Content uploaded by Hamid Mohammadi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hamid Mohammadi on Jan 13, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Andabjadid et al. Page 20
RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS
Effects of corm size and plant density on Saffron (
Crocus sativus
L.) yield
and its components
Samira Sameh Andabjadid1*, Bahman Pasban Eslam2, Amir Reza Sadeghi Bakhtavari1,
Hamid Mohammadi1
1Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Azerbaijan
Shahid Madani, Tabriz, Iran
2 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of East Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran
Key words: corm size, plant density, saffron, stigma yield.
Article published on March 03, 2015
Abstract
In order to investigate the saffron yield and its components at different levels of corm size and plant density, an
experiment was conducted at East Azerbaijan Agricultural and Natural resources Research Center, as a factorial
based on randomized complete block design with three replications for two years (2012-2013). First year was
considered for better plant establishment. The factors consist of corm sizes based on the corm diameter in two
levels (A1=2-4 cm and A2=4-6 cm), planting rows space in three levels (B1=10, B2=20 and B3=30 cm) and corm
space within the row in two levels (C1=7 and C2=14 cm). Traits including plant emergence percentage, number of
plants and flowers per unit area, length of rod, length of stigma, fresh and dry weight of flowers, fresh and dry
weight of stigmas, total stigma yield, the onset of flowering and flowering period were evaluated on the plants.
Results showed that all above mentioned traits except length of rod were significantly affected by corm size.
Bigger corms showed more emergence percentage and flower fresh weight. Number of plants was significantly
affected by the interaction which three factors so that maximum number of plants per unit area was observed at
treatment of bigger corms with 10 (cm) corms spacing between rows and 7 (cm) corms spacing within rows. 7
(cm) corms spacing on the row created maximum flower number per unit area. Length of stigma, dry weight of
flower, fresh and dry weight of stigma were significantly affected by the interaction between corm size with corms
spacing within row so that bigger corms with less spacing were superior. Maximum stigma yield was obtained
from the bigger corms in 7 (cm) corm space on the row and 10 (cm) corm space between rows. Flowering of
bigger corms began sooner and their flowering period was more than others.
*Corresponding Author: Samira Sameh Andabjadid Samehs07@yahoo.com
International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR)
ISSN: 2223-7054 (Print) 2225-3610 (Online)
http://www.innspub.net
Vol. 6, No. 3, p. 20-26, 2015
Andabjadid et al. Page 21
Introduction
Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is the most expensive
plant spice in the world. The economic portion of this
plant is the dried stigma of flowers. That is as
subtropical plant. In traditional medicine, saffron was
considered as an excellent drug for stomach ailments
and an antispasmodic that helps digestion and
increases appetite. It is also recommended as an
emmenagogue and aphrodisiac herb (Rios et al.,
1996). Saffron is a cold tolerant plant but temperate
climate is better for its growth (Behnia, 1996). This
plant is mainly produced in Iran (Schmidt et al.,
2007). The saffron cultivation areas have increased
from 10000 (ha) in 1987 to 57000 (ha) in 2008 and
its production rate at the same time, increased from
40 ton to 240 ton in Iran at the past two decades
(Saiedi-rad and Mokhtarian, 2011). Saffron is
reproduced by corms because it is sterile (Vurdu et
al., 2004). Therefore selection of productive corms is
an important factor in saffron production.
Studies have shown that corm size has a positive
effect on saffron flowering (De-mastro and Ruta,
1993). The results of a research conducted in India
showed that by increasing the diameter of corms, the
number of flowers and leaves increased and corms
with more than 3 (cm) diameter and 10 gram weight
were more productive (Pandy and Srivastava, 1979).
Bigger corms increase yield in following years via
production of bigger daughter corms (Sadeghi, 1994).
Omidbaigi et al., (2000) reported the maximum
number of flowers and daughter corms, obtained
from corms with 11 gram weights. Also they stated
that some of big corms are not able to initiate to
flower due to injury in corms during transport and
planting, will lead to yield decrease. The mother corm
has a limited life span and after maximum flowering,
aging will be started, therefore this hypothesis should
be rejected that by increasing corm, the number of
flowers will be increased without limitation. The
results of some research showed a positive correlation
between the number of flowers and leaves, so this is
not true that big corms are weak for flowering due to
the high vegetative growth (Mashayekhi and Latifi,
1998). Corm density is different due to planting
method (Mollafilabi, 2004). Suitable planting density
in saffron will increase the period of exploitation
(Abrishami, 1997). Behdad (2001) studied plant
density in both single and double corms and reported
that single corm cultivation had lower performance.
Behnia and Mokhtarian (2010) stated that 10 corms
with 30 (cm) spacing between rows had maximum
yield. The planting of saffron at higher densities led to
increase in the yield during first three years of
planting (Kochaki et al., 2012). This study was
conducted for determination of suitable planting
density and corm size of saffron to achieve maximum
stigma yield.
Material and methods
Site description and experimental design
This experiment was conducted at East Azerbaijan
Agricultural and Natural resources Research Center,
as a factorial based on randomized complete block
design with three replications for two years (2012-
2013). Since establishment is important for bulbous
plants, first year was considered for better plant
establishment. Corms were prepared from Bonab
village located in Marand in East Azerbaijan. Soil
texture was silty loam with pH= 7.8 and EC= 2/18
dSm-1. In each plot three rows were planted.
Measurement of traits
After removing marginal effects in each plot, initially,
flowers were counted and then10 flowers were taken
as sample. Length of rod and stigma were measured
and then fresh weight of flower and stigma was
determined. Samples were placed in an oven with 72
0C for 24 hours and then dry weight were measured.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the data was performed with
MSTAT-C software. Duncan multiple range test was
applied to compare means of each trait at 5%
probability.
Results and discussion
Emergence percentage
Emergence percentage was significantly affected by
corm size (p≤ 0.01) (Table 1). Corms with 4 to 6 (cm)
Andabjadid et al. Page 22
diameter were best (151.126 percentage) (Table 2).
Pandy and Srivastava (1979) reported in saffron,
diameter of corms is important for emergence
percentage and resultant flowering percentage. Sadeghi
(2010) showed emergence percentage in corms with
diameter 8 to 10 (cm) was more than medium and
small corms. Buds that appears at the right time will
produce strong plants and more flowers.
Table 1. Analysis of variance of selected parameters of Saffron by corm size and plant density treatments.
Flowering
period
Time
interval
from first
irrigation
tofirst
flowering
Total
yield of
stigma
Dry
weight
of
stigma
Fresh
weight
of
stigma
Dry
weight of
flower
Fresh
weight of
flowers
Length
of
stigma
Length
of rod
Number
of
flowers
per unit
area
Number of
plants per
unit area
Emergence
percentage
df
S.O.V
55.361
26.861
1368.130
5.560
58.588
599.011
22413.086
114.142
72.442
817.583
533.083
881.002
2
Block
306.250**
44.444**
9692.402**
15.867**
194.603**
1250.801**
39846.812**
303.921**
7.471ns
7000.111**
22550.028**
33838.831**
1
A
1.694ns
1.194ns
244.717ns
0.008ns
1.541ns
3.086ns
933.110ns
8.130ns
3.287ns
234.750ns
462.333*
503.251ns
2
B
6.083ns
2.694ns
67.336ns
0.188ns
2.123ns
7.119ns
2128.830ns
4.697ns
43.632ns
79.528ns
483.444*
446.991ns
2
A×B
46.694ns
11.111ns
1745.847**
4.767**
77.734*
439.601*
13615.002ns
170.738*
31.360ns
1320.111**
42918.028**
219.632ns
1
C
1.361ns
9ns
103.022ns
6.167**
73.103*
590.490**
13888.622ns
136.890*
80.401ns
75.111ns
2826.694**
18.662ns
1
A×C
56.028ns
11.861ns
467.509*
0.714ns
22.934ns
39.260ns
1667.764ns
15.935ns
12.202ns
321.861ns
257.444ns
151.987ns
2
B×C
8.528ns
7.583ns
251.606ns
0.088ns
1.493ns
7.831ns
340.792ns
12.891ns
4.312ns
154.194ns
445.444*
382.006ns
2
A×B×C
15.846
3.770
134.468
0.423
13.369
62.790
3748.587
22.745
51.395
102.311
127.841
166.894
22
Eror
31.50
4.63
29.10
15.88
19.77
18.64
20.42
17.99
20.67
28.90
11.51
10.72
CV (%)
A: Corm size, B: Corms spacing between rows, C: Corms spacing within rows.
Ns=Non significant; * and ** = Significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.
Table 2. Mean comparisons for different traits of Saffron under different corm size treatments.
Corm
size
(cm)
Emergence
percentage
Number of
flower per
unit area
Fresh
weight of
flower
(mg/m2)
Total
yield of
stigma
(mg/m2)
Time interval
from first
irrigation to first
flowering (day)
Flowering
period
(day)
2-4
89.808
12.055
266.611
13.25
43.055
9.722
4-6
151.126
39.944
333.15
46.066
40.833
15.55
Number of plants per unit area
Number of plants per unit area was affected the
interactions among all three factors significantly (p≤
0.05) (Table 1). Also maximum numbers of plants per
unit area (191.7 plants per unit area) was observed at
treatment of bigger corms with 10 (cm) corms spacing
between rows and 7 (cm) corms spacing within rows
(Fig. 1).
Number of flower per unit area
Effect of corm size and corm spacing within rows on
number of flowers per unit area were significant (p≤
0.01) (Table 1). Bigger corms (39.944 flowers per unit
area) were better than small corms (12.055 flowers
per unit area) (Table 2). De-mastro and Ruta (1993),
Sadeghi (1994) and Ramazani (2000) mentioned that
big corms produces more flower. Small corms are not
able to produce flower from physiological aspect and
in order to produce economically, three or four years
is require for plant establishment (Mashayekhi and
Latifi, 1998). Since big corms have more food, are
able to produce bigger daughter corms. On the other
side, relationship between rate of leaf photosynthesis
and mother corm size has shown larger leaf area in
the plant collected from the bigger corms. It causes
high accumulation of reserves in alternate corms.
Finally this leads to production more flowers and
higher stigma yield at the following years. It should be
remembered that development of alternative corms
continues to a certain extent but it cannot goes
beyond sink capacity (Renau-Morata et al., 2012). So
the correct choice of corms can rise the saffron yield
for several years.
Mean comparison of number of flowers per unit area
at different levels of corm spacing within rows
showed that 7 (cm) corm spacing with 32.055 flowers
against 14 (cm) space with 19.944 flowers, created
maximum number of flowers per unit area.
Increasing density of saffron corms has a positive
Andabjadid et al. Page 23
effect on the number of flowers and stigma yield
(Gresta et al., 2009). Rostami and Mohammadi
(2013) reported that by increasing corm density,
flowers per unit area was enhanced linearly.
Fig. 1. Means comparison of interaction effects of
corm size (A) × corm space between row (B) × corm
space within row (C) on number of plants per unit
area.
The means with same letters are not significantly
different at p ≤ 0.05. (A1= 2-4, A2= 4-6 cm), (B1=10,
B2=20, B3=30 cm), (C1=7, C2= 14 cm).
Length of rod
Effect of corm size and plant density on rod length
were insignificant (Table 1). Sadeghi (2010) stated
that effect of corm size on length of rod was
significant just from the second year of planting and
bigger corms had longer rods.
Length of stigma
Length of stigma was significantly affected by
interaction between corm size and corm spacing
within rows (p≤ 0.05) (Table 1). Flowers obtained
from small corms that were planted with 14 (cm)
space on rows, had the shortest stigmas (Table 3). It
seems that when cultivated corms are smaller, longer
stigma can be obtained with consideration of a higher
density so that the effect of low density can be
compensated by planting big corms. Rostami and
Mohammadi (2013) showed that different planting
densities have a significant impact on length of
stigma. They mentioned that the length of stigma was
reduced by increasing plant density due to
competition among saffron plants. In the present
study, plants with higher density produced longer
stigma.
Table 3. Mean comparisons traits of Saffron at
different levels of corm size and corm space within
row.
Treatment
Length
of
stigma
(cm)
Dry
weight
of
flower
(mg)
Fresh
weight
of
stigma
(mg)
Dry
weight
of
stigma
(mg)
A1C1
27.7 a
44.17 a
19.07 a
4.211 a
A1C2
19.48 b
29.08 b
13.28 b
2.656 b
A2C1
29.64 a
47.86 a
20.87 a
4.711 a
A2C2
29.19 a
48.97 a
20.78 a
4.811 a
The means with same letters in each column are not
significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. (A: diameter of
corms, A1= 2-4, A2= 4-6 cm and C:corm space within
row, C1=7, C2= 14 cm)
Fresh and dry weight of flower
According to the results just the effect of corm size
was significant on fresh weight of flower (p≤ 0.01)
(Table 1). Flowers obtained from corms with 4 to 6
(cm) in diameter showed more fresh weight (Table 2).
Effect of corm size and corm spacing within rows
were significant on the dry weight of flower (p≤ 0.01)
(Table 1). Based on the mean comparison table of
interaction corm size and corm spacing within rows,
smaller corms with lower density have less dry weight
(Table 3).
Fresh and dry weight of stigma
Factors of corm size and corm spacing within rows
had a significant effect on fresh and dry weight of
stigma, whereas corm spacing between rows has no
significant effect on this variable (Table 1). Mean
comparison table of interaction corm size and corm
spacing within rows demonstrated stigmas of flower
that obtained from small corms with less density had
less fresh and dry weight (Table 3). Gresta et al.,
(2009) and also Rostami and Mohammadi (2013)
reported that there is a negative relationship between
corm density and dry weight of stigma that is
inconsistent with the present study. De Juan et al.,
(2009) observed that dry weight of stigma was
decreased by increasing corm density. Since dry
weight of stigma has effect on total yield undeniably,
Andabjadid et al. Page 24
they believed that optimal density of corms depends
on the yield comparison unit in such a way that if
yield is expressed in terms of corm weight, less corm
density will be more appropriate and if it is expressed
based on area planted, more corm density will be
better.
Total yield
The results showed total stigma yield affected by corm
size and corm spacing within rows (p≤ 0.01) (Table1).
Corms with 4 to 6 (cm) in diameter, had more yield
than others (Table 2). In the bigger corms, cell
division and leaves growth occurs earlier, and their
growing period is longer than others. This ability will
able those corms to grow better and produce heavier
corms that support high yield for following year
(Molina et al., 2005). Interaction of corm spacing
within and between rows had significant effect on the
total yield (p≤ 0.05) (Table 1). When corms spacing
between rows 10 (cm) and their spacing within rows
were 7 (cm), maximum yield will be attained (Fig. 2).
It seems that increasing corms density and reducing
corms distances between and within rows, cause
enhancement in yield. Behnia (2008) and Kochaki et
al., (2012) concluded that yield will be increased
significantly by increasing plant density. Galavand
and Abdollahian-Noghani (1994) reported that
planting pattern of corms in 30 (cm) distance
between lines and 10 (cm) space within rows had
more performance. Alavi-Shahri et al., (1994) stated
that by increasing corm density, saffron yield
increased. They believed that 20 (cm) corm space
between rows and 10 (cm) within rows were
appropriate in terms of performance increase. Gainst
Yau and Nimah (2004) indicated that more planting
distances (20×20) is superior than lesser distances
(10×10 and 10×20). Results of the present study is in
conflict with results of Mohammad-Abadi et al.,
(2007) who said planting density had no significant
effect on the saffron yield. Probably interaction of
planting density with numerous factors such as
planting depth and method can contain different
effects and therefore different results can be
attributed to these cases.
Fig. 2. Means comparison of interaction effects of
corm space between row (B) × corm space within row
(C) on total yield of stigma.
The means with same letters are not significantly
different at p ≤ 0.05. (B1=10, B2=20, B3=30 cm),
(C1=7, C2= 14 cm).
The onset of flowering and flowering period
In order to investigate the effect of studied factors on
onset of flowering, date of first irrigation demand
were considered as prominent ones. Results indicated
that corm size had significant effect on the onset of
flowering and flowering period (p≤ 0.01) (Table 1).
The bigger corms, the earlier flowering time is to
happen (Table 2), but since flowering of big corms
started just three days earlier, this issue was not
important. Mashayekhi and Latifi (1998) indicated
that flowering time had not clear correlation with
weight of corms.
Flowering period of corms with a 4 to 6 (cm) in
diameter was more than smaller corms (Table 2).
Previous studies showed that bigger corms have
longer flowering period than smaller once (Cavusoglu
and IclalErkel, 2005). Probably the reason can be low
physiological power in smaller corms which will
produces lower flowers (Renau-Morata et al. 2012),
Therefore big corms owing to emergence of flowers
non-simultaneously produce more flowers in the
longer time. Rostami and Mohammadi (2013) showed
that higher plant density not only causes earlier
flowering but also reduces flowering period. They
explained reason for this facilitate in exit of flower
tube due to high density. This subject is noted in
saffron production at western agronomic lands of
Iran, where rainfall starts earlier.
Andabjadid et al. Page 25
Conclusion
Different sizes of corms and plant density affect
stigma yield and its components, so that corms with a
greater diameter due to more food reserves, cause
more emergence percentage which increases number
of plants and flowers per unit area and its follow
yield. On the other side, larger corms produce big
flowers which have stigma with more length and
weight, ultimately increased total yield of saffron. Big
corms have higher physiological ability to start
flowering earlier. As a result higher number of flowers
and their non-concurrency in emergence, flowering
period is longer in big corms.
Planting the corms of saffron with high density
increases its total yield that arises from increase in
number of plant and flower. In this survey high corm
density, led to bigger flowers with more weight of
stigma. Also total yield is more affected by number of
flowers than stigma weight.
The population of daughter corms rises over time.
Higher densities can cause an increase in competition
for current sources in the long time. It can also be
effective on saffron yield at following years. Result of
high density is early exploitation from saffron farms,
so achieving the highest yield occurs at shorter time
range.
References
Abrishami MH. 1997. Saffron of Iran. Toss
publications, p. 320.
Alavi-Shahri J, Mohajeri H, Falaki MA. 1994.
Effect of plant density on saffron yield. Proceedings of
the Second Conference of saffron and Medical Plants
Cultivation, Gonbad, Iran 13-20.
Behdad M. 2001. Survey of plant density and
cultivation methods to two forms, single and double
corms, in saffron. The final report of the research
project, Ministry of Agriculture, Seed and plant
improvement institute, 12-20.
Behnia M. 2008. Effect of planting methods and corm
density in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) yield in Damavand
region. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 79, 101-108.
Behnia MR, Mokhtari M. 2010. Effect of planting
methods and corm density in saffron yield. Acta
Horticulturae, 850, 131-136.
Behnia MR. 1996. Saffron: Botany, Cultivation and
Production. University of Tehran Press, Iran, P. 285.
Cavusoglu A, IclalErkel E. 2005. The effect of
different planting areas and corm size on yield and
harvest period of saffron in Kocaeli province.
University of Akdeniz, Turkey 2, 179-184.
De Juan A, Lopez-Corcholes H, Munoz RM,
Picornell MR. 2009. Yield and yield components of
saffron under different cropping systems. Industrial
Crops and Products 30, 212-219.
De- maestro G, Ruta C. 1993. Relation between
corm size and saffron flowering. Acta Horticultura
344, 512-517.
Ghalavand A, Abdollahian-Noghani M. 1994.
Study ecological adaption and effect of plant density
and planting method on yield of native saffron bulks
of Iran. Proceedings of the Second Conference of
Saffron and Medical Plants Cultivation, Gonbad, Iran
33-39.
Gresta F, Avola G, Lombardo GM, Siracusa L,
Ruberto G. 2009. Analysis of flowering, stigmas
yield and qualitative traits of saffron (Crocus sativus
L.) as affected by environmental conditions. Scientia
Horticultura 119, 320-324.
Kochaki A, Tabrizi L, Jahani M, Mohammad-
Abadi AA. 2012. Evaluation of high density of corm
and three planting methods on agronomic
characteristics of saffron and corms behavior. Iranian
Journal of Horticultural Science 4, 391-397.
Andabjadid et al. Page 26
Mashayekhi K, Latifi N. 1998. Effect of corm
weight on saffron flowering. Iranian Journal of
Agricultural Sciences 1, 97-105.
Mohamad-Abadi AA, Rezvani-Moghaddam P,
Sabori A. 2007. Effect of plant distance on flower
yield and qualitative and quantitative characteristics
of forage production of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in
Mashhad conditions. Acta Horticulturae 739, 151-
153.
Molina RV, Valero M, Navarro Y, Garcia-Luice
A, Guardiola JL. 2005. Low temperature storage of
corms extends the flowering season of saffron (Crocus
sativus L.). The Journal of Horticultural Science and
Biotechnology 80, 319-326.
Mollafilabi A. 2004. Production and modern
agronomic of saffron. Scientific and Industrial
Research Organization of Khorasan, Mashhad, Iran
22-35.
Omidbaigi R, Betti G, Sadeghi B, Ramezani A.
2002. Influence of the bulb weight on the productivity
of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) results of a cultivation
study in Khorasan (Iran). Journal of Medicinal and
Spice Plant 7, 38-40.
Pandy DP, Srivastava RP. 1979. A note on the
effect of the size of corms on the sprouting and
flowering of saffron. Progressive Horticulture 23, 89-
92.
Ramazani A. 2000. Effect of corm weight on saffron
yield in the region of Nishabur. M.Sc. thesis,
University of Tarbiat Modarres, Iran p. 134.
Renau-Morata B, Nebauer SG, Sanchez M,
Molina RV. 2012. Effect of corm size, water stress
and cultivation conditions on photosynthesis and
biomass partitioning during the vegetative growth of
saffron. Industrial Crops and Products 39, 40-46.
Rios JL, Recio MC, Giner RM, Manez S. 1996.
An update review of saffron and its active
constituents. Phytother Res 10, 93-189.
Rostami M, Mohammadi H. 2013. Effect of
planting date and corm density on growth and yield of
saffron in climate of Malayer. Ecology of Agriculture.
1, 27-38.
Sadeghi AR. 2010. Effects of different Saffron
(Crocus sativus L.) bulb sizes and plant density on the
yield and factors affecting yield. Ph.D thesis,
University of Ankara, Turkey, p. 79.
Sadeghi B. 1994. Effect of corm weight on saffron
flowering. Scientific and Industrial Research
Organization of Khorasan, Mashhad, Iran,18-26.
Saiedi-rad MH, Mokhtarian A. 2011. The
scientific principles of planting of saffron.
Agricultural Extension and Education Press, p. 108.
Schmidt M, Betti G, Hensel A. 2007. Saffron in
phytotherapy: pharmacology and clinical uses.
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 157, 13 - 14.
Vurdu H, Guney K, Cicek F. 2004. Biology of Crocus
olivieri sub spolivieri. Acta Horticultural 650, 71-85.
Yau SK, Nimah M. 2004. Spacing effects on corm
and flower production of saffron. Lebanes Science
Journal 5, 13-20.