ArticlePDF Available

Common Baskettail, Epitheca cynosura (Odonata: Corduliidae), with extensive dark wing tips.

Authors:
11
Argia 28(3), 2016
On  June , DOB was surveying dragonies at
ree Rivers State Game Area, Cass County, Michigan
(.°, -.°). Many Epitheca were ying along a dirt
road that passed over Wood Creek. Netting a few, they
were determined to be E. cynosura, Common Baskettail,
the expected species at this location. A short time later,
a baskettail-sized dragony with pronounced dark wing
tips ew by. Upon capture, it was identied as a female E.
cynosura, with the identication conrmed later via closer
examination of the shape of the vulvar lamina and various
measurements.
Epitheca cynosura normally has clear wing tips. However,
this individual had dark, smoky coloration that extended
from the tip to the nodus on the forewings and nearly
to the nodus on the hindwings. It was most intense at
the tip to just past the pseudostigma, fading closer to the
nodus and trailing edge of the wings. To our knowledge,
this wing tip color pattern has not been reported in E.
cynosura, or any North American Epitheca in the subgenus
Tetragoneuria. Prince Baskettail (E. princeps), in the sub-
genus Epicordulia, does have dark wing tips which, while
they vary in extent among individuals (Paulson, ;
Tennessen, ), are not as extensive as in our individual.
Common Baskettails also have a basal hindwing spot
that varies from nearly absent to quite extensive depend-
ing on the individual (Curry, ; Westfall and May,
; Paulson,
). e basal
hindwing spot
of this female
extended to
just beyond the
rd antenodal
crossvein,
although the
cell between
the nd and rd
crossveins was
not completely
opaque. e
th crossvein
was marked
with pigment.
Pigment also
lled the trian-
gle, although it was completely opaque only about a third
of the way into the cell. Individuals with brown hindwing
markings reaching the tip of the triangle and lling it (or
extending beyond) have been designated as E. c. simulans
(Muttkowski, ; Davis, ). is form is not unex-
pected in southern Michigan, where the size of the basal
spot runs the gamut (Kormondy, ). e function of
the wing spot is unknown, and there no apparent assortive
mating between clear and spot-winged forms (May, ).
e  June date of this female was towards the end of
the peak ight period for Common Baskettails in south-
ern Michigan, where they are rare after  July (Kormondy,
, MOS, ). Odonata wings may become more pig-
mented with age in some families, including corduliids,
perhaps indicating sexual maturity (Corbet, ). How-
ever, this usually involves the entire wing, rather than just
a portion as in our individual, and is not typical for E.
cynosura. Wing pattern and coloration are important cues
for species and partner recognition in Odonata (Svensson
et al., ; Futahashi, ). It would seem that even
if the darkened wing tips indicated sexual maturity, this
female would not be recognized by male Common Bas-
kettails due to the abberant pattern.
Most reports of atypical wing pigmentation are of a
reduction in dark bands or patches (e.g., Bailowitz and
Danforth, ; Fliedner, ; Nirschl, ; but see
Common Baskettail, Epitheca cynosura (Odonata: Corduliidae), with Extensive
Dark Wing Tips
Julie Craves, Rouge River Bird Observatory, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan <jcraves@
umich.edu> and Darrin O’Brien, Paririe Oaks Ecological Station, Ann Arbor, Michigan <urbanodes@gmail.com>
Epitheca cynosura (Common Baskettail) with dark wing tips.
Detail of Epitheca cynosura (Common
Baskettail) dark wing tips.
12 Argia 28(3), 2016
Arthur, ) rather than the addition of novel pigmen-
tation. Further documentation and vouchers of odonates
with abnormal wing patterns—especially supplementary
pigmentation—could shed light on the frequency and dis-
tribution of this phenomena. e voucher has been depos-
ited in the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology
insect collection.
Acknowledgments
e authors thank Dennis Paulson and Ken Tennessen for
their comments on this specimen.
Literature Cited
Arthur, N. . An unusual form of the Hoary Skimmer
(Libellula nodistica) from the northern California coast
ranges. A (): .
Bailowitz, R. and D. Danforth. . Libellula pulchella
(Twelve-spotted Skimmer) without black wingtips.
A (): –.
Corbet, P.S. . Dragonies, Behavior and Ecology of
Odonata. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Curry, J.R. . Dragonies of Indiana. Indiana Acad-
emy of Science, Indianapolis.
Davis, W.T. . Dragonies of the genus Tetragoneuria.
Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society ():
–.
Fliedner, H. . Two remarkable observations from
Puerto Rico. A (): –.
Futahashi, R. . Color vision and formation in drag-
onies. Current Opinion in Insect Science : –.
Kormondy, E.J. . e systematics of Tetragoneuria,
based on ecological, life history, and morphological
evidence (Odonata: Corduliidae). Miscellaneous Pub-
lications of the Museum of Zoology of the University
of Michigan : –.
May, M.L. . e subgenus Tetragoneuria (Anispo-
tera: Cordullidae: Epitheca) in New Jersey. Bulletin of
American Odonatology (): –.
[MOS] Michigan Odonata Survey. . Michigan
Odonata Survey database. University of Michigan
Museum of Zoology, Insect Division, Ann Arbor.
Muttkowski, R.A. . Studies in Tetragoneuria
(Odonata). Bulletin of the Wisconsin Natural History
Society (): –.
Nirschl, R. . Banded Pennant (Celithemis fasciata)
with greatly reduced wing markings. A (): .
Paulson, D. . Dragonies and Damselies of the East.
Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Svensson E.I., K. Kar lsson, M. Friberg, and F. Eroukhman-
o. . Gender dierences in species recognition and
the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Current
Biology : –.
Tennessen, K. . A Prince Baskettail trifecta. A
():.
Westfall, M.J., Jr. and M.L. May. . Damselies
of North America, nd ed. Scientic Publishers,
Gainesville, Florida.
e Allegheny River Cruiser (Macromia alleghaniensis) in Oklahoma
Michael A. Patten <mpatten@ou.edu> and Brenda D. Smith-Patten <argia@ou.edu>, Oklahoma Biological Survey,
University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 
In many regions in the United States and Canada, the
status of Macromia species, the river cruisers, is unclear,
chiey because the various species are dicult to distin-
guish in the eld, with correct identity of individuals on
the wing challenging at best and often impossible. Even
in hand, some individuals are problematic. As an example,
we reported (Patten and Smith-Patten, ) a putative
M. illinoiensis georgina × M. annulata (the Bronzed River
Cruiser) because this individual has the hamules of the
former species but the yellow vertex, extensive antehu-
meral stripes, and abdominal pattern of the latter. We
do not know if this individual is instead an aberrant M.
illinoiensis (Swift River Cruiser), even with a specimen in
hand. Add to these diculties the possibility that some
species hybridize (Abbott, : ) and the lack of
clarity is understandable. Positive identication generally
requires good images of perched individuals and often
requires in-hand examination of structural details—such
as, on males, the shape of the hamules or extent of the
mesotibial keel—impossible to discern in photographs,
let alone on a free-ying individual. Still, a recent spate
of high-quality eld guides and attendant increases in
observer sophistication has combined to advance incre-
mentally our knowledge about the status and distribution
of Macromia species.
Perhaps a “poster child” for this advancement is M.
alleghaniensis, the Allegheny River Cruiser, a species easily
confused with M. illinoiensis, the Swift River Cruiser, of
either subspecies (taxonomy per Donnelly and Tennessen,
). As observers began to appreciate and discern subtle
variation in the pattern of yellow, in particular whether
yellow encircled the seventh abdominal segment (S)
completely or nearly so or the yellow antehumeral stripes
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Dragonflies including damselflies are colorful and large-eyed insects, which show remarkable sexual dimorphism, color transition, and color polymorphism. Recent comprehensive visual transcriptomics has unveiled an extraordinary diversity of opsin genes within the lineage of dragonflies. These opsin genes are differentially expressed between aquatic larvae and terrestrial adults, as well as between dorsal and ventral regions of adult compound eyes. Recent topics of color formation in dragonflies are also outlined. Non-iridescent blue color is caused by coherent light scattering from the quasiordered nanostructures, whereas iridescent color is produced by multilayer structures. Wrinkles or wax crystals sometimes enhances multilayer structural colors. Sex- and stage-specific color differences in red dragonflies is attributed to redox states of ommochrome pigments.
Article
Full-text available
Closely related sympatric species are expected to evolve strong species discrimination because of the reinforcement of mate preferences. Fitness costs of heterospecific matings are thought to be higher in females than in males, and females are therefore expected to show stronger species discrimination than males. Here, we investigated gender and species differences in sexual isolation in a sympatric species pair of Calopteryx damselflies. The genus Calopteryx is one of the classic examples of reproductive character displacement in evolutionary biology, with exaggerated interspecific differences in the amount of dark wing coloration when species become sympatric. Experimental manipulation of the extent of dark wing coloration revealed that sexual isolation results from both female and male mate discrimination and that wing melanization functions as a species recognition character. Female choice of conspecific males is entirely based on wing coloration, whereas males in one species also use other species recognition cues in addition to wing color. Stronger species discrimination ability in males is presumably an evolutionary response to an elevated male predation risk caused by conspicuous wing coloration. Gender differences in species discrimination and fitness costs of male courtship can thus shed new light on the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation and the reinforcement of mate preferences.
An unusual form of the Hoary Skimmer (Libellula nodistica) from the northern California coast ranges
  • N Arthur
Arthur, N. 2013. An unusual form of the Hoary Skimmer (Libellula nodistica) from the northern California coast ranges. Argia 25(1): 12.
Dragonflies, Behavior and Ecology of Odonata
  • P S Corbet
Corbet, P.S. 1999. Dragonflies, Behavior and Ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Dragonflies of the genus Tetragoneuria
  • W T Davis
Davis, W.T. 1933. Dragonflies of the genus Tetragoneuria. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 28(3): 87-104.
Two remarkable observations from Puerto Rico
  • H Fliedner
Fliedner, H. 2009. Two remarkable observations from Puerto Rico. Argia 21(1): 8-9.