We focus on assessments in conversation, paying particular attention to a distinction between
object-side (O-side) and subject-side (S-side) assessments. O-side assessments are predicated
of an object (that it is good, awful, nice, bad, etc.), whereas S-side assessments formulate a
disposition of the speaker toward that object (that they like it, love it, hate it, cannot stand
it, etc.). Despite
... [Show full abstract] looking somewhat interchangeable, logically, these different ways of making
assessments serve different interactional functions. In particular, S-side assessments allow for
contrasting assessments of the same object by different persons. They are therefore useful in the
management and avoidance of conflict and misalignment in the performance of actions such as
compliment receipts, avoiding giving offense and disagreeing. We link the analysis to conversation
analytic work on assessments and to discursive psychology’s focus on the everyday management
of relations between mental states and an external world.