Content uploaded by Daniel Cordaro
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Daniel Cordaro on Sep 16, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Contentment: Perceived Completeness Across Cultures and Traditions
Daniel T. Cordaro and Marc Brackett
Yale University Lauren Glass
Loyola Marymount University
Craig L. Anderson
University of California, Berkeley
Over the past 2 decades, a major focus in psychological research has been on pursuing happiness,
positivity, and optimal human flourishing. Interestingly, little attention has been paid to contentment,
which, according to over 4,000 years of spiritual, philosophical, and theoretical discourse, is an emotion
that sits at the deepest core of human wellbeing and is foundational to the experience of fulfillment in
life. This article synthesizes etymological, religious, philosophical, and psychological treatments of
contentment from multiple languages and traditions. Derived from these perspectives, it also presents a
prototype approach to contentment, its core affect features and cross-cultural variations. Finally, it
presents theory-grounded hypotheses intended to initiate future research on the topic. We propose a
primary appraisal theme that is at the root of all experiences of contentment: perceived completeness,
which refers to the perception that the present situation is enough and entire.
Keywords: contentment, happiness, positive psychology, wellbeing, emotion
“With the rise of contentment, the purity of one’s heart blooms.
The contented person who possesses nothing owns the world.”
—Vasistha’s Yoga, II:15,16.
Ryokan, an old Zen Master, lived the simplest possible life in a
small wooden hut at the foot of a mountain. He had exactly what
he needed, and nothing more—a roof over his head, a river a short
distance away, and the bounty of the forest in his backyard. One
evening when the moon was full and bright, the old man was out
collecting water when a thief approached from a nearby village.
While searching the house and finding nothing to steal, the thief
was too distracted to hear the old man approaching. Ryokan found
the thief rummaging and said, “You have traveled far to see me,
and you should not return empty-handed. Please, accept my robe
as a gift.” The thief was bewildered, but he accepted the old man’s
clothes and ran off. Ryokan sat naked, looking at the night sky and
thought, “I wish I could have given him this beautiful moon.” (B.
Watson, 1992).
At the heart of human wellbeing is a peaceful emotion, content-
ment, which has been the subject of intense philosophical, spiri-
tual, and scientific debate for millennia (Gaskins, 1999;Saunders,
1966). Contentment can be felt toward pleasant experiences (e.g.,
stepping into a warm bath, enjoying the sun), unpleasant experi-
ences (e.g., losing a loved one, falling short of a goal), or as with
Ryokan, about life itself. Contentment also is a key component of
our overall satisfaction with life (Shiota, Keltner, & John, 2006;
Reps & Senzaki, 1998), which raises foundational questions about
the nature of what it means to be well: Why are some people
contented with so little, while others are miserable with so much?
What does it feel like to unconditionally accept the present mo-
ment, regardless of pleasant or unpleasant circumstances? Is true
and lasting contentment a real possibility in life, or is it just the
rhetoric from religious and philosophical legends? Does content-
ment mean we have given up on life, or can we accomplish our
goals and pursue our passions while accepting the entire journey
along the way?
Approaches to Wellbeing and Emotion
For the past 15 years, the field of positive psychology has sought
to understand and cultivate positive emotions, character traits, and
institutions, and in doing so has focused primarily on one partic-
ular positive emotion, happiness, which has become the mascot for
most of what is good and meaningful in life (Easterlin, 2006;
Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, & Schkade, 2005). Since the inception of
positive psychology (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) over
3,500 scholarly articles and 16,000 books have featured the word
“happiness” in their titles (search.proquest.com; amazon.com).
More recently, research in emotion psychology has turned to a
much broader array of positive states than have previously been
studied. These include: amusement (Hejmadi, Davidson, & Rozin,
2000;Keltner & Bonanno, 1997;Keltner & Shiota, 2003;Shiota,
Campos, & Keltner, 2003); awe (Hejmadi et al., 2000;Shiota et
al., 2003;Shiota, Keltner, & Mossman, 2007); coyness (Bretherton
& Ainsworth, 1974;Reddy, 2000); desire (Gonzaga, Turner, Kelt-
ner, Campos, & Altemus, 2006;Keltner & Shiota, 2003); gratitude
(Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2006); interest (Keltner & Shiota, 2003;
Daniel T. Cordaro and Marc Brackett, Department of Psychology, Yale
University; Lauren Glass, Department of Psychology & Philosophy,
Loyola Marymount University; Craig L. Anderson, Department of Psy-
chology, University of California, Berkeley.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Daniel T.
Cordaro, Department of Psychology, Yale Center for Emotional Intelli-
gence, Yale University, 340 Edwards Street, New Haven, CT 06511.
E-mail: daniel.cordaro@yale.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Review of General Psychology © 2016 American Psychological Association
2016, Vol. 20, No. 3, 221–235 1089-2680/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000082
221
Reeve, 1993;Silvia, 2008); pride (Tracy & Robins, 2004); and
triumph (Matsumoto & Hwang, 2012). One common feature in the
recent trend of studying positive states, however, is that most
are high-arousal emotions (Keltner & Lerner, 2010) that activate
the central nervous system as opposed to relaxing it. At present,
there is a dearth of research on positive states that are lower in
arousal such as contentment, peace, tranquility, and satisfaction,
with some notable exceptions reviewed herein.
This review relies, in part, on an appraisal theory of emotion,
which assumes that affective states are defined by their core
appraisal themes that emerge during moments of evaluating our
current circumstances (Han, Lerner, & Keltner, 2007;Ovies,
Horberg, & Keltner, 2010). According to the appraisal approach,
unique emotions give rise to unique influences on social cognition,
perspective, and decision-making (Ellsworth & Scherer, 2003),
which in turn defines the experience of the emotion (Lazarus,
1991;Smith & Ellsworth, 1985). For example, a central appraisal
theme for fear would be the perception of a threat (Ekman &
Cordaro, 2011), and the central appraisal theme for pride would be
the perception of a high sense of self-worth (Tracy & Robins,
2004). To set the stage for our discussion of contentment across
cultures and traditions, we begin with the central appraisal theme
for contentment as the perception of completeness in the present
moment.
Moving forward with this theme, this article explores the psy-
chology of contentment through several linguistic, cultural, phil-
osophical, and scientific perspectives, resulting in a central theme
and common etymological interpretation of contentment spanning
multiple disciplines and traditions. Second, contentment is exam-
ined using the prototype approach, which highlights common
themes, features, and components of the felt experiences of con-
tentment (Fehr & Russell, 1984;Keltner & Haidt, 2003). Content-
ment is also explored through appraisal themes or antecedent
conditions that are consistent with many felt experiences of the
emotion (Ellsworth, & Scherer, 2003;Scherer, Schorr, & John-
stone, 2001), as well as its core affect experience, described as a
function of valence and activation, which distinguishes content-
ment from other related states such as happiness, pride, triumph,
and elation (Russell & Barrett, 1999). Lastly, we identify key areas
of research and their relationship to the emotion contentment to
facilitate future research in the area.
Perceived Completeness
While not well-studied in psychology, contentment has been at
the heart of philosophical discourse for over 4,000 years (Vente-
godt, Andersen, & Merrick, 2003). A synthesis of linguistic, reli-
gious, philosophical, and scientific theories reveals several com-
mon features, appraisals, and variations of contentment. Across
cultures and disciplines, one main appraisal theme is what Sinnott
and Berlanstein (2006)—and a host of philosophers across time
and tradition—describe as a sense of completeness, which is
central to feeling connected to the self and others. Sinnott and
Berlanstein (2006) argue that a sense of completeness encom-
passes a basic psychological need for integrating all of the rich and
complex information in our environment into a holistic, meaning-
ful narrative. When we reject the present experience, thoughts of
incompleteness arise, causing psychological suffering. For exam-
ple, going through breakup can challenge our sense of innate
completeness, because of such thought patterns such as: “I have
been rejected;” “I’m not worthy;” and “I’m not good enough.”
Pleasant situations can sometimes challenge our sense of innate
completeness, especially when we depend on hedonic pleasure as
a contingency of well-being. The first bite of a warm chocolate
cake might be blissful, but with each subsequent bite we become
more and more tired of sweets. If we were to cling to the bliss of
that first bite, the rest of the cake (and future cakes compared with
this one) might leave us disappointed and underwhelmed. Accord-
ing to this perspective, psychological suffering arises when we
believe that our innate completeness is contingent on something
other than what is being experienced in the present moment. When
we unconditionally accept the present experience, a feeling of
completeness, and subsequently the emotion contentment, arises.
According to Sinnott and Berlanstein (2006), attributions of
completeness, therefore, predict the extent to which we have
developed a healthy and accepting relationship with the stories we
weave about our world; it reflects one’s ability to routinely and
unconditionally accept all aspects of the self—both positive and
negative. In this regard, experiences of completeness and the
resulting emotion contentment, also appear to promote temporal
orientation to the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 2003) as well as an
increased sense of holistic wellbeing (Diener, 2000;Ryan & Deci,
2000;Ryff, 1989). These latter two features of contentment are
likely outcomes of perceived completeness, since this attribution
requires an appreciation for what exists in the present moment
without ruminating over past experiences (Nolen-Hoeksema,
2000) or worrying over future possibilities (Mathews, 1990). We
will further elaborate on contentment and the attribution of com-
pleteness as we explore the linguistic, philosophical, religious, and
psychological contexts surrounding these theories.
Etymology, Meanings, and Early
Treatments of Contentment
When communicating complex emotional states, we are bound
by the labels available to us, as well as the context surrounding the
experience (Barrett, 2004;Frijda, Markam, Sato, & Wiers, 1995;
Frijda, 1993). In the West, an emotion is typically represented in
a single word, but languages in other cultures may lack the related
term or use terms or phrases that have no direct translations in
English (Heider, 2006;Russell, 1991). An example of this relevant
to contentment is the Dutch word uitbuiken, which literally means
“to belly out” (Ekman & Cordaro, 2011). More colloquially,
uitbuiken refers to the feeling of satisfaction that one feels in one’s
stomach after finishing a delicious meal. The fact that it takes 15
words to translate uitbuiken into English does not mean that this
feeling is exclusive to the Dutch-speaking world, but rather it
illustrates the rich complexity of translating emotion terms across
language traditions. To begin understanding the linguistic roots
and modern interpretations of contentment, a brief selection of
translations and etymologies is provided, as well as an overview of
common themes across these translations. Woven within these
language traditions is a brief historical account of how the word
“contentment” has come into its modern interpretation. We argue
that across linguistic and philosophical traditions, attributions of
completeness covary with felt experiences of contentment.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
222 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
Santosha in Sanskrit and Hindi
One of the earliest mainstream treatments of contentment ap-
pears in the Bhagavad Gita, a 700-verse Sanskrit scripture written
between the 5th and 2nd century BCE that comprises 18 chapters
in the Bhishma Parva of the Hindu epic Mahabharata (Swami,
1983). In the Gita, two powerful royal families stand on the
battlefield, ready to wage war over control of the kingdom of
Kuru. Arjuna, a warrior for one of the families, refuses to lead his
troops to march on the enemy, which is comprised of his relatives
and beloved teachers. Upon asking the heavens for guidance,
Krishna, a form of the god Vishnu, intervenes by teaching Arjuna
the inner workings of consciousness, the universe, and santosha
(divine contentment, see Banavathy & Choudry, 2014):
“One who revels only in the universal essence, and is content [san-
tosha] in the universal essence, no duty exists for him” (III.17);
“Contentment in whatever comes of its own accord, transcending
duality, free from envy, balanced in success and in failure, he is not
bound to karma even when performing actions” (IV.22); and “To
whom praise and insult are same, who is silent, content with anything,
who is without a home, with unwavering mind, a person who is such
a devotee is dear to me.” (XII.19)
The use of santosha in the Gita implies a sense of equanimity,
completeness, and unconditional acceptance of the workings of the
universe. Krishna explains that one who understands the true,
complete self feels a permanent sense of wellbeing and mental
clarity regardless of whether the experience is pleasant or unpleas-
ant. At the conclusion of the Gita, Arjuna realizes santosha,is
freed from all earthly desires, and acts to fulfill his destiny as a
warrior: “By your grace, my delusion is gone; and I have gained
recognition of myself. I remain as one from whom all doubts have
gone” (XVIII.73).
A variation on santoshta appears in Patañjali’s Yoga Su
tras,
which are comprised of 196 sacred Sanskrit aphorisms compiled
around 400 CE that constitute the foundational text of Ashtanga
(Raja) Yoga. In the Yoga Su
tras, Patañjali compiles what are
known as and still practiced as the five Niyamas, or observances
that relate to enlightenment: Yama (purity), Tapas (austerity),
Svadhyaya (study), Ishvarapranidhana (divine surrender), and
Santosha (contentment). Patañjali writes, “As a result of content-
ment [santosha], there is purity of mind, one-pointedness, control
of the senses, and fitness for the vision of the self. Supreme
wellbeing is gained through contentment.” (Patañjali, 1990, pp.
2.41–42). In most translations of the Yoga Su
tras, santosha is
considered a divine state of peace, completeness, and equanimi-
ty—an indestructible sense of wellbeing that cannot be shaken
even as one experiences the extremes of pleasure and pain. Pata-
ñjali suggests that true and lasting contentment arises when one
has calmed the restlessness and reactive nature of the mind
(2.33–34).
Finally, one of the clearest and most precise treatments of
contentment in the ancient Sanskrit texts comes from Vasistha’s
Yoga, a 32,000 verse masterpiece purportedly written by the sage
Valmiki to explain the illusory nature of the manifest world. It is
a major compilation of nondual wisdom, incorporating traditions
from the Advaita Vedanta philosophy and various Yogic traditions
(Venkatesananda, 2010). It highlights various anecdotes, narra-
tives, and metaphors that aim toward understanding the true nature
of reality.
At the very start of Vasistha’s discourse, we learn the pillars of
enlightenment, which are described as four virtues that are para-
mount to liberation. In what might be the most direct description
of contentment as an emotion of self-completeness regardless of
external circumstances, Vasistha explains to Rama the path to
liberation:
Rama, there are four gatekeepers at the entrance to the realm of
Freedom. They are self-control, spirit of enquiry, contentment [san-
tosha], and company of the wise. . . . What is contentment? To
renounce all craving for what is not obtained and to accept what
comes unsought, without being elated or depressed even by them—
this is contentment. As long as one is not satisfied in the self, he will
be subjected to sorrow. (II:11, 15, 16)
Dzongkha and Tibetan
In any discussion of contentment, attention must be given to two
Buddhist cultures that value this emotion above and beyond all
others—Tibet and Bhutan. There are two major themes of con-
tentment in the national language of Bhutan (Dzongkha) and its
root language (Tibetan), which separately handle the sensations for
physical satisfaction and psychological contentment. Dzongkha
tsham tshey and Tibetan ngoms pa are similar in meaning, as they
describe the feeling of physical satisfaction, such as a sense of
fullness after a meal or the sensory pleasure of stepping into a
warm bath after a long day. In a physical sense, Dzongkha tsham
tshey is also used to limit excessive behaviors involving the
physical body, such as overeating or drinking too much rice wine.
Similar in meaning to the Sanskrit santosha is the Tibetan chog
shes, which serves as the root for the Dzongkha chog she. These
both literally translate to “knowledge of completeness” or “know-
ing what is enough.” This Buddhist construct suggests that through
practical knowledge of what it means to feel complete in life, one
can find peace and a sense of wellness regardless of the situation.
Instead of seeking contentment through excess, the emotions chog
shes/chog she embody a feeling of “enoughness” with regards to
whatever one already has or is. Chog shes/Chog she can be quite
practical in that it prescribes a lifestyle that avoids excess, appre-
ciates the present moment, and aims to balance work, family,
friends, and social duties. It is also used to describe more spiritual
dimensions of completeness, similar to what a long-term meditator
may feel when experiencing a glimpse of liberation. The Dzong-
kha translations of the scriptures, which detail the life and teach-
ings of Gautama Buddha, summarize the contentment experience
as: “Chog She Pa Nyi Norgi Chog”—“Contentment is the greatest
wealth”(Carter, 2000).
Hebrew, Arabic, and Greek
In Judaic, Christian, and Islamic scriptures, one of the most
important Semitic root words is Š-L-M (shalam; Shin-Lamedh-
Mem), meaning “complete, intact, well;” literally translated,
Š-L-M indicates safety, but figuratively Š-L-M refers to whole-
ness. Stemming from the Semitic root Š-L-M are Hebrew shalom,
Aramaic shlam, and Arabic Salam, all central to common greetings
and blessings for peace and contentment on several levels—phys-
ical, mental, and spiritual. Š-L-M is more than just political peace,
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
223
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS
the absence of war—it is a sense of deep and unshakable wellbeing
resulting from completeness in life. Shalom, according to the
Jewish sages, is the very purpose of the Torah: “All that is written
in the Torah was written for the sake of peace (shalom)” (Handel-
man, 2008, p. 25). Š-L-M is also the root of the word “Islam” via
‘aslama, meaning “voluntary submission to God”: “Whomsoever
God desires to guide, He opens his heart to Islam” (Qur’an, 6:125).
The Qur’an also directly references the emotion contentment via
Arabic Rida when describing the nature of the relationship be-
tween God and God’s creations: “God has contentment with them,
and they have contentment with God” (5:119; 9:100; 98:8). This
latter passage appears three times throughout the scriptures, lend-
ing to the importance of reciprocal unconditional acceptance be-
tween God and everything in God’s universe.
Furthermore, the Greek eiréné, which is the translation of sha-
lom used in the New Testament of the Bible, evolved from the root
eiro
, meaning “to join together into a whole”: “Peace (Eiréné)I
leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the
world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be
afraid” (John 14:27). In the New Testament alone, 62 of the 260
chapters contain at least one reference to eiréné, making it one of
the most commonly used emotions in the Bible (Strong, 1995). We
also see the apostle Timothy directly referencing the importance of
this sense of fundamental completeness: “Godliness with content-
ment is great gain, for we brought nothing into the world, and we
cannot take anything out of the world” (Timothy, 6:5–8; The New
English Bible; New Testament, 1961).
It is interesting that common translations for shalom,Salam, and
eiréné typically focus on “peace,” but historically their meanings
were likely much more rich and complex. Far more than just the
absence of conflict, these words embody a deep inner contentment,
a feeling of personal and social wellbeing (Swinton, 1997). Fur-
thermore, these concepts are fundamental to the religious traditions
they represent, as they allow for a direct connection with the
divine.
Latin and English
The modern English word “contentment” is derived from Old
French contenter via Latin continere (v.), meaning “to hold to-
gether” or “that which is contained.” This root describes something
whole, complete, and intact—the contents of something—and not
just a simple feeling of satisfaction. The word continere later
evolved into a term meant to describe a person who felt whole,
complete, and intact: contentus. More specifically, someone who
feels contentus has no desires beyond what exists in the present
moment; they are whole, fully contained (Klein, 1966;Weekley,
2012).
Unique Linguistic Distinctions in English
In colloquial English, contentment is often used interchangeably
with other emotion terms, both positive (e.g., satisfied, happy, and
pleased) and negative (e.g., complacent, indifferent, and relaxed);
however, the attribution of unconditional completeness regardless
of circumstance distinguishes contentment from these states. In a
broader simplification of this distinction, contentment refers to the
quality of having enough, whereas happiness, ecstasy, joy, glee,
gladness, and satisfaction extend into situations of gaining more or
experiencing something desirable. Contentment is an emotion that
uniquely provides a sense of acceptance and completeness regard-
less of whether the situation may be desirable or undesirable. For
example, we can feel contentment in the fully accepted passing of
a loved one. Sadness may also be present in this situation, but we
can feel complete in our sadness as we understand that grieving is
an important and natural part of processing the loss. Another way
of experiencing contentment is by releasing our cravings or desires
for pleasant experiences. As Vasistha’s Yoga advises: “The con-
tented person who possesses nothing owns the world” (II: 15,16).
The underrepresentation of contentment in modern language is
due largely to the fact that “happiness” and “joy” have been used
throughout various popular theories as blanket terms meant to
cover the wide spectrum of pleasant states (Ekman, Davidson, &
Friesen, 1990;D. Gilbert, 2007;M. E. Seligman, 2004). Content-
ment is occasionally, and often incorrectly, used as a synonym for
some negative states like complacency: “His cooking had im-
proved, but there were no grounds for him to feel content,”
resignation: “I’ve decided to just be content with this inevitable
failure,” indifference: “They were too content with how things
were to care about anything,” or judgments of laziness: “She could
have been much more in life, but she was too contented to have
any motivation at all.” These alternate uses reflect cultural values
driven by competition, individual achievement, and strong con-
cepts of “winner” and “best”—and where caring for others and
cultivating quality of life are less important (Hofstede, 1984,
2003).
Western Philosophical Treatments of Contentment
One of the most ancient and important struggles in the history of
our species regards the understanding and cultivation of wellbeing
for self, family, and community. A central aim of scientific,
spiritual, and political traditions has been to promote and protect
sources of wellness. Contentment figures prominently in these
philosophical discussions on what it means to live “the good life.”
There have been more philosophies related to the human condition
than can be covered here; a selection of some of the more foun-
dational teachings is presented below, including critical interpre-
tations on how each advances the present discussion on content-
ment.
Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Diogenes of Sincope
There is a long and complex history of discourse on human
wellness from Greek philosophy, which begins with the notion that
wellbeing equates to hedonism, or pleasure-seeking. Democritus is
interpreted as advocating for a sort of enlightened hedonism,
where the good of mankind is an internal state of mind, rather than
anything external. Democritus is credited as being the first known
philosopher to make a single aim the guiding principle for deciding
one’s actions. This aim is eudaimonia, “well-being of spirit,” or
euthymia, best translated as “contentment” (Thomas, 1965; T35,
T36, F7, F8). He developed the term euthymein (v.), which denotes
being cheerful in misfortune and was later used by Aristotle. As
described in his treatise On Contentment (Peri euthymiés), con-
tentment is available through the actualization of an individual’s
“own power (dynamis) and nature (physis)” (Fragment B3), which
requires moderation and acquisition only of “what is necessary”
(Fragment B285).
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
224 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
The philosopher Epicurus later argued that a good life is
achieved through the enjoyment of one’s life in its entirety. This
involves pleasure, which is not debauchery, but simply the expe-
rience of life. Moderation is a crucial component of this kind of
enjoyment. Similar to the aforementioned Tibetan concept of chog
shes (“knowledge of what is enough”), the Epicurean ideals were
practical standards for understanding moderation and the harmful
consequences of excess; simple pleasures leading to a contented
life were to be maximized, but pleasures leading to increased
desires and fears were to be avoided: “Don’t spoil what you have
by desiring what you don’t have; but remember that what you now
have was once among the things you only hoped for” (Chang,
2006).
Finally, no discussion of Greek contentment philosophy can be
without Diogenes of Sinope, a contemporary of Aristotle who
lived deliberately in poverty, taking only an empty wine barrel for
shelter. Diogenes gave away his begging bowl because, inspired
by dogs drinking peacefully at the river, he realized that he could
also drink from the river using only his hands. As a radical
departure from both the hedonistic and eudaimonic perspectives,
Diogenes famously said: “He has the most who is most content
with the least” (Thomas, 1965).
It is said that Diogenes’ philosophy of contentment reached
Alexander the Great’s ears. The curious conqueror walked down to
the river to find Diogenes naked, lying peacefully in the sun.
Alexander said, “Ask me any favor, and I will grant it,” to which
Diogenes replied, “Stand a little less between me and the sun”
(Dryden, 2004). Diogenes told the most powerful man in the world
to step out of his way, making their unlikely meeting and brief
dialogue the stuff of contentment legend. As philosopher Charles
Caleb Colton summarized of Diogenes’ philosophy of wellbeing,
“True contentment depends not upon what we have; a tub was
large enough for Diogenes, but a world was too little for Alexan-
der” (J. H. Gilbert, 1895, p. 161). Diogenes’ philosophy aimed for
freedom from all desires whatsoever—freedom from the desire for
pleasures prescribed by the hedonic perspective, as well as free-
dom from the desire for grand life goals as prescribed by some
within the eudaimonic perspective. Though Diogenes may repre-
sent an extreme form of austerity, it is a powerful proposition that
there are two distinctly different ways to satisfy all of our desires:
(a) strive to fulfill them all, or (b) eliminate them entirely.
Daoist and Zen Philosophy
One of the most influential East Asian philosophical texts is the
Tao Te Ching, a collection of 81 brief, cryptic poems written
between the sixth and 4th century BCE, presumably by an enlight-
ened scholar known as Laozi. As one of the fundamental Taoist
texts, the Tao Te Ching has had immense impact on Eastern
thought and culture, particularly in Confucianism and Chinese
Buddhism. Several of the most well-regarded translators of this
text agree that Chapters 44 and 46 regard the nature of contentment
(Goddard, 2008;Tze, 1974,1997). Laozi writes, “Great desire
incurs great expense, and great riches incur great fear, but con-
tentment comes at no cost; Who knows when to stop, does not
continue into danger, and so may long endure” (Merel, 2010). Two
chapters later, he continues, “. . . There is no calamity greater than
desire, no greater misery than discontent, no fault greater than
greed. Therefore, contentment alone is enough” (Merel, 2010).
Laozi’s philosophy advances our discussion by treating the state of
“no desires” as equivalent to the emotion contentment and the
concept of completeness. Furthermore, the discourse highlights the
connection between “having” and the emotion “fear,” because
identification with desires necessitates a fear or anxiety toward not
attaining them, or toward maintaining them once they are
achieved.
Related to the work of Laozi, the teachings of Zen Buddhism
suggest that the realization of contentment does not come from
adding more to what already exists, such as gaining more status,
titles, money, achievements, acceptance, friends, and so forth
Instead, Zen philosophy teaches that contentment is realized only
by systematically removing all additions we have made to what
already is; this requires releasing all attachment to our desires and
identities, and removing psychological barriers constructed by the
ego, the sense of “I.”
The Zen masters teach that if we can reduce our perception of
reality to pure experience of the present moment, we can feel an
unshakable, fundamental contentment. Zen teachings also describe
that non-fully enlightened beings can catch glimpses of fundamen-
tal contentment through meditation, life simplification, and atten-
tion to and appreciation of the present moment (Suzuki, 1961).
Puritan Philosophy
Thomas Watson, a 17th century Puritan preacher and philoso-
pher, based his entire life and work on a single Biblical verse from
John the Apostle: “I am not saying this because I am in need, for
I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances” (Phil.
4:11). Watson taught that dissatisfaction with God’s creation was
a sinful perspective, and in light of this he wrote the book The Art
of Divine Contentment, which is an exposition exclusively of Phil.
4:11. The Art of Divine Contentment explains that as one compli-
cates life through accumulating material possessions, one moves
away from God; simplifying life through the cessation of desires
and eliminating possessions brings one closer to God (T. Watson,
1829, Sect. VIII).
Watson advances the approach to contentment by providing a
Western link to Eastern Philosophy through his argument that true
contentment involves eliminating desires, not fulfilling them; once
desires cease, wellbeing exists regardless of whatever emotional
states, thoughts, or situations arise:
Contentment is the manna that is laid up in the ark of a good
conscience....When thoughts begin to arise, and the heart is
disquieted, conscience saith to a man, as the king did to Nehemia,
‘why is thy countenance sad?...hast not thou a treasure that thou
canst never be plundered of?’ (Sect. XIV, rule 4)
Taken together, these philosophical traditions speak to the im-
portance of the emotion contentment as a primary realization
objective toward attaining sustainable wellbeing. Some of the most
influential texts in human history, which represent many of the
world’s major spiritual and secular traditions, discuss contentment
as a fundamental emotional state to be understood and cultivated
with respect to wellness. Only a small fraction of these traditions
are discussed here, with a majority of them treating contentment as
a peaceful state of being involving an experience of completeness
with regard to the present state of things. These traditions also
discuss what contentment is not—usually contrasting it with de-
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
225
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS
sire, greed, and excessive behaviors. More important, philosophi-
cal treatments of contentment point to this emotion as stemming
from attributions of “having enough,” as opposed to “having or
wanting more.”
Contentment in Psychology
Here, we briefly review research in psychology relevant to the
emotion contentment and present a theoretical framework of con-
tentment drawing from the prototype, appraisal, and core affect
models of emotion. Also provided are descriptions of content-
ment’s many variations and common themes derived from previ-
ous works. We conclude with suggestions for future lines of
research to help build a more holistic understanding of content-
ment as an emotion.
Research on Contentment
While there is a dearth of psychological research on content-
ment as an emotion, sufficient evidence exists to support its
appraisal theme, completeness, as well as to distinguish content-
ment from related emotions and nonaffective states. One likely
reason for the paucity of literature on contentment is that happiness
and joy have dominated the field as blanket terms used to describe
a broader array of pleasant states, such as pleasure, relief, accom-
plishment, amusement, and contentment (see Ekman, Davidson, &
Friesen, 1990). Another possible explanation is that early, influ-
ential work on emotional expression largely hypothesized that all
positive states—usually referred to collectively as happiness or
joyfulness—shared the same expression, the Duchenne smile,
marked by upturned lip corners, raised cheeks, and contracted
areas around the outer and sometimes inner eyes (Ekman &
Friesen, 1982). Recent studies, however, have indicated that there
may be more nuanced, distinguishable expressions for positive
emotional states like contentment (e.g., Cordaro, Keltner, Tsher-
ing, Wangchuk, & Flynn, 2016). What little research exists on
contentment has focused on physiology, expression, and cultural
interpretations, with some formal comparisons to other positive
states, like happiness.
Contentment Is a Low Arousal State
Many emotion researchers hold that emotions are related to
distinct goals and require equally distinct physiological responses,
reflected in autonomic nervous system activity (Stemmler, 2004,
2009). Kreibig (2010), for example, reviewed the autonomic ner-
vous system responses reported for 16 emotions, including eight
positive states of which contentment was one, and found that there
are distinct physiological differences between induced content-
ment states versus induced happiness states. Contentment, accord-
ing to Kreibig’s (2010) findings, was correlated with decreases in
heart rate, skin conductance, and several additional relaxation
responses. Happiness, on the other hand, showed distinct increases
in cardiac activity, blood pressure, respiration, and other excitation
responses. These findings are consistent with Johnstone and Scher-
er’s (1999) research on acoustic properties of different emotions;
people experiencing contentment had more relaxed speech produc-
tion and lower rates of articulation as compared to the controls; in
contrast, happiness produced increases in speech production and
rates of articulation. In summary, contentment differs from happi-
ness and related states by way of low physiological arousal and
relaxation responses.
Contentment and Ideal Affect
The differences between happiness and contentment are further
reflected in Lu’s (2001) cross-cultural review outlining the differ-
ences between the understanding of happiness and contentment in
Western versus Eastern cultures. According to his cross-cultural
review, Lu found that the concept of contentment in Chinese
colloquial linguistics was equated with the concept of accepting
“whatever one has at the moment, and naturally feeling moved and
touched from the bottom of one’s heart.” This finding is strongly
consistent with the appraisal of completeness. He further argues
that Western culture generally links wellbeing to high-arousal
states like happiness, where Eastern cultures perceive wellbeing as
more consistent with low-arousal states like, contentment, peace,
and tranquility.
These cultural differences are further investigated in Tsai,
Louie, Chen, and Uchida’s (2007) study of ideal affect in chil-
dren’s storybooks across American and Taiwanese preschoolers.
European American preschool children had strong preferences for
storybooks that portrayed mostly exciting positive states, while
Taiwanese preschool children preferred storybooks portraying
mostly calm/contented positive states. Additionally, Tsai et al.
(2007) coded the facial expressions of the characters in best-selling
American and Taiwanese storybooks and found significantly more
high-arousal positive expressions in the American books, whereas
they found more low-arousal positive expressions, including con-
tentment, in the Taiwanese bestsellers.
More nuanced experiments have uncovered that within one
culture, individual differences also exist for preferences for hap-
piness versus contentment. Diener (2000) reported that for a sam-
ple of American participants, satisfaction with life varied as an
interaction between sensation-seeking and high versus low arousal
positive emotions. According to one study, individuals high in
sensation seeking were most satisfied when they experienced
high-arousal positive emotions like happiness and excitement. In
contrast, low-sensation seekers were most satisfied when they
experienced low-arousal positive emotions like contentment.
Contentment as a Discrete Emotion
Extending Diener’s (2000) work on the experiences of content-
ment, Fredrickson’s (2001) conceptual review of the role of pos-
itive emotions in the broaden-and-build theory treats contentment
as a discrete emotion. The broaden-and-build theory captures how
certain discrete positive emotions broaden thought-action tenden-
cies and allow for building physical, intellectual, social, and psy-
chological resources (Fredrickson, 1998). For example, happiness
promotes playfulness and creativity, interest promotes exploration
and self-expansion, love promotes relationship building, and so on.
Fredrickson (2001) argues that contentment “broadens by creating
the urge to savor current life circumstances and integrate these
circumstances into new views of self and of the world.” Further-
more, she posits that contentment and related positive states are not
simply urges to savor and enjoy, but rather they represent distin-
guishable, deeply programmed behaviors that are fundamental to
physical survival.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
226 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
In one study, Fredrickson and Branigan (2005) support the
broaden-and-build theory with respect to amusement and content-
ment. Participants watched videos designed to prime amusement,
contentment, neutrality, anger, and anxiety—emotions that repre-
sent the wide spectra of valence and activation. The independently
primed participants were asked to list what they would like to do
right then, given what they were feeling; those in both the amuse-
ment and contentment conditions reported more possibilities in
what they would like to do in that moment as compared with the
neutral and negative conditions. Fredrickson and Branigan con-
clude that despite clear differences in phenomenology and degrees
of pleasantness and activation between amusement and content-
ment, the two emotions equally broadened participants’ thought-
action repertoire compared with the neutral/negative states. The
broaden-and-build theory explains that contentment, like other
positive emotions, broadens awareness and encourages novelty,
exploration, and skill-building. In her review of positive emotions,
Fredrickson (1998) described contentment as an emotion that
follows flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990), when “one feels more
together than before, not only internally but also with respect to
other people and to the world in general.” This perspective is
highly consistent with the proposed appraisal theme of perceived
completeness.
Beyond the broaden-and-build approach, what kinds of adaptive
tendencies might contentment promote from an evolutionary per-
spective? Jackson (2002) proposed an evolutionary argument for
contentment as an adaptive buffer against excessive consumption
and selfishness. He argued that the current western economic
model does not support ecological sustainability, which is a main
reason why materialism and consumerism are negatively corre-
lated with contentment and wellbeing. From an evolutionary per-
spective, pleasures are simply evolved processes that support suc-
cessful genetic strategies (Hamilton, 1972), but our current
socioeconomic structure is not aligned with the psychosocial con-
ditions in which our species evolved to flourish (Nesse, 1999;
Wright, 1995). Contentment, and its appraisal of completeness,
can be viewed as a kind of barometer for the extent to which we
are producing social, psychological, and environmental structures
that sustain global wellness.
Extending the work on nonverbal expressions of positive states,
an experiment by Hejmadi, Davidson, and Rozin (2000) explored
a facial expression of contentment inspired by an ancient Indian
text called Natyashastra, written by Bharata in the 2nd century
CE. The Natyashastra details a theory of acting, emotion, stage
preparation, and performance execution and has been an endur-
ingly influential work in Indian performing arts throughout the
centuries. Included in it are nuanced and sophisticated descrip-
tions of the attributions, qualities, and expressions of nearly 40
emotional states, including the well-studied western emotions
anger, joy, sadness, surprise, fear, and disgust. On contentment,
the Natyashastra says:
Contentment...istoberepresented on the stage by consequents such
as enjoyment of objects gained, and not grumbling over objects
unattained, partially enjoyed, lost, and the like. Contentment arising
from spiritual knowledge, purity, wealth, and power, is always to be
represented on the stage by an absence of fear, sorrow, and sadness.
When one enjoys attained objects such as sound, touch, taste, form,
and smell, and is not sorry over their non-attainment, one is said to
have contentment. (Guptacharya, 1971)
In their cross-cultural study, Hejmadi et al., (2000) presented
Indian and American college students with video recordings of
dynamic facial/postural expressions of 10 emotions—including
peace/contentment—described in Natyashastra. Two conditions
compared recognition ratings in a forced-choice format versus a
free-response format, both of which yielded above-chance ratings
for all emotions. The excellent performance of the stimuli in
conveying emotion concepts to Western and non-Western observ-
ers extended in particular into the positive emotions not usually
represented in Western taxonomies, like contentment.
In a more recent series of studies, Cordaro et al. (2016) pre-
sented simple, one-sentence stories that induced discrete emotions
in participants from China, India, Japan, South Korea, and the
United States. The participants were asked to freely produce non-
verbal expressions that would capture the emotion in the story. A
team trained in the Facial Action Coding System (Ekman, Friesen,
& Hager, 1978) coded all 2,500 expressions and analyzed them for
cross-cultural and within-cultural patterns. According to their find-
ings, contentment expressions had three universal characteristics
(smile, eyelids drooping, and audible/visible deep breath in and
out), and it also distinguished itself from the other 12 positive
emotions and 11 negative emotions that were investigated.
In a follow-up investigation, Keltner & Cordaro (2016) pre-
sented static photos of 17 different emotions to participants in
China, Japan, India, South Korea, New Zealand, Poland, Pakistan,
Germany, Turkey, and the United States. Participants were asked
to read one sentence emotion stories and choose the photograph
that best matched the emotion concept conveyed in the story.
Across these cultures, contentment was one of the 14 facial ex-
pressions that were recognized at above-chance levels. Further-
more, when presented with both happiness and contented expres-
sions, participants reliably distinguished between the two using the
story-matching paradigm.
Lastly, Cordaro et al. (2016) performed an 11-culture expression
recognition experiment using vocal bursts of emotions, defined as
nonlinguistic sounds. Using the same narratives as in their previ-
ous works, the study presented simple emotion stories to partici-
pants in 10 industrialized nations and one remote culture in Bhu-
tan. The participants were asked to match the stories to one of three
vocal bursts. Of the 17 emotions investigated, 13 were universally
recognized, including the vocal expression for contentment. These
studies, when taken together, indicate that the contentment emo-
tion concept is generally understood across a wide range of cul-
tures, including those without any contact with the globalized
world. They also importantly indicate that there may be universal
and multimodal expressions of contentment, a requirement for
considering contentment as an emotion.
Does contentment hold up to the rigorous definitions of an
emotion? Ekman and Cordaro (2011) describe 13 criteria for an
emotion, which include: (a) distinctive expression; (b) distinctive
physiology; (c) automatic appraisal; (d) distinctive antecedent
events; (e) presence in other primates; (f) quick onset; (g) can be
brief in duration; (h) automatic occurrence; (i) distinctive thought
patterns; (j) distinctive subjective experience; (k) refractory period
filters information to what supports the emotion; (l) unconstrained
target; and (m) can be enacted in either a constructive or destruc-
tive fashion. In validating an emotion construct for contentment,
future research must answer the question: which of these criteria
apply to contentment and related states? First, we hypothesize that
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
227
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS
the criteria for expression, physiology, appraisal, duration, refrac-
tory period, and antecedent events are fulfilled for contentment
such that it is distinguishable from other, well-studied and related
emotional states like happiness, joy, pride, awe, and so forth.
Similarly, it will be important to ascertain whether contentment
can be reliably elicited and measured using physiological, behav-
ioral, and self-report methods. Based on our etymological and
linguistic review, we expect that the criteria for distinctive thought
patterns, experiences, targets, and ways of enacting contentment
would hold consistent patterns across cultures and linguistic
boundaries, as well as notable within-culture differences. Cross-
cultural and linguistics research that ascertains the differences and
similarities in emotion language, stories, experience, and expres-
sion would be well-suited to test these criteria (see Elfenbein &
Ambady, 2002).
The remaining three criteria: presence in other primates, quick
onset, and automatic occurrence are not as clearly related to
contentment, which would be informed by further research that
compares physiological contentment responses for humans and
other primates with responses for more well-studied related states,
such as excitement and sensory pleasure (e.g., Fessler & Gervais,
2010).
Perceived Completeness and Motivation
What motivates us to achieve desired outcomes is an enduring
and important line of work in modern psychology, because it
extends into work on satisfaction with life (Deci & Ryan, 1985),
1985), psychological wellbeing (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi,
2002), and development of social relationships (Vygotsky, 1978).
If contentment arises because of minimized desires, how can it be
consistent with achievement and growth in life beyond simplified
evolutionary tendencies? Gaskins (1999) disentangles this illusory
paradox, as he uses a unique contentment-focused perspective to
illustrate the benefits of a Zen Buddhist approach to achieving
goals.
Gaskins (1999) argues that there are fundamental differences
between Western constructs of motivation and those found in Zen
philosophy, and that there is opportunity for the latter to augment
the former. Both theories hold that people are motivated to realize
contentment and wellbeing, and both also hold that we do so by
attaining valued goals such as autonomy, competence, relatedness,
and so forth. The critical difference between Western and Zen
philosophies, according to Gaskins, is that wellbeing can be cul-
tivated in two distinct ways: (a) the actualization of a “self”
(Western), or (b) the realization of no self (Zen, Vedic, etc.). These
two pathways both provide opportunities to cultivate a sense of
contentment, but do so through two completely different means.
Western motivation theories are fundamentally focused on achiev-
ing a contented state by developing and cultivating a strong sense
of self, which is contingent upon achieving all valued goals. For
example, when we feel completeness through our many accom-
plishments, contentment may arise. From this perspective, con-
tentment cannot arise until the desires are met (e.g., Alexander the
Great).
Zen philosophy, on the other hand, is focused not on fulfilling
desires, but rather on systematically eliminating them to cultivate
an indestructible sense of completeness (e.g., Diogenes, Ryokan,
and Vasistha). Gaskins explains that from this perspective, con-
tentment arises when we release our cravings and fears, thereby
removing the desires that preclude the possibility for contentment
to arise. In this sense, motivation is not externally driven by desire
fulfillment, but rather intrinsically driven by curiosity, inspiration,
and passion.
Prototype Approach
According to the discrete emotion perspective (Izard, 1993), a
foundational feature of emotional experiences is that they can be
distinguished from one another via central themes called proto-
types (Fehr & Russell, 1984;Shaver, Schwartz, Kirson, &
O’Connor, 1987). Prototypical instances of an emotion are rare in
day-to-day experiences, yet it is nonetheless informative to high-
light the theoretical features of an emotion that may distinguish it
from similar states. Emotion prototypes also serve as important
theoretical foundations for operationalizing emotion variables in
the laboratory setting (Gross & Thompson, 2007).
An emotion prototype approach typically specifies components
and themes of the emotion that are related to intentional objects
and attributions. For example, a prototype theme of fear might be
“perceived threat.” When the intentional object—whether a bear, a
rollercoaster, or a shadow in the closet—is perceived to pose a
physical danger, the prototypical emotion fear arises. Related to
fear is the emotion awe, which Keltner and Haidt (2003) distin-
guish from fear using a prototype approach. They describe two
themes present in prototypical awe, which involve an intentional
object that is perceived to be “vast” (big) and “needing accommo-
dation” (mind-blowing). They describe that awe can have a flavor
of fear, such as when witnessing a volcanic eruption, an event that
would be perceived as vast, needing accommodation, and threat-
ening. Awe can also be experienced without fear, such as seeing a
double rainbow all the way across the sky, an event that would be
perceived as vast, needing accommodation, and not threatening.
Other prototypical emotion themes include loss (sadness; Bo-
nanno, 2009), having one’s goals blocked (anger; Ekman & Cor-
daro, 2011), and attaining a high sense of self-worth (pride; Tracy
& Robins, 2007).
What, then, is the prototypical theme of contentment? After
reviewing a wide range of linguistic, philosophical, and scientific
perspectives, perceived completeness arises as a consistent the-
matic appraisal of contentment across cultures and traditions.
Completeness refers to a state where an intentional object such as
the self, aspects of one’s life, or the sum of all existence is
perceived to be whole and entire, regardless of whether the present
experience is pleasant or unpleasant. Completeness can come in
many forms, from finishing a work of art to sitting back and
enjoying the end of a great meal; from accepting failure to accept-
ing the death of a loved one. The theme of completeness offers a
sense of fundamentally having and being enough, without reacting
to the current experience with rejection and judgment.
Sinnott and Berlanstein (2006) describe a sense of completeness
or “wholeness” as central to feeling connected with others and
concepts larger than the self. The sense of completeness encom-
passes a basic psychological need and intrinsic motivation for
integrating information from the world into one holistic narrative.
Most critically, the feelings of completeness also relate to our
sense of place within the global narrative we piece together.
Failure to integrate cognitive representations of the world leads to
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
228 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
a perception of fragmented identity, increased conflict, and general
dissatisfaction with life. These states of fragmentation, according
to Sinnott and Berlanstein:
. . . leave the person with sadness and a yearning to reweave the web
of life, to dance the dance of life in some more coherent way. But to
participate happily in our modern version of village circle dances, we
need three things. We need to feel mastery of many steps, to feel
connected to other dancers in the circle, and to be in connection with
the overall pattern that the dance represents. (p. 385)
Individuals who develop a unified self-perception tend to feel a
sense of place in the world, are able to maintain stronger social
connections, and benefit from healthier psychological growth. A
sense of completeness, according to Sinnott and Berlanstein
(2006), is related to cognitive maturation, in particular one’s
ability to routinely and unconditionally accept all aspects of the
self—both positive and negative.
Core Affect Approach
Where the prototype approach handles such features as attribu-
tion, thematic content, antecedent events, and intentional objects,
the core affect approach attempts to describe the raw, subjective
feeling of emotion that arises from neurophysiological changes
(Russell & Barrett, 1999). The two most widely used, irreducible
dimensions are pleasure and (physiological) activation, which
together describe an appreciable amount of variance in the expe-
rience of different emotional states (Russell, Weiss, & Mendel-
sohn, 1989).
Contentment is certainly a pleasurable state, but linguistically it
is distant from the extremes of states like jubilation, ecstasy,
serenity, and bliss. Based on the evidence in this review, it is
suspected that contentment would fall just beyond neutral on the
pleasant side of the dimension, near related states such as satis-
faction, calmness, peacefulness, and so forth. Similarly, content-
ment is physiologically dissimilar from high-activation positive
states like enthusiasm, triumph, and excitement. Empirical and
linguistic evidence described herein suggests that contentment is a
lower-activation state that feels subjectively similar to the arousal
levels of being relaxed, at-ease, and peaceful (Kreibig, 2010).
Comparison of Related States
In any theoretical review of an emotion, it is important to
compare the conceptual similarities and differences of closely
related emotions and states (Keltner & Haidt, 2003). In the fol-
lowing comparison, we rely on Ekman’s (1992) consideration of
emotion families, as well as Posner, Russell, and Peterson’s (2005)
circumplex model of affect. Both of these models assume that
states vary according to similar groups or families. For example,
joy, elation, ecstasy, and bliss belong to the happiness family of
emotions, according to Ekman’s model. Another example is that
calm, gratitude, hope, contentment, and satisfaction would belong
to the same grouping of states (low arousal, pleasant) according to
Russel’s model. Table 1 summarizes 11 emotions or states that are
broadly related to contentment, but have key differentiating fea-
tures.
The evidence across traditions provided by this review high-
lights perceived completeness as the central appraisal theme for
contentment. Because contentment is a low-arousal, pleasant emo-
tion, other states may appear similar but are likely fundamentally
different for several reasons. Some emotion concepts are used
colloquially as synonymous with contentment, such as calm,sat-
isfied,peaceful, and tranquil. Other emotions may be experienced
concurrently with contentment, and so the concepts have been
entangled—such as with happiness,joy,gratitude, and hope.
Lastly, some nonaffective states are occasionally mistaken for
contentment, because they share some similarities with perceived
completeness—humility and self-acceptance.
Calm is a quality of an emotion, but not an emotion. Picard,
Vyzas, and Healey (2001) equated calmness with the lowest ex-
treme of their arousal axis for the physiological measurement of
emotions.
Satisfaction is a well-studied concept in the wellbeing and
emotion literature, and is also generally not considered an emotion
as it has no well-defined antecedent. In one of the most robust
Table 1
States Related to Contentment and How They are Distinguished From Contentment
State Description/appraisal Differentiation Reference
Calm Blanket term for low psychophysiological
arousal
Calm is emotion aspecific; contentment is likely an
emotion or emotion-like state
Picard, Vyzas, and Healey
(2001)
Gratitude Pleasant feelings about perceived benefits Contentment does not require a focus on benefits Emmons and McCullough
(2004)
Happiness Blanket term for high-arousal positive affect Contentment is a specific low-arousal positive state Fredrickson (1998)
Hope Belief that something positive could
materialize
Contentment is present-moment focused and independent
of future beliefs
Lazarus (1999)
Humility Modest or low view of one’s significance Contentment is a nonjudgmental sense of completeness
and does not necessitate modesty
Exline and Geyer (2004)
Joy Higher arousal version of happiness Contentment is a low-arousal pleasant state Fredrickson (1998)
Satisfaction Extent to which desires and expectations are
fulfilled
Contentment can be present even when expectations are
not fulfilled
Diener, Emmons, Larsen,
and Griffin (1985)
Self-acceptance Positive evaluations of oneself and one’s
past
Contentment can be present only when self-judgments
cease and self-acceptance becomes unconditional
Ryff and Keyes (1995)
Peace Absence of disturbances Contentment can be present along with external
disturbances and disruptions
De Rivera and Páez (2007)
Tranquility Pleasant inactivity in body and mind Contentment can be present during physiological exertion Ellsworth and Smith (1988)
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
229
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS
series of studies on wellbeing across the life span, Diener, Em-
mons, Larsen, and Griffin (1985) elaborated on the meaning of
satisfaction as it relates to the human experience. They broadly
define satisfaction as the extent to which desires and expectations
are filled, which critically separates satisfaction from contentment,
which can be present with missed expectations and unfulfilled
desires.
Peaceful is one of the most broadly used synonyms for content-
ment in the philosophical and spiritual literature. Similar to satis-
faction, the concept of peace has no well-defined antecedent.
Peace is a broadly defined state that requires the absence of
disturbances (De Rivera & Páez, 2007), which is why it is used to
describe time periods where conflict and war are not present.
While peace and contentment are likely to coexist in more calm
situations, we can nevertheless feel contentment even in the pres-
ence of a chaotic environment, or when unpleasant situations arise.
Tranquility is a less-well studied affective state in the literature,
but Ellsworth and Smith (1988) defined tranquility as a pleasant
inactivity in the body and mind (see also Fredrickson, 1998).
While tranquility requires sedation, contentment is not so. We can
feel contentment while engaging in flow states, which do not
necessitate sedation (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Happiness and Joy are widely considered to be emotions, but
they tend to be used as catch-all categories for positive emotion in
the literature (see Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Further-
more, joy is typically referenced as a more intense form of hap-
piness (Fredrickson, 1998). Some theorists have argued that hap-
piness and joy have specific antecedent conditions, such as gaining
something new or anticipatory enthusiasm (Ekman & Cordaro,
2011;Shiota et al., 2011). Even so, contentment differs in arousal,
expression, and the perception of completeness.
Gratitude is an emotion that has seen increased attention in
emotion psychology as of late, as it has important implications in
wellbeing and prosocial interaction (Williams & Bartlett, 2015).
While gratitude requires a focus on the benefits or positive qual-
ities of different circumstances, contentment requires the complete
acceptance of the circumstances, regardless of perceived benefit or
deficit.
Hope has been studied in emotion theory and counseling con-
texts (Lazarus, 1999;Snyder, 1995), and is generally defined as a
belief that something positive could manifest in the future. Hope
is, by definition, a future-oriented emotion that requires a full or
partial expectation of what is to come. Contentment, on the other
hand, is only concerned with feeling complete with whatever is
presently happening.
Humility is a nonaffective quality that is embodied by the
enlightened masters and some folk heroes. Exline and Geyer
(2004) studied humility as a “modest or low view of one’s signif-
icance.” These works identify humility as a type of self-restraint
from excessive hubris or narcissism, which may lead to content-
ment but is not equivalent to contentment. Contentment is a
nonjudgmental sense of completeness and does not necessitate
modesty.
Self-acceptance, like humility, is a nonaffective quality that is
similar to, but distinctly different from contentment. Ryff and
Keyes refer to self-acceptance as a positive evaluation of the self
and one’s past behaviors, and in contrast contentment is a non-
judgmental state of accepting all current experiences, whether or
not they are directly related to the psychological self.
Researching Contentment
In this section we synthesize the perspectives of contentment
across disciplines, incorporate the theoretical work that has been
conducted on contentment thus far, and suggest three major lines
of research for future work in this area.
Contentment, Wellbeing, and Life Satisfaction
In positive psychology, discussions about contentment have
been few with respect to studies of wellbeing, though related
constructs appear in the subjective wellbeing and psychological
wellbeing literature (Gable & Haidt, 2005;Ryan & Deci, 2000).
These fields of research concern themselves with optimal human
experiences and functioning through two main philosophical per-
spectives: hedonism and eudemonism. It appears self-evident that
contentment may be closely related to both forms of wellbeing, but
how and to what extent? Since hedonism and eudemonism encom-
pass distinctly different views about the nature of wellbeing, they
will also likely relate to contentment in unique ways.
According to the hedonic perspective, wellbeing is defined as
maximizing pleasure while minimizing pain (Kubovy, 1999).
Through the lens of hedonism, wellbeing has been conceptualized
in many ways, ranging from broad definitions of pleasurable
bodily sensations to more specific interpretations of individual
self-interests, goals, and motivations (Lucas & Diener, 2009).
Across these interpretations, proponents of this perspective largely
treat hedonism and wellbeing as equivalent (Kahneman, Diener, &
Schwarz, 1999), and as such, wellbeing and contentment are
related but inequivalent. For one, contentment is an emotion or an
emotion-like state, while pleasure/wellbeing are broader sensa-
tional experiences that can incorporate a wide range of positive
emotions. From this perspective, a felt experience of contentment
would be considered pleasurable and therefore add to the overall
pleasure-to-pain ratio. Like others, we view wellbeing as an out-
come of contentment and other positive emotions (Ryff & Singer,
2008). Another distinguishing and intriguing aspect of content-
ment is that it can be felt during either pleasant or unpleasant
experiences, whereas hedonic wellness is possible only when
pleasure is maximized and pain is minimized. More specifically,
bodily sensations of contentment (e.g., after a nice meal or a warm
bath) are almost certainly related to hedonic pleasure, but more
psychological or perception-based experiences of contentment
(e.g., unconditional acceptance of what is) are not necessarily
contingent on experiencing pleasure alone.
Eudaimonia on the other hand, pertains to doing what is worth
doing and pursuing desires that fulfill objectively valid human
needs (Fromm, 1981). According to the eudemonic perspective,
not all pleasurable behaviors lead to outcomes that promote well-
being (Waterman, 1993). For example, eating a meal rich in fats
and carbohydrates often leads to momentary, but not long-term,
wellbeing. Pleasure, happiness, and positive emotions, in general,
can therefore not be equivalent to wellbeing; instead, there exist
quantifiable activities that lead to flourishing across the life span.
Ryff and Singer (1998,2000,2008) explored a multidimensional
measurement of human wellness across cultures, which they refer
to as psychological wellbeing (PWB). According to this line of
work, PWB is comprised of six aspects of human wellness that
tend to transcend cultural boundaries as well as phases of the
human life span: autonomy, environmental mastery, life purpose,
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
230 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
personal growth, positive relatedness, and self-acceptance. Culti-
vating the six aspects of PWB have been found to promote emo-
tional and physiological health (Ryff & Singer, 1998). In this way
the six PWB factors might be seen as gateways to contentment, but
they are not requisites in and of themselves (Reis, Sheldon, Gable,
Roscoe, & Ryan, 2000;Sheldon, Ryan, & Reis, 1996). The PWB
aspects of self-acceptance and purpose in life appear to be the
factors most closely associated with contentment, but further re-
search is required to investigate their relationship and causality.
Moving forward, a critical next step is to develop and validate an
assessment of contentment so that comparisons can be made
between related constructs, such as happiness, PWB, hedonism,
and satisfaction with life, among other related constructs. Another
important next step is to identify experimental inductions of con-
tentment, such as video clips (Fredrickson & Branigan, 2005),
music (Juslin & Sloboda, 2001), and narratives (Singer, 2004),
which together will offer testable operationalizations of content-
ment that can be used to validate new measures and provide
experimental manipulations for future studies.
Contentment, Desire, and Impulse Control
In our increasingly globalized world, people are flooded daily
with advertisements, TV shows, and Internet memes that promote
a culture of material and financial success. Wealth is routinely
presented as equivalent to happiness, successful startup entrepre-
neurs are deified in the media, and social status is increasingly
defined by an accumulation of possessions and power (Burroughs
& Rindfleisch, 2002;Kasser, 2002). Both scientific and cultural
wisdom agree that “money doesn’t buy happiness,” and despite
overwhelming findings that individuals who score high in materi-
alism suffer from lower levels of mental and physical wellbeing,
the cultural message of “more is better” nonetheless pervades
(Kasser & Ryan, 1993). Studies indicate that simply viewing
desirable consumer products increases materialistic concerns, and
endorsing materialistic ideals can predict lower impulse control
and compulsive behaviors (Bauer, Wilkie, Kim, & Bodenhausen,
2012;Rose, 2007).
This area of research points to several interesting lines of
inquiry with respect to contentment, because contentment by def-
inition regards a state of minimal perceived desires. It is strongly
suspected that people who experience contentment with greater
frequency will not as readily succumb to media and advertising
messages that suggest that we are less than what we really are.
Consumers are frequently promised increased wellbeing in product
promotion, but a contented perspective may empower consumers
to choose the goods and services that add to their quality of life
instead of complicating it. It is also suspected that feeling content-
ment with greater frequency will predict increased ability to con-
trol impulses, relating to improved emotion regulation ability and
prosocial orientation. As a complement to the wellbeing literature,
this line of work would identify individuals who more regularly
experience contentment and investigate downstream behavioral
effects with regards to impulse control and self-regulation.
Future research on the emotion contentment should also address
the emergent findings that cultivating an obsessive relationship to
positive emotions can, perhaps paradoxically, diminish wellbeing
and increase instances of stress and depression (e.g., Baumeister,
Vohs, Aaker, & Garbinsky, 2013;Gruber, Mauss, & Tamir, 2011;
Mauss, Tamir, Anderson, & Savino, 2011;Parks, Della Porta,
Pierce, Zilca, & Lyubomirsky, 2012). These findings are consis-
tent with the teachings of Zen and Buddhist philosophy that our
relationship to our emotions is at least as important as the emotions
themselves. It stands to reason that obsessively pursuing and cling-
ing to positive states like happiness, joy, awe—or perhaps even
contentment—may paradoxically reduce wellness overall. This is
not to say that we are to abandon happiness altogether, but rather
recraft a new relationship to the ebb and flow of pleasant and
unpleasant states that we experience each day.
Contentment and Mindfulness
Studies of contentment are naturally aligned with lines of re-
search in the mindfulness literature, and in particular forms of
therapy that use experiential acceptance and present moment ori-
entation, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).
ACT involves empirically grounded interventions that use present
moment-attunement techniques to change maladaptive behaviors
and increase psychological flexibility (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson,
1999). Experiential acceptance, one of the six core principles of
ACT that together increase psychological flexibility, refers to the
ability to allow thoughts, feelings, emotions, and sensations come
and go without judging or struggling against them. Hayes, Luoma,
Bond, Masuda, and Lillis (2006) describe the acceptance process
as an:
. . . active and aware embrace of those private events occasioned by
one’s history without unnecessary attempts to change their frequency
or form, especially when doing so would cause psychological harm.
For example, anxiety patients are taught to feel anxiety, as a feeling,
fully and without defense; pain patients are given methods that en-
courage them to let go of a struggle with pain, and so on. (p. 7)
There is a clear overlap between mindfulness techniques, expe-
riential acceptance, and a felt experience of contentment. There is
reason to believe that effective mindfulness techniques can lead to
increased feelings of contentment, but more importantly content-
ment can become an experiential indicator that mindfulness tech-
niques—or any self-improvement interventions for that matter—
are working effectively. It is an encouraging possibility for future
research to explore contentment as both a positive life outcome
and a target for cultivation in interventions that promote psycho-
logical flexibility and wellbeing.
Related to intervention, a fascinating empirical question with
respect to contentment as a metaemotion (Gottman, Katz, &
Hooven, 1997) is: can we learn to feel whole, complete, and entire
regardless of the emotional experiences that arise on a daily basis?
If we can feel ashamed that we are sad, or afraid that we are happy,
then perhaps we can learn to cultivate a sense of contentment with
respect to all states. Future research in contemplative practices will
ideally address these central questions, as we move toward a
healthier, more accepting relationship to our emotions in schools,
at work, and at home.
Conclusion
Historically, contentment has been a key focus in some of the
most profound spiritual, philosophical, and theoretical texts across
the millennia. This is likely because contentment is a cornerstone
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
231
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS
to the fundamental human goal to know what it means to be well
and enjoy life. Regardless of culture or situation, the concept of
contentment is broadly treated across all of these traditions as a
feeling of completeness, and can be present regardless of the
situation. Viktor Frankl, an Austrian psychiatrist, founder of logo-
therapy, and Holocaust survivor concisely summarizes this central
point in his book Man’s Search for Meaning (Frankl, 1984 ed.):
Don’t aim at success. The more you aim at it and make it a target, the
more you are going to miss it. For success, like happiness, cannot be
pursued; it must ensue, and it only does so as the unintended side
effect of one’s personal dedication to a cause greater than oneself or
as the by-product of one’s surrender to a person other than oneself.
Happiness must happen, and the same holds for success: you have to
let it happen by not caring about it. I want you to listen to what your
conscience commands you to do and go on to carry it out to the best
of your knowledge. Then you will live to see that in the long-run—in
the long-run, I say!—success will follow you precisely because you
had forgotten to think about it. (pp. 16–17)
To date, there is a paucity of research regarding the nature of
contentment as an emotion that is distinguishable from other,
related emotions and states like satisfaction and serenity. It is
believed that individuals who are contented live healthier and more
fulfilled lives, but only well-designed studies can test these hy-
potheses. Furthermore, extensions of contentment may provide
promising opportunities for improving quality of life through
behavioral interventions involving, for example, mindfulness or
other contemplative practices. From a scientific perspective, con-
tentment likely will be best understood by synthesizing multiple
perspectives across several languages and cultures. We hope this
article serves to stimulate new psychological studies—and per-
sonal cultivations—of contentment.
References
Banavathy, V. K., & Choudry, A. (2014). Understanding happiness: A
vedantic perspective. Psychological Studies, 59, 141–152. http://dx.doi
.org/10.1007/s12646-013-0230-x
Barrett, L. F. (2004). Feelings or words? Understanding the content in
self-report ratings of experienced emotion. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 87, 266–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514
.87.2.266
Bauer, M. A., Wilkie, J. E. B., Kim, J. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012).
Cuing Consumerism: Situational Materialism Undermines Personal and
Social Well-Being. Psychological Science, 23, 517–523. http://dx.doi
.org/10.1177/0956797611429579
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013).
Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The
Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 505–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
17439760.2013.830764
Bonanno, G. A. (2009). The other side of sadness: What the new science
of bereavement tells us about life after loss. Retrieved from http://0-
search.ebscohost.com.patris.apu.edu/login.aspx?direct⫽true&db⫽
psyh&AN⫽2009-08336-000&site⫽ehost-live
Bretherton, I., & Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1974). Responses of one-year-olds
to a stranger in a strange situation. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.),
The origins of fear (pp. 131–164). New York, NY: Wiley.
Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A
conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 348–
370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/344429
Carter, J. (2000). Verse 204 in The Dhammapada. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Chang, L. (2006). Wisdom for the soul: Five millennia of prescriptions for
spiritual healing (p. 360). Washington, DC: Gnosophia.
Cordaro, D. T., Keltner, D., Tshering, S., Wangchuk, D., & Flynn, L. M.
(2016). The voice conveys emotion in ten globalized cultures and one
remote village in Bhutan. Emotion, 16, 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/
emo0000100
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal perfor-
mance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
De Rivera, J., & Páez, D. (2007). Emotional climate, human security, and
cultures of peace. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 233–253. http://dx.doi
.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00506.x
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-
determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a
proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The
satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–
75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Dryden, J. (2004). The life of Alexander the Great (Modern Library
paperback ed.). New York, NY: Modern Library.
Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources. Intersections
of psychology, economics, and demography. Journal of Economic Psy-
chology, 27, 463–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.05.002
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion,
6, 169–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic.
Emotion Review, 3, 364–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740
Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile:
Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-
3514.58.2.342
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (1978). Facial action coding
system (FACS): A technique for the measurement of facial action. Palo
Alto, CA: Consulting.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1982). Felt, false, and miserable smiles.
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 238–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
BF00987191
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural
specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bul-
letin, 128, 203–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203
Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion.
In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of
affective sciences (pp. 572–595). New York, NY: Oxford University
Press.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of
appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 2,
301–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699938808412702
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2004). The psychology of grati-
tude. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Exline, J. J., & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of humility: A preliminary
study. Self and Identity, 3, 95–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
13576500342000077
Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a
prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
113, 464–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.464
Fessler, D. M. T., & Gervais, M. M. (2010). From whence the captains of
our lives: Ultimate and phylogenetic perspectives on emotions in hu-
mans and other primates. In Mind the gap (pp. 261–280). Berlin,
Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Frankl, V. E. (1984). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to
logotherapy. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
232 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). Cultivated emotions: Parental socialization of
positive emotions and self-conscious emotions. Psychological Inquiry,
9, 279–281.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive
psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Amer-
ican Psychologist, 56, 218–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X
.56.3.218
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the
scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emo-
tion, 19, 313–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
Frijda, N. H. (1993). Appraisal and beyond. In N. H. Frijda (Ed.), Ap-
praisal and beyond: The issue of cognitive determinants of emotion (pp.
225–231). Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
Frijda, N. H., Markam, S., Sato, K., & Wiers, R. (1995). Emotions and
emotion words. In J. A. Russell, A. S. R. Manstead, J. C. Wallenkamp,
& J. M. Fernandez-Dols (Eds.), Everyday conceptions of emotion (pp.
121–143). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1007/978-94-015-8484-5_7
Fromm, E. (1981). Primary and secondary process in waking and in altered
states of consciousness. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4,
115–128.
Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology?
Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/
1089-2680.9.2.103
Gaskins, R. W. (1999). “Adding legs to a snake”: A reanalysis of motiva-
tion and the pursuit of happiness from a Zen Buddhist perspective.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 204–215. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1037/0022-0663.91.2.204
Gilbert, D. (2007). Stumbling on happiness. Psychology (Vol. 37, p. 336).
Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400077427
Gilbert, J. H. (1895). Dictionary of burning words of brilliant writers: A
cyclopædia of quotations from the literature of all ages. New York, NY:
W. B. Ketchum.
Goddard, D. (2008). Laotzu’s Tao and Wu Wei (2nd ed.). London, United
Kingdom: Forgotten Books.
Gonzaga, G. C., Turner, R. A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M.
(2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships. Emotion,
6, 163–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.163
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families
communicate emotionally (p. xviii, 366). Retrieved from http://resources.library.
brandeis.edu/login?url⫽http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct⫽
true&db⫽psyh&AN⫽1997-97400-000&site⫽ehost-live&scope⫽site
Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual
foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp.
3–24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Gruber, J., Mauss, I. B., & Tamir, M. (2011). A dark side of happiness?
How, when, and why happiness is not always good. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 6, 222–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/
1745691611406927
Guptacharya, A. (1971). In Natyashastra of Bharatamuni: With the com-
mentary Abhinavabharati by Abhinava Guptacharya (VII. 56–57, pp.
131–132). Varanasi, India: Banaras Hindu University.
Hamilton, W. D. (1972). Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social
insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3, 193–232. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.03.110172.001205
Han, S., Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer
decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Con-
sumer Psychology, 17, 158–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1057-
7408(07)70023-2
Handelman, M. (2000). Tanhuma, Shoftim 18. In Jewish Every Day: The
Complete Handbook for Early Childhood Teachers (p. 25). Behrman
House.
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006).
Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes.
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j
.brat.2005.06.006
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commit-
ment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY:
Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1077-7229(02)80009-8
Heider, K. G. (2006). Landscapes of emotion: Mapping three cultures of
emotion in Indonesia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hejmadi, A., Davidson, R. J., & Rozin, P. (2000). Exploring Hindu Indian
emotion expressions: Evidence for accurate recognition by Americans
and Indians. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psycho-
logical Society/APS, 11, 183–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280
.00239
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in
work-related values. Atlanta, GA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2003). What is culture? A reply to Baskerville. Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 28, 811–813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0361-3682(03)00018-7
Izard, C. (1993). Organizational and motivational functions of discrete
emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Select emotions (pp.
631–641). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Retrieved from http://
psycnet.apa.org/PsycINFO/1993-98937-038
Jackson, T. (2002). Evolutionary psychology in ecological economics:
Consilience, consumption and contentment. Ecological Economics, 41,
289–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00040-X
Johnstone, T., & Scherer, K. R. (1999). The effects of emotions on voice
quality. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic
Sciences (pp. 2029–2032), San Francisco, CA.
Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2001). Music and emotion: Theory and
research. nursinglibraryorg. Retrieved from http://nursinglibrary.org/
Portal/main.aspx?pageid⫽36&sku⫽80380&ProductPrice⫽89.5000
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past,
present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10,
144–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foun-
dations of hedonic psychology. Health San Francisco (pp. xii, 593).
http://dx.doi.org/10.7758/9781610443258
Kasser, T. (2002). The High Price of Materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream:
Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1037/0022-3514.65.2.410
Keltner, D., & Bonanno, G. A. (1997). A study of laughter and dissocia-
tion: Distinct correlates of laughter and smiling during bereavement.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 687–702. http://dx
.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.687
Keltner, D., & Cordaro, D. T. (2016). Understanding multimodal emotional
expressions: Recent advances in basic emotion theory. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi⫽10.1.1.701.2261&
rep⫽rep1&type⫽pdf
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and
aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297–314. http://dx.doi
.org/10.1080/02699930302297
Keltner, D., & Lerner, J. S. (2010). Emotion. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske,
& G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 317–352).
New York, NY: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/pc9797600253
Keltner, D., & Shiota, M. N. (2003). New displays and new emotions: A
commentary on Rozin and Cohen (2003). Emotion, 3, 86–91. http://dx
.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.86
Klein, E. (1966). A comprehensive etymological dictionary of the English
Language (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Elsevier.
Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A
review. Biological Psychology, 84, 394–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.biopsycho.2010.03.010
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
233
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS
Kubovy, M. (1999). On the pleasures of the mind. In Well-being: The
foundations of Hedonic psychology (pp. 134–154). New York, NY:
Russell Sage Foundation.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational
theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource
against despair. Social Research, 653–678. Retrieved from http://search
.proquest.com/docview/209670104?pq-origsite⫽gscholar
Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk
psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432. http://dx.doi
.org/10.1023/A:1013944228205
Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being.
In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of subjective well-being: The collected
works of Ed Diener (pp. 75–102). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_4
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happi-
ness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psy-
chology, 9, 111–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety.
[Review, 60 refs]. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 455–468.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90132-3
Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. S. (2012). Evidence for a nonverbal expres-
sion of triumph. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 520–529. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.005
Mauss, I. B., Tamir, M., Anderson, C. L., & Savino, N. S. (2011). Can
seeking happiness make people happy? Paradoxical effects of valuing
happiness. Emotion, 11, 807–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022010
Merel, P. (2000). Tao Te Ching Interpolation. University of Central Florida
Online, Orlando, FL. Retreived from http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/
gthursby/taoism/ttcmerel.htm
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A
review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 179–204. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In
C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology
(pp. 89–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Navia, L. E. (2005). Diogenes the cynic: The war against the world.
Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
Nesse, R. M. (1999). The evolution of hope and despair. Social Research,
66, 429–469.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders
and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychol-
ogy, 109, 504–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504
Oveis, C., Horberg, E. J., & Keltner, D. (2010). Compassion, pride, and
social intuitions of self-other similarity. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 98, 618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017628
Parks, A. C., Della Porta, M. D., Pierce, R. S., Zilca, R., & Lyubomirsky,
S. (2012). Pursuing happiness in everyday life: The characteristics and
behaviors of online happiness seekers. Emotion, 12, 1222–1234. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028587
Patañjali. (1990). Patañjali Yoga Sutras. Madras, India: Ramakrishna
Vedanta Centre Publishing.
Picard, R. W., Vyzas, E., & Healey, J. (2001). Toward machine emotional
intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE transactions
on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 23, 1175–1191. http://dx
.doi.org/10.1109/34.954607
Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model
of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive
development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology,
17, 715–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340
Reddy, V. (2000). Coyness in early infancy. Developmental Science, 3,
186–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00112
Reeve, J. (1993). The face of interest. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 353–
375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00992325
Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily
well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/
0146167200266002
Reps, P., & Senzaki, N. (Eds.). (1998). Zen Flesh, Zen Bones: A Collection
of Zen and Pre-zen Writings. Claredon, VT: Tuttle Publishing.
Rose, P. (2007). Mediators of the association between narcissism and
compulsive buying: The roles of materialism and impulse control. Psy-
chology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists
in Addictive Behaviors, 21, 576–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-
164X.21.4.576
Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psycho-
logical Bulletin, 110, 426–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909
.110.3.426
Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional
episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819. http://dx
.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A
single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 57, 493–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514
.57.3.493
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the
facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-
066X.55.1.68
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the
meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6
.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological
well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,
719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (1998). The contours of positive human health.
Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2000). Interpersonal flourishing: A positive
health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy Review, 4, 30–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR
0401_4
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you
are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of
Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-
9019-0
Saunders, J. (1966). Greek and Roman philosophy after Aristotle (Vol. 8).
New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A. E., & Johnstone, T. E. (2001). Appraisal
processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive
psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York,
NY: Simon and Schuster.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An
introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion
knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061
Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain
positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing
best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 73–82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760500510676
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
234 CORDARO, BRACKETT, GLASS, AND ANDERSON
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good
day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Person-
ality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1177/01461672962212007
Shiota, M. N., Campos, B., & Keltner, D. (2003). The faces of positive
emotion: Prototype displays of awe, amusement, and pride. Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 1000, 296–299. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1196/annals.1280.029
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispo-
sitions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment
style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/17439760500510833
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. (2007). The nature of awe:
Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emo-
tion, 21, 944–963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930600923668
Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, S. L., Yeung, W. H., Moser, S. E., & Perea, E. F.
(2011). Feeling good: Autonomic nervous system responding in five
positive emotions. Emotion, 11, 1368–1378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/
a0024278
Silvia, P. (2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 17, 57–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
8721.2008.00548.x
Singer, J. A. (2004). Narrative identity and meaning making across the
adult lifespan: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 72, 437–460.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00268.x
Sinnott, J. D., & Berlanstein, D. (2006). The importance of feeling whole:
Learning to feel connected, community, and adult development. In C. H.
Hoare (Ed.), Oxford handbook of adult development and learning (pp.
381–406). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in
emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
Snyder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope.
Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 355–360. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01764.x
Stemmler, G. (2004). Physiological processes during emotion. In P. Philip-
pot & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), The regulation of emotion (pp. 33–70).
Routledge: Taylor & Francis. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410610898
Stemmler, G. (2009). Der Emotionsprozess [The process of emotions]. In
G. Stemmler (Ed.), Psychologie der emotion:Enzyklopädie der Psy-
chologie. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe Publishing.
Strong, J. (1995). New Strong’s exhaustive concordance of the Bible.
Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishing.
Suzuki, D. T. (1961). Essays in Zen Buddhism. New York, NY: Grove
Press.
Swami, H. D. G. A. B. (1983). Bhagavad-Gita as it is. Alachua, FL: The
Bhaktivedanta Book Trust.
Swinton, J. (1997). From Bedlam to Shalom: Towards a practical theology
of human nature, Interpersonal relationships and mental health care.
Aberdeen, Scotland: University of Aberdeen.
The New English Bible; New Testament. (1961). New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Thomas, H. (1965). Biographical encyclopedia of philosophy (p. 76).
Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Show your pride: Evidence for a
discrete emotion expression. Psychological Science: A Journal of the
American Psychological Society/APS, 15, 194–197. http://dx.doi.org/10
.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503008.x
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Emerging insights into the nature and
function of pride. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16,
147–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00493.x
Tsai, J. L., Louie, J. Y., Chen, E. E., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Learning what
feelings to desire: Socialization of ideal affect through children’s story-
books. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 17–30. http://dx
.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292749
Tze, L. (1974). The canon of reason and virtue: Lao Tze’s Tao Teh Ching,
Chinese and English (T. D. Suzuki & P. Carus, Eds.). Chicago, IL: Open
Court Pup Co.
Tze, L. (1997). Tao Te Ching: Dover thrift editions (J. Legge, Ed.).
Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
Venkatesananda, S. (2010). Vasistha’s yoga. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Ventegodt, S., Andersen, N. J., & Merrick, J. (2003). The life mission
theory II. The structure of the life purpose and the ego. The Scientific
World Journal, 3, 1277–1285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.114
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher
psychological processes. (p. 159). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of
personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
Watson, B. (1992). Ryokan: Zen Monk-Poet of Japan. New York, NY:
Columbia University Press.
Watson, T. (1829). The Art of Divine Contentment. London, United King-
dom: Religious Tract Society.
Weekley, E. (2012). An etymological dictionary of modern English (Vol.
2). New York, NY: Courier Dover Publications.
Williams, L. A., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2015). Warm thanks: Gratitude ex-
pression facilitates social affiliation in new relationships via perceived
warmth. Emotion, 15, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000017
Wright, R. (1995, August). The evolution of despair. Time, 146, 50–57.
Received January 19, 2016
Revision received August 16, 2016
Accepted August 17, 2016 䡲
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
235
CONTENTMENT ACROSS CULTURES & TRADITIONS