ArticlePDF Available

Waste Management in Germany – Development to a Sustainable Circular Economy?

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The new German Closed Cycle Management Act is aimed to turn the waste management into a resource management. The realisation that waste can be a useful source of raw materials and energy is not new; metals, glass, and textiles have been collected before and put to new use. The waste management policy, which has been adapted in Germany over the past 20 years, is based on closed cycles and assigns disposal responsibilities to manufacturers and distributors of products. This has made people even more aware of the necessity to separate waste, led to the introduction of new disposal technologies, and increased recycling capacities. Today, 14 per cent of the raw materials used by the German industry are recovered waste. Modern closed cycle management contributes, with a share of approximately 20 per cent, to achieve the German Kyoto targets on the reduction of climate-relevant emissions.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 14
1878-0296 © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of 5IconSWM 2015
doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.001
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
International Conference on Solid Waste Management, 5IconSWM 2015
Waste Management in Germany – Development to a Sustainable
Circular Economy?
M. Nellesa,b,*, J. Grünesa, G. Morschecka*
aUniversity of Rostock, Department of Waste Management and Material Flow, Germany
b German Biomass Research Centre gGmbH (DBFZ), TorgauerStraße 116, 04347 Leipzig, Germany
Abstract
The new German Closed Cycle Management Act is aimed to turn the waste management into a resource management. The
realisation that waste can be a useful source of raw materials and energy is not new; metals, glass, and textiles have been
collected before and put to new use. The waste management policy, which has been adapted in Germany over the past 20 years,
is based on closed cycles and assigns disposal responsibilities to manufacturers and distributors of products. This has made
people even more aware of the necessity to separate waste, led to the introduction of new disposal technologies, and increased
recycling capacities. Today, 14 per cent of the raw materials used by the German industry are recovered waste. Modern closed
cycle management contributes, with a share of approximately 20 per cent, to achieve the German Kyoto targets on the reduction
of climate-relevant emissions.
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of 5IconSWM 2015.
Keywords: Waste, Recovery, Recycling, Bio waste, Germany;
1. Introduction
The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety publish data and
publications of the waste management in Germany. The following article will use these publications very closely to
describe the waste situation in Germany (Jaron and Flaschentreher, 2012).
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: michael.nelles@uni-rostock.de
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of 5IconSWM 2015
7
M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
The new German Closed Cycle Management Act (Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz, KrWG) is aimed to turn the waste
management into a resource management. The realisation that waste can be a useful source of raw materials and
energy is not new; metals, glass, and textiles have been collected before and put to new use. The waste management
policy, which has been adapted in Germany over the past 20 years, is based on closed cycles and assigns disposal
responsibilities to manufacturers and distributors of products. This has made people even more aware of the
necessity to separate waste, led to the introduction of new disposal technologies,and increased recycling capacities.
Today, 14 per cent of the raw materials used by the German industry are recovered waste, thus leads to a
reduction of the extraction levels and of the related environmental impacts. Modern closed cycle management
contributes, with a share of approximately 20 per cent, to achieve the German Kyoto targets on the reduction of
climate-relevant emissions.
Closed cycle management is not only a contribution to the environmental protection, it also pays off
economically. The waste management industry has become an extensive and powerful economic sector in Germany:
almost 200,000 people are employed in approximately 3,000 companies which generate an annual turnover of
approximately 40 billion euro. 15,000 installations contribute to resource efficiency by recycling and recovery
procedures. High recycling rates of approximately 60 per cent for municipal waste, 60 per cent for commercial
waste, and 90 per cent for construction and demolition waste speak for themselves.
Fig. 1. Waste Hierarchy according European and German Law
Waste management was under a radical trans-formation since the early Seventies. At this time every village and
town had its own tip (some 50,000 of them in total); today untreated domestic and commercial waste can no longer
be deposited at landfill sites.
The European Union aims at the same conditions in the Member States. Both the living conditions and the
methods of disposal are still quite different.
8 M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
Fig. 2. Municipal Solid Waste treatment in selected EU countries (in%) (EuroStat 2015)
2. Waste Management Policy in Germany
Article 4 of the revised EU Waste Framework Directive (Directive 2008/98/EC) sets out five steps for dealing
with waste, ranked according to the environmental impact – the “waste hierarchy”.
The Waste Hierarchy gives top priority to preventing the creation of waste in the first place. When waste is
created, it gives priority to preparing it for re-use, recycling, other recovery (such as energy recovery) and disposal
(landfill after pre-treatment) in descending order of environmental preference.
The waste hierarchy has been transposed into German law.
A new obligation is included to draw up a national waste prevention programme (Article 33 KrWG). The
programme formulates waste prevention targets, presents and evaluates existing waste prevention measures, and
develops new measures on this basis. The aim is to strengthen waste prevention policies and make them more
transparent to the general public. The Federal Ministry of the Environment formulated a waste prevention
programme for the first time in 2013.
The Closed Cycle Management Act has also created the opportunity to introduce an obligatory, nationwide
“uniform recycling bin”. With this collection system, households should not only dispose of packaging but also
other waste of the same materials, e. g. plastics or metal, in a new recycling bin. This means that recyclables from
domestic waste can be collected in better quality and in larger quantities. It is proposed to regulate further details of
the collection of recyclables in a separate law in the near future.
Since 1st of June 2005: wastes cannot longer be landfilled without pre-treatment! The pre-treatment takes place
in incineration plants or mechanical-biological treatment plants. Waste must be treated so that it cannot degrade
inside a landfill. Recoverable substances have to be separated before landfilling and the energy from the wastes have
to be utilised.
9
M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
Pre-treatment and stopping untreated landfilling protects our health and the climate. Landfills do not longer
emit landfill gas – this gas contains methane and carbon dioxide.
Landfill-gas methane (CH4) causes 21-25 times more damage to the climate than carbon dioxide (CO2)
(Greenhouse-Effect).
The emission of harmful leachate into the groundwater is one of the additional problems that the mankind has
with landfills – waste pre-treatment leads to much better leachate qualities.
The German waste management system is totally financed by fees! No subsidies! There is a “polluter-pays”
principle, means the producer has to pay for waste treatment or disposal.
Various groups of main stakeholders are working in waste management - municipal and private waste
management companies (waste collection, recovery and disposal). Municipal waste management companies are
responsible for bio waste and residual waste (domestic waste); private waste management companies are responsible
for the waste recycling (domestic waste; trade waste, commercial waste).
3. Waste Arisings
ġThe amount of waste currently produced is still too high. In particular in the field of municipal waste,
further efforts towards a resource efficient consumption are needed to prevent waste from arising. The German
waste prevention programme, launched in 2013, will contribute to develop advice, support, and incentive measures.ġ
2013, there were only minor changes in the waste composition.
Fig. 3. Waste arising in Germany (in million tonnes) (BMU, 2015)
Overall, there were 339.132 million tons of waste; the recycling rate was 79 %. 202.735 million tons of
construction and demolition waste (87 %); 57.577 million tons of waste from production processes and commercial
waste (69 %); 29.250 million tons of mining rubble (1 %) and 49.570 million tons of municipal solid waste (87 %).
10 M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
Fig. 4. Waste arising in Germany (in kg per inhabitant) (BMU, 2015)
In 2013 617 kg per inhabitant municipal waste including the share of household waste of 453 kg per inhabitant
were produced in Germany.
4. Waste recovery and Waste disposal
The responsibility for packaging materials was already enforced in the Packaging Ordinance (VerpackV) in
1991. This ordinance has been amended various times in the recent years. It contains provisions on the obligation of
producers and distributors to take back used packaging. In order to meet this obligation, retailers can participate in a
system for the collection and recycling of the packaging materials. In 1993, a corresponding collection and disposal
system was introduced in Germany. As a result, it was possible to significantly reduce the proportion of packaging
in municipal waste.
Germany’s waste recovery rates are one of the highest in the world and show how the waste industry
contributes to sustainable economic production and management in Germany by saving raw materials and primary
energy. The share of waste which cannot be recovered has to be consigned to disposal without inflicting harm on the
environment or on human health. Organic waste always has to undergo mechanic-biological or thermal treatment to
render it inert, thus helping to reduce drainage water leakages and releases of landfill gas. Since June 2005, it is no
longer permitted to landfill organic waste without prior treatment. Around 70 waste incineration facilities with a
capacity of 20 million tonnes are available in Germany for the treatment of residual waste. Moreover 4.6 million
tonnes in incineration capacities are available in 30 refuse-derived fuel power plants. For the mechanic-biological
treatment of waste, 44 facilities with a capacity of around 5.5 million tonnes are available.
4.1 Recovery of Waste Paper
Print products and paper for office and administration purposes are referred to graphic papers. The
initiative of the Federal Environment Ministry Germany included a voluntary commitment in which a gradually
increase of the recycling rate of graphic paper is fixed since 1994. Since 2001 Germany tries to keep the rate
permanently at a level of 80 per cent (+/- 3 per cent). This pledge has been kept to date which is highly welcomed
from the environmental perspective. Thus, the industry is clearly meeting the waste-related responsibility for its
products. At the same time, this underpins the importance of waste paper recycling in the German paper producing
industry and it contributes considerably to reduce the impacts on the environment.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
MSW Bulkywasteandothers
CollectedOrganicWaste Recycling(paper,packaging,glas…)
11
M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
Fig. 5. Composition of household waste 2010 (in million tonnes)
4.2 Recovery of Packaging Materials
ġThe most packaging is used to cover and protect food. Common packaging materials are glass, aluminium, tin
plate, plastic, paper, cardboard, and wood – all of them valuable (secondary) raw materials which, if reused or
recycled,ġcan help to reduce the exploitation of natural resources, lead to energy savings and reduce the emission of
greenhouse gases.
Fig. 6. Recycling of Waste Paper in Germany (1995 – 2014) (UBA, 2016)
Householdwaste,
householdͲlike
commercialwaste;
13.2Mio.tonnes
Bulkywaste;
2.35Mio.tonnes
Wastefrom
biobins;
4.6Mio.tonnes
Biodegradable
gardenandpark
waste;5.2Mio.
tonnes
Recycling(paper,
packaging,glas…);
12.1Mio.tonnes
40.2%
54.3%
57.6%
75.2%74.0%75.8%75.3%
78.7%80.5%79.2%80.9%82.5%81.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
PaperConsumption[Mio.tonnes] Recyclingofpaper[Mio.tonnes] Recyclingrate[%]
12 M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
The separate collection of packaging waste in households, introduced by the packaging ordinance, is supported
with great commitment and widely followed by the population. In 2010, packaging waste achieved a total recovery
rate of almost 85% in Germany. On average, every German citizen is already consigning almost 30 kg of waste per
year to separate collection in yellow bins. In addition, waste glass packaging and waste paper/cardboard packaging is
collected separately.
Fig. 7. Development of recovery rates of packaging waste between 1991 and 2013 (%)
4.3 Recovery of Bio waste
Around 12 million tonnes of biodegradable waste are treated yearly in composting and digestion plants (biogas
installations) in Germany (mainly waste from the bio bin, biodegradable garden and park waste, market waste and
other biodegradable waste of diverse origins). Around 9 million tonnes were collected separately, either via the bio
bin (4.5 million tonnes) or as separately collected garden and park waste (4.5 million tonnes); this is equivalent to an
average annual collection rate of 107 kg per citizen. Of the total bio waste volume, around 8 million tonnes were
processed in 924 composting facilities and around 4.3 million tonnes were consigned to around 1,000 digestion
plants. Around 3.55 million tonnes of compost and approximately 2.96 million tonnes of fermentation products for
various purposes were produced from the collected bio waste.
The demand for high quality compost currently exceeds the supply. There is a good reason for this: compost or
digestate produced from separately collected and treated bio waste can be used for fertilising (nutrients) and soil
amelioration (humus). If bio waste, which is suited for the purpose, is consigned to digestion it is, moreover,
possible to recover the energy generated. It is, for example, also possible to produce substrate mixtures for specific
purposes from specially composted bio waste and soils. Concepts of this kind can play a significant role in the
conservation of resources. Bio waste is also expected to make a larger contribution to energy generation in the
future. Therefore, the amended Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) provides support when existing composting
plants are supplemented with a fermentation phase. Process combinations of this kind generate both usable biogas
and valuable compost which can be used for fertilisation and soil amelioration.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1991
1992
1995
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
13
M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
Fig.8. Use of Compost in Germany 2014 (German Compost Quality Assurance Association, 2014)
The most waste fractions are separately collected, the recycling quota are different. Not all waste fractions can
be collected completely separately. Not all citizens use the collection systems for the various waste fractions. If a
single waste fraction could be collected, it is also recycled to a very high percentage.
Fig. 9. MSW-Recycling Quota in Germany (2013) (coverage quota = collection rate)
60.6%
16.6%
7.6%
7.6%
3.5%2.1%2.0%
Agriculture
Soilmanufactory
Landscaping/Recultivation
Hobbygardening
Specificcrops
Profigardening
Others
100
100
96
100
100
96
85
65
99
100
99
93
99
93
81
53
15
71
0 102030405060708090100
electricalequipment
paper,cardboard
aluminium
bioͲwaste
glass
packaging
bulkywaste
residualwastefromhouseholds
othermaterials(composites,metal,textile……)
RecyclingRate[%] RecoveryRate[%]
14 M. Nelles et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 ( 2016 ) 6 – 14
The separate collection ensures a large amount of relatively clean waste. These separated fractions can then
be recycled in various ways. More than two-thirds of household waste can be recycled.
Householdwaste(kg/person)462
Residualwaste162
Bulkywaste 29
Others(hazardouswaste)2

Recycledwastes(kg/person)271
Wastepaper 72
Biowaste(biobin,greenwaste)57+64
Wasteglass23
Lightweightpackaging(aluminium,plastics,tinplate,composites) 33
Others (metals,electricalandelectronicalequipment,batteries) 20
Fig. 10. “Use” of household wastes (kg/person in 2014)
The collection of recyclable waste is well established in Germany. Nevertheless, there are always some
problems to improve the quality of recovery. The proportion of recycling needs to be further increased. Too many
high-calorific wastes are incinerated instead of material recycling.
5. Problems today and development tomorrow
Waste management in Germany is characterised by a good development in the last 40 years, but some problems
are still on the table and some new problems are coming up. The prices for waste treatment vary greatly.
Overcapacities of waste-treatment plants lead to falling prices. If plants are closed the treatment prices are regional
rising. There are significant problems between the municipal and the private waste management companies (who
will collect and recycle the recyclable wastes from households?). It arise always problems in financing the
collection and recycling of waste from the yellow bin. These wastes are not funded by a waste fee. Since 1 January
2015, more recyclable wastes have to be collected and recycled. The transformation of the yellow bin (recyclable
lightweight packaging) into a container for reusable materials is delayed since months. The nationwide collection of
all organic wastes has not been realized yet. Still too many wastes are incinerated (thermal recycling) although
material recycling would be ecologically beneficial.
References
1. Federal Statistical Office (Destatis): https://www.destatis.de
2. Jaron, A. and Flaschentreher, N.: Waste Management in Germany 2013; German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature
Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); Berlin, 2012
3. Morscheck, G.; Nelles, M.: Waste management in Germany – Status and Development, In: Proceedings of the 5th Internationale
Conference on Environmental Technology and Knowledge Transfer (ICET), 15.-16. Mai 2014, Hefei, Anhui, China, ISBN 978-3-86009-
411-2 (05/2014).
4. Nelles, M.; Grünes, J.; Rensberg, N.; Schüch, A.: Utilization of Organic Waste and residues in Germany, In: Proceedings of the 5th
International Conference on Environmental Technology and Knowledge Transfer (ICET), 15.-16. May 2014, Hefei, Anhui, China, p. 22-28,
ISBN 978-3-86009-411-2, (05/2014).
5. Nelles, M.; Wu, K.: Waste Management in Germany – Mechanical-biological Treatment and Energy Recovery, DEG-Workshop
„Sustainable Waste Management in Germany und Shenyang, China“;21. November 2011 in Hefei (11/2011).
6. Nelles, M; Morscheck, G.: Circular Economy – Germany on the way to a sustainable Waste Management System; IE EXPO Shanghai am
13. Mai 2013 (5/2013).
... Furthermore, Germany has implemented a waste management strategy during the last two decades that relies on closed cycles and distributes the responsibility of disposing of items to producers and distributors. It has heightened people's awareness of the need to segregate waste, prompted the implementation of novel waste disposal methods, and bolstered recycling capabilities [17]. A 65% waste recycling target was announced by government through the Circular Economy Act of 2012. ...
... In Germany, the government has a piece of legislation named the German Closed Cycle Management Act, which aims to transform waste handling into resource management. Implementing closed cycle management nonetheless benefits ecosystems, additionally, yielding economic returns [17]. The objective of the Scottish Government is to transform Scotland into a society that produces no waste and operates on a circular economy model. ...
... Nevertheless, there is significant variation in the quality of effective waste separation by the people [61]. Germany has implemented a comprehensive waste management system that encompasses waste reduction, composting, recycling, and dumping in landfills [17,57]. Furthermore, in Germany and South Africa, manufacturers and users of packaging materials are obligated to adhere to the standards of EPR, which entails the industry taking responsibility for the recycling and recovery of packaging waste [31,56]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This review provides a detailed analysis of zero waste (ZW) initiatives, focusing on national policies, strategies, and case studies aimed at minimising municipal solid waste (MSW). It evaluates the environmental, social, and economic impacts of waste and explores the transition from conventional landfill reliance to sustainable waste management practices. Key ZW approaches, including circular economy frameworks and extended producer responsibility (EPR), are examined through case studies from countries such as China, Germany, and the United States. The review highlights advancements in waste-to-energy (WTE) technologies, the development of zero waste cities, and the critical role of policies in achieving significant MSW reduction. Additionally, it identifies key challenges such as infrastructure gaps and regulatory weaknesses and offers practical solutions to overcome these barriers. This study serves as a valuable resource for policymakers aiming to implement effective waste reduction strategies and enhance sustainable waste management systems globally.
... With the prosperity of economy and the continuous development of science and technology, a large amount of greenhouse gases are emitted in the manufacturing process, which seriously affects the stability of global climate and environmental ecological security [1]. In order to mitigate the greenhouse effect and curb the continued deterioration of the environment, countries or regions have successively issued strict international environmental protection laws and relevant laws and regulations, such as Germany's "Closed Circulation of Materials and Waste Management Law" [2], Japan's "Kyoto Protocol" [3,4], China's "Carbon Emission Trading Management Measures (Trial)" [5]. Although these relevant environmental protection laws and regulations have played a significant role in increasing the low-carbon and environmental awareness of governments, enterprises and consumers around the world [6], global greenhouse gas emissions have not been significantly reduced [7]. ...
... In this study, we tried to address the following questions: (1) In the context of carbon trading, what is the impact of consumers' low-carbon preference and low-carbon cost coefficient on LCSC decision-making? (2) What are the differences between retailer fairness concerns and fairness neutrality in LCSC decision-making? (3) How do different levels of manufacturer CSR affect LCSC decisions? ...
Article
Full-text available
In the context of environmental deterioration and people’s growing environmental protection awareness, governments or regions have put forward corresponding carbon emission reduction policies. Among them, the carbon trading mechanism, as an effective means to promote enterprises to implement emission reduction measures, plays a crucial role in regulating enterprise behavior and promoting social sustainable development. Since various industries and sectors support each other in social and economic development, it is more reasonable to study the carbon emission reduction optimization decisions of society and enterprises from the perspective of the supply chain. To achieve the carbon reduction target of the supply chain system, manufacturing enterprises usually need to incur additional costs to invest in emission reduction technologies, and retail enterprises also need to conduct low-carbon publicity to increase product market share. On one hand, considering the impact of the government’s emission reduction constraints and consumers’ low-carbon preferences, manufacturers will take corporate social responsibility (CSR) into consideration to enhance product competitiveness. On the other hand, smaller retailers are more concerned about being treated fairly than about their own profits due to the extra cost of low-carbon advertising. In this paper, considering the background of carbon trading, the manufacturer’s CSR and retailer’s fairness concern behavior are introduced into the decision-making process of the low-carbon supply chain (LCSC), and the relevant emission reduction decision-making model is constructed by using Stackelberg game theory and backward derivation method. Through comparative analysis of relevant parameters, members’ profits and utilities, this paper focuses on the influence of CSR and fairness concerns on system decision-making. The results show that the optimal way for LCSC decision-making is to cooperate with fair-concerned retailers and manufacturers with CSR. When manufacturers consider social responsibility within a certain range and retailers bear part of the cost of social responsibility as followers, it can not only effectively improve the emission reduction level of the supply chain and the profits of each entity, but also help to increase the enthusiasm of each entity for carbon emission reduction and the overall social welfare.
... The main techniques used for waste management according to the waste type to estimate the amount of waste [35] . Waste management strategies were investigated to identify the main barriers of waste collection and recycling, the study indicated that infrastructure facilities for incineration (energy recovery), mechanical and biological treatment of waste are sufficient to handle generated waste, but the main problems reside in the varying prices of recycled waste, mis-integration between public and private sector and financial problems to support waste treatment sector [36] . ...
Article
Full-text available
p>Developing countries in North Africa and the Middle East have a low rate of waste recovery (15%) compared with developed countries (90%). The study aims to investigate the main reasons behind this lag. A literature review was conducted to design a questionnaire for scrutinizing waste management plans applied during design, waste mitigation techniques during construction and government support of this sector. The results indicated that there is lack of updated regulations, 74% of stakeholders still sending waste for landfill disposal, whereas other waste hierarchy processes (recycling and reduction) accounts only 7% and weak support of government. In conclusion, the current situation of waste management is not effective, so quick actions from both government and stakeholders were proposed to improve waste management practices.</p
... The implementation of effective solid waste management practices is crucial for the transition towards a circular economy, and higher education institutions play a key role in knowledge and innovation to address these challenges in a comprehensive manner (Vallet-Bellmunt et al., 2023). Improving waste management can reduce environmental degradation, promote conservation and use of natural resources in the context of sustainable development (Nelles et al., 2016;Malinauskaite et al., 2013;Hidalgo et al., 2019). This aligns with international development agendas, in particular the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, specifically SDG 12, which promotes sustainable consumption and production patterns (Abubakar et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the paradigmatic transition in solid waste management among Ecuadorian university students, evaluating the evolution from the conventional linear model to a circular economy approach in higher education institutions. Theoretical Framework: Solid waste represents a global challenge that affects the entire population. The circular economy is presented as a comprehensive solution to minimize waste generation, promoting recycling and reuse, as well as supporting local development and reducing pollution. Method: A quantitative and qualitative analysis was adopted through a descriptive study that evaluated the results of a survey of 367 students, highlighting environmental awareness in solid waste management to enrich environmental education. Results and Discussion: The data showed a positive perception of waste management, with 83% of respondents rating it as good to excellent. This suggests an increase in university environmental awareness and reflects the impl
... The implementation of effective solid waste management practices is crucial for the transition towards a circular economy, and higher education institutions play a key role in knowledge and innovation to address these challenges in a comprehensive manner (Vallet-Bellmunt et al., 2023). Improving waste management can reduce environmental degradation, promote conservation and use of natural resources in the context of sustainable development (Nelles et al., 2016;Malinauskaite et al., 2013;Hidalgo et al., 2019). This aligns with international development agendas, in particular the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, specifically SDG 12, which promotes sustainable consumption and production patterns (Abubakar et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the paradigmatic transition in solid waste management among Ecuadorian university students, evaluating the evolution from the conventional linear model to a circular economy approach in higher education institutions. Theoretical Framework: Solid waste represents a global challenge that affects the entire population. The circular economy is presented as a comprehensive solution to minimize waste generation, promoting recycling and reuse, as well as supporting local development and reducing pollution. Method: A quantitative and qualitative analysis was adopted through a descriptive study that evaluated the results of a survey of 367 students, highlighting environmental awareness in solid waste management to enrich environmental education. Results and Discussion: The data showed a positive perception of waste management, with 83% of respondents rating it as good to excellent. This suggests an increase in university environmental awareness and reflects the implementation of sustainable management programs in institutions. Research Implications: The study proposes that institutions act as agents of change to promote sustainable practices in waste management. Originality/Value: This research elucidates the paradigmatic transition in solid waste management in higher education institutions in Ecuador, offering a particular perspective on the adoption of circular economy models in the Latin American educational context.
... However, these outdated methods have caused great harm to the ecological environment and public health (Mohan et al., 2006). To mitigate these issues, authorities are now prioritizing waste classification, a process that categorizes, collects, transports, and treats waste for resource recovery, minimizing pollution and enhancing resource utilization (Goel et al., 2023;Honma & Hu, 2021;Nelles et al., 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
China’s rapid economic growth and urbanization led to a surge in waste generation, prompting the government to implement policies for a sustainable waste management industry. This results in a complex policy system involving multiple objectives, instruments, and policymakers. To systematically understand the complex dynamics of waste management policies in China and analyze the roles and collaborations among policymakers, this study proposes a double-level analytical framework. Firstly, the social network analysis is employed to investigate the cooperation network among policy makers, providing insights into the evolving relationships between different governmental departments. Additionally, a joint analysis utilizing the Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic model is conducted to quantify the synergy between policy objectives and instruments, offering a comprehensive view of policy content evolution. The analysis of 124 national waste management policies from 2000 to 2023 reveals that: (1) Joint policy formulation has become dominant across different stages, indicating strengthened cooperation between policy makers. (2) The evolution of policy objective is “Improve Legislation and Institutional Systems—Reduction, Recycling, Harmlessness—Balanced development”. (3) Policies have primarily relied on command type instruments, followed by social type, and least economic type instruments. Based on the results, the government should explore more flexible and incentive-oriented policies, including both social and economic types. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, offering managerial guidance and decision support for multi-departmental and sustainable waste management practices.
... Smol et al. 2020),(Antikainen et al. 2018),(Parida et al. 2019),(De los Rios and Charnley 2017),(Hobson et al. 2018),(Kinnunen and Kaksonen 2019),(Jarre et al. 2020) 4. Plastic Waste Plastic waste, Recycling rate, Waste hierarchy, Packaging, Secondary raw material, Plastic, Microplastic, Waste, Reusable plastic (Thiounn and Smith 2020),,(Vollmer et al. 2020),(Zhang et al. 2021), (Idumah and Nwuzor 2019), (Faraca and Astrup 2019),(Borrelle et al. 2020) 5. Waste Management Management of waste, Waste disposal, E-waste management, Waste handling, Waste reduction, Recycling, Solid waste, Sustainability, Reuse(You et al. 2020),(Nanda and Berruti 2021),(Mian et al. 2017),,(Das et al. 2019),(Zorpas 2020),(Rhyner et al. 2020),(Minelgaitė and Liobikienė 2019), ...
Article
Full-text available
To develop a circular economy (CE) and protect the environment, waste recycling (WR) is crucial. This study examines WR research conducted over the past two decades to identify the most significant advancements and promising areas for future research. The following challenges were handled through text mining, content, and bibliometrics analysis: How has CE influenced the evolution of WR research? What are the CE’s most important WR research trends and themes? What directions could future research on WR take regarding the CE transition? Using 1118 articles from the Scopus database journal, bibliometric networks were made and analyzed. Hence, five critical CE-related problems needing further research were recognized: waste recycling is the first cluster, followed by technology, the CE transformation, plastic waste, and waste management (WM). Examining WM and inclusive waste reduction practices and their distinct highlight patterns may impact future research fields and serve as a transitional tool to CE (which aims to minimize waste generation). Forthcoming research targets contain waste reduction and incorporation of WR into the CE framework.
... Waste recycling is a key aspect of sustainable development, green chemistry [33,34] and circular economy [35,36]. Numerous industries have effectively incorporated waste usage into their processes, such as the production of pigments [37], materials for wastewater treatment [38][39][40][41], and various building materials including gypsum [42,43], binders [9,44], building blocks [45][46][47][48][49], and composite materials [50][51][52][53]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A method has been developed for separating a mixture of calcium, magnesium and sodium sulfates obtained through the interaction of sulfuric acid and waste from the water purification process generated by using membrane filters. The primary goal of this method is to extract gypsum and produce gypsum‐based binders. Patterns were identified regarding how various types, ratio and quantities of additives: blast furnace slag, granite screenings, portland cement, electric steel smelting slag affect the water‐gypsum ratio, strength properties, and water resistance of high‐strength gypsum binders. It was found that adding a single‐component additive specifically to enhance water resistance does not significantly impact these properties. Complex additives have been developed based on Portland cement, granulated blast furnace slag, electric furnace slag, expanded clay dust, and granite screenings of various fractions. These additives are designed to maximize the water resistance of high‐strength gypsum binder based on synthetic calcium sulfate dihydrate. As a result, the water resistance coefficient increased from 0.45 to 0.52. Additionally, a technological block diagram of the process has been proposed.
Waste Management in Germany 2013; German Federal Ministry for the Environment
  • A Jaron
  • N Flaschentreher
Jaron, A. and Flaschentreher, N.: Waste Management in Germany 2013; German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); Berlin, 2012
Waste Management in Germany – Mechanical-biological Treatment and Energy Recovery
  • M Nelles
  • K Wu
Nelles, M.; Wu, K.: Waste Management in Germany – Mechanical-biological Treatment and Energy Recovery, DEG-Workshop " Sustainable Waste Management in Germany und Shenyang, China " ;21. November 2011 in Hefei (11/2011).
Utilization of Organic Waste and residues in Germany
  • M Nelles
  • J Grünes
  • N Rensberg
  • A Schüch
Nelles, M.; Grünes, J.; Rensberg, N.; Schüch, A.: Utilization of Organic Waste and residues in Germany, In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Environmental Technology and Knowledge Transfer (ICET), 15.-16. May 2014, Hefei, Anhui, China, p. 22-28, ISBN 978-3-86009-411-2, (05/2014).
Circular Economy – Germany on the way to a sustainable Waste Management System; IE EXPO Shanghai am 13
  • M Nelles
  • G Morscheck
Nelles, M; Morscheck, G.: Circular Economy – Germany on the way to a sustainable Waste Management System; IE EXPO Shanghai am 13. Mai 2013 (5/2013).
Waste management in Germany -Status and Development
  • G Morscheck
  • M Nelles
Morscheck, G.; Nelles, M.: Waste management in Germany -Status and Development, In: Proceedings of the 5th Internationale Conference on Environmental Technology and Knowledge Transfer (ICET), 15.-16. Mai 2014, Hefei, Anhui, China, ISBN 978-3-86009-411-2 (05/2014).
  • A Jaron
  • N Flaschentreher
Jaron, A. and Flaschentreher, N.: Waste Management in Germany 2013;
Waste Management in Germany -Mechanical-biological Treatment and Energy Recovery, DEG-Workshop "Sustainable Waste Management in Germany und Shenyang, China";21
  • M Nelles
  • K Wu
Nelles, M.; Wu, K.: Waste Management in Germany -Mechanical-biological Treatment and Energy Recovery, DEG-Workshop "Sustainable Waste Management in Germany und Shenyang, China";21. November 2011 in Hefei (11/2011).