish agriculture and food development
authority. Dublin: university college, 19 pp.
Cataldo, D.A., Haroon, M., Sehrader, L.E. and Youngs, V.L. 1975. Rapid colorimetric
determination of nitrate in plant tissue by titration of salicylic acid.
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 6:71-80.
Cometti, N.N., Martins, M.Q., Aparecida, C., Nunes, J.A. 2011. Nitrate concentration
in lettuce leaves depending on photosynthetic photon flux and nitrate
concentration in the nutrient solution. Hortic. Bras. 29(4).
Fernandez-Rodriguez, E.J., Fernandez Vadillos, J., Camacho Ferre, F., Vazquez, J.J.,
Kenig, A. 2000. Radiative field uniformity under shading screens under
greenhouse vs whitewash in Spain. Acta Hort. 534:125-130.
Gent, M.P.N. 2007. Effect of Degree and Duration of Shade on Quality of Greenhouse
Tomato. HortScience 42(3):514-520.
Huang, X.Y. and Liu, L.W. 2001. Integrative Experiment of Food Chemistry, Beijing, ,
China: China Agriculture University Press.
Kittas, C., Katsoulas, N., Baille, A. 2001. Influence of greenhouse ventilation regime
on the microclimate and energy partitioning of a rose canopy during summer
conditions. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 79:349-360.
Li, Q., Kubota, C. 2009. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and
phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environmental and Exp. Botany, 67:59-64.
Lorenzo, P., Sanchez-Guerrero, M.C., Medrano, E., García, M.L., Caparros, I., Coelho,
G., Gimenez, M. 2004. Climate control in the summer season: A comparative
study of external mobile shading and fog system. Acta Hort. 659:189-194.
Marroua,H., Werya, J., Dufoura, L., Dupraza, C. 2013. Productivity and radiation use
efficiency of lettuces grown in the partial shade of photovoltaic panels. Europ. J.
Agr. 44:54-66.
Mozafar, A. 1994. Plant Vitamins: agronomic, physiological and nutritional aspects;
CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
Ohashi-Kaneko, K., Takase, M., Kon, N., Fujiwara, K., Kurata, K. 2007. Effect of light
quality on growth and vegetable quality in leaf lettuce, spinach and komatsuna.
Environ. Control Biol. 45:189-198.
Ohse, S. 2000. Qualidade nutricional e acúmulo de nitrato em alface hidropônica. In:
santos o (ed). Hidroponia da alface. Santa maria: ımpr. Univ. Ufsm. pp. 10-24.
Rattler, S., Briviba, K., Birzele, B. and Koepke, U. 2005. Effect of agronomic
management practices on lettuce quality. International Scientific Conference on
Organic Agriculture, September 21-23, Adelaide, Australia.
Sanchez, C.A., Allen, R.J., Schaffer, B. 1989. Growth and yield of crisphead lettuce
under various shade conditions. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(6):884-890.
Sandri, M.A., Andriolo, J.L., Witter, M., Dal Ross, T. 2003. Effect Of Shading On
Tomato Plants Grow Under Greenhouse. Hort. Brasileira, 21(4):642-645.
Thicoipe, J.P. 1997. Laitues. CTIFL SERAIL, Paris. pp. 280.
Zhou, Y.H., Zhang Y.Y., Zhao, X., Yu, H.J., Shi, K., J.Q. 2009. Impact of Light
Variation on Development of Photoprotection, Antioxidants, and Nutritional
Value in Lactuca sativa L.J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (12):5494-5500.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
Some amount of shade may be optimal to produce high-quality tomatoes in a greenhouse during summer months in the northeast United States. Simultaneous comparisons were made among greenhouse sections that were either not shaded or covered with reflective aluminized shadecloth that attenuated 15%, 30%, or 50% of direct sunlight. The shadecloth was applied at the start of warm weather in June. The houses were shaded for the rest of the summer, and fruit was picked until late August. Total yield decreased linearly with increasing shade, but there was no significant difference among shade treatments in marketable yield. The fraction of fruit that was marketable was greatest for plants grown under 50% shade. This fraction was 9% greater than in a greenhouse with no shade in 2003 and 7% greater in 2004 and 2005. Cracked skin was the defect most affected by shade. Among sensitive cultivars, up to 35% of the fruit produced in greenhouses with no shade had cracked skin, whereas in greenhouses covered with 50% shade, only 24% to 26% of the tomatoes had cracked skin. There was no consistent trend for shade density in the fraction of fruit with green shoulder, blossom end rot, or irregular shape. The effect of shade increased with duration of shading. There was no effect of 50% shade compared with no shade on total yield within 20 days, but yield decreased by 20% in the interval from 25 to 45 days after shading and by 30% after 50 or more days of shading in 2005. Marketable yield only decreased after more than 45 days of shading for cultivars that were not sensitive to cracked skin or uneven ripening. Shade decreased fruit size over the entire season only in 2003. In general, shading increased the fraction of marketable tomato fruit without affecting fruit size.
Full-text available
Studies were conducted during five winter cropping periods in the Everglades, near Belle Glade, Fla., to determine effects of shade applied at various times throughout the growing period on the growth and yield of lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.). Ancillary studies also were conducted in a greenhouse to determine effects of shade on the light response of lettuce with respect to net CO 2 assimilation. The maximum net CO 2 assimilation rate (Pn) for lettuce decreased as the irradiance at which the plants were grown decreased. Continuous shading from thinning to harvest reduced crop growth approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in irradiance. Lettuce was most sensitive to reductions in radiation when growth and development were most rapid. These data suggest that lettuce growth from planting through the eight-leaf stage is not affected by small reductions in radiation that might occur in nature, but appears to be largely influenced by temperature. This observation is consistent with data collected during greenhouse experiments that showed that Pn at this early growth stage was low regardless of the shade treatment. Lettuce growth from the eight-leaf through the preheading stage was reduced by low shade levels (75% of prevailing solar radiation). Lettuce yield, however, generally was not affected by low shade levels through the preheading stage. Shading, regardless of the degree, reduced growth and yield during the heading stage of development. Results from greenhouse experiments indicated that the light saturation point of lettuce for photosynthesis during this latter growth stage could reach 800 μmol·s ⁻¹ ·m ⁻² . This light level is higher than prevailing light that often exists during fall and winter growing seasons in southern Florida.
Full-text available
The nitrate accumulation in plant tissues can occur due to low light availability. However, published studies have not linked nitrate accumulation to photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) measured during the growing period. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the reduction of photosynthetic photon flux and the concentration of nitrate in the nutrient solution on agronomic characteristics and accumulation of nitrate in lettuce grown in hydroponics. The trial design was entirely randomized in a factorial scheme (4 x 2) with three repetitions, and four shading levels: 0, 30, 50, and 80% and two nitrate levels in nutrient solution: 5 and 10 mmol L-1. The dry matter production decreased directly and linearly with the reduction of light. The lowest level in nitrate solution also led to reduction in dry mass yield. The maximum accumulation of nitrate reached 966.3 mg kg-1 fresh mass, with PPF of 118 μmol/m2/s and 140 mg L-1 of N-NO3-1 (below the maximum levels recommended by the European Union), and the minimum of 200 mg kg-1 with PPF of 455 μmol/m2/s and 70 mg L-1 of N-NO3-1 in the nutrient solution. The reduction of nitrate in the nutrient solution from 140 to 70 mg L-1 led to the reduction of nitrate accumulation in shoots, but also caused a decrease in the production of phytomass of shoots, as well as reduced leaf area significantly.
Full-text available
The influence of the greenhouse ventilation regime (natural or forced ventilation) on the energy partitioning of a well-watered rose canopy (Rosa hybrida, cv. First Red) was investigated during several summer days in warm mediterranean conditions (Volos, Eastern Greece). Two types of ventilation systems were evaluated: (i) fans and roof openings (forced ventilation) and (ii) roof openings only (natural ventilation). The relevant climatic variables (air temperature and vapour pressure deficit), average canopy temperature, transpiration rate and intercepted net radiation were continuously monitored. The data were processed in order to derive the canopy-to-air sensible heat flux, the bulk aerodynamic and stomatal conductance of the canopy, and the Bowen ratio. The results indicated that forced ventilation induced a more homogeneous vertical field for temperature and humidity, by providing a more intensive mixing of the inside atmosphere. It was found that the canopy-to-air sensible heat flux and the transpiration rate were not significantly enhanced under fan-assisted ventilation and that the Bowen ratio was similar under both regimes, ranging from −0·5 to −1·0. The canopy-to-air temperature difference was significantly different, being less negative under forced ventilation. Calculated values of the crop water stress index were similar and relatively high (≈0·5) for both regimes. The values of the bulk aerodynamic conductance were found to be dependent on the ventilation regime, those for forced ventilation being roughly double than those for natural ventilation. The estimated values of the stomatal conductance of the canopy were slightly higher (about 10–15%) under natural ventilation. Normalizing the stomatal conductance of the canopy by radiation revealed a strong stomatal response to the humidity conditions prevailing at the surface of the canopy. It appeared that forced ventilation increased significantly the aerodynamic conductance, but did not influence significantly water consumption when compared to natural ventilation, because of the negative feedback between canopy-to-air vapour pressure deficit and stomatal conductance.
Conference Paper
Climate control in protected crops has been considered as a strategy to mitigate the harmful effect of the use of irrigation water of moderate salinity. This study conducted a comparative evaluation of the effect of two climate control systems, external mobile shading and fog, on the greenhouse climate and yield of a tomato crop grown on perlite substrate irrigated with two nutrient solutions of different salinity: LEC 3 dS m-1 and HEC 5 dS m-1. The adopted set points to manage the mobile shading system resulted in a 20% reduction of the incident radiation on the canopy. Marketable yield of the LEC treatments was statistically similar in both systems, 15.2 kg m-2 and 15.4 kg m-2 for mobile shading and fog respectively, while under HEC and shading conditions yield was 11.6 kg m-2, higher than the 8.1 kg m-2 obtained with the fog system. This is due to a reduction of the BER (Blossom End Rot) incidence in the shaded treatment. The mobile shading increased water use efficiency (WUE) in both treatments by reducing the crop transpiration rate, especially in the high salinity treatment associated also to higher commercial yield.
The effects of light quality on biomass and internal quality of leaf lettuce, spinach and komatsuna were examined. The plants were grown hydroponically in an environmentally controlled room with a 12-h light period and under a light/dark temperature of 20 ± 1°C/18 ± 1°C and a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 300 μmol m-2 s-1 under four light quality treatments, i.e., red light from red fluorescent lamps (R) or blue light from blue fluorescent lamps (B) or a mixture of R and B (RB) or white light from white fluorescent lamps (W). The irradiation of R compared with W increased shoot dry weight in komatsuna and decreased the nitrate content in spinach. Irradiation of B or RB compared with W increased the L-ascorbic acid content in leaf lettuce and komatsuna and decreased the nitrate content in leaf lettuce. Irradiation of B was not suitable for the spinach cultivation due to an extremely decreased shoot dry weight although the carotenoid content was slightly increased. Our data show that controlling light quality is useful to achieve higher productivity or higher nutritional quality of the commercial crops even under limited light intensity in controlled-environment agricultural facilities although the effective light quality treatment differs depending on the plant species.