Content uploaded by Rock Britto
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Rock Britto on Jul 14, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
www.IndianJournals.com
Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale
Downloaded From IP - 118.102.208.156 on dated 3-Jan-2017
168
Alcohol Use and Mental Health among Migrant Workers
Rock B1, Catherin N2, Mathew T3, Navshin S3, Kurian H 3, Sherrin S3, Goud BR4, Shanbhag D5
1
Assistant Professor, Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Trichy,
1Assistant Professor, Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Trichy,
1
2
Surviellence Medical Officer, NPSP, WHO,
3
Medical Intern,
4Additional Professor, Community Medicine,
5Associate Professor, Community Medicine, Department of Community Health,
St John’s Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There are about 30 million migrant workers in India. Migrant workers contribute significantly
to the unorganised sector of occupation.The stressors associated with migrant’s lifestyle are language barriers,
unpredictable nature of housing or work, being away from friends and family, worries about socialisation and
education of their children. Migrants are more susceptible to mental health problems such as depression, anxiety
and substance abuse. Migrants may use increased alcohol and other drugs to offset the stressors of migrant life,
boredom, and feelings of depression and anxiety. Thus, mental health and alcohol use among migrants become
a vicious cycle. Need for the study: The Mental health status and alcohol use among migrant workers has been
studied the least. Objectives: This study assesses the alcohol abuse, mental health status and associated factors
among the internal migrant workers. Methodology: A cross sectional study was done among migrant workers
staying in villages under Bangalore urban District, Karnataka, India. A sample size of 210 was estimated and
the workers were selected from different work places like construction sites, quarries, rosegardens using non
probability convenient sampling. The study tool consisted of an interview schedule with socio-demographic
details and occupation. The mental health status was assessed using Modified MINI screen (Mini International
Neuropsychiatric Interview). Alcoholism was measured using FIGS (Family Interview for Genetic studies)
questionnaire. Chi square test and independent ‘t’test was used to analyse data as appropriate. Results: Among
the 210 study subjects, 183 (87%) were males and 27 (13%) were females with mean age of 28.31 with S.D. of
9.52 and majority 130 (62%) were working in construction sites. Among the migrant workers it was observed
that 40 (19%) were screened positive for mental health problems and 45 (21%) consumed alcohol. 4%, 2%,
1% of them were abusing, suffering from withdrawal, suffering from dependence of alcohol respectively.
MMS positivity was associated with alcohol withdrawal, alcohol abuse, gender (more in females), with place
of work (rose and brick factory), and health problems. Conclusion: Among the study subjects, 40 (19%) were
screened positive for mental health problems and 45 (21%) were currently consuming alcohol.
Keywords: Migrant health, mental health, Alcohol use, Alcohol abuse, Alcohol dependence
Address for correspondence:
Dr. D. Rock Britto,
Department of Community Health, St John’s Medical
College, Bangalore – 560034, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: rockbritto@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION AND NEED FOR THE
STUDY
There are an estimated one billion migrants in the
world today of whom 214 million international migrants
(country to country) and 740 million internal migrants
(within country). The collective health needs and
implications of this sizeable population are considerable.
Migration comprise a wide range of populations, such as
workers, refugees, students, undocumented migrants and
others, with each different health determinants, needs
and levels of vulnerability. Out of which, migration for
occupation is common in a globalized world defined
by profound disparities, skill shortages, demographic
imbalances, climate change as well as economic and
political crises, natural as well as man-made disasters,
and migration is omnipresent1. Migrant workers
contribute significantly to the informal or unorganised
DOI Number:
10.5958/0976-5506.2016.00212.6
www.IndianJournals.com
Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale
Downloaded From IP - 118.102.208.156 on dated 3-Jan-2017
170
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, October-December 2016, Vol. 7, No. 4
171
sector of occupation. As per the NSSO (National Sample
Survey Organization) report, 30 million workers in India
are migrant workers.2
The health of migrants and health associated with
migration are crucial public health challenges faced by
governments and societies1. The stressors associated with
migrant’s lifestyle are language barriers, unpredictable
nature of housing and work, being away from friends
and family, worries about socialisation and education
of their children etc. Migrants are more susceptible to
mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and
substance abuse. Migrants may use increased alcohol
and other drugs to offset the stressors of migrant life,
boredom, and feelings of depression and anxiety. Thus,
mental health and alcohol use among migrants become a
vicious cycle.3
The mental health status and alcohol abuse among
migrant workers has been studied the least. This study
focuses on the alcohol abuse and mental health status
among the internal migrants (from other states of India
to Karnataka) staying in villages under Bangalore urban
District, Karnataka who had migrated for occupation.
OBJECTIVES
1. To assess prevalence of alcohol abuse and to
assess the mental health status among the internal migrant
workers from other states to Bangalore urban District,
Karnataka, India
2. To assess the associated socio-demographic and
occupational factors with alcohol abuse and mental
health.
METHODOLOGY
A cross-sectional study was carried out during the
period of March to May of 2014, among the internal
migrant workers, working in Bangalore urban District,
Karnataka, India. We considered the person as migrant
worker if the person doesn’t possess the family card at the
residence and had migrated for occupation. Non-working
family members of migrant workers were excluded. 210
Migrants were included in the study, assuming maximum
prevalence of 50% (similar studies were not available in
the literature), with an absolute precision of 7% and 95%
confidence. Non – Probability convenience sampling
was followed. After establishing rapport with the study
subject, the purpose, procedure, benefits, risks and
confidentiality of the study were explained. Informed
written consent from the study subject was taken before
the questionnaire was administered.
A structured interview schedule was used to collect
relevant data from the respondents. The interview
schedule had four parts: Part 1 – Personal and socio
demographic details – consisting of age, gender,
marital status, religion, education, income, current
health problems and medications etc. Part 2 - Details
related to their occupation – consisting of questions
related to duration of work (hours per day, days per
week), type of employment, enrollment in any medical
schemes, pre placement examination, training, use of
PPEs and availability of first aid kit. Part 3 - Modified
MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview)
Screen MMS for assessment of mental health status
– consisting of questions related to mood disorders,
anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, obsessive
compulsive disorders andpost-traumatic stress disorders.
Score ≥10 is considered as treatment needed. Score ≥6,
≤9 is considered as assessment needed. Part 4 – FIGS
(Family Interview for Genetic studies) Questionnaire to
assess level of alcohol abuse – consisting of questions
related to any alcohol abuse, dependence and withdrawal.
The data was analysed using SPSS version 16 for
proportions, frequencies and associations. Frequencies,
measures of central tendency and dispersion, chi square
tests and independent ‘t’test was used to analyse data as
appropriate.
RESULTS
1. Socio-demographic details:
The details of education, place of work and the
state from migrated are represented in Table 1.The
mean age of the study population was 28.31 with S.D.
of 9.52. The minimum age of the study population was
14 and maximum was 59. Majority, 183 (87%) of the
study population were males. 127 (60%) of the study
population were married. 199 (95%) out of 210 were
following Hinduism.
www.IndianJournals.com
Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale
Downloaded From IP - 118.102.208.156 on dated 3-Jan-2017
170
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, October-December 2016, Vol. 7, No. 4
171
Table 1: Socio-demographic details of study population:
Sl. No.
Variable
Category
No
%
1
Migrated from
West Bengal
48
22.9
Andhra Pradesh
34
16.2
Orissa
21
10.0
Uttar Pradesh
19
9.1
Jharkhand
17
8.1
Bihar
16
7.6
Tamil Nadu
12
5.7
Assam
12
5.7
Others (Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Kerala, MP, Rajasthan,
Uttarkhand)
30
14.2
2
Education
(Highest education
attained)
Illiterate
35
16.7
Primary school
80
38.1
Middle school
41
19.5
High school
26
12.4
Higher secondary school
20
9.5
Graduate
8
3.8
3
Place of work
Construction
130
62
Brick Factory
31
15
Quarry
23
11
Rose Garden
17
8
Hatchery
9
4
2. Details related to their Occupation:
130 (62%) out of 210 migrant workers interviewed
were working in construction sites, followed by 31 (15%)
in brick factory.98 (47%) of the migrant workers were
working for all the seven days in a week. Only 20 (9.5%)
migrant workers out of 210 were working less than or
equal to eight hours a day. 34 (16%) of the migrant
workers were working in the study area for more than five
years. 40 (19%) of the migrant workers reported some
health problems. Out of the health problems reported
myalgia (37%) was the common, followed by allergic
dermatitis, stomach ache and head ache. 178 (85%) of
migrant workers in study were belonging to contract
type of workers. Only 5 (2.5%) of the study population
reported that they are eligible for medical benefits. Only
7 (3.3%) of the study population reported that they
received a training for their work. 75 (35.7%) of the study
population reported that they are using PPE’s. 55 (32.2%)
of the study population reported that the first aid kit was
available at their work place.
3. Alcohol abuse and Mental Health status:
The findings of FIGS Questionnairre are listed below
in Table 2:
Table 2: MMS screened positive, Alcohol abuse,
withdrawal, dependence among migrants:
Sl.
No.
FIGS/ MODIFIED
MINISCREEN
NUMBER
PERCEN-
TAGE
1.
ABUSE
8
4%
2.
WITHDRAWAL
5
2%
3.
DEPENDENCE
23
11%
4.
NEEDS
ASSESMENT
40
19%
5.
NEEDS
TREATMENT
2
0.9%
40 (19%) out of 210, scored than ≥6 in Modified Mini
Screen or screened positive and they need an assessment.
2 (0.9%) scored than ≥10 in Modified Mini Screen or
diagnosed positive and they need treatment.
The usage of tobacco in the form of smoke like
www.IndianJournals.com
Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale
Downloaded From IP - 118.102.208.156 on dated 3-Jan-2017
172
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, October-December 2016, Vol. 7, No. 4
173
cigarette, beedi etc., and smokeless form are 49 (23%)
and 50 (24%) repectively. While the prevalence of use
of alcohol among the study population was slightly
less compared to use of tobacco. ie., 45 (21%). None of
them reported any other substance use. We applied FIGS
pertained to use of alcohol.
4. Association between MMS positive and FIGS
results with socio demographic factors:
Independent ‘t’test was done, when categorical
variables ( MMS screened positive, alcohol abuse,
withdrawal, dependence) were associated with continous
variables (Age in years, Duration of stay, Total family
income, years of work, No of hours of work per day,
No of days of work per week). The ‘p’value was
significant between no. of hours of work with alcohol
abuse and dependence showing negative association.
The association between the gender and MMS Screened
positive is significantly more in females (p=0.017), more
in rose factory and brick factory (p=0.025), more in
tobacco users (p=0.012), persons with alcohol withdrawal
(p=0.049) and persons with alcohol abuse (p=0.045).
DISCUSSION
Community-based epidemiological studies conducted
in India on mental and behavioural disorders report
varying prevalence rates, ranging from 9.5 to 370 per
1000 population.4 Most Indian studies were focussing on
mental health of women, elderly, child and adolescents.
We could not find any article on mental health status
and alcohol use among migrants in India. Study among
Mexican-bornimmigrants in United Statesby Borges
et al, showed that, despite significant socioeconomic
disadvantages, migrants have better mental health
profiles than do U.S. – born Mexican Americans. They
showed half the mental morbidity of that of Mexican
Americans5.
This study also showed that MMS screened positive
was 18%, diagnosed positive was 0.9% which was
less than the prevalence among general population in
India.The decreased rates of psychopathology in migrant
workers may be related to difficult access to abuse
substances and a decreased frequency of alcohol abuse
among migrant workers. Even though they are exposed
to other risk factors like increased duration of work, high
risk behaviour, other stressors like being away from their
relatives etc., they are mentally healthy may be because,
only resilient healthy persons are migrating out of their
states for occupation. The other reason for less prevalence
of mental disorders in this study population is due to high
proportion of males in this study population (87%). But
that is the normal expected proportion of males among
migrants.
Despite ensuring the confidentiality about the
interview schedule and conducting the interview in
confidential settings, the study population was slightly
reluctant to reveal their problems related to their mental
health probably because of stigma attached. MMS was
used as study tool to assess the psychiatric morbidity
which has sensitivity of 70-96% and specificity of 81-
100% in Indian settings 6.
MMS screened positive was significantly more
among females which is because the psychiatric
morbidity is more in females (especially depression)
even in general female population. But the other reasons
for significant increase in psychiatric morbidity among
female population should be explored in detail in further
studies. The MMS positivity was significantly more
among persons using tobacco (p=0.012), persons with
alcohol withdrawal (p=0.049) and persons with alcohol
abuse (p=0.045).
CONCLUSION
Most of the migrant workers were from West Bengal
(22.8%) followed by Andhra Pradesh, Orissa,Jharkhand
and UP. Majority were contract workers (84.7%). 19.04 %
of the workers reported health problems. MMS screened
positive was found to be 18%, Diagnosed positive - 0.9%,
4%, 2% and 1% were abusing, suffering from withdrawal
and suffering from alcohol dependence respectively.
MMS positivity was associated with alcohol withdrawal,
alcohol abuse, gender (females), with place of work
(rose and brick factory), and health problems. Alcohol
withdrawal and dependence were associated with health
problems, alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse.
Ethical Clearance: Obtained from Institutional
Ethical committee, St.John’s Medical College. Bangalore-
34.
Acknowledgement: We thank all the study
participants. We thank the Faculty and Department of
Community Health for their inputs all along the study and
giving us this opportunity.
Funding: None
www.IndianJournals.com
Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale
Downloaded From IP - 118.102.208.156 on dated 3-Jan-2017
172
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, October-December 2016, Vol. 7, No. 4
173
Conflict of Interest: None
REFERENCES
1. WHO-Migrants Health. Available from http://
www.who.int/hac/techguidance/health_of_migrants/
en/
2. The Unorganised sector in India – Tomy Jacob,
Available from http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct
=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=
8&ved=0CCUQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffedina
.org%2F777%2F2011%2F10%2FUNORGANISED-
SECTOR-IN-INDIA1.doc&ei=meTsU_mVLsnc8A
XG6YAg&usg=AFQjCNFFMoS441-MJoHmpKWq
GDlb3P0foA&sig2=Xaix1YtkHwh0yoAIDFRdZA
3. Joseph D. Hovey – Monograph series on
Migrant mental health issue and substance abuse.
Available from http://www.ncfh.org/docs/04%20-
%20mental.pdf
4. Suresh BM and Srinivasaraju R, Indian Psychiatric
epidemiological studies: Learning from the past.
Indian J Psychiatry. Jan 2010; 52(Suppl1): S95–S103
Also available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pmc/articles/PMC3146182/
5. Borges G, Medina-Mora ME, Breslau J, Sergio
AG, The effect of migration to the united states on
substance use disorders among returned migrants
and families of migrants. American Journal of Public
Health. October 2007, Vol 97, No. 10. Also available
form http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
PMC1994169/
6. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH,
Amorin P, Janavs J, Weiller E et al. The Mini-
International Nueropsychiatric Interview (MINI):
The Development and validation of a structured
Diagnostic Psychiatric Interview for DSM-IV and
ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry.1998; 59(suppl 20): p 22-
33.