Identified during the survey works conducted under the project ANSOR – Anthropization of the Sorraia Valley, the archaeological site of Barranco do Farinheiro corresponds to three different Chalcolithic occupation areas (loci 1 to 3) located on the edge of Miocene escarpment overhanging to the alluvial plain of the Sorraia River, few kilometers east from the chalcolithic site of Cabeço do Pé da Erra. So far, the excavation works were focused exclusively on Barranco do Farinheiro 2, affected by erosion processes possibly motivated by sand extraction. Despite the small excavated area (36 m2), a negative feature was identified herein. It corresponds to a ditch arranged in two levels with distinct altimetry, filled with an interesting sedimentation sequence. Two moments of occupation/ use are discernible: a first one, possibly integrated in the first half of the 3rd millennium BCE; a second, datable already of its second half. Both of these occupation/ use episodes are separated by a sterile stratigraphic level corresponding to deposits derived from the disaggregation of the ditch walls – which allows distinguishing these two phases, separated by an occupation hiatus. These two episodes are also distinguishable by the presence of a set of decorated pottery in the upper levels, absent in the lower levels of the ditch colmatation sequence. This set includes sherds with the typical printed decoration of the «acacia-leaf» group and bell beaker ceramics (plain and decorated), stratigraphically associable. This last occupation took place when the ditch was already half filled; the deposition of vessels along its West wall, as well as the deposition of loom weights on a pit (about 200 fragments, corresponding exclusively to the crescent type), was performed during this latter phase. Based on the data collected in Barranco do Farinheiro 2, the authors rehearse a preliminary attempt to characterize the beaker occupation on the left bank of the lower Tagus River, showing that the scarcity of sites therein identified (in opposition to the intense occupation known on the right bank) could be probably explained by archaeographic contingencies, not exactly by a lack of effective use of the territory.