Article

La reseña bibliográfica y la inestabilidad textual en “Examen de la obra de Herbert Quain” (1941), de Jorge Luis Borges

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Borges produced a kind of oscillatory writing that conceived both an innovative body of literature and a reader-accomplice that allowed him to sketch a new level of aesthetic experience. In his short story “Examen de la obra de Herbert Quain,” a hypothetical author attempts to build a systematic structure which, for Borges, was both potential,—in the sense that it generated non-existent texts—and potentializing, as it stretched his writing to its limits. The systematic structure created by Quain is a bibliographic and meticulous critical review of texts engendered by other texts. This article proposes two main paths of interpretation of Borges’s “Examen”: as a piece of potential literature (Oulipo), and as a destabilizing text. Quain relies on conventional standards of critical reviews and on techniques from the discipline of bibliography. These parameters allow him to build his own set of constraints, to then play against these constraints, and to approach literature as an object of study in order to then destabilize it.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.