A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Abdominal Radiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Is pelvic MRI in women presenting with pelvic
endometriosis suggestive of associated ileal,
appendicular, or cecal involvement?
He
´le
`ne Gimonet ,
1
Vale
´rie Laigle-Que
´rat,
1
Ste
´phane Ploteau,
2
Cergika Veluppillai,
2
Brice Lecle
`re,
3
Eric Frampas
1
1
Service de radiologie et imagerie me
´dicale, Hoˆ tel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 1 place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes, France
2
Service de gyne
´cologie-obste
´trique, Hoˆ pital Femme-enfant-adolescent, CHU de Nantes, 38 boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes,
France
3
Service d’e
´valuation me
´dicale et d’e
´pide
´miologie, Hoˆ pital St Jacques, CHU de Nantes, 85 rue St Jacques, 44093 Nantes, France
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether deep pelvic endometriosis
or endometriomas diagnosed at pelvic MRI are associ-
ated with extrapelvic bowel endometriosis (EPBE) (ileal,
appendicular, or cecal involvement) in order to suggest
criteria for performing an additional imaging examina-
tion dedicated to the assessment of EPBE.
Methods: Ninety-six patients operated on for deep pelvic
endometriosis were retrospectively included. They were
classified in two groups according to the presence of
surgically and histologically proven EPBE. According to
pelvic endometriotic lesions described on the preopera-
tive pelvic MRI, a logistic regression analysis was
performed to evaluate a possible association between
EPBE and pelvic endometriosis.
Results: Eleven patients had EPBE (5 appendicular, 2
cecal, and 4 ileocecal lesions) at surgery. In adjusted
models, involvement of the right ureter, rectosigmoid,
and sigmoid localizations were statistically associated
with EPBE with adjusted OR of 9.13 (95%CI
1.98–42.19), 5.8 (95%CI 1.12–30.07), and 6.74 (95%CI
1.23–36.77), respectively.
Conclusions: Further imaging evaluation to assess ileal,
appendicular, or cecal endometriosis should be proposed
in case of sigmoid or rectosigmoid endometriosis diag-
nosed at pelvic MRI. A right ureteral lesion diagnosed
preoperatively should be considered carefully as its
association with EPBE is not described so far.
Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging—Deep
infiltrating endometriosis—Bowel—Sigmoid—Ileocecal
Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that af-
fects more than 10%of reproductive-age women. It is
characterized by development of endometrial-like tissue
outside of the uterine cavity and is commonly associated
with chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Deep infiltrating
endometriosis is associated with more severe symptoms
(dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschesia, meno- and
metrorrhagia, dysuria…)[1–3].
One of the most serious associated sites of
endometriosis is the intestinal tract, which occurs in
22%–56%of women with deep pelvic endometriosis [4–
6], and may manifest with cramping abdominal pain,
diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and
symptoms suggestive of bowel occlusion. Bowel
endometriosis affects the rectum and sigmoid in 31%–
56%of cases [4,5,7]. Less frequent sites are caecum,
distal ileum, and appendix defined as extrapelvic bowel
endometriosis (EPBE) which are found in 4.1%–10.7%,
4.7%–2.7%, and 6.4%–10.7%of women with deep infil-
trating endometriosis, respectively. Bowel endometriosis
is reported to be multifocal in one third of the cases, and
one fourth of the pelvic bowel endometriosis are associ-
ated with EPBE [4]. Surgical treatment of deep infiltrat-
ing endometriosis, particularly when the rectosigmoid
is involved, entails a risk of complication such as recto-
vaginal fistula, pelvic abscess, and transient urinary
retention or dysuria [8–10]. However, a complete resection
of all endometriotic implants offers the best long-term
symptomatic relief. The balance between the benefits and
Correspondence to: He
´le
`ne Gimonet; email: helene.gimonet@hotmail.fr
ª
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
Published online: 3 September 2016
Abdominal
Radiology
Abdom Radiol (2016) 41:2404–2410
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0884-7
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.