A preview of this full-text is provided by Hogrefe Publishing.
Content available from Journal of Psychophysiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Article
Parasympathetic Concomitants
of Habitual, Spontaneous, and
Instructed Emotional Suppression
Asmir Gračanin, Igor Kardum, and Jasna Hudek-Knežević
Department of Psychology, University of Rijeka, Croatia
Abstract: The neurovisceral integration model proposes that different forms of self-regulation, including the emotional suppression, are
characterized by the activation of neural network whose workings are also reflected in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). However, most of
the previous studies failed to observe theoretically expected increases in RSA during emotional suppression. Even when such effects were
observed, it was not clear whether they resulted from specific task demands, a decrease in muscle activity, or they were the consequence of
more specific self-control processes. We investigated the relation between habitual or trait-like suppression, spontaneous, and instructed
suppression with changes in RSA during negative emotion experience. A modest positive correlation between spontaneous situational and
habitual suppression was observed across two experimental tasks. Furthermore, the results showed greater RSA increase among participants
who experienced higher negative affect (NA) increase and reported higher spontaneous suppression than among those with higher NA increase
and lower spontaneous suppression. Importantly, this effect was independent from the habitual suppression and observable facial
expressions. The results of the additional task based on experimental manipulation, rather than spontaneous use of situational suppression,
indicated a similar relation between suppression and RSA. Our results consistently demonstrate that emotional suppression, especially its
self-regulation component, is followed by the increase in parasympathetic activity.
Keywords: emotional suppression, expressive suppression, parasympathetic activity
Emotional suppression, often termed expressive suppres-
sion,is a form of emotional response modulation that
involves inhibition of ongoing emotion-expressive behavior
(Gross, 1998). It is prevalent in everyday life (Gross & John,
2003) and is more often used for downregulating negative
than positive emotions (Volokhov & Demaree, 2010). The
mechanisms and correlates of emotional suppression were
examined in correlational studies measuring habitual
suppression (e.g., Gross & John, 2003), in quasi-experimen-
tal studies measuring spontaneous suppression (e.g., Egloff,
Schmukle, Burns, & Schwerdtfeger, 2006), and in experi-
mental studies manipulating the use of suppression (e.g.,
Gross, 1998). Habitual suppression can be conceptualized
as an aggregate of reoccurring episodes of situational (most
often spontaneous) suppression. It is saturated with a trait-
like motivation to suppress emotion, which is not necessar-
ily involved in any specific episode of suppression.
Manipulated or instructed suppression differs from habitual
and spontaneous suppression because it is based on differ-
ent sources of motivation (e.g., a task given by the experi-
menter), and can be highly incongruent with a typical
behavior of an individual. A better understanding of
correlates and consequences of suppression can be reached
only by integrating the knowledge about these three types
of suppression.
Although numerous studies explored sympathetic conse-
quences of expressive suppression, there is still a lack of
research on its effects on parasympathetic activation.
Changes in parasympathetic activation are typically esti-
mated from respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), which
represents continuous fluctuations in heart rate during res-
piratory cycle, and is quantified by different measures of
heart rate variability (HRV; Appelhans & Luecken, 2006).
Acute changes in RSA are related to the changes in
emotional experience and reflect self-regulatory efforts
(Porges, Doussard-Roosevelt, Portales, & Greenspan,
1996; Thayer & Lane, 2000). Greater decrease in RSA is
linked to higher emotional arousal (Frazier, Strauss, &
Steinhauer, 2004) and stressful conditions (Segerstrom &
Solberg Nes, 2007; Thayer, Friedman, & Borkovec, 1996).
On the other hand, there are some indications that self-
regulatory processes are generally followed by the increase
in RSA (Thayer & Lane, 2000). For example, when partic-
ipants were instructed to resist eating cookies and eat
carrots instead, their RSA was significantly higher as com-
pared to the opposite instruction (Segerstrom & Solberg
Journal of Psychophysiology (2017), 31(2), 78–89 Ó2016 Hogrefe Publishing
DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000171