ResearchPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Agroforestry is increasingly recognized as having a central role in sustainable agriculture. Research has shown that trees can deliver multiple benefits in agriculture – from combating climate change and con- tributing to food production and household nutrition, to providing sustainable fuel and timber (Mbow et al, 2014; Righe et al, 2014). Women farmers – who are often responsible for managing trees, especially at the early stages of establishment – are key players in agroforestry systems (Kiptot, et al, 2014). Yet women’s roles in tree-based agricultural production and the complex gender relations that shape deci- sion-making have received minimal research attention. The World Development Report, published by the World Bank in 2012, states that gender equality is a core development objective in its own right. Increased focus on gender equality in production systems can transform agricultural livelihoods, improve development outcomes and make institutional cultures more enabling. This strategy and action plan approaches gender as a crosscutting element in agroforestry research and development and as a strategic research focus. It is aligned and contributes to the CGIAR strategies for integration of gender in research, at the consortium level and at the level of the different Consortium Research Programmes (CRPs) in which ICRAF participates. Integrating gender in ICRAF’s research will pave the way for scientists to improve their understanding of gender and facilitate the development of critical capacities to generate more and better quality research on gender and equity. This strategy and action plan systematically articulates key mechanisms and processes required to improve gender in agroforestry research and development. It also lays out a roadmap and action points to accomplish the objectives of the strategy. Objectives of the gender strategy: • Raise awareness and understanding of the importance of gender integration in agroforestry research and development in ICRAF and among partners through relevant gender sensitization and training; • Enhance gender research capacity in ICRAF and among partners through provision of expertise and robust tools; • Mobilize adequate resources to support the goals of this strategy and drive ICRAF’s vision of rural transformation in the developing world as smallholders increase their use of trees in agricultural landscapes to improve food security, incomes, health and environmental sustainability; • Generate a co-learning cycle between gender research and development practice and ensure that gender dimensions are fully integrated in negotiation support for relevant agroforestry landscapes.
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
Gender Strategy
and Action Plan
ii
The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) is one of the 15 Centres of the CGIAR Consortium. ICRAF¹s
headquarters are in Nairobi, Kenya, with eight regional and subregional ofces located in China,
India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Peru and Cameroon. We conduct research in 28 other
countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America.
Our vision is a rural transformation in the developing world as smallholder households increase their
use of trees in agricultural landscapes to improve food security, nutrition, income, health, shelter,
social cohesion, energy resources and environmental sustainability.
The Centre’s mission is to generate science-based knowledge about the diverse roles that trees
play in agricultural landscapes, and to use its research to advance policies and practices, and their
implementation that benet the poor and the environment.
The World Agroforestry Centre is guided by the broad development challenges pursued by the
CGIAR. These include poverty alleviation that entails enhanced food security and health, improved
productivity with lower environmental and social costs, and resilience in the face of climate change
and other external shocks.
All photos © Worlld Agroforestry Centre
© World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya, November 2015, Gender Strategy and Action Plan.
Lead authors: Margaret Kroma and Ana Maria Paez Valencia
Contributors: Patti Kristjanson, Evelyn Kiptot, Delia Catacutan, Christine Jost and Farhat Naz
Cover page: Collens Mwinga, a farmer from Cameroon and his family have Plenty to smile about.
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
iii
Executive summary
Agroforestry is increasingly recognized as having a central role in sustainable agriculture. Research has
shown that trees can deliver multiple benets in agriculture – from combating climate change and con-
tributing to food production and household nutrition, to providing sustainable fuel and timber (Mbow et
al, 2014; Righe et al, 2014). Women farmers – who are often responsible for managing trees, especially
at the early stages of establishment – are key players in agroforestry systems (Kiptot, et al, 2014). Yet
women’s roles in tree-based agricultural production and the complex gender relations that shape deci-
sion-making have received minimal research attention.
The World Development Report, published by the World Bank in 2012, states that gender equality is a
core development objective in its own right. Increased focus on gender equality in production systems
can transform agricultural livelihoods, improve development outcomes and make institutional cultures
more enabling. This strategy and action plan approaches gender as a crosscutting element in agrofor-
estry research and development and as a strategic research focus. It is aligned and contributes to the
CGIAR strategies for integration of gender in research, at the consortium level and at the level of the
different Consortium Research Programmes (CRPs) in which ICRAF participates. Integrating gender in
ICRAF’s research will pave the way for scientists to improve their understanding of gender and facilitate
the development of critical capacities to generate more and better quality research on gender and equi-
ty. This strategy and action plan systematically articulates key mechanisms and processes required to
improve gender in agroforestry research and development. It also lays out a roadmap and action points
to accomplish the objectives of the strategy.
Objectives of the gender strategy:
• Raise awareness and understanding of the importance of gender integration in agroforestry
research and development in ICRAF and among partners through relevant gender sensitiza-
tion and training;
• Enhance gender research capacity in ICRAF and among partners through provision of exper-
tise and robust tools;
• Mobilize adequate resources to support the goals of this strategy and drive ICRAF’s vision of
rural transformation in the developing world as smallholders increase their use of trees in agri-
cultural landscapes to improve food security, incomes, health and environmental sustainability;
• Generate a co-learning cycle between gender research and development practice and ensure
that gender dimensions are fully integrated in negotiation support for relevant agroforestry
landscapes.
iv
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
1
Contents
Executive summary ................................................................................................. iii
Glossary of relevant gender terms .........................................................................2
Introduction .............................................................................................................3
1. Objectives of the gender mainstreaming strategy and action plan .....................4
2. Gender in agroforestry research and development ............................................5
3. Integrating gender in ICRAF’s research and development ..................................8
4. Plan of Action to Implement the Gender Strategy .............................................11
4.1 Capacity development for gender-responsive agroforestry research
and development ......................................................................................11
4.2 Partnerships for gender-responsive research and development ..............12
4.3 Institutional support, organizational and accountability structure, and
resources required ...................................................................................12
5. Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the gender strategy: Key
activities, indicators and responsibilities ...........................................................14
Annexes ..................................................................................................................17
Annex I: Gender research elements and questions across ICRAF’s
Science Domains ...................................................................................................17
Annex II. Main functions of the Gender Unit ..........................................................19
References .............................................................................................................20
2
Glossary of relevant gender terms
Gender Refers to socially constructed roles, responsibilities, rights, power, needs
and constraints of men and women within a given society, including notions
and expectations of what is considered acceptable behaviour for men and
women. Gender roles are not necessarily determined by biology and can
therefore shift with time as a result of social, economic and technological
change. For example, the introduction of new tree species, management
practices, mounting pressures on land, climate change, increasing poverty or
migration can change the roles of men and women in agro-forestry.
Gender equality Refers to the equal enjoyment by women, girls, boys and men of rights,
opportunities, resources and rewards. A critical aspect of promoting gender
equality is the empowerment of women, with a focus on identifying and
redressing power imbalances.
Gender equity Is the process of being fair to women and men. To ensure fairness, strategies
and measures must often be available to compensate for women’s historical
and social disadvantages, which prevent women and men from otherwise
operating on a level playing eld. Equity leads to equality.
Gender analysis Refers to the employment of a tool or set of tools to analyze the different
roles that women and men perform and how these affect their experiences,
knowledge, skills and needs. It also includes analyzing gender relations and
identifying inequalities, thus helping to frame questions about gender roles
and relations in ways that improve targeting of interventions to address men’s
and women’s practical and strategic gender interests.
Gender-relevant
research
Research that does not have gender as primary object of study but where
social variables, including gender, are relevant in shaping outcomes in terms
of human wellbeing, environmental conservation, and equity. This type of
research should integrate gender considerations into all stages of the research
cycle.
Gender-specic
research
Research for which gender is a primary topic in the analysis. It investigates the
different priorities and needs of men and women. It also analyzes how gender
relations inuence men’s and women’s ability to manage and use agricultural
and forest products, their differential capacities to leverage natural resources
and other assets in pursuit of livelihood and productive opportunities, as
well as the impact of policies, external and internal stressors and process of
change on men and women.
Gender-
sensitive
research
Gender-relevant research that recognizes the potentially different priorities
and needs of men and women related to their gendered roles and interests
in managing and using agricultural and forest products, and takes them into
account in its design and implementation as well as in the dissemination of
its results.
Gender-
transformative
research
Research that involves critical awareness of gender roles and norms and
challenges the distribution of resources and allocation of duties between men
and women. Its purpose is to transform the underlying power relations and
structural barriers that lead to gender inequality and ultimately to poverty and
hunger.
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
3
Introduction
Gender is a relational principle that congures
women’s and men’s often unequal positions
at different levels of social organization, and
locates people of diverse identities differently
within societies and cultures, inuencing how
they are rewarded or recognized. A substantial
body of empirical evidence now shows that
high-impact and effective organizations are
solidly anchored on principles that value gender,
diversity and inclusion as fundamental precepts
of an enabling organizational culture.
ICRAF understands that to achieve signicant
impacts on development challenges, the
organization needs to rigorously address gender
equality and women’s empowerment issues
in agroforestry. To be able to do that, ICRAF
needs to dedicate efforts and resources not
only to integrate gender considerations and
transformative research on gender across its
programmes, but also to similarly address this
dynamic in its own workplace.
This strategy gives strategic guidance to the
integration of gender dimensions in the Centre’s
research and development programmes.
The generation of robust, gender-responsive
agroforestry knowledge is critical to the
formulation of policies and the establishment
of institutional arrangements that increase
gender equality in decision-making over the
management and control of agroforestry
resources. The document also includes an
action plan that outlines the organizational
structure, capacities and resources needed to
implement the strategy.
ICRAF’s Human Resources Unit is developing
a complementary strategy on gender and
workplace diversity. This companion document
will focus on innovative practices and
management systems that engender a diversity-
inclusive workplace. It will set out clear policy
guidelines to create and maintain such an
enabling organizational environment.
Women farmers in South East Sulawesi gather ripe pods and split them open. Photo©World Agroforestry Centre/
Yusuf Ahmad
4
1. Objectives of the gender mainstreaming strategy and action
plan
The goal of this strategy is to create an
institutional environment at ICRAF that supports
gender-sensitive and gender-transformative
research and development in agroforestry
landscapes as a critical contribution to achieving
ICRAF’s mission and vision.
The specic objectives are to:
• Raise gender awareness and
understanding of the importance of
gender integration in agroforestry
research and development in ICRAF and
among partners through relevant gender
sensitization and training;
• Enhance gender research capacity in
ICRAF and among partners through
provision of expertise and robust tools;
• Mobilize adequate resources to support
the goals of this strategy and drive
ICRAFs vision of rural transformation in
the developing world as smallholders
increase their use of trees in agricultural
landscapes to improve food security,
incomes, health and environmental
sustainability;
• Generate a co-learning cycle between
gender-relevant and gender-specic
research and development practice and
ensure that gender dimensions are fully
integrated in negotiation support for
relevant agroforestry landscapes.
In developing the strategy, the responsible
team conducted a critical review of gender
strategies of the CGIAR research programs
(CRPs) including the CGIAR Consortium gender
strategy, and the gender strategies of the
Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) CRP, the
Dryland Systems (DS) CRP, and the Climate
Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)
CRP1.
Following the development of a rst draft
of the strategy in January 2015, validation
workshops were held in Nairobi, Kenya and
Bogor, Indonesia in February and March 2015,
respectively. The purpose of the workshops
was to engage scientists and coordinators
from an early stage to gain consensus on a
comprehensive framework and roadmap for
integrating gender into ICRAF’s work. One of
the key messages from the workshops was that
there is a need for the organization to embrace
a culture that values gender in agroforestry
research, but there is also a sense of having
political will and a critical mass of scientists
engaged and empowered.
1 See: CGIAR Consortium level Gender
strategy http://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/
handle/10947/2630/Consortium_Gender_
Strategy.pdf?sequence=4
FTA gender strategy http://
foreststreesagroforestry.org/gender-
strategy-for-the-cgiar-research-program-
on-forests-trees-and-agroforestry-crp-fta/
DS gender strategy http://drylandsystems.
cgiar.org/sites/default/les/GenderStrategy.
pdf
CCAFS gender strategy https://ccafs.cgiar.
org/sites/default/les/assets/docs/ccafs_
gender_strategy2012-nal.pdf
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
5
2. Gender in agroforestry research and development
An FAO-SOFA study published in 2012
presented evidence that whilst women represent
43% of the agricultural workforce across all
developing countries, their access to resources
does not equal that of men. Women’s access
to land, water, nancial capital and knowledge
is limited in many countries. These constraints
on women’s productive capacity lower their
agricultural productivity and incomes and hinder
their effective management of natural resources
(FAO, 2012).
Several other seminal reports, including the
2010 Millennium Development Goal Summit
report, acknowledge that addressing the specic
constraints faced by the agricultural workforce
in developing countries can enhance agricultural
productivity and improve development
outcomes. Beyond rural women’s direct
agricultural labour contribution, they also play
critical roles in household food and nutrition
security (Hawkes and Ruel, 2011; Ahmed and
Sharma, 2004). Yet signicant gender disparities
in access to resources remain. These disparities
in large measure explain the consistent yield
gaps between men and women farmers that,
according to the FAO statistics, average around
20%-30% (FAO, 2010). Evidence demonstrates
that where gender equality is greater in terms
of both opportunities and benets, there is both
higher economic growth and a better quality of
life (IFAD, 2012).
Agroforestry has been increasingly recognized
as having a central role in sustainable
agriculture, generating robust knowledge on the
role trees play in production landscapes and the
multiple benets they deliver – from combating
climate change and contributing to food
production and household nutrition, to providing
sustainable fuel and timber (Dufo and Udry,
2004; Mbow et al., 2014). Women farmers are an
integral part of agroforestry systems, as they are
often responsible for managing trees, especially
at the early stages of establishment (Kiptot et
al., 2014). Women are often the majority of those
who cluster on marginal, degraded lands with
insecure tenure (Dufo and Udry, 2004; Agrawal,
2001), yet their roles in tree-based agricultural
production systems and the complex gender
relations that shape decision-making have
received minimal research attention.
Cocoa Farmers in South and Southeast Sulawesi. Photo©World Agroforestry Centre/Yusuf Ahmad
6
Why gender matters in agroforestry research and development
Decision-making over land use is gendered, as are perceptions about environmental and
ecosystem services. Both aspects have strong implications for understanding landscape
multi-functionality. Gender behaviour in relation to sources of information that is trusted
and perceptions of risk in the evaluation of new technologies is key to better understanding
how landscapes change (Villamor et al., 2014). In Indonesia, for example, empirical studies
suggest that women are more active and dynamic than men in responding to external
opportunities that often shape landscape use (Villamor et al., 2013).
Gender differences are crucial to understanding the motivations to incorporate trees on
farms. In Africa, male motivation is largely conditioned by nancial factors, whereas females
are concerned with soil conservation and household food consumption (Kiptot and Franzel,
2012; Fischer et al., 2012; Peterman et al., 2010).
Rural women in African countries have traditionally been the primary domesticators of
forest-based food and medicinal plants; they have highly specialized knowledge on trees
and forests, species diversity, management, use and conservation practices. Yet their
participation in tree domestication is often hindered by their limited access to and control
over land and trees, lack of information, and heavy household workloads (Degrande and
Arinloye, 2015).
Rural women make substantial contributions to labour in agroforestry systems; they often
disproportionately bear the costs of tree management, but realize only a fraction of the
benets, and tend to be enlisted for decision-making only when tree resources are degraded
(Rocheleau and Slayter, 2007; Teklehaimanot, 2004).
The use of fodder shrubs for increased milk production, an agroforestry practice promoted in
East Africa, showed that 47% of planters were women (Kiptot et al., 2013), while in Tanzania
and Uganda, only 39.8% of the income from milk was managed and controlled by women.
Yet fodder shrubs provide direct benets to women farmers including fuelwood, high-quality
manure and stakes for vegetable production (Degrande et al., 2007).
Gender is an important determinant of participation in the value chains of timber and
non-timber products; cultural, economic, governance, political and environmental factors
intersect with other social factors such as education, age and ethnicity to shape the
experience of women. Unfortunately, most timber and non-timber products value chain
interventions have focused on women, rather than on the relations between women and
men, thus implicating prospects for gender-equitable and sustainable outcomes (Haverhals
et al., 2014).
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
7
The international community has committed to
a new set of Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) that will determine the new common
international development imperatives, and
countries are now expected to strengthen
efforts to achieve the goals. One of the 17 SDGs
is achieving gender equality – a goal of huge
magnitude that positions gender research in
development as a key endeavour and a priority
investment for donors. The CGIAR has also
aligned its recently approved Strategic Results
Framework (SRF) with the SDGs and has set
ambitious sex-disaggregated targets, including,
50 million women assisted to exit poverty and
75 million women meeting minimum dietary
energy requirements.” Gender and youth have
been recognized as crosscutting themes in the
SRF, and gender and inclusive growth is one
of the eight global research priorities that the
CGIAR wants to develop the requisite capacities
to develop outcomes with partners.
To achieve signicant impacts on development
challenges, ICRAF’s research needs to
rigorously address gender equality and women’s
empowerment issues in agriculture and natural
resource management. To do that, the Centre
must dedicate efforts and resources to integrate
gender considerations across its research
programmes to enable the production of
gender-responsive knowledge and innovations.
Research that does not recognize the inherent
differences that exist between men and women
– and the inequalities that are often complexly
intertwined with clan, ethnicity, and other
modes of social differentiation – run the risk of
being irrelevant. Such research can even create
unintended consequences that are adverse to
poor women smallholders and their households.
Wheat harvesting in Rajasthan, India. Photo@World Agroforestry Centre/Charlie Pye Smith
8
3. Integrating gender in ICRAF’s research and development
To achieve its vision, ICRAF combines six strategic roles that mobilize its research and development
agenda. These roles also make up a generic Theory of Change of how ICRAF expects science and
evidence-based knowledge in the form of research outputs to translate into locally articulated change
in the form of development outcomes.
Analysing this generic Theory of Change and its associated roles with a gender lens offers a general
framework for gender mainstreaming in the overall research agenda; it also helps demonstrate the
relevance of gender analysis and how it informs the achievement of ICRAF’s vision and goals. Table 1
provides an overview of what integrating gender in each of ICRAF’s six roles would require.
There are measures address gender issues in Burkina Faso. Photo@World Agroforestry Centre
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
9
Table 1. Gender dimensions across ICRAF’s roles in research and development
Role 1: Generation and validation
of knowledge as International
Public Goods (IPGs).
ICRAF’s research agenda should include gender strategic
issues that go beyond a focus on women and their access
to resources, to analysing institutions, power relations and
gender inequality at household, community and institutional
levels.
Research should focus on adequate gender and social
stratication, a eld research design that addresses potential
gender concerns, and the creation of co-learning mechanisms
with research participants moving away from pure extractive
data collection.
Role 2: Building robust evidence
for higher-level decisions on
policies and investments.
Research should focus on the nexus of gender and socio-
cultural factors of differentiation and their historical contexts
in agroforestry landscapes at nested scales.
Role 3: Working with partners at
multiple scales to translate IPGs
into actionable knowledge.
Research should focus on gender differences in technology
adaptation; apply a gender lens to the assessment of
approaches and materials at multiple scales; and implement
iterative learning approaches with partners aiming at gender
transformation
Role 4: Demonstrating proof
of application of knowledge to
accelerate impact and advance the
science of scaling up
ICRAF should engage with partners, including relevant
stakeholders with an interest in, and responsibility for, gender
equity policies and programming; ensure research offers
opportunities for co-learning by men and women stakeholders
at all levels.
Design scalable options that simultaneously increase
productivity, sustainability and gender equality
Role 5: Developing and mobilizing
capacity at institutional and
individual levels.
ICRAF should promote gender-sensitive agroforestry
innovations (social and technological) that are proven and
tested at regional, community, household and individual levels
among men, women and youth.
Research should mobilize efforts to improve gender
awareness and capacity of agroforestry boundary partner
institutions.
Role 6: Convening, advocacy and
interfacing amongst a wide range
of partners to be co-responsible for
development outcomes and better
engaged with realities faced by
development agencies.
ICRAF should engage partners and stakeholders to promote
the adoption of national and international agroforestry,
agriculture and/or NRM policies that include specic and
appropriate provisions that dismantle structural barriers to
rural women’s empowerment and gender equality.
Research should focus on (i) increasing equitable participation
by women farmers and other disadvantaged groups in
household and community decision-making and asset/
benet management; and (ii) improving women’s and other
disadvantaged groups’ access to agroforestry input and
output markets.
10
To operationalize its strategic goals and roles the
World Agroforestry Centre’s R&D is organized
around six Science Domains (SDs). Collectively,
the SDs’ research agenda addresses the role of
trees in transforming lives and landscapes.
The SD teams are primarily focused on the rst
two of ICRAF’s roles: generating knowledge
as IPGs and building evidence to inform high-
level decisions. They also support regional
and country teams with roles three, actionable
knowledge, and ve, capacity development.
Integrating gender analysis and research in the
SDs’ agenda will enable them to provide socially
differentiated solutions to complex problems
across different agro-ecologies, sectors and
political spheres.
In developing this strategy document, Science
Domain teams were invited to reect and
discuss the gender dimensions of their work.
Each of them proposed a set of strategic gender
research questions presented in Annex I, as
an overall guidance to harmonize and build a
coherent gender research agenda.
Following the requirements of gender integration
in role one, research questions related to SD2,
for example, should go beyond the identication
of potential and actual market actors (men and
women in specic locations) to careful analysis
of underlying structural factors mitigating
women’s effective participation in tree-food
product value chains. Science-based knowledge
from such analysis is critical to guiding and
informing roles three and ve – supporting
effective interventions to improve women
farmers’ participation in agroforestry tree-
product markets and increasing and diversifying
their incomes.
Gender strategic research under SD1 and SD5
are cut across by issues of insecure land and
tree tenure, which is more evident for women in
developing countries. Research should focus on
identifying tenure arrangements that promote
secure gender-equitable and socially inclusive
access to, and benets from land and tress.
Efforts under SD1, SD3 and SD4 that relate to
technology design and agroforestry innovations
should pay special attention to understanding
the gender division of resources and knowledge
at household and community levels in order to
develop strategic, user-focused interventions
that would more effectively contribute to
increased adoption at different landscape
levels. Studies have shown, for example, that
in circumstances where men risk losing control
over women’s labour, produce or income,
men may resist women’s efforts to innovate
(Blackden and Wodon, 2006; Tsikata, 2003;
Action Aid and CARE, 2012).
As ICRAF’s research is largely implemented
through regional and national teams and
partners, these teams would also address
gender dimensions related to implementation,
promotion and scaling up of tested technologies
and context-specic solutions. Following the
requirements for role six, priority should be
given to research and development programmes
that increase equitable participation in
household and community decision-making
and asset/benet management, and improve
access and participation by women and other
disadvantaged groups in agroforestry input
and output markets. These programmes would
then focus on different topics according to the
regional or national priorities and contexts.
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
11
4. Plan of Action to Implement the Gender Strategy
The general framework for gender integration
presented in section 3 of this strategy discusses
the integration of gender considerations in
relevant research as well as the production of
strategic gender knowledge and innovations.
Both require dedicated efforts and resources.
Gender integration requires planning of research
projects using a gender lens and should happen
at every stage of the R&D cycle. Central to this
process are issues of introspection, mindset
change, and skills development among
researchers.
The key to gender-sensitive agroforestry
research and development lies in developing
the awareness and capacities of researchers to
understand and address the gender dimensions
of their research. How, for example, intra-
household dynamics of decision-making over
production and management can affect and
be affected by research and development
interventions.
Gender integration should start at the problem
identication and analysis stage by developing
partnerships that will allow the articulation of
research priorities and goals aligned with the
interest of women and men beneciaries, local
organizations, and other relevant stakeholders
with responsibility for supporting gender-
equitable policies and programming.
The need to develop capacities and establish
partnerships is relevant to all science domains
and regional teams. Thus the successful
implementation of this strategy requires the
active engagement and contribution from
staff at all levels and an enabling institutional
environment that provides support in terms
of human and organizational resources and
operational tools.
The Plan of Action presented below identies
the efforts needed at different organizational
levels to foster such an enabling environment
structured around three priority areas, each with
guidelines and proposed actions:
i. Capacity development for gender-
responsive agroforestry research and
development;
ii. Partnerships for gender-responsive
research and development;
iii. Institutional support, organizational and
accountability structure, and resources
required;
4.1 Capacity development for gen-
der-responsive agroforestry re-
search and development
It is critical that the Centre devote efforts to
improve scientists’ awareness of the importance
of addressing gender dimensions in research
and its effect on development outcomes. The
Centre must also increase its institutional
capacity for gender analysis and gender-specic
research.
The Centre will address capacity gaps in
integrating gender through the following steps:
1. Continuous and systematic awareness-rais-
ing of scientists and technical staff to build
a common understanding of gender-relat-
ed concepts in agroforestry, agriculture and
natural resources management and to equip
them with the basic skills and tools to plan
for, collect, analyze, and evaluate gender-dis-
aggregated data.
2. Develop capacities of interested scientists
and gender focal points for gender analysis
and transformative gender research. Specic
actions will include: (i) seminars with partners
and external gender experts to share new
tools, insights and approaches to gender
integration and analysis; (ii) sponsorship of
Centre scientists, through fellowship oppor-
tunities and the staff development fund, to
participate in gender-related courses; and (iii)
setting up and promoting electronic knowl-
edge-sharing platforms, including a section
of the Centre’s website dedicated to sharing
gender and agroforestry publications, re-
sources, and tools.
12
3. Instituting a mentoring programme that pairs
up experienced gender/social scientists with
researchers across the Centre.
4. Self-assessments and reviews among
scientists, technical staff and partners will
be encouraged to capture emerging gaps
and opportunities to improve understanding
of gender-related concepts and gender-
disaggregated data.
4.2 Partnerships for gender-
responsive research and
development
Effective attention to gender will require
partnering with a wide range of institutions,
including other CGIAR centres through
CRPs; national, regional and international
agricultural research partners; as well as with
non-research partners. Moreover, achieving
gender-responsive outcomes and closing
the gender gap at different societal levels
will depend on how effective ICRAF will be in
forging strategic partnerships with advocacy
and policy-inuencing communities that have
the comparative advantage to develop local
capacities, build awareness and mobilize local
action for gender-responsive change at all
levels. Policy and advocacy partnerships with
women’s networks, civil society organizations
and women’s groups are fundamental to
creating environments that enable the promotion
of technologies and knowledge products that
benet women at all landscape levels.
The strategy for partnerships will focus on
targeting organizations with gender expertise
and working on gender-transformative initiatives,
and becoming a valuable partner for such
organizations in agroforestry research and
development.
Scientists will be encouraged to forge strategic
collaborations with established gender
research institutions such as the International
Centre for Research on Women (ICRW) and
the International Development and Research
Centre (IDRC). It would be equally strategic to
forge partnerships with any of the large number
of university research programmes on gender
in agriculture at the national and international
levels. Such research partnerships will increase
the gender responsiveness of problem
identication, priority setting, project design,
and methodology and tools development. This
will in turn position ICRAF as a partner of choice
for boundary partners with an interest in and
responsibility for supporting gender-equitable
policies and programming.
The second and equally critical focus is
partnerships for technology delivery, adoption
and capacity development among men and
women farmers at different landscape levels.
This focus prioritizes the forging of collaborative
arrangements with governmental and non-
governmental development organizations
(national and international) engaged in the
development of gender-sensitive extension
systems.
ICRAF will also prioritize inclusive
partnerships with local institutions, including
local governments and community-based
organization, to amplify the cultural t of
technologies and innovations to the local
context.
Lastly, ICRAF will identify opportunities and
gaps with long-term partners to increase their
awareness of the importance of gender research
and the integration of gender dimensions in
their work. Taken together, these partnerships
will crucially amplify capacities to address
gender integration across agroforestry research,
technology delivery, and policy impacts at
different scales.
4.3 Institutional support,
organizational and accountability
structure, and resources required
The relevance of gender as an analysis
criterion and a determining factor in achieving
development outcomes should be reected
in institutional values, support systems, and
resource mobilization. The commitment and
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
13
engagement of the highest management level
is crucial, as is also the establishment of an
organizational platform that raises the prole of
gender research and spearheads the integration
of gender considerations in research as well as
the production and dissemination of evidence-
based knowledge on the dynamics of gender
relations and agroforestry.
Specic actions to be taken for establishing
such an organizational platform include:
1. Management and senior leadership
commitment that will be manifested through
i. Re-articulating ICRAF’s institutional
values in the corporate strategy to
ensure that gender elements are
properly reected, and communicate
these widely to staff and partners;
ii. Providing the necessary support and
resources to successfully implement
the strategy, including the deployment
of resources to establish the Gender
Unit and support the successful
implementation of the strategy;
iii. Nominating a champion within the SLT
and the Board of Trustees who will
help mobilize the institutional changes
needed to implement the strategy.
2. Establish a functional Gender Unit and a
senior gender scientist/advisor position to
lead and support gender-responsive re-
search and development at ICRAF in both
bilateral projects and in participating CGIAR
Research Programmes (CRPs). The scientist
will have a solid track record in gender and
agroforestry/agriculture and, as the focal
point for gender at ICRAF, will play a lead-
ership role in centrally positioning gender
research in the science community. A key re-
sponsibility of this position will be to develop
a robust resource mobilization portfolio and
leverage funds to support strategic gender
research in the organization. See Annex II for
a complete list of functions and responsibili-
ties of the Gender Unit.
3. Support and strengthen the Gender Imple-
mentation Team,2 which will work closely
with the Gender Unit to support gender inte-
gration and work jointly in the development
of gender research proposals.
4. Endorse the recommendation for cascading
responsibility/accountability to all scientic
and technical staff for gender mainstreaming
in agroforestry research and development
by:
i. Incorporating indicators of gender
responsiveness in performance
contracts and annual evaluations for
science leaders, regional and country
coordinators;
ii. Including minimum standards of gender
integration, where appropriate, as one
of the criteria of a quality proposal, and
integrate it in the proposal approval
process;
iii. Requiring researchers and other
professional staff to always share
research results and outputs with
advocates, policy makers and men and
women from different socio-economic
backgrounds who participated in the
research or who could be affected by
the research ndings;
iv. Encouraging researchers and other
professional staff to follow the
standards for gender integration in the
R&D cycle proposed in this document
and other tools and materials for
gender integration promoted by the
Gender Unit.
2 A group of gender focal points at various
Science Domains, Regional and Country
ofces that has consolidated in the last three
years. The GIT focal points have not only
become advocates of gender integration in
their own regions and units but have also
developed an important network to promote
and move forward strategic research on
gender and agroforestry.
14
5. Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the gender
strategy: Key activities, indicators and responsibilities
The implementation of this strategy will be systematically monitored to guide efforts on resource
mobilization, the activities of the Gender Unit and the decision-making process at the higher levels of
management. Systematic monitoring will also foster learning and facilitate continuous improvement
at every stage of the implementation process.
The framework proposed is based on the strategy objectives and the three priority areas dened
in the action plan. Each is proposed as an action area with corresponding activities, indicators and
timeframes.
Strategy
Objective
Action Area Activities Indicators Responsibility
Enhance gender
research capacity
throughout ICRAF
and its partners
Capacity
development
for gender-
responsive
agroforestry
research and
development;
Continuous
and systematic
awareness-
raising on gender
integration and
gender research
% of scientists
and professional
staff that has
been exposed to
gender-awareness
and training
opportunities
Lead: Gender
Unit supported
by: SLT, SD
leaders,
research leaders
% of gender-
sensitive research
projects
Develop internal
capacities for
gender analysis
and transformative
gender research
% of researchers
with knowledge
and skills to apply
gender analysis
% of potentially
gender-
transformative
research projects
Establishing
a mentoring
programme to
build capacities on
gender
% of scientists
directly involved in
gender research
Long way to go- Vietnamese women farmers in rice elds Photo©World Agroforestry Centre/
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
15
Mobilize
adequate
resources to
support gender
research to
contribute to
ICRAF’s vision
Institutional
support,
organizational
structure, and
resources
required for
supporting
gender
integration in
ICRAF’s work
Establish a senior
gender scientist
position to lead
and support gender
mainstreaming at
ICRAF
Gender unit is
established and
fully functional
Senior
Leadership
Increase
accountability
of professional
staff and research
leaders for gender-
responsive research
and development
Gender integration
indicators
incorporated into
annual performance
contracts and
evaluations
Identify priority areas
for gender research
and develop
relevant proposals
on gender-
transformative
research
% of gender-
specic research
products
(briefs, scientic
papers, policy
recommendations)
Identify priority areas
for gender research
and develop
relevant proposals
on gender-
transformative
research
% of potentially
gender
transformative
research projects
Gender Unit
supported by
gender focal
points
Develop a proposal
review process and
guide/checklist for
incorporating gender
elements
PDU checklist
incorporates
gender guidelines
Gender Unit
Generate a co-
learning cycle
between gender
research and
development
practice
and ensure
that gender
dimensions are
fully integrated
in negotiation
support for
relevant
agroforestry
landscapes
Strengthening
partnerships
for gender
sensitive and
transformative
research
Increase the number
of strategic partners
working on gender
Number of MoUs
and collaborative
agreements with
strategic partners
working on gender
increased
Gender Unit,
PDU
Increase the number
of rural women’s
networks, NGOs or
CBO’s working on
women issues
Number of MoUs
and cooperative
with women’s
networks/NGOs/
CBOs increased
Gender Unit and
research leaders
Develop information-
sharing platform
for knowledge
sharing and learning
about gender
transformation in
agroforestry
Information sharing
platform/portal
established
Gender Unit
16
H’mong woman with her child picking indigenous Shan tea leaves. Photo©World Agroforestry Centre
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
17
Annexes
Annex I: Gender research elements and questions across ICRAF’s Science
Domains
ICRAF Science Domain Gender Research Questions
SD1 - Agroforestry Systems
Research into the appropriate agroforestry-
management options and their economic
and ecological impacts on farming systems
and household welfare
• What processes (research/actions/reforms)
can lead simultaneously to greater productivity,
sustainability and gender equality in different
contexts?
• What are the synergies and trade-offs between
productivity, sustainability and gender equality in
different contexts and at different scales (farm,
household, community, landscape)?
• How do we design scalable options that
simultaneously increase productivity, sustainability
and gender equality? Can we identify best-bet
approaches, methods, tools and indicators for
different contexts and scales?
SD2 - Tree Products and Markets
Enhancing the potential to achieve rural
development goals through tree-products
value chains and services
• Identify and analyze power relations between
women and men; How do they determine access
to productive resources, shape decisions and
distribute benets within the household?
• Identify and analyze constraints (time, social,
budget, legal) that inhibit women’s participation
in value chains and markets for agroforestry
products.
• Identify the aspirations of women to participate in
these value chains.
SD3 -Tree Diversity, Domestication and
Delivery
Identifying, delivering and conserving
quality tree germplasm as well as
supporting the optimal use of the right tree
in the right place for the right purpose.
• How do gender roles, priorities and knowledge
inuence the access, use and conservation of tree
genetic resources?
• How can gender-specic knowledge and roles
inuence tree species selection and prioritization?
• What are the implications of gender-specic
knowledge and roles for propagation and access
to markets for recently domesticated trees?
• How can the different priorities of men, women
and youth be considered to improve the efciency
of delivery systems and ensure that protable
material choices are available to smallholder
farming landscapes?
18
SD4 - Land Health
Develop and promote scientically rigorous
methods for measuring
and monitoring land health, assessing land
health risks, and targeting and evaluating
agroforestry and other sustainable land
management interventions to improve
soil fertility, ecosystem health and human
wellbeing
• How do environmental and behavioural risk
factors that inuence land degradation interact
with gender dynamics?
• Identify the gender dynamics that may affect the
cost efciencies of agroforestry and alternative
preventative and rehabilitation interventions under
different circumstances.
SD5 - Environmental Services
Understand and promote the benets and
sustenance of key environmental services
associated with tree-based
landscapes, including water, soil
stabilization, carbon, and biodiversity
• What approaches, including timing, sequencing
and overall design of negotiation processes
for payments for environmental services (PES)
and co-investment schemes, are necessary
for ensuring gender-equitable and effective
participation?
• How effectively can gender perceptions,
preferences and sensitivity be integrated into the
decision-making processes and practice portfolios
that help to achieve climate-smart landscapes?
• How can gender inuence the structure and
dynamics of landscapes to reduce conicts of
interest among actors and enhance functionality?
SD6 - Climate Change
Examine how poor farmers and national/
sub-national agencies can better adapt to
changing conditions as well as benet from
mitigation opportunities.
Understand and monitor how trees and
agroforestry systems are responding to
current climate variability.
• Which climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices
are gender-responsive? Which are the most
gender transformative?
• Which gender-responsive CSA practices and
investments have the largest returns (and for
whom)?
• Will international climate policy instruments
exacerbate or mitigate inequities between
different actors at multiple scales? And how can
they be used to promote the latter?
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
19
Annex II. Main functions of the Gender Unit
• Provide scientic, conceptual and
methodological leadership for gender in
agroforestry research and development
across the Centre’s participating CRPs
and bilateral projects to contribute to the
achievement of ICRAF’s strategic goals;
support the implementation of diversity-
responsive policies that explicitly state a
strong organizational commitment to gender,
diversity and inclusion.
• Lead the operationalization of ICRAF’s
gender strategy and action plan for
agroforestry/landscape research and
development; monitor and support ICRAF’s
Units, regional and national programmes
in using gender-sensitive criteria to
assess contributions to gender equality in
agroforestry landscapes.
• Build robust national, regional and
international partnerships for gender-
specic research and development to drive
agroforestry innovations to impacts at scale.
• Lead Centre-wide resource mobilization
efforts for strategic research on gender in
agroforestry;
• Raise gender awareness and lead capacity
development of scientists and partners to
better integrate gender in research projects
and programmes; coordinate and support
capacity development of gender focal points
across ICRAF’s Science Domains and
regions.
• Lead the development of tools and
methodologies for gender integration in
research and development;
• Support the development of communication
and media resources on gender and
agroforestry to facilitate learning and sharing
of knowledge among center scientists and
partners.
A proud Kenyan woman farmer with her papaya orchard. Photo©World Agroforestry Centre/
20
References
Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property
institutions and sustainable governance of
resources. World Development, 29, 1649–1672.
Ahmed, A. U. and M. Sharma. 2004. Food-for-
Education Programs with Locally Produced
Food: Effects on Farmers and Consumers in
Sub-Saharan Africa. Prepared for the Millennium
Project Task Force on Hunger. Washington, DC:
International Food Policy Research Institute.
Baden, S. 1998. Gender issues in agricultural
liberalization. Topic paper prepared for
Directorate General for Development (DGVIII)
of the European Commission. Bridge
(Development-Gender) Report, Number
41. Brighton, United Kingdom: Institute of
Development Studies. Available online at http://
www.ids.ac.uk/bridge/Reports/re41c.pdf.
Blackden, M. and Wodon, Q. 2006. Gender, time
use, and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. World
Bank Working Paper No.73. Washington, DC:
World Bank.
Degrande, A and Arinloye, D. 2015. Gender in
Agroforestry: implications for Action-Research.
Nature & Faune Journal, Volume 29, Issue 1:
6-11.
Degrande, A., Essomba, H., Bikoue Mekongo,
C., Kamga, A. 2007. Domestication, genre et
vulnerabilité. Participation des femmes, des
jeunes et des catégories les plus pauvres a
la domestication des arbres agroforestiers
au Cameroun. ICRAF Working Paper No.48.
Yaounde.
Doss, C. and Morris, M. (2001). How does
gender affect the adoption of agricultural
innovations? The case of improved maize
technology in Ghana. Agricultural Economics,
25(1), 27–39.
Drafor Amenyah I. and Korbla P. Puplampu.
2013. Women in agriculture: An assessment
of the current state of affairs in Africa. ACBF
Working Paper No. 24
Duo and C. Udry. 2004. Intrahousehold
Resource Allocation in Côte d’Ivoire: Social
Norms, Separate Accounts and Consumption
Choices. Working Paper 10498. Cambridge, MA,
US: National Bureau of Economic Research.
FAO, 2012. The state of food and agriculture:
Investing in agriculture for a better future. FAO.
FAO, 2010-2011. The State of Food and
Agriculture: Women in Agriculture. FAO.
Fischer, E. and Qaim, M. 2012. Gender,
agricultural commercialization, and collective
action in Kenya. Food Security, 4, pp.1-13
Haverhals, M., Ingram V., Elias, M., Basnett, B.
Gender and forest, tree and agroforestry value
chains. Evidence from Literature. Brief from the
CGIAR Research Programm on Forest Tress and
Agroforestry. http://www.bioversityinternational.
org/leadmin/user_upload/research/research_
portfolio/Forest_and_tree_diversity/Brief_
Gender_FTA_value_chains.pdf
Hawkes C and Ruel M. 2011. Value chains
for nutrition. 2020 Conference: Leveraging
Agriculture for Improving Nutrition and Health.
2020 Conference Paper 4. Washington, DC:
International Food Policy Research Institute.
IFAD. 2012. Gender equality and women’s
empowerment policy.
Kiptot, E., Franzel, S. and Degrande, A. 2014.
Gender, agroforestry and food security in Africa.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,
6, pp. 104-109.
Kiptot, E. and Franzel, S. 2013. Gender and
agroforestry in Africa: are women participating?
Occasional Paper Series. World Agroforestry
Center.
Kiptot, E. and Franzel, S. 2012. Gender and
agroforestry in Africa: who benets? The African
perspective. In Agroforestry — The Future of
Global Land Use. Edited by Nair PKR, Garrity D.
Dordrecht: Springer; 2012:463-497.
Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L.,
Bustamante, M., 2014. Achieving mitigation
and adaptation to climate change through
sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
6, 8-14.
Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Berhman, J.,
& Nkonya, E. (2010). Understanding gender
differences in agricultural productivity in
Uganda and Nigeria. IFPRI Discussion Paper.
Washington, DC: International Food Policy
Research Institute.
Righi, E., Dogliotti, S., Stefanini, FM., Pacini,
GC. 2011. Capturing farm diversity at regional
level to up-scale farm level impact assessment
of sustainable development options. Agriculture,
Ecosystems Environment 2011, 142:63-74.
Teklehaimanot, Z. 2004. Exploiting the potential
of indigenous agroforestry trees: Parkia
biglobosa and Vitellaria parodoxa in sub-
Saharan Africa. Agroforestry Systems 61: 207-
220.
Tsikata, D. 2003. Securing women’s interests
within land tenure reforms: Recent debates in
Tanzania’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1–
2):149–83.
Gender Strategy and Action Plan
21
Villamor, G., van Noordwijk, M., Djanibekov, U.,
Chiong-Javier, M.E., Catacutan, D. 2014. Gender
differences in land-use decisions: shaping
multifunctional landscapes? Current Opinion in
Environmental Sustainability, 6, 128-133.
Villamor, G., Desrianti, F., Akiefnawati, R.,
Amaruzaman, S., van Noordwijk, M. 2013.
Gender inuences decisions to change land use
practices in the tropical forest margins of Jambi,
Indonesia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies
for Global Change 2013:1-23
A hard day labour for a Kenyan woman winnowing cheek peas grown at her farm. Photo©World Agroforestry
Centre/
22
Farmers examine crop in Nyandarua, Kenya Photo©World Agroforestry Centre/Sherry Odeyo
World Agroforestry Centre is a
member of the CGIAR Consortium
World Agroforestry Centre, United Nations Avenue, Gigiri,
P. O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Phone + (254) 20 722 4000, Fax + (254) 20 722 4001,
Via USA phone (1-650) 833-6645,
Via USA fax (1-650) 833-6646,
Email: worldagroforestry@cgiar.org
Website: www.worldagroforestry.org
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
What is the role of gender in the harvesting, processing and sale of forest and tree products?
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter examines women’s participation in agroforestry relative to men and the challenges and successes they experience. Women’s participation is hampered by socioeconomic, cultural, and policy issues that vary within and across locations. The degree of women’s involvement relative to men in practices such as soil fertility management and fodder production is fairly high in terms of proportion of female-headed households participating but is low as measured by the area they allocate to these activities and the number of trees they plant. The lesser involvement reflects women’s lack of resources, particularly labor, their heavy workload, and perhaps their greater aversion to risk. Women dominate the production and processing of indigenous fruits; however, they are confined to the lower end of the value chain (retailing), which limits their control over and returns from the production process. The recommendations arising from the review include (1) facilitating women to form and strengthen associations, (2) targeting women’s associations, (3) helping women to improve productivity and marketing of products considered to be in women’s domain, and (4) improving women’s access to information.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The critical link between gender and forest and tree-based livelihoods is gaining recognition. A growing body of research has highlighted the role of gender in shaping access to, management of and use of forest, agroforestry and tree (FTA) resources and markets and their associated benefits. Myriad development and trade interventions have affected how men and women participate and interact in value chains as products travel from trees and forests to consumers in local and global markets. There is an increasing realisation that interventions can be further optimized to alleviate poverty, ensure social inclusion and gender equity, enhance food security, nutrition and health, and promote the sustainable management of FTA resources. This section presents a systematic review of 126 studies with the aim of showing 1) the nature of gender differences in FTA value chains; 2) where these differences are concentrated within these value chains; 3) the factors that explain these differences; and 4) the extent to which these differences influence the value chain's prospects for generating gender-equitable and sustainable outcomes. Using examples of interventions from cocoa and shea chains, the impacts of interventions in these chains are assessed, particularly where they have resulted in gendered outcomes. Lessons for improving equity and the impacts of chain interventions include focusing on improving participation levels and the benefits derived by both women and men, and to take more account of their relations. Raising social awareness, the use of role models and pilots to stimulate social change, and implementing technological improvements need to be implemented concurrently, in parallel stages of the chain, to achieve structural improvements in gendered participation and benefits. Expectations by policy makers, practioners and the research community of the long timescales required to effect real changes, for example in customs and tenure changes, need to be realistic.
Article
Full-text available
Women in sub-Saharan Africa are major contributors to the agricultural economy, but their lower access than men to productive resources and opportunities, limits them from achieving optimal production. This paper gives a snapshot of issues surrounding women’s participation in and benefits from agroforestry, challenges that women face and examples of opportunities to enhance their involvement. First and foremost, we acknowledge that women’s decision making and management power related to production systems is complex and highly context-specific. Despite their active involvement in diverse agroforestry practices (e.g. management of nitrogen-fixing and fodder trees, domestication of indigenous fruit trees), their level of participation and benefits are often constrained by cultural norms and limited resources. Agroforestry value chains are particularly important for women’s income, but again low access to capital, technology and information, constrains women from developing their enterprises further. Moreover, women’s roles in value chains are often poorly supported by policymakers (in the design as well as in the implementation of policies) and service providers. Interventions to help smallholders improve the marketing of tree and agricultural products have not always had positive effects on women, because when the business becomes more profitable, men often tend to take over. One of the major challenges for agricultural development, however, remains women’s low access to extension services. Profound reforms in African extension systems from a centrally-controlled, top-down approach to a more participatory and pluralistic system, are expected to improve women’s access to agricultural information and services. The paper ends with some recommendations in the field of technology, policy and institutions, to enhance women’s participation in and benefits from agroforestry, and agriculture in general.
Article
Full-text available
Executive summary Background This paper presents the findings of a review undertaken on gender and the adoption of agroforestry in Africa. The concept of gender as used in this paper is not about women, but rather as an organizing principle in society, which is used as a process and practice of taking into account the differences between men and women in the course of designing and implementing development projects. The aim is to come up with strategies that challenge gender imbalances, thus ensuring that both men and women are able to make decisions, access resources equitably, hold positions and benefit from development initiatives such as agroforestry. Particular emphasis in this paper is given to women who despite farming remain disadvantaged in the agricultural sector due to cultural, socioeconomic and sociological factors. Such factors include ownership and access to resources, land tenure systems, access to education and extension services, among many others. The synthesis presented in this paper puts particular emphasis on women’s involvement, highlighting their motivation, the benefits they receive and the challenges and successes experienced relative to men. The review examined 104 studies of gender and agroforestry. The coverage of our review is mainly Anglophone Africa and articles in English on Francophone Africa. The review was guided by seven research questions: • What is the proportion of women participating in agroforestry? • Are women able to manage agroforestry practices, that is, carry out the needed operations? • What are women’s preferences in relation to tree attributes? • Do women benefit from agroforestry and how? • Do women have access to agroforestry information? • Are women involved in agroforestry product markets? • How do we promote efficient participation of women in agroforestry with greater benefits accruing to them? Agroforestry practices Agroforestry practices examined include fodder shrubs, “fertilizer trees” for soil improvement, fruit and vegetable production and processing and woodlots. Fodder and soil fertility improvement technologies, based on indigenous practices, were introduced in the last two decades, mainly in East and Southern Africa. Fodder shrubs are protein-rich legumes that are grown along boundaries and pathways or in lines to form terraces, thus reducing erosion and providing firewood. They mature in 9-12 months and can be cut periodically and fed to cows and goats. Three of the most promising “fertilizer tree” options are improved tree fallows (the planting of fast growing leguminous trees or shrubs in rotation with crops), biomass transfer (cutting and incorporating leaf biomass from trees and shrubs as green manure) and mixed intercropping (planting nitrogen-fixing trees that can tolerate heavy pruning in a regular pattern with crops). By providing nutrients to crops, these practices can potentially help farmers improve their soils and incomes, thereby improving food security. In contrast, woodlots and fruit and vegetable production and processing practices examined are mainly indigenous practices. Fruits and vegetables are consumed fresh or in processed form and are sometimes sold. Woodlots are generally used to produce timber, poles, and fuelwood for both home consumption and sale. The assessment of fruits and vegetables include examples from throughout sub-Saharan Africa while woodlot case studies are from East and Southern Africa. Little or no information concerning gender was available for other agroforestry practices and products such as medicine, gums and resins or exotic fruits. Gender and agroforestry in Africa: Are women participating? ix Key findings What is the proportion of women participating in agroforestry? Women’s participation is very high in enterprises that are considered to be women’s domain, such as indigenous fruit and vegetable products and processing. Indigenous fruits and vegetables are attractive to women because they involve minimal inputs in the form of labour, which women can provide. In the Vitelleria paradoxa (shea) growing region of Benin, 90% of women are involved in collecting nuts/fruits of the shea tree while in Cameroon, women and children are also the main collectors of the leaves of Gnetum africanum which is used as a vegetable. In Zambia and western Kenya, no significant differences were found between proportions of men and women practising improved fallows. However, there were more women than men using improved fallows and biomass transfer in western Kenya and using fodder shrubs in central Kenya. The findings also show that although women are as actively involved in agroforestry for fodder production, woodlot technology and soil fertility improvement as their male counterparts, their level of participation is low as reflected in the number of shrubs/trees they plant relative to men. Female heads of households planted only half as many shrubs/trees as men, reflecting the fact that their farms were half as large. The lesser involvement reflects women’s lack of resources, particularly land and labour, their heavy workload and perhaps also their greater aversion to risk. Are women able to manage agroforestry technologies? Women are frequently responsible for managing trees and as with other agricultural enterprises they do most of the work especially during the initial stages of establishment i.e. planting, weeding and watering. For example, in Uganda, the proportion of households in which women managed fodder shrubs was over 80%. Comparing tree survival rates between men and women is one indicator of the degree to which they are able to manage tree technologies. The results of such analyses are mixed. In Kenya, male-headed households had somewhat higher survival rates for fodder shrubs than women (45% as compared to 31%) but the differences were highly variable and not significant. In Eastern Zambia, 47% of women and only 29% of men had survival rates for Sesbania sesban of over 75%, six months after planting. For Tephrosia vogelii men had somewhat higher survival rates than women. What are women’s preferences/rating of various tree species and motivation for planting trees? Men and women often have different objectives for planting trees. Men are usually interested in trees for commercial purposes while women are more inclined to tree products for subsistence use such as firewood, soil fertility improvement, fodder and fruits. This is reflected in the tree attributes that women prefer. In Malawi, women in female-headed households considered trees that grow fast as their first choice, followed by trees with good burning qualities and that produce a lot of charcoal. Men ranked trees that grow straight as their first choice; an indication that timber is their number one priority. Straightness was followed by trees that grow fast. Since both men and women equally use tree products, it is possible to manage tree enterprises for multiple products in a way that both men and women can benefit. A case in point is management and utilization of Grevillea robusta in the central highlands of Kenya, which is grown for both timber and fuelwood. Whereas women often have different planting objectives and evaluation criteria than men, we found remarkably little variation in the way they score different species on different criteria. How do women benefit from agroforestry? Women’s rights to tree products are usually limited to products that are considered to have little or no commercial value; men reserve higher value products for themselves. The products that women control are mainly indigenous fruits and vegetables, fodder and mulch. In terms of use, more men than women use timber products. The use of fodder shrubs is beneficial to women in many ways; the income obtained is normally used to pay school fees, general household improvement, fuelwood, fodder and improved nutrition of the family. Access to homegrown fodder and fuelwood from the prunings directly benefits women as it frees up their labour for other productive enterprises. Agroforestry practices for replenishing soil fertility are attractive to women farmers because they involve low inputs but high returns. Apart from the obvious benefit of improving soil fertility, reflected in the high maize yields, they also provide fuelwood and reduce the incidence of weeds such as Striga hermontheca. Indigenous fruits can provide women with significant income. Women earn US$ 7-US$ 36 per annum from shea kernel sales in Benin which may seem small, but it is significant to them because they are able to control it. In Tabora, Tanzania, women are generating income x Gender and agroforestry in Africa: Are women participating? through processing and selling of jam, wine and juice from indigenous fruits. They are earning between US$ 12 to US$ 30 per week through sale of juice. In Cameroon, income from Gnetum africanum is quite substantial with an average of US$2,629 per household per year. Having a woodlot in Malawi saves women 15-180 minutes a day. But the difference in monetary benefits between men and women is significant; male-headed households earn over three times as much income from the sale of woodlot products as do female-headed households. This difference may be attributed in part to the number of trees in a woodlot. Women-headed households on average have half as many trees but only 30% as much income as men. Do women have access to agroforestry information? Men receive many more extension visits than women and participate in more field days and other extension activities off the farm. The reasons for women’s low involvement is the bias of extension workers towards women, socio-cultural barriers limiting communication between male extension workers and women, and women’s lack of time to participate in extension activities off the farm. For the few women who are able to access extension services, some lack basic education and therefore their ability to use technical information is limited. Agroforestry product markets: are women involved? Where women are involved in marketing agroforestry products, they are usually confined to the small retail trade while men dominate the wholesale trade. Women traders also receive lower marketing margins than men. This is attributed to the fact that men usually have more stock than women, because they have access to more capital. Just as extension systems are generally biased towards men, market information systems also appear to primarily serve men. Only 20% of participants in the major market information systems of Kenya and Malawi are women. That women’s literacy level is lower than men’s presents another important disadvantage in marketing. These disadvantages mean that women fail to benefit equitably from the growing national and international markets. How do we promote efficient participation of women in agroforestry with greater benefits accruing to them? This review provides evidence that agroforestry has the potential to offer great benefits to women across Africa. Women are attracted to agroforestry because of minimal inputs needed, particularly with regard to cash, and the substantial benefits, in terms of food, fuelwood, fodder and other products and services that they get, particularly in times of need. This paper also shows that women face several limitations, which make them unable to get as much benefit from agroforestry enterprises as they should. Various technical, policy and institutional recommendations on how to promote efficient participation of women in agroforestry with greater benefits accruing to them are proposed in the paper. Recommendations will need to be location-specific and based on the households’ needs and circumstances. Household members will need to be involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation of the various interventions. Technological interventions Domestication of important agroforestry species Many tree products that benefit women are collected from wild populations in forests, woodlands/ rangelands, parklands or on farms. With the increase in population, some of the products are becoming scarce and women have to walk longer distances. Promoting participatory domestication will therefore enable integration of these valuable species into appropriate farming systems. In addition, various technologies that are socially, culturally and economically acceptable will be developed. The results of such an initiative will be appropriate propagation methods, cultivars that meet a range of market requirements such as fruit with specific size, taste, and maturity periods so that farmers, especially women, can have a year round flow of cash from agroforestry products. Development of appropriate storage and processing methods Many agroforestry products, particularly fruits, have a very short shelf life. It is therefore important to come up with appropriate techniques for improving the postharvest quality of on-tree and off-tree ripened fruits i.e. regulation of harvest time to maximize post-harvest fruit colour and sweetness; improving the artificial ripening under different post harvest incubation regimes and extended shelf life with and without refrigeration. The problem of limited shelf life can also be addressed through processing which ensures supplies for periods of shortage and improves product quality. Where there is market demand for such products, marketing of processed products can also increase women’s incomes. Most women still use traditional Gender and agroforestry in Africa: Are women participating? xi processing techniques that are strenuous and time consuming. Tools and practices to help women reduce the time taken and drudgery of tasks such as dehusking, drying kernels, land preparation and weeding will tremendously free women’s time which can otherwise be used in other productive activities. This should be accompanied with capacity building to develop women’s business and marketing skills. Policy interventions There are several policy interventions which have been suggested in the paper in order to ensure that women benefit from agroforestry. They are grouped into three key areas; extension services, access to market information and micro-finance. Access to extension services In order to ensure that extension services benefit women, deliberate gender-sensitive interventions need to be put in place. These may include: • Training more women extension officers, particularly to serve communities that have strong traditions that prohibit male extension officers from interacting with women farmers. • Targeting women’s groups for assistance. • Finding out from women which periods of the season and day they are most free to meet and holding meetings/field days/seminars at these times. • Holding separate meetings for men and women. • Organizing video show sessions for women who are not able to participate in tours. • Ensuring that at least half of those who participate in any activity are women. • Ensuring that extension activities address different interest groups i.e. women are more interested in products such as fruits, fuelwood and vegetables while men are more inclined towards trees for timber and poles. Access to market information For women to benefit from market information, deliberate effort must be made by governments and NGOs to specifically target women. Such a programme might involve subsidizing the provision of handsets to women or specialized training on how to use the service. With access to market information, women farmers can greatly reduce losses due to wastage for lack of buyers as they will be able to make informed decisions about when to produce, what to produce, for whom to produce and when and where to sell their produce. Improving women’s access to finance from microcredit institutions For many women to access financial credit, governments need to intervene to encourage the development of rural micro-credit institutions whose regulations are friendly to women. Intervention can be in the form of accepting other forms of collateral other than land such as machinery, furniture and other tangible assets that women may have, strengthening the capacity of existing social organizations such as women groups and linking these groups to financial institutions. Institutional interventions Women producers in sub-Saharan Africa are trapped at the production end of the value chain. So governments, NGOs and the private sector need to intervene by fostering women entrepreneurs, facilitating women to form and strengthen farmers’ groups or associations and link them up with markets and industry. By engaging in collective action women would be able to gain a more powerful position in the value chain which is advantageous in several ways: stronger bargaining power, bulk sales, bulk purchases of inputs, ensuring a sustainable supply of products, reduction in transaction costs, attract more and larger buyers, access outside resources, such as extension and development assistance, access to the lucrative fair-trade and other certified markets, and above all be able to contribute to the policy formulation process. Development of new products For women to compete favourably and also have an edge, they must diversify into high value new products such as oil, soap, juices, body lotions, wine, and leaf meal. This can often be done using the same raw materials. xii Gender and agroforestry in Africa: Are women participating? Research needs Several gaps were identified. These gaps if tackled will enable the scientific community, policy makers and development practitioners to understand fully how women across Africa are involved in agroforestry and thereby facilitate the development and implementation of projects that take into account gender issues. Key research areas for further investigation include: 1. Measuring actual income women receive from agroforestry, relative to non-agroforestry enterprises. 2. Assessing the effectiveness and impact of alternative dissemination methods on women’s participation and benefits. 3. Determining how different categories of women (e.g. female-headed households and women in male-headed households) benefit from agroforestry 4. Identifying success stories across Africa and assessing the factors that have contributed to their success. 5. Documenting cultural beliefs or taboos regarding tree planting and how they influence adoption of agroforestry by women across the African continent. 6. Determining how to help women to increase their participation in marketing and the amounts they earn from marketing. 7. Determining how gender roles influence women’s adoption of agroforestry. 8. Assessing how to help women increase their participation in traditional male tree crops such as coffee, cocoa and oil palm
Article
Full-text available
This paper reviews agroforestry's contribution to food security from a gender perspective. Emphasis is placed on women's contribution relative to men and the challenges they face. Agroforestry practices examined include fodder shrubs, ‘fertilizer trees’ and indigenous fruit trees. In examining the practices, we highlight women's and men's involvement in management, utilization and marketing of agroforestry products. The review shows that agroforestry makes a substantial contribution to food security. Furthermore, women are as actively involved as men; however, their level of participation and benefits are constrained by cultural norms and lack of resources. For women to benefit fully from agroforestry and hence contribute to food security, various policies, technological and institutional interventions are recommended.
Article
Full-text available
While decision-making processes of land managers drive landuse change and affect the provision of ecosystems services, there is no concrete understanding of whether gender specificity in decision-making influences the multifunctionality of landscapes. We distinguish eleven elements in a typical management cycle. In reviewing the literature, we found apparent gaps on gendered knowledge, preferences, risk taking and access to innovation in land-use decision making. Male and female responses in the adoption of agroforestry practices and other investment opportunities reflect differing exposure to and perceptions of risk. Innovative approaches such as agent-based models and role-playing games are currently applied to study gendered behavior in land-use decisions. These approaches can assist researchers to explicitly and empirically compare potentially self-reinforcing behaviors or feedback loops with local impacts on ecosystem services.
Article
Full-text available
Agroforestry is one of the most conspicuous land use systems across landscapes and agroecological zones in Africa. With food shortages and increased threats of climate change, interest in agroforestry is gathering for its potential to address various on-farm adaptation needs, and fulfill many roles in AFOLU-related mitigation pathways. Agroforestry provides assets and income from carbon, wood energy, improved soil fertility and enhancement of local climate conditions; it provides ecosystem services and reduces human impacts on natural forests. Most of these benefits have direct benefits for local adaptation while contributing to global efforts to control atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. This paper presents recent findings on how agroforestry as a sustainable practice helps to achieve both mitigation and adaptation objectives while remaining relevant to the livelihoods of the poor smallholder farmers in Africa.
Article
Full-text available
With the commercialization of agriculture, women are increasingly disadvantaged because of persistent gender-disparities in access to productive resources. Farmer collective action that intends to improve smallholder access to markets and technology could potentially accelerate this trend. Here, we use survey data of small-scale banana producers in Kenya to investigate the gender implications of recently established farmer groups. Traditionally, banana has been a women’s crop in Kenya. Our results confirm that the groups contribute to increasing male control over banana. While male control over banana revenues does not affect household food security, it has a negative marginal effect on dietary quality. We demonstrate that the negative gender implications of farmer groups can be reduced or avoided when women are group members themselves. In the poorest income segments, group membership even seems to have a positive effect on female-controlled income share. Some policy implications towards gender mainstreaming of farmer collective action are discussed.