ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Bamboo is a strong, fast growing and very sustainable material, having been used structurally for thousands of years in many parts of the world. In modern times, it has the potential to be an aesthetically pleasing and low-cost alternative to more conventional materials, such as timber, as demonstrated by some visually impressive recent structures. This five-part technical series, aimed at both developed-and developing-world contexts, will bring together current knowledge and best practice on the structural use of bamboo, covering: • an introduction to bamboo (part 1) • durability and preservation (part 2) • design values (part 3) • element design equations (part 4) • connections (part 5) This second article presents the main causes of decay of bamboo and the different methods of protection and preservation available.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Technical Note Series: Structural Use of Bamboo
Technical Note 2: Durability and Preservation
Sebastian Kaminski, MEng (Hons) ACGI CEng MIStructE, Senior Structural Engineer at
Arup Advanced Technology & Research London
Andrew Lawrence, MA (Cantab) CEng MICE MIStructE, Associate Director at Arup
Advanced Technology & Research London
David Trujillo, MSc DIC CEng MIStructE, Senior Lecturer at Coventry University
Charlotte King, MA
(Cantab) CEng MIStructE, S
enior Structural Engineer at Arup Building
Engineering London
Synopsis
Bamboo is a strong, fast growing and sustainable material, having been used structurally for
thousands of years in many parts of the world. In modern times it has the potential to be an
aesthetically-pleasing and low-cost alternative to more conventional materials such as timber,
as demonstrated by some recent, visually impressive structures.
This Technical Note Series brings together current knowledge and best practice on the
structural use of bamboo, covering:
1. Introduction to bamboo
2. Durability and preservation
3. Design values
4. Element design equations
5. Connections
The series is aimed at both developed and developing world contexts. This second Technical
Note 2 presents the main causes of decay of bamboo and the different methods of protection
and preservation available.
Introduction
Bamboo is more susceptible to decay than timber, due to a lack of natural toxins
1
and its
typically thin walls, which means that a small amount of decay can have a significant
percentage change in capacity. There are three causes of decay:
1. Beetle attack
Certain beetles are attracted to the starch in bamboo and lay their eggs inside the culm, after
which the eggs hatch and the larvae eat along the culm and eventually through the culm walls
to escape, leaving small round or oval exit holes (about 1mm–6mm diameter). Powderpost
beetles (which leave 1mm–2mm exit holes) are the most common (Figure 1). The rate of
attack is fastest with fresh green bamboo (which is more susceptible), but even dry bamboo
can be attacked in warm humid climates where the equilibrium moisture content of the
bamboo outside (but under cover) will often be higher than in more temperate climates
2
.
Figure 1: Beetle damage in bamboo – exit holes are clearly visible
3
2. Termite attack
Termites are small ant-like insects which live in colonies and feed on plant material. They are
also attracted to the starch in bamboo but unlike beetle have enzymes which also enable them
to break down the cellulose. Because they live in large colonies they can cause rapid damage
(Figure 2 and 3). There are two generic types of termites: subterranean and drywood. The
former live in the (preferably damp) ground whereas the latter make their nests in the timber
itself. Subterranean termites are translucent so build tunnels or find hidden paths to avoid
sunlight
4
(Figure 4).
Figure 2: Severe termite damage in bamboo
3
Figure 3: Cross-section through termite-damaged bamboo
5
Figure 4: Subterranean termite shelter tube emerging from crack
3
3. Fungal attack (rot)
Rot is caused by a fungus. For the fungus to survive the bamboo needs to be relatively wet
with at least 20% moisture content, which essentially means the bamboo must be exposed to
rain or ground moisture
6
(Figure 5).
Figure 5: Fungal damage, splitting and bleaching of boron-treated bamboo exposed to
the sun and rain after around 10 years
3
Protection against decay
As with timber, the most effective ways to protect bamboo from decay are by drying before
use and by appropriate design and detailing (Figure 6):
a) The bamboo should be kept dry under a roof with a good overhang to protect against
wind-blown/driving rain. Water traps, particularly at the bases of columns, should be
avoided. This will prevent rot and also decrease the rate of beetle and termite attack.
Walls formed from bamboo should be protected with a waterproof layer. Bamboo
walls encased in only cement mortar, relatively common as a modern form of
“engineered” bamboo housing, have shown evidence of deterioration when they are
fully exposed to driving rain
7
(Figure 7). Single storey bamboo buildings are likely to
experience less rot damage than multiple storey buildings because less of the wall is
exposed to rain.
b) The bamboo should be separated from the ground with a good barrier, preferably a
concrete ground slab, thereby forcing the termites out into the open. This will make it
harder for subterranean termites to attack the bamboo. Maintenance will still be
required to remove any termite shelter tubes, which the termites build to protect
themselves against light. Never cast bamboo direct into concrete.
Figure 6: Recommendations for detailing bamboo structures to protect against rot and
insects (based on good practice timber detailing, Kaminski (2013)
7
and Trujillo et al.
(2013)
8
Figure 7: Cane and cement mortar wall, showing signs of significant rot damage to cane
due to rain
3
In colder climates, such as Europe, these measures will often be adequate, but in warmer
humid climates, where there is the risk of beetle and drywood termite attack, structural
bamboo must be preservative-treated if a reasonable design life is required – although this
will slightly increase the initial cost of the bamboo, the whole life cost of the structure will be
less. For non-structural members, decay of which will not pose a safety risk, it is possible to
leave them untreated and accept that the members will need to be regularly replaced.
However, they will lose their attractive appearance as they start to degrade, and beetles leave
significant amounts of dust from the exit holes, which can be a nuisance inside the building.
The length of time bamboo will last before it needs to be replaced will depend on the
environment in which it is used and the treatment type; Table 1 presents a guide for suggested
approximate timings in a warm aggressive environment and indicates clearly why bamboo
should preferably be only used in a dry internal environment, and also why it should be
treated. Note that the variation in time depends on the prevalence of termites nearby.
Table 1: Suggested approximate length of time before bamboo will need to be replaced
(assuming a warm aggressive environment with a risk of termite and beetle attack)
Untreated Treated with
boron
Treatment with fixed
preservatives *
Internal 2–6 years 30+ years 30+ years
External above ground 0.5–4 years 2–15 years 30+ years
External in ground
contact
<0.5 years < 1 year 15+ years
*Note: This is an inferred estimate based on a combination of limited testing conducted so far using fixed
preservatives in bamboo, and on evidence from stake tests of timber. It is not yet known whether severe
exposure to rain increases the likelihood of splitting, which would weaken the culm and its connections, and
allow further water ingress
9
Introduction to treatment options
When selecting a treatment type or chemical and application method, the following
considerations are important
2
:
quantity of bamboo to be treated
availability of treatment facilities
availability of chemicals
intended use of bamboo: inside or outside
country legislation
species: some species are more readily treatable than others
transport time from harvest location to treatment facility: some treatment methods
require very freshly cut bamboo
budget
effectiveness of treatment type or chemical and application method
whether the chemical affects the structure of the bamboo or any metal fastenings
toxicity of chemical to humans throughout whole life (treatment, use and disposal)
toxicity of chemical to environment throughout whole life (treatment, use and
disposal).
Traditional treatment options
Several traditional and simple treatment options commonly used in developing countries
exist
10
, including soaking for several weeks in water (which washes out some of the starch),
smoking (which provides a light protective layer and partially heat treats the surface) and
painting (which provides some protection against water). Unfortunately these all have limited
effect and hence are not normally recommended for permanent structural bamboo – they may
be appropriate only for marginally prolonging the life of non-structural bamboo or in
temporary shelters. Painting or varnishing for example firstly does not adhere well to bamboo
due to its smooth silica outer skin, secondly tends to break down rapidly under UV light, and
thirdly as the bamboo changes size under different moisture conditions the paint will crack
and allow water in. There also exist other traditional treatment methods using naturally-found
chemicals, however these are also not recommended as their effectiveness is limited and
some may be harmful to humans.
Preservative treatment options
Preservatives are essentially toxins which are added to the bamboo to deter fungal and insect
attack. Although numerous types of treatment are available, many have limited effectiveness
or are unsuitable because they pose major health and safety risks (such as: older copper-based
preservatives including copper-chrome-arsenic (CCA) and ammoniacal-copper-arsenate
(ACA), and other chemicals such as creosote and chlorpyrifos). This leaves just two basic
types of preservative that are widely considered to be by far the most appropriate for bamboo:
1. Boron: cheap to apply, effective, but soluble, so elements treated with boron cannot
be used externally.
2. Modern copper-based wood preservatives: expensive to apply, effective, but
reasonably well fixed against leaching, so can be used externally.
Treatment using boron
In nearly all cases, boron is by far the most appropriate chemical with which to treat
bamboo
10
and has a good track record
7
. Boron has insecticidal (poisonous to insects) and
fungicidal properties. It generally has a low mammalian toxicity, although in higher
concentrations can irritate the skin and eyes, and if ingested is moderately toxic
11,12
. Boron-
treated bamboo is safe to touch, however there are differing views on whether it is hazardous
when burnt (data sheets say as a general rule that boron-treated timber/bamboo should not be
burnt, but some research has suggested that the risks may be much lower than this). Boron
treatment is also relatively low-cost.
Boron is normally used in compound form, typically as a salt. These compounds are readily
available in most countries as relatively cheap fertilisers that just need to be added to water.
The mixture is sometimes also heated to assist in the treatment process. In all treatment
methods the boron solution can be reused multiple times (but not indefinitely), and any
residual solution can be safely diluted down and used as a fertiliser. The most commonly
used boron-containing compound is disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (Na
2
B
8
O
13
.4H
2
0) (trade
names Tim-bor or Solubor).
Although significant research has been conducted to see whether a boron-containing
compound can be fixed into bamboo/timber
2
, so far there has been no success and hence all
boron-containing compounds will eventually have their boron leached out when exposed to
rain.
While there are many different ways of treating with boron (as discussed further on), in
practice only the modified Boucherie method avoids the need to rupture the diaphragms.
Maintaining a solid diaphragm is beneficial as it: (a) improves the ability to reliably infill the
internode with grout/mortar/ epoxy (which is typically essential for good structural
connections; this will be discussed in more detail in the fourth article in the series), and (b)
may also play an important role in controlling splitting and buckling of the culm wall. Where
other methods are used, consider the impact of poorer grout/mortar/epoxy compaction in the
internode.
Bath/soaking
This method involves soaking the bamboo in a bath of the chemical
10
(Figure 8). Split
bamboo may require only a week, whereas round culms need 10–14 days. The nodal
diaphragm needs to be punctured to allow the chemical to access the inside of the internodes;
the chemical can be heated to speed up the process. This requires fresh or almost fresh culms
(up to seven days since harvesting) otherwise the cell walls will start to close. Bamboo should
be stored upright for a minimum of one week after treatment to allow the boron to diffuse
throughout the culm, followed by a further period of one to two weeks to partly season the
bamboo. The bath liquid can be reused multiple times. Bath treatment is the cheapest and
simplest of the boron treatment methods, but it takes the most time.
Figure 8: Bath method with boron, Colombia
3
Vertical soak diffusion
This method involves placing the bamboo culms upright and pouring chemicals into them
from the top
10
(Figure 9). Holes will need to be punched through all but the last of the nodes.
The culms are then left for 10–14 days while the solution diffuses through the bamboo walls
outwards; the solution should be topped up periodically. Finally the base nodes are punctured
and the chemical drained out. A dye can be added to the chemical which will show on the
outside of the culm when diffusion is complete. This method requires fresh or almost fresh
culms (less than seven days since harvesting) otherwise the cell walls will start to close. The
chemical can be reused several times. Vertical soak diffusion is cheap and is commonly done
in Indonesia.
Figure 9: Vertical soak diffusion treatment tower
13
Modified boucherie method
This is a sap-displacement/replacement method whereby the treatment chemical is pushed
through the bamboo under pressure, replacing the sap
10
(Figure 10). It is therefore one of the
fastest methods, taking as little as 30 minutes per culm (including setting-up time). The
equipment needed can generally be sourced locally, however experience is normally
necessary to ensure the process is effective. The chemical can be reused several times.
To be effective the bamboo will need to be treated within 12 hours of being cut, otherwise the
cell walls start to close. If this is not possible the bamboo should be kept in a tank of water to
keep it moist. During transportation, the ends of the culms should be covered with a damp
cloth, and immediately before treatment these should be trimmed off to remove any length
that has begun to dry. This method is used extensively in Costa Rica and Nepal. It is one of
the fastest and most-effective treatment methods; however, the required freshness of the
culms and the technology required are drawbacks.
Figure 10: Modified Boucherie treatment equipment, Costa Rica
3
Treatment using modern copper-based preservatives
Modern forms of copper-based preservatives are significantly less toxic to humans than older
forms because they no longer use arsenic and chromium, and instead contain a mixture of
copper, biocides and sometimes boric acid. They are very effective against fungi, termites
and beetles, and are chemically relatively well-fixed into the bamboo (with the exception of
any boric acid component), hence can be used externally and in contact with the ground.
Copper-based preservatives are somewhat corrosive to steel, hence galvanised or even
stainless steel fixings may need to be considered. The corrosive potential will depend on the
percentage retention of the active chemical. The recommended forms of modern copper-
based preservatives that could be used for bamboo are copper azole type B and C (CA-B and
CA-C), because they do not contain boron (which will leach out over time) and are less
corrosive to steel than other forms. These copper-based preservatives are safe in use as the
toxic chemical is fixed into the bamboo, however the treated bamboo should not be burnt at
end of life because this may release hazardous chemicals.
In general copper-based preservative treatments are significantly more expensive than boron-
based treatments because they all require semi-industrial pressure treatment and also because
the bamboo must be fully kiln-dried before treatment. After treating, the bamboo needs to be
re-dried by kiln drying or natural drying.
It is important to note that limited work and testing has been conducted on the use of copper-
based preservatives for treatment of bamboo, however indications so far suggest that it could
be very successful
14
. Testing would need to be conducted to determine the required
percentage retention of the active chemical to be effective and exactly what pressure
treatment process would be suitable for this.
Seasoning
Seasoning (drying) of bamboo is important in order to carefully bring down its moisture
content to levels closer to the equilibrium moisture content in service. Seasoning improves
bamboo’s resistance to fungi and insect attack and is especially important before transporting.
It also limits the amount of drying shrinkage in service which would otherwise affect the
connections, and as a general rule it is better to work with dry bamboo.
Seasoning should be done slowly enough for the bamboo to shrink uniformly, otherwise
cracks and splits can occur. Seasoning of large-diameter culms by just storing takes a long
time (several months) (Figure 11), so often solar or heated kilns are used to speed up the
process.
Figure 11: Seasoning of bamboo in Colombia
15
Summary
Bamboo is a particularly vulnerable natural building material and, without proper
consideration of insect attack or rot, can deteriorate very rapidly. To protect against insects,
in nearly all scenarios boron should be regarded as the treatment chemical of choice due to its
efficacy, low-cost, low mammalian toxicity and ease of use. There also exist a number of
simple and effective methods to apply boron. However, because of its high solubility in
water, it can be easily washed out, and hence must be used in areas protected from rain. To
protect against rot, good practice detailing (durability by design) should be used, by
protecting the bamboo from rain and water by keeping it indoors, elevated and covered.
When these measures are successfully combined, bamboo can have a lifespan of 30+ years.
As a possible alternative to boron, copper-based chemically-fixed preservatives have shown
some promise, and in theory these would allow bamboo to be used externally, however
further research in this field is still required.
The next article in the series will cover design values for using bamboo structurally.
References
1. Janssen, J. (2000) Technical Report 20: Designing and Building with Bamboo.
Beijing, INBAR
2. Liese, W., Gutiérrez, J., González, G. (2002) Preservation of bamboo for the
construction of houses for low income people. Bamboo for Sustainable Development,
pp.481-494.
3. Kaminski, S. (2011-2015) Personal photo collection
4. BRE (1999) Termites and UK Buildings: Biology, detection and diagnosis – Digest
443 Part 1. Bracknell, UK, BRE
5. Trujillo, D. (2014) Personal photo collection
6. Ridout, B. (1999) Timber Decay in Buildings: The Conservation Approach to
Treatment: (Guides for Practitioners). UK, Historic Scotland
7. Kaminski, S. (2013) Engineered Bamboo Houses for Low-Income Communities in
Latin America. The Structural Engineer, October 2013, pp.14-23
8. Trujillo, D., Ramage, M., Chang, W. (2013) Lightly modified bamboo for structural
applications. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers – Construction Materials,
166(4), pp. 238–247
9. Lebow, S. (2004) Alternatives to chromated copper arsenate for residential
construction. Research Paper FPL-RP-618. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory
10. Liese, W., Kumar, S. (2003) INBAR Technical Report 22: Bamboo Preservation
Compendium. Beijing, INBAR
11. System Three (2013) Material Safety Data Sheet: Board Defence. [Online] Available
from: https://www.systemthree.com/reslibrary/msds/Board_Defense_MSDS.pdf
(Accessed November 2014)
12. Green Building Press (n.d.) Boron, our Health and the Environment. [Online]
Available from: http://www.greenbuildingpress.co.uk/archive/Boron.php (Accessed
November 2014)
13. Environmental Bamboo Foundation (2003) Vertical soak diffusion for bamboo
preservation. [Online] Available from: http://www.bamboocentral.org (Accessed
November 2014)
14. Ya-mei, W., Xi-ming, W., Jun-liang, L. (2011) Decay and leach resistances of
bamboo treated with CuAz preservatives. 2011 International Conference on
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering: Advances in Biomedical Engineering.
Vols. 1-2. pp. 338-341
15. Ramage, M. (2012) Personal photo collection
... Bamboo with high fiber content is the fastest growing woody plants in the world, which reaches maturity in 3-5 years (Sun et al. 2012;Li et al. 2017;Ju et al. 2021). However, the products of bamboo are susceptible to environmental degradations such as ultraviolet (UV) rays (Baysal et al. 2016;Topaloglu 2019), mould (Sun et al. 2011(Sun et al. , 2012Li et al. 2017) and decay fungi, and insect attacks (Schmidt et al. 2011Wei 2014;Kaminski et al. 2016;Tang and Trinh 2019;Gauss et al. 2021a) during storage, transport and final utilization areas . Those factors shorten service life of the bamboo products, and reduce its value in market, and lead wastage of bamboo resources (Sun et al. 2011(Sun et al. , 2012Li et al. 2017). ...
... Certain beetles are attracted by the starch in bamboos, and the larvae fed along the culm. Termites and fungi are also attracted by the starch in bamboos, and break down the cellulose by enzymes (Kaminski et al. 2016). Bamboos have lower durability compared with wood (Liese 1980). ...
... Several traditional and simple treatment options such as soaking for several weeks in water (which leaches out some of the starch), smoking (which provides a light protective layer) and surface coating (which provides some protection against water) are used. Unfortunately, all these methods have limited effect to ensure durability (Kaminski et al. 2016). Various bamboo treatments such as chemical and natural preservatives, heat, and oleo-thermal treatments have been demonstrated in both academic and industrial levels Gauss et al. 2021b). ...
Article
Full-text available
In this study, durability of bamboo samples in terms of the variability of location along culm height (top, middle and bottom) were evaluated in a ground-contact field test for six years in comparison to Scots pine and beech wood samples. Bamboo and wood samples were treated with Wolmanit-CB (CCB) and Tanalith-E (Tan-E) solutions, and then were installed in a field located in the North-West of Turkey. The decay resistance of samples was assessed by weight loss, and compared by SEM observations and FTIR analysis. Furthermore, chemical leaching from the samples was detected by ICP-OES after the test. Results showed that un-treated bamboo and wood samples had a very low durability such that weight losses were found as 64–80% for bamboo and 57–63% for wood samples. The SEM micrographs showed the characteristics decay patterns of soft-rot type I and brown-rot fungi in the parenchyma cells, vessels and fibers in vascular bundles. Fungal hyphae within the cell walls resulted in the gradual breakdown of the cell wall layers. FTIR analysis revealed the mechanism of the biodegradation, which indicates the reduction of carbohydrate content. The weight loss in CCB and Tan-E treated bamboo samples was reduced as 20–45% depending on bamboo height parts, but the wood preservatives did not ensure sufficient resistance for six years against soil degrading organisms since more than half of the chemical amount leached out from the bamboos to soil. Weight losses were well confirmed by chemical leaching rates for both CCB and Tan-E. It was observed that the lower parts of the culm were more durable, which was also in accordance with ICP-OES and SEM analysis. Copper-based preservatives seemed to be more efficient in pine and beech wood samples than bamboos since the impregnability of bamboo was much lower than that of wood. Graphical abstract
... Otra ventaja es que son de fácil acceso para la mayoría de los productores. En casi todos los casos el boro es el químico más apropiado para tratar el bambú, ya que este tiene propiedades insecticidas y fungicidas, su efectividad es tan elevada que en todos los métodos de preservación la solución puede reutilizarse varias veces y cualquier solución residual puede ser diluida en agua y utilizarse como fertilizante en plantaciones (Kaminski et al., 2016). Hay que resaltar que la preservación de este material no solo tiene que ver con la utilización de las sustancias preservantes, se basa en una serie de procesos con características específicas y conocimientos ancestrales como: el proceso de selección de la guadua dentro del guadual para ofrecer un producto que satisfaga el mercado (Méndez & Palominos, 2005); luego, el corte en secciones transversales establecidas según la demanda de los clientes, este corte se lo realiza en luna menguante para que desciendan los líquidos presentes en sus cavidades por la disminución de la gravedad (Cely et al, 2012); posteriormente se realiza el secado para reducir el contenido de humedad y mejorar su resistencia al ataque de hongos e insectos que por lo general atacan desde el momento del corte. ...
... Hay que resaltar que la preservación de este material no solo tiene que ver con la utilización de las sustancias preservantes, se basa en una serie de procesos con características específicas y conocimientos ancestrales como: el proceso de selección de la guadua dentro del guadual para ofrecer un producto que satisfaga el mercado (Méndez & Palominos, 2005); luego, el corte en secciones transversales establecidas según la demanda de los clientes, este corte se lo realiza en luna menguante para que desciendan los líquidos presentes en sus cavidades por la disminución de la gravedad (Cely et al, 2012); posteriormente se realiza el secado para reducir el contenido de humedad y mejorar su resistencia al ataque de hongos e insectos que por lo general atacan desde el momento del corte. El secado puede ser al aire libre o al horno teniendo en cuenta que debe ser lo más lento posible para que el bambú se encoja uniformemente (Kaminski et al., 2016). Finalmente, la preservación de las secciones que son sometidas al tratamiento por inmersión con los agentes y preservantes químicos como: hidróxidos, sulfatos, cloruros, alcoholes, ácidos, extractos botánicos entre otros, estos se emplean a diferentes concentraciones de acuerdo con los parámetros deseados y la variedad de bambú tratada (Kaur et al, 2016;Sulaeman et al., 2018). ...
... La (Tabla 4) resume los datos obtenidos del proceso de secado: En el primer secado, el 100% de las probetas cambiaron su color de verde a amarillo opaco, y a su vez el 33% sufrieron daños en su estructura física evidenciando un ligero agrietamiento a partir del primer turno de secado, coincidiendo con lo descrito por Mendez & Palominos (2005) quienes indican que una ventaja del proceso de secado al horno es la velocidad del secado y la desventaja es la posibilidad que agrietamiento y deformación de los culmos. Varios investigadores recomiendan realizar el secado del bambú lo más lento posible para que no se produzcan grietas y rajaduras (Kaminski et al., 2016). ...
Article
La caña Guadua angustifolia Kunth es un material con un gran potencial de industrialización que no ha sido objeto de estudio en el ámbito de la preservación por lo que se carece de una guía técnica sobre este procedimiento. El objetivo de esta investigación fue cuantificar niveles de impregnación del preservante elaborado con sales de boro aplicado por el método de inmersión en caña Guadua angustifolia Kunth. Para ello se utilizaron probetas de caña fresca en etapa madura que fueron secadas al horno y sumergidas durante diferentes períodos de tiempo de preservación en una solución de bórax y ácido bórico al 4%. Para al análisis cualitativo, las probetas se cortaron a la mitad transversalmente y los segmentos se expusieron a sustancias reveladoras elaboradas a partir de Cúrcuma longa y ácido clorhídrico. Adicionalmente, la dimensión de la coloración obtenida tras esta reacción química fue evaluada a través del análisis cuantitativo mediante el uso de fórmulas. Los principales resultados demostraron que para obtener niveles de absorción superiores a los 200 kg/m3 es necesario que las muestras se encuentren con un contenido de humedad inferior al 15% previo a la preservación; además, se estableció que un tiempo de inmersión de al menos 72 horas garantiza alcanzar un nivel tóxico de retención efectiva de 0,40 a 0,50 kg/m3 de producto activo.
... Certain beetles are attracted by the starch in bamboos, and the larvae fed along the culm. Termites and fungi are also attracted by the starch in bamboos, and break down the cellulose by enzymes (Kaminski et al. 2016). Bamboos have lower durability compared with wood (Liese 1980). ...
... Higher uptakes were recorded for wood samples in comparison to bamboos such that S. pine had the highest uptake values. Weight loss of bamboo and wood samples during eld test Figure 1 shows the weight loss of samples during the six years of eld conditions including the combined effect of sun, rain, snow, weathering, and microbial and insect attack etc. Bamboos were more susceptible to decay than wood in accordance with a previous study (Kaminski et al. 2016 Obviously, wood samples had greater decay resistance than bamboo samples. Lower decay rate in wood samples might be probably related to higher uptake of the preservatives in wood in comparison to that of bamboos. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In this study, durability of bamboo samples in terms of the variability of location along culm height (top, middle and bottom) were evaluated in a ground-contact field test for six years in comparison to Scots pine and beech wood samples. Bamboo and wood samples were treated with Wolmanit-CB (CCB) and Tanalith-E (Tan-E) solutions, and then were installed in a field located in the North-West of Turkey. The decay resistance of samples was assessed by weight loss, and compared by SEM observations and FTIR analysis. Furthermore, chemical leaching from the samples was detected by ICP-OES after the test. Results showed that un-treated bamboo and wood samples had a very low durability. The SEM micrographs showed the characteristics decay patterns of soft-rot type I and brown-rot fungi in the parenchyma cells, vessels and fibers in vascular bundles. Fungal hyphae within the cell walls resulted in the gradual breakdown of the cell wall layers. FTIR analysis revealed the mechanism of the biodegradation, which indicates the reduction of carbohydrate content. The weight loss in bamboo samples was reduced when they were treated by CCB and Tan-E, but the wood preservatives did not ensure sufficient resistance for six years against soil degrading organisms since a great amount of chemical leached out from the bamboos to soil. Weight losses were well confirmed by chemical leaching rates for both CCB and Tan-E. It was observed that the lower parts of the culm were more durable, which was also in accordance with ICP-OES and SEM analysis. Copper-based preservatives seemed to be more efficient in pine and beech wood samples than bamboos since the impregnability of bamboo was much lower than that of wood.
... where T u is the ultimate tension strength per unit width of reinforcement (kN/m) and R t is the reduction factor regarding tensile strength degradation. In the design of MSE wall using geosynthetic, R t includes three main factors, namely, creep, durability, and installation damage [18], [20]. To simplify, R was introduced as factor of effective tensile capacity which is the inversed reduction factor for tensile strength degradation (1/R t ). ...
Article
Railway is a main transportation to sustain the fast-growing population and economy in many countries. Developing railway infrastructures, such as additional tracks, without disturbing daily operations often requires temporary mechanically stabilized earth as embankment construction. This paper discussed woven bamboo mat (WBM) as a highly potential local material that can be used in mechanically stabilized earth construction in such condition. Considering that WBM has a wide variation in tensile strength, this study determined the reliable railway embankment height through reliability-based analysis. First-order reliability method (FORM) was adopted to estimate the probability of failure (pF). The results of FORM were compared with the results of Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The results showed positive trends in pF against increasing height, and the effective tensile capacity factor R negatively affected pF. The theoretically undegradable tensile strength in the design (R = 1.00) could increase the reliable height up to 12 m when sv = 0.2 m. Comparison between the FORM and MCS results showed that the pF calculated by FORM conformed with those computed by MCS. This study provided some insights and opened the opportunity for further research on other potential local materials as geomechanics reinforcement.
... However, unlike wood, bamboo is more susceptible to degradation due to its high content of starch, sugar and protein and low content of resin, wax, and tannin (Gauss et al., 2021). The biotic agents causing decay include beetles, termites and fungi (Kaminski et al., 2016a). Bamboo is also vulnerable to abiotic degradation, and cracks and splits in bamboo culms are very common. ...
Article
The mechanical properties of bamboo are susceptible to degradation due to both physical and biological agents. Among the non-chemical treatments, we studied the influence of a short-time heat treatment, using an LPG-gas torch, on the mechanical properties of a bamboo (Phyllostachys viridiglaucescens) growing in Italy. The response was very encouraging as we found no significant reduction in either elastic modulus or tensile, compressive and bending strength. Several samples were subject to tension, compression and bending tests to compare the responses of the treated and untreated culms. The average tensile elastic modulus was slightly greater for the untreated culms. The average tensile strength of the untreated culms was only slightly greater, and the differences can be assumed to be insignificant from a structural point of view. The average value of the treated culms compressive elastic modulus was slightly greater than that of the untreated ones. The compressive strength was essentially the same. The bending mechanical behaviour was barely influenced by the thermal treatment. A microscopic investigation (optical and electron microscopy) was undertaken to investigate the possible deterioration of the bamboo microstructure due to the heat treatment. No appreciable damage was detectable in the treated material. The proposed heat treatments can be considered as a reliable and sustainable protection practice for bamboo culms.
... In collaboration with the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE), Kaminski et al. [4][5][6][7] published a five-part technical series on bamboo as a structural material. The series aimed to provide guidelines for the safe design of bamboo structures by collating current knowledge and best practice, based on existing published bamboo and timber design codes. ...
Article
Full-text available
We describe literature-based research on the viability of whole-culm bamboo as a construction technology for South Africa. South Africa has one bamboo species considered suitable for construction, namely Bambusa balcooa, found in various parts of the country. Quantitative production figures are not currently available; however, local reports indicate that South Africa can expand its bamboo growth industry to meet any possible expected demand. Although the South African bamboo plant has not yet been evaluated in terms of its material properties, engineering design approaches and material properties from the literature indicate that this species is a viable construction material. The limitations for bamboo design and construction are not unique to South Africa but are common to countries involved in bamboo construction. Their experience in overcoming these limitations can be transferred to the use of bamboo in South Africa, making bamboo construction a potentially viable construction technology in South Africa. Significance: • Whole-culm bamboo can be used as a structural material in buildings and other specialised structures such as bridges, assembly halls, and the like. • South Africa has a bamboo species that should potentially be suitable for the construction of structures that lend themselves to this type of construction. • The information given here should allow designers, engineers and technologists to assess the viability of bamboo construction in South African situations.
... Boron and copper chrome boron (CCB) are the most commonly used (Abdul Karim et al. 2020). Furthermore, these preservatives have been widely used by the bamboo industries in Asia and other bamboo regions for a variety of product applications, including structural purposes (Liese and Tang 2015;Kaminski et al. 2016;Jivkov et al. 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Using a vacuum pressure cylinder, Gigantochloa scortechinii was treated with boron and copper chrome boron (CCB) preservative at different concentrations of 2% and 3%. The treatability of untreated and treated bamboo, as well as its physical and mechanical properties, were investigated. Both preservatives showed a high level of penetration into the bamboo strips. Weight percent gain (WPG) and extent of retention of CCB-treated bamboo strips were higher than those of the boron-treated samples. Swelling and shrinkage were proportionately reduced with treatment, with a significant difference between radial and tangential dimensions. When compared to untreated bamboo, treated bamboo showed a greater reduction in radial swelling but a lower reduction in shrinkage. The mechanical properties of untreated and treated samples differed in modulus of elasticity (MOE) and compression. Untreated samples had the highest MOE of 26,100 N.mm-2 , while boron and CCB had MOE values of 22,800 and 22,900 N.mm-2 , respectively. Copper chrome boron samples had the highest compression value of 86.3 N.mm-2 , while the boron and untreated samples had values of 84.0 and 78.3 N.mm-2 , respectively.
... Similarly, the relative poor durability of bamboo is emphasised [1]: 4. The high pH of concrete pore water may degrade lignincellulosic materials [7]. 5. Bamboo reinforcement embedded in concrete remains susceptible to biological attack and decay and therefore continues to require chemical treatment [8]. 6. Water absorption and hygrothermal cycling result in continuous volumetric change of the embedded bamboo reinforcing leading to interfacial damage and micro-and macro-cracking [9]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Bamboo-reinforced concrete is an ill-advised concept. Despite this, many researchers continue to investigate the replacement of steel with bamboo as reinforcement in concrete flexural members. This study provides a side-by-side comparison of the flexural behaviour of plain unreinforced concrete, steel reinforced concrete and two variations of bamboo-reinforced concrete comparable to the steel reinforced beam tested. As expected, the bamboo-reinforced concrete performs marginally better than unreinforced concrete but is entirely unable to approach the performance of under-reinforced steel-reinforced concrete. This paper underscores the fact that bamboo-reinforced concrete is not only ill-advised, but may indeed be structurally dangerous. KEYWORDS bamboo reinforced concrete; flexure; structural safety INTRODUCTION The use of small diameter whole-culm (poles) and/or split bamboo (splints or strips) is often proposed as an alternative to reinforcing steel in reinforced concrete. The motivation for such replacement is typically cost and the drive to find more sustainable alternatives in the construction industry.
Article
Full-text available
En este estudio experimental, se analiza el deterioro de la guadua frente a la exposición directa a agentes atmosféricos, (radiación solar, lluvia, viento y cambios de temperatura ambiente) para evaluar el comportamiento de tratamientos de protección, mediante un análisis comparativo de elementos expuestos protegidos y sin protección en idénticas condiciones. Se desarrolló una estructura en guadua angustifolia kunth en la cual se incluyeron diferentes ángulos en los elementos y sobre algunos de estos se aplicó una película protectora de lasur con varias preparaciones previas de la superficie. Se expuso el ensayo a la intemperie durante 11 meses, durante los cuales se realizó seguimiento al deterioro de la estructura mediante la inspección visual y documentación fotográfica en forma periódica. Posteriormente, se tomaron muestras de los elementos expuestos para ser analizados bajo microscopio de barrido electrónico. Se pudo identificar como lesión primaria la foto-degradación, evidente en los elementos con y sin protección, presentando más impacto en los elementos horizontales, que reciben mayor radiación solar. Derivadas de la foto-degradación, se encontraron otras lesiones secundarias, como la presencia de fisuras y grietas, las cuales comprometen la superficie del material y permiten la aparición de agentes bióticos en las guaduas. Las superficies no expuestas directamente a la radiación solar no presentaron afectaciones significativas, por lo que se concluyó que el principal aspecto frente al que se debe proteger la guadua es la radiación solar directa y que los procedimientos de protección aplicados no ofrecen un buen desempeño real frente a las condiciones del ensayo, planteando la necesidad de buscar alternativas eficientes frente a esta condición.
Article
The technique of using small diameter whole-culm and split bamboo has been often suggested as an alternative method for concrete strengthening. Bamboo is widely available in tropical and sub-tropical locations, while the quest for a new sustainable alternative is a new and recent trend in the construction industry. Using bamboo in reinforced concrete is discussed in this paper and it is analysed as a structural and environmental alternative to steel reinforced concrete. Reinforced concrete is widely used in many countries where bamboo reinforced concrete might be used as a design alternative to determine the life cycle of reinforced concrete. However, bamboo was extraordinary material. Therefore, it is used in reinforced concrete due to significant durability and reduced stiffness problem, which positively impacts the environment. Hence, this paper discusses a review on the structural performance of bamboo reinforced concrete based on previous research.
Article
Full-text available
Bamboo has been used for thousands of years for housing in many areas of the world because of its strength, availability, fast growth and low cost. However, durability has demoted its modern position to a poor man’s building material. This paper looks at engineered bamboo houses that have become popular in Latin America, and assesses them for their suitability for low-cost housing. Three highly seismic countries in Latin America – Costa Rica, Colombia and Ecuador – were visited and modern engineered bamboo low-cost housing projects reviewed. Visual inspections and interviews were conducted to determine the condition of the houses and the attitudes of their occupants. This paper suggests that well engineered bamboo designs have significant potential as a cheap, sustainable, durable, seismically-resistant and appropriate form of low-cost housing. However, good design and detailing is essential, especially with respect to durability, maintenance and seismic resistance.
Article
For decades chromated copper arsenate (CCA) was the primary preservative for treated wood used in residential construction. However, recent label changes submitted by CCA registrants will withdraw CCA from most residential applications. This action has increased interest in arsenic-free preservative systems that have been standardized by the American Wood Preservers' Association. These include acid copper chromate (ACC), alkaline copper quat (ACQ), cop-per azole (CBA-A and CA-B), copper citrate (CC), copper dimethyldithio-carbamate (CDDC), and copper HDO (CX-A). All of these CCA alternatives rely on copper as their primary biocide, although some have co-biocides to help prevent attack by copper-tolerant fungi. These alterna-tive treatments have appearance and handling properties similar to those of CCA and are likely to be readily accepted by consumers. Prior studies indicate that these treatments release preservative components into the environment at a rate greater than or equal to that of CCA, but because their components have lower mammalian toxicity they are less likely to cause concern in residential applications. As the treated wood industry evolves, it is probable that a wider range of types and retentions of wood preservatives will become available, with the treatment more closely tailored to a specific type of construction application. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimina-tion in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Wash-ington, DC 20250–9410, or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Preservation of bamboo for the construction of houses for low income people. Bamboo for Sustainable Development
  • W Liese
  • J Gutiérrez
  • G González
Liese, W., Gutiérrez, J., González, G. (2002) Preservation of bamboo for the construction of houses for low income people. Bamboo for Sustainable Development, pp.481-494.
Termites and UK Buildings: Biology, detection and diagnosis -Digest 443 Part 1
BRE (1999) Termites and UK Buildings: Biology, detection and diagnosis -Digest 443 Part 1. Bracknell, UK, BRE
Personal photo collection
  • D Trujillo
Trujillo, D. (2014) Personal photo collection
Lightly modified bamboo for structural applications
  • D Trujillo
  • M Ramage
  • W Chang
Trujillo, D., Ramage, M., Chang, W. (2013) Lightly modified bamboo for structural applications. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers -Construction Materials, 166(4), pp. 238-247
Material Safety Data Sheet: Board Defence
  • System Three
System Three (2013) Material Safety Data Sheet: Board Defence. [Online] Available from: https://www.systemthree.com/reslibrary/msds/Board_Defense_MSDS.pdf (Accessed November 2014)
Decay and leach resistances of bamboo treated with CuAz preservatives
  • W Ya-Mei
  • W Xi-Ming
  • L Jun-Liang
Ya-mei, W., Xi-ming, W., Jun-liang, L. (2011) Decay and leach resistances of bamboo treated with CuAz preservatives. 2011 International Conference on Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering: Advances in Biomedical Engineering. Vols. 1-2. pp. 338-341
Personal photo collection
  • M Ramage
Ramage, M. (2012) Personal photo collection