Article

QUANTUM GRAVITY AND TIME OBSERVABLE

August 2016

August 2016

Authors:

Hussainsha Syed

Dell Inc.

The principal objective of this paper is finding a way to discover Time observable, how to quantize gravity, and how to relate Time with Physics in a theoretical manner. This paper discusses about Time with the support of General Theory of Relativity and Special Theory of Relativity. In this theory I relate Time with Energy. The result of this paper gives Equivalence of Time and Energy with respect to Future, Time – like interval is probabilistic, space emerges as a discrete nature of gravity, Bosons also obey Pauli Exclusion Principle, and Time runs slow at greater Temperature.

Quantum gravity y

Data

August 2016

Hussainsha Syed

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Chapter

Basic Physical Ideas of Quantum Radioelectronics

April 2014

In this and follow-up chapters we will describe the physical principles for the development of devices, in which an element that determines their properties is an ensemble of micro-particles (nuclei, atoms, molecules, and so on) in special state. In the classical radioelectronics, there are numerous devices that use the so-called narrow-band elements.

Article

A note on decomposition numbers for general linear groups and symmetric groups

January 1985 · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Stephen Donkin

In [5] James proved theorems on the decomposition numbers, for the general linear groups and symmetric groups, involving the removal of the first row or column from partitions. In [1] we gave different proofs of these theorems based on a result valid for the decomposition numbers of any reductive group. (I am grateful to J. C. Jantzen for pointing out that the Theorem in [1] may also be derived ... [Show full abstract] from the universal Chevalley group case, which follows from the proof of 1 ·18 Satz of [6] – the analogue of equation (1) of the proof being obtained by means of the natural isometry (with respect to contra-variant forms) between a certain sum of weight spaces of a Weyl module V(λ) of highest weight λ and the Weyl module corresponding to λ for the Chevalley group determined by the subset of the base involved.) However, we have recently noticed that this result for reductive groups, even when specialized to the case of GLn, gives a substantial generalization of James's Theorems. This generalization, which we give here, is an expression for the decomposition number [λ: μ] for a pair of partitions λ, μ whose diagrams can be simultaneously cut by a horizontal (or vertical) line so as to leave the same number of nodes above the line (or to the left of the line for a vertical cut) in both cases. Cutting between the first and second rows gives James's principal of row removal ([5], theorem 1) and cutting between the first and second column gives his principle of column removal ([5], theorem 2). Another special case of our horizontal result, involving the removal of bottom rows of a pair of partitions, is stated in [7], Satz 8.(Received June 11 1984)

Article

The neutrino charge radius as a physical observable

March 2004 · Nuclear Physics B

We present a method which allows, at least in principle, the direct extraction of the gauge-invariant and process-independent neutrino charge radius (NCR) from experiments. Under special kinematic conditions, the judicious combination of neutrino and anti-neutrino forward differential cross-sections allows the exclusion of all target-dependent contributions, such as gauge-independent box-graphs, ... [Show full abstract] not related to the NCR. We show that the remaining contributions contain universal, renormalization group invariant combinations, such as the electroweak effective charge and the running mixing angle, which must be also separated out. By considering the appropriate number of independent experiments we show that one may systematically eliminate these universal terms, and finally express the NCR entirely in terms of physical cross-sections. Even though the kinematic conditions and the required precision may render the proposed experiments unfeasible, at the conceptual level the analysis presented here allows for the promotion of the NCR into a genuine physical observable.

Article

THEORY OF TIME: TIME IS ENERGY AND THE FUTURE

August 2016

Hussainsha Syed

The principal objective of this paper is finding a way to discover Future and how to relate Time with Physics in a theoretical manner. This paper discusses about Time with the support of General Theory of Relativity and Special Theory of Relativity. In this theory I relate Time with Energy and I discover a way to remember future like as we remember past. The result of this paper gives Equivalence ... [Show full abstract] of Time and Energy with respect to Future and Time runs slow at greater Temperature.

Article

Full-text available

Dynamics of indistinguishable free particles driven by a quantum bath

April 2019 · Physical Review A

The time evolution of correlations for two indistinguishable free particles, in a one-dimensional lattice interacting with a quantum bath, is studied in the Born-Markov approximation. The analytical solution for the density matrix is obtained, for bosons and fermions, in the second quantization formalism. The time evolution of the negativity of indistinguishable particles is analyzed for quantum ... [Show full abstract] mixed states. Quantum correlations heavily depend on the selected bipartition; in return, a small difference between the statistics of the particles is noted, due to the Pauli exclusion principle. In the presence of dissipation, the negativity (a nonclassical correlation) shows a time-oscillatory behavior for a particular geometrical bipartition. The total probability of finding one particle in each subsystem is also calculated and shows consistent behavior.

Article

THEORY OF TIME: TIME IS ENERGY AND THE FUTURE

August 2016

Hussainsha Syed

The principal objective of this paper is finding a way to discover Future and how to relate Time with Physics in a theoretical manner. This paper discusses about Time with the support of General Theory of Relativity and Special Theory of Relativity. In this theory I relate Time with Energy and I discover a way to remember future like as we remember past. The result of this paper gives Equivalence ... [Show full abstract] of Time and Energy with respect to Future and Time runs slow at greater Temperature.

Article

Bounds on neutrino burst intensity imposed by the exclusion principle and causality

December 1974 · The Astrophysical Journal

Article

Full-text available

Big-Bounce cosmology in the presence of Immirzi field

July 2016 · Physical Review D

The Immirzi parameter is promoted to be a scalar field and the Hamiltonian analysis of the corresponding dynamical system is performed in the presence of gravity. We identified some SU(2) connections, generalizing Ashtekar-Barbero variables, and we rewrite the constraints in terms of them, setting the classical formulation suitable for loop quantization. Then, we consider the reduced system ... [Show full abstract] obtained when restricting to a flat isotropic cosmological model. By mimicking loop quantization via an effective semiclassical treatment, we outline how quantum effects are able to tame the initial singularity both in synchronous time and when the Immirzi field is taken as a relational time.

Article

Full-text available

Oscillations of neutrino velocity

October 2012 · Journal of High Energy Physics

In this paper, we consider the problem of quantum measurement of neutrino velocity. We show, that the well known neutrino flavor oscillations are always accompanied by the oscillations of neutrino velocity. In particular, the velocity of a freely moving neutrino is demonstrated to periodically exceed the speed of light. Unfortunately, the superluminal effect turns out to be too small to be ... [Show full abstract] experimentally detected. It is also shown that neutrino velocity significantly depends on the energy, size and shape of the neutrino wave packet. Owing to the big experimental error of the recent experiments, these dependences remained unnoticeable. Finally, we have shown that the recent claims that superluminal neutrinos should loose energy during their flight is not true. Instead, our formula suggests the approximate conservation of energy along neutrino trajectory. All these results have been obtained without violation of special theory of relativity.

Chapter

The Special Theory of Relativity

January 2007

In this chapter we shall give a short introduction to the fundamental principles of the special theory of relativity, and deduce some of the consequences of the theory.

Article

On the quantization of constrained generalized dynamics

July 1988 · Journal of Mathematical Physics

A special class of degenerate second‐order Lagrangians, those that differ from a nondegenerate first‐order Lagrangian by a total time derivative (or a four‐divergence) of a function of both the coordinates and velocities, is studied in detail. Using Dirac’s theory of constrained systems, it is shown that the canonical quantization starting from the second‐order Lagrangian leads to the same ... [Show full abstract] physical results as those obtained from the nondegenerate first‐order Lagrangian. Then some incorrect results and misleading arguments encountered in the literature on the subject are clarified.

Chapter

The General Theory of Relativity

January 1984

Stanley Goldberg

THE WORD “SPECIAL” IN “SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY” means that the theory is restricted to those frames of reference for which the law of inertia holds, that is, inertial frames of reference.* Einstein sometimes referred to them as Galilean frames of reference. At first glance, it does not seem reasonable to expect that the principle of relativity can be extended to non-inertial frames. The ... [Show full abstract] reasons are fairly obvious. The principle of relativity that we have been using states that the laws of physics have the same form in all frames of reference to which the principle applies. In other words there should be no way to determine by an experiment which of two frames of reference is in motion relative to the other.