ArticlePDF Available

Halitosis and helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Halitosis is used to describe any disagreeable odor of expired air regardless of its origin. Numerous trials published have investigated the relation between Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection and halitosis, and even some regimes of H pylori eradication have been prescribed to those patients with halitosis in the clinic. We conducted a meta-analysis to define the correlation between H pylori infection and halitosis. Objectives: To evaluate whether there is a real correlation between H pylori infection and halitosis, and whether H pylori eradication therapy will help relieve halitosis. Methods: We searched several electronic databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfangdata) up to December 2015. Studies published in English and Chinese were considered in this review. After a final set of studies was identified, the list of references reported in the included reports was reviewed to identify additional studies. Screening of titles and abstracts, data extraction and quality assessment was undertaken independently and in duplicate. All analyses were done using Review Manager 5.2 software. Results: A total of 115 articles were identified, 21 of which met the inclusion criteria and presented data that could be used in the analysis. The results showed that the OR of H pylori infection in the stomach between halitosis-positive patients and halitosis-negative patients was 4.03 (95% CI: 1.41-11.50; P = 0.009). The OR of halitosis between H pylori-positive patients and H pylori-negative patients was 2.85 (95% CI: 1.40-5.83; P = 0.004); The RR of halitosis after successful H pylori eradication in those H pylori-infected halitosis-positive patients was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.08-0.39; P <0.0001), compared with those patients without successful H pylori eradication. And the RR of halitosis before successful H pylori eradication therapy was 4.78 (95% CI: 1.45-15.80; P = 0.01), compared with after successful H pylori eradication therapy. Conclusions: There is clear evidence that H pylori infection correlates with halitosis. H pylori infection might be important in the pathophysiological mechanism of halitosis, and H pylori eradication therapy may be helpful in those patients with refractory halitosis.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Halitosis and helicobacter pylori infection
A meta-analysis
Wenhuan Dou, MM, Juan Li, MM, Liming Xu, MM, Jianhong Zhu, PhD, Kewei Hu, MM, Zhenyu Sui, MM,
Jianzong Wang, MM, Lingling Xu, MM, Shaofeng Wang, MM
, Guojian Yin, PhD
Abstract
Background: Halitosis is used to describe any disagreeable odor of expired air regardless of its origin. Numerous trials published
have investigated the relation between Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection and halitosis, and even some regimes of H pylori
eradication have been prescribed to those patients with halitosis in the clinic. We conducted a meta-analysis to dene the correlation
between H pylori infection and halitosis.
Objectives: To evaluate whether there is a real correlation between H pylori infection and halitosis, and whether H pylori eradication
therapy will help relieve halitosis.
Methods: We searched several electronic databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and
Wanfangdata) up to December 2015. Studies published in English and Chinese were considered in this review. After a nal set of
studies was identied, the list of references reported in the included reports was reviewed to identify additional studies. Screening of
titles and abstracts, data extraction and quality assessment was undertaken independently and in duplicate. All analyses were done
using Review Manager 5.2 software.
Results: A total of 115 articles were identied, 21 of which met the inclusion criteria and presented data that could be used in the
analysis. The results showed that the OR of H pylori infection in the stomach between halitosis-positive patients and halitosis-negative
patients was 4.03 (95% CI: 1.4111.50; P=0.009). The OR of halitosis between H pylori-positive patients and H pylori-negative
patients was 2.85 (95% CI: 1.405.83; P=0.004); The RR of halitosis after successful H pylori eradication in those H pylori-infected
halitosis-positive patients was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.080.39; P<0.0001), compared with those patients without successful H pylori
eradication. And the RR of halitosis before successful H pylori eradication therapy was 4.78 (95% CI: 1.4515.80; P=0.01),
compared with after successful H pylori eradication therapy.
Conclusions: There is clear evidence that H pylori infection correlates with halitosis. H pylori infection might be important in the
pathophysiological mechanism of halitosis, and H pylori eradication therapy may be helpful in those patients with refractory halitosis.
Abbreviations: CBS =cystathionine b-synthase, CLO-test =campylobacter-like organism test, CSE =cystathionine g-lyase,
ENT =ears, nose, and throat, GERD =gastroesophageal reux disease, H pylori =Helicobacter pylori, H2S =hydrogen sulde, MM
=methyl mercaptan, UBT =urea breath test, VSC =volatile sulfur compounds.
Keywords: halitosis, Helicobacter pylori, meta-analysis
1. Introduction
The term halitosis or bad breath is generally dened to
describe any noticeable disagreeable odor of expired air
regardless of its origin.
[1]
The diagnosis of halitosis can always
be genuine halitosis, pseudo halitosis, and halitophobia.
[2]
As
a public social health problem, genuine halitosis is always
classied into physiological and pathophysiological illness,
which affects a signicant number of people around the world.
Research reveals that nearly 50% of the adult population has
halitosis.
[3]
The cause of the halitosis is often considered to be found in the
oral cavity. It was found that 80% to 90% of patients with
halitosis was caused by oral conditions, dened as bad breath or
oral malodor.
[4]
Halitosis usually results from deep caries,
pericoronitis, periodontal disease, exposed necrotic tooth pulps,
peri-implant disease, imperfect dental restorations, unclean
dentures, tongue coating, mucosal lesions, and factors causing
decreased salivary ow rate.
[4]
The causative organisms from
halitogenic biolm on the posterior dorsal tongue, and/or within
gingival crevices/periodontal pockets are usually gram-negative
anaerobic bacteria. The basic pathophysiological process is
microbial degradation of sulfur containing amino acid sub-
strates, for example, methionine, cysteine, and cysteine.
[5]
Bacterial metabolism of these kinds of amino acids leads to
metabolites including many compounds, such as volatile sulfur
compounds (VSC), for example, hydrogen sulde (H
2
S), methyl
Editor: Natale Figura.
WD, JL, LX, and JZ contribute equally in this meta-analysis.
The authors have no conicts of interest to disclose.
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Afliated Hospital of Soochow
University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, Peoples Republic of China.
Correspondence: Guojian Yin, Department of Gastroenterology, The Second
Afliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, Peoples
Republic of China (e-mail: ygj234@163.com); Shaofeng Wang, Department of
Gastroenterology, The Second Afliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou,
Jiangsu Province 215004, Peoples Republic of China
(e-mail: sfwang68@yahoo.com.cn).
Copyright ©2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All
rights reserved.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Medicine (2016) 95:39(e4223)
Received: 5 April 2016 / Received in nal form: 29 May 2016 / Accepted: 20
June 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004223
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Medicine®
OPEN
1
mercaptan (MM, CH
3
SH), dimethyl sulde, and skatole,
indole.
[6]
The main odorants implicated in intraoral halitosis
are MM and H
2
S.
[7]
About 10% to 20% of all genuine halitosis cases are attributed
to extra-oral diseases,
[5]
including upper and lower respiratory
tract disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, some systemic dis-
eases, metabolic diseases, medications, and cancer.
[4]
Some
authorities have reported that the ears, nose, and throat (ENT)
are the most common sites of origin of extra-oral halitosis,
[5]
and
it is well established that various ENT disorders and symptoms
may be a manifestation of gastroesophageal reux disease
(GERD). Poelmans et al
[8]
showed that patients with suspected
GERD-related ENT symptoms had a high prevalence of
esophagitis and this was associated with better response to
antisecretory therapy. Moshkowitz et al
[9]
found that halitosis
was a frequent symptom of GERD and might be considered an
extra-esophageal manifestation of GERD. Struch et al
[10]
showed
clear evidence for an association between GERD and halitosis
and suggested treatment options for halitosis, such as proton
pump inhibitors.
It was Tiomny et al
[11]
who rst showed the possible
connection between halitosis and Helicobacter pylori (H
pylori) infection in a case report. Since then, Hpylori
infection has been investigated with regards to a potential
relationship with halitosis in the past 20 years in many
studies, and inconsistent results from case reports, epidemio-
logical studies, randomized controlled trials, and quasir-
andomized controlled trials have been reported.
[7,1129]
For
example, data from Ierardi et al
[13]
showed that Hpylori
eradication could resolve the symptom of halitosis. Serin
et al
[19]
showed that halitosis was a frequent and treatable
symptom of Hpylori-positive nonulcer dyspepsia and
suggested an Hpylorieradication therapy for those patients
with halitosis. However, on the contrary, in Tangerman study
no association between halitosis and Hpyloriinfection was
found and he concluded that halitosis always originated
within the oral cavity and seldom or never within the
stomach.
[7]
In order to clarify the possible relation between the H pylori
infection and the annoying halitosis, we conducted an exhaustive
review and meta-analysis of all the literatures related to this
subject to evaluate whether H pylori is a cause of halitosis and
whether eradication of H pylori can relieve it.
2. Methods
2.1. Search strategy
The Medical Ethics Committee of a 3-A hospital, the second
Afliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Suzhou, China,
approved the study. Due to the review nature of the study,
informed consent was waived. A comprehensive, computerized
literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Web
of Science, and Wanfangdata from the beginning of indexing
for each database to December 2015, by 2 independent
investigators (GY and WD). Articles published in English and
Chinese were considered in this review. Search terms included:
halitosis,”“bad breath,or malodor,combined with
Helicobacter pylori,orurea breath test.The title and
abstract of eligible studies were then reviewed to exclude any
study that was irrelevant to the research question. After a nal
set of studies was identied, the list of references reported in the
included reports was reviewed to identify additional studies.
We did not include data presented only as abstracts at
conferences.
2.2. Study selection and data extraction
Two review authors, Guojian Yin and Wenhuan Dou indepen-
dently assessed the abstracts of studies resulting from the
searches. Studies were included if they met the following criteria:
published as an original article; published as case reports, case-
control studies, cross-sectional studies, randomised/quasi-ran-
domised controlled trials, and comparative clinical experimental
trial; the relation between the incidence of halitosis and Hpylori
infection, or the incidence of halitosis before and after
eradication therapy of H pylori, were investigated in these
articles. Full text copies of any relevant and potentially relevant
studies, those appearing to meet the inclusion criteria, or for
which there were insufcient data in the title and abstr act to make
a clear decision, were obtained. The full articles were assessed
independently by 2 review authors and any disagreement on the
eligibility of included studies was resolved through discussion
and consensus.
2.3. Statistical analysis
All studies were grouped and analyzed on the basis of study
design: Hpyloriinfection rates in patients with or without
halitosis (group 1); Halitosis rates in patients with or without
H pylori infection (group 2); Halitosis rates in infected
halitosis patients after the treatment with or without successful
H pylori eradication (group 3); Halitosis rates in Hpylori-
infected patients before and after successful H pylori eradica-
tion (group 4).
The Cochrane Q-statistic and the I
2
-statistic were used to
assess statistical heterogeneity between studies, and an I
2
value
of >50% or a Pvalue <0.05 for the Q-statistic was taken to
suggest signicant heterogeneity.
[30]
In the presence of heteroge-
neity, the random-effects model is recommended by the Cochrane
collaboration, because its assumptions account for the presence
of variability among studies.
[31,32]
As the included studies in each
subgroup were less than 10, the publication bias was not assessed
through Funnel plot or Begg test
[33]
and Egger tests in this
study.
[34]
All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and a probability level of P<
0.05 was considered signicant. Results were presented in
accordance with the guidelines proposed by MOOSE.
[35]
ORs
(case-control studies, cross-sectional studies) and RRs (random-
ized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials, or
comparative clinical experimental trials) were used as the
reporting different risk estimates. All analyses were done using
Review Manager 5.2 software.
3. Results
The search strategy generated 115 citations, of which 57 were
considered of potential value. Thirty-six of these 57 articles were
subsequently excluded from the meta-analysis for various
reasons (21 studies were excluded by inclusion criteria, 10
reviews, 4 meeting abstracts/summaries, and 1 comment). No
additional article was included from the reference of the included
21 articles even after an overall and careful inspection of those
references. In the nal analysis 21 articles (2 case reports, 1 cross-
sectional study, 13 case-control studies, 4 comparative quasi
clinical experimental trials, and 1 prospective nonrandomized
Dou et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 Medicine
2
open-label trial) were included. Figure 1 shows the ow-sheet of
these studies and their classication by study design. Four
subgroups were further classied in the nal meta-analysis.
The characteristics of the studies are shown in Table 1. The
publication dates of the studies included in the meta-analysis
ranged from 1992 to 2015. The 21 studies were ranked as
moderate quality. A total of 5062 participants were involved in
these studies (2312 participants in group 1, 2052 participants in
group 2, 128 participants in group 3, and 570 participants in
group 4).
3.1. Group 1 (n =7): H pylori infection rates in patients
with or without halitosis
Halitosis rates were associated with a statistically signicant
increase of H pylori infection as shown by the random-effects
model: Overall OR is 4.03 (1.4111.50) with P<0.05 (Fig. 2).
Evidence of heterogeneity was shown between the studies: The I
2
was 89 and P<0.05. The random-effects meta-analysis was
therefore applied to minimize the effects of heterogeneity.
3.2. Group 2 (n =9): halitosis rates in patients with or
without H pylori infection
Hpyloriinfection rate were associated with a statistically
signicant increase of halitosis as shown by the random-
effects model: overall OR is 2.85 (1.405.83) with P<0.01
(Fig. 3). Evidence of heterogeneity was shown between the
studies: The I
2
was 87.20 and P<0.05. The random-effects
meta-analysis was therefore used to minimize the effects of
heterogeneity.
3.3. Group 3 (n =3): halitosis rates in H pylori-infected
halitosis patients after the treatment with or without
successful H pylori eradication
Compared with the halitosis rates of those H pylori-infected
halitosis patients without successful H pylori eradication after the
treatment, the halitosis rates of the patients with successful H
pylori eradication were lower with a statistical signicance:
overall RR is 0.17 (0.080.39) with P<0.0001 (Fig. 4). There
was no evidence of heterogeneity between the studies (the I
2
was
11.00 and P>0.05). The xed-effects meta-analysis was
therefore chosen to assess the overall RR effects.
3.4. Group 4 (n =5): halitosis rates in H pylori-infected
patients before and after successful H pylori eradication
Compared with the halitosis rates in those H pylori-infected
patients before the successful H pylori eradication, it was lower
after successful H pylori eradication therapy with a statistical
signicance: overall RR is 4.78 (1.4515.80) with P<0.05
(Fig. 5). There was evidence of heterogeneity between the studies:
the I
2
was 90 and P<0.05 suggesting evidence of heterogeneity.
Figure 1. The ow sheet of the studies and the corresponding classication by study design.
Dou et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 www.md-journal.com
3
Table 1
The characteristics of the included studies in this meta-analysis.
Author/year of
publication/country Study design Study type
Age, y, mean
or range Male, %
Case
number Halitosis test
H pylori test
(location)
Eradication therapy
of H pylori UGID
ENT
diseases
Oral
diseases
Tiomny et al/1992/
Israel
Suggest a new explanation for halitosis based
on clinical experience of H pylori
eradication
Case report Unknown 50.0 4 Obvious to family members,
family physicians and
gastroenterologists)
RUT/UBT /
Histology
(stomach)
Double-drug for 4 weeks
(bismuth+ metronidazole)
Yes Unknown Unknown
Ierardi et al/1998/
Italy
Investigate the effects of H pylori eradicate
therapy on halitosis
Comparative
quasiclinical
experimental trial
45.3 (1770) 50.0 58 Halimeter/ Organoleptic
(researcher)
UBT/histology
(stomach)
Double-drug (omeprazole + amoxicillin)
for 14 days, and Triple-drug
(omeprazole+ clarithromycin +
metronidazole) for 10 days in
cases of eradication failure
Chronic
dyspeptic
patients
No No
Gasbarrini et al/
1998/ Italy
Evaluate the prevalence of H pylori
infection and gastrointestinal symptoms
in patients with IDDM
Case-control 35 ±11 43.1 116 Questionnaire (patients) UBT (stomach) Unknown Unknown Unknown
Gasbarrini et al/
1999/ Italy
Compare the H pylori eradication rate in a group
of IDDM H pylori infected patients and in a
control group of infected dyspeptic patients
Comparative quasi
clinical
experimental trial
39±12 58.1 31 Questionnaire UBT (stomach) Triple-drug for 7 days for IDDM
patients (pantoprazol + amoxicillin +
clarithromycin)
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Shashidhar et al/
2000/USA
Evaluate safety and efcacy of triple-drug
eradication therapy in symptomatic children
with H pylori infection
Prospective,
nonrandomized,
open-label trial
11 (125) 40.6 32 Questionnaire RUT/histology
(stomach)
Triple-drug for 2 weeks (lansoprazole
+amoxicillin + clarithromycin)
Yes Unknown Unknown
Werdmuller et al/
2000/The
Netherlands
Compare the clinical presentations in relation to
HP infection in a consecutive series of
patients for gastroscopy
Case-control 50 (2287) in H pylori
positive patients; 46
(1383) in H pylori
negative patients
46.5 404 Questionnaire Histology, Culture and
Gram stain, RUT, and
ELISA (stomach)
No Unknown Unknown
Hoshi et al/2002/
Japan
Investigate the relationship between
gastrointestinal conditions and halitosis
Case-control 44.7 (2177) in H
pylori-positive patients;
33.8 (1867) in H pylori
negative patients
73.9 46 Organoleptic UBT (stomach) Unknown Unknown Unknown
Serin et al/2003/
Turkey
Investigate the frequency of halitosis before and
after eradication therapy in patients with H
pylori-positive non-ulcer dyspepsia.
Comparative quasi
clinical
experimental trial
38.2 (2070) 46.6 148 Questionnaire (both the
patients and their
relatives)
Histology (stomach) Triple-drug eradication therapy
for 14 days
No No No
Candelli et al/2003/
Italy
Investigate the effects of H pylori infection on
gastrointestinal symptoms in young DM1
patients
Case control 14.8 ±5.6 (621) 54.5 121 Questionnaire UBT (stomach) Without known
peptic ulcer
disease
Unknown Unknown
Li et al/2005/China Analyze the clinical characteristics of dyspeptic
symptoms in patients
Case-control 49.5 (OD patients); 45.6
(FD patients)
70.3 in OD
patients;
54.4 in FD
patients
239 as OD;
543 as FD
Questionnaire Under endoscopy
(stomach)
Yes Unknown Unknown
Adler et al/2005/
Argentina
The correlation between halitosis and H pylori
infection on the mouth and the stoma
Case-control 56.5 (2474) 32.4 124 Halimeter PCR (stomach) Yes Unknown Yes
Katsinelos et al/
2007/Greece
investigate the incidence and long-term outcome
of halitosis before and after eradication
therapy in patients with FD and H pylori
Comparative quasi
clinical
experimental trial
40.7 ±10.9 55.6 18 Questionnaire (both the
patients and their
relatives)
UBT/histology
(stomach)
Triple-drug eradication therapy for 10
days and quadruple-drug therapy
for 10days in cases of eradication
failure
Antral gastritis (mild
61.1% and
moderate 38.9%)
No No
Chen et al/2007/
China
Investigate the relationship between halitosis
and H pylori infection
Case-control 37 (1864) 22.0 50 Organoleptic UBT/histology
(stomach)
Unknown Unknown No
Suzuki et al/2008/
Japan
Study the relationship between oral H pylori
infection and halitosis
Case-control 45.3 ±15 42.0 326 Gas chromatography PCR (saliva) No Unknown Yes
Lee et al/2009/Korea To evaluate the effect of Korea red ginseng
on H pylori-associated halitosis
Case report 47.7±10.4 (1672) 44.3 88 Halimeter UBT (stomach) Triple-drug eradication therapy for 7
days or Red ginseng for 10 weeks
FD Unknown No
Tangerman et al/
2012/ The
Netherlands
Evaluate the possible relation between H pylori
and halitosis
Case-control 60 (H pylori +);
52.9 (H pylori -)
63.6 (H pylori +);
47.3 (H pylori -)
78 Organoleptic CLO-test /Histology/
culture (stomach)
Yes Unknown Unknown
Dore et al /
2012/Italy
Examine the role of H pylori in gastrointestinal
symptoms in children
Cross-sectional sero-
epidemiologic
study
Unknown (615) Unknown 1741 Questionnaire (both the
children and their
relatives)
ELISA (stomach) Unknown Unknown Unknown
Chen et al/2012/
China
Explore the relation between halitosis
and H pylori infection
Case-control 49.7 (halitosis + UGID);
41.6 (halitosis); 47.3
(normal control)
55.2 165 Questionnaire UBT (stomach) Yes Unknown Unknown
Yilmaz et al/2012/
Turkey
Compare the presence of H pylori infection in
children with and without halitosis
Case-control 8 (315) in halitosis
patients; 8 (315) in
control group
50 108 Organoleptic Stool antigen test
(stomach)
Unknown No No
HajiFattai et al/2015/
Iran
Relationship of halitosis with Gastric H pylori
Infection
Case-control 34.29 ±13.71 45.45 44 Organoleptic test RUT (stomach) Unknown No No
Zaric et al/2015/
India
Eradication of gastric H pylori ameliorates
halitosis and tongue coating
Case-control 1978 42.86 98 Organoleptic test Nestde-PCR Triple-drug eradication therapy
for 7 days
With dyspeptic Unknown Unkonwn
CLO-test =Campylobacter-like organism test (a rapid urease test), ELISA =enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay, ENT=ear-nose-throat, FD =functional dyspepsia, H pylori =Helicobacter pylori, IDDM =insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, OD =organic dyspepsia, PCR =polymerase
chain reaction, RUT =rapid urease test, UBT=urea breath test, UGID =upper gastrointestinal disease.
Dou et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 Medicine
4
The random-effects meta-analysis was therefore chosen to
minimize the effects of heterogeneity.
4. Discussion
The exact pathophysiological mechanism of halitosis is not
clear. The possible relationship between Hpyloriinfection
and halitosis was rst suggested by Marshall et al
[36]
in 1985.
The potential relation between halitosis and Hpyloriinfection
was further found by Tiomny et al
[11]
through a study of the
effects of Hpylorieradication therapy on halitosis. Since then,
a lot of studies have been focused on this controversial
subject.
In 2002, Hoshi et al
[17]
proved that the intensity of malodor of
mouth air was higher in H pylori-positive patients than in H
pylori-negative patients, and the levels of H
2
S and dimethyl
sulde in mouth air were also signicantly higher in the H pylori-
positive patients than in the H pylori-negative patients. In 2005,
Adler et al
[37]
showed that the detection of H pylori by
histopathology in the gastric biopsies was positive in 80.43%
patients with halitosis and only 6.41% patients without halitosis
(P<0.01). However, all these studies were carried out in the
adults, the outcomes of the studies in the children were on the
contrary. No statistical signicance was reached between
halitosis-positive children and halitosis-negative children by
Dore et al
[25]
and Yilmaz et al.
[27]
Figure 2. H pylori infection rates in patients with or without halitosis.
Figure 3. Halitosis rates in patients with or without H pylori infection.
Figure 4. Halitosis rates in H pylori-infected patients with halitosis after treatment with or without successful H pylori eradication.
Dou et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 www.md-journal.com
5
In this meta-analysis, we took all these studies into account
without considering the differences of age or sex between them.
The results showed that the OR (random model) of H pylori
infection between halitosis-positive patients and halitosis-nega-
tive patients was 4.03 (95% CI: 1.4111.50; P=0.009). We also
did the meta-analysis of the risk of halitosis in the H pylori-
positive patients versus H pylori-negative patients. The results
showed that the OR (random model) of halitosis between
H pylori-positive patients and H pylori-negative patients was
2.85 (95% CI: 1.405.83; P=0.004).
But how does H pylori infection produce halitosis. By assessing
the VSC produced by 3 strains of H pylori (ATCC 43504, SS 1,
and DSM 4867) in broth cultures mixed with different sulfur-
containing amino acids in vitro, Lee et al
[38]
showed that H pylori
was capable of producing H
2
S and MM. Although the
production of VSC by H pylori was a little bit different among
different strains of H pylori and different sulfur-containing amino
acids, it was still the direct evidence that this microorganism can
contribute to the development of halitosis. It was suggested that
the VSC produced in the gastrointestinal tract could diffuse into
the lung air after being carried to the lungs via blood.
[17,39]
Yoo
et al
[40]
found that erosive changes in esophagogastroduodenal
mucosa were strongly correlated with increased VSC levels,
suggesting that H pylori-associated eroded and inamed mucosa
might aggravate halitosis by making VSC diffusion much easier
into blood. It was also shown that in accordance with higher
levels of VSC produced in patients with erosive mucosal changes
and ulcerative changes, the enzymes cystathionine b-synthase
(CBS) and cystathionine g-lyase (CSE) prerequisite for VSC
generation were obviously highly induced.
[40]
On the contrary,
Hoshi et al
[17]
found that although levels of H
2
S and dimethyl
sulde in mouth air were signicantly higher in H pylori-positive
patients than in H pylori-negative patients, which meant H pylori
did have some relation with halitosis, but no signicant difference
was observed in the exhaled breaths between the 2 groups, which
indicated the higher production of VSC in upper gastrointestinal
tract might be not the main source of halitosis. Although the role
of H pylori infection in the pathophysiological mechanism of
halitosis and the increase of VSC level is not clear, it may still be a
frequent contributor to the production of halitosis.
The oral HP infection has also been under investigation in the
past. In1989, H pylori was found in dental plaque by bacterial
culture.
[41]
In 1991, Desai et al
[42]
showed that H pylori was
detected in dental plaque and in gastric antral and body mucosa
in 98%, 67%, and 70%, respectively, of 43 consecutive patients
with dyspepsia. In 1996 in a group of 100 dyspeptic subjects,
H pylori was detected by campylobacter-like organism test
(CLO-test) in saliva, dental plaques, and gingival pockets in 84%,
100%, and 100% of cases and by the culture in 55%, 88%, and
100%, respectively. The presence of H pylori determined by urea
breath test (UBT) in the stomach in these subjects was 60%.
[43]
Whether the H pylori infection in the oral cavity correlates with
halitosis is not clear, further detailed investigation is needed.
In this meta-analysis we also evaluated the effect of Hpylori
eradication therapy on halitosis. The results showed that the RR
(xed model) of halitosis after successful Hpylorieradication in
the stomach in those Hpylori-infected halitosis-positive patients
was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.080.39; P<0.0001), compared with those
patients without successful H pylori eradication. We also did the
meta-analysis of the halitosis rates in Hpylori-infected patients
before and after successful H pylori eradication therapy.
The results showed that the RR (random model) of halitosis
before successful H pylori eradication therapy was 4.78 (95%
CI: 1.4515.80; P=0.01), compared with the patients after
successful H pylori eradication therapy. These results all favor
successful Hpylorieradication therapy to treat those patients of
halitosis.
Interestingly, in 2011, Shalchi et al
[26]
took an further
comparative quasiexperimental clinical trial study of 33 halito-
sis-positive patients without oral diseases (17 H pylori-positive
patients and 16 H pylori-negative patients). All patients received
2-weeksH pylori eradication therapy regardless of H pylori
infection. She found that the RRs of halitosis resolution in H
pylori-positive group over H pylori-negative group were 2.8 and
3.3 respectively, and H pylori eradication could resolve halitosis
in a majority of patients. It was suggested that H pylori might be a
probable rather than a possible cause of halitosis.
In conclusion, there was a clear correlation between H pylori
infection and halitosis. H pylori might be a common contributor
to the production of halitosis. In those refractory halitosis-
positive patients without any oral/ENT/systemic diseases,
H pylori eradication therapy in the clinic may be helpful.
References
[1] Outhouse TL, Al-Alawi R, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Tongue scraping for
treating halitosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD005519.
[2] Akos N, Zsolt B, Peter N, et al. Clinical importance and diagnosis of
halitosis. Fogorv Sz 2012;105:10511.
[3] Arinola JE, Olukoju OO. Halitosis amongst students in tertiary
institutions in Lagos state. Afr Health Sci 2012;12:4738.
Figure 5. Halitosis rates in H pylori-infected patients before and after successful H pylori eradication.
Dou et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 Medicine
6
[4] van den Broek AMWT, Feenstra L, de Baat C. A review of the current
literature on aetiology and measurement methods of halitosis. J Dent
2007;35:62735.
[5] Harvey-Woodworth CN. Dimethylsulphidemia: the signicance of
dimethyl sulphide in extra-oral, blood borne halitosis. Brit Dent J
2013;214:E20.
[6] Chomyszyn-Gajewska M. Contemporary views on etiology and
pathogenesis of halitosis. Przegl Lek 2012;69:12936.
[7] Tangerman A, Winkel EG, de Laat L, et al. Halitosis and Helicobacter
pylori infection. J Breath Res 2012;6:017102.
[8] Poelmans J, Feenstra L, Demedts I, et al. The yield of upper
gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with suspected reux-related
chronic ear, nose, and throat symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:
141926.
[9] Moshkowitz M, Horowitz N, Leshno M, et al. Halitosis and
gastroesophageal reux disease: a possible association. Oral Dis 2007;
13:5815.
[10] Struch F, Schwahn C, Wallaschofski H, et al. Self-reported halitosis and
gastro-esophageal reux disease in the general population. J Gen Intern
Med 2008;23:2606.
[11] Tiomny E, Arber N, Moshkowitz M, et al. Halitosis and Helicobacter
pylori. A possible link? J Clin Gastroenterol 1992;15:2367.
[12] Gasbarrini A, Ojetti V, Pitocco D, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in
patients affected by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Gastroen
Hepat 1998;10:46972.
[13] Ierardi E, Amoruso A, La Notte T, et al. Halitosis and Helicobacter
pylori: a possible relationship. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:27337.
[14] Gasbarrini A, Ojetti V, Pitocco D, et al. Insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus affects eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection. Eur J
Gastroen Hepat 1999;11:7136.
[15] Shashidhar H, Peters J, Lin CH, et al. A prospective trial of lansoprazole
triple therapy for pediatric Helicobacter pylori infection. J Pediatr Gastr
Nutr 2000;30:27682.
[16] Werdmuller BF, van der Putten TB, Balk TG, et al. Clinical presentation
of Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative functional dyspepsia. J
Gastroen Hepatol 2000;15:498502.
[17] Hoshi K, Yamano Y, Mitsunaga A, et al. Gastrointestinal diseases and
halitosis: association of gastric Helicobacter pylori infection. Int Dent J
2002;52(suppl 3):20711.
[18] Candelli M, Rigante D, Marietti G, et al. Helicobacter pylori,
gastrointestinal symptoms, and metabolic control in young type 1
diabetes mellitus patients. Pediatrics 2003;111(4 Pt 1):8003.
[19] Serin E, Gumurdulu Y, Kayaselcuk F, et al. Halitosis in patients with
Helicobacter pylori-positive non-ulcer dyspepsia: an indication for
eradication therapy? Eur J Intern Med 2003;14:458.
[20] Li XB, Liu WZ, Ge ZZ, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics of
dyspeptic symptoms in Shanghai patients. Chin J Dig Dis 2005;6:
627.
[21] Chen X, Tao DY, Li Q, et al. [The relationship of halitosis and
Helicobacter pylori]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2007;16:2368.
[22] Katsinelos P, Tziomalos K, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Eradication
therapy in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with halitosis: long-term
outcome. Med Princ Pract 2007;16:11923.
[23] Lee JS, Kwon KA, Jung HS, et al. Korea red ginseng on Helicobacter
pylori-induced halitosis: newer therapeutic strategy and a plausible
mechanism. Digestion 2009;80:1929.
[24] Chi CJZXZBLLTMC. Analysis of 14C-urea breath test in patients with
halitosis. Labeled Immunoassays Clin Med 2012;19:1546.
[25] Dore MP, Fanciulli G, Tomasi PA, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and
helicobacter pylori infection in school-age children residing in Porto
Torres, Sardinia, Italy. Helicobacter 2012;17:36973.
[26] Shalchi R, Hosseini S, Gholipouri C. Helicobacter pylori and halitosis: a
comparative quasi-experimental clinical trial study. Afr J Microbiol Res
2012;6:8926.
[27] Yilmaz AE, Bilici M, Tonbul A, et al. Paediatric Halitosis and
Helicobacter pylori infection. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012;22:2730.
[28] HajiFattahi F, Hesari M, Zojaji H, et al. Relationship of halitosis with
gastric helicobacter pylori infection. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12:2005.
[29] Zaric S, Bojic B, Popovic B, et al. Eradication of gastric Helicobacter
pylori ameliorates halitosis and tongue coating. J Contemp Dent Pract
2015;16:2059.
[30] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in
meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:55760.
[31] Petitti DB. Meta-analysis and endocrinology. Endocrinol Metab Clin
North Am 1997;26:3144.
[32] Janarthanan S, Ditah I, Adler DG, et al. Clostridium difcile-associated
diarrhea and proton pump inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J
Gastroenterol 2012;107:100110.
[33] Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation
test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088101.
[34] Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis
detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:62934.
[35] Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational
studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of
observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;
283:200812.
[36] Marshall BJ, Armstrong JA, McGechie DB, et al. Attempt to full Kochs
postulates for pyloric campylobacter. Med J Aust 1985;142:4369.
[37] Adler I, Denninghoff VC, Alvarez MI, et al. Helicobacter pylori
associated with glossitis and halitosis. Helicobacter 2005;10:3127.
[38] Lee H, Kho HS, Chung JW, et al. Volatile sulfur compounds produced by
Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:4216.
[39] Kaji H, Hisamura M, Saito N, et al. Evaluation of volatile sulfur
compounds in the expired alveolar gas in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Clin Chim Acta 1978;85:27984.
[40] Yoo SH, Jung HS, Sohn WS, et al. Volatile sulfur compounds as a
predictor for esophagogastroduodenal mucosal injury. Gut Liver
2008;2:1138.
[41] Krajden S, Fuksa M, Anderson J, et al. Examination of human stomach
biopsies, saliva, and dental plaque for Campylobacter pylori. J Clin
Microbiol 1989;27:13978.
[42] Desai HG, Gill HH, Shankaran K, et al. Dental plaque: a permanent
reservoir of Helicobacter pylori? Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:12058.
[43] Pytko-Polonczyk J, Konturek SJ, Karczewska E, et al. Oral cavity as
permanent reservoir of Helicobacter pylori and potential source of
reinfection. J Physiol Pharmacol 1996;47:1219.
Dou et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 www.md-journal.com
7
... Research has shown that H. pylori produces volatile organic compounds and 2 major sulphur compounds responsible for the development of halitosis: hydrogen sulphide and methyl mercaptan [11]. Serin et al. observed a significant reduction in the severity of halitosis in patients who underwent treatment due to a positive result of the H. pylori test [13]. Initially, bad breath was found in 61.5% of the subjects. ...
Article
Full-text available
Bad breath is a clinical symptom encountered by doctors of various specialties in their daily practice. The symptom causes lower self-esteem and a negative perception of the patient by society, and consequently personal and social isolation. Bad breath can be an early manifestation of many systemic diseases. Because its causes are numerous, it is important to properly diagnose the condition and apply the appropriate treatment. The aim of the study was to present the gastroenterological aspect of halitosis on the basis of available literature reports.
... 28 These findings were also indicated by previous investigations. [29][30][31][32][33] Accordingly, halitosis is significantly associated with H. pylori infection, and the latter should be adequately diagnosed and managed to enhance the outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Halitosis might be associated with reduced quality of life for the affected patients as a result of the personal and social embarrassments it might cause. The adequate identification and diagnosis of the underlying condition causing halitosis are important to achieve adequate treatment and prevention of many systemic diseases or even neoplasms. In this literature review study, we have discussed the potential role of halitosis in the diagnosis and identification of systemic diseases. We have discussed many diseases as diseases related to the gastrointestinal tract and liver, others related to metabolic and endocrinal disorders. Furthermore, psychological factors might attribute to pseudo-halitosis, while true halitosis comes secondary to oral and extraoral factors and physiological conditions. Poor oral hygiene might be the only reason for oral malodor, while many oral conditions might also contribute to the development of halitosis. Additionally, some conditions might have a characteristic bad smell, which might significantly enhance the diagnostic value and help clinicians. However, further examination and evaluation should also be conducted to prevent a potential overlap between the different conditions. On the other hand, some extra-oral disorders do not have a characteristic oral smell, which indicates that halitosis alone cannot adequately establish a proper diagnosis. Therefore, raising awareness about seeking medical attention when suffering from halitosis is recommended to achieve better outcomes and help clinicians draw efficacious prevention programs.
Article
Full-text available
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) organisms are well-recognized pathogens responsible for many GI diseases. Streptococcus mutans-related caries and H. pylori infection share similar risk factors such as early childhood occurrence and low socioeconomic status. Therefore, it is possible for these two bacterial diseases to co-exist in the same environment. The present review evaluates the association of H. pylori with dental caries in patients with and without gastric infection, with the objective of comparing the association of H. pylori with dental caries in patients with and without gastric infection. A computerized literature search was performed in online databases from September 2000 to September 2022 using both electronic and manual searches for scientific databases. The research question was framed following the patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) statement. A thorough literature search identified a total of 200 manuscripts. Out of which, 100 were duplicate records and 100 were screened for eligibility, and about 78 articles were excluded, as they were not following PICO and the eligibility criterion. The retrieved 22 articles were sought for retrieval, only 17 were retrieved, and two studies did not fulfill the requirement. A total of 15 studies were recorded as eligible for the present review. There is a close association between the presence of infection of H. pylori in the oral cavity and the increased number of dental caries incidence in patients, even without a gastric infection. This suggests that the oral cavity is another niche for H. Pylori and may be the source of infection, re-infection, and transmission into the stomach.
Book
Full-text available
INSAC WORLD HEALTH SCIENCES
Article
Background and aim: Although patients report either improved or worsened halitosis after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy, such complaints are subjective. Only a few studies have objectively evaluated reports of changes in halitosis after H. pylori eradication; thus, this study aimed to investigate these changes after a successful H. pylori eradication. Methods: Between February 2015 and October 2018, 56,347 patients visited the clinic. Informed consent for participation in this study was obtained from 164 patients scheduled to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to halitosis. Of the 91 patients with H. pylori infection, the halitosis values were evaluated as Refres breath (RB) values using a Total Gas Detector™ System and compared before and after successful H. pylori eradication, as confirmed with urea breath testing. Results: Among the 91 patients treated, 77 patients were successfully eradicated of H.pylori and had their Refres values measured (21 males and 56 females; mean age, 64.2±11.5 years, including 10 smokers); among these 77 patients, 27 showed RB values of >60. Their RB values significantly improved from 73.5 Â (95% confidence interval (CI), 64.1-82.9) to 59.4 Â (95% CI, 50.0-68.8) (p=0.038). Of the 30 patients who could be followed up for >2 years after successful H. pylori eradication, 8 with an RB value ≥60 showed significant RB value improvements from 77.9 Â (95% CI, 59.4-96.4) to 30.1 Â (95% CI, 11.6-48.6) (p=0.0016). Conclusions: H. pylori eradication therapy could improve halitosis, and such improvement could be maintained even 2 years after successful eradication.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori may be one of the main causes of halitosis. This study was performed to evaluate the relationship of Helicobacter pylori infection with halitosis. Materials and Methods: This case control study was performed on 44 dyspeptic patients with a mean age of 34.29±13.71 years (range 17 to 76 years). The case group included 22 patients with halitosis and no signs of diabetes mellitus, renal or liver failure, upper respiratory tract infection, malignancies, deep carious teeth, severe periodontitis, coated tongue, dry mouth or poor oral hygiene. Control group included 22 patients without halitosis and the same age, sex, systemic and oral conditions as the case group. Halitosis was evaluated using organoleptic test (OLT) and Helicobacter pylori infection was evaluated by Rapid Urease Test (RUT) during endoscopy. The data were statistically analyzed using chi square, Mann Whitney and t-tests. Results: Helicobacter pylori infection was detected in 20 (91%) out of 22 halitosis patients, and 7 control subjects (32%) (P<0.001). Conclusion: Helicobacter pylori gastric infection can be a cause of bad breath. Dentists should pay more attention to this infection and refer these patients to internists to prevent further gastrointestinal (GI) complications and probable malignancies.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The influence of gastric Helicobacter pylori infection on the development of oral pathoses remains unclear. The aim of this study is to examine the influence of gastric H. pylori infection on occurrence of halitosis and coated tongue. Materials and methods: Ninety-eight patients with dyspepsia were included in the study and their salivary samples and gastric biopsies were analyzed for the presence of H. pylori by Nested-PCR. Halitosis and coated tongue were assessed at the initial examination and 3 months after systemic eradication therapy against H. pylori. Results: Gastric biopsies of 66 patients were positive for H. pylori. Only one saliva sample was H. pylori positive. At initial examination, halitosis was observed in 20 patients (30.3%) out of 66 who had gastric H. pylori infection and in only 3 patients (9.4%) out of 32 without H. pylori infection (p = 0.0236). Coated tongue was diagnosed in 18 (27.2%) patients with the infection compared to only 2 (6.25%) patients negative for gastric H. pylori (p = 0.0164). Patients with gastric infection were treated with the triple eradication therapy (Amoxicillin, Clarythromycin, Pantoprazol) and their gastric biopsies and oral status were examined 3 months later. Halitosis was significantly more prevalent in the group of patients with persistent H. pylori infection (42.1%) compared to only 6.4% of patients in the group where infection was successfully eradicated (p = 0.0012). Coated tongue was diagnosed in 47.4% of patients where H. pylori was still present after eradication therapy and in only 6.4% where eradication succeeded (p = 0.0003). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that eradication of gastric H. pylori significantly alleviates halitosis and coated tongue, the two oral conditions that may be considered as extragastric manifestations of this common chronic bacterial infection.
Article
Full-text available
Full text of letter at: http://www.bmj.com/content/316/7129/469 Although the concept is useful, the method proposed by Egger et al to detect bias in meta-analyses is itself biased1: it overestimates the occurrence and extent of publication bias. This is easily shown by simulating data for a meta-analysis of a hypothetical intervention that is effective (and therefore has a negative regression coefficient by Egger et al's method) and is free of publication bias (and hence should have an intercept of zero in the regression analysis). In our simulations, each study was of a treated group and a control group, both of equal size. For each simulated meta-analysis, studies ranging from 100 per group to 1000 per group, in increments of 100, were generated. The observed number of events in each group was generated from a binomial distribution. Here is one example in which the true event rate is 40% in the control group and 10% in the treatment group. When the true population values (which would not be known in practice) are used to estimate precision, the regression coefficient is −1.7942 (an estimated log odds ratio equivalent to the expected value of 0.1667) and the intercept (0.0380, P=0.1) is close to the expected value of zero, reflecting the lack of publication bias. However, the regression coefficient estimated when the precision is based on the observed values, as would occur using Egger et al's method, is −1.7169. More importantly, the intercept is −0.4492 and significant (P<0.0001), incorrectly suggesting that there has been publication bias. In general, our other simulations suggest that the bias in the estimated intercept is greater the more effective the intervention actually is and the smaller the sample size of the studies. This problem has several causes. Firstly, the estimates of precision are subject to random error due to sampling variability. This regression-dilution bias causes the regression slope to “tilt” around the mean of the predictor and response variables so that its coefficient is closer to zero; this in turn leads to the intercept becoming negative.2 Secondly, the estimated standardised log odds ratio is correlated with the estimated precision. Thirdly, the precision estimated by the method that we assume Egger et al used3 is a biased estimate of the true precision, with the degree of bias increasing as sample size decreases.4 Clearly, until the causes of the problems we have outlined are better elucidated and solutions developed, one cannot rely on the method proposed by Egger et al to detect publication bias.
Article
Full-text available
Because of the pressure for timely, informed decisions in public health and clinical practice and the explosion of information in the scientific literature, research results must be synthesized. Meta-analyses are increasingly used to address this problem, and they often evaluate observational studies. A workshop was held in Atlanta, Ga, in April 1997, to examine the reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies and to make recommendations to aid authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. Twenty-seven participants were selected by a steering committee, based on expertise in clinical practice, trials, statistics, epidemiology, social sciences, and biomedical editing. Deliberations of the workshop were open to other interested scientists. Funding for this activity was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature on the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses in observational studies using MEDLINE, Educational Research Information Center (ERIC), PsycLIT, and the Current Index to Statistics. We also examined reference lists of the 32 studies retrieved and contacted experts in the field. Participants were assigned to small-group discussions on the subjects of bias, searching and abstracting, heterogeneity, study categorization, and statistical methods. From the material presented at the workshop, the authors developed a checklist summarizing recommendations for reporting meta-analyses of observational studies. The checklist and supporting evidence were circulated to all conference attendees and additional experts. All suggestions for revisions were addressed. The proposed checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology, including background, search strategy, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Use of the checklist should improve the usefulness of meta-analyses for authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and decision makers. An evaluation plan is suggested and research areas are explored.
Article
Halitosis or mouth malodor is a known problem for many years. The knowledge regarding the possible association of Helicobacter pylori infection is quite limited in literature. A comparative quasi experimental clinical trial study was conducted on 17 H. pylori positive patients and 16 H. pylori negative patients who were complaining of halitosis. All patients, regardless of H. pylori infection, received two-week's treatment of clarithromycin (500 mg BID) and amoxicillin (1 g BID) along with three month's long omeprazole; a pretested questionnaire was used for self-reported measurement of halitosis. Halitosis was assessed after three and six months of continued treatment. Patients were also checked for eradication of H. pylori infection. Mean estimated time for improvement was 74.4 days for H. pylori negative group compared to 46.8 days for H. pylori positive group. 12 out of 17 patients in this group improved during the treatment time, while only 4 of the 16 patients in H. pylori negative group improved (P<0.01). The relative risks of halitosis resolution in H. pylori positive group over H. pylori negative group were 2.8 and 3.3, respectively after 3 and 6 months. H. pylori eradication can resolve halitosis in majority of patients without an oral pathology causing halitosis. H. pylori may be a probable rather than a possible cause of halitosis.
Article
Halitosis is an unpleasant condition that causes social restraint. Studies worldwide indicate a high prevalence of moderate halitosis, whereas severe cases are restricted to around 5% of the populations. There is the presence of odoriferous substances in exhaled air, especially the volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) produced by bacteria. Halitosis is caused mainly by tongue coating and periodontal disease. Bacterial metabolism of amino acids leads to metabolites including many compounds, such as indole, skatole and volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), hydrogen sulphide, methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulphide. They are claimed to be the main etiological agents for halitosis. The paper reviews the prevalence and distribution of halitosis, oral malodour, its aetiology, concepts of general and oral health and diseases. Eating, smoking and drinking habits and understanding of halitosis as a social norm has been highlighted. It is a public social health problem. The dental professionals should be aware of the cultural perceptions of halitosis among racially and culturally diverse populations. In general, physicians and dentists are poorly informed about the causes and treatments for halitosis.
Article
Halitosis is a symptom and not a diagnosis. Rather, the topic represents a spectrum of disorders, including intra-oral, otorhinolaryngological, metabolic, systemic, pulmonary, psychological and neurological conditions. Halitosis may be the third most common trigger for patients to seek dental care and can cause significant impact on patient quality of life. About 10% of all genuine halitosis cases are attributed to extra-oral processes. Some authorities have reported that the nasal cavity and the oropharynx are the most common sites of origin of extra-oral halitosis. However, recent evidence appears to suggest that blood borne halitosis may be the most common subtype of extra-oral halitosis. Tangerman and Winkel report that dimethyl sulphide was the main volatile implicated in extra-oral blood borne halitosis. They proposed a hitherto unknown metabolic condition by way of explanation for this finding, resulting in systemic presence of dimethyl sulphide in blood and alveolar breath. This paper reviews the knowledge base regarding the behaviour of dimethyl sulphide in physiological systems and those disorders in which blood borne halitosis secondary to dimethylsulphidemia is thought to have an aetiopathological role.