ArticlePDF Available

Faunal diversity and threats of the Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve: A study from Assam, India

Authors:
  • G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment
  • G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment & Development

Abstract and Figures

The paper in an attempt to develop an inventory of faunal diversity of Dibru-Saikhwa Biosphere Reserve (DSBR) of Assam which is one of the important Biosphere Reserves of the Eastern Indian Himalaya and to highlight the threats that the BR is facing over the years so as to decisively support the need for conservation efforts. After compilation and analysis from various data sources the BR depicts the presence of 503 species of birds, 37 species of mammals, 42 species of reptiles, 17 species of amphibian, 104 species of fishes, 105 species of butterfly and 91 globally threatened faunal species, while the Soil microbial diversity in the BR is contributed by 26 soil micro-fungal forms. The rich biodiversity of the BR is under stress due to natural and human pressures. As per the recent studies, the BR has lost an area of 77.14km² due to revirine stress and 3.71km² has been encroached as per the State Forest Report.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ISSN: 2067-533X
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF
CONSERVATION SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 2, April-June 2016: 523-532
www.ijcs.uaic.ro
FAUNAL DIVERSITY AND THREATS OF THE DIBRU-SAIKHOWA
BIOSPHERE RESERVE: A STUDY FROM ASSAM, INDIA
Rangini NONGMAITHEM1, Mahendra Singh LODHI1*,
Prasanna Kumar SAMAL1, Pitamber Prasad DHYANI2, Subrat SHARMA2
1 G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development,
North East Unit, Vivek Vihar, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh (India), 791113
2 G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development,
Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand (India), 263643
Abstract
The paper in an attempt to develop an inventory of faunal diversity of Dibru-Saikhwa
Biosphere Reserve (DSBR) of Assam which is one of the important Biosphere Reserves of the
Eastern Indian Himalaya and to highlight the threats that the BR is facing over the years so as
to decisively support the need for conservation efforts. After compilation and analysis from
various data sources the BR depicts the presence of 503 species of birds, 37 species of
mammals, 42 species of reptiles, 17 species of amphibian, 104 species of fishes, 105 species of
butterfly and 91 globally threatened faunal species, while the Soil microbial diversity in the BR
is contributed by 26 soil micro-fungal forms. The rich biodiversity of the BR is under stress due
to natural and human pressures. As per the recent studies, the BR has lost an area of 77.14km2
due to revirine stress and 3.71km2 has been encroached as per the State Forest Report.
Keywords: Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere; Eastern Himalaya; Biodiversity; Protected Area.
Introduction
The Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve (DSBR), being located on the bank of mighty
Brahmaputra and resting in the lap of the Eastern Himalaya, enjoys a luxurious ecosystem and
shelters a number of rare and endangered faunal species, a wintering ground for many
migratory birds and many other threatened faunal species of the globe. It is one of the 19
biodiversity hotspot in the world. The Dibru-Saihkhowa is coroneted with the three prestigious
statuses, being a Sanctuary, National Park and a Biosphere Reserve as well. The core zone of
the DSBR is basically defined as the Dibru-Saikhowa National Park. Thus the need of research,
development and conservation in and around DSBR is even more important than other BRs in
the country.
The Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve lies between 27o30’ N to 27o45’ N latitude and
95o10’ to 95o45’ E longitude at an average altitude of 118m above the mean sea level. It is
located in Tinsukia and Dibrugarh District of Assam and the entire Reserve is located in the low
laying flood plain of the mighty Brahmaputra River and Lohit River bordering the North and
the Dibru River bordering the south. It was notified as a Sanctuary in 1986 and later as National
Park in 1999 and as Biosphere Reserve on 28/07/1997. It extens over an area of 765km2 of
which a 340km2 area is designated as a core zone and a 425km2 area as buffer zone with 14
* Corresponding author: mahen29.mail@gmail.com
R. NONGMAITHEM et al.
INT J CONSERV SCI 7, 2, APR-JUN 2016: 523-532
524
fringe villages. Laika and Dhadiya are the two forest village belonging to Mishing community
with 1500 household and approximate population of 10,500 people, located in the westernmost
part of the Reserve. The buffer zone is inhabited by 38 villages with a total population of 13405
people (that includes Assames, Bengali, Bihari and Tea Garden laborers). The DSBR is 40%
wetland of variable sizes and 25% grassland. The water bodies within the BR are in the form of
beels and chapories providing a unique habitat and supporting a rich aquatic biodiversity. Dibru
Saikhowa Biosphere has tropical monsoon climate with a hot and wet summer and cool and
usually dry winter and the main forest types found are moist mixed semi-evergreen forest, moist
mixed deciduous forest, littoral and swamp forest, canebrakes and grasslands. The annual
rainfall ranges from 2300mm to 3800mm which occurs mainly in the months of June, July,
August, and September. The average coldest and warmest temperature of the area ranges from 7
to 34°C. The river Brahmaputra has a major contribution maintaining the biodiversity of the
BR. The River has hundreds of tributaries and the extensive flood water has given rise to the
promotion of permanent marshes which are an important habitat for a varied aquatic fauna.
More than 3000 such marshes are scattered in the whole Brahmaputra valley. The riverine tract
of Brahmaputra river and its basin hosts rich and unique biodiversity and has been identified as
Important Bird Area by BNHS and Birdlife International in 2004.
Fig. 1. Location map of Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve, India
Methodology
The overall idea of preparing this manuscript was to present a holistic analysis of faunal
biodiversity of Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve at one place and therefore, information
regarding the faunal composition have been collected and compiled from different sources.
These different sources include published research paper, articles, books, unpublished reports
and other authentic online sources. The faunal biodiversity information of the BRs has also
been collected from regional office Zoological Survey of India, Assam State Biodiversity
Board, Forest Department, District Forest Range Office in the form of management plans etc.
The collected data was analyzed thoroughly and interpreted using online sources like IUCN
FAUNAL DIVERSITY AND THREATS OF THE DIBRU-SAIKHOWA BIOSPHERE RESERVE: ASSAM, INDIA
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 525
Red Data Version 1.3 so as to present the data with systematic taxonomic position and global
status.
Results
a. Faunal diversity in DSBR
A total of 808 faunal species have been found reported in different available sources,
represented as follows: 503 (62.25%) species of birds, 37 (4.53%) species of mammals, 42
(5.18%) species of reptiles, 17 (2.10%) species of Amphibian, 104 (12.87%) species of fish and
105 (12.99%) species of butterflies among invertebrates (Fig. 2). There are 91 (11.26%)
globally threatened faunal species reported from the DSBR. The threatened species comprise of
50 (54.94%) bird species, 18 (19.78%) mammalian species, 9 (9.89%) reptilian species and 15
(15.38%) species of fishes.
Fig. 2. Faunal Diversity of Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve, India.
Avifauna contributes to the maximum of 248 genera and 503 species, belonging to 19
order and 68 families. The order Passeriformes contributes with 232 (46.12%) spp. followed by
order falconiformes with 47 (9.43%) spp., charadriiformes with 41 (8.23%) spp., order
Anseriformes with 31 (6.22%) spp., ciconiiformes with 25 (5.02%) spp., order Piciformes with
19 (3.81%) spp., coraciiformes and gruiformes with 17 (3.41%) spp. each, cuculiformes with
16 (3.21%) spp., columbiformes with 15 (3.01%) spp., strigiformes with 14 (2.81%) spp.,
galliformes with 7 (1.40%) spp., Apodiformes with 6 (1.02%) spp., Pelecaniformes with 5 spp.,
order Psittaciformes with 4 spp., caprimulgiformes with 3 spp., isoetales with 2 spp. and 1 spp.
each from the podicipediformes and trongoniformes order.
The 37 mammalian species reported belong to 32 genera, 22 families and 11 orders. The
highest number of species, 12 (3.33%) is represented by the order Carnivora, followed by the
order Rodentia with 6 (16.21%) spp., Primate with 6 (16.21%) spp. and order Cetartiodactyla
also with 6 spp., while the rest of the orders, Insectivora, Cetacea, Chiroptera, Pholitoda
Perisodactyla, lagomorpha and Proboscidea are contributing with only 1 species each. The
dominant families contributing with the maximum number of species are Sciuridae, Felidae,
Cercopithecidae, Cervidae, Herpestidae and Canidae. The families Bovidae, Elephantidae,
Equidae, Suidae,Platanistidae, Viverridae,Ursidae, Hylopatidae, Lorisidae,Manidae, Talpidae,
Soricidae, Pteropodidae, Mustelidae and Leporidae are contributing with at least 1 species.
The 42 species of Reptiles belong to 2 orders and 10 families. The order Squamata
exhibits a maximum species of 31 (73.8%) while the order Testudine contributes with a total of
11 (26.19%) species. The family Colubridae exhibit a maximum number of species of 19
R. NONGMAITHEM et al.
INT J CONSERV SCI 7, 2, APR-JUN 2016: 523-532
526
(45.23%), followed by the family Geomydidae with 7 (16.66%) spp. family Trionychidae with
4 (9.52%) species and 2 (4.76%) species each by the family Gekkonidae, Varanidae and
Typhlopidae, while the family Viperidae contributes with only 1 (2.3%) species.
The Amphibian fauna exhibits a total of 10 genera and 17 species belonging to 5
families, Order Anura. The dominant genera contributing with the maximum number of species
are Fejervarya, Hylarana, Polypedates and Chiromantis. The Family Dicroglossidae
contributes with a total species of 6 (35.29%), Rhacophoridae with 5 (29.41%) species,
Ranidae with 4 (23.52%) species while the family Microhylidae and Bufonidae are contributing
with only 1 (5.88%) species each.
A total of 64 genera and 104 species of fish fauna belonging to 29 families and 11 orders
were reported on the reserve. The family Cyprinidae exhibited a maximum number of species
of 34 (32.69%), followed by the family Bagridae with 13 (12.5%) species, family Channidae
with 7 (6.73%) species, family Sisoridae with 5 (4.80%) species. The dominant genera are
Chanda, Labeo, Puntius, Mystus and Barilius. The order Cypriniformes is represented by 39
(37.5%) species, followed by the order Siluriformes with 33 (31.73%) species, Perciformes
contributes 20 (19.23%) species, Synbranchiformes with 3 species while the orders
Osteoglossiformes and Mugiliformes are contributing with only 2 species each and the last 5
orders, Anguilliformes, Archeopulomonata, Beloniformes, Clupeiformes and Tetradontiformes
are contributing with at least 1 species each.
The invertebrate fauna is represented by 73 genera and 105 species of butterfly
belonging to 5 families and order Lepidoptera. The family Nymphalidae dominates by
contributing with 45 (42.85%) species, followed by the family Lycaenidae with 21 (20%) spp.,
Pieridae with 17 (16.19%) spp., Papilionidae with 15 (14.28%) spp., and Hesperiidae with 7
(6.7%) spp. While soil microbial diversity of the BR is comprised by 26 soil micro-fungal
forms, species like Aspergillus, Penicillium and Rhizopus are the most common ones.
There are 50 (9.9%) species of globally threatened avifauna reported in the BR. The
avifaunal species that are winters visitor or migrant in the BR include Anser indicus, Tadorna
ferruginea, Anas crecca, Tringa nebularia, Sturnus vulgaris, Monticola rufiventris , Anthus
roseatus, Phylloscopus fuscatus, Turdus ruficollis, Sylvia curruca, Phylloscopus coronatus,
Seicercus castaniceps, Seicercus burkii, Niltava sundara, Bradypterus seebohmi, Calidris
subminuta etc. Among the11 turtle species recorded, a total of 8 (19.04%) species were globally
threatened and 15 fish species are found globally threatened.
The DSBR supports a variety of floral elements, comprised of 680 species of plants,
belonging to 464 genera and 143 families, all represented by 511 species of dicotyledonous
plants and 169 species of monocotyledons plants. There are more than 25 species of orchids
Discussion
The DSBR is the proposed Ramsar site and falls in the course of two major international
fly-ways of migratory birds. The area is known as a major haunting grounds of the globally
threatened White-winged Duck Cairina scutulata, Black-breasted Parrotbill Paradoxornis
flavirostris and Marsh Babbler Pellorneum palustre. The DSBR shelters a small population of
feral horses as well. Some of the key fauna of the DSBR includes Asian Elephant Elephas
maximus, Tiger Panthera tigris, Leopard P. pardus, Sloth Bear Melursus ursinus, Slow Loris
Nycticebus coucang, Pigtailed Macaque Macaca nemestrina, Rhesus Macaque M. mulatta,
Assamese Macaque M. assamensis, Capped Langur Trachypithecus pileatus, Barking Deer
Muntiacus muntjak, Hog Deer Axis porcinus, Flying Squirrel Petaurista sp., Gangetic River
Dolphin Plantanista gangetica, Monitor Lizards Varanus bengalensis, V. salvator, various
turtles including Kachuga sylhetensis, snakes including Indian Cobra Naja naja and Indian
Rock Python Python molurus. Assam Roof Turtle Kachuga sy lhetensis etc. The avifauna of the
BR was extensively studied, specifically by Choudhury [1-5], Kazmierczak & Allen [6],
FAUNAL DIVERSITY AND THREATS OF THE DIBRU-SAIKHOWA BIOSPHERE RESERVE: ASSAM, INDIA
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 527
Dwivedi [7], Allen [8] and Talukdar [9]. The DSBR has been surveyed and studied several
times in the recent years and its rich faunal resources have been reported by various authors,
namely primates and other higher mammals by Choudhary [4, 10-12].
The wetlands in the form of marshes, swamps, chapories (river islands and sandbanks)
and grassland in the DSBR support quite a lot of threatened faunal species of the Globe. The
grasslands, which are dominated by Impreta cylindrical and Saccharum spontaneum and the
islands with a mosaic of various grass species are the ideal habitat for Bengal florican, nesting
ground for Swamp Partridge Francolinus gularis and Peafowl Pavo cristatus. The tall moist
alluvial grassland in the flood plain of Brahmaputra is also the unique habitat for endangered
Great Indian one horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), pygmy hog (Parcula salvanius),
Hispid hare etc.
a. Threats to rich diversity and unique ecosystem of Dibru-Saikhowa BR:
Even though the DSBR is a repository of rich faunal resources, the BR is fragile and
vulnerable to innumerable threats. Flood is the major natural threat to the BR, because it can
cause habitat destruction and land use change. The BR is surrounded from all sides by rivers, 10
of them, namely Bhramaputra, Nao Dihing, Lohit, Dibru, Siang, Debang, Kundli, Tengapani,
Dotung and Dangori and is absorbing the brunt of annual multi-wave flood. The Brahmaputra
River with its braided channels is characterized by its exceedingly large flow, enormous volume
of sediment load, continuous change in channel morphology, rapid bed aggradations, bank line
erosion and recession. Within 25 years (1986- 2011) a total loss of about 846 km2 area has been
caused by the Brahmaputra River system due to bank-line erosion [13]. The BR suffers
immensely during heavy rainfall leading to frequent flooding. Flooding hits the BR on an
average two to three times almost every year. Theses recurring floods change the river course
causing erosion and siltation. The BR management Committee has reported that a landmass of
about 66 km2 has been eroded from the BR, but the area increased to 77.15 km2 as per the
recent records [14] due to recurring reverine stresses of Lohit-Brahmaputra, Burhi-Dangori and
Dibru Rivers.
Fig 3. Landmass loss from Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve due to Erosion.
R. NONGMAITHEM et al.
INT J CONSERV SCI 7, 2, APR-JUN 2016: 523-532
528
The BR is also taking the burden of human dependence which is also putting pressure in
many ways on the ecosystem of the BR. The number of households in the two forest villages,
Dadhiya and Laika in the core region has increased from 210 (in 1951) to 1500 at present. The
main source of livelihood of the community is cattle rearing, fishing and agriculture and milk
production is the major activity. There are about 24 Khutties (Milk producing centre) in the
area. A human population of more than 10,000 is depending on the surrounding forests of
Dibru-Saikhowa almost for everything. Out of the total population, 71% collects firewood and
other housing materials, 44% for food collection, and 29% for fishing and more than 32% of the
total population pastures the cattle every day in the grassland [15]. In the recent years, the cattle
population has increased many folds, which ultimately increased the pressure on the grassland
itself. 38 villages in the buffer also put additional pressure on the BR. The grassland of DSBR
is home for endemic bird species namely Marsh Babbler (Pellorneum pulestre) and Manipur
Bush Quail (Perdicula manipurensis). Raidang Grassland is one such grassland inhabited by
endemic bird species Black breasted Parrot Bill (Paradoxornis flavirostris) and due to heavy
grazing of the domestic animals, the population of the bird has been impacted [14]. Few years
back the BR revealed the presence of 80 feral horses but as per recent study only 40 remains.
According to the Assam State Forest report, about 3.7km2 of the BR have been encroached and
the original 0.5km2 of the settlement has been expanded to roughly 5km2 [15-17].
Overharvesting of wild resources, poaching, timber smuggling and trapping of wild
animals are also a serious threat to DSBR. Different body parts of endemic Bengal slow loris
Nycticebus bengalensis are used as medicine to heal many diseases among the local tribes of
NE India and this is causing serious threat to this particular species in the region [12]. The
wetland in the BR is threatened due to anthropogenic pressure like Unsustainable levels of
grazing by livestock and fishing using chemical that have adverse affect on the aquatic lives
namely one of the important macrophyte Euryale Ferox (locally known as nikori) has been
totally wiped out from the BR and commercially important Trapa once abundant is now
restricted to some wetlands in the DSBR. Fishing nets caused hindrance to the free movement
aquatic bird and other aquatic faunal species like Endangered Gangetic Dolphin. Another threat
which may not be very serious at present but can significantly affect the ecology of the BR in
longer runs is the encroachment of the land (especially the fertile river beds) by the peoples
settling down within the BR. The silt is brought in during high flows/floods, blocks parts of the
river channel, thereby creating semi-dry patches of land and the people living here started
filling this with sand or garbage for use. This alteration in the morphology can change the
character, functions, values and appearance of wetlands. In recent times, there is an increased in
agricultural activities, overharvesting of thatch grasses, firewood and logging for household
used and as source of income. Another threat is unsustainable sand mining from the riverbeds
which is creating disturbance to aquatic life and habitat.
Impact of different existing and upcoming hydropower projects can also be considered
as one of the potential threat to the diversity and ecosystem of the BR. The River Debang is one
of the major tributaries of the Brahmaputra river system, contributing with about 8.5% of the
annual discharge of river Brahmaputra. The Combined flow of Lohit River and Debang River
meets the Brahmaputra near Kobo Chapori of Dibru-Saikhiwa Complex. The Debang River
basin has a catchment area of 2775km2 in the flood plains of Assam. The three large mega
projects located in the close vicinity of the BR are Demwe Lower HEP (1750 MW) on Lohit
River, Dibang Multipurpose HEP (3000 MW) on Dibang River and Lower Siang HEP (2700
MW) on Siang River. These three hydroelectric power projects are seriously gigantic and
therefore, their impacts will also be significant. Drastic fluctuation of water during the lean
period will have an adverse impact on the Gangetic dolphin’s feeding and migration habit.
Smaller variations in water levels result in large variations in the spread of water area leading to
FAUNAL DIVERSITY AND THREATS OF THE DIBRU-SAIKHOWA BIOSPHERE RESERVE: ASSAM, INDIA
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 529
submergence. The minimum discharge (6 cumec for about 18 hours in a day) during winter will
affect the river ecosystem as well as the ecology of the connecting wetlands.
There is proposal for the use of 114.267ha of non-forested land falling within 10km from
the boundary of Dibru-Saikhowa BR to be used for laying crude-oil and gas pipelines by Oil
India Ltd. This is also another upcoming issue that will have a high impact on the biodiversity
of the DSBR. There are risks during the drilling process and of leakage and spilling as well in
the wetlands, which will impact the ecology of the area and the livelihood of the people living
in the fringe area of the Biosphere Reserve.
b. Conservation Strategies for the DSBR under BR approach
Keeping in mind the main objectives towards the establishment of BRs, the following
strategies have been put forward for the conservation and preservation of DSBR:
RET species: The DSBR is a home for many endemic and restricted range faunal
species and the BR becomes an isolated patch of land forming an island, a “River
Island”. Due to its isolated and unique location, there its prevalence of endemism and
river is an effective barrier for restricted movement and dispersal of many species
namely the large mammalian species and primate species. The Bengal slow loris
Nycticebus bengalensis which is endemic to South and South East Asia is distributed
in the north East Region of India only and the BR is one such critical habitat [12]. The
BR is the home for many globally threatened and rare fauna. The grassland of the BR
is an important habitat for Greater Adjutant, one of the rarest storks in the world,
Critically Endangered Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis and Whitewinged
wood duck,Cairina scutula . It is the breeding ground for Spot-billed Pelican
Pelecanus philippensis that survives in Assam, mainly along the Brahmaputra Valley,
especially in the Dibru-Saikhowa BR.
The grassland as the feeding and sheltering ground: Dibru-Saikhowa is among the
most important wintering sites in Assam of the Black Stork Ciconia nigra, critically
threatened Adrea insignis and other such global migratory avian species. The
grasslands of DSBR are an important grazing ground for Asiatic wild buffalo. The
alluvial grassland of the DSBR is an unique habitat of Bengal florican and supports
number of globally threatened and endangered species like Great Indian one horned
rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), pygmy hog (Parcula salvanius), Hispid hare
(Caprolagus hispidus).
Potential Corridor: The DSBR serves as a vital route for the movement of Asiatic
elephant; Elephas maximus [18]. The Brahmaputra River islands, including the BR,
could be a potential corridor for dispersing tiger and major preying site in most of the
part of the Reserve [19].
Important habitat and habitat recovery site: There are 97 locations which are identified
as Important Dolphin Habitat in the whole Brahmaputra River and of which 14 are
considered as threatened habitat of Ganges Dolphin Platanista gangetica which
includes the Saikhowa Balijan and Baluchar Balijan of DSBR [20]. The BR is the
prioritized site for the Conservation of critically endangered Indian Gharial Gavialis
gangeticus [21].
Important of Wetlands : The presence of numerous wetlands in the DSBR which are in
the form of chapories, swamps, lakes, marshes and beels supporting wide range of
species, as an important feeding and breeding areas for wildlife and provide a stopping
place and refuge for waterfowls and other global migratory bird species as well.
Maguri-Motapung beel wetland Complex is an important bird area in the DSBR [22],
R. NONGMAITHEM et al.
INT J CONSERV SCI 7, 2, APR-JUN 2016: 523-532
530
has plenty of Magur (catfish), named after it and the beel has been the main source of
food and sustenance for the people who live around it as well. It nourishes, sustains
and protects life in myriad ways.
The Aquatic Plants as medicine and food: About 65% of the macrophyte recorded
from the DSBR has medicinal value while several are used as food namely Euryle
ferox, trapa, sagittaria nymphoid spp. etc. and fodder also. Submerged Plants like
Hydrilla are the oxygen generator of aquatic system, they acts water purifiers.
The Socio-economic condition of the indigenous Mishing community inhabiting inside
the BR needs to enhance for the better management of the BR.
Conclusion
The DSBR indeed is a treasure of huge faunal wealth and the exploration of this treasure
never ends. Forest exploitation is the commonest cause of habitat degradation and habitat loss.
Inaccessible terrain and difficult topography can play an important role in conservation of any
protected area [23], whereas the DSBR is quite accessible and therefore, the level of threats is
little redundant. The people living in and around any protected area are the real custodians of
the resources and hence their development needs to go parallel along with the ecosystem
development, Ecotourism can play an important role. Apart from the population pressure, the
DSBR is also facing the pressure of developmental activities mainly hydropower projects.
Although Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is there to mitigate the possible impacts of
any such developmental project, in actual practice it’s extremely difficult to cover all the
impacts and manage them under EIA only at once [24]. Thus for the protected areas, some
special plans/program and task forces should be implemented. The development, sustainability
and livelihood should go hand in hand for the effective conservation of natural resources. The
conservation strategies mentioned above have clearly defined the major course of action for
better conservation of the existing biodiversity of the DSBR and also for the integrated
development for the human and wildlife within the BR. Now, interlinking the results and
analysis on the species database and threats, the conservation strategies can be further
restructured for better implementation.
Wetlands are the most important habitat and are crucial for the survival of most of the
threatened bird species but unfortunately they are the most threatened habitats of the world and
DSBR is predominantly a wetland ecosystem. Wetlands in India support around 2400 species
and subspecies of birds. The Wetlands supports an appreciable assemblage of rare, vulnerable
or endangered species or subspecies of plant which serves as food, fodder and medicines at the
same time. This further stresses upon the importance for conservation and management of the
DSBR. Despite being an accessible landscape the DSBR still seems to be a data deficient region
when it comes to reliable database on damages caused by the seasonal floods. The BR faces
potential floods every year which certainly cause some damage to the wildlife but there is no
quantification of such information so far, thus further research is needed to study the DSBR.
References
[1] A. Choudhury, Bird Survey of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary, Oriental Bird Club
Bulletin, 22, 1995, pp. 15-18
[2] A. Choudhury, The Status of Birds of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India,
Oriental Bird Club Bulletin, 25, 1997, pp. 27-29.
[3] A. Choudhury, Birds of Dibru-Saikhowa National Park and Biosphere Reserve, Assam,
India, Indian Birds, 2(4), 2006, pp. 95-105.
FAUNAL DIVERSITY AND THREATS OF THE DIBRU-SAIKHOWA BIOSPHERE RESERVE: ASSAM, INDIA
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 531
[4] A. Choudhury, Mammals, birds and reptiles of Dibru-Saikhowa Sanctuary, Assam, India,
Oryx International Journal of Conservation, 32(3), 1998, pp.192-200.
[5] A. Choudhury, Surveys of the White-winged Duck and the Bengal Florican in Tinsukia,
District and Adjacent Areas of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, The Rhino Foundation
for nature in North East India, Guwahati, 1996.
[6] K. Kazmierezak, D. Allen, A short ornithological survey of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife
Sanctuary, Newsletter of Birdwatchers, 37, 1997, pp. 84-85.
[7] K.K. Dwivedi, Incredible Dibru-Saikhowa national Park, Dibru-Saikhowa Conservation
Society, Tinsukia, Assam, 2009.
[8] D. Allen, A Bird Survey of the Amarpur area of the Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve,
Assam, India, Forktail, 18, 2002, pp. 87-91.
[9] B.K. Talukdar, Waders of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, Wader Study
Group Bulletin, 80, 1996, pp. 80-81.
[10] A. Choudhury, A survey of hoolock gibbon (Hylobates hoolock) in Dibru-Saikhowa
National Park, Assam, India, Primate Report, 56, 2000, pp. 61-66.
[11] K. Das, R. Nath, P. Azad, Soil Microbial Diversity of Dibru-saikhowa Biosphere Reserve
Forest of Assam, India, Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Biological
Science, 13(3), 2013, pp. 1-8.
[12] N. Das, J. Biswas, J. Das, P.C. Ray, A. Sangma, Population status, ecology and threats
of one of the least Known primate species, Bengal slow loris (Nycticebus bengalensis)
in the Protected Areas of Assam, India, Final Report to Rufford Small Grant
Foundation, Primate Research Centre NE India, Guwahati, Assam, India, 2009.
[13] M.P. Gogoi, B. Gogoi, S. Hazarika, P. Borgohain, GIS based study of fluvio-morphology of
the River Brahmaputra in the part of Upper Assam, NE India, Journal of Frontline
Research in Arts and Science, 2, 2012, pp. 114-121.
[14] K. Kalita, Dibru-Saikhowa National Park, Assam – An observation, Research Front, 3(4),
2015, pp.97-102.
[15] G. Deka, Mode of Human Interaction and adjustment to the Forest Environment: A case
Study in Dibrusaikhowa national park, Tinsukia, Assam, ICHR Sponsored National
Seminar on “Relation between the Environment Awareness and Its conservation
during Vedic period and of Present Time”, Kooba P.G. College, Dariyapur, Azamgarh
02-03 February, 2012.
[16] S. Yashwant, Troubled Dibru-Saikhowa, Sanctuary Asia, 33(3), 2013, available online at
http://www.sanctuaryasia.com/magazines/cover-story/9387-troubled-dibru-saikhowa.html,
[accesed at 22.05.2014].
[17] A.A. Hazarika, A preliminary survey on the Status Tigers (Panthera Tigris) in Dibru-
Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve, Tigerpaper, Regional Quarterly Bulletin on Wildlife and
National Park management, 29(1), 2002, pp. 17-21.
[18] A. Choudhury, V. Menon, Conservation of Asian Elephant in North East India, Gajah, 25,
2006, pp. 47-60.
[19] J. Borah, M.F. Ahmed, P.K. Sarma, Brahmaputra Rivers Islands as potential corridor for
Dispersing Tigers, A case Study from Assam, India, International Journal of
Biodiversity and Conservation, 2(11), 2010, pp. 350-358.
[20] A. Wakid, G. Braulik, Protection of Endangered Ganges River Dolphin in
Bhramaputra River, Assam, India, Final Technical Report to Sir Peter Scott Fund,
IUCN, 2009.
[21] A. Das, A.K. Das, P.K. Sharma, A.K. Singh, An assessment of assisted recovery of gharial
(Gavialis gangeticus) in river systems of Northeast India, Proceedings of the 22nd
R. NONGMAITHEM et al.
INT J CONSERV SCI 7, 2, APR-JUN 2016: 523-532
532
Working Meeting of the IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland,
Switzerland, 2013, pp. 28-35.
[22] P. Baruah, Trip Report: Maguri-Motapung Beel, Upper Assam, India,
http://www.cloudbirders.com/tripreport/repository/BARUAH_India_12_2010.pdf,
[accessed at 22.05.2014].
[23] N. Rangini, M.S. Lodhi, Samal P.K., S. Sharma, P.P. Dhyani, Review of Fauna of Dehang-
Debang Biosphere Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh (India), Nature and Science, 11(9), 2013,
pp. 8-13.
[24] D.K. Agrawal, M.S. Lodhi, S. Panwar, Are EIA studies sufficient for Indian Himalayan
Region?, Current Science, 98(2), 2010, pp. 154-161.
Received: August, 05, 2015
Accepted: April, 28, 2016
... These people have thus established a sustainable connection with the local forest ecosystem. Tree cutting, conversion of forest to agricultural land (Jhum farming), excessive domestic animal grazing, usage of firewood and timber for residential and commercial purposes, fishing, and hunting are all damaging and affecting the corridor's overall environment [26]. Due to the high pace of population increase, dependency on the forests is growing as well, surpassing the level of exploitation almost a decade earlier [27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) helps tribal communities adapt to socio-ecological changes, improving the long-term sustainability of their livelihood strategies and fostering social-ecological resilience. TEK provides thorough understanding of ecosystem dynamics, as well as how they relate to societal norms, practices, and resource use patterns. The integrity of TEK is often in jeopardy due to changes in belief systems, regional languages, traditional ways of subsistence, and disruption of traditional social-ecological systems. Landscape restoration has the ability to promote self-determination while safeguarding the livelihoods, beliefs, cultural, and biodiversity of indigenous peoples. However, there is a substantial knowledge gap on how TEK might aid ecosystem restoration, particularly in elephant corridors. Methods: The current study focused on gathering traditional ecological knowledge on the woody tree species from the Dering-Dibru Saikhowa Elephant Corridor using semi-structured interviews, group discussions, and direct observations. The acquired data were applied to heat map cluster analysis and ordination techniques using R software version 4.0.0. Results: Traditional usage information of 31 tree species utilized for food, fodder, timber, fuelwood, medicinal, and livelihood by local people was gathered. Most of the species utilized locally belonged to the families Combretaceae and Fabaceae. The species were classified into single, double, or multi-uses based on the extent of utilization. Azadirachta indica, Phyllanthus emblica, and Syzygium cumini (six each) had the highest utilization, while Mesua ferrea had the lowest. Chionanthus ramiflorus, Artocarpus heterophyllus, and Dillenia indica were among the plants valuable to wildlife, providing both forage and habitat for a wide variety of birds and animals. Artocarpus heterophyllus, Averrhoa carambola, Mangifera indica, P. emblica, Psidium guajava, and S. cumini were among the plants important for the livelihoods of the local community. Our findings demonstrated that local people were knowledgeable about the plant species to use as pioneer species, such as Bombax ceiba, Albizia lebbeck, D. indica, S. cumini, P. emblica, Lagerstroemia speciosa, and Alstonia scholaris, for habitat restoration in a diverse habitat. We classified the habitat of the enlisted species into different categories, and two clusters (clusters 1 and 2) were identified based on the similarity of woody species in different habitats. We prioritized multiple tree species for eco-restoration using the information collected through TEK. We planted 95,582 saplings on 150 hectares in the Dering-Dibru Saikhowa Elephant Corridors' degraded habitat patches, which will serve as future reference site for landscape rehabilitation. Out of total saplings planted, 56% of the species were linked to native communities through ethnobotanical uses, as well as providing connectivity and habitat for elephant movement, 16% of all woody species are pioneer species to colonize a degraded habitat, 15% of all woody species are preferred food and foraging by wildlife, and 13% of the species as a source of livelihood for local people, incorporating social, economic, cultural, and biodiversity benefits into the restoration framework. Conclusion: The current study also provides insights how the TEK can assist with aspects of ecological restoration, from reference ecosystem reconstruction and adaptive management through species selection for restoration, monitoring, and evaluation of restoration effectiveness.
... At least one juvenile gangetic dolphin and many aquatic birds were killed in the initial days of oil spillage. The mortality of fish and birds were however, decreased after the monsoon rain and resultant flood [8]. ...
... Forest disturbances altered the forest composition, structure, and species and lead to lower carbon stocks as reported by numerous studies (Gough et al.2007;Gough et al 2008;Nave et al. 2010;Wekesa et al. 2016). As a part of the biodiversity hotspot, Dibru-Saikhowa biosphere reserve provides suitable shelters for the large number of globally threatened faunal and floral elements, which include 50 bird species, 18 mammalian species, 9 reptilian species, 15 species of are threatened fish species, and habitat to various butterfly species (Choudhury 2006;Joshi and Dhayani 2014;Nongmaithem et al. 2016). ...
Article
In the present study, the tree species phytosociological attributes, tree density, basal area, and tree biomass carbon (above- and below-ground) distribution pattern was explored in the undisturbed and disturbed forest sites in Dibru-Saikhowa biosphere reserve of Assam, northeast India. The study area is globally recognized biodiversity hotspots in India and situated in the flood plain of the Brahmaputra and Lohit River. The tree species attributes like tree density, basal area, and tree biomass carbon were estimated in three undisturbed and disturbed forest sites. Principal component analysis, redundancy analysis, and correlation analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between biodiversity indices, forest stands characteristic, and tree biomass. The undisturbed forest stand showed the highest biological attributes (29–39 species and 25–33 genera) compare to disturbed forest stands (27–32 species and 21–27 genera). Combretaceae, Lauraceae, Phyllanthaceae, Salicaceae, Myrtaceae, and Moraceae has shown a higher importance value index. The biodiversity indices were significantly higher in undisturbed forest stands and the Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′) ranged from 1.97 to 3.57, Simpson index (Cd) ranged from 0.76 to 0.88, and evenness index (e) ranged from 0.65 to 0.97 in all the stands. The mean tree density and forest basal area were significantly higher in the undisturbed forest (796.66 ha−1 and 56.56 m2 ha−1, respectively) compared to disturbed forest stands (436.66 ha−1 and 38.91 m2 ha−1, respectively). Tree biomass carbon in undisturbed forest (184–214.62 Mg C ha−1) was also more than disturbed forests (124–137.53 Mg C ha−1). Moreover, the biomass carbon was greatly affected by the tree composition, diversity, density, and the disturbances in forest stands. The present study will provide the baseline information for effective and sustainable tree species diversity conservation and evaluate tree carbon stock in the Dibru-Saikhowa biosphere reserve.
Article
The present study tries to analyze the spatio-temporal changes in Dibru Saikhowa National Park (DSNP) which is the home to critically endangered species and its water bodies with the avail of GIS and an ARIMA model. The significance of the study is to understand the changes in the DSNP for the conservation efforts and to mitigate the impact of river dynamics on its ecosystem. The study was conducted based on the period of 35 years i.e. 1986–2021. For the identification of the spatio-temporal changes, Landsat data of USGS were taken into consideration. The study also makes use of supervised classification to understand the changes in the land cover (especially water bodies) of the DSNP. The study reveals a positive change in the water bodies but this change demonstrates the shrinkage of the boundary of the national park. The net shrinkage of the DSNP was observed to be 87.28 km2 during 1986–2021. Similarly, the water bodies changed from 8.88 km2 to 35.80 km2 (an increase of 26.92 km2) during the studied period. However, the highest depletion of the area was found during the period 1991–1996, during this period the national park lost about 29.88 km2. The forecast values of the ARIMA model revealed that the declining trend of the DSNP is the same as that of the observed values in the time series. The model reveals that the area of the park shall be reduced by 13.15 km2 in both the periods between 2021–2026 and 2026–2031. Such changes can pose greater threat to the forest ecosystem in near future. Overall, the findings of the research may be helpful for the policy makers and planners to adopt holistic approaches for the protection and conservation of the unique ecosystem of DSNP.
Article
Dibru-Saikhowa National Park (DSNP) comprises 340 km2 of core zone of Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve in Assam, India. DSNP receives on average 3000-3500 tourists every year. Most of the visitors were on independent holidays often coming to the DSNP. Most of the visitors coming from outside the northeastern states are coming to DSNP as the second destination after the Kaziranga National Park, which is about 300 km from the DSNP. Recreational value of DSNP was estimated by using Travel Cost Method. Results show that the average consumer surplus per tourist per visit accruing to domestic tourists was Rs. 2892.50 and total annual recreational value of the DSNP was Rs. 10.11 million which is almost 40 times the total revenue (Rs. 2.50 lakh) earned by the DSNP in a year. This clearly shows that revenue collected through entry fee is not reflecting the true economic value of recreational services of the DSNP. The results of the study provide enough justification for enhanced investment from government in the DSNP to ensure continued flow of essential ecosystem services.
Article
Full-text available
An experiment was carried out in five different sampling sites viz. Kalia, Miripathar, Bordubi, Holokhbari and Surkey area of Saikhowa range of Dibru-Saikhowa Biosphere Reserve (DSBR) Forest of Assam, India in respect of seasonal and depth wise variations in bacterial and fungal populations. The Biosphere Reserve Forest is situated in flood plain area of the mighty Brahmaputra and the Dibang rivers. Bacterial and fungal population was highest during spring season in all sites respectively. The highest microbial counts were recorded in the top soil (0-10 cm) layer except during the summer season when the population was greater in the subsurface (10-20 cm) layer. Altogether, 26 soil micro-fungal forms were recorded from five sites. Aspergillus and Penicillium were the abundant genera in all sites. Over all, soil was sandy loam and slightly alkaline in all sites. Soil organic C, total N and available P decreased with increasing soil depth. Parameters viz. water holding capacity, soil moisture content, pH, organic C, total N and available P had correlated with the microbial colony forming units (cfu). Available P revealed a significant positive correlations with bacterial and fungal cfu as well as inverse correlations with water holding capacity, organic C and organic matter.
Article
Full-text available
A Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographical Information System (GIS) based study has been carried out in part of upper Assam valley, NE India to delineate two important fluviomorphological changes that took placed in the confluences of Dihang, Dibang and Lohit rivers; and in increasing valley width of the River Brahmaputra. The study is conducted with TM+ and MSS 25 years time gapped satellite imageries of year 1986 and 2011. This study reveals that within this period by the phenomena of river capturing the main stream of Lohit river is diverted along Dangori river and presently flows along the south of Dibrusaikhowa. As a consequence of this divergence, the confluence point of Dibang and Lohit rivers which was formerly located at Saikhowaghat, near Sadiya at northeast of Dibrusaikhowa, is shifted towards southwestern side of Dibrusaikhowa by about 59.76 km in valley length (areal about 54 km). However, the confluence between Dibang and Dihang rivers shifted westward about 3.34 km from the Kobo Chapori. The changes were also attributed by broadening of the valley width of the rivers. There is a total loss of 846 km 2 area due to migration of river bank lines or river enlargement up to 86% of the original size measured in 1986. The average rate of bank line migration is about 115m per year in some sections.
Article
Full-text available
We present the first scientific study on Brahmaputra River Islands as potential corridors for the tigers and other animals to move across the region in Assam, India. The study was carried out from February to April 2009, with a goal to ensure connectivity and long term conservation of meta-population of tigers in the Brahmaputra Valley in central Assam landscape of India. We did sign surveys and line transects to determine the carnivore and herbivore presence in the area. A total of 52 islands were sampled, out of which 11 islands showed tiger presence while almost all the islands showed ungulate presence. Positive relationship was seen between livestock presence and tiger sign. The study through its activities has been able to identify the islands and river banks that are being used by tigers to move within and from one island to another or to nearby protected area in the landscape, particularly the four closely place parks, viz. Kaziranga, Orang, Laokhowa and Burhachapori and the meta-populations within them. We suggest measures to save the landscape from encroachment and denudation. The entire landscape needs improvised conservation and management strategies for long term survival of the threatened species like tigers.
Article
Full-text available
The Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) with its major river systems has vast potential for hydropower development. Recognizing this potential, the Government of India in its recent initiative for 50,000 MW power generation proposes to develop several hydropower projects in the IHR. Based on the understanding of the prevailing policy framework of the country for hydropower development, a case study of Alaknanda catchment located in Uttarakhand (part of the IHR) is presented. The catchment is endowed with vast hydropower potential; however, in the present study, some of the important social and environmental issues are raised that arise due to dense allocation of hydropower projects in the ecologically sensitive Himalayan region. It is recognized that in the Himalayan region which is important from the conservation point of view, project-specific Environmental Impact Assessment studies are probably insufficient to tackle the environmental issues that are likely to result on account of the proposed hydropower projects.
Bird Survey of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary
  • A Choudhury
A. Choudhury, Bird Survey of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary, Oriental Bird Club Bulletin, 22, 1995, pp. 15-18
The Status of Birds of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary
  • A Choudhury
A. Choudhury, The Status of Birds of Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India, Oriental Bird Club Bulletin, 25, 1997, pp. 27-29.
Birds of Dibru-Saikhowa National Park and Biosphere Reserve
  • A Choudhury
A. Choudhury, Birds of Dibru-Saikhowa National Park and Biosphere Reserve, Assam, India, Indian Birds, 2(4), 2006, pp. 95-105.
  • A Choudhury
A. Choudhury, Mammals, birds and reptiles of Dibru-Saikhowa Sanctuary, Assam, India, Oryx International Journal of Conservation, 32(3), 1998, pp.192-200.
Surveys of the White-winged Duck and the Bengal Florican in Tinsukia, District and Adjacent Areas of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, The Rhino Foundation for nature in North East India
  • A Choudhury
A. Choudhury, Surveys of the White-winged Duck and the Bengal Florican in Tinsukia, District and Adjacent Areas of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, The Rhino Foundation for nature in North East India, Guwahati, 1996.