Content uploaded by Forti Louis Nuvagah
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Forti Louis Nuvagah on Feb 18, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
C
URRENT
O
PINION
The effects of exercise on muscle strength, body
composition, physical functioning and the
inflammatory profile of older adults: a
systematic review
Keliane Liberman
a,b
, Louis N. Forti
a,b
, Ingo Beyer
a,b,c
, and Ivan Bautmans
a,b,c
Purpose of review
This systematic review reports the most recent literature regarding the effects of physical exercise on muscle
strength, body composition, physical functioning and inflammation in older adults. All articles were
assessed for methodological quality and where possible effect size was calculated.
Recent findings
Thirty-four articles were included – four involving frail, 24 healthy and five older adults with a specific
disease. One reported on both frail and nonfrail patients. Several types of exercise were used: resistance
training, aerobic training, combined resistance training and aerobic training and others. In frail older
persons, moderate-to-large beneficial exercise effects were noted on inflammation, muscle strength and
physical functioning. In healthy older persons, effects of resistance training (most frequently investigated) on
inflammation or muscle strength can be influenced by the exercise modalities (intensity and rest interval
between sets). Muscle strength seemed the most frequently used outcome measure, with moderate-to-large
effects obtained regardless the exercise intervention studied. Similar effects were found in patients with
specific diseases.
Summary
Exercise has moderate-to-large effects on muscle strength, body composition, physical functioning and
inflammation in older adults. Future studies should focus on the influence of specific exercise modalities and
target the frail population more.
Keywords
elderly, exercise, inflammation, sarcopenia, skeletal muscle
INTRODUCTION
Reduced muscle mass (sarcopenia), muscle perform-
ance and strength (dynapenia) and increased CLIP
are typical characteristics of aging. Older adults with
higher CLIP show increased sarcopenia and dyna-
penia [1]. Physical exercise can reduce CLIP, sarco-
penia and dynapenia in older adults [2–4]. Aging is
also accompanied by lower physical function and
activity as well as other changes in body compo-
sition such as osteoporosis and increased fat mass
[5]. Exercise can slow down these processes and even
reverse them [6]. In fact, exercise is one of the most
effective means to attenuate characteristics of aging
and many chronic diseases [7,8].
In older adults, 30 min of aerobic training such
as walking, running or cycling three times per
week has significant effects on cardiorespiratory
endurance after 4–5 months. Also body weight
and BFM can significantly be reduced after aerobic
training in older adults [9]. Resistance training has
shown to increase muscle mass and muscle strength
already after 2–3 months [10]. Another study
showed that resistance training at higher intensity
or combined medium intensity improved muscle
a
Frailty in Ageing Research Unit,
b
Gerontology Department, Vrije Uni-
versiteit Brussel and
c
Geriatrics Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis
Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Correspondence to Ivan Bautmans, PhD, Gerontology Department, Vrije
Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels,
Belgium. Tel: +32 2 477 42 07; e-mail: ivan.bautmans@vub.be
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2017, 20:30–53
DOI:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000335
www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
REVIEW
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
strength more than resistance training at a low
intensity [11].
The aim of this review is to provide an overview
of the most recent literature regarding the effects of
physical exercise on muscle strength, body compo-
sition, physical functioning and the inflammatory
profile in older adults.
METHODS
PubMed [search key: (Frail OR ‘Frail Elderly’[Mesh]
OR ‘Aged’[Mesh]) AND (’Exercise’[Mesh] OR ‘Exer-
cise Movement Techniques’[Mesh] OR ‘Exercise
Therapy’[Mesh] OR ‘Resistance Training’[Mesh]
OR exercise) AND (Sarcopenia OR ‘Muscle Fibers,
Skeletal’[Mesh] OR ‘Myoblasts, Skeletal’[Mesh] OR
‘Muscle, Skeletal’[Mesh] OR ‘Inflammation’[Mesh]
OR ‘Cytokines’[Mesh] OR ‘Chemokines’[Mesh])]
and Web of Science [search key: (TS ¼(Frail OR Frail
Elderly OR Aged) AND TS ¼(Exercise OR Exercise
Movement Techniques OR Exercise Therapy OR
Resistance Training OR exercise) AND TS ¼(Sarco-
(Sarcopenia OR Muscle Fibers, Skeletal OR Myo-
blasts, Skeletal OR Muscle, Skeletal OR
Inflammation OR Cytokines OR Chemokines)]
were screened for articles published in 2015 or
2016 (last search on 26 May 2016). Filters were used
in PubMed, including studies when written in Eng-
lish, designed as randomized controlled trials or
controlled clinical trials (reviews were excluded)
and included human patients aged at least 65 years.
This resulted in 108 and 26 articles, respectively.
Only studies with an exercise intervention in older
adults, with an outcome focused on inflammation,
muscle strength, body composition or physical
functioning were included; studies focusing on
the effects of nutritional supplementation or with-
out control group for exercise intervention were not
eligible. A total of 90 articles were excluded after
screening the titles and abstracts for the following
reasons: published before 2015, did not study older
adults, did not use an exercise intervention,
measured other outcome parameters or for other
reasons (e.g. study performed on animals). After
reading full texts, 18 articles were excluded on
the basis of study design (not RCTs), outcome
parameters or lack of exercise intervention. By
screening the reference lists and citations of the
included articles, nine more relevant articles
were identified and included in the review.
This finally resulted in 34 included articles
[12
&
,13,14
&&
,15,16,17
&&
,18
&
,19,20
&
,21
&
,22
&&
–25
&&
,
26,27
&&
,28–30,31
&
,32
&&
,33,34
&&
,35–38,39
&
–41
&
,42,
43
&&
–45
&&
]. An overview of the literature search can
befoundinFig.1.
Quality assessment
Articles were assessed by two reviewers (K.L. and I.B.,
Table 1) using the NICE guidelines for randomized
controlled trials [46].
Data extraction
For all articles, main characteristics of the partici-
pants and interventions were identified. Next, all
outcome parameters regarding the inflammatory
profile, body composition, muscle strength and
physical functioning were extracted. Data regarding
these outcome parameters were identified, and
effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d (small
effect size d¼0.2, medium effect size d¼0.5 and
large effect size d¼0.8) [47]. When insufficient data
were available in the article, the authors were con-
tacted by e-mail to obtain supplementary data
allowing us to calculate effect size. If authors did
not respond, effect size was reported as ‘no data
available’ (n.d.a.). Effects of other interventions
(e.g. nutritional supplementation) were ignored in
the data extraction and analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Thirty-four articles were included – four involving
frail older adults (Table 2), 24 healthy, nonfrail older
adults (Table 3) and five older adults with a specific
disease (Table 4). One article reported on both frail
and nonfrail patients.
KEY POINTS
Thirty-four relevant articles were included: a
methodological quality assessment was performed and
effect size for outcome parameters was calculated
where possible.
Few articles involving limited types of interventions in
frail older adults showed improvements on muscle
strength, physical functioning and CLIP.
In healthy nonfrail older adults, resistance training is
mostly used and showed improved CLIP, physical
functioning, body composition and muscle strength.
Articles involving older adults with a specific disease
showed that exercise interventions are feasible and
showed overall positive effects in all outcome
parameters, although reducing CLIP can be more
challenging depending on the condition.
Frail older patients are scarcely involved in exercise
interventions, and more studies should focus on
comparing the effects of different types of exercise
interventions in this population.
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 31
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exercise interventions
Several types of exercises were identified in the 36
included studies. These can be divided into four
categories. The first category, encompassing 16 stud-
ies, concerns resistance training ranging from mod-
erate (50– 60% 1RM) to high(70– 80% 1RM) intensity
[12
&
,14
&&
,17
&&
,18
&
,20
&
,21
&
,23
&&
,29,30,32
&&
,34
&&
,36,
39
&
,41
&
,43
&&
,44
&&
]. Second, eight studies used aerobic
training, including mainly cycling and walking
[15,17
&&
,23
&&
,25
&&
,27
&&
,31
&
,35,45
&&
]. Third, six studies
investigated the effects of combined training
(combined resistance training and aerobic training)
[23
&&
–25
&&
,26,27
&&
,35]. Lastly, the remaining
studies included other types of exercises including
whole body vibration (WBV) (n¼5) [19,33,37,38,42],
exercise with horses (in which participants per-
formed exercises on the floor interacting with the
horse as well as exercises on the horse, n¼1) [13],
Pilates and Huber training (n¼1) [28], (weighted) tai
chi (n¼2) [16,40
&
], soccer training [12
&
] and balance
training [14
&&
].
Exercise effects in frail older adults
Five studies were identified, of which one reported
on the effects of exercise on inflammation [24
&&
],
four on body composition [24
&&
,34
&&
,41
&
,45
&&
] and
four on physical functioning and muscle strength
[19,24
&&
,34
&&
,41
&
]. Frail elderly often present elev-
ated CLIP [48], and physical frailty also implies –
IdenticationScreeningEligibilityIncluded
Records identied through
database searching
(n = 108)
Additional records identied
through other sources
(n = 36)
Records after duplicates removed
(n = 142)
Records screened
(n = 142)
Records excluded
(n = 90)
Full-text articles excluded,
with reasons
(n = 18)
Full-text articles assessed
for eligibility
(n = 52)
Studies included in
qualitative synthesis
(n = 34)
Studies included in
quantitative synthesis
(meta-analysis)
(n = 34)
FIGURE 1. Overview of the literature search.
Ageing: biology and nutrition
32 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 1. Quality assessment of the included articles
(A) Selection bias
(systematic differ-
ences between the
comparison groups)
(B) Performance bias
(systematic differences
between groups in the
care provided, apart
from the intervention
under investigation)
(C) Attrition bias (systematic differences between the comparison
groups with respect to loss of participants)
(D) Detection bias (bias in how
outcomes are ascertained,
diagnosed or verified)
References A1 A2 A3 Risk B1 B2 B3 Risk C1 C2a C2b C3a C3b Risk D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Risk
Andersen et al. [12
&
] UUYUYNUUYST:n¼1; RT: n¼0;
Co: n¼0
U ST: n¼1; RT: n¼0;
Co: n¼0
ULYYYYUL
Aranda-Garci
´aet al.
[13]
Y U N U Y N N U Y TE: n¼1; HE: n¼7;
Co: n¼5
U TE: n¼2; HE: n¼10;
Co: n¼5
UUYYYYUL
Beurskens et al. [14
&&
]UUYUYNUUYHRT:n¼0; BAL: n¼0;
CO: n¼0
N/A HRT: n¼0; BAL: n¼0;
CO: n¼0
N/A L Y Y Y U U L
Camillo et al. [15] U U N/A L N/A N/A N/A U N/A n¼0N/An¼0 N/A U N/A Y Y N/A U L
Campo et al. [16] U U Y U Y N N U Y TCC: n¼3; HEC: n¼6 Y TCC: n¼1; HEC: n¼1Y L Y YYUUU
Canuto Wanderley
et al. [17
&&
]
YY N U Y N N U YAT:n¼4; RT: n¼8;
WL: n¼12
U AT: n¼3; RT: n¼8;
WL: n¼0
ULYYYNUU
Carneiro et al. [18
&
] UUYUYNNUYG2:n¼4; G3:
n¼7
UG2:n¼4; G3:
n¼7
ULYYYUUU
Corrie et al. [19] Y Y N U Y Y N L Y SV: n¼2; VV: n¼2;
Sham: n¼2
Y/ U L Y YY Y U L
Dias et al. [20
&
] YUUUYUUUYETG:n¼4; CTG: n¼3 U ETG: n¼4; CTG: n¼3U U Y YYUUU
Emerson et al. [21
&
]UUNHYNUUYn¼0 Y / N/A L Y Y Y N U U
Forti et al. [22
&&
] Y Y Y L Y Y N L Y HIGH: n¼0; LOWþ:
n¼0; LOW: n¼0
N/A HIGH: n¼1; LOWþ:
n¼1; LOW: n¼3
YLYYYYYL
Irving et al. [23
&&
] U U Y U N/A N N H Y CT: n¼1Yn¼0YLYYYUUU
Kim et al. [24
&&
] YYYLYYYLYn¼0Yn¼0YLYYYYYL
Lee et al. [25
&&
] UUUUYUUUYCT:n¼5; AT: n¼3 U CT: n¼5; AT: n¼3UUYYYUUU
Libardi et al. [26] Y U Y L Y U U U Y / N/A / N/A L Y Y Y U U U
Lima et al. [27
&&
] UUNUYUUUYn¼0N/An¼0 N/A L Y Y Y U U U
Markovic et al. [28] Y Y Y L Y N U U Y Huber: n¼1; Pilates:
n¼3
U Huber: n¼1; Pilates:
n¼3
UUYYYYYL
Martins et al. [29] Y Y Y L Y N N U Y TG: n¼5; CG: n¼2 U TG: n¼5; CG: n¼2UUYYYUUU
Nicholson et al. [30] Y U N U Y N Y L Y RT: n¼4; CON: n¼3 U RT: n¼0; CON: n¼0U L YYYYUL
Nishida et al. [31
&
] UUNUYUNUYEG:n¼3; CG: n¼4 U EG: n¼3; CG: n¼4UUYYYUUU
Padilha et al. [32
&&
] UUYUYNNUYG2:n¼0; G3:
n¼0
N/A G2:n¼0; G3:
n¼0
N/A L Y Y Y U U U
Perchthaler et al. [33] U U U U Y U U U Y WBV: n¼1; Co: n¼5UWBV:n¼1; Co: n¼5UU YYYUUU
Reid et al. [34
&&
] UUYUUNNUYLO:n¼1; HI: n¼3 U LO: n¼1; HI: n¼3UUYYYYYL
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 33
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 1 (Continued )
(A) Selection bias
(systematic differ-
ences between the
comparison groups)
(B) Performance bias
(systematic differences
between groups in the
care provided, apart
from the intervention
under investigation)
(C) Attrition bias (systematic differences between the comparison
groups with respect to loss of participants)
(D) Detection bias (bias in how
outcomes are ascertained,
diagnosed or verified)
References A1 A2 A3 Risk B1 B2 B3 Risk C1 C2a C2b C3a C3b Risk D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Risk
Rossi et al. [35] U U Y U Y N U L Y CT: n¼3; AT: n¼20;
CON: n¼16
U CT: n¼3; AT: n¼20;
CON: n¼16
UUYYYUUL
Ruiz et al. [36] Y Y Y L Y N N U Y IG: n¼0; CG: n¼0 N/A IG: n¼0; CG: n¼0 N/A L Y Y Y Y Y L
Salhi et al. [37] Y Y N U N N N H Y WBV: n¼: 5 RT: n¼6 U WBV: n¼: 5 RT: n¼6U L YYYUUL
Sitja
`-Rabert et al. [38] Y Y Y L Y N U L Y WBV: n¼14; RT:
n¼14
U WBV: n¼7; RT: n¼6YLYYYYUL
Strandberg et al. [39
&
] Y U Y L Y N U U Y CON: n¼3; RT: n¼4 U CON: n¼3; RT: n¼4UUYYYUUL
Su et al. [40
&
]UUNUYUUUYUUUUUYYUUUU
Tieland et al. [41
&
] U U Y U Y N N U Y Ex: n¼11; Co: n¼8 U Ex: n¼16; Co: n¼17 U U Y Y Y U U L
Tseng et al. [42] Y Y N U Y N U L Y WBV: n¼0; VFDWBV:
n¼0; CON: n¼0
Y WBV: n¼0; VFDWBV:
n¼0; CON: n¼0
YLYYYUUL
Villanueva et al. [43
&&
] U U U U Y N N U Y SS: n¼0; SL: n¼0 N/A SS: n¼0; SL: n¼0 N/A L Y Y Y N N L
Winters-Stone et al.
[44
&&
]
Y U Y L U N N U Y POWIR: n¼2; FLEX:
n¼3
N POWIR: n¼5 FLEX:
n¼10
N U YYYYYL
Yamada et al. [45
&&
]YUULYNUUYW:n¼1; Co: n¼2UW:n¼1; Co: n¼2ULYYYUUL
A1: adequate method of randomization; A2: adequate concealment of allocation; A3: groups comparable at baseline; B1: groups received same care apart from intervention; B2: participants kept blind; B3: individuals
administering care kept blind; C1: groups followed up equal length of time; C2a participants did not complete treatment; C2b: groups comparable for treatment completion; C3a: participants with missing data; C3b:
groups comparable for availability in outcome data; D1: appropriate length of follow-up; D2: precise definition of outcome; D3: valid method to determine outcome; D4: investigators blinded to participants’ exposure;
D5: investigators blind to other important confounding factors. AT, aerobic training; BAL, balance training; CG, control group; CON, control; CT, combined training; CTG, conventional training group; ETG, eccentric-
focused training group; H, high risk; HE, horse exercise; HEC, health education classes; HRT, heavy-resistance strength training; L, low risk; N, no; N/A, not applicable; RT, resistance training; SV, side alternating
vibration; TCC, tai chi chih; U, unclear; VFDWBV, visual feedback-deprived and whole body vibration; VV, vertical vibration; WBV, whole body vibration; WL, waiting list; Y, yes.
Ageing: biology and nutrition
34 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 2. Frail older adults
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Corrie et al. [19] Referred to an outpatient
falls prevention service
Usual falls prevention
program. 6/week.
1 h exercise class
and information
relevant to falls
n.d.a. n.d.a.
Sham: n¼20. Age
79.1 7.8 years
3/week. 12 weeks
vibration sessions
SV: leg power: $;
maximal force
output: $
SV: PASE: $; NEADL:
$; TUG: $;
functional reach: $;
CST: $; 4SS: $
SV: n¼20. Age
79.5 5.7 years
2–430s bouts in
week 1 and up to 6
1 min by week 8
VV: leg power: $^;
maximal force
output: $
VV: PASE: $; NEADL:
$; TUG: $;
functional reach: $;
CST: $; 4SS: $
VV: n¼21. Age
81.9 5.7 years
VV versus SV versus
Sham
Sham: leg power: $;
maximal force
output: $
Sham: PASE: $;
NEADL: z; TUG: z;
functional reach: $;
CST: "z; 4SS: $
Kim et al. [24
&&
] Frail women. community-
dwelling
DEXA Smedley-type
dynamometer
CT: n¼33. Age
81.1 2.8 years
CT: 60 min. 2/week for
3 months. Warm-up.
30 min RT. 20 min of
balance and gait
training
CT: BDNF: "0.56z;
beta 2 microglobulin:
$0.06; myostatin:
$0.19; (IGFBP3/
IGF1) 100: "0.36z;
GH: "0.6z
CT: appendicular
skeletal MM: $0.10;
leg MM: $0.12
CT: grip strength:
$0.13; knee
extension strength:
$0.20
CT: n.d.a.: exhaustion:
z#; low physical
activity: "z; WGS:
"0.37z; TUG:
#0.98z~
Placebo: n¼32. Age
80.3 3.3 years
Placebo: whole milk
powder
Placebo: BDNF:
$0.19; beta 2
microglobulin:
$0.20; myostatin:
$0.15; (IGFBP3/
IGF1) 100: $0.40;
GH: $0.18
Placebo: appendicular
skeletal MM: $0.06;
leg MM: $0.08
Placebo: grip strength:
$0.07; knee
extension strength:
$0.04
Placebo: n.d.a.
WGS: $0.22; TUG:
$0.07
Reid et al. [34
&&
] 52 participants RT: 2/week.
16 weeks
Muscle size: computed
tomography
1RM SPPB
n.d.a. n.d.a. n.d.a.
LO: n¼25. Age 78.3 5
years
LO group: 3 10
repetitions at 40%
1RM
LO: $LO: 1RM: "z; peak
power 408:$; peak
power 708:$
LO: "z
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 35
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 2 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
HI: n¼27.
Age ¼77.6 4 years
HI group: 3 10
repetitions at 70%
1RM
HI: $HI: 1RM: "z; peak
power 408:$; peak
power 708:$
HI: "z
Community-dwelling
Difficulty in a mobility-
related task
Tieland et al. [41
&
] Prefrail and frail DEXA 1RM SPPB
RT: n¼62. Age
78.4 1.0 years
RT: 2/week.
24 weeks.
3–410 –15
repetitions at 50%
1RM up to 8– 10
repetitions at 75%
1RM.
RT: LBM: $0.09;
appendicular LBM:
$1.27
RT: leg press: "8.82z;
leg extension:
"8.24z~; dominant
HG: "1.04z;
nondominant HG:
"1.08z
RT: "3.25~
Control: n¼65. Age
79.5 1.0 years
Control: no intervention Control: LBM: $0.08;
appendicular LBM:
$0.18
Control: leg press:
$2.79; leg
extension: $2.67;
dominant HG:
"0.56z; nondominant
HG: "0.92z
Control: $1.70
Yamada et al. [45
&&
] Age 65 years
Community-dwelling;
frail
W: n¼15 W group: pedometer-
based walking
program. 6 months.
increase daily steps
by 10% each month
W: SMI: "0,09z~
Control: n¼25 Control: no program Control: SMI: #0.30z
Results are given as prepost intervention: ", increase postintervention; #, decrease postintervention; $, no change; z, significant result in group; ~, significant difference between groups; ^, significance between first
group and last group; AT, aerobic training; CT, combined training; GH, growth hormone; n.d.a., no data available to calculate effect size; RT, resistance training; SV, side alternating vibration; VV, vertical vibration;
W, walk.
Ageing: biology and nutrition
36 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3. Healthy nonfrail older adults
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Andersen et al.
[12
&
]
Healthy men 16 weeks. 2/week.
1 h/session
DEXA
SG: n¼9. Age
68.0 4.0 years
SG: weeks 1– 12:
315 min; weeks
13– 52: 4 15 min
SG: FM: $0.72; LBM:
0.35^
RT: n¼9. Age
69.1 3.1 years
RT: 3 16– 20 RM
(weeks 0– 4). 3 12
RM (weeks 5– 8).
310 RM (weeks
9– 12) and 4 8RM
(weeks 13– 52)
RT: FM: $0.38;
LBM:1.54 ~
CG: n¼8. Age
67.4 2.7 years
CG: no intervention CG: FM: $0.03; LBM:
$0.23
Aranda-Garcı
´aet
al. [13]
12 weeks. 60 min. 3/
week
Dynamometer:
CT: n¼17. Age
70.5 7.1 years
CT: AT þRT 1/week:
8– 10 exercises. 8–
12 repetitions
CT: KES 908:"0.53z;
KES: 608:$0.30;
handgrip: "1.02z
CT: WGS: $0.27; PA:
$n.d.a.
HE: n¼10. Age
72.2 7.7 years
HE: exercises on the
ground interacting
with the
horse þexercises on
the horse
HE: KES 908:"1.06z;
KES 608:$0.50;
handgrip: $0.17
HE: WGS: "0.72z; PA:
$n.d.a.
C: n¼11. Age
71.9 5.4 years
CON: no training CON: KES 908:
$0.04; KES 608:
$0.16; handgrip:
$0.55
C: WGS: $0.15; PA:
$n.d.a.
Beurskens et al.
[14
&&
]
Healthy male adults 13 weeks. 3/week.
60 min
BL, ULR and ULL
HRT: n¼19. Age
66.4 4.9 years
Bilateral HRT: RT at
80% of 1RM. 3 10
repetitions
HRT: BL: "0.46z^;
ULR: "0.37z^; ULL:
"1.23z^
BAL: n¼14. Age
66.3 5.3 years
BAL: balancing tasks
and exercises on soft
mats. Wobble boards
and uneven surfaces.
420 s
BAL: BL: "0.50z^;
ULR: "0.52z^; ULL:
"0.99z^
CON: n¼20. Age
66.7 4.0 years
CON: no training.
Follow regular
routines
CON: BL: #0.30z; ULR:
#0.23z; ULL: #0.17z
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 37
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Canuto Wanderley
et al. [17
&&
]
Community-dwelling.
physically
independent
3/week. 8 months.
session: 50 min
DEXA Accelerometer
AT: n¼24. Age
70.0 5.7 years
AT: 30 min walking/
biking
RT: BFM: #0.73z^;
LBM: $0.09
RT: 6 MWT: $0.34;
stair ascent: #2.5z
^; 8 FUG: #1.5z^;
sit-to-stand: #1.8 z^;
handgrip: $1; PA:
"0.46z
RT: n¼19. Age
67.3 4.9 years
RT: month 1: 2 12–
15 repetitions at 50–
60% of 1RM. Months
2– 8: 2 12
repetitions at 80% of
1RM
AT: BFM: #0.74z^;
LBM: $0.06
AT: 6 MWT: "0.56 z^;
stair ascent: #5.00
z^; 8 FUG: 3.5 z^;
sit-to-stand: #3.4z^;
handgrip: $0.5; PA:
"0.21z
WL: n¼31. Age
67.8 5.5 years
WL: call after 4 months.
No changing of
lifestyle
WL: BFM: $0.08;
LBM: $0.13
WL: 6 MWT: $0.03;
stair ascent: $0.5;
8FUG: $0.5; sit-to-
stand: $1.25;
handgrip: $0; PA:
$0.04
Carneiro et al. [18
&
] Older women RT: 1 set of 10– 15
repetitions of 1RM
DEXA Training load (kg)
G2:n¼28. Age
67.6 5.3 years
G2:2/week G3:
3/week
G2: mm: n.d.a. "z G2: n.d.a. $
G3:n¼25. Age
67.0 5.6 years
G3: mm: n.d.a. "z G3: n.d.a. $~
Dias et al. [20
&
] Healthy elderly women 12 weeks. 2/week.
Weeks 1 þ2. 2 12
repetitions at 40%
1RM. Week 3 þ4at
50% 1RM. Weeks
5þ6. 2 10
repetitions at 55%
1RM. Week 7 þ8at
60% 1RM. Week
9þ10 3 8
repetitions at 65%.
Week 11 þ12 at
70% 1RM
Maximal dynamic
strength (1RM)
n.d.a.
n.d.a.
Ageing: biology and nutrition
38 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
ETG: n¼9. Age
65.6 5.6 years
CTG: n¼10. Age
67.8 6.5 years
ETG: concentric 1.5 s.
Eccentric 4.5 s
CTG: concentric 1.5 s.
Eccentric phases
1.5 s
ETG: LP: $; knee
extension: "z
CTG: leg pres: $; knee
extension: "z
CTG: 6 MWT: "z; TUG:
#z; stair climbing: "z;
CST: #z
ETG: 6 MWT: "z; TUG:
#z; stair climbing: "z;
CST: #z
Emerson et al. [21
&
] Living independently DEXA 1RM
RT: n¼11. Age
72.1 6.6 years
RT: 2/week. 6 weeks.
3 sets. 8– 15
repetitions at 70–
85% of 1RM
RT: FM: $0.03. LBM:
$0.01
RT: "0.82z~RT: PWCFT: $0.49;
CST: #1.23z;W:
#0.85z
C: n¼12. Age
70.3 5.6 years
CON: no training C: FM$. LBM: $0.01 C: $0.16 C: PWCFT: $0.03;
CST: #0.42z;W:
$0.32
Forti et al. [22
&&
] Community-dwelling RT: 3/week. 12
weeks
HIGH: n¼18. Age
67.9 4.4 years
HIGH group: 2 10–
15 repetitions at 80%
of 1RM
HIGH: IL-6: $0.47
sTNFR1: "0.13z
IL-1RA: $0.16
IL-8: "0.26z
LOW: n¼19. Age
68.9 5.3 years
LOW group: 1 60
repetitions at 20% of
1RM
LOW: IL-6: $0.16
sTNFR1: "0.21z
IL-1RA: $0.31
IL-8: "0.59z
LOWþ:n¼19. Age
67.6 6.0 years
LOWþ:160
repetitions at 20% of
1RM immediately
followed by 1 10–
20 repetitions at 40%
of 1RM
LOWþ: IL-6: $0.07
sTNFR1: "0.14z
IL-1RA: $0.31
IL-8: "0.76z
Irving et al. [23
&&
] Older adults. Sedentary DEXA 1RM
CON/CT: n¼12. Age
71 2 years
AT: n¼11. Age 70 1
years
AT: cycling at 65%
VO
2
peak 1 h. 5/
week. 8 weeks
AT: BFM (%): $; BFM
(kg): #0.18z; LBM
(kg): "z; midthigh
skeletal muscle (cm
2
):
"0.16z
AT: CP (kg): $0.08; LP
(kg): "0.41z
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 39
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
RT: n¼10. Age 70 1
years
RT: 4 sets of 8–10
repetitions. 4 /
week. 8 weeks
RT: BFM (%): $; BFM
(kg): $; LBM (kg):
$; midthigh skeletal
muscle (cm2): $0.23
RT: CP (kg): "0.31z;LP
(kg): "0.69z
CON: BFM (%): $;
BFM (kg): $; LBM
(kg): $; midthigh
skeletal muscle (cm2):
$0.03
CON: CP (kg): $0.07;
LP (kg): $0.00
CT: no exercise for 8
weeks (CON).
followed 8 weeks of
CT: cycling 30 min
5/week and 2/3
the RT volume 4
days/week
CT: CP (kg): n.d.a. "z;
LP (kg): n.d.a."z
Lee et al. [25
&&
] 27 women
65– 75 years
DEXA Isokinetic strength
CT: n¼9 CT: AT. Walking at
40– 70% heart rate.
3/week þRT 2/
week. Elastic bands
15– 20 repetitions.
intensity: 10– 13 on
Borg’s scale. 8
weeks
CT: CRP#1.45 z~
IL-6: #1.11 z
TNF-a:#0.49z
CT: body mass: #0.06z
BFM: #0.66z
LBM: $0.33~
BF: #0.72z
WHR: $0.09
CT: left knee extension:
"0.86z~
left knee flexion:
"0.43z~
right knee
extension: "0.97z~
right knee flexion:
$0.32
AT: n¼10 AT: walking. 5/week.
8 weeks. Walking at
40– 70% of HRR for
40 min
AT: CRP: #1.05 z
IL-6: #0.59 z
TNF-a:#0.62 z
AT: body mass: #0.34z
BFM: #0.51z
LBM: $0.19
BF: #0.67z
WHR: $0.23
AT: left knee extension:
$0.09
left knee flexion:
$0.05
right knee
extension: $0.06
right knee flexion:
$0.08
Libardi et al. [26] 4 days/week. 12
weeks
CSA 1RM
Ageing: biology and nutrition
40 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
CT: n¼8. Age ¼65
3.7 years
CT: W/run 40 min at
60– 85% VO
2
peak.
After week 6:
50 min. 4 10
repetitions 70% 1RM.
After 6 weeks: 80%
1RM
CT: "0.26zCT: "0.92z
BFR-CT: n¼10.
Age ¼64 4 years
BFR-CT: BFR-RT and ET:
130 repetitions
and 3 15
repetitions 20% 1RM.
After 6 weeks 30%;
ET same as other
group
BFR-CT: "0.27zBFR-CT: "0.46z
CG: n¼7. n¼8.
Age ¼65 4 years
CG: no training CG: $0.07 CG: $0.25
Sedentary. Not obese.
No CVD
Markovic et al. [28] 30 women
Age: 70 4 years
8 weeks. 3/week
Huber group: n¼16 Huber: combined core
and balance
exercises 25– 30 min.
Interactive interface.
Weeks 1– 2: 50% of
MVC. Weeks 3– 5
over 65% MVC.
Weeks 6– 8 75% of
MVC. 30– 60
contractions per
session
Huber group: body
mass: $0.09; body
fat: #0.48z
Huber group: isometric
trunk extension:
"0.98z; isometric
trunk flexion: "1.19z;
isometric trunk right
lateral flexion:
"1.12z; isometric
trunk left lateral
flexion: "1.17z;
upper body: "0.43z;
lower body power:
"0.47z
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 41
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Pilates group: n¼14 Pilates: 3 1 h. Core
stability. Each
exercise for 2– 4 sets
with 15– 20 s
contraction time or
15– 20 repetitions
Pilates: body mass:
$0.07; body fat:
$0.05
Pilates group: isometric
trunk extension:
$0.12; isometric
trunk flexion: $0.14;
isometric trunk right
lateral flexion:
$0.04; isometric
trunk left lateral
flexion: $0.05;
upper body: "0.22z;
lower body power:
$0.06
Martins et al. [29] DEXA
RT: n¼20. Age
69.1 6.3 years
RT: 2-week
familiarization þ8
week strength
training 2/week
RT: ULFFM: $0.19
LLFFM: $0.03
RT: handgrip strength:
$0.10
PT 608/s: $0.08
PT 1208/s: "0.14z
CG: n¼20. Age
66.2 6.6 years
CG: did not receive
any specific training
or placebo condition
CG: ULFFM: $0.00
LLFFM: $0.00
CG: handgrip strength:
$0.03
PT 608/s: $0.02
PT 1208/s: $0.06
Nicholson et al.
[30]
Healthy
postmenopausal
women
FM (DEXA) LP. Bench press (1RM)
RT: n¼24. Age
66 4.4 years
RT 2/week
bodypump class.
50 min/class. 6
months. 10 tracks.
each up to 6 min
RT: $0.05 RT: LP: "0.51z
BP: "0.6z
CON: n¼26. Age
66 4.5 years
CON: no training CON: $0.05 CON: LP: $0.04
BP: $0.00
Nishida et al. [31
&
] Females
Ageing: biology and nutrition
42 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
AT: n¼31. Age
70.4 5.8 years
AT: bench step: height
15– 20 cm. step
rhythm at 40 steps/
min and increased by
10 steps/min every
4 min. separated by
2-min rest intervals.
3/day 10– 20 min
each session. For a
goal of 140 min/
week. At home for
12 weeks
AT: IL-4: $0.05
IL-5: $0.03
IL-6: $0.09
IL-8: $0.08
IL-15: $0.21
IFN-g:$0.21~
TNF-a:$0.12
TNF-b:$0.07
CG: n¼31. Age
69.7 6.6 years
CG: normal lifestyle CG: IL-4: $0.18
IL-5: $0.19
IL-6: $0.27
IL-8: $0.07
IL-15: $0.13
IFN-g:$0.36
TNF-a:$0.07
TNF-b:$0.18
Padilha et al. [32
&&
] 27 older women 30 weeks: 12 weeks
RT þ12 weeks
detraining period þ6
weeks data collection
1RM
G2:n¼13. Age
68.9 5.0 years
110– 15 repetitions
at 1RM
G2: CP: "0.89z
KES: "0.83z
preacher curl: "1.80z
G3:n¼14. Age
68.7 4.8 years
RT 2/week (G2)G3: CP: "2.42z~
KES: "0.67z~
preacher curl:
"2.10z~
Physically independent RT 3/week (G3)
Perchthaler et al.
[33]
Healthy. Physically
active older adults
Maximal isokinetic
muscle strength
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 43
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
WBV: n¼13; 5 men
and 8 women; Age.
54.9 9.0 years
WBV: 12 training
sessions. 6 weeks.
Warm-up at 18 Hz.
Frequency of 30 Hz
combined with an
amplitude of 3.9 mm
and a knee angle of
608. Rest time
between each
repetition was 60 s.
120 s between
exercises
WBV: right leg
extension: $0.08
left leg extension:
$0.14
right leg flexion:
$0.06
left leg flexion:
$0.13
CO: n¼8; 2 men and
6 women. Age
54.5 6.3 years
CG: no change in
physical activity
CO: right leg
extension: $0.09;
left leg extension:
$0.21; right leg
flexion: $0.01; left
leg flexion: $0.25
Rossi et al. [35] Postmenopausal women AT: running track: 400,
800 and 1200 m
fastest possible
DEXA
CT: n¼35. Age
60.3 6.1 years
CT: 57 min: 27 min
RT þ30 min AT. RT:
weeks 1– 4: 3 15
repetitions at 65% of
1RM; weeks 5– 8:
312 repetitions at
70% of 1RM; weeks
9–12: 3–4 10
repetitions at 75%;
weeks 13– 16: 3–
48 repetitions at
80% of 1RM
AT: FM (kg): #0.34z;
FM (%): #0.22z;
FFM: "0.12z^
AT: n¼35. Age
60.5 7.3 years
CG: no intervention CT: FM (kg): #0.18z;
FM (%): #0.31z^;
FFM: "0.20z^
CG: n¼34. Age
62.6 5.9 years
CG: FM (kg): $0.03;
FM (%): $0.01;
FFM: $0.07
Ageing: biology and nutrition
44 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Ruiz et al. [36] Planning to stay in the
same nursing home.
Ambulant
n.d.a. 1RM
n.d.a.
n.d.a.
RT: n¼20. Age
92.3 2.3 years
RT: standard
care þ8 weeks.
40– 45-min
intervention
3/week. 2– 3 sets
of 8– 10 repetitions
at 30% 1RM at the
start of the program
to 70% of 1RM at the
end. 4-week
detraining period
RT: ACE: $; sAPP: $;
BDNF: $; EGF: $;
TNF-a:$
RT: LP: "z RT: 8 MWT: $; 4SS:
$; TUG: $;MMSE:
$; GDS: $
CON: n¼20. Age
92.1 2.3 years
CON: informed of
effects of PA. Daily
mobility exercises
CON: ACE: $; sAPP:
$; BDNF: $; EGF:
$; TNF-a:$
CON: $CON: 8 MWT: $;
4SS: $; TUG: $;
MMSE: $; GDS: $
Sitja
`-Rabert et al.
[38]
Healthy older adults 6 weeks. 3/week n.d.a.
WBV: n¼59. Age
64.6 0.7 years
WBV: static/dynamic
exercise; 30– 35 Hz
and amplitude
2–4mm
WBV: TUG: $; 5 times
sit-to-stand: "z
RT: n¼58. Age
63.9 0.8 years
RT: static and dynamic
exercise
RT: TUG: $; 5 times sit-
to-stand: "z
Strandberg et al.
[39
&
]
Recreationally
physically active
women
DEXA 1RM Physical activity
(accelorometry)
RT: n¼21.
Age 68 2 years
RT: 24 weeks. 2/
week. 8– 12
repetitions at
75– 85% of 1RM
RT: CRP: $0.10; IL-6:
$0.02
RT: lean leg mass:
$0.03; lean FM:
$0.10; leg BMD:
$0.12
RT: "0.96z~RT: $0.20
CON: n¼21. Age
68 1 years
CON: no intervention CON: CRP: $1.12; IL-
6: $0.00
CON: lean leg mass:
$0.12; lean FM:
$0.12; leg BMD:
$0.09
CON: $0.01 CON: $0.30
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 45
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Su et al. [40
&
] Older adults. Mean
Age 65.3 years
TC þWTC: 4– 5 60-min
sessions/week of tai
chi training.
4 months
TC: 308/s: KES:
"0.32~; knee
flexors: $~;
plantarflexors: $~;
dorsiflexors:
$0.63~^;1208/s:
KES: $0.12~; knee
flexors: $0.36~
CON: n¼16 WTC: wearing a
weighted vest
WTC: 308/s: KES:
"1.29z^; knee
flexors: "0.24z^;
plantarflexors:
"0.83z^;
dorsiflexors: "1.0z^;
1208/s: KES:
"1.52z^; knee
flexors: "0.98z^
TC group: n¼17 CON: no intervention CON: 308/s: KES:
$0.22; knee flexors:
$0.00;
plantarflexors:
$0.18; dorsiflexors:
$0.00; 1208/s:
KES: $0.04; knee
flexors: $0.15
WTC: n¼16
Tseng et al. [42] Healthy n.d.a.
Age: 69.22 3.97
years
WBV: n¼14 WBV: 3/week. 5min.
Amplitude of 4 mm at
20 Hz
WBV: KES: "z; knee
flexor: $
VFDWBV: n¼17 Visual feedback-
deprived and WBV
(VFDWBV): blindfold
to block their visual
feedback during
WBV
VFDWBV: knee
extensor: "z; knee
flexor: "z
CON: n¼14 CON: 0 Hz. Eyes open CON: KESr: $; knee
flexor: $
Ageing: biology and nutrition
46 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 3 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Villanueva et al.
[43
&&
]
Men RT: 36 sessions.
12 weeks: 4-week
AT (2 15 to 4 8
repetitions). Followed
by 8-week RT (2 6
to 3 4 repetitions)
DEXA Muscle strength (1RM)
SS: n¼11. Age
65.6 3.4 years
SS: short rest interval
length sets: 60 s
SS: LBM: "0.27z~; fat
mass: $0.17
SS: CP: "1.14z~; LP:
"2.05z~
SS: margaria (time):
#1.90z; margaria
(power): "1.86~z;
400 m W: #1.81z
SL: n¼11. Age
70.3 4.9 years
SL: long rest interval
length sets: 4 min
SL: LBM "0.09z; fat
mass: $0.10
SL: CP"1.07z;LP"1.40zSL: margaria (time):
#1.90z; margaria
(power): "1.59z;
400 m W: #1.08z
Yamada et al.
[45
&&
]
Age 65 years
Community-dwelling;
nonfrail
W: n¼55 W group: pedometer-
based walking
program. 6 months.
Increase daily steps
by 10% each month
W: SMI: #0.12~
CON: n¼50 CON: no program CON: SMI: "0.00z
Results are given as prepost intervention: "¼increase postintervention; #¼decrease postintervention; $¼no change; z¼significant result in group; ~¼significant difference between groups; ^¼significance between
first group and last group; n.d.a. ¼no data available to calculate effect size. AT, aerobic training; BAL, balance training; BFR-CT, blood-flow restriction combined training group; BFR-RT, blood-flow restriction resistance
training group; BL, bilateral; CG, control group; CON, control; CP, chest press; CT, combined training; CTG, conventional training group; ET, eccentric-focused training; ETG, eccentric-focused training group; FFM, fat-
free mass; HE, horse exercise; HEC, health education classes; HRT, heavy-resistance strength training; LLFFM, lower limb fat-free mass; LP, leg press; MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; RT, resistance training; SG,
soccer group; TC, tai chi; TCC, tai chi chih; ULFFM, upper limb fat-free mass; ULL, unilateral left; ULR, unilateral right; VFDWBV, visual feedback-deprived and whole body vibration; W, walk; WBV, whole body
vibration; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; WTC, weighted tai chi.
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 47
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Table 4. Older adults with a specific disease
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
Camillo et al.
[15]
COPD patients DW: negative inclination
of 10%
CK:
BMI <30 kg/m
2
DWL: addition of a vest.
10% of weight
LW: $0.18
n¼10.
Age 67 7 years
LW: without inclination DW: "0.66z
As long as possible up to
20 min
DWL: "0.37z
Campo et al.
[16]
Senior female cancer
survivors
60 min. 3/ week.
12 weeks
n.d.a.
Diagnosis of solid tumor
cancer. Stages I– III,
3 months since
treatment completion
TCC: n¼29. Age 65.9
years
TCC group: 19
nonstrenuous
movements. 10 min of
closing movements
TCC: cortisol: $~; IL-
12: $; IL-6: $;TNF-
a:$; IL-10: $; IL-4:
$
HEC: n¼25. Age 66.7
years
HEC: topics relevant to
aging
HEC: cortisol: $; IL-12:
$; IL-6: $;TNF-a:
$; IL-10: $; IL-4: $
Lima et al.
[27
&&
]
AH 10 weeks. 3/week
AT: n¼15. Age
67.8 4.3 years
AT: 20 min in weeks 1 – 4.
30 min in weeks 5– 10
AT: IL-6: #1.36z^;
TNF-a:$0.26
CT: n¼15. Age
67.8 5.2 years
CT: 1 circuit lap (weeks
1– 4). 2 laps (weeks
5– 10) at 50 –60% 1RM.
5 repetitions upper
limbs. 20 repetitions
trunk and lower limbs
CT: IL-6: $0.31; TNF-
a:$0.33^
CG: n¼14. Age
69.9 5.5 years
CG: no training CG: IL-6: $0.40; TNF-
a:$0.09
Salhi et al. [37] Patients with COPD.
Referred to
rehabilitation
3/week. 12 weeks QF
n.d.a.
6 MWT
n.d.a.
WBV: n¼31. Age 58
(55– 73) years
WBV: 27 Hz. 2 mm peak
amplitude. 30– 1 min.
1– 3 repetitions
WBV: $WBV: "z~
RT: n¼31. Age 63
(57– 68) years
RT: 3 10 repetitions at
70% of 1RM
RT: "z RT: "z
Winters-Stone et
al. [44
&&
]
Men. Prostate cancer.
Currently receiving
ADT
1RM
Ageing: biology and nutrition
48 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
among others – characteristics as weakness, slow
walking speed and reduced physical activity (see
other articles in this issue for details about the frailty
phenotype). Aerobic training and resistance train-
ing can play an important role in reducing inflam-
mation and increasing muscle strength and muscle
mass [49]. Sarcopenia is more pronounced in frail
elderly [50]. However, several studies showed that
despite frailty, physical functioning can be
improved after different kinds of exercises [51 – 53].
After a combined training intervention, inflam-
matory markers improved significantly, including
increased BDNF (effect size ¼0.56), IGF-1 (effect
size ¼0.36) and growth hormone (effect size ¼0.60)
[24
&&
].
Investigating body composition after resistance
training at low, moderate or high intensity, none of
the studies showed significant changes in muscle
mass, LBM or muscle size [24
&&
,34
&&
,41
&
]. However,
another study reported a small but significant
improvement of muscle mass (effect size ¼0.09)
after a 1-year walking program compared with non-
exercising controls in whom muscle mass decreased
(effect size ¼0.30) [45
&&
].
Muscle strength increased following resistance
training, with a large effect size for the leg press
(effect size ¼8.82) and leg extension (effect
size ¼8.24) as reported by Tieland et al. [41
&
]; note-
worthy, Reid et al. [34
&&
] found no significant differ-
ences in strength gains when comparing resistance
training at high (70% 1RM, effect size ¼n.d.a.) and
low (40% 1RM, effect size ¼n.d.a.) intensity.
Four studies investigated the changes in daily
physical functioning. The SPPB was significantly
improved after resistance training, regardless of
the intensity [34
&&
,41
&
]. In frail older adults, none
of the included studies investigated the effects of
aerobic training on physical functioning, although
others suggest that aerobic training and especially
combined training can improve CLIP, muscle
strength and muscle mass of frail older adults
[49]. It should be noted that WBV significantly
improved muscle strength compared with sham
WBV, but not physical functioning [19].
Overall, only few articles were retrieved that
specifically reported on frail older persons, and future
exercise trials should focus more on this important
population. Moreover, none of the included articles
compared different types of exercises, complicating
an overall recommendation on the preferred exercise
modality for frail older persons.
Exercise effects in healthy nonfrail older adults
Twenty-four studies including healthy, nonfrail
older adults performing an exercise intervention
Table 4 (Continued )
Inflammation Body composition Muscle strength Function
References Population Intervention effect effect effect effect
POWIR: n¼29. Age
69.9 9.3 years
POWIR: 2 classes þ1
home-based session/
week. 12 months. RT:
free weights
POWIR: bench press:
"0.22z~; leg press:
"0.48z~
POWIR: CST:
$0.83; 4 m
WGS: $0.47;
4 m fast WGS:
$0.28; PPB:
$0.65
FLEX: n¼22. Age
70.5 7.8 years
FLEX: stretching and
relaxation exercises
FLEX: bench press:
$0.06; leg press:
$0.03
FLEX: CST: $0.50;
4 m usual WGS:
$0.34; 4 m fast
walk: $0.60;
PPB: $0.36
Results are given as prepost intervention: "¼increase postintervention; #¼decrease postintervention; $¼no change; z¼significant result in group; ~¼significant difference between groups; ^¼significance between
first group and last group; AH, arterial hypertension; AT, aerobic training; CT, combined training; DW, downhill walking; DWL, downhill walking þload; LW, level walking; n.d.a., no data available to calculate effect
size; RT, resistance training.
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 49
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
were included. Six reported data on the inflamma-
tory profile [22
&&
,25
&&
,31
&
,36,39
&
,45
&&
], 14 on body
composition [12
&
,17
&&
,18
&
,21
&
,23
&&
,25
&&
,26,28–30,
35,39
&
,43
&&
,45
&&
], 18 on muscle strength [13,14
&&
,
18
&
,20
&
,21
&
,23
&&
,25
&&
,26,28–30,32
&&
,33,36,39
&
,40
&
,
42,43
&&
] and eight on physical functioning
[13,17
&&
,20
&
,21
&
,36,38,39
&
,43
&&
].
Lee et al. showed that in older women,
proinflammatory cytokines such as CRP (effect
size ¼1.45), TNF-a(effect size ¼0.49) and IL-6
(effect size ¼1.11) decreased after 8 weeks of com-
bined training. Interestingly, inflammatory markers
also decreased after aerobic training (effect
size ¼1.05 for CRP, effect size ¼0.59 for IL-6 and
effect size ¼0.62 for TNF-a). However, only for CRP
a significant difference between the effects of com-
bined training and aerobic training was reported
[25
&&
]. sTNFR1 and IL-8 significantly increased after
all three resistance training interventions in a study
investigating the effects of different intensities of
resistance training (HIGH, LOW and LOWþ; refer to
Table 3 for details) [22
&&
]. For sTNFR1, the effect size
was rather small, though for IL-8, medium effect size
was obtained for the LOW group (effect size ¼0.59)
and a large effect size (effect size ¼0.76) for the
LOWþgroup. No significant differences between
groups were observed, but training at HIGH external
load also increased anti-inflammatory IL-1ra in male
participants, which might be beneficial in combat-
ing CLIP [22
&&
]. In addition, Yamada et al. [45
&&
]
found a significant increase in IGF-1 (effect
size ¼0.43) following aerobic training compared
with control (effect size ¼0.21).
Regarding the effect of exercise on body com-
position, most studies revealed a significant increase
in LBM [23
&&
,43
&&
]. As shown in Table 3, changes in
LBM were significantly different when comparing
soccer with resistance training [12
&
], combined
training with aerobic training [25
&&
] or short rest
interval with long rest interval during a resistance
training intervention [43
&&
]. These studies confirm
that physical exercise positively influences LBM in
older adults and enforce previously published evi-
dence [10]. BFM decreased significantly after exer-
cise. Following a Huber exercise intervention, a
medium effect was obtained (effect size ¼0.46)
[28], whereas larger effects were observed after
combined training (effect size ¼0.66) [25
&&
], aerobic
training (effect size ¼0.51 [25
&&
] and effect
size ¼0.74 [17
&&
]) or resistance training (effect
size ¼0.73) [17
&&
]. When looking at the effects of
exercise on muscle mass, a significant increase was
observed following resistance training (effect
size ¼n.d.a.) [18
&
] as well as aerobic training (effect
size ¼0.16) [23
&&
]. Combined training significantly
improved quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area
(effect size ¼0.26 and 0.27 following, respectively,
conventional combined training and combined
training with blood flow restriction) [26].
Out of the 18 articles reporting data on changes
in muscle strength after an exercise intervention,
five compared different types of exercises, whereas
in seven articles different intensities of the same
intervention were compared; 11 studies compared
the effects of exercise with a nonexercising control
group. Resistance training interventions signifi-
cantly improved both lower limb (leg extension
effect size ¼0.82 [21
&
], effect size ¼0.96 [39
&
]
and effect size ¼0.14 [29]; leg press effect
size ¼0.69 [23
&&
], effect size ¼0.51 [30] and effect
size ¼n.d.a. [20
&
,36]; and bilateral leg strength
effect size ¼0.46 [14
&&
]) and upper limb (chest press
effect size ¼0.31 [23
&&
] and bench press effect
size ¼0.60 [30]) strength. Carneiro et al. [18
&
] inves-
tigated different modalities of resistance training
and found significant differences in effects obtained
between the group training twice and the group
training three times in a week. Similar findings were
reported in another study performed by Padilha
et al. [32
&&
]. Interestingly, Villanueva et al. [43
&&
]
showed that in older men significantly greater
improvements can be obtained when performing
4-week resistance training with a short (1 min) than
with a long (4 min) rest interval between the exercise
sets. These findings need to be confirmed in longer
studies with larger sample size and might lead in the
future to adapted resistance training prescription
guidelines for older adults. Regarding the effects
of combined training, significant improvements
in muscle strength were reported by Irving et al.
[23
&&
] (effect size ¼n.d.a.). It should be noted that
other studies showed that there were no significant
differences in effects obtained between concentric-
focused or eccentric-focused resistance training
[20
&
], between regular combined training or com-
bined training with blood flow restriction [26] nor
between Huber and Pilates exercise [28]. Another
study compared horse exercise and traditional com-
bined training with a nonexercising control group.
Their results suggest that muscle strength increases
with large and medium effect sizes (effect size ¼1.06
and 0.53, respectively) following horse and com-
bined training exercise, though without significant
difference between both types of exercise [13]. The
study by Su et al. [40
&
] suggests that tai chi with
weighted vests can lead to significantly better
improvements of muscle strength compared with
regular tai chi, which might be explained by the
greater external load during training.
Only eight included studies reported on changes
in physical functioning after an exercise interven-
tion. Overall, physical functioning was significantly
Ageing: biology and nutrition
50 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
improved after exercise (resistance training, aerobic
training, WBV and horse exercise), and large effect
sizes (effect size 0.74) were obtained in parameters
measuring physical functioning such as chair stand
test, 400-m walk distance and other [13,17
&&
,
20
&
,21
&
,38,43
&&
] (Table 3).
We can conclude that most included articles
investigated resistance training. Those studies com-
paring different types of exercise reported no sig-
nificant differences in the effects obtained on
physical functioning. It seems that for the effects
of resistance training on inflammation or muscle
strength, the exercise modalities (intensity and rest
interval between sets) can influence the effects
obtained, which warrants more exploration of the
underlying pathways in future research. As a final
point, muscle strength seemed to be the most fre-
quently used outcome measure, regardless the exer-
cise intervention studied.
Exercise effects in older adults with a
specific disease
Six studies were identified investigating the effects
of an exercise intervention in older adults with a
specific disease or disorder, including COPD, cancer
and arterial hypertension (AH) (Table 4). Three
studies looked at changes in the inflammatory pro-
file [15,16,27
&&
,54
&
], two at muscle strength [37,44
&&
]
and two investigated changes in physical function-
ing [37,44
&&
].
IL-6 was the only cytokine that showed signifi-
cant changes after an exercise intervention, which
decreased after 10 weeks of aerobic training (effect
size ¼1.36) in older persons with AH [27
&&
]. One
study focused only on creatine kinase in COPD
patients, which was significantly elevated after
downhill walking interventions, both with or with-
out carrying an external load (effect size ¼0.37 and
0.66, respectively) [15]. The inflammatory outcomes
in these studies showed similar effects as previously
described in other studies, which suggest that
physical exercise mediates an anti-inflammatory
response [55] and has positive effects on several
diseases [8].
No studies were found investigating exercise-
induced changes in body composition. Of note, in
patients after acute myocardial infarction, Oliveira
et al. [54
&
] recently failed to detect significant effects
of 8 weeks of aerobic training on BFM nor on
inflammatory biomarkers. It must be mentioned
that their participants were younger (aged
55 10.7 years for the aerobic training group),
and it cannot be excluded that older patients might
benefit more from exercise interventions compared
with younger ones. In both studies investigating
muscle strength after resistance training versus con-
trol in prostate cancer survivors and WBV versus
resistance training exercise in COPD patients,
muscle strength consistently showed a significant
increase (effect size ¼0.22– 0.48 and n.d.a., respect-
ively) [37,44
&&
]. This significant increase in muscle
strength is not so surprising, as baseline values
might be lower in these specific patients [56] and
demonstrates the necessity of intensive exercise for
these patients to recover muscle weakness.
Two studies investigate the effects on physical
functioning and showed a significant improvement
of 6-min walk test after both WBV and resistance
training in COPD patients (effect size ¼n.d.a.) [37];
resistance training or flexibility training did not
significantly influence physical function in prostate
cancer patients [44
&&
].
We can conclude that reducing the inflammatory
profile in patients with specific diseases via exercise
seems to be more challenging, although some
positive effects of aerobic training were reported.
None of the included studies investigated the effect
of resistance training on inflammation or body com-
position, and therefore there is an urgent need for
intensifying research in this area. As a final remark, it
must be noted that all studied exercise interventions
were feasible without major complications, and thus
these specific conditions should not be considered as
contraindications for exercise interventions.
CONCLUSION
Few articles focused on exercise in frail older per-
sons. Moderate-to-large exercise effects were noted
on inflammation, muscle strength and physical
functioning. As none of these articles compared
different types of exercise, an overall exercise recom-
mendation for frail older persons is difficult.
In healthy older persons, the effects of resistance
training (most frequently investigated) on inflam-
mation or muscle strength can be influenced by the
exercise modalities (intensity and rest interval
between sets). Muscle strength seemed to be the
most frequently used outcome measure, with mod-
erate-to-large effects obtained regardless of the
exercise intervention studied. Similar effects were
found in patients with specific diseases.
Acknowledgements
None.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 51
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED
READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have
been highlighted as:
&of special interest
&& of outstanding interest
1. Thomas DR. Sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med 2010; 26:331–346.
2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM, et al. Prevalence of and interventions
for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the Interna-
tional Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age Ageing 2014;
43:748– 759.
3. Stewart VH, Saunders DH, Greig CA. Responsiveness of muscle size and
strength to physical training in very elderly people: a systematic review. Scand
J Med Sci Sports 2014; 24:e1 –10.
4. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for
muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev
2010; 9:226–237.
5. St-Onge MP, Gallagher D. Body composition changes with aging: the cause
or the result of alterations in metabolic rate and macronutrient oxidation?
Nutrition 2010; 26:152– 155.
6. Stehr MD, von Lengerke T. Preventing weight gain through exercise and
physical activity in the elderly: a systematic review. Maturitas 2012; 72:13 –
22.
7. Garatachea N, Pareja-Galeano H, Sanchis-Gomar F, et al. Exercise attenu-
ates the major hallmarks of aging. Rejuvenation Res 2015; 18:57 –89.
8. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine – evidence for prescribing
exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports
2015; 25 (Suppl 3):1–72.
9. Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Effects of aerobic exercise on C-reactive protein, body
composition, and maximum oxygen consumption in adults: a meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials. Metabolism 2006; 55:1500 –1507.
10. Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM. Influence of resistance exercise on lean
body mass in aging adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;
43:249– 258.
11. Van Roie E, Delecluse C, Coudyzer W, et al. Strength training at high versus
low external resistance in older adults: effects on muscle volume, muscle
strength, and force-velocity characteristics. Exp Gerontol 2013; 48:1351 –
1361.
12.
&
Andersen TR, Schmidt JF, Pedersen MT, et al. The effects of 52 weeks of
soccer or resistance training on body composition and muscle function in
þ65-year-old healthy males – a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2016;
11:e0148236.
Alternative training interventions can counter other outcome parameters as BMI,
but did not show significant effects on body composition compared with resis-
tance training in healthy men. However, it is interesting to investiga te other kinds of
trainings such as soccer in the future.
13. Aranda-Garci
´a S, Iricibar A, Planas A, et al. Comparative effects of horse
exercise versus traditional exercise programs on gait, muscle strength, and
body balance in healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2015; 23:78– 89.
14.
&&
Beurskens R, Gollhofer A, Muehlbauer T, et al. Effects of heavy-resistance
strength and balance training on unilateral and bilateral leg strength perfor-
mance in old adults. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118535.
Resistance training and balance interventions induced increased muscle strength,
suggesting that balance training can also counter muscle weakness in older male
adults.
15. Camillo CA, Camillo CA, Burtin C, et al. Physiological responses during
downhill walking: a new exercise modality for subjects with chronic obstruc-
tive pulmonary disease? Chron Respir Dis 2015; 12:155 –164.
16. Campo RA, Light KC, O’Connor K, et al. Blood pressure, salivary cortisol,
and inflammatory cytokine outcomes in senior female cancer survivors
enrolled in a tai chi chih randomized controlled trial. J Cancer Surviv
2015; 9:115–125.
17.
&&
Canuto Wanderley FA, Oliveira NL, Marques E, et al. Aerobic versus resis-
tance training effects on health-related quality of life, body composition, and
function of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 2015; 34:N143 –N165.
Comparison between resistance training, aerobic training and control in healthy
older adults. No differences were found between resistance training and aerobic
training, though both improved body composition and physical function with large
effect sizes.
18.
&
Carneiro NH, Ribeiro AS, Nascimento MA, et al. Effects of different resistance
training frequencies on flexibility in older women. Clin Interv Aging 2015;
10:531– 538.
Twelve weeks of resistance training at 2/week and at 3/week induces similar
gains in muscle mass.
19. Corrie H, Brooke-Wavell K, Mansfield NJ, et al. Effects of vertical and side-
alternating vibration training on fall risk factors and bone turnover in older
people at risk of falls. Age Ageing 2015; 44:115 –122.
20.
&
Dias CP, Toscan R, de Camargo M, et al. Effects of eccentric-focused and
conventional resistance training on strength and functional capacity of older
adults. Age (Dordr) 2015; 37:99.
Comparing concentric or eccentric-focused resistance training, no differences
were found. Both increased physical functioning.
21.
&
Emerson NS, Stout JR, Fukuda DH, et al. Resistance training improves
capacity to delay neuromuscular fatigue in older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr
2015; 61:27– 32.
High-intensity resistance training increased muscle strength.
22.
&&
Forti LN, Van Roie E, Njemini R, et al. Load-specific inflammation mediating
effects of resistance training in older persons. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;
17:547– 552.
In this study, effects of different modalities of resistance training were investigated
on the inflammatory profile in older adults. The results showed significant improve-
ments, regardless of the intensity of the resistance training. However, training at
HIGH external load also increased anti-inflammatory IL-1ra in male participants,
which might be beneficial in combating CLIP.
23.
&&
Irving BA, Lanza IR, Henderson GC, et al. Combined training enhances
skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity independent of age. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:1654– 1663.
Study comparing resistance training, aerobic training, combined training and
control in healthy nonfrail older adults. Aerobic training improved body composi-
tion. For muscle strength, resistance training, aerobic training and combined
training show improvements though without difference between types of exercise.
24.
&&
Kim H, Suzuki T, Kim M, et al. Effects of exercise and milk fat globule
membrane (MFGM) supplementation on body composition, physical function,
and hematological parameters in community-dwelling frail Japanese women: a
randomized double blind, placebo-controlled, follow-up trial. PLoS One 2015;
10:e0116256.
In frail older women, the inflammatory profile and physical functioning was sig-
nificantly improved after combined training intervention during 3 months. In this
study, the age of the participants was relatively higher than in other included
studies. However, the intervention was feasible and showed positive results. This
should encourage researchers to perform more studies regarding community-
dwelling frail older adults.
25.
&&
Lee JS, Kim CG, Seo TB, et al. Effects of 8-week combined training on body
composition, isokinetic strength, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in
older women. Aging Clin Exp Res 2015; 27:179 –186.
Study comparing combined training with aerobic training in older women during 8
weeks. Combined training seems to improve body composition and muscle
strength slightly more than the aerobic training intervention. However, for the
inflammatory profile, no differences were found between both interventions.
26. Libardi CA, Chacon-Mikahil MP, Cavaglieri CR, et al. Effect of concurrent
training with blood flow restriction in the elderly. Int J Sports Med 2015;
36:395– 399.
27.
&&
Lima LG, Bonardi JM, Campos GO, et al. Effect of aerobic training and
aerobic and resistance training on the inflammatory status of hypertensive
older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2015; 27:483 –489.
Aerobic training and combined training improve the inflammatory profile of hy-
pertensive older adults. This study shows that an intensive exercise intervention is
feasible in this specific population and is beneficial for them.
28. Markovic G, Sarabon N, Greblo Z, Krizanic V. Effects of feedback-based
balance and core resistance training vs. Pilates training on balance and
muscle function in older women: a randomized-controlled trial. Arch Gerontol
Geriatr 2015; 61:117– 123.
29. Martins WR, Safons MP, Bottaro M, et al. Effects of short term elastic
resistance training on muscle mass and strength in untrained older adults:
a randomized clinical trial. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15:99.
30. Nicholson VP, McKean MR, Slater GJ, et al. Low-load very high-repetition
resistance training attenuates bone loss at the lumbar spine in active post-
menopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 2015; 96:490 –499.
31.
&
Nishida Y, Tanaka K, Hara M, et al. Effects of home-based bench step exercise
on inflammatory cytokines and lipid profiles in elderly Japanese females: a
randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2015; 61:443 – 451.
A study focusing on the inflammatory profile of older women after 12 weeks of
aerobic training. Only small effects on IFN- gwere found.
32.
&&
Padilha CS, Ribeiro AS, Fleck SJ, et al. Effect of resistance training with
different frequencies and detraining on muscular strength and oxidative stress
biomarkers in older women. Age (Dordr) 2015; 37:104.
Nonfrail older adults training two or three times in a week show significant
(medium-to-large effects) improvements in muscle strength. However, training
three times in a week at high intensity generates significantly better results.
33. Perchthaler D, Grau S, Hein T. Evaluation of a six-week whole-body vibration
intervention on neuromuscular performance in older adults. J Strength Cond
Res 2015; 29:86– 95.
34.
&&
Reid KF, Martin KI, Doros G, et al. Comparative effects of light or heavy
resistance power training for improving lower extremity power and physical
performance in mobility-limited older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2015; 70:374– 380.
Different intensities of resistance training in frail older adults increased muscle
strength and physical functioning. However, no difference was found between the
modalities.
35. Rossi FE, Fortaleza AC, Neves LM, et al. Combined training (aerobic plus
strength) potentiates a reduction in body fat but demonstrates no difference
on the lipid profile in postmenopausal women when compared with aerobic
training with a similar training load. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30:226 –234.
36. Ruiz JR, Gil-Bea F, Bustamante-Ara N, et al. Resistance training does not have
an effect on cognition or related serum biomarkers in nonagenarians: a
randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36:54 –60.
Ageing: biology and nutrition
52 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 20 Number 1 January 2017
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
37. Salhi B, Malfait TJ, Van Maele G, et al. Effects of whole body vibration in
patients with COPD. COPD 2015; 12:525–532.
38. Sitja
`-Rabert M, Martı
´nez-Zapata MJ, Fort Vanmeerhaeghe A, et al. Effects of a
whole body vibration (WBV) exercise intervention for institutionalized older
people: a randomized, multicentre, parallel, clinical trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc
2015; 16:125– 131.
39.
&
Strandberg E, Edholm P, Ponsot E, et al. Influence of combined resistance
training and healthy diet on muscle mass in healthy elderly women: a
randomized controlled trial. J Appl Physiol 2015; 119:918 – 925.
One of the only studies including all outcome parameters. However, only the
muscle strength increased after the high-intensity resistance training in older
women.
40.
&
Su Z, Zhao J, Wang N, et al. Effects of weighted tai chi on leg strength of older
adults. JAGS 2015; 63:2208– 2210.
Weighted tai chi showed increases in muscle strength compared with regular tai
chi suggesting that exercising with an additional external load can be beneficial for
improving muscle strength.
41.
&
Tieland M, Verdijk LB, de Groot LC, van Loon LJ. Handgrip strength does not
represent an appropriate measure to evaluate changes in muscle strength
during an exercise intervention program in frail older people. Int J Sport Nutr
Exerc Metab 2015; 25:27– 36.
Resistance training intervention increases physical functioning and muscle
strength compared with a control group. Large effects were obtained.
42. Tseng SY, Lai CL, Chang KL, et al. Influence of whole-body vibration training
without visual feedback on balance and lower-extremity muscle strength of the
elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e2709.
43.
&&
Villanueva MG, Lane CJ, Schroeder ET. Short rest interval lengths between
sets optimally enhance body composition and performance with 8 weeks of
strength resistance training in older men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115:295 –
308.
Comparing short (1 min) with long (4 min) rest interval between exercise sets in a
resistance training intervention. Training with short rest intervals shows better
results for body composition, muscle strength as well as for physical functioning.
Not much studies have investigated the influence of time of rest between exercise
sets. This study shows that more attention should be paid to rest interval and not
only at the external load during resistance training.
44.
&&
Winters-Stone KM, Dobek JC, Bennett JA, et al. Resistance training reduces
disability in prostate cancer survivors on androgen deprivation therapy:
evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;
96:7– 14.
Resistance training improves muscle strength in older adults with prostate cancer,
despite androgen deprivation therapy.
45.
&&
Yamada M, Nishiguchi S, Fukutani N, et al. Mail-based intervention for
sarcopenia prevention increased anabolic hormone and skeletal muscle mass
in community-dwelling Japanese older adults: the INE (Intervention by Nutri-
tion and Exercise) Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16:654 –660.
Investigated effects of aerobic training on body composition of frail and nonfrail
older adults. Aerobic training increased in nonfrail elderly as well as in frail older
adults. This suggests that aerobic training can also be beneficial in frail older
adults. More research should be performed in this specific population.
46. NICE. Methodology checklist: randomised controlled trials. 2012; Available
from: http://publications.nice.org.uk/the-guidelines-manual-appendices-bi-
pmg6b. [Accessed 3 June 2016]
47. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative
science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 2013;
4:863.
48. Li H, Manwani B, Leng SX. Frailty, Inflammation, and Immunity. Aging Dis
2011; 2:466– 473.
49. Aguirre LE, Villareal DT. Physical exercise as therapy for frailty. Nestle Nutr Inst
Workshop Ser 2015; 83:83– 92.
50. Santilli V, Bernetti A, Mangone M, Paoloni M. Clinical definition of sarcopenia.
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2014; 11:177–180.
51. de Vries NM, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JS, et al. Effects of physical
exercise therapy on mobility, physical functioning, physical activity and quality
of life in community-dwelling older adults with impaired mobility, physical
disability and/or multimorbidity: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2012;
11:136– 149.
52. Cesari M, Vellas B, Hsu FC, et al. A physical activity intervention to treat the
frailty syndrome in older persons – results from the LIFE-P study. J Gerontol A
Biol Sci Med Sci 2015; 70:216–222.
53. Pahor M, Guralnik JM, Ambrosius WT, et al. Effect of structured physical
activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adu lts: the LIFE study
randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311:2387–2396.
54.
&
Oliveira NL, Ribeiro F, Silva G, et al. Effect of exercise-based cardiac
rehabilitation on arterial stiffness and inflammatory and endothelial dysfunc-
tion biomarkers: a randomized controlled trial of myocardial infarction patients.
Atherosclerosis 2015; 239:150–157.
In patients after acute myocardial infarction, physical functioning improved,
although no changes in inflammation or body composition were observed.
55. Brandt C, Pedersen BK. The role of exercise-induced myokines in muscle
homeostasis and the defense against chronic diseases. J Biomed Biotechnol
2010; 2010:520258.
56. Hurley BF, Hanson ED, Sheaff AKK. Strength training as a countermeasure to
aging muscle and chronic disease. Sports Med 2011; 41:289 –306.
The effects of exercise in older adults: a systematic review Liberman et al.
1363-1950 Copyright ß2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 53