ArticlePDF Available
Are Agricultural Soils Dumps for Microplastics of Urban Origin?
Luca Nizzetto,*
,,
Martyn Futter,
§
and Sindre Langaas
Norwegian Institute for Water Research, NO-0349, Oslo, Norway
Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment, Masaryk University, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
§
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Due to their ubiquitous distribution and chemical
composition, microplastics (MPs) are increasingly being
recognized as a global concern. While it is widely acknowledged
that MPs in the ocean are a serious issue with potentially negative
eects on marine organisms, information about MPs in terrestrial
and freshwater environments is fragmentary.
Based on new MP emission estimates in industrialized
countries, we suggest that widespread application of sewage
sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to
farmlands is likely to represent a major input of MPs to
agricultural soils, with unknown consequences for sustainability
and food security.
Terrestrial emissions are the dominant source of MPs,
including those conveyed to receiving waters by WWTP outfalls.
Recent reports based on product life cycle data
13
oer the rst
quantitative insights into national MP emission inventories. MPs
originate predominantly from automobile tire wear, household
and laundry dust, industrial processes (e.g., blasting and
deashing of plastics), and through deterioration of surfaces
made of or coated with plastic, for example, articial turf and
polymeric paint. Most of these emissions occur in urban and
residential areas. In developed regions, municipal/industrial
euents and even diuse urban runoare eventually conveyed
to WWTPs. During wastewater treatment, over 90% of MPs are
retained in sewage sludge.
4
Eectiveness of MP retention is
dependent on particle density and size. MPs with a density
greater than water are almost completely retained in sewage
sludge during primary and secondary treatment. Tertiary
ltration treatment eectively removes larger oating particles,
while smaller and lighter particles, expectedly, are released with
wastewater euents.
The use of sewage sludge as fertilizer for agricultural
applications is often economically advantageous and is common
in many developed regions. In Europe and North America about
50% of sewage sludge is processed for agricultural use. Using
national data on farm areas, population and sewage sludge fate
(http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat), with estimates of MP emis-
sions
13
and applying broad but conservative uncertainty ranges,
we estimate that between 125 and 850 tons MP/million
inhabitants are added annually to European agricultural soils
either through direct application of sewage sludge or as processed
biosolids. This is at least equal to, and probably much higher than
our estimate of 110 to 180 tons MP/million inhabitants emitted
annually to surface waters based on refs 13. In Europe, in fact,
between 1270 and 2130 tons MPs/million inhabitants are
released to urban environments, annually. Conservatively
assuming that 1090% of MPs produced from road wear and
debris from building coating are collected by sewers, between
360 and 1980 tons MPs are expected to reach municipal
WWTPs. Here, an uncertain fraction of MPs from car tire debris
(conservatively, 2080%) and >90% of MPs from personal care
products are likely to be retained in sludge,
4
giving a total input of
between 250 and 1700 tons/million inhabitants each year.
Sludge application to agricultural land was calculated as the sum
of direct application and application of processed biosolids,
excluding the fraction of wastewater sludge incinerated, disposed
in landlls or subject to other nonagricultural uses. These gures
are highly conservative as sludge is only ever applied to a small
percentage of agricultural land.
There is a broad range of sludge application rates and
intensities to European agricultural land (Figure 1). Application
rates (estimated as compost plus direct application) range from 0
to 91%, with an average of 43%. This equates to average and
maximum areal per-capita loadings of 0.2 and 8 mg MP/ha/yr.
MPs inputs estimated here possibly reect the situation in other
countries with similar socioeconomic conditions and/or similar
use of plastics (e.g., in Asia and the Americas). A rough
extrapolation from data in refs 13produces a total yearly input
of 63 000430 000 and 44 000300 000 tons MPs to European
and North American farmlands, respectively. This would be an
alarmingly high input. Comprehensively, this exceeds the total
accumulated burden of 93 000236 000 tons MPs currently
estimated to be present in surface water in the global oceans.
5
Received: August 16, 2016
Viewpoint
pubs.acs.org/est
© XXXX American Chemical Society ADOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04140
Environ. Sci. Technol. XXXX, XXX, XXXXXX
Regulations generally prohibit use of sludge containing an
excess of harmful substances (including heavy metals and some
organic substances). Neither the relevant European (EU 86/
278/EEC) nor U.S. (Code 503) regulations mention MPs. We
expect that none of the common processing steps (e.g., drying,
pasteurization, composting, etc.) to produce biosolids from
WWTP sludge for agricultural use will remove the MP load.
Reports are emerging about the occurrence and impacts of MPs
in soil, both from breakdown of plastics and sludge additions.
Reproduction of worms was recently shown to be impacted at
MP exposure levels possibly representative of those in
agricultural soils receiving sewage sludge application.
6
Assessing potential impacts for agricultural sustainability and
human health is far from easy. MPs can potentially impact soil
ecosystems, crops and livestock either directly or through the
toxic and endocrine-disrupting substances added during plastics
manufacturing. These substances include short/medium-chain
chlorinated parans (candidates for inclusion in the Stockholm
Convention) and plasticizers, which can represent up to 70% of
the weight of plastics. Endocrinologically active alkylphenols,
such as bisphenols, and ame retardants including several banned
brominated compounds comprise up to 3% by weight of some
plastics. During use, plastic polymers eciently accumulate other
harmful pollutants from the surrounding environment, including
a number of persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances, e.g.
PCBs, dioxins, DDTs and PAHs. Many studies on these topics
can be found in previous issues of ES&T.
It is striking that transfers of MPs (and the hazardous
substances bound to them) from urban wastewater to farmland
has not previously been considered by scientists and regulators.
Studies assessing the scale of contamination of agricultural soils
by MPs are notable for their absence while farm soils may
arguably represent one of their largest environmental reservoirs.
International monitoring programs, additional research into
ecological eects, and awareness raising among farmers,
wastewater treatment operators and the general public are all
urgently needed to frame the problem more accurately. Analysis
of risks and potential impacts of MPs on agricultural
sustainability and human/livestock health must be prioritized
to ensure a safe reuse of municipal waste. From a broader
perspective, these analyses are critical for safeguarding circular
economy objectives including those in which biological nutrients
in waste products can be safely and sustainably reintroduced into
natural and farm ecosystems.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: Luca.nizzetto@niva.no.
Notes
The authors declare no competing nancial interest.
REFERENCES
(1) Lassen, C. et al. Microplastics. Occurrence, Eects and Sources of
Releases to the Environment in Denmark; The Danish Environmental
Protection Agency, 2015; Vol. 205.
(2) Magnusson, K. et al. Swedish Sources and Pathways for Microplastics
to the Marine Environment; IVL Swedish Environmental Research
Institute, 2016; Vol. 88.
(3) Sundt, P.; Schulze, P.-E.; Syversen, F. Sources of Microplastic-
Pollution to the Marine Environment; Norwegian Environment Agency
Miljødirektoaret, 2014; Vol. 86
(4) Carr, S. A.; Liu, J.; Tesoro, A. G. Transport and fate of microplastic
particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2016,91, 174182.
(5) van Sebille, E. A global inventory of small floating plastic debris.
Environ. Res. Lett. 2015,10, 124006.
Figure 1. Estimated rates and intensities of MP application to European agricultural lands. In countries with elevated sludge application rates per unit
area of farmland (such as, for example UK) the level of MPs accumulated in treated soils is expectedly potentially higher than in countries with similar use
of sludge but lower application intensity (e.g., France). National MP upper application rates were estimated as sludge production multiplied by
agricultural application rate multiplied by MP emission per inhabitant multiplied by total population. Areal application rates were estimated as sludge
production multiplied by agricultural application rate then divided by total farm area. Bubbles represent individual countries (Austria (AT), Belgium
(BE), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Denmark (DK), Estonia (EE), Finland (FI), France (FR), Germany (DE), Greece (EL), Ireland (IE), Italy
(IT), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU), Netherlands (NL), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Slovenia (SI), Spain (ES),
United Kingdom (UK)), and bubble sizes represent the fraction of sludge either applied directly to agricultural areas or in the form of processed
biosolids.
Environmental Science & Technology Viewpoint
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04140
Environ. Sci. Technol. XXXX, XXX, XXXXXX
B
(6) Huerta Lwanga, E. Microplastics in the Terrestrial Ecosystem:
Implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae).
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016,50, 26852691.
Environmental Science & Technology Viewpoint
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04140
Environ. Sci. Technol. XXXX, XXX, XXXXXX
C
... Although there is no clear definition of the upper and lower limits of the MP size in actual research, the most commonly used is the 2008 definition by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which states that plastic particles do not exceed 5 mm [30]. Surveys have shown serious MP pollution in soil [31]. The concentration of MPs in agricultural soil in China is 42960 MPs/kg, while the concentration of MPs in coastal sediments in India is as high as 73100 MPs/kg [32]. ...
Article
Full-text available
As a new type of pollutant, the harm caused by microplastics (MPs) to organisms has been the research focus. Recently, the proportion of MPs ingested through the digestive tract has gradually increased with the popularity of fast-food products, such as takeout. The damage to the digestive system has attracted increasing attention. We reviewed the literature regarding toxicity of MPs and observed that they have different effects on multiple organs of the digestive system. The mechanism may be related to the toxic effects of MPs themselves, interactions with various substances in the biological body, and participation in various signaling pathways to induce adverse reactions as a carrier of toxins to increase the time and amount of body absorption. Based on the toxicity mechanism of MPs, we propose specific suggestions to provide a theoretical reference for the government and relevant departments.
... Although sewage sludge is employed as a fertiliser to enhance agricultural yield, microplastics (MPs) are transported from wastewater treatment plants to agricultural fields and terrestrial ecosystems (Li & et al., 2023). It is estimated that between 63,000 and 430,000 tons and 44,000 and 300,000 tons of sewage sludge are used in agricultural lands --59--annually in Europe and North America, respectively (Nizzetto, Futter & Langaas, 2016). It has been reported that the concentration of MPs in treatment sludges ranges from 15,385 to 43,000 particles per kilogram of soil (Mahon & et al., 2017). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
In this chapter, the current pollution status of MP/NPs in the abiotic environments was revealed in terms of surface and groundwater, ocean and sea, soil and air environments. In addition, information was given about the degradation and transportation processes of MP and NPs in the relevant abiotic environmental conditions.
Article
Microplastics have received increased attention due to their negative impacts on the environment and human health. To minimize these impacts, mitigation strategies that are efficient and cost‐effective for a range of plausible conditions need to be developed. Models can be used to support these mitigation‐related decisions. However, modeling studies related to the export of microplastics from terrestrial to aquatic systems have been limited. Here, we review such modeling studies, the trends over time and geography of focus, and discuss pertinent concepts and the underlying physical, chemical, and biological processes. We categorize the published modeling studies, discuss their limitations, and provide recommendations for future research to fill key knowledge gaps. Future modeling efforts should focus on collecting more comprehensive field data for validation, developing continuous models over event‐based, conducting experimental studies to better understand the fundamental processes, developing hybrid modeling frameworks, adopting sediment transport modeling approaches, incorporating land management practices in the models, integrating surface and sub‐surface processes at the watershed scale, and utilizing advanced data‐driven models like foundation models.
Article
Full-text available
Municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are frequently suspected as significant point sources or conduits of microplastics to the environment. To directly investigate these suspicions, effluent discharges from seven tertiary plants and one secondary plant in Southern California were studied. The study also looked at influent loads, particle size/type, conveyance, and removal at these wastewater treatment facilities. Over 0.189 million liters of effluent at each of the seven tertiary plants were filtered using an assembled stack of sieves with mesh sizes between 400 and 45 μm. Additionally, the surface of 28.4 million liters of final effluent at three tertiary plants was skimmed using a 125 μm filtering assembly. The results suggest that tertiary effluent is not a significant source of microplastics and that these plastic pollutants are effectively removed during the skimming and settling treatment processes. However, at a downstream secondary plant, an average of one micro-particle in every 1.14 thousand liters of final effluent was counted. The majority of microplastics identified in this study had a profile (color, shape, and size) similar to the blue polyethylene particles present in toothpaste formulations. Existing treatment processes were determined to be very effective for removal of microplastic contaminants entering typical municipal WWTPs.
Article
Full-text available
Microplastic debris floating at the ocean surface can harm marine life. Understanding the severity of this harm requires knowledge of plastic abundance and distributions. Dozens of expeditions measuring microplastics have been carried out since the 1970s, but they have primarily focused on the North Atlantic and North Pacific accumulation zones, with much sparser coverage elsewhere. Here, we use the largest dataset of microplastic measurements assembled to date to assess the confidence we can have in global estimates of microplastic abundance and mass. We use a rigorous statistical framework to standardize a global dataset of plastic marine debris measured using surface-trawling plankton nets and coupled this with three different ocean circulation models to spatially interpolate the observations. Our estimates show that the accumulated number of microplastic particles in 2014 ranges from 15 to 51 trillion particles, weighing between 93 and 236 thousand metric tons, which is only approximately 1% of global plastic waste estimated to enter the ocean in the year 2010. These estimates are larger than previous global estimates, but vary widely because the scarcity of data in most of the world ocean, differences in model formulations, and fundamental knowledge gaps in the sources, transformations and fates of microplastics in the ocean.
Article
Plastic debris is widespread in the environment, but information on the effects of microplastics on terrestrial fauna is completely lacking. Here, we studied the survival and fitness of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) exposed to microplastics (Polyethylene, <150 μm) in litter at concentrations of 7, 28, 45, and 60% dry weight, percentages that, after bioturbation, translate to 0.2 to 1.2% in bulk soil. Mortality after 60 days was higher at 28, 45, and 60% of microplastics in the litter than at 7% w/w and in the control (0%). Growth rate was significantly reduced at 28, 45, and 60% w/w microplastics, compared to the 7% and control treatments. Due to the digestion of ingested organic matter, microplastic was concentrated in cast, especially at the lowest dose (i.e., 7% in litter) because that dose had the highest proportion of digestible organic matter. Whereas 50 percent of the microplastics had a size of <50 μm in the original litter, 90 percent of the microplastics in the casts was <50 μm in all treatments, which suggests size-selective egestion by the earthworms. These concentration-transport and size-selection mechanisms may have important implications for fate and risk of microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems.
Microplastics. Occurrence, Effects and Sources of Releases to the Environment in Denmark
  • C Lassen
Lassen, C. et al. Microplastics. Occurrence, Effects and Sources of Releases to the Environment in Denmark; The Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2015; Vol. 205.
Sources of Microplastic-Pollution to the Marine Environment
  • P Sundt
  • P.-E Schulze
  • F Syversen
Sundt, P.; Schulze, P.-E.; Syversen, F. Sources of Microplastic-Pollution to the Marine Environment; Norwegian Environment Agency Miljødirektoaret, 2014; Vol. 86
Swedish Sources and Pathways for Microplastics to the Marine Environment
  • K Magnusson
Magnusson, K. et al. Swedish Sources and Pathways for Microplastics to the Marine Environment; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 2016; Vol. 88.
Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants
  • C Lassen
Lassen, C. et al. Microplastics. Occurrence, Effects and Sources of Releases to the Environment in Denmark; The Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2015; Vol. 205. (2) Magnusson, K. et al. Swedish Sources and Pathways for Microplastics to the Marine Environment; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 2016; Vol. 88. (3) Sundt, P.; Schulze, P.-E.; Syversen, F. Sources of MicroplasticPollution to the Marine Environment; Norwegian Environment Agency Miljødirektoaret, 2014; Vol. 86 (4) Carr, S. A.; Liu, J.; Tesoro, A. G. Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2016, 91, 174−182. (5) van Sebille, E. A global inventory of small floating plastic debris. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 124006.