ArticlePDF Available

Rhinogenic Contact Point Headache - Frequently Missed Clinical Entity

Authors:
  • All India Institute of Medical SciencesBhubaneswar
  • ICMR-RMRC Bhubaneswar

Abstract and Figures

There are different anatomical situations inside the nasal cavity leading to rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH), where each contact point has its own characteristics. The precise excision of contact points by endoscopic approach in patients with RCPH is very effective and could be done carefully in selected patients. This review presents an overview of the current aspects in pathophysiology, clinical profile, and management of RCPH.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Review Article
Rhinogenic contact point headache Frequently
missed clinical entity
Santosh Kumar Swain
a,
*, Ishwar Chandra Behera
b
, Sidharth Mohanty
c
,
Mahesh Chandra Sahu
d
a
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘‘O’’ Anusandhan University, K8, Kalinganagar,
Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India
b
Department of Community Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘‘O’’ Anusandhan University, K8,
Kalinganagar, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India
c
Department of Anesthesia, Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
d
Directorate of Medical Research, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘‘O’’ Anusandhan University, K8, Kalinganagar,
Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India
1. Introduction
Headache is a common complaint by the patients in day-to-
day clinical practice and creates a distressing situation for both
patient and the physician. There are myriads of causes for
headache varying from simple tension headache, migraine,
refractory errors in eye, temperomandibular joint arthralgia,
myofacial spasm to severe brain tumors. Headaches may be
classied into primary and secondary types, where primary
headache does not have specic etiology and include
migraine, tension headache and cluster headache. Secondary
apollo medicine 13 (2016) 169–173
article info
Article history:
Received 11 June 2016
Accepted 4 August 2016
Available online 21 August 2016
Keywords:
Anatomical variations
Headache
Contact point headache
Computed tomography
abstract
Background: There are different anatomical situations inside the nasal cavity leading to
rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH), where each contact point has its own character-
istics. The precise excision of contact points by endoscopic approach in patients with RCPH
is very effective and could be done carefully in selected patients. This review presents an
overview of the current aspects in pathophysiology, clinical prole, and management of
RCPH.
Method: Relevant literature was searched from PubMed, Science direct, and Scopus data-
bases.
Results: Headache is a common clinical entity and is nearly universal in the course of
everyone's life. Pressure of two opposing mucosa in the nasal cavity without evidence of
inammation can be a cause of headache or facial pain. Minor intranasal anatomical
variation leading to mucosal contact point may be an etiological factor for causing headache
and often misdiagnosed and forgotten by clinician during evaluation of headache patients
and sometimes considered as headache of unknown etiology.
#2016 Indraprastha Medical Corporation Ltd. All rights reserved.
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 9556524887.
E-mail address: santoshvoltaire@yahoo.co.in (S.K. Swain).
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apme
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apme.2016.08.001
0976-0016/#2016 Indraprastha Medical Corporation Ltd. All rights reserved.
headache may arise owing to infections, trauma, tumor,
vascular lesions, and metabolic diseases.
1
It needs a multidis-
ciplinary approach to diagnose the causative factors for
headache. Often the rhinogenic cause of headache is undiag-
nosed; even worse, this cause is not suspected on preliminary
evaluation. Headache together with facial pain owing to nasal
origin in the absence of inammatory sinonasal pathology is a
new clinical entity that has received attention in medicine.
This is called as rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH),
which is a new terminology in medicine. Even without the
presence of sinusitis, the referred headache often due to
pressure on the nasal mucosa because of the anatomical
variations in the nose.
2
Contact point headache is a new type
of headache in the International Classication of Headache
Disorders (ICHD), supported by limited evidence. RCPH is
dened as intermittent pain localized in the periorbital and
medial canthal or temporozygomatic regions; evidence of
mucosal contact points with postural movements; cessation of
headache within 5 min following topical use of local anesthe-
sia at contact area and signicantly resolution of headache in
less than 7 days following removal of contact points.
3
Intranasal contact points denote to a contact between two
opposing intranasal mucosal surfaces. Intranasal contact
points are present in about 4% of noses.
4
Different intranasal
anatomical variations causing RCPH are given in Table 1.
Stammberger and Wolf documented the role of substance P
(SP) in RCPH. They also described that this kind of headache is
not only because of abnormal middle turbinate but also by
abnormal mucosal contact causing referred pain.
5
This review
article describes the role of anatomical variations in nose
leading to headache, which is a prudent evaluation with
diagnostic nasal endoscopy and computed tomography (CT)
scan before accurate diagnosis of rhinogenic cause of
headache. It also describes details of pathophysiology, clinical
prole, and management.
2. Pathophysiology
The pathogenesis of RCPH is still the subject of controversy by
some authors. The mechanical irritants such as pressure on
the nasal mucosa may cause release of neuropeptides through
the central orthodromic impulse and peripheral local, anti-
dromic impulse. Neuropeptides like SP and calcitonin gene
related peptide (CGRP) cause vasodilatation and edema of
mucosal membrane, which again intensies the pressure of
contact area. The release of neuropeptides from central
nervous system causes the pain sensation, which is almost
similar to migraine without aura. The duration and onset of
pain coincide with duration and beginning of the nasal cycle.
6
The middle turbinate is covered with mucosa on the lateral
nasal wall. Its anterior wall and nasal septum are supplied by
anterior ethmoidal nerve. RCPH is usually a referred pain
where two different afferent sensory neurons, one with its
receptor in the nasal cavity mucosa and other in the skin of
forehead, zygomatic, temple and medial canthal area synapse
on the same sensory neuron of sensory nucleus of trigeminal
nerve. If the receptors in the nasal mucosa are stimulated,
leading to the misinterpretation by the sensory cortex as
originated from the skin, causing referred pain to the
supraorbital or glabellar region. The cause of RCPH is
multifactorial. RCPH may result from nociceptors in the nasal
mucosa, which ends up in the sensory nucleus of the
trigeminal nerve. Pressure effect on the nasal mucosa is
associated with changes in micro vascular supply, followed by
release of biologic substances, induces pain or decreasing the
pain threshold. The contact between mucosal lining of concha
bullosa and nasal septum or the lateral wall of nose results in
release of SP, CGRP,
7
and neurokinin A.
8
These chemicals are
found in nociceptive bers in the central nervous system and
trigeminovascular system. So the contact point between
intranasal mucosa may be a cause of secondary headache
or triggering factor to primary headache.
9
This phenomenon is
also called as middle turbinate syndrome.
10
SP has a known
role in pathophysiology of contact point headache.
5
SP is a
neuropeptide that can be identied in the mucosa of the nasal
cavity. When SP is released around vascular area, vasodilata-
tion, plasma extravasation and perivascular inammation,
causing headache similar to clinical manifestations of
migraine without aura.
9
Normal nasal mucosa has a higher
concentration of SP than chronic hyper-plastic mucosa or
polypoidal tissue. This explains why contact point headaches
are almost always seen in patients without rhinosinusitis.
3. Clinical prole
Headache is a very commonly encountered clinical symptom
seen in everyone's life. Facial pain and headache due to sinus
and nasal origin in the absence of inammatory sinonasal
pathology is a clinical presentation which has received
attention in both otorhinolaryngology and neurology. Differ-
ent types of intranasal anatomical variations with mucosal
contact points can lead to RCPH. The characteristic headache
may be different in each type of intranasal anatomical
variation. Many clinicians are not well versed with these
types of clinical condition with headache. Intranasal mucosal
contact headache was added as a secondary headache
disorder in the ICHD.
11
Most relevant etiology concerned for
otolaryngologists includes anatomical variations of nose
causing secondary headache, which includes septal deviation,
septal spur, and concha bullosa.
12
Wolf and Tosum et al.
documented that nasal septal deviation and spur are causing
referred headache in the absence of inammation.
2
There are
different types of septal deviations including cartilaginous
deviation, bony deviation, bony spur, and high septal devia-
tion. The signicant RCPH is seen in septal spur (Fig. 1). Concha
Table 1 Anatomic variations noted on diagnostic nasal
endoscopy and CT scan anatomic variations.
Serial no. Anatomical variations of nose
1 Deviated nasal septum
2 Septal spur
3 Concha bullosa
4 Hypertrophied superior turbinate
5 Overpneumatised ethmoidal bulla
6 Hypertrophied agger nasi cells
7 Malformed uncinate process
8 Paradoxical middle turbinate
9 Hypertrophied inferior turbinate
apollo medicine 13 (2016) 169–173170
bullosa is hypertrophied pneumatized middle turbinate and
rarely seen in superior and inferior turbinates. The compres-
sion of middle turbinate because of congestion of nasal
mucosa or concha bullosa may cause periorbital or ocular pain
through anterior ethmoidal nerve, a branch of ophthalmic
division of fth cranial nerve.
2
The superior turbinate is often
forgotten turbinate during assessing the nasal pathology.
Superior turbinate is innervated by maxillary and ophthalmic
branches of trigeminal nerve. The facial area supplied by V1
and V2 affected with referred pain due to concha bullosa of
superior turbinate. RCPH is a referred pain which arises owing
to intranasal mucosal contact points, where a patient presents
with facial pain and headache. The intranasal mucosal points
which are seen in case of septal deviation, septal spur, concha
bullosa of middle turbinate (Fig. 2), large ethmoidal bullosa and
nasal septal bullosa (Fig. 3). If no other ndings of inamma-
tion for headache are seen, intranasal mucosal contact points
should be given due importance. RCPH is frequently seen in
septal deviations/spur followed by concha bullosa of middle
turbinates in many cases. Hypertrophied superior turbinate is
rarely seen and is often mistaken with a posterior ethmoidal
cell. The contact point between upper septum and medial
lamella of hypertrophied superior turbinate leads to headache.
The contact point headache due to hypertrophied pneuma-
tised superior turbinate usually causes pain over forehead,
medial, and lateral canthus. Sometimes medialized middle
turbinate causes mucosal contact with nasal septum. Creating
a space between middle turbinate and septum is needed for
reversing this situation. This is done by trimming the parts of
middle turbinate. Bulla ethmoidalis is the large anterior
ethmoidal air cells and when it is larger than normal; its
medial surface may push the middle turbinate and may cause
a contact with nasal septum. To reverse this situation, anterior
ethmoidectomy and lateralization of middle turbinate are
needed. Hypertrophied bulla ethmoidalis pushing the middle
turbinate leading to contact between nasal septum and middle
turbinate causing contact point headache. In RCPH, no
features of sinusitis like purulent nasal discharge, postnasal
drip, and foul smelling are seen.
4. Management
Headaches are the most frequent causes for patients to seek
medical attention and one of the largest factors for disability in
the community. Early management of headache helps a
patient to protect from disability. Multidisciplinary approach is
always a need for diagnosis and treatment of headache.
Headache without evidence of inammation in nose and
[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]
Fig. 1 Endoscopic picture showing septal spur.
[(Fig._2)TD$FIG]
Fig. 2 Endoscopic picture showing concha bullosa of
middle turbinate.
[(Fig._3)TD$FIG]
Fig. 3 CT scan of paranasal sinus showing nasal septal
bullosa.
apollo medicine 13 (2016) 169–173 171
paranasal sinuses is usually examined by neurophyscians,
ophthalmologist, otolaryngologists, dentist, and internist to
exclude other causes of headache such as neuralgia, temporal
arteritis, and vascular headache.
13
Evaluation of intranasal
contact points should be thoroughly done by otolaryngolo-
gists. The combination of diagnostic nasal endoscopy and CT
scan provides maximum information for the diagnosis of
RCPH.
14
Diagnostic nasal endoscopy in conjunction with CT
scan has proven to be ideal combination for diagnosis of
sinonasal pathology. Anatomical variations such as septal
deviation, septal spurs, concha bullosa (Fig. 4), hypertrophied
inferior turbinate, medialized middle turbinate, uncinate
bulla, medially or laterally bent uncinate process, paradoxi-
cally middle turbinate, and large ethmoidal bulla are best
assessed by CT scan and diagnostic nasal endoscopy which are
often cause for contact headache. However, there exist
limitations in diagnosis, as characteristic headache should
be relieved after application of local anesthetics, which is
usually not done in all cases of headaches. In one study of
30 patients with applications of local anesthetic agents, 43%
showed complete recovery, 47% showed slight improvement,
and 10% showed no improvement.
2
This is why RCPH are
properly diagnosed by endoscopic examination and CT scan to
rule out differential diagnosis. Different anatomical variations
of nose causing contact point headaches are given in Table 1.
After identication of contact points, RCPH can be treated with
surgical management.
13
After evolution of endoscopic sinus
surgery, many authors described different techniques such as
partial turbinectomy and turbinoplasty aiming to decrease
contact point headache and minimize postoperative syne-
chia.
15
The limited endoscopic sinus surgery is a useful
surgical technique which helps to remove the contact points
(Table 2). Patients with deviated nasal septum (DNS) or septal
spur need septoplasty or spurectomy, which causes removal of
mucosal contact points. In case of concha bullosa, concho-
plasty is done by resecting the lateral wall of superior or
middle turbinate. In case of large bulla ethmoidalis, anterior
ethmoidectomy is usually a best option to remove the contact
points. For inferior turbinate hypertrophy, turbinoplasty or
conservative partial turbinectomy are done to release the
nasal obstruction and helping to remove the intranasal
mucosal contact points. Few authors described treatment of
contact point headaches using transaction of fth cranial
nerve or injection of Gasserian ganglion by alcohol or
novocaine.
3
Before the era of endoscopic sinus surgery,
complete removal of middle turbinate was done to manage
concha bullosa. After evolution of endoscopic sinus surgery,
techniques such as partial turbinectomy and turbinoplasty are
practiced aiming to relieve the contact point headaches.
16
Septal spur has a signicant relation with headache in case
RCPH. Other than septal spur and hypertrophied middle
turbinate, contact point headache may also cause by the
contact between the septum and superior turbinate or medial
wall of the ethmoidal sinus.
13
Nose has a diverse anatomical
variation. Relation between these anatomical variations and
contact point headache was conrmed in septal spur, septal
deviations, concha bullosa, and large ethmoidal bulla. So
above lesions should not be ignored from mind during
evaluation of headache and their respective treatment helps
to relief the symptoms. Some anatomical variations of nose,
which cause RCPH, are given below with its treatment.
4.1. DNS
DNS is the most common anatomical variation of nose.
17
It has
been reported that DNS and septal spur may cause referred
headache and facial pain in absence of inammation.
2
DNS
along with variation of middle turbinate is a major contributor
for contact point headache.
2
DNS along with hypertrophic
rhinitis is also a major concern for nasal obstruction, leading to
headache. Patient will get maximum benet from septoplasty
surgery.
4.2. Concha bullosa
Concha bullosa is the hypertrophied pneumatized middle
turbinate. Concha bullosa occupies the space between the
lateral wall of nose and nasal septum, cause large areas of
extensive mucosal contact. Intranasal mucosal contact
between enlarged middle turbinate or superior turbinate
and nasal septum may lead to stimulation of sensory
component of trigeminal nerve, causing RCPH. Concha
bullosa causes impairment of ventilation of sinuses if it
[(Fig._4)TD$FIG]
Fig. 4 CT scan of paranasal sinus showing bilateral concha
bullosa showing contact points.
Table 2 Mini functional endoscopic sinus surgery
procedures applied to patients with RCPH.
Serial no. Surgical procedure
1 Septoplasty
2 Septal spur resection (spurectomy)
3 Lateral resection of concha bullosa
4 Subtotal resection of concha
bullosa
5 Segmental resection of concha
bullosa
6 Submucosal resection of
hypertrophied inferior turbinate
7 Excision of overpneumatised bulla
(anterior ethmoidectomy)
apollo medicine 13 (2016) 169–173172
blocks the osteomeatal complex area leading to vaccum
headache and often predisposes sinusitis. Concha bullosa of
middle turbinate results in periorbital or ocular pain through
anterior ethmoidal nerve, which is a branch of ophthalmic
division of trigeminal nerve.
2
4.3. Prominent ethmoid bulla
This is the largest, anterior most, and consistent ethmoid air
cells. The ethmoid bulla can be extensively pneumatized and
hypertrophied causing contact to the middle turbinate. This is
treated surgically with the help of endoscope. The endoscopic
conchoplasty can be done for removing contact point between
two apposing nasal mucosa.
4.4. Agger nasi cells
These are the most anterior extramural ethmoid air cells, seen
anterior superior to the attachment of middle turbinate at the
lateral wall of nose. Hyperpneumatised agger nasi cells may
cause contact to nasal septal mucosa, followed by contact
headache. This is treated surgically by an endoscopic approach.
5. Conclusion
Headache due to contact of nasal mucosa is often considered
as an exclusion of diagnosis. RCPH should be included in
the list of differential diagnosis of headache, and it should be
properly investigated so that the management will be effective
and appropriate. The outcome of this study highlights that
diagnostic nasal study and CT scan are important tools in the
diagnosis of anatomical variations of nose causing contact
point headache. Anatomical variations such as DNS, nasal
spur, concha bullosa, hypertrophied inferior turbinate, med-
ialized middle turbinate, and septal bullosa are important
causes for a headache. Nose has a diverse anatomical
variation. DNS and/or septal spur are common anatomical
variations of the nose causing contact point headache
followed by concha bullosa and enlarged bulla ethmoidalis.
Relation of anatomical variations with headache should not be
ignored during decision making for headache management.
Conicts of interest
The authors have none to declare.
references
1. Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache: a clinical
conundrum. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2004;37:267288.
2. Tosun F, Gerek M, Ozkaptan Y. Nasal surgery for contact
point headaches. Headache. 2000;40:237240.
3. Albirmawy OA, Elsherif HS, Shehata EM, Younes A. Middle
turbinate evacuation conchoplasty in management of
contact-point rhinogenic headache in children. Int J Clin
Pediatr. 2010;1(45):115123.
4. Peric A, Baletic N, Sotirovic J. A case of an uncommon
anatomic variation of the middle turbinate associated with
headache. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010;30:156159.
5. Roozbahany NA, Nasri S. Nasal and paranasal sinus
anatomical variations in patients with rhinogenic contact
point headache. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013;40:177183.
6. Stammberger H, Wolf G. Headaches and sinus disease: the
endoscopic approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.
1988;134:323.
7. Durham PL. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and
migraine. Headache. 2006;46(suppl 1):38.
8. Goadsby PJ, Hoskin KL, Storer RJ, Edvinsson L, Connor HE.
Adenosine A1 receptor agonists inhibit trigeminovascular
nociceptive transmission. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 6):13921401.
9. Behin F, Lipton RB, Bigal M. Migraine and intranasal contact
point headache: is there any connection? Curr Pain Headache
Rep. 2006;10(4):312315.
10. Anselmo-Lima WT, De Oliveira JA, Speciali JG, et al. Middle
turbinate headache syndrome. Headache. 1997;37:102106.
11. Headache Classication Committee of the International
Headache Society: the international classication of
headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(suppl 1):1160.
12. Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus problems as a cause of
headache refractoriness and migraine chronication. Curr
Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13:319325.
13. Behin F, Behin B, Behin D, Baredes S. Surgical management
of contact point headaches. Headache. 2005;45:204210.
14. Huang HH, Lee TJ, Huang CC, Chang PH. Non-sinusitis
related rhinogenous headache: a ten-year experience. Am J
Otolaryngol. 2008;29:326332.
15. Sigston EA, Iseli CE, Iseli TA. Concha bullosa: reducing
middle meatal adhesions by preserving the lateral
mucosa as a posterior pedicle ap. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118
(10):799803.
16. Behin F, Behin B, Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Surgical treatment of
patients with refractory migraine headaches and intranasal
contact points. Cephalalgia. 2005;25(6):439443.
17. Gerbe RW, Fry TL, Fischer ND. Headache of nasal spur origin:
an easily diagnosed and surgically correctable cause of facial
pain. Headache. 1984;24:329330.
apollo medicine 13 (2016) 169–173 173
... The diagnosis of the nasolabial cyst is usually done based on clinical presentations, imaging findings, and histopathological studies. [19] When the nasolabial cysts are small and uncomplicated, the diagnosis is often difficult for clinicians. Radiological examinations are very important for differentiating the diagnosis of the odontogenic and nonodontogenic cysts in the nasolabial area. ...
... Radiological examinations are very important for differentiating the diagnosis of the odontogenic and nonodontogenic cysts in the nasolabial area. [19] There is often no bone erosion in the early stage of the disease. [20] The safety of the teeth in the nasolabial area is clinically important for differentiating from other pathologies. ...
Article
Full-text available
The nasolabial cyst is a soft-tissue cyst, nonodontogenic in origin that occurs in the sublabial area and anterior maxillary region. The nasolabial cyst is a rare lesion found behind the ala nasi, extending backward into the inferior meatus of the nasal cavity and forward into the labio-gingival sulcus. The patient with nasolabial cyst often presents with painless swelling and sometimes nasal obstruction. The diagnosis of nasolabial cyst is usually diagnosed in an early stage due to cosmetic facial deformity. The final diagnosis of the nasolabial cyst needs a correlation of the clinical presentations, surgical findings, and histopathological information. There are several treatment options described for the treatment of nasolabial cysts. The current treatment of choice for nasolabial cyst is complete excision through sublabial approach. The postoperative complications may include facial/perinasal swelling, facial numbness, and toothache. The postoperative chance of recurrence is rare. The objective of this review article is to familiarize the readers with this uncommon clinical entity such as nasolabial cyst with its prevalence, etiopathology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.
... Topical nasal decongestant or steroids can relieve the RCPH, however, the long-term relieve needs surgical interventions. [29] The topical nasal steroid improves the patency of the nasal cavity on short-term basis. [30] Endoscopic surgery is an ideal technique to relieve mucosal contact point headache. ...
... [30] Endoscopic surgery is an ideal technique to relieve mucosal contact point headache. [29] Endoscopic surgical treatment offers superior visualization of the intranasal mucosal contact points, which is important for limited resection of the mucosal contacts and allows for a more controlled and precise surgery with minimal injury to the adjacent mucosa. The surgery is usually performed under general anesthesia. ...
Article
Full-text available
Headache is a universal symptom in the course of everyone's life. There are myriads of causes for headache ranging from simple migraine, tension headache, refractory errors in the eye, temporomandibular joint arthralgia, and myofascial spasm to severe form of headache by brain tumors. The anatomical variations in the nasal cavity result in mucosal contact between the opposing surface and cause rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH). RCPH is a new type of headache in medical literature. The pathogenesis of the RCPH is still the subject of controversy. Nose has diverse anatomical variations. Deviated nasal septum or spur, middle turbinate concha bullosa, and enlarged bulla ethmoidalis are the common anatomical variation in the nasal cavity which can cause RCPH. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy and computed tomography scan are helpful to confirm the mucosal contact points inside the nasal cavity. The precise excision of the contact points with the help of endoscopic approach in patients of RCPH is very effective. Clinicians should not ignore the anatomical variation of the nasal cavity during management of the headache. There is not much literature for RCPH indicating that this clinical entity is neglected. This review article presents an overview of the current aspect of RCPH.
... Swain et al. discussed the often-overlooked issue of contact point headaches, providing insights into its diagnosis and management in clinical practice. [16] 17 Ganapathy explored the potential applications of the Metaverse in healthcare, particularly in training, education, and telehealth, presenting a forward-looking view of how immersive technology could transform the medical field. [20] conclusion Apollo Medicine has consistently provided a platform for highimpact research that addresses critical health challenges. ...
Article
Full-text available
For 20 years, Apollo Medicine has been a platform for sharing transformative research. We are proud to celebrate two decades of research by highlighting our top 20 most cited articles. Apollo Medicine has consistently provided a platform for high-impact research that addresses critical health challenges. These top-cited articles reflect the journal’s commitment to advancing medical knowledge and improving patient care. As we celebrate 20 years of excellence in medical research, we remain dedicated to promoting innovation and collaboration in healthcare.
... 11 These structures are lined by ciliated epithelium similar to the respiratory tract. 12 The complex anatomy of the craniofacial area may limit the routine visualization of the sinonasal tract in the diagnosis and also the ability of the surgeon to get a tumor-free margin. MRI is vital to establish the presence or absence of factors that decide the respectability such as invasion of the orbit, perineural invasion of the tumor, skull base invasion, intracranial invasion, and spread to the masticator and parapharyngeal space by the tumor. ...
Article
Full-text available
The last several years have seen a considerable advancement in the treatment of sinonasal diseases. The advent of minimally invasive functional endoscopic sinus surgery has led to an increased understanding of the anatomy and function of the sinonasal region, making previously inaccessible areas safe to operate in. The advancement in imaging of the sinonasal tract has been associated with the evolution of endoscopic sinus surgery. The imaging of sinonasal pathology has progressed from conventional radiographs (plain films) to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Technological advancements in CT and MRI have given a precise differential diagnosis and greater detail about the anatomical extent of sinonasal pathologies. Because the high water content of the inflammatory state causes a markedly enhanced signal on T2-weighted scans, MRI can currently distinguish between retained secretions and inflammatory responses from the mass of the tumor. The invasive lesions affecting the soft tissues outside of the sinonasal region are more easily distinguished by MRI. MRI largely took the position of CT scan for malignant sinonasal lesions due to its superior capacity to distinguish between inflammation and tumor and its increased sensitivity for intracranial extension. MRI can be more useful than a CT scan in demonstrating the degree of soft tissue abnormalities and in identifying lesions that have returned after surgery.
... Before performing a CT radiographs have been used to image the nasolabial cyst. [16] CT is helpful to determine whether the cyst is hyperdense or hypodense, homogenous, non-odontogenic, with or without any bony erosion. [12] In MRI, the nasolabial cyst is described as a homogeneous mass with varying intensities with respect to T1-and T2-weighted images that do not enhance with contrast. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Nasolabial cysts are non-odontogenic cysts that arise from the nasal alar area. Sublabial resection of the nasolabial cyst is considered an effective surgical modality of treatment. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of nasolabial cyst at a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India. Methods This was a retrospective study of 38 cases of nasolabial cysts managed between May 2018 and June 2022. The detailed clinical presentations, investigations and treatment of nasolabial cysts of the patients were studied. Results Out of 38 cases of the nasolabial cyst, 22 (57.9%) were seen on the left side, 13 (34.2%) were seen on the right side and 3 were seen bilaterally. The most common presenting complaint was facial swelling (84.2%). Computed tomography of the nose and paranasal sinuses was done in 24/38 (70.5%) patients studied. Surgical excision of the nasolabial cysts was done by intraoral sublabial approach in 32 (84.2%) cases and 6 underwent endoscopic transnasal marsupialisation. The most common post-operative complication was post-operative facial/perinasal swelling. One case of recurrence was reported who underwent endoscopic transnasal marsupialisation. Conclusions Nasolabial cysts are an uncommon clinical entity but manifest cosmetic deformity and nasal obstruction. Intraoral sublabial excision and endoscopic transnasal marsupialisation are important surgical techniques for the nasolabial cyst. The post-operative complications and chance of recurrence are rare.
... The goal of the treatment is to eliminate or reduce the present symptoms and prevent future attacks and complications. 11 Appropriate treatment selection should have minimal adverse effects and enable the patient to maintain a normal lifestyle. The treatment options include allergen avoidance, pharmacotherapy, and immunotherapy. ...
Article
Full-text available
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E-mediated inflammatory reaction in the nasal mucosa caused by inhaled allergens such as dust, pollen, mold, or animal dander. AR is a common chronic disease that is often ignored, misdiagnosed, and/or mistreated. Clinically, AR is characterized by four major symptoms such as rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal itching, and nasal congestion. It can be associated with certain co-morbid conditions like asthma and nasal polyposis. AR is diagnosed by taking proper history taking, nasal examination, and allergy tests. A proper understanding of the pathophysiology of AR can lead to improved treatment of this disorder. The treatment for AR should target symptoms to improve the quality of life for patients. Undertreatment of AR often impairs quality of life. The important concern in the treatment of AR is the patient’s adherence to the treatment. Novel treatments are needed for cheaper, early, better, and more permanent symptom resolution in AR. Evidence-based guidelines for AR treatment are helpful to improve disease control. The treatment of AR includes avoidance of relevant allergens, appropriate pharmacotherapy, immunotherapy, patient education, and follow-up. Intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective modality of treatment for AR. This review article discusses details of current treatment options for AR.
... FESS has been widely accepted for the treatment of ACPs in children. [44] It includes excision of the polyp(trans-nasally or trans-orally depending on the size) and treatment of the obstructed osteomeatal complex. Other external approaches are the Caldwell Luc procedure, mini-Caldwell Luc, or trans-canine sinuscopy can be used alone or associated with endoscopic surgery. ...
Article
Full-text available
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. Abstract Antrochoanal polyp (ACP) or Killian polyp originates from the inflamed and edematous mucosa of the maxillary sinus. The etiopathogenesis of the ACPs is not clear. It has two components such as antral one which is always cystic and the nasal part is solid. The expanded intramural cyst enlarges to the point that it completely occupies the maxillary sinus, emerging through the natural ostium into the nasal cavity and extending towards the choana. The common clinical presentations are nasal obstruction and nasal discharge. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)are needed for making the diagnosis and the treatment planning. Surgery is indicated for the treatment of ACP. The endoscopic technique consists of an uncinectomy and resection of the polyp and its attachment to the maxillary sinus via a wide middle meatal antrostomy. Endoscopic sinus surgery via middle meatal antrostomy combined with trans-canine sinuscopy ensures the complete removal of the antral part of the ACP in children. The use of a microdebrider through the canine fossa is helpful to resect a broad attachment of the ACP in the maxillary sinus and it may be indicated as complementary to endoscopic sinus surgery. Simple avulsion of the ACP has a high chance of recurrence, whereas the Caldwell Luc procedure is associated with damage to the maxillary and dental growth centers. More research is needed for establishing the exact etiopathology and newer treatment options for ACPs.
... Although the basic phenotypic diagnostic criteria have been established, the specific diagnostic criteria and treatment approach are still evolving as our knowledge of CRS grows. 3,4 Patients with face pain can be difficult to diagnose. The frequency of referred pain and overlap in symptoms between different illnesses provide therapeutic challenges; painful stimuli affecting face structures are largely transferred by afferents in the trigeminal nerve to the spinal tract in the brain stem. ...
... 41 The surgical excisions of the pinna schwannoma are operated with a traditional approach, separating the tumor from the underlying perichondrium. 42 It has a true capsule forming a smooth surface under the skin which facilitates dissection during surgery. 43 The mass should be completely excised and often done under local anesthesia in adult patients with preservation of the overlying skin. ...
Article
Full-text available
Schwannomas are uncommon and benign neurogenic tumors that originate from the nerve sheath of the myelinated nerves. It can be found in any peripheral, cranial or autonomic nerves which contain Schwann cells. It is also called neuroma, nerve sheath tumor and neurilemmoma. Schwannomas in the head and neck region often present as painless swelling. The growth of schwannoma of the pinna causes an aesthetic alteration of the pinna. Schwannoma is a rare tumor of the pinna. The diagnosis of schwannoma is confirmed by histopathological study and immunohistochemistry. Histopathologically, it shows encapsulated, well-circumscribed lesions composed of different cellular patterns and arrangements. Histologically, the hallmark of schwannomas is the pattern of alternating Antoni A and Antoni B areas. The treatment of choice for schwannoma of the pinna is complete surgical excision. Recurrence following complete excision of the schwannoma is rare. Because of their rarity, these tumors are often not included in the differential diagnosis of the mass on the pinna. Preoperative suspicion and awareness are very important for schwannoma of the pinna to avoid delayed diagnosis and treatment. There is not much literature on the schwannoma of the pinna, indicating that this clinical entity is neglected. The objective of this article was to provide a comprehensive review of the schwannoma of the pinna including its epidemiology, etiopathology, clinical presentations, diagnosis and treatment.
Article
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an IgE-mediated atopic disease that occurs due to inhaled antigens in the immediate phase. Misdiagnosis, insufficient treatment, or no treatment at all are frequent problems associated with the widespread condition known as chronic allergic rhinitis. AR symptoms include runny, itchy, stuffy, and sneezing noses. Asthma and nasal polyps, for example, sometimes occur simultaneously in patients. In order for people living with AR to be as comfortable and productive as possible, treatment should center on reducing their symptoms. The online sources and literature, such as Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and Medline, were reviewed to gather information regarding therapeutic modalities of AR and evidence-based treatments for the disease as the objectives of the present study. An increasing number of people are suffering from AR, resulting in a heavy financial and medical burden on healthcare systems around the world. Undertreating AR frequently results in a decline in quality of life. Treatment compliance is a critical challenge in the administration of AR. Innovative therapies are needed for RA to provide patients with symptom alleviation that is less expensive, more effective, and longer duration of action. Evidence-based guidelines are helpful for managing AR illness. Treating AR according to evidence-based standards can help in disease management. AR treatment includes allergen avoidance, drug therapy, immunotherapy, patient education, and follow-up. However, AR treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is more popular. Hence, in this review article, treatment options for AR are discussed in depth. We also discussed the incidence, causes, and new treatments for this clinical condition.
Article
Full-text available
Headache due to the pressure of nasal mucosa in the absence of inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses is a clinical entity that has gained wide acceptance. Concha bullosa is the most commonly observed anatomical variation of the lateral nasal wall. The case is presented of a 31-year-old female with a history of intermittent frontal headache and bilateral nasal obstruction in whom we found the concha bullosa containing another, smaller concha bullosa inside. This is the first report of a case in which both outer and inner concha bullosa were septated (with two air cells inside). After resecting the lateral portion of outer concha bullosa and removing the inner concha bullosa, the patient reported no further headaches. The differential diagnosis of the variations of the middle turbinate and the relationships between the anatomic variations and pathophysiology of contact point headaches are discussed herewith.
Article
Objective: To define anatomical variations that may lead to rhinogenic contact point headache. Methods: Paranasal sinuses CT scan and medical records of sixty-five patients who underwent a successful endoscopic surgery for rhinogenic contact point headache reviewed. Results: Eleven distinct anatomical variations were found in patients with rhinogenic contact point headache. All of them were surgically curable. Conclusion: There are multiple anatomical situations that may lead to rhinogenic contact point headache and each one has its own characteristics. Treatment plan should be personalized for every patient considering the diagnosed anatomical variation.
Article
Sinus headache is not a diagnostic term supported by the academia, yet it appears to be understood by the general public and larger medical community. It can be considered both a primary and secondary headache disorder. As a primary headache disorder, most of the patients considered to have sinus headache indeed have migraine (migraine with sinus symptoms). Yet it is also possible that some attacks of sinus headache may represent a unique clinical phenotype of migraine or be a unique clinical entity. Potentially, primary sinus headache can chronify and be refractory through immune-mediated mechanisms or as a catalyst for migraine chronification through ineffective treatment or medication overuse and misuse. As a secondary headache disorder, sinus headache can be associated with a wide range of underlying etiologies such as infection, anatomical abnormalities, trauma, and immunological disease or sleep disorders. It is possible that these underlying pathophysiological processes generate long-standing activation of nociceptive mechanisms involved in headache and can lead to chronification and refractoriness of the headache symptomatology. This article explores some of the potential mechanisms and the available scientific studies that may explain how sinus headache can become chronic and present to the clinician as a refractory headache disorder.
Article
This study aimed to investigate the role of anatomical abnormalities in non-sinusitis-related rhinogenous headache and to evaluate response to surgery. Between January 1995 and December 2004, 71 patients were diagnosed with non-sinusitis-related rhinogenous headache preoperatively and treated with endoscopic sinus surgery and/or septoplasty if other underlying diseases could be ruled out and if long-term medical treatment failed. Data from this group were analyzed retrospectively. Multiple sinonasal anomalies were noted by endoscopy and sinus computed tomographic scans in the 66 patients in the study. These included nasal septum deviation in 46 (69.7%), concha bullosum in 33 (48.5%), and Haller cell in 11 (16.7%). Thirty of the patients with nasal septum deviation needed surgical intervention. Fifty-four (81.8%) of the 66 patients in the study showed significant improvement after surgery and did not require further medical therapy. Our experience demonstrates that non-sinusitis-related rhinogenous headache can be significantly minimized with surgical management, as long as a precise identification of the etiologic anatomical factor can be made.
Article
Headaches can be of sinugenic origin even if this cause may not be suspected from the case history. Endoscopy of the lateral nasal wall with rigid cold light endoscopes in combination with polytomography or computed tomography usually will reveal the underlying causes hidden from the unaided eye, the operating microscope, and standard x-ray examination. Small lesions in the lesser cells of the ethmoid complex may give rise to headaches, especially when located in the key areas of the ethmoid infundibulum or frontal recess. Many anatomic variations of the structures in the middle meatus can narrow the stenotic clefts even more and thus predispose to more or less intense contact of opposing mucosal surfaces. This may impede or block ventilation and drainage of the ethmoid and surrounding larger sinuses and thus affect those as well. After identification of these underlying causes, functional endoscopic sinus surgery with usually minimal operations often can provide dramatic relief of symptoms that may have been present for months or even years. The neuropeptides recently were newly identified as a group of mediators besides the neurotransmitters noradrenalin and acetylcholine. Substance P (SP) is one of the most important neuropeptides that we can identify in the human nasal mucosa. It mediates pain impulses to the cortex via afferent C fibers. Simultaneously from polymodal receptors in the nasal mucosa, local reflexes are mediated by SP via an axon reflex, causing vasodilatation, plasma extravasation ("neurogenic edema"), and hypersecretion. The receptors can be stimulated by chemical and caloric irritants and also mechanical irritants such as pressure. The pressure exerted on nasal mucosa by polyps or mucosal swelling due to other reasons in the ethmoid clefts, cells, and narrow spaces apparently can be enough to trigger an SP-mediated pain sensation via afferent C fibers. Over the axon reflex an initially small lesion may lead in a vicious circle to quite significant symptoms. The model of "referred pain" explains why the pain is not necessarily felt at its origin, but may be projected onto corresponding dermatomes. The pain-mediating function of SP can be blocked selectively by capsaicin, the pungent component of red pepper, which leads to desensitization of the receptors and degeneration of the afferent C fibers without affecting other sensory qualities. In patients with vasomotor rhinitis we were able to block all the patients' symptoms including headaches by topical administration of capsaicin. After identification of underlying causes with endoscopy and CT, lesions and contact areas should be operated upon if medical treatment fails.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Article
SYNOPSIS Intranasal spur pathology is presented as an easily diagnosed and readily correctable cause of facial pain within the confines of proper diagnostic evaluation and thorough elimination of other more serious causes of facial pain and headache.
Article
The middle turbinate and nasal septum are innervated by the anterior ethmoidal nerve, a branch of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve. As reported in the classical work of Wolff (1948), stimulation of these regions causes pain in the medial canthus of the supraorbital region. Periorbital pain due to middle turbinate compression against the septum or the lateral wall of the nose may be due to congestion of the nasal mucosa or to pneumatization of the middle turbinate (concha bullosa). The diagnosis is made by exclusion and requires a high index of suspicion, anterior rhinoscopy, computerized tomography (CT), and confirmation by the lidocaine test. We present five cases of middle turbinate headache syndrome, all with concha bullosa. Four were treated surgically by partial middle turbinectomy and septoplasty more than 1 year ago, with excellent results. One patient refused surgical treatment which was suggested after failure of medical treatment with antihistamines, decongestants, and a topical corticosteroid, and continues to be symptomatic. Despite the small number of cases studied, the authors concluded that the procedure used was effective for the resolution of headache.