ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract and Figures

Benno Ejnisman,1 Gisele Barbosa,1 Carlos V Andreoli,1 A de Castro Pochini,1 Thiago Lobo,2 Rodrigo Zogaib,2 Moises Cohen,1 Mario Bizzini,3 Jiri Dvorak3 1Department of Orthopaedics, Federal University of São Paulo, 2Sports Medicine Department, Santos FC, São Paulo, Brazil; 3FIFA-Medical Assessment and Research Centre, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland Abstract: In the last years, shoulder injuries have represented an increasing health problem in soccer players. The goalkeepers are more exposed to shoulder disorders than other field players. Injury prevention exercises for upper limbs were cited in few studies involving throwing athletes, but we know that goalkeepers need a specific program. The purpose of this study is to describe the development of an adapted Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+ program, namely the FIFA 11+ shoulder, which targets the prevention of shoulder injuries in soccer goalkeepers. The FIFA 11+ shoulder program is structured into three parts: general warming-up exercises, exercises to improve strength and balance of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger muscles, and advanced exercises for core stability and muscle control. The exercises were selected based on recommendations from studies demonstrating high electromyographic activity. Keywords: goalkeeper, shoulder, injury prevention, prevention program
Content may be subject to copyright.
© 2016 Ejnisman et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/
terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the
work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For
permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Shoulder injuries in soccer goalkeepers: review
and development of a FIFA 11+ shoulder injury
prevention program
Benno Ejnisman1
Gisele Barbosa1
Carlos V Andreoli1
A de Castro Pochini1
Thiago Lobo2
Rodrigo Zogaib2
Moises Cohen1
Mario Bizzini3
Jiri Dvorak3
1Department of Orthopaedics,
Federal University of São Paulo,
2Sports Medicine Department, Santos
FC, São Paulo, Brazil; 3FIFA-Medical
Assessment and Research Centre,
Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
Correspondence: Benno Ejnisman
Department of Orthopaedics, Federal
University of São Paulo, Rua Estado de
Israel 636, Cep 04022-002, São Paulo, SP,
Brazil
Email bennoale@uol.com.br
Abstract: In the last years, shoulder injuries have represented an increasing health problem in
soccer players. The goalkeepers are more exposed to shoulder disorders than other field players.
Injury prevention exercises for upper limbs were cited in few studies involving throwing athletes,
but we know that goalkeepers need a specific program. The purpose of this study is to describe
the development of an adapted Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+
program, namely the FIFA 11+ shoulder, which targets the prevention of shoulder injuries in
soccer goalkeepers. The FIFA 11+ shoulder program is structured into three parts: general
warming-up exercises, exercises to improve strength and balance of the shoulder, elbow, wrist,
and finger muscles, and advanced exercises for core stability and muscle control. The exercises
were selected based on recommendations from studies demonstrating high electromyographic
activity.
Keywords: goalkeeper, shoulder, injury prevention, prevention program
Introduction
Soccer is the most popular sport worldwide, and participation in this sport can be
associated with injuries.1 On average, an elite soccer player suffers from 1.5 to 7.6
injuries each 1,000 hours of training and 12 to 35 injuries each 1,000 hours of match.2,3
Kirkendall and Dvorak4 reported that the most common injured site was the lower limb
(67.7%), followed by the upper limb (13.4%).
In the last years, shoulder injuries have represented an increasing health problem
in soccer players.5 The modern soccer has been characterized by high speed, pressing,
and marking.5 Many researchers have reported that goalkeepers are more exposed to
upper limb lesion than other field soccer players.6,7
The percentage of shoulder damage that occurred during Athens 2004 and EURO
2004 was 3.8% and 4.4%, respectively.8 Junge et al9 reported shoulder injuries between
2% and 13% during a 4-year period (from 1998 to 2001) of international tournaments.
The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) collected data during
Japan/Korea World Cup (2002) and Germany World Cup (2006) and reported higher
percentages of upper extremity injury (4.6% and 8.2%, respectively).
A third of shoulder injuries (28%) sustained by professional soccer players are
severe because of which participation in training and games is stopped for $28 days.10
In a study of the UEFA European Championships, a total of 34 severe injuries were
recorded, two of which were shoulder dislocation.11 Hart and Funk12 reported that a
previous shoulder injury is a significant risk factor of more or repeated injuries than
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2016:7 75–80
Dovepress
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
REVIEW
open access to scientific and medical research
Open Access Full Text Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S97917
75
Number of times this article has been viewed
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
8 August 2016
other soccer injuries in general. A majority of serious soccer
shoulder injuries affect the glenoid labrum (84%), and a
smaller number are labral injuries with associated rotator
cuff involvement (8%). A minority (8%) are isolated rotator
cuff injuries.
Prevention of soccer injuries: what
about the upper extremity?
Since the launch of FIFA 11+, key publications have
confirmed the preventive effects of the program and have
evaluated its performance-improving effects in female as
well as male amateur soccer players.13 Considerable reduc-
tions in the number of injured players, ranging between
30% and 70%, have been observed among the teams that
implemented the FIFA 11+ program.14 This program has been
mainly developed to prevent lower limb injuries – there is
no specific program in the current literature to prevent upper
limb lesions in soccer players.
Wilk et al15 developed the Advanced Throwers Ten Exer-
cise Program. This program consists of exercises that restore
muscle balance and symmetry in the overhead throwing ath-
lete, which is necessary for the symptom-free return to sports
after lesion. Injury prevention exercises for upper limbs are
cited in few studies involving throwing athletes,16,17 but we
know that soccer goalkeepers need a specific program.
McCall et al18 cited that the “five” most common injury
risk-screening tests used by national soccer teams were
the evaluation of flexibility (dynamic and static), physical
fitness, joint mobility, balance/proprioception, and muscle
endurance and peak strength. In the same study, the authors
reported the exercise-based injury prevention strategies that
were not specific for upper or lower limb injuries. The key
preventive exercises used by national teams were similar to
those reported for premier league clubs, albeit in a slightly
different order of importance.18 For example, core, balance/
proprioception, and eccentric exercises also feature in the
“Top five” of national teams’ exercises. At the time of this
review, there was no direct scientific evidence that core
exercises can reduce injury risk in top-level soccer players,
although evidence from other sports suggests some preven-
tive capacity.19
Despite being supported for shoulder rehabilitation by
some studies, eccentric exercise has a weak level of evidence
in the scientific literature20 as it cannot be ascertained whether
its beneficial effects on injury are specifically from the eccen-
tric component.21,22 Finally, while flexibility is an important
exercise for practitioners, two systematic reviews23,24 have
shown that there is no conclusive evidence to support
stretching to prevent injuries. Both reviews, however, also
highlight that there is no sufficient reason to discontinue
flexibility exercises in the training program.
The aim of this paper is to describe the development of an
adapted FIFA 11+ program, namely the FIFA 11+ shoulder
(FIFA 11+S), which targets the prevention of shoulder injuries
in soccer goalkeepers.
Development of the FIFA 11+S
program
The FIFA 11+S program is structured into sections according
to the FIFA 11+ program already successfully used to prevent
lesions.25 The exercises were selected based on recommen-
dations from studies demonstrating high electromyographic
activity,26–32 including additional exercises to provide varia-
tion and progression.
The program was developed by an international group
of experts, including orthopedics expert in shoulder lesions,
physiotherapists with experience in soccer lesion, and
specialists in sports rehabilitation. For all the exercises,
correct performance is of great importance. Therefore, the
coach should supervise the program and correct the players
if necessary.
The program consists of three parts: general warming-up
exercises (part I), exercises to develop strength and balance
of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger muscles (part II),
and advanced exercises for core stability and muscle control
(part III). The FIFA 11+S takes 20–25 minutes to complete
and replaces the usual warm-up before training (Figure 1).
All exercises focus on core stability, neuromuscular control,
eccentric rotator strength, and agility.
These exercises should be performed three times per
week and should be added to the training taken by the soccer
goalkeeper. Part I exercises should be done for 7 minutes as
a general warm-up. Part II exercises should be performed
for 9–10 minutes in a low-resistance (light tubing strength
or 2–3 kg), high-repetition format (three sets of 15–20 rep-
etitions), in order to improve strength and local muscular
endurance.33 Exercise should be changed according to the
tolerance of the athlete (to A instead of B and C exercises,
Figure 1). In part III, the athlete must do the exercises at
high velocities with five or six sets of 15–20 repetitions not
exceeding 9–10 minutes; these exercises are performed to
increase local muscular endurance.33
The emphasis is given to the strengthening of some
muscle groups such as the shoulder rotator cuff. The external
and internal concentric rotation power balance ratio must be
maintained between 0.6 and 0.8.34 Regarding athletes with
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2016:7
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
76
Ejnisman et al
instability, Ellenbecker and Davies35 suggested as a preventive
measure an increase of 10% in the normal strength relation
(from 66% to 76%), altering the rotator’s relation from 2/3 to
3/4. Internal rotator is an important component of the throw-
ing movement; on the other hand, the antagonist (external
rotator) must be strong enough to decelerate the throwing
movement and to stop the ball when grabbing it.
Other important muscles that should be focused on are
the anterior serratus and lower and medium trapezium to
prevent the scapular dyskinesia. The power of these muscles
and superior trapezium keeps the correct scapulohumeral
rhythm.32,36–39
Open kinetic chain exercises with ball-throwing move-
ments are included, in addition to closed kinetic chain
1 Run
Relaxed walking or running.
the speed can be
progressively increased.
5 min
2 Throw the ball in the chest
line
Ask for help from a partner.
With both hands in front
of the body, throw and catch
the ball, first with your elbows
flexed and then with your
arms over your head. 1 min
3 Spinning movements with
the hands
Interlace the fingers and make
spinning movements with the
hands. 1 min
1A External rotation
Initial position: Standing with
the elbow flexed at 90° to the
side
Exercise: Rotate the arm
from neutral to external
rotation.
.
1B External rotation
Initial position: standing with
the elbow flexed at 90° and
45° abducted
Exercise: Rotate the arm
from the neutral to external
rotation.
2B Internal rotation
Initial position: standing with
the elbow flexed at 90° and
45° abducted
Exercise: Rotate the arm
from neutral to internal
rotation.
2A Internal rotation
Initial position: standing with
the elbow flexed at 90° to the
side
Exercise: Rotate the arm
from neutral to external
rotation.
1C External rotation
Initial position: standing with
the elbow flexed at 90° and
90° abducted
Exercise: Rotate the arm
from the neutral to external
rotation.
2C Internal rotation
Initial position: standing with
the elbow flexed at 90° and
90° abducted
Exercise: Rotate the arm
from neutral to internal
rotation.
3B Scaption
Rise the arm with external
rotation in the scapular plane
(30° in the frontal plane) to
shoulder height. Hold heavier
weight than the previous level.
3A Scaption
Rise the arm with external
rotation in the scapular plane
(30° in the frontal plane) to
shoulder height. Hold a weight.
3C Scaption
Rise the arm with external
rotation in the scapular plane
(30° in the frontal plane) to
shoulder height. Hold heavier
weight than the previous level.
4B Push-up-plus
In the same position. Place an
anklet of 5 kg on your back.
Exercise: Rise the body and
then lower the body
4A Push-up-plus
In the prone position. The
hands should be placed at a
distance corresponding to the
width of the shoulders.
Exercise: Rise the body and
then lower the body
4C Push-up-plus
In the same position but on
one foot. Place an anklet of
more than 5 kg on your back.
Exercise: Rise the body and
then lower the body
5B Inferior and mid trapezius
In the prone position, arms In
90° abduction. After changing
the arms to 120° of abduction.
Exercise: Hold heavier weight
than the previous level and
bring the arm back slightly.
5A Inferior and mid trapezius
In the prone position, arms in
90° abduction. After changing
the arms to 120° of abduction.
Exercise: Hold a weight and
bring the arm back slightly.
5C Inferior and mid trapezius
In the prone position, arms in
90° abduction. After changing
the arms to 120° of abduction.
Exercise: Hold heavier weight
than the previous level and
bring the arm back slightly.
6B Biceps
Position: Arms at your sides,
palms facing inwards. Hold
heavier weight than the
previous level.
Exercise: Bend your elbows,
turning the palms upward.
6A Biceps
Position: Arms at your sides,
palms facing inwards. Hold a
weight.
Exercise: Bend your elbows,
turning the palms upward.
6C Biceps
Position: Arms at your sides,
palms facing inwards. Hold
heavier weight than the
previous level.
Exercise: Bend your elbows,
turning the palms upward.
Part I – Warm-up exercises*
Part II – strength and balance of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger muscles**
Figure 1 (Continued)
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2016:7 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
77
FIFA 11+S upper extremity prevention program
exercises that simulate falls and movements on the ground.
In both cases, the CORE activation is needed to maintain
the correct muscular activation sequence, and transfer and
dissipate energy in the kinetic chain.29,40
The diagonal exercises are used to strengthen the
muscles. The diagonal D1 in the flexor pattern (accelera-
tion) and extension (deceleration) activates the rotator cuff,
scapular waist, and deltoid muscles, which is important
to improve the co-activation of the intra-articular power
couples.37,41
The sensory-motor training is an important part of the
program. The lack of shoulder stability increases the need
of the sensory-motor system for neuromuscular control.
The feed forward and feedback mechanisms are considered
7A Wrist flexors
Position: Support the forearm,
palm of the hand upward. Hold a
weight.
Exercise: Lower the weight as
far as possible and then lift it
up.
7B Wrist flexors
Position: Support the forearm,
palm of the hand upward. Hold
heavier weight than the previous
level.
Exercise: Lower the weight as
far as possible and then lift it up.
7C Wrist flexors
Position: Support the forearm,
palm of the hand upward.Hold
heavier weight than the previous
level.
Exercise: Lower the weight as
far as possible and then lift it up.
8A Wrist extensors
Position: Support the forearm,
palm of the hand down. Hold a
weight.
Exercise: Lift up weight as far as
possible and then lift it up.
8B Wrist extensors
Position: Support the forearm,
palm of the hand down. Hold
heavier weight than the previous
level.
Exercise: Lift up weight as far as
possible and then lift it up.
8C Wrist extensors
Position: Support the forearm,
palm of the hand down. Hold
heavier weight than the previous
level.
Exercise: Lift up weight as far as
possible and then lift it up.
9A Finger flexors
Position: Supported forearm and
palm of the hand down on an
elastic.
Exercise: Close the hand,
pulling the elastic.
9B Finger flexors
Position: Supported forearm and
palm of the hand down on an
elastic. Increase the resistance
of the elastic.
Exercise: Close the hand,
pulling the elastic.
9C Finger flexors
Position: Supported forearm and
palm of the hand down on an
elastic. Increase the resistance
of the elastic.
Exercise: Close the
hand, pulling the elastic.
.
10A Finger extensors
Position: Supported forearm and
palm of the hand upward on an
elastic. The other hand holds the
elastic.
Exercise: Open the hand,
stretching the elastic.
10B Finger extensors
Position: Supported forearm and
palm of the hand upward on an
elastic. The other hand holds the
elastic. Increase the resistance
of the elastic.
Exercise: Open the hand,
stretching the elastic.
10C Finger extensors
Position: Supported forearm and
palm of the hand upward on an
elastic. The other hand holds the
elastic. Increase the resistance
of the elastic.
Exercise: Open the hand,
stretching the elastic.
2 Throw the ball over the head
with an arm
Ask for help from a partner. With
the elbow extended and arm
above the level of the head,
throw and catch the ball with an
arm.
3 Throw the ball to the sides
With the elbow extended, throw
and catch the ball one arm at a
time. Make the movement with
the arm by the body’s side and
lift it up over the head.
Part III – Core stability and muscle control with advanced exercises***
1 Jump and throw the ball over
the head
Ask for help from a partner. Jump
and with the elbow extended
and arm above the level of the
head, throw and catch the ball.
4 Jump with your hands on the
mini trampoline
In prone position, firming
yourself with the feet on the
ground and the palms of the
hands on the mini trampoline.
“jump” with your hands, keeping
the elbows straight.
5 Walking on hands
Ask for a partner to hold your
legs and, in prone position,
“walk” using your hands. Move
forward, backward and to the
sides.
5 Plyometric external rotation
Flexed elbow in 90° and flexed
and abducted arm in 90°. Hold
the elastic and make
movements from neutral to
lateral rotation quickly.
Figure 1 The FIFA 11+ shoulder injury prevention program.
Notes: *Part I should be performed for 7 minutes. **Part II should be performed in 9–10 minutes at 3 sets of 15 repetitions. Exercises should be changed according to the
tolerance of the athlete (to A for B and C exercises). ***Part III, the athlete must do the exercises at high velocities with 5 or 6 sets of 15 to 20 repetitions, not exceeding
9–10 minutes.
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2016:7
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
78
Ejnisman et al
as critical points of the kinetic chain, making their training
extremely important for the prevention of lesions.42
Plyometric training is also included, which facilitates
the increase of excitability of the neural system and the
reactive capacity of the neuromuscular system of healthy
athletes’ shoulders. This training includes the eccentric
movement that produces elastic energy and transforms this
accumulated energy into kinetic energy which is transferred
to the concentric phase using the shortening–strengthening
cycle.30–32,43
Conclusion and future perspectives
We would like to recommend scientists and clinicians to
also consider researching upper extremity injury in soccer
goalkeepers. Considering favorable results from the previ-
ously published research on FIFA 11+ with soccer athletes,
we hypothesize the following benefits of FIFA 11+S: fewer
injuries, fewer costs, and better performance by soccer
goalkeepers.
One of the strengths of this study is the type of athletes
involved, who have not been discussed in the literature,
considering the difficulties in obtaining a program specific
for goalkeepers. The lack of results about the use of this
preventive program is the limitation of this paper.
Future research should investigate the effects of FIFA
11+S to prevent injuries of the upper limbs and improve
performance of the soccer goalkeepers.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Longo UG, Loppini M, Cavagnino R, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Musculo-
skeletal problems in soccer players: current concepts. Clin Cases Miner
Bone Metab. 2012;9(2):107–111.
2. Dvorak J, Junge A, Chomiak J, et al. Risk factor analysis for injuries in
football players. Possibilities for a prevention program. Am J Sports Med.
2000;28(5 Suppl):S69–S74.
3. Hägglund M, Waldén M, Ekstrand J. Exposure and injury risk in Swedish
elite football: a comparison between seasons 1982 and 2001. Scand J
Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(6):364–370.
4. Kirkendall DT, Dvorak J. Effective injury prevention in soccer. Phys
Sports Med. 2010;38(1):147–157.
5. Longo UG, Loppini M, Berton A, Martinelli N, Maffulli N, Denaro V.
Shoulder injuries in soccer players. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab.
2012;9(3):138–141.
6. Terra BB, Ejnisman B, Figueiredo EA, et al. Arthroscopic treatment
of glenohumeral instability in soccer goalkeepers. Int J Sports Med.
2013;34(6):473–476.
7. Cohen M, Abdalla RJ, Ejnisman B, Amaro JT. Lesões ortopédicas no
futebol [Orthopedic injuries in football]. Rev Bras Ortop. 1997;32:
940–944. Portuguese.
8. Junge A, Langevoort G, Pipe A, et al. Injuries in team sport tourna-
ments during the 2004 Olympic Games. Am J Sports Med. 2006;
34(4):565–576.
9. Junge A, Dvorak J, Graf-Baumann T, et al. Football injuries during
FIFA tournaments and the Olympic Games, 1998-2001: development
and implementation of an injury-reporting system. Am J Sports Med.
2004;32(1 Suppl):80S–89S.
10. Ekstrand J, Hagglund M, Walden M. Injury incidence and injury
patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports
Med. 2011;45(7):553–558.
11. Hagglund M, Walden M, Ekstrand J. UEFA injury study: an injury
audit of European championships 2006–2008. Br J Sports Med.
2009;43(7):483–484.
12. Hart D, Funk L. Serious shoulder injuries in professional soccer: return
to participation after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
2015;23(7):2123–2129.
13. Bizzini M, Dvorak J. FIFA 11+: an effective programme to prevent
football injuries in various player groups worldwide-a narrative review.
Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(9):577–579.
14. Barengo NC, Meneses-Echávez JF, Ramírez-Vélez R, Cohen DD, Tovar
G, Bautista JE. The impact of the FIFA 11+ training program on injury
prevention in football players: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res
Public Health. 2014;11(11):11986–12000.
15. Wilk KE, Yenchak AJ, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. The Advanced Throwers
Ten Exercise Program: a new exercise series for enhanced dynamic
shoulder control in the overhead throwing athlete. Phys Sports Med.
2011;39(4):90–97.
16. Reinold MM, Gill TJ, Wilk KE, Andrews JR. Current concepts in
the evaluation and treatment of the shoulder in overhead throwing
athletes, part 2: injury prevention and treatment. Sports Health.
2010;2(2):101–115.
17. Niederbracht Y, Shim AL, Sloniger MA, Paternostro-Bayles M, Short TH.
Effects of a shoulder injury prevention strength training program on
eccentric external rotator muscle strength and glenohumeral joint
imbalance in female overhead activity athletes. J Strength Cond Res.
2008;22(1):140–145.
18. McCall A, Davison M, Andersen TE, et al. Injury prevention strate-
gies at the FIFA 2014 World Cup: perceptions and practices of the
physicians from the 32 participating national teams. Br J Sports Med.
2015;49(9):603–608.
19. McMaster WC, Long SC, Caiozzo VJ. Shoulder torque changes in the
swimming athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(3):323–327.
20. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Spiezia F, et al. Aetiology and prevention of
injuries in elite young athletes. Med Sport Sci. 2011;56:187–200.
21. Ciullo JV, Stevens GG. The prevention and treatment of injuries to the
shoulder in swimming. Sports Med. 1989;7(3):182–204.
22. Van der Hoeven H, Kibler WB. Shoulder injuries in tennis players.
Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(5):435–440.
23. Ellenbecker TS. Rehabilitation of shoulder and elbow injuries in tennis
players. Clin Sports Med. 1995;14(1):87–110.
24. McCann PD, Bigliani LU. Shoulder pain in tennis players. Sports Med.
1994;17(1):53–64.
25. Fifa 11+ a complete warm-up programme. Available from: http://f-marc.
com/11plus/manual/. Accessed December 21, 2015.
26. Moseley JB Jr, Jobe FW, Pink M, Perry J, Tibone J. EMG analysis of
the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J
Sports Med. 199;20(2):128–134.
27. Cricchio M, Frazer C. Scapulothoracic and scapulohumeral exercises:
a narrative review of electromyographic studies. J Hand Ther. 2011;
24(4):322–333.
28. Tsuruike M, Ellenbecker TS. Serratus anterior and lower trapezius
muscle activities during multi-joint isotonic scapular exercises and
isometric contractions. J Athl Train. 2015;50(2):199–210.
29. Sciascia A, Kuschinsky N, Nitz AJ, Mair SD, Uhl TL. Electromyo-
graphical comparison of four common shoulder exercises in unstable
and stable shoulders. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:783824.
30. Cools AM, Witvrouw EE, De Clercq GA, et al. Scapular muscle recruit-
ment pattern: electromyographic response of the trapezius muscle
to sudden shoulder movement before and after a fatiguing exercise.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(5):221–229.
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2016:7 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
79
FIFA 11+S upper extremity prevention program
31. Gaunt BW, McCluskey GM, Uhl TL. An eletromyographic evaluation of
subdividing active-assistive shoulder elevation exercise. Sports Health.
2010;2(5):424–432.
32. Reinold MM, Escamilla RF, Wilk KE. Current concepts in the
scientific and clinical rationale behind exercises for glenohumeral and
scapulothoracic musculature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):
105–117.
33. Fleck S, Kraemer W. Designing Resistance Training Programs.
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.
34. Kibler WB, Thomas SJ. Pathomechanics of the throwing shoulder. Sports
Med Arthrosc. 2012;20(1):22–29.
35. Ellenbecker TS, Davies GJ. The application of isokinetics in test-
ing and rehabilitation of the shoulder complex. J Athl Train. 2000;
35(3):338–350.
36. Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia
AD. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the
2013 consensus statement from the ‘Scapular Summit’. Br J Sports
Med. 2013;47(14):877–885.
37. Escalamilla RF, Barrentine SW, Fleisig GS, et al. Pitching biomechanics
as a pitcher approaches muscular fatigue during a simulated baseball
game. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(1):23–33.
38. Cools AM, Dewitte V, Lanszweert F, et al. Rehabilitation of scapular
muscle balance: which exercises to prescribe? Am J Sports Med.
2007;35(10):1744–1751.
39. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. The Disabled throwing shoulder:
spectrum of pathology. Part 3: The SICK Scapula, scapula dyskinesis, the
kinetic chain, and rehabilitation. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(6):641–661.
40. Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic
function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189–198.
41. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. The Disabled throwing shoulder:
spectrum of pathology. Part 1: Pathoanatomy and biomechanics.
Arthoscopy. 2003;19(4):404–420.
42. Tripp BL, Yochem EM, Uhl TL. Recovery of upper extremity senso-
rimotor system activity in baseball athletes after a throwing – fatigue
protocol. J Athl Train. 2007;42(4):452–457.
43. Chmielewski TL, Myer GD, Kauffman D, Tillman SM. Plyometric
exercise in the rehabilitation of athletes: physiological responses and
clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):308–319.
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
Publish your work in this journal
Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/open-access-journal-of-sports-medicine-journal
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine is an international,
peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research,
reports, reviews and commentaries on all areas of sports
medicine. The manuscript management system is completely
online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system.
Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes
from published authors.
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2016:7
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
Dovepress
80
Ejnisman et al
... Despite having negative implications to soccer clubs and athletes, these injuries are often overlooked and there are few researches about it. The FIFA 11+ program was a step towards the prevention of upper limb injuries, however it was directed mostly for goalkeepers [5,7,8]. Thus, new researches on the topic are important for the creation of new training protocols that cover the entire team of athletes. ...
... Shoulder injuries accounted for 4.3% of the total injuries and 63.3% of upper limb injuries, corroborating similar findings in previous studies [4,12]. Although upper limb injuries are less frequent in soccer players, the sport has evolved into a high-speed game with tactical plays involving more significant physical contact, which may predispose to traumatic injuries [8,[13][14][15][16]. ...
... The increasing prevalence of shoulder injuries has become a health problem for athletes, which led to the development of the FIFA 11+ program to prevent them [8,16]. The program was developed with a focus on goalkeepers, as previous studies has shown that players in this position have a higher incidence of shoulder injuries [9,[17][18][19]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To evaluate epidemiological data of upper limb injuries in professional athletes who participated in two major Brazilian soccer championships between 2016 and 2019. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the teams of two divisions over four seasons within the Brazilian Soccer Championship and the Paulista Soccer Championship. Clubs and their doctors were contacted to participate in the study and guided on the correct way to enter data via online platforms: Transfermarkt (Transfermarkt GmbH & Co. KG) and Survey Monkey (Momentive.AI). Demographic data, injury characteristics, and FIFA Incidence Formula were analyzed. Results Overall, the study analyzed 3,828 matches and 126,357 hours of play. Upper limb injuries were registered 169 times, representing 6.8% of total injuries, with a FIFA incidence of 1.34. Most lesions occurred in forward players (21.3%), the shoulder exhibited the highest number of injuries (63.3%). The player’s position was related to the location on the field where the injury occurred ( p < 0.001); however, there was no relationship between the type of injury and the location on the body ( p > 0.001). The average time to return to play was 19.1 days (range 0–200 days) and it was longer for goalkeepers. The necessity of surgical treatment was statistically associated with additional time to return to play ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Shoulder injuries were the most frequent upper limb injury sustained during the two major Brazilian soccer championships. Forward players suffered the most upper limb injuries and goalkeepers experienced the longest time to return to play.
... There are some well-established injury protocols in other sports, such as FIFA 11+ [22,23], created to prevent lower limb injuries in soccer players. In addition, a shoulder injury program for goalkeepers was created, FIFA 11+ S, which presents a series of well-structured exercises for the shoulder [24]. Currently, there is no FIFA 11+ style injury prevention program in the literature for basketball athletes, much less for wheelchair basketball athletes, to be integrated as an essential part of training. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Knowledge and understanding of the most diverse aspects surrounding the emergence of sports injuries stand out as one of the pillars for sporting success. Methods: A total of 41 athletes answered an online form based on the Sports Injury Protocol in Paralympic Sports (PLEEP) in which data on sports injuries during competition in the first Brazilian wheelchair basketball division were collected. Results: The athletes who composed the sample perform a high volume of training. The majority did not present with injuries before the competition. There was a prevalence of 17.1% of injuries during the competition, an incidence of 0.17 injuries per athlete and an incidence rate of 0.03 injuries per athlete-hour or four injuries per one thousand athletes-days. The injuries that occurred during the competition were mostly in the shoulder region, characterized as traumatic, by direct contact with other athletes, which occurred when propelling the wheelchair, and were of low severity. Conclusions: The wheelchair basketball athletes presented a low prevalence, incidence and incidence rate of injuries during the competition. The shoulder region was the most affected. Structuring training sessions with the prevention of injuries in the shoulder region in mind is essential for these athletes to perform optimally.
... Some injury prevention programmes have also been investigated in terms of effectiveness by a few authors [5][6][7][8][9]. Some of these programmes include the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center (OSTRC) Shoulder Injury Prevention Programme for handball players [11], the Advanced Throwers Ten Exercise Program for overhead throwing athletes [12] and the FIFA 11+ shoulder injury prevention program for goalkeepers [13] and volleyball players [14,15]. The above programmes have shown a statistically significant reduction in injury occurrence compared to control groups. ...
Article
Full-text available
This editorial aims to feature authors who intend to submit their research to this Special Issue of Sports entitled “Clinical Advances in Upper Limb Sports Rehabilitation and Injury Prevention” in areas that need special consideration [...]
Article
Full-text available
Background Little attention has been paid to playing position as a risk factor for recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in soccer players. Purpose To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and recurrence after ABR between goalkeepers and field position players in soccer. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A retrospective comparative cohort study was performed in soccer players who underwent ABR between January 2017 and December 2019. The minimum clinical follow-up was 2 years. Functional outcomes included the Rowe score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and shoulder-dependent sports ability measured with the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS). The difference between the post- and preoperative scores was calculated; rate and level of return to sport, recurrent instability, and revisions were also evaluated according to position played. Results A total of 70 position players and 11 goalkeepers met the study criteria. Postoperative functional outcomes were significantly improved in both groups as compared with baseline ( P < .001 for both), although the position players achieved significantly greater pre- to postoperative improvement (ΔVAS, –2 vs 0 points [ P = .029]; ΔRowe, 45 vs 30 points [ P = .046]; ΔASOSS, 45 vs 40 points [ P = .028]). While all players returned to soccer, only 55% (n = 6) of goalkeepers returned to the same level versus 93% of field players ( P = .003). The overall rate of recurrent instability was 8.6% but was significantly higher among goalkeepers (27.2% vs 5.7%; P = .049), and the odds of goalkeepers having a recurrence were significantly higher than field position players (odds ratio, 8.5 [95% CI, 1.2-57.2]; P = .027). Conclusion Although the results of ABR were generally favorable in all soccer players, goalkeepers had significantly worse functional outcomes, a lower rate of return to the same level of sport, and a higher recurrence rate as compared with field position players.
Article
Full-text available
This statement paper summarises and appraises the evidence on diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of common shoulder injuries in sports. We systematically searched Medline and Embase. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool was applied to evaluate the overall quality of evidence. For diagnosis, we included 19 clinical tests from mixed populations. Tests for anterior instability, biceps-labrum complex injuries and full subscapularis rupture had high diagnostic accuracy (low to moderate quality of evidence). For prevention, the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, the Shoulder Control, the FIFA 11+ shoulder injury prevention programmes, and a baseball-specific programme (range of motion, stretching, dynamic stability and strengthening exercises) showed moderate to large effect size in reducing the risk of shoulder injury compared with no intervention (very low to moderate quality of evidence). For treatment, a rehabilitation programme including stretching, ice packs, electrotherapy and compression, and strengthening exercises showed a large effect size in reducing pain and disability compared with no intervention in athletes with subacromial impingement syndrome (very low to moderate quality of evidence). For the treatment of supraspinatus tendinopathy, hyperthermia treatment (heating the skin to 38°C–40°C) resulted in large effect size in reducing pain and disability compared with ultrasound or pendular swinging and stretching exercises (moderate quality of evidence). Strengthening exercise alone or in combination with stretching exercises promoted a large effect in reducing shoulder pain (cohort studies, no comparators) (very low quality of evidence). The quality of evidence for most estimates was low to moderate, indicating that future high-quality research may alter our recommendations for clinical practice.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose. Soccer is one of the most popular sports worldwide. Soccer goalkeepers are more likely than outfield players to injure their upper extremities, particularly their shoulders. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+ Shoulder Injury Prevention Program (FIFA 11+S) was developed to prevent upper extremity injuries. The aim of this study was to assess soccer goalkeepers’ and goalkeepers’ coaches’ awareness, implementation, and opinion of FIFA 11+S effectiveness in reducing upper extremity injuries. Materials and methods. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and distributed to worldwide professional soccer goalkeepers and goalkeepers’ coaches. The survey was available in 10 different languages. The questionnaire consisted of questions covering the awareness, implementation, and goalkeepers’ and goalkeepers’ coaches’ opinion of the FIFA 11+ Shoulder Injury Prevention Program in reducing upper extremity injuries. Questions development was guided by several authors expert in sport medicine and injury prevention programs. Results. A total of 722 goalkeepers and goalkeepers’ coaches completed the survey. The vast majority (97.60%) of the participants were goalkeepers. Only 204 (28.25%) participants were aware of FIFA 11+S, and 155 (21.46 %) were implementing FIFA 11+S in their current practice. Participants who implemented FIFA 11+S reported a positive opinion about the program efficacy, with a score of 8.19 ± 0.93 out of 10. Conclusions. This study is the first to investigate goalkeepers’ and coaches’ awareness, implementation, and opinion of the effectiveness of the FIFA 11+S program in reducing shoulder injuries globally. Overall, the awareness rate was exceptionally low, but the implementation level among aware participants was good. Goalkeepers and coaches attained a positive score regarding the FIFA 11+S effectiveness in reducing shoulder injuries. Further efforts and research are needed to increase the awareness and usage of the FIFA 11+S program.
Article
Background Shoulder injuries and sports-related shoulder pain represent a significant burden for athletes who participate in overhead sports. The challenges in injury prevention lie in identifying relevant risk factors and implementing viable injury prevention programs.Objectives Determination of relevant risk factors of shoulder injuries and of evidence-based injury prevention programs for overhead athletes.Materials and methodsEvaluation and critical review of clinical studies and expert opinions regarding risk factors and injury prevention programs for overhead athletes.ResultsMost of the potential risk factors have limited evidence and are not modifiable. Among the modifiable risk factors, it was shown that pre-existing glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), limited range of motion, imbalance of muscle strength for internal and external rotation to the disadvantage of external rotation, and scapular dyskinesia can increase the risk of chronic shoulder pain due to overuse. Training and competition volume have been found to increase the risk of shoulder injury as fatigue increases. Several prevention programs reduced the incidence of shoulder injuries. For all programs, compliance seems to be of major importance.Conclusion Risk factors for shoulder injuries have been identified and can be assessed in overhead athletes. While many important risk factors are non-modifiable, several others can be addressed by specific prevention programs. Several successful programs have been developed. Compliance and acceptance among overhead athletes are of major importance to reduce the risk of injury.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Low-load blood flow restriction (BFR) training may induce positive neuromuscular adaptations, but proximal BFR effects are unclear. This study aims to investigate chronic effects of low-load resistance training (LLRT) with BFR on upper extremity neuromuscular performance of healthy women.Methods This protocol for clinical trial will include 78 volunteers randomized into three groups of 26 participants: LLRT (LLRT without BFR); LLRT + placebo blood flow restriction (20% BFR); and LLRT + 60% BFR. All groups will perform four sets of 15 repetitions at 20% of one-repetition maximum for each of the following muscles: serratus anterior, lateral shoulder rotators, and lower trapezius. Participants will be assessed before protocol, after completing eight weeks of protocol, and after a four-week follow-up. Primary outcome will be muscle strength, and secondary outcomes will be muscle excitation, perimetry, pain, subjective perceived exertion, affective valence with exercise, and power of upper extremity muscles.DiscussionExercises are often used to prevent and treat upper limb disorders. However, only two studies analyzed the effects of these exercises associated with BFR. Therefore, this protocol aims to fill the gaps in these studies and propose more reliable results on the subject.Trial registration: EnsaiosClinicos.gov.br (Identifier: RBR-3pd52f).
Article
Full-text available
In 2009, FIFA promoted and disseminated the FIFA 11+ injury prevention programme worldwide. Developed and studied by the FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Centre (F-MARC), the programme was based on a randomised controlled study and one countrywide campaign in amateur football that significantly reduced injuries and healthcare costs. Since the FIFA 11+ launch, key publications have confirmed the preventive effects of the programme and have evaluated its performance effects in female as well as male amateur football players. Furthermore, implementation strategies of this prevention programme have also been studied. The goal of this narrative review was to summarise the available scientific evidence about the FIFA 11+ programme. While FIFA continues to disseminate and implement FIFA 11+ among its Member Associations, adaptations of the injury prevention programme for children and referees have been developed and are currently being evaluated. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Article
Full-text available
The available scientific research regarding injury prevention practices in international football is sparse. The purpose of this study was to quantify current practice with regard to (1) injury prevention of top-level footballers competing in an international tournament, and (2) determine the main challenges and issues faced by practitioners in these national teams. A survey was administered to physicians of the 32 competing national teams at the FIFA 2014 World Cup. The survey included 4 sections regarding perceptions and practices concerning non-contact injuries: (1) risk factors, (2) screening tests and monitoring tools, (3) preventative strategies and (4) reflection on their experience at the World Cup. Following responses from all teams (100%), the present study revealed the most important intrinsic (previous injury, accumulated fatigue, agonist:antagonist muscle imbalance) and extrinsic (reduced recovery time, training load prior to and during World Cup, congested fixtures) risk factors during the FIFA 2014 World Cup. The 5 most commonly used tests for risk factors were: flexibility, fitness, joint mobility, balance and strength; monitoring tools commonly used were: medical screen, minutes/matches played, subjective and objective wellness, heart rate and biochemical markers. The 5 most important preventative exercises were: flexibility, core, combined contractions, balance and eccentric. The present study showed that many of the National football (soccer) teams' injury prevention perceptions and practices follow a coherent approach. There remains, however, a lack of consistent research findings to support some of these perceptions and practices. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Article
Full-text available
The FIFA 11+ is a simple, and easy to implement, sports injury prevention program comprising a warm up of 10 conditioning exercises. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of the FIFA 11+ on injury incidence, compliance and cost effectiveness when implemented among football players. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched using the search terms "FIFA 11+", "football", "soccer", "injury prevention", and "The 11". The titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers and the data were filtered by one reviewer using a standardized extraction form and thereafter checked by another one. The risk of bias and the methodological quality of the studies were evaluated through the PEDro score and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). A total of 911 studies were identified, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria of the review. The FIFA 11+ has demonstrated how a simple exercise program completed as part of warm-up can decrease the incidence of injuries in amateur football players. In general, considerable reductions in the number of injured players, ranging between 30% and 70%, have been observed among the teams that implemented the FIFA 11+. In addition, players with high compliance to the FIFA 11+ program had an estimated risk reduction of all injuries by 35% and show significant improvements in components of neuromuscular and motor performance when participating in structured warm-up sessions at least 1.5 times/week. Most studies had high methodological quality and a low risk of bias. Given the large number of people who play football at amateur level and the detrimental impact of sports injuries on a personal and societal level, the FIFA 11+ can be considered as a fundamental tool to minimize the risks of participation in a sport with substantial health benefits.
Article
Full-text available
Proper scapular function during humeral elevation, such as upward rotation, external rotation, and posterior tilting of the scapula, is necessary to prevent shoulder injury. However, the appropriate intensity of rehabilitation exercise for the periscapular muscles has yet to be clarified. To identify the serratus anterior, lower trapezius, infraspinatus, and posterior deltoid muscle activities during 2 free-motion exercises using 3 intensities and to compare these muscle activities with isometric contractions during quadruped shoulder flexion and external rotation and abduction of the glenohumeral joint. Cross-sectional study. Health Science Laboratory. A total of 16 uninjured, healthy, active, male college students (age = 19.5 ± 1.2 years, height = 173.1 ± 6.5 cm, weight = 68.8 ± 6.6 kg). Mean electromyographic activity normalized by the maximal voluntary isometric contraction was analyzed across 3 intensities and 5 exercises. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for electromyographic activity of the 4 muscles in each free-motion exercise. Significant interactions in electromyographic activity were observed between intensities and exercises (P < .05). The quadruped shoulder-flexion exercise activated all 4 muscles compared with other exercises. Also, the modified robbery free-motion exercise activated the serratus anterior, lower trapezius, and infraspinatus compared with the lawn-mower free-motion exercise. However, neither exercise showed a difference in posterior deltoid electromyographic activity. Three intensities exposed the nature of the periscapular muscle activities across the different exercises. The free-motion exercise in periscapular muscle rehabilitation may not modify serratus anterior, lower trapezius, and infraspinatus muscle activities unless knee-joint extension is limited.
Article
Full-text available
An evidence base for the management and prevention of shoulder injuries in soccer is lacking. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the type, mechanism and recovery time after surgery associated with serious shoulder injuries sustained in professional soccer to build an evidence base foundation. Fifty-two professional soccer players underwent shoulder surgery for injuries sustained during match play. Of these, 25 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Data were collected for injury mechanism and type; clinical, radiological and surgical findings and procedures; and return to full participation. Subjects were all managed by the same surgeon. Labral injuries represented the most common injury type affecting 21 (84 %) subjects; two rotator cuff (8 %) and two combined labral/rotator cuff (8 %) injuries were less common. Fourteen (56 %) subjects sustained a high-energy trauma injury in a combined abduction and external rotation position. Six (24 %) subjects sustained a low-energy trauma mechanism in variable positions, while five (20 %) had a gradual onset of symptoms. Twenty-two (88 %) subjects reported a dislocation as a feature of their presentation. All of the subjects with high- and low-energy trauma mechanisms reported a dislocation occurring at the time of injury. Eight (32 %) subjects had sustained a previous significant shoulder injury to the ipsilateral side. Goalkeepers did not sustain low-energy trauma injuries. Outfield players returned to full participation in a mean time of 11.6 weeks, while goalkeepers did so in 11.1 weeks post-surgery. Return to participation time ranged from 7 to 24 weeks with a median of 11 weeks. Professional soccer players can expect a return to participation within 12 weeks post-surgery. The majority of serious shoulder injuries in soccer occur at a positional extreme of external rotation and abduction in high-energy situations, while a significant number occur in low-energy situations away from this position. Most serious shoulder injuries in professional soccer are dislocations. Previous shoulder injury is considered a risk factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Article
Full-text available
The second international consensus conference on the scapula was held in Lexington Kentucky. The purpose of the conference was to update, present and discuss the accumulated knowledge regarding scapular involvement in various shoulder injuries and highlight the clinical implications for the evaluation and treatment of shoulder injuries. The areas covered included the scapula and shoulder injury, the scapula and sports participation, clinical evaluation and interventions and known outcomes. Major conclusions were (1) scapular dyskinesis is present in a high percentage of most shoulder injuries; (2) the exact role of the dyskinesis in creating or exacerbating shoulder dysfunction is not clearly defined; (3) shoulder impingement symptoms are particularly affected by scapular dyskinesis; (4) scapular dyskinesis is most aptly viewed as a potential impairment to shoulder function; (5) treatment strategies for shoulder injury can be more effectively implemented by evaluation of the dyskinesis; (6) a reliable observational clinical evaluation method for dyskinesis is available and (7) rehabilitation programmes to restore scapular position and motion can be effective within a more comprehensive shoulder rehabilitation programme.
Article
Full-text available
Even though soccer is the most popular sport of the world, no review is available at present to resume the available data on shoulder injuries in soccer. The aim of this review is to report the available epidemiological data on shoulder specific injuries in soccer players and to describe the common mechanisms of shoulder injuries in soccer. Studies published through September 15, 2011, were identified by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pre-CINAHL, Pub-Med, Web of Science, and the full Cochrane Library. Reference lists of included studies were searched by hand. Studies were included if they reported on shoulder injuries in soccer players. Limits were not placed on year of publication, status of publication, or language. The journal, authors, and author affiliations of included studies were masked from 2 reviewers. We planned to perform a study on the epidemiology, mechanisms and management of shoulder injuries in elite soccer players. We also planned to use Review Manager (RevMan. Version 5 for Windows) to calculate the magnitude of treatment effect. No studies on clinical outcome of shoulder injuries in elite soccer athletes were found. No studies on the mechanism of shoulder injury in elite soccer players were found. The results of the available studies on epidemiology are reported. Despite soccer is the world's game, few studies focused on shoulder injuries in soccer players, and therefore no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Further research is warranted to clarify the epidemiology, mechanisms and management of shoulder injuries in elite soccer players.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to report epidemiologic data and results of arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability in soccer goalkeepers. We included 12 soccer goalkeepers with a mean age of 28.9 years (range 18-45 years) with acute or recurrent traumatic anterior instability who underwent an arthroscopic anatomic capsulolabral repair with bone anchors. Patients who underwent surgery within 4 weeks of the first episode of dislocation were classified as acute instability. The results were evaluated using the Rowe Scale and analyzed according to stability, range of motion and function. The mean follow-up was 3.8 years. The most common mechanism of injury (90% of the cases) was abduction, external rotation and extension. Associated injuries were present in 57.2% of recurrent cases and 20% of acute cases (p<0.293). Excellent or good results were observed in 80% of the cases of acute instability and in 57.2% of cases in the group with recurrent instability (p<0.586). From a total of 12 soccer goalkeepers who underwent the arthroscopic capsulolabral repair, good or excellent results were obtained in 66.6% of cases of glenohumeral instability. Surgical arthroscopic repair was possible in all cases of acute or recurrent instability based on well-established inclusion criteria, i. e., with well-defined exclusion criteria, such as HAGL lesion and significant glenohumeral bone loss, the arthroscopic capsulolabral repair can be carried out in soccer goalkeepers.
Article
Full-text available
Soccer is the most popular sport worldwide, with about 200 million players, both professionals and amateurs. Because of its popularity, it has been often proposed to be able to prevent or cure health problems around the world. Although participation in football leads to significant physical benefits such as improving well-being, extending life expectancy and reducing the likelihood of several major non-communicable diseases, the possibility to incur in soccer injuries must be considered. On average, an elite football player suffers from 1.5-7.6 injuries each 1,000 hours of training and 12-35 injuries each 1000 hours of match. Several risk factors for soccer injuries have been described. The most important of them are the level of play (the risk appears to be higher in professional than amateur players); the exercise load; and the standard of training. The injury prevention program "The 11", developed with the support of the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), aims to reduce the impact of intrinsic injury risk factors in soccer, and it has been validated in that sport. A successive modified version of "The 11" ("The 11+") has been also shown to be effective in preventing injuries in young female soccer players. The FIFA 11+ provided more than 40% of reduction of the risk of injury. Several factors can be related to the risk of injury during sport. Therefore different exercises or factors might have been responsible for efficacy of the FIFA 11+ to prevent injuries. Several improvements have been surely achieved in the last ten years, but further investigation is needed to improve the benefits of playing soccer on human health.
Article
Full-text available
Active-assistive range of motion exercises to gain shoulder elevation have been subdivided into gravity-minimized and upright-assisted exercises, yet no study has evaluated differences in muscular demands. Compared with gravity-minimized exercises, upright-assisted exercises will generate larger electromyographic (EMG) activity. Compared with all active-assistive exercises, upright active forward elevation will generate more EMG activity. Controlled laboratory study. Fifteen healthy individuals participated in this study. The supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and anterior deltoid were evaluated. The independent variables were 11 exercises performed in random order. The dependent variable was the maximum EMG amplitude of each muscle that was normalized to a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Each muscle demonstrated significant differences between exercises (P < .001), with upright active forward elevation producing the greatest EMG for all muscles (95% confidence interval [CI], 12% to 50% MVIC). The orders of exercise varied by muscle, but the 5 gravity-minimized exercises always generated the lowest EMG activity. The upright-assisted exercises (95% CI, 23% to 42% MVIC) for the anterior deltoid generated more EMG activity than did the gravity-minimized exercises (95% CI, 9% to 21% MVIC) (P < .05). The infraspinatus and supraspinatus demonstrated increasing trends in EMG activity from gravity minimized to upright assisted (P > .05). The results suggest a clear distinction between gravity-minimized exercises and upright-assisted exercises for the anterior deltoid but not for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Between the 2 types of assisted exercises, the results also suggest a clear distinction in terms of active elevation of the arm for the supraspinatus and anterior deltoid but not for the infraspinatus. Muscle activation levels increase as support is removed, but subdivision of active-assistive range of motion to protect the supraspinatus and infraspinatus may not be necessary.