A large-scale, two-dimensional, muticomponent, multiphase, compositional simulator for micellar/polymer flooding has been developed and applied. It can be used to calculate the areal sweep with any well pattern and any irregular reservoir boundary. This model involves both streamline and finite-difference techniques. Time invarient streamlines without transverse dispersion are assumed. The change
... [Show full abstract] in the flow rates into each streamline is accounted for as a function of mobility ratio.
Computation results show that a line drive pattern produces a greater tertiary oil recovery than a 5-spot under the same pressure drop. However, the injection time of the line drive is two-to-three times larger. On the other hand, the oil recoveries of a 5-spot and a 9-spot are very close, but the 9-spot requires a longer project life. The fractional oil recovery for a 5-spot is found to decrease as a function of increasing well spacing. It is also observed that the orientation of an anisotropic reservoir with a 5-spot pattern plays a very important role in the micellar/polymer process. The injection time for a 5-spot may be reduced by a factor of one-half to one-third if the polymer solution is shear thinning. The proper control of the production rate of a single or isolated 5-spot pattern can greatly increase tertiary oil recovery.
In order to demonstrate that this model is capable of handling much larger field problems, a large-scale simulation of the north lease of the El Dorado micellar/polymer pilot test was made. The simulated final oil recovery and the production histories of each producer are illustrated.