ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Macedonia, as a part of the Balkan Peninsula, ranks among the most important regions in terms of amphibian and reptile biodiversity. Thus far, 14 amphibian and 32 reptile species have been found to occur in Macedonia, but with some exceptions among reptiles, the distribution of most of taxa is poorly understood and/or records have only rarely been published. We report here records on 10 amphibian and 28 reptile taxa from 85 different localities covering most of the habitats in Macedonia. Despite the field survey was conducted during two weeks in June 2014 only, we have recorded new distribution data for 22 reptile species.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Introduction
The Balkan Peninsula is considered to be a biodiver-
sity hotspot for European biotas (Gaston and David,
1994; Džukić and Kalezić, 2004; Griffiths et al., 2004;
Hewitt, 2011). However, many regions of the Balkans
are still poorly evaluated in terms of basic zoological
research, i.e. species distributions and their occurrence
patterns. Macedonia is an inland country situated in the
central part of the Balkans. The territory of Macedo-
nia covers an area of 25,713 km2 and includes several
important geomorphological units, such as the Vardar
River valley, the Helenides, the Dinaric range and the
Thrace-Macedonian massif within three main biogeo-
graphic-climate regions extending in the country: Al-
pine, Continental and Mediterranean (Král, 2001; Reed
et al., 2004; Melovski et al., 2013). For herpetofauna,
this part of the Balkans has presumably served as micro-
refugia for some species (e.g. Lacerta viridis complex,
Marzahn et al., 2016), as a contact zone of different
evolutionary lineages of species after the Last Glacial
Maximum (e.g., Triturus spp., Wielstra et al., 2014;
Natrix natrix, Kindler et al., 2013) or as a presumable
migration corridor for several Mediterranean elements
(e.g. Testudo graeca, Mediodactylus kotschyi, Platy-
ceps najadum, Zamenis situla; Crnobrnja-Isailović and
Aleksić, 1999; Tomović et al., 2014; Sterijovski et al.,
2014).
Species composition of amphibians and reptiles in
the Republic of Macedonia is fairly well known (e.g.
Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al., 2014, 2015) but the exact
distribution of most of the species in the country is not
very well documented. Based on present knowledge,
the fauna of Macedonia includes 14 amphibian species
and 32 reptile species with respect to current taxonomy
(sensu Speybroeck et al., 2010).
There were some recent advances on new records
published (e.g. Rot-Nikćević et al., 2001; Džukić et
al., 2005, 2008; Vukov et al., 2006; Sidorovska, 2010;
Žagar et al., 2013; Wielstra et al., 2014), especially for
Herpetology Notes, volume 9: 201-220 (2016) (published online on 14 October 2016)
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the
Republic of Macedonia
Marcel Uhrin1,*, Peter Havaš2, Martin Minařík3, Karel Kodejš3, Imrich Bugoš2, Stanislav Danko2, Tomáš Husák4,
Daniel Koleska4 and Daniel Jablonski5
1 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P.J.
Šafárik University, Moyzesova 11, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
2 Fauna Carpatica, Maďarská 5, 040 13 Košice, Slovakia.
3 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles Univer-
sity in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
4 Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology,
Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sci-
ences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ– 165 21 Prague 6, Czech
Republic.
5 Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava,
Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia.
* Corresponding author e-mail: marcel.uhrin@gmail.com
Abstract. Macedonia, as a part of the Balkan Peninsula, ranks among the most important regions in terms of amphibian and
reptile biodiversity. Thus far, 14 amphibian and 32 reptile species have been found to occur in Macedonia, but with some ex-
ceptions among reptiles, the distribution of most of taxa is poorly understood and/or records have only rarely been published.
We report here records on 10 amphibian and 28 reptile taxa from 85 different localities covering most of the habitats in Mace-
donia. Despite the field survey was conducted during two weeks in June 2014 only, we have recorded new distribution data
for 22 reptile species.
Keywords. Amphibia, Reptilia, new records, Balkan Peninsula, mapping, chorology.
Marcel Uhrin et al.
202
reptiles, where a comprehensive review has just recently
been provided (Sterijovski et al., 2014). However, there
are still species whose occurrence is poorly known.
Therefore, we present here the results of short but
extensive field study on amphibians and reptiles in the
country with a distribution updates for several species.
Material and methods
A herpetological field survey conducted across the
whole country was carried out during two weeks in
June 2014. Altogether, 86 localities representing most
regions of Macedonia (Table 1) were surveyed. We re-
corded the geographic coordinates (WGS84 system) and
altitude
of all visited localities as well as other relevant
faunistic data. The distribution data of individual species
or
species complexes are presented in Universal Trans-
verse Mercator (UTM) grid maps with the resolution of
squares of 10×10 km (Figures 1–3). All herpetological
findings were properly documented in the field and most
of them were photographed (individuals and habitats).
Records were compared with data presented in sum-
mary accounts (Gasc et al., 1997; Sterijovski et al., 2014;
Sillero et al., 2014, 2015) and with other works related
to regional herpetofauna (Džukić et al., 2005, 2008; Vu-
kov et al., 2006; Sidorovska, 2010; Jelić et al., 2013;
Žagar et al., 2013). Species identification followed Ar-
nold and Ovenden (2002), taxonomy and nomenclature
were adopted from Speybroeck et al. (2010), consider-
ing also recent taxonomical revisions pertaining to bat-
racho- and herpetofauna of this region (e.g. Wielstra et
al., 2013; Hedges et al., 2014).
Results and discussion
A list of all recorded species is presented in Table 1. In
total, we obtained 289 amphibian and reptile records of
38 species (79% of the total number of known species
of Macedonia). Ten of them were amphibians and 28
reptiles, which represent 64% and 85% of all species
known from Macedonia. In comparison with the results
of Sterijovski et al. (2014) we have found 62 new grid
records in a resolution of 10×10 UTM for 22 reptile spe-
cies (Figures 2 and 3).
Below we provide a list of recorded species (arranged
by taxonomic groups and families) with a number of
records given in parentheses after scientific taxa name
and with a short description of the species distribution
in the country and a list of new sites with information
on the site altitude. When appropriate, comments on the
circumstances of the record and/or biological, ecologi-
cal and biogeographical notes were added.
Amphibia
Salamandridae
Salamandra salamandra (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=4) (Tab.
1, Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: According to reported cho-
rological data (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al., 2014,
2015), fire salamanders are probably widespread mostly
in the mountain regions of the country.
Comments: We recorded fire salamanders at four sites;
three records were made at higher altitude (887, 929,
1,680 m) and one (Treska river Gorge; Figs 4A and 5A)
represented a relatively low elevation for this species in
the Balkans region (319 m; cf. Jablonski et al., 2013).
The latter site is situated out of the species range delin-
eated by available chorological data (Gasc et al., 1997;
Sillero et al., 2014, 2015).
Triturus sp. (N=1) (Tab. 1, Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: From the genus Triturus
Rafinesque, 1815, two species occur in Macedonia,
T. ivanbureschi Arntzen & Wielstra, 2013 and T
macedonicus (Karaman, 1922), but accurate data on
their distribution are still lacking (Wielstra et al., 2014).
Both species have a contact zone of their ranges in the
eastern part of the country (Wielstra et al., 2014).
Comments: We recorded several newt larvae in Dojran
Lake, near Mrdaja village (153 m). Species affiliation
of the specimens was not possible to confirm but so far
only T. macedonicus was reported to occur in the vicin-
ity of Dojran Lake (Wielstra et al., 2014).
Bombinatoridae
Bombina variegata (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=5) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Probably a widespread spe-
cies over the entire country (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et
al., 2014, 2015).
Comments: We recorded yellow-bellied toads at five
sites in four 10×10 km quadrates in altitudes from 303
(Treska River Gorge) to 1,601 (Baba in Galičica Mts.)
metres. The record in the central part of the country
(Toplica village, 677 m) is situated out of previously
delineated range (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al., 2014,
2015).
Pelobatidae
Pelobates syriacus Boettger, 1889 (N=2) (Tab. 1, Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Probably a widespread low-
land species, missing only from the mountain ranges in
the north of the country (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al.,
2014, 2015). Data about the occurrence are concentrated
along the Vardar River including its tributaries and near
larger lakes (Dojran, Prespa and Ohrid regions; Džukić
et al., 2005, 2008).
Comments: We recorded P. syriacus at two previously
known localities (Dojran and Prespa Lakes) (Džukić et
al., 2008).
Bufonidae
Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=8) (Tab. 1, Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Widespread in the eastern
and southern parts of the country (Gasc et al., 1997; Sil-
lero et al., 2014, 2015).
Comments: We recorded B. bufo at eight sites in the
regions of two large lakes (Dojran and Prespa Lakes)
and along the Vardar River valley prevailingly on lower
altitudes (120–854 m). Records near Glumovo (282 m)
and Dolna Matka villages (316 m) are situated out of
previously delineated range (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et
al., 2014, 2015) of this species in Macedonia.
Bufo viridis Laurenti, 1768 complex (N=6) (Tab. 1, Fig.
1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The distribution pattern is
not yet fully known (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al.,
2014, 2015).
Figure 1. Maps of the distribution of amphibian species. Records are presented in the 10×10 km UTM mapping quadrates cover-
ing the territory of Macedonia. Dark orange circles – our records; grey circle – data by Sidorovska (2010). For precise site data,
see Table 1.
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 203
Comments: We found specimen of this species com-
plex at six sites in Macedonia, among them record near
Dolna Matka village (352 m) is situated out of previ-
ously delineated species range in this region (Gasc et al.,
1997; Sillero et al., 2014, 2015). Because two species
of the “viridis” complex probably occur in the area of
Macedonia, B. variabilis (Pallas, 1769) in the eastern
part and B. viridis s. str. in the western part of the coun-
try (cf. Stöck et al., 2009), exact species affiliation is not
possible applying morphological identification only.
Hylidae
Hyla arborea (Linnaeus, 1758) complex (N=2) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The current distribution
knowledge is limited to eastern and southern parts of
the country (Sillero et al., 2014, 2015).
Comments: We recorded this species at two sites
(Nikolić village, Stenje village) near large lakes (Dojran
Lake and Prespa Lake). Hyla arborea s. str. occurs in
Macedonia; however, the occurrence of H. orientalis
Bedriaga, 1890, in the eastern part of the country could
not be excluded (cf. Stöck et al., 2012; Gvoždík et al.,
2015). The distribution status of the latter species is gen-
erally not well known.
Ranidae
Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771) (N=17) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The marsh frog is wide-
spread in different types of water habitats throughout
the whole country (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al., 2014,
2015), similarly as in neighbouring countries (cf. Hax-
hiu, 1994; Krizmanić, 2008; Vukov et al., 2013).
Comments: Our observations (altogether 17 site records)
together with several exactly located records available
from Macedonia (Sidorovska, 2010) considerably sup-
plemented the pattern of distribution of this species pre-
viously delineated in 50×50 km quadrates only (Gasc et
al., 1997; Sillero et al., 2014, 2015).
Rana dalmatina Fitzinger, 1838 (N=4) (Tab. 1, Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The occurrence of the agile
frog in Macedonia is limited to the mountainous regions
on the eastern and western country borders (Gasc et al.,
1997; Sillero et al., 2014, 2015). The lack of occurrence
data from the central part of the country could be due
to the low level of surveillance since the species is
commonly widespread in neighbouring countries from
sea level to 1,500 metres (Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, and
Serbia: Haxhiu, 1994; Valakos et al., 2008; Jablonski,
2011; Stojanov et al., 2011; Vukov et al., 2013).
Comments: We recorded this species at four sites in two
regions, Dojran and Mrdaja villages near Dojran Lake
and near Magarevo village in Pelister Mts. Latter records
were made at altitudes of 1,286 and 1,626 metres, that
are relatively high compared with the altitude data from
Albania or Bulgaria (Haxhiu, 1994; Stojanov et al.,
2011).
Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 (N=2) (Tab. 1, Fig. 1)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Precise data from Macedonia
are missing; the species is reported to occur in northern
mountain regions only (Gasc et al., 1997; Sillero et al.,
2014, 2015).
Comments: We reported this species at two already
known sites (Šar Planina Mt., Popovac Šapka,
2,241 m; Vrben village, 1,289 m) in the western part of
the country, where the species was recently reported
as common by Sidorovska (2010).
Reptilia
Testudinidae
Testudo graeca Linneaus, 1758 (N=7) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: A widespread species found
all over the country, with fewer records from the southern
parts (Sterijovski et al. 2014). Records from the western
part of the country should be considered carefully due to
the species range limit; records in neighbouring Albania
were considered doubtful (Haxhiu, 1998; Haxhiu and
Oruçi, 2001; Buskirk et al., 2001; Jablonski, 2011).
New records: Krivolak village (155 m), Kurija village
(167 m), Raec River gorge (211 m) (Fig. 4B).
Comments: We made altogether seven observations of
this species in the south-eastern region; new records
considerably supplement the pattern of known species
range in the south-eastern region of the country.
Testudo hermanni Gmelin, 1789 (N=20) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: A widespread and relative-
ly abundant species, absent in the highest mountains
(Ljubisavljević et al., 2014; Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Gevgelija near Vardar River (58 m),
Gjavato village (58 m), Gorni Disan village (406 m),
Kosel village (770 m), Pretor village (854 m), Tikveš
Lake (290 m), Vataša village (350 m), Vataša village
(Luda Mara river) (401 m).
Comments: Hermann’s tortoise seems to be a common
Marcel Uhrin et al.
204
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 205
Figure 2. Maps of the distribution of reptile species with new records. Records are presented in 10×10 km UTM mapping quad-
rates covering the territory of Macedonia and comparing with previously known species distribution patterns (grey colour; sensu
Sidorovska, 2010; Žagar et al., 2013; Sterijovski et al., 2014). Dark orange circles – records re-confirmed occurrence in quadrates
by new records of this study; red circles – new occupied quadrates based on our new records. For precise site data, see Table 1.
species in the country; we made twenty observations
covering the range provided by Sterijovski et al. (2014).
At four sites we recorded syntopic occurrence of T.
hermanni and T. graeca: Dedeli village, Kurija village,
Nikolić village and Pretor village.
Geoemydidae
Mauremys rivulata (Valenciennes, 1833) (N=1) (Tab.
1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The Balkan terrapin is prob-
ably a very rare species in Macedonia, where only a few
records are known from across the Vardar River valley
and in the surroundings of Dojran Lake (cf. Sterijovski
et al., 2014).
New record: Dedeli village (205 m).
Comments: We observed one killed adult female (Fig.
4C) ca. 1.6 km south of Dedeli village. This finding, to-
gether with records from Dojran Lake from 2010 (Žagar
et al., 2013) confirm the contemporary occurrence of
this rare species in this region.
Emydidae
Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=3) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The range of the European
pond turtle in Macedonia is represented by scarce data
dispersed almost all over the country where species oc-
currence is limited to suitable water habitats and laying
sites (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Gevgelija near Vardar River (58 m), Ra-
dobor village (588 m).
Comments: Sterijovski et al. (2014) reported this spe-
cies for eleven UTM squares. We recorded it at three
sites, two of which could be considered as new.
Gekkonidae
Mediodactylus kotschyi (Steindachner, 1870) (N=6)
(Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The species range in Mac-
edonia is limited to the Vardar River valley (Sterijovski
et al., 2014; Sillero et al., 2014, 2015). Outside this re-
gion only one observation was reported, from the west-
ern part of the country (Debar; Sidorovska, 2010).
New records: Krivolak village (120 m), Dolna Matka
village (309 m), Novo Konsko village (Konska reka
river) (198 m), Pepelište village (126 m) (Fig. 4D).
Comments: Our records at six sites supported the gen-
eral occurrence pattern (e.g. Sterijovski et al., 2014),
with the new record as the northernmost site at Dolna
Matka village.
Lacertidae
Algyroides nigropunctatus (Duméril and Bibron, 1839)
(N=3) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: A rare species with a south-
ern distribution limit between Ohrid and the Prespa
Lakes region and with a possibly isolated population
recorded in the Treska River valley (Sterijovski et al.,
2014).
Comments: We recorded this species in relatively high
abundance (tens of individuals) at three already known
sites (Dolna Matka village, Trpejca village, north of
Stenje village).
Lacerta trilineata Bedriaga, 1886 (N=18) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The species is among the
most common representatives of Macedonian reptilian
fauna and is widespread all over the country (Sterijovski
et al., 2014).
New records: Asamati village (878 m), Gjavato village
(58 m), Nikolić village (288 m), Raec River gorge (211
m), Toplica village (577 m, 677 m).
Comments: We made observations at 18 different sites
in various parts of Macedonia which corresponded with
the previous view on the species distribution. Records
from new quadrates supplemented the species distribu-
tion mainly in the southern part of the country.
Lacerta viridis (Laurenti, 1768) complex (N=15) (Tab.
1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The green lizard is a com-
mon, abundant and widespread species in Macedonia
(Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Gorno Perovo vilage (859 m), Kastiljo
(Pčinja River) (274 m), Nikolić village (160 m, 199 m),
Radobor village (580 m), Sveti Naum (695 m).
Comments: We documented this species at 21 sites
throughout the country; five new records contributed to
new data for five UTM quadrates. The species is locally
abundant; we observed tens of individuals in several
sites (Kurija village, Dolna Matka village, Nikolić vil-
lage, Radobor village, Stenje village).
Podarcis erhardii (Bedriaga, 1876) (N=5) (Tab. 1, Fig.
2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Erhard’s wall lizard is
Marcel Uhrin et al.
206
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 207
Figure 3. Maps of the distribution of reptile species with new records. See the legend to Figure 2 for more details.
Marcel Uhrin et al.
208
a common and locally abundant species in Macedonia
(Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Kosel village (777 m), Pretor village (854
m).
Comments: We recorded this species at five sites only,
with two localities situated in new UTM quadrates. The
species was found at some sites in abundant (more than
ten observed individuals) populations (Pretor village,
Dolna Matka village).
Podarcis muralis (Laurenti, 1768) (N=18) (Tab. 1, Fig.
2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: As with the previous species,
the common wall lizard is widespread and found locally
abundant in Macedonia (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Kosel village (770 m), Ohrid (old town)
(729 m).
Comments: We recorded 18 sites in 12 quadrates, which
confirm the common occurrence of this species in
Macedonia.
Podarcis tauricus (Pallas, 1814) (N=4) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Records of the Balkan wall
lizard are dispersed throughout the central and south-
western parts of the country (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Gevgelija near the Vardar River (58 m),
Pretor village (854 m).
Comments: We recorded this lizard at four sites within
three quadrates, two of them being new. Abundant pop-
ulations were observed, e.g. near Stenje village, where
the species occurred in synthopy with two other taxa
(Fig. 4E).
Zootoca vivipara (Lichtenstein, 1823) (N=1) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The viviparous lizard repre-
sents a Euro-Siberian faunal element with a range lim-
ited to the highest mountains in the northern and north-
western parts of Macedonia (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
Comments: We recorded this species at an only site
(Popova Šapka) in already known area at high elevation
(2,057 and 2,157 metres) at the Šar Planina Mt.
Scincidae
Ablepharus kitaibelii Bibron and Bory de Saint-Vin-
cent, 1833 (N=1) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The scarcity of snake-eyed
skink distribution in Macedonia (Sterijovski et al.,
2014) was recently supplemented by one record from
2010 reported from the Dojran Lake region (Žagar et
al., 2013).
New record: Trojaci village (549 m).
Comments: Our observation in Trojaci village from
central Macedonia represents a new site outside the pre-
viously delineated range (Fig. 4F and 5C).
Anguidae
Anguis fragilis Linnaeus, 1758 complex (N=5) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Two species of slow worms
occur in Macedonia (Jablonski et al., 2016) where are
they considered as common (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
Comments: In total, we found this taxon on five sites in
the western part of the country at altitudes of 920–1,630
meters within the previously known range. Based on ex-
ternal morphology inspection only, these records could
not be assigned to any of two species of slow worms,
Anguis fragilis Linnaeus, 1758 s. str. and A. graeca
Bedriaga, 1881, which occur in this part of Macedonia
(Jablonski et al., 2016). However, according to the dis-
tribution pattern presented by Jablonski et al. (2016) we
can expect that both recorded localities in SW Macedo-
nia (Magarevo and Stenje villages) inhabits A. graeca.
Pseudopus apodus (Pallas, 1775) (N=2) (Tab. 1, Fig. 2)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The glass lizard has a very
limited range in Macedonia, with confirmed occurrence
in the southern part of the Vardar River valley, including
the region of Dojran Lake only, where it was confirmed
from at beginning of the herpetological research in the
country (Doflein, 1921) as well as recently (Sterijovski
et al., 2014).
Comments: We only re-confirmed the occurrence of
this species at two known sites in the vicinity of Dojran
Lake (Nikolić village, Nov Dojran).
Typhlopidae
Xerotyphlops vermicularis (Merrem, 1820) (N=2) (Tab.
1, Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The range of the worm snake
in Macedonia is limited to the Vardar River valley and
isolated occurrences in the north-east part (Sterijovski
et al., 2014).
New record: Baltalija village (332 m).
Comments: Large numbers of individuals were
recorded near Nikolić village. At the new locality in
Baltalija village, one dead specimen was found on the
road.
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 209
Figure 4. Some representatives of batrachofauna and herpetofauna from Macedonia. ASalamandra salamandra, a juvenile
individual from the Treska River Gorge near Dolna Matka village. B – Testudo graeca, an adult individual from Krivolak village.
C – Mauremys rivulata, an adult female killed near Dedeli village. D – Mediodactylus kotschyi, an adult individual from Krivolak
village. E – Podarcis tauricus (bottom), P. erhardii (middle), P. muralis (top), adult individuals occurring in syntopy near Stenje
village (Prespa Lake). F – Ablepharus kitaibelii, an adult male from Trojaci village. G – Eryx jaculus, a subadult individual from
the Kurija village vicinity. H – Elaphe quatuorlineata, an adult female from Gevgelija near the Vardar River.
Marcel Uhrin et al.
210
Site name Date Coordinates
N/E
Altitude
[m a. s. l.]
Salamandra salamandra
Triturus sp.
Bombina variegata
Pelobates syriacus
Bufo bufo
Bufo viridis
complex
Hyla arborea complex
Pelophylax ridibundus
Rana dalmatina
Rana temporaria
Testudo graeca
Testudo hermanni
Mauremys rivulata
Emys orbicularis
Mediodactylus kotschyi
Algyroides nigropunctatus
Lacerta trilineata
Lacerta viridis complex
Podarcis erhardii
Podarcis muralis
Asamati village (Prespa Lake) 8. 6. 2014 40°58' 21⁰03' 880 1*
Baba (Galičica Mt.) 8. & 10. 6. 2014 40°57' 20°49' 1,600 9 1
Babuna village 5. 6. 2014 41°41' 21°48' 172 1 >10 1
Baltalija village 7. 6. 2014 41°37' 22°15' 333 2
Bibaj (Korab Mt.) 9. 6. 2014 41°43' 20°37' 1,175 >5
Bilbil Kamen (Bitola) 7. 6. 2014 41°02' 21°18' 676
Brli kamen (Galičica Mt.) 10. 6.2014 40°57' 20°48' 1,353 >10
Bučište village 6. 6. 2014 41°56' 22°11' 387
Carina village 8. 6. 2014 40°57' 20°53' 1,053 1
Crkvino village 5. 6. 2014 41°39' 21°48' 276356 1 2 >10
Crničani village 6.8. 6. 2014 41°14' 22°38' 176256 >10 1 1
Dedeli village 1 7. 6. 2014 41°16' 22°36' 165 1 1
Dedeli village 2 5. 6. 2014 41°16' 22°36' 205 1*
Dervenska klisura Gorge 7. 6. 2014 41°37' 22°17' 371
Dojran (Nov Dojran, Star Dojran) (Dojran Lake) 6.8. 6. 2014 41°12' 22°42' 143178 1 >10 1 8 1 1
Dolna Matka village 1 (Treska River Gorge) 6., 7. & 9. 6. 2014 41°57' 21°17' 296450 1 1 2 >10* >10
Dolna Matka village 2 (Treska River Gorge) 9. 6. 2014 41°56' 21°18' 296450 1 1 1 >10 1 >10
Frangovo village 9. 6. 2014 41°08' 20°37' 752 >10
Gevgelija (Vardar River) 9. 6. 2014 41°09' 22°30' 58 >5 1* 3*
Gjavato village 8. 6. 2014 41°10' 22°32' 58 2* >5*
Gjavato village (Vardar River) 9. 6. 2014 41°11' 22°31' 60 1 3
Glumovo village 9. 6. 2014 41°59' 21°19' 282 1
Gorna Bela Crkva village 11. 6. 2014 41°03' 21°01' 862
Gorni Disan village 9. 6. 2014 41°24' 22°06' 406 1*
Gorno Perovo village 8. & 11. 6. 2014 41°01' 20°59' 859 2*
Heraclea Lyncestis (Bitola) 12. 6. 2014 41°00' 21°20' 614630 >5
Kalin Kamen (Sveta voda) (Osogovski Planini Mts.) 6. 6. 2014 42°11' 22°23' 1,285 1 >5
Kastiljo (Pčinja River) 5. 6. 2014 41°50' 21°41' 274 1*
Koritski rid (Galičica Mt.) 8. 6. 2014 40°58' 20°48' 1,3531,422 1
Table 1. A review of amphibian and reptile records from Macedonia (June 2014). An asterisk (*) represents a new species site for Macedonia as compared with previously published data (for
details see the species accounts in the text).
Table 1. Continued.
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 211
6LWHQDPH 'DWH &RRUGLQDWHV
1(
$OWLWXGH
>PDVO@
6DODPDQGUDVDODPDQGUD
7ULWXUXVVS
%RPELQDYDULHJDWD
3HOREDWHVV\ULDFXV
%XIREXIR
%XIRYLULGLVFRPSOH[
+\ODDUERUHDFRPSOH[
3HORSK\OD[ULGLEXQGXV
5DQDGDOPDWLQD
5DQDWHPSRUDULD
7HVWXGRJUDHFD
7HVWXGRKHUPDQQL
0DXUHP\VULYXODWD
(P\VRUELFXODULV
0HGLRGDFW\OXVNRWVFK\L
$OJ\URLGHVQLJURSXQFWDWXV
/DFHUWDWULOLQHDWD
/DFHUWDYLULGLVFRPSOH[
3RGDUFLVHUKDUGLL
3RGDUFLVPXUDOLV
.RVHOYLOODJH      
.UDMQDSORV*DOLþLFD0W                       !
.UDWRYR.UDWRYVNDUHND5LYHU   
.ULYD3DODQND.ULYDUHND5LYHU                       
.ULYRODNYLOODJH   ±   !  
.XULMDYLOODJH               !      !  
/HVNRHFYLOODJH   
0DJDUHYRYLOODJH,]YLGQLFD3HOLVWHU0WV                      !
0DYURYL$QRYLYLOODJH     !
0DYURYL$QRYLYLOODJH                       !
0RLQYLOODJH   ±
0UGDMDYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH    !  !    !            
0UGDMDYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH    
0U]HQFLYLOODJH   ±                    
1DVHOED'DPMDQ   
1LNROLüYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH   ±        !         ! !  
1LNROLüYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH   
1RYR.RQVNRYLOODJH.RQVNDUHND5LYHU                       
2KULGROGWRZQ    !
2UDãDFYLOODJH                       
2WHãHYRYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH   ± 
3HSHOLãWHYLOODJH                       
3LUDYDYLOODJH   
3RNUYHQLNYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH                       
3RSRYDâDSNDâDU3ODQLQD0W   ± 
3RSRYDâDSNDâDU3ODQLQD0W             !          
3RSRYDâDSNDâDU3ODQLQD0W   
 !
3UHWRUYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH           !    !       ! !
5DERUFLYLOODJH   
Table 1. Continued.
Marcel Uhrin et al.
212
6LWHQDPH 'DWH &RRUGLQDWHV
1(
$OWLWXGH
>PDVO@
6DODPDQGUDVDODPDQGUD
7ULWXUXVVS
%RPELQDYDULHJDWD
3HOREDWHVV\ULDFXV
%XIREXIR
%XIRYLULGLVFRPSOH[
+\ODDUERUHDFRPSOH[
3HORSK\OD[ULGLEXQGXV
5DQDGDOPDWLQD
5DQDWHPSRUDULD
7HVWXGRJUDHFD
7HVWXGRKHUPDQQL
0DXUHP\VULYXODWD
(P\VRUELFXODULV
0HGLRGDFW\OXVNRWVFK\L
$OJ\URLGHVQLJURSXQFWDWXV
/DFHUWDWULOLQHDWD
/DFHUWDYLULGLVFRPSOH[
3RGDUFLVHUKDUGLL
3RGDUFLVPXUDOLV
5DEURYRYLOODJH                       
5DGRERUYLOODJH ±  ± !   !
5DHF5LYHUJRUJH                       
5DQNRYFHYLOODJH   ± 
5LEQLFDYLOODJH   ±                   
5LEQLFDYLOODJH   
5RVRPDQYLOODJH                       
5RWLQRYLOODJH    
6RILODULYLOODJH.ULYD/DNDYLFD5LYHU ±          !            
6WHQMHYLOODJH ±  ±    ! !   ! ! !
6WHQMHYLOODJH              !    !   ! !
6YHWL1DXP    !  !
âXUOHQFLYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH                      
7LNYHãNR(]HUR/DNH    
7RSOLFDYLOODJH  ±                    
7RSROþDQLYLOODJH   
7UHEHQLãWDYLOODJH                       
7UQRYDFYLOODJH    
7UQRYRYLOODJH3HOLVWHU0W                       
7URMDFLYLOODJH   
7USHMFDYLOODJH   ±                !    !
9DODQGRYRYLOODJH   
9DWDãDYLOODJH/XGD0DUD5LYHU ±                      
9DWDãDYLOODJH/XGD0DUD5LYHU    
9RMQLNYLOODJH                       
9RMQLNYLOODJH.ULYDUHND5LYHU    
9R]DUFLYLOODJH&UQDUHND5LYHU                      
9UEHQYLOODJH ±  ±   !
1RRIVLWHV                      
1RRIVSHFLPHQ    ! ! !   ! !  !  !   ! ! ! ! ! !
Table 1. Continued.
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 213
Table 1. Continued.
Site name Date Coordinates
N/E
Altitude
[m a. s. l.]
Podarcis tauricus
Zootoca vivipara
Ablepharus kitaibelii
Anguis fragilis complex
Pseudopus apodus
Xerotyphlops vermicularis
Eryx jaculus
Malpolon insignitus
Natrix natrix
Natrix tessellata
Coronella austriaca
Dolichophis caspius
Elaphe quatuorlineata
Platyceps najadum
Telescopus fallax
Zamenis longissimus
Zamenis situla
Vipera ammodytes
Asamati village (Prespa Lake) 8. 6. 2014 40°58' 21⁰03' 880 1* 1*
Baba (Galičica Mt.) 8. & 10. 6. 2014 40°57' 20°49' 1,600
Babuna village 5. 6. 2014 41°41' 21°48' 172
Baltalija village 7. 6. 2014 41°37' 22°15' 333
1* 1*
Bibaj (Korab Mt.) 9. 6. 2014 41°43' 20°37' 1,175
Bilbil Kamen (Bitola) 7. 6. 2014 41°02' 21°18' 676
1
Brli kamen (Galičica Mt.) 10. 6.2014 40°57' 20°48' 1,353
Bučište village 6. 6. 2014 41°56' 22°11' 387
1*
Carina village 8. 6. 2014 40°57' 20°53' 1,053
Crkvino village 5. 6. 2014 41°39' 21°48' 276356
1
1
Crničani village 6.8. 6. 2014 41°14' 22°38' 176256 1 1* 1 1
Dedeli village 1 7. 6. 2014 41°16' 22°36' 165
1*
Dedeli village 2 5. 6. 2014 41°16' 22°36' 205
Dervenska klisura Gorge 7. 6. 2014 41°37' 22°17' 371
1*
Dojran (Nov Dojran, Star Dojran) (Dojran Lake) 6.8. 6. 2014 41°12' 22°42' 143178 1 1 2* 1 1
Dolna Matka village 1 (Treska River Gorge) 6.,
7. & 9. 6. 2014 41°57' 21°17' 296450
1*
2 1
Dolna Matka village 2 (Treska River Gorge) 9. 6. 2014 41°56' 21°18' 296450
Frangovo village 9. 6. 2014 41°08' 20°37' 752
Gevgelija (Vardar River) 9. 6. 2014 41°09' 22°30' 58 >10* 1*
Gjavato village 8. 6. 2014 41°10' 22°32' 58
1*
Gjavato village (Vardar River) 9. 6. 2014 41°11' 22°31' 60
Glumovo village 9. 6. 2014 41°59' 21°19' 282
Gorna Bela Crkva village 11. 6. 2014 41°03' 21°01' 862 1 1
Gorni Disan village 9. 6. 2014 41°24' 22°06' 406
Gorno Perovo village 8. & 11. 6. 2014 41°01' 20°59' 859 1* 1
Heraclea Lyncestis (Bitola) 12. 6. 2014 41°00' 21°20' 614630
1
Kalin Kamen (Sveta voda) (Osogovski Planini Mts.) 6. 6. 2014 42°11' 22°23' 1,285 1
Kastiljo (Pčinja River) 5. 6. 2014 41°50' 21°41' 274
Koritski rid (Galičica Mt.) 8. 6.2014 40°58' 20°48' 1,3531,422 1
Table 1. Continued.
Marcel Uhrin et al.
214
7
D
EO
H

&
RQ
WL
QXH
G

6LWHQDPH 'DWH &RRUGLQDWHV
1(
$OWLWXGH
>PDVO@
3RGDUFLVWDXULFXV
=RRWRFDYLYLSDUD
$EOHSKDUXVNLWDLEHOLL
$QJXLVIUDJLOLVFRPSOH[
3VHXGRSXVDSRGXV
;HURW\SKORSVYHUPLFXODULV
(U\[MDFXOXV
0DOSRORQLQVLJQLWXV
1DWUL[QDWUL[
1DWUL[WHVVHOODWD
&RURQHOODDXVWULDFD
'ROLFKRSKLVFDVSLXV
(ODSKHTXDWXRUOLQHDWD
3ODW\FHSVQDMDGXP
7HOHVFRSXVIDOOD[
=DPHQLVORQJLVVLPXV
=DPHQLVVLWXOD
9LSHUDDPPRG\WHV
.RVHOYLOODJH      
.UDMQDSORV*DOLþLFD0W   
.UDWRYR.UDWRYVNDUHND5LYHU      
 
.ULYD3DODQND.ULYDUHND5LYHU   
   
.ULYRODNYLOODJH   ±   
.XULMDYLOODJH   

 
/HVNRHFYLOODJH       
 
0DJDUHYRYLOODJH,]YLGQLFD3HOLVWHU0WV  
 
0DYURYL$QRYLYLOODJH    
 
 
0DYURYL$QRYLYLOODJH   
 
 
0RLQYLOODJH   ±  
  
0UGDMDYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH   
  
0UGDMDYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH       
0U]HQFLYLOODJH   ±
 

1DVHOED'DPMDQ      
 
 
1LNROLüYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH   ±
!
 
   
1LNROLüYLOODJH'RMUDQ/DNH    
  
1RYR.RQVNRYLOODJH.RQVNDUHND5LYHU    
2KULGROGWRZQ      
2UDãDFYLOODJH   
 
2WHãHYRYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH   ±  
3HSHOLãWHYLOODJH   
3LUDYDYLOODJH      
 
3RNUYHQLNYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH   
3RSRYDâDSNDâDU3ODQLQD0W   ±    
3RSRYDâDSNDâDU3ODQLQD0W    
 
3RSRYDâDSNDâDU3ODQLQD0W   
   
 
3UHWRUYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH    !

5DERUFLYLOODJH       
Table 1. Continued.
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 215
6LWHQDPH 'DWH &RRUGLQDWHV
1(
$OWLWXGH
>PDVO@
3RGDUFLVWDXULFXV
=RRWRFDYLYLSDUD
$EOHSKDUXVNLWDLEHOLL
$QJXLVIUDJLOLVFRPSOH[
3VHXGRSXVDSRGXV
;HURW\SKORSVYHUPLFXODULV
(U\[MDFXOXV
0DOSRORQLQVLJQLWXV
1DWUL[QDWUL[
1DWUL[WHVVHOODWD
&RURQHOODDXVWULDFD
'ROLFKRSKLVFDVSLXV
(ODSKHTXDWXRUOLQHDWD
3ODW\FHSVQDMDGXP
7HOHVFRSXVIDOOD[
=DPHQLVORQJLVVLPXV
=DPHQLVVLWXOD
9LSHUDDPPRG\WHV
5DEURYRYLOODJH                     
5DGRERUYLOODJH ±  ± 
5DHF5LYHUJRUJH                     
5DQNRYFHYLOODJH   ± 
5LEQLFDYLOODJH   ±                 
5LEQLFDYLOODJH    
5RVRPDQYLOODJH                     
5RWLQRYLOODJH   
6RILODULYLOODJH.ULYD/DNDYLFD5LYHU ±                    
6WHQMHYLOODJH ±  ± !    
6WHQMHYLOODJH   !                 
6YHWL1DXP     
âXUOHQFLYLOODJH3UHVSD/DNH                    
7LNYHãNR(]HUR/DNH   
7RSOLFDYLOODJH  ±                  
7RSROþDQLYLOODJH    
7UHEHQLãWDYLOODJH                     
7UQRYDFYLOODJH   
7UQRYRYLOODJH3HOLVWHU0W                     
7URMDFLYLOODJH    
7USHMFDYLOODJH   ±          !        
9DODQGRYRYLOODJH    
9DWDãDYLOODJH/XGD0DUD5LYHU ±                    
9DWDãDYLOODJH/XGD0DUD5LYHU   
9RMQLNYLOODJH                     
9RMQLNYLOODJH.ULYDUHND5LYHU   
9R]DUFLYLOODJH&UQDUHND5LYHU                    
9UEHQYLOODJH ±  ± 
1RRIVLWHV                    
1RRIVSHFLPHQ   !     !    !        
Erycidae
Eryx jaculus (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=1) (Tab. 1, Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: This species is very rare in
Macedonia, with only six recorded quadrates without
any recent records (Sterijovski et al. 2014). Historically,
this species was recorded in central Macedonia, in the
Babuna River gorge, Bašino village (both Veles region)
and Ulanci village in the Gradsko region (Dimovski,
1971; Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New record: Kurija village (166 m).
Comments: The historical record from Ulanci village
(Dimovski, 1971) is the closest to our new record lo-
cated near Kurija village. One subadult specimen (male,
ca 30 cm) was found on a local road in a dry habitat with
soft soil conditions (Fig. 4G).
Psammophiidae
Malpolon insignitus (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1827)
(N=13) (Tab. 1, Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The distribution of the East-
ern Montpellier snake is probably not yet well docu-
mented; most records were so far from the eastern part
of the country (Sterijovski et al. 2014).
New records: Baltalija village (333 m), Dedeli village
(164 m), Dervenska klisura gorge (371 m), Gjavato vil-
lage (58 m), Gorno Perovo village (859 m), Mojin vil-
lage (151 m), Mrzenci village (84 m), Naselba Damjan
(480 m), Orašac village (330 m), Raec River gorge (211
m), Valandovo (143 m).
Comments: Many new records found with our survey
suggest that species’ distribution in the country is still
under-estimated. Only two of our 13 observations were
situated in previously known UTM quadrates; thus, our
findings considerably supplement the view on the spe-
cies range in Macedonia. Almost all of our records (10)
were specimens found killed on the road, thus we can
assume that the detectability of live individuals is dif-
ficult. It could be the main reason behind the poor distri-
butional knowledge on this species.
Natricidae
Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=12) (Tab. 1, Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: A common and an abundant
species widely distributed throughout the whole coun-
try but lacking from the southern part (Sterijovski et al.
2014).
New records: Asamati village (878 m), Dolna Matka
village (309 m), Mrdaja village (153 m), Pretor village
(854 m), Star Dojran (156 m), Sveti Naum (694 m).
Comments: Four of the 12 records present observations
in new quadrates. Among these records, the most sur-
prising are the observations near Dojran Lake, which
is a region with a long-term tradition of herpetological
research (for review see Sterijovski et al., 2014); only in
2010 was the occurrence of this species confirmed here
by Žagar et al. (2013).
Natrix tessellata (Laurenti, 1768) (N=8) (Tab. 1, Fig.
3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: A widespread and relatively
common species all over the country with a scattered
distribution pattern (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Crničani village (226 m), Mavrovi Anovi
village (926 m), Mrdaja village (153 m), Sofilari village
(Kriva Lakavica river) (258 m), Sveti Naum (694 m).
Comments: During the survey, a total of seven records
were made with five records in quadrates where the oc-
currence of the species was not previously known.
Colubridae
Coronella austriaca Laurenti, 1768 (N=2) (Tab. 1, Fig.
3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The smooth snake is a com-
mon species in Macedonia distributed across the coun-
try (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
Comments: We made two observations that only con-
firmed previously known species occurrence in the
north-eastern and south-western parts of the country.
Dolichophis caspius (Gmelin, 1789) (N=14) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: This is a common snake
species in Macedonia occurring throughout the country
(Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New records: Bučište village (387 m), Leskoec village
(739 m), Naselba Damjan (480 m), Rabrovo village
(344 m), Trebeništa village (725 m).
Comments: We recorded the Caspian whip snake at 14
sites; in eight quadrates we confirmed previously re-
ported observations, while five records are in new UTM
quadrates. We have observed frequent cases of road
kills in this species (53% of all finds).
Elaphe quatuorlineata (Bonnaterre, 1790) (N=3) (Tab.
1, Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The range of the four-lined
snake in Macedonia is distributed in two distinct parts;
Marcel Uhrin et al.
216
the western and the central part, with most records from
along the Vardar River valley. An additional region
lies in the Ohrid and Prespa regions, where only a few
records have been reported (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New record: Gevgelija near the Vardar River (58 m).
Comments: We recorded a new locality of the species
occurrence in the southernmost part of the Vardar River
region (Fig. 4H and 5D).
Platyceps najadum (Eichwald, 1831) (N=2) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: Platyceps najadum has
a distinct distribution in Macedonia, with most records
situated in the eastern part of the country (Sterijovski et
al., 2014).
New record: Mrzenci village (84 m).
Comments: We confirmed this species at two sites in the
south only. Mrzenci village near the Vardar River is
a new site reported from this part of the species range.
Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann, 1831) (N=1) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The cat snake is very rare
in Macedonia, being confirmed in only eight mapping
quadrates (Sterijovski et al., 2014). Records near the
Dolna Matka village represent the northern distribution
limit for the species in Macedonia.
Comments: Our record (two observations) confirmed
species occurrence near the Dolna Matka village (Tres-
ka River Gorge), where T. fallax was recorded only re-
cently in 2009 (Sterijovski et al., 2014). Probably the
range of this species is not yet fully known due to its
rarity with only occasional finds.
Zamenis longissimus (Laurenti, 1768) (N=6) (Tab. 1,
Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The Aesculapian snake be-
longs among the most common reptiles in Macedonia,
Figure 5. Localities of selected batrachofauna and herpetofauna records from Macedonia. A – Treska River Gorge near Dolna
Matka village as a habitat of Salamandra salamandra, Podarcis erhardii, Algyroides nigropunctatus and Telescopus fallax. B
– Vicinity of Dojran Lake near Nikolić village as a habitat of Lacerta viridis complex, Podarcis muralis, Pseudopus apodus and
Vipera ammodytes. C – New locality of Ablepharus kitaibelii near Trojaci village. D – New locality of Elaphe quatuorlineata
from Gevgelija.
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 217
with most of the data concentrated in the western and
northern parts of the country (Sterijovski et al., 2014).
New record: Popova Šapka (1279 m).
Comments: We recorded this species at six sites. They
well confirmed the distribution patterns of the species in
the western part of Macedonia. Our new record is from
a higher elevation in the north of the country.
Zamenis situla (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=1) (Tab. 1, Fig. 3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: According to published
data (Sterijovski et al., 2014), the range of the species
in Macedonia is limited to the region along the Vardar
river. Considering the overall species range, occurrence
in the western part of the country cannot be excluded
(cf. Sillero et al., 2014, 2015).
Comments: We recorded the leopard snake at a single
site in the Treska River Gorge (Dolna Matka village).
This observation confirmed species occurrence in the
area ten years after the last record (Sterijovski et al.,
2014).
Viperidae
Vipera ammodytes (Linnaeus, 1758) (N=6) (Tab. 1, Fig.
3)
Occurrence in Macedonia: The nose-horned viper
belongs among the most common reptile species in
Macedonia (Sterijovski et al. 2014), with a very wide
altitudinal distribution (from sea level up to more than
2,000 m) and with a peak around 400–800 m (Jelić et
al., 2013).
New record: Asamati village (878 m).
Comments: We recorded this species at six sites at alti-
tudes from 190–1,418 m; two records in new quadrate
supplement the distribution knowledge in the western
part of the country.
Conclusion
During the short field surveillance we were able to
confirm the occurrence of almost the entire batracho-
and herpetofauna of Macedonia, only seven species
were not observed (Ichthyosaura alpestris, Lissotriton
vulgaris, Rana graeca, Lacerta agilis, Hierophis gemo-
nensis, Vipera berus, and V. ursinii). On the other hand,
despite the shortness of our field work, we reported here
several significant additions and confirmations to cho-
rological data on the amphibian and reptile fauna of the
country.
New species site records are constantly being added to
the known species’ ranges, indicating that the full distri-
bution of many of them is still not sufficiently known.
Our updates on the distribution of amphibians and rep-
tiles in Macedonia showed that limits of ranges of sev-
eral species are present there (e.g. Eryx jaculus, Xero-
typhlops vermicularis) and thus the special care should
be taken to preserve their habitats. Therefore, further ef-
forts should primarily focus, in particular, on the study
of current distribution status and potential habitats of,
e.g. Emys orbicularis, Mauremys rivulata, Mediodacty-
lus kotschyi, Pseudopus apodus, Algyroides nigropunc-
tatus, Zootoca vivipara, Eryx jaculus, H. gemonensis,
Telescopus fallax, Zamenis situla and V. ursinii, which
are considered to be extremely rare reptile species of
Macedonia (Sterijovski et al., 2014). This is also true for
all amphibian species occurring in the country because
of scarcity of recent data and only limited available cur-
rent records (e.g. Sidorovska, 2010).
As shown above, several of our data confirmed the
occurrence of many species at sites where they have
never been reported before (e.g. Pelophylax ridibun-
dus, Testudo graeca, M. rivulata, M. kotschyi, Lacerta
spp., E. jaculus, Malpolon insignitus). In the case of E.
jaculus, our new record confirmed this rare species in
central Macedonia after more than forty years. Also in
some wide-spread and common species, like e.g. Lac-
erta viridis complex, M. insignitus, Natrix tessellata, we
were able to find additional new data that contributed to
filling the missing gaps in their distribution maps.
Historically, some species were recorded at single lo-
calities without subsequent confirmations (e.g. E. jacu-
lus near Skopje or T. fallax near Tetovo; Radovanović,
1964; Grillitsch and Grillitsch, 1999). The distribution
patterns of M. rivulata, P. apodus or H. gemonensis are
interesting in view of the limited records in the southern
part of the country (cf. Sterijovski et al., 2014), even
though their overall distribution in other regions of the
Balkans extends more northerly (e.g. in Croatia; see Sill-
ero et al., 2014). An explanation for this occurrence can-
not be clearly provided yet. A specific question remains
the distribution and borders of contact zones of morpho-
logically uniform species complexes detected by genet-
ics which do not allow their determination in the field
(e.g. Triturus ivanbureschi / macedonicus, Hyla arbo-
rea / orientalis, Bufo viridis / variabilis, Anguis fragilis /
graeca). We cannot precisely identify these distribution
areas here but an extensive field study in combination
with an analysis of molecular data would be necessary
for understanding the general biogeographical patterns
of batracho- and herpetofauna of Macedonia as well as
whole central Balkans.
Marcel Uhrin et al.
218
Acknowledgements. We thank Bogoljub Sterijovski (Republic
of Macedonia) and Nikolay Tzankov (Bulgaria) for their support
in our field records assessment. The work of DJ was supported by
the Comenius University grant UK/20/2014 and a grant of the Sci-
entific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic VEGA 1/0073/14.
References
Arnold, N, Ovenden, D.W. (2002): Collins field guide to the rep-
tiles and amphibians of Britain and Europe. London, Harper
Collins Publishers.
Buskirk, J.R., Keller, C., Andreu, A.C. (2001): Testudo graeca
(Linnaeus, 1758) – Maurische Landschildkröte. In: Handbuch
der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Band 3/IIIa: Schildkröten
(Testudines) I, p. 125–178. Fritz, U., Ed., Wiebelsheim, Aula
Verlag.
Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., Aleksić, I. (1999): First record of Coluber
najadum Eichwald (1831) in Serbia. Archives of Biological
Sciences 51: 47–48.
Dimovski, A. (1971): Zoocenološki istražuvanja na stepskite predeli
vo Makedonija. Godišen Zbornik Prirodno-Matematičkog
Fakulteta, Univerziteta u Skoplju, Biologija 23: 25–54.
Doflein, F. (1921): Mazedonien. Erlebnisse und Beobachtungen
eines Naturforschers im Gefolge des deutschen Heeres, Jena,
Verlag von Gustav Fischer.
Džukić, G., Beškov, V., Sidorovska, V., Cogălniceanu, D., Kalezić,
M.L. (2008): Contemporary chorology of the spadefoot toads
(Pelobates spp.) in the Balkan peninsula. Zeitschrift für
Feldherpetologie 15: 61–78.
Džukić, G., Beškov, V., Sidorovska, V., Kalezić, L.M. (2005):
Historical and contemporary ranges of the spadefoot toads
Pelobates spp. (Amphibia: Anura) in the Balkan peninsula. Acta
Zoologica Cracoviensia 48: 1–9.
Džukić, G., Kalezić, M.L. (2004): The biodiversity of amphibians
and reptiles in the Balkan peninsula. In: Balkan biodiversity.
Pattern and process in the European hotspot, p. 167–192.
Griffiths, H.I., Kryštufek, B., Reed, J.M., Ed., Dordrecht,
Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Gasc, J.-P., Cabela, A., Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., Dolmen, D.,
Grossenbacher, K., Haffner, P., Lescure, J., Martens, H.,
Martinez Rica, J.P., Maurin, H., Oliveira, M.A., Sofianidou,
T.S., Veith, M., Zuiderwijk, A. (1997): Atlas of amphibians and
reptiles in Europe [Collection Patrimoines Naturels 29], Bonn
& Paris, Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Museum National
d‘Histoire Naturelle & Service du Patrimoine Naturel.
Gaston, K.J., David, R. (1994): Hotspots across Europe.
Biodiversity Letters 2: 108–116.
Griffiths, H.I., Kryštufek, B., Reed, J.M., Eds. (2004): Balkan
biodiversity. Pattern and process in the European hotspot,
Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Grillitsch, H., Grillitsch, B. (1999): Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann,
1831) – Europäische Katzennatter. In: Handbuch der Reptilien
und Amphibien Europas. Band 3/IIa: Schlangen II Serpentes II:
Colubridae 2 (Boiginae, Natricinae), p. 757–788. Böhme, W.,
Ed., Wiebelsheim, Aula Verlag.
Gvoždík, V., Canestrelli, D., García-París, M., Moravec, J., Nascetti,
G., Recuero, E., Teixeira, J., Kotlík, P. (2015): Speciation history
and widespread introgression in the European short-call tree
frogs (Hyla arborea sensu lato, H. intermedia and H. sarda).
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83: 143–155.
Haxhiu, I. (1994): The herpetofauna of Albania. Amphibia: Species
composition, distribution, habitats. Zoologische Jahrbücher.
Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere
121: 321–334.
Haxhiu, I. (1998): The reptilia of Albania: Species composition,
distribution, habitats. Bonner zoologische Beiträge 48: 35–57.
Haxhiu, I., Oruçi, S. (2001): Current status of Testudo genus
in Albania. In: Proceedings of the international congress on
Testudo. March 7–10, 2001. Chelonii 3, p. 190–192. Anonymus,
Ed., Hyères – France.
Hedges, S.B., Marion, A.B., Lipp, K.M., Marin, J., Vidal, N.
(2014): A taxonomic framework for typhlopid snakes from the
Caribbean and other regions (Reptilia, Squamata). Caribbean
Herpetology 49: 1–61.
Hewitt, G.M. (2011): Mediterranean peninsulas: The evolution of
hotspots. In: Biodiversity hotspots, p. 123–147. Zachos, F.E. ,
Habel, J.C., Ed., Berlin Heidelberg, Springer Publishers.
Jablonski, D. (2011): Reptiles and amphibians of Albania with new
records and notes on occurrence and distribution. Acta Societatis
Zoologicae Bohemicae 75: 223–238.
Jablonski, D., Balej, P., Jůna, F., Homolka, M. (2013): Low
altitudinal distribution of Salamandra salamandra from the
balkan peninsula. Herpetology Notes 6: 563–566.
Jablonski, D., Jandzik, D., Mikulíček, P., Džukić, G., Ljubisavljević,
K., Tzankov, N., Jelić, D., Thanou, E., Moravec, J., Gvoždík, V.
(2016): Contrasting evolutionary histories of the legless lizards
slow worms (Anguis) shaped by the topography of the Balkan
Peninsula. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16: 99.
Jelić, D., Ajtić, R., Sterijovski, B., Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., Lelo,
S., Tomović, L. (2013): Distribution of the genus Vipe ra in the
western and central Balkans (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae).
Herpetozoa 25: 109–132.
Kindler, C., Böhme, W., Corti, C., Gvoždík, V., Jablonski, D.,
Jandzik, D., Metallinou, M., Široký, P., Fritz, U. (2013):
Mitochondrial phylogeography, contact zones and taxonomy
of grass snakes (Natrix natrix, N. megalocephala). Zoologica
Scripta 42: 458–472.
Král, V. (2001): [Physical geography of Europe], Praha, Academia
(in Czech).
Krizmanić, I.I. (2008): Water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in
Serbia – morphological data. Archives of Biological Sciences
60: 449–457.
Ljubisavljević, K., Džukić, G., Vukov, T.D., Kalezić, M.L. (2014):
Distribution patterns of Hermann’s tortoise Testudo hermanni
Gmelin, 1789, in the region of former Yugoslavia. Herpetozoa
26: 125–138.
Marzahn, E., Mayer, W., Joger, U., Ilgaz, Ç., Jablonski, D., Kindler,
C., Kumlutaş, Y., Nistri, A., Schneeweiß, N., Vamberger, M.,
Žagar, A., Fritz, U. (2016): Phylogeography of the Lacerta
viridis complex: mitochondrial and nuclear markers provide
taxonomic insights. Journal of Zoological Systematics and
Evolutionary Research 54: 85-105.
Melovski, L., Markovski, B., Hristovski, S., Jovanovska, D.,
Anastasovski, V., Klincharov, S., Velevski, M., Velkovski, N.,
Trendafilov, A., Matevski, V., Kostadinovski, M., Karadelev,
M., Levkov, Z. , Kolchakovski, D. (2013): Regional division of
Distribution updates to amphibian and reptile fauna for the Republic of Macedonia 219
the Republic of Macedonia for the needs of biological databases.
Macedonian Journal of Ecology and Environment 15: 81–111.
Radovanović, M. (1964): Die Verbreitung der Amphibien und
Reptilien in Jugoslawien. Senckenbergiana Biologica 45: 553–
561.
Reed, J.M., Kryštufek, B., Eastwood, W.J. (2004): The physical
geography of the balkans and nomenclatore of place names.
In: Balkan biodiversity. Pattern and process in the european
hotspot, p. 9–22. Griffiths, H., I., Kryštufek, B. , Reed, J.M.,
Ed., Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Rot-Nikćević, I., Sidorovska, V., Džukić, G., Kalezić, M.L. (2001):
Sexual size dimorphism and life history traits of two European
spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus and P. syriacus) in allopatry
and sympatry. Annales Series Historia Naturalis 11: 107–120.
Sidorovska, V. (2010): Study on assessment and evaluation of
amphibians & reptiles within the protected area National Park
Mavrovo. Skopje.
Sillero, N., Campos, J., Bonardi, A., Corti, C., Creemers, R., Crochet,
P.-A., Isailović, J.C., Denoël, M., Ficetola, G.F., Gonçalves, J.,ć,
Kuzmin, S., Lymberakis, P., De Pous, P., Rodríguez, A., Sindaco,
R., Speybroeck, J., Toxopeus, B., Vieites, D.R. , Vences, M.
(2014): Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians
and reptiles of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 35: 1–31.
Sillero, N., Oliveira, M.A., Sousa, P., Sousa, F., Gonçalves-Seco,
L. (2015): NA2RE: New Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles of
Europe. Available at: http://na2re.ismai.pt/index.html. Accessed
on January 2015.
Speybroeck, J., Beukema, W., Crochet, P.-A. (2010): A tentative
species list of the European herpetofauna (Amphibia and
Reptilia) – an update. Zootaxa 2492: 1–27.
Sterijovski, B., Tomović, L., Ajtić, R. (2014): Contribution to
the knowledge of the reptile fauna and diversity in FYR of
Macedonia. North-Western Journal of Zoology 10: 83–92.
Stöck, M., Dufresnes, C., Litvinchuk, S.N., Lymberakis, P., Biollay,
S., Berroneau, M., Borzée, A., Ghali, K., Ogielska, M., Perrin,
N. (2012): Cryptic diversity among western palearctic tree
frogs: postglacial range expansion, range limits, and secondary
contacts of three european tree frog lineages (Hyla arborea
group). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 65: 1–9.
Stöck, M., Litvinchuk, S.N., Lymberakis, P., Cogălniceanu,
D., Ogielska, M., Ghali, K., Dumas, Z., Perrin, N. (2009):
Distribution and secondary contacts of amphibians in Greece and
eastern Europe – similarities and differences of phylogeographic
patterns in green toads (Bufo viridis subgroup) and tree frogs
(Hyla arborea group). In: 11th ICZEGAR Abstracts. International
Congress on the Zoogeography, Ecology and Evolution of
Eastern Mediterranean. 21–25 september 2009, Herakleion,
Crete, Greece, p. 81–82. Poulakakis, N. , Vardinoyannis, K., Ed.,
Hellenic Zoological Society.
Stojanov, A., Tzankov, N. , Naumov, B. (2011): Die Amphibien und
Reptilien Bulgariens, Frankfurt am Main, Edition Chimaira.
Tomović, L., Ajtić, R., Ljubisavljević, K., Urošević, A., Jović, D.,
Krizmanić, I., Labus, N., Đorđević, S., Kalezić, M.L., Vukov, T.
(2014): Reptiles in Serbia. Distribution and diversity patterns.
Bulletin of the Natural History Museum 7: 129–158.
Valakos, E.D., Pafilis, P., Sotiropoulos, K., Lymberakis, P.,
Maragou, P. , Foufopoulos, J. (2008): The amphibians and
reptiles of Greece. Frankfurt am Main, Edition Chimaira.
Vukov, T., Kalezić, M.L., Tomović, L., Krizmanić, I., Jović, D.,
Labus, N., Džukić, G. (2013): Amphibians in Serbia: distribution
and diversity patterns. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum
6: 90–112.
Vukov, T.D., Džukić, G., Lelo, S., Borkin, L.J., Litvinchuk, S.N.,
Kalezić, M.L. (2006): Morphometrics of the yellow-bellied toad
(Bombina variegata) in the central Balkans: implications for
taxonomy and zoogeography. Zoological Studies 45: 213–222.
Wielstra, B., Litvinchuk, S.N., Naumov, B., Tzankov, N., Arntzen,
J.W. (2013): A revised taxonomy of crested newts in the Triturus
karelinii group (Amphibia: Caudata: Salamandridae), with the
description of a new species. Zootaxa 3682: 441–453.
Wielstra, B., Sillero, N., Vörös, J., Arntzen, J.W. (2014): The
distribution of the crested and marbled newt species (Amphibia:
Salamandridae: Triturus) – an addition to the new atlas of
amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 35:
376–381.
Žagar, A., Cafuta, V., Drašler, K., Jagar, T., Krofel, M., Lužnik,
M., Ostanek, E., Petkovska, V., Planinc, G., Sopotnik, M.,
Vamberger, M. (2013): A review of eleven short-term reptile
surveys in the western Balkans. Hyla 2013: 3–21.
Accepted by Anamarija Zagar
Marcel Uhrin et al.
220
... In North Macedonia, T. g. ibera occurs mainly along the Strumica and Vardar valleys: Skopje, Štip, Katlanovo, Kalkovo, Gevgelija (Karaman 1928) and scattered in other parts of the country, although being less abundant than T. hermanni (Sterijovski et al. 2014;Uhrin et al. 2016;Arsovski and Sterijovski 2019). The species occurs at low elevations (155-211 m) in North Macedonia (Uhrin et al. 2016). ...
... In North Macedonia, T. g. ibera occurs mainly along the Strumica and Vardar valleys: Skopje, Štip, Katlanovo, Kalkovo, Gevgelija (Karaman 1928) and scattered in other parts of the country, although being less abundant than T. hermanni (Sterijovski et al. 2014;Uhrin et al. 2016;Arsovski and Sterijovski 2019). The species occurs at low elevations (155-211 m) in North Macedonia (Uhrin et al. 2016). ...
... In North Macedonia, T. g. ibera occurs mainly along the Strumica and Vardar valleys: Skopje, Štip, Katlanovo, Kalkovo, Gevgelija (Karaman 1928) and scattered in other parts of the country, although being less abundant than T. hermanni (Sterijovski et al. 2014;Uhrin et al. 2016;Arsovski and Sterijovski 2019). The species occurs at low elevations (155-211 m) in North Macedonia (Uhrin et al. 2016). ...
... In North Macedonia, T. g. ibera occurs mainly along the Strumica and Vardar valleys: Skopje, Štip, Katlanovo, Kalkovo, Gevgelija (Karaman 1928) and scattered in other parts of the country, although being less abundant than T. hermanni (Sterijovski et al. 2014;Uhrin et al. 2016;Arsovski and Sterijovski 2019). The species occurs at low elevations (155-211 m) in North Macedonia (Uhrin et al. 2016). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The eastern clades of the Spur-thighed Tortoise, Testudo graeca (Family Testudinidae),include small to medium-sized (maximum straightline carapace lengths [SCL] typically < 35.8 cm, but possibly up to 46.0 cm) tortoise subspecies clades native to the Balkans (southeastern Europe) and southwestern Asia. Within this vast geographic distribution, the species occupies Mediterranean, Mediterranean-continental, and steppe climates, as well as the margins of hot deserts. In southeastern Turkey and Iran, it reaches elevations of 2500 m, the record for the species. Testudo graeca is characterized by the presence of a small conical keratinous spur on each posterior thigh, present in all eastern clade subspecies. The eastern clades show a very high degree of phenotypic variability, ranging from almost entirely black individuals (typically, but not exclusively in the north of its range) to yellowish (flavistic) individuals (primarily in southern Israel). They also show variability in the structure and shape of the carapace, ranging from flatter steppe forms to domed, highershelled forms. Adult females are generally slightly larger and heavier than males in most eastern clade populations; however, in approximately a quarter of surveyed populations across the range, males reach a similar or larger average size. Female mean SCLs range from 14.5–21.9 cm per population, with mean body mass of 700 g; male mean SCLs range from 13.6–24.1 cm with mean body mass of 420 g. Other male dimorphic characters are similar to the western clade, including a proportionally longer and thicker tail and plastral concavity. Females produce 1–3 clutches of 2–19 eggs annually between May and July. The species is still relatively common and widespread in a large part of its range. Some populations have declined drastically since the second half of the 20th century (as in Azerbaijan) and in others this decline has accelerated more recently, mainly in southwestern Russia, Armenia, and in the coastal regions of Israel. The main threat to the eastern subspecies clades of T. graeca is the degradation and loss of habitats by urbanization, bush fires, and agricultural mechanization, while the legal collection for the international pet trade, especially to Europe, is currently much more regulated than in previous decades.
... The cryptic lifestyle of the species in combination with few mainland surveys justifies its sparse records in Greece and other countries of its range. In recent years, with the increase of professional and amateur herpetologists, naturalists and wildlife photographers there has been an increase in Eryx jaculus records both in new and old locations (Covaciu-Marcov et al. 2012, Gholamifard et al. 2012, Afsar et al. 2013, Pulev et al. 2014, Aloufi & Amr 2015, Insacco et al. 2015, Sahlean et al. 2015, Roussos 2016, Uhrin et al. 2016, Mizsei et al. 2017, Rosso et al. 2018, Christopoulos et al. 2019, Christopoulos & Kotselis 2021. The distribution of herpetofauna in mainland Greece remains lacking, as in many areas has never been diligent surveyed, and records of their presence in such areas are opportunistic (Pafilis & Maragou 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Due to its cryptic lifestyle, the Eryx jaculus is hard to detect, as a result of which is absence from many expected areas. In recent years in Greece, it has been found in several new locations, thus covering many of its distribution gaps. In this study we present for the first time the presence of the species in the prefectures of Phthiotis and Magnesia, with 12 and 1 records respectively. In addition, we considered important to give a description of the habitats in which the specimens were found, contributing to the knowledge of its habitat preference, due the species is not a fully studied in Greece.
... Taking into account that the surface of the territory of this province is only 10887 km 2 , we can say that with 14 species, the diversity of amphibians is very high. For example, the same number of amphibian species inhabits 2.5 times larger area of the Republic of North Macedonia (Uhrin et al. 2016). The species richness of the Kosovo and Metohija Province is undoubtedly the result of environmental heterogeneity with favourable abiotic and biotic conditions for amphibians. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study provides the first comprehensive review of the amphibian distribution and diversity patterns in the Kosovo and Metohija Province, Serbia. Unpublished observations were combined with published records and museum data to produce updated and detailed distribution maps of individual species. Our results show that the diversity of amphibians is very high, with 14 species inhabiting the Kosovo and Meto-hija Province. The most widespread species inhabiting around 40% of Kosovo and Metohija Province are Salamandra salamandra, Bombina variegata and Pelophylax esculentus complex. Rare species are Bufo bufo, Rana graeca, Rana temporaria and Triturus macedonicus (found at 10-20% of studied area), while Salamandra atra has extremely limited distribution (less than 5% of studied area). Based on updated distribution maps, we conclude that the distribution of many amphibian species may still be underestimated and further studies are necessary, especially for the Metohija area. Maintaining up-to-date and realistic geographical distribution maps of individual species is crucial for assessing and updating the conservation status of species and populations. Data presented in this study are crucial for the ultimate goal: protection of unique and sensitive amphibian species of the Kosovo and Metohija Province.
... Apart from the lack of mainland surveys, the elusive nature of the javelin sand boa may account for the rarity of encounters. Numerous recent new records from Greece(Roussos, 2016;Rosso et al., 2018) and other countries within the historical distribution of the species(Sahlean et al., 2015;Uhrin ...
... Other regions not included in our study that could also represent cold range edges are those located at high altitudes. High altitudinal populations of L. viridis are located in the central and southern parts of the species' range, in the Balkan Peninsula from southern Rumania to northern Anatolia (Pafilis & Maragou, 2013;Schmidtler, 1986;Uhrin et al., 2016). Although this regions are characterized either as subtropical or transitional subtropicaltemperate climatic zones (Nojarov, 2017), it is possible that climatic conditions at high altitudes, as well as an expected narrower range of habitats available, have the same effect on the niche size of L. viridis as the conditions in temperate peripheries. ...
Article
Full-text available
The available range of habitats and suitable abiotic conditions like temperature and radiation tends to be narrower toward the periphery of the distribution range of species. Peripheral populations of generalist species could then be more specialized and have a smaller and differentiated realized niche (habitat niche in our study) compared to populations at the core. Likewise, patterns of microhabitat selection can differ between periphery and core. In our study, we compared niche size and microhabitat selection among core (Bulgaria) and northern peripheral (Germany, Czech Republic) populations of Lacerta viridis and estimated niche differentiation among regions. We collected data on vegetation structure and abiotic parameters at the microhabitat scale in each region. In order to compare niche size among regions and estimate niche differentiation, we built multidimensional niche hypervolumes. We applied generalized linear mixed models and model averaging, accounting for spatial autocorrelation when necessary, to analyze microhabitat differences among regions and microhabitat selection in each region. Peripheral populations were more specialized, having a smaller niche than core ones, and their niche differed from that in the core (Sørensen overlap in all comparisons <0.3). Microhabitats at the periphery had lower radiation and soil compaction and less structured vegetation. Microhabitat selection at the core depended solely on abiotic parameters, while at the periphery it was defined by only vegetation structure (Czech Republic) or a combination of both, vegetation structure, and abiotic factors (Germany). Thus, peripheral populations seem to compensate for overall harsher climatic conditions by responding to different parameters of the microhabitat compared to core populations. We suggest specific conservation measures for L. virids in each studied region and point out the general implications of a higher specialization degree of peripheral populations in relation to climate change and habitat fragmentation.
Article
Full-text available
The first Aegean wall lizard, Podarcis erhardii, documented on Paros Island, Cyclades, Greece
Article
Full-text available
New record of Eryx jaculus (Squamata: Boidae) from northern Evros Prefecture, Thrace, the northernmost sighting in Greece
Article
Full-text available
The northernmost population of the Balkan wall lizards, Podarcis tauricus (Pallas, 1814) was recently discovered in the Czech Republic. We studied genetic variability in a mitochondrial marker cytochrome b to shed light on the origin of this remote population. We detected three unique haplotypes, close to those occurring in the populations of Podarcis tauricus from central/north Balkans and Hungary. Our data exclude the hypothesis of a single founder (a randomly or intentionally introduced pregnant female or her progeny) of the Czech population and indicate a native, autochthonous origin of the population or recent introduction/range expansion. Rehák I, Fischer D, Kratochvíl L, Rovatsos M (2022) Origin and haplotype diversity of the northernmost population of Podarcis tauricus (Squamata, Lacertidae): Do lizards respond to climate change and go north? Biodiversity Data Journal 10: e82156.
Article
Full-text available
Background Genetic architecture of a species is a result of historical changes in population size and extent of distribution related to climatic and environmental factors and contemporary processes of dispersal and gene flow. Population-size and range contractions, expansions and shifts have a substantial effect on genetic diversity and intraspecific divergence, which is further shaped by gene-flow limiting barriers. The Balkans, as one of the most important sources of European biodiversity, is a region where many temperate species persisted during the Pleistocene glaciations and where high topographic heterogeneity offers suitable conditions for local adaptations of populations. In this study, we investigated the phylogeographical patterns and demographic histories of four species of semifossorial slow-worm lizards (genus Anguis) present in the Balkan Peninsula, and tested the relationship between genetic diversity and topographic heterogeneity of the inhabited ranges. Results We inferred phylogenetic relationships, compared genetic structure and historical demography of slow worms using nucleotide sequence variation of mitochondrial DNA. Four Anguis species with mostly parapatric distributions occur in the Balkan Peninsula. They show different levels of genetic diversity. A signature of population growth was detected in all four species but with various courses in particular populations. We found a strong correlation between genetic diversity of slow-worm populations and topographic ruggedness of the ranges (mountain systems) they inhabit. Areas with more rugged terrain harbour higher genetic diversity. Conclusions Phylogeographical pattern of the genus Anguis in the Balkans is concordant with the refugia-within-refugia model previously proposed for both several other taxa in the region and other main European Peninsulas. While slow-worm populations from the southern refugia mostly have restricted distributions and have not dispersed much from their refugial areas, populations from the extra-Mediterranean refugia in northern parts of the Balkans have colonized vast areas of eastern, central, and western Europe. Besides climatic historical events, the heterogeneous topography of the Balkans has also played an important role in shaping genetic diversity of slow worms. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0669-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Article
Full-text available
Based upon data from our own investigations and known chorological data sources, we present locality data (toponymy, elevation and source) of spadefoot toads (Pelobates fascus and P. syriacus) distribution from the Balkan Peninsula region and adjacent areas. It is an attempt to develop the first accessible database on the present and historical records of spadefoot toads distributions in this part of Europe. We also analysed patterns of their elevation data. Spadefoot toads have much larger altitudinal ranges in the Balkans than was previously thought. The spadefoot toads are generally lowland amphibians in the Balkans, with a significant inverse correlation between presence and increasing altitude for both species, though in some parts these toads can be encountered in relatively high altitude habitats.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Although reptile fauna of FYR of Macedonia (FYROM) was the matter of interest since more than a century, detailed distributions of most of the species are still missing. According to published data, 32 reptile species inhabit FYROM. In this paper, detailed distribution data of reptile species in FYROM are presented. Research of herpetofauna of FYROM was conducted from 1999 until 2012 and included 393 localities. For 32 recorded reptile species, exact localities and altitudes, as well as published records are given. Analyses of the reptile diversity of the FYROM showed that the regions with the highest species diversity are: the Prespa and Ohrid Lake Region, Skopje region, Veles region and the Dojran Lake Region, with 18-21 reptile species per UTM 10 x 10 squares. These regions should be considered for the future designation of important herpetological areas at national level. Results of comparative analysis of reptile faunas from all Balkan countries showed that Macedonian fauna is the most similar with Albanian (92.537) and Bulgarian (90.909) reptile faunas. Zoogeographic analysis showed that reptile fauna of FYROM consists of eight chorotypes in total, the most dominant chorotype being the Eastern-Mediterranean with 13 species, followed by the Turano-Mediterranean with six and Southern-European with five species. Detailed distribution data of this study could be basis for future action plans, protection and conservation measures of reptiles in FYROM, and should be implemented in the national legislation and acts. In addition, this data are imperative for the Red Data Book of reptilians and designation of the Important Herpetological Areas in the country.
Chapter
Full-text available
The complexity of Balkan physical geography, together with its location in an important transition zone of faunal and floral influences, will have influenced greatly the evolution of Balkan biodiversity. This chapter gives a broad description of the geology, topography and climate of the Balkan Peninsula which serves as a reference point for subsequent specialist chapters on the biodiversity of the Balkan flora and fauna. Since some of the geographic boundaries of the Balkans are not well demarcated the chapter begins with a discussion of how the territory is defined. For the international audience, it includes a brief summary of the nomenclature used for geographic features whose names vary locally.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper we present confirmed and potential distribution ranges of all native Serbian reptile species. The information provided herein presents the combination of the newly collected faunistic data and previously published records. The centres of reptilian diversity in Serbia were evaluated, in order to focus future conservation efforts on the regions of particular importance for the protection of this understudied group of animals. We found four main centres of species richness: three in Metohija and one in Šumadija, with 17–21 species per 50 × 50 km square. Analysis of the similarity of species composition in different regions of Serbia showed that South-eastern Serbia is the most distinct from other regions of Serbia, due to high number of Mediterranean species, with two being found exclusively in that region (E. quatuorlineata and P. najadum). Metohija is also very distinct, due to the highest number of species and significant number of specific (Mediterranean) faunal elements. The remaining geographic regions are grouped into three clusters, with Kosovo-Southern Serbia cluster being especially distinct in the terms of species richness and the presence of Mediterranean species. We also compared Serbian herpetofauna with those in other Balkan countries, considering species’ numbers and zoogeographic herpetofaunistic elements. Serbian herpetofauna is closest to the Romanian. Zoogeographic analysis showed that reptilian fauna of Serbia consists of eight chorotypes, with the Eastern-Mediterranean (nine species) and Southern-European (five species) as the most dominant ones.
Book
Balkan Biodiversity is the first attempt to synthesise our current understanding of biodiversity in the great European hot spot. The conservation of biodiversity is one of today’s great ecological challenges but Balkan biodiversity is still poorly understood, in a region with complex physical geography and a long history of political conflict. The Balkans exhibit outstanding levels of endemism, particularly in caves and ancient lakes such as Ohrid; lying at the crossroads of Europe and Asia they are also renowned as a focus of Pleistocene glacial refugia. This volume unites a diverse group of international researchers for the first time. Its interdisciplinary approach gives a broad perspective on biodiversity at the level of the gene, species and ecosystem, including contributions on temporal change. Biological groups include plants, mammals, spiders and humans, cave-dwelling organisms, fish, aquatic invertebrates and algae. The book should be read by zoologists, botanists, speleobiologists, palaeoecologists, palaeolimnologists and environmental scientists.
Chapter
On a national scale, electoral geography allows us to refine and spatialize the behaviors studied by electoral sociology, whose samples generally prove insufficiently representative at regional and local levels. It allows us to bring in additional hypotheses to explain the relationships between voting behaviors and the social, cultural, ideological, and economic features of the regions, even if it constantly requires being careful about improper interpretations of the correlations in terms of explanatory relationships. In the field of electoral geography, a relevant analysis always requires a good knowledge of the overall historical and social background.
Article
The distribution of Hermann's Tortoise Testudo hermanni GMELIN, 1789, in the territory of former Yugoslavia was reviewed based on the records published since the end of the 19th century and the authors' observations. Although anthropogenic translocation of tortoises evidently occurred along the Adriatic coast, some populations in the northern parts of the Adriatic could be relicts of an originally continuous distribution.
Article
Based on broad, nearly rangewide sampling, we reanalysed the phylogeography of the Lacerta viridis complex using the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and the intron 7 of the nuclear β-fibrinogen gene. Using the mitochondrial marker, we identified in phylogenetic analyses 10 terminal clades clustering in four deeply divergent main lineages whose relationships are weakly resolved. These lineages correspond to Lacerta bilineata, L. viridis, the previously identified Adriatic or West Balkan lineage and a newly discovered fourth lineage from the Anatolian Black Sea coast and the south-eastern Balkan Peninsula. Except for the latter lineage, there is considerable phylogeographic structuring in each lineage, with higher diversity in the south of the distribution ranges. This pattern indicates the existence of two distinct microrefugia in the Italian Peninsula and Sicily and of up to seven microrefugia in the Balkan Peninsula, but of only one refugium along the Black Sea coast of Anatolia. We identified secondary contact zones of the main lineages and of terminal clades within these lineages. However, most of the formerly described putative contact zone of L. bilineata and L. viridis turned out to be a contact zone between the Adriatic lineage and L. viridis, but L. bilineata seems to be involved only marginally. Our nuclear marker could not unambiguously resolve whether there is gene flow in contact zones. Thus, further research is necessary to decide whether the four main lineages are conspecific or whether they represent distinct biological species. We restrict the name L. v. meridionalis to the newly identified genetic lineage from Turkey and south-eastern Europe, synonymize some previously recognized taxa and suggest a tentative nomenclature for the L. viridis complex.