Content uploaded by Alison Mary Warnock
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Alison Mary Warnock on Nov 09, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
New articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Honey:
A Therapeutic Agent for Disorders of the
Skin
Pauline McLoone1, Afolabi
Oluwadun2, Mary Warnock3, Lorna
Fyfe3
1Department of Biomedical Sciences,
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev
University, Astana, Kazakhstan;
2Department of Medical Microbiology and
Parasitology Olabisi Onabanjo University,
Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria; 3Dietetics,
Nutrition and Biological Sciences, Queen
Margaret University, Musselburgh, East
Lothian, Scotland, United Kingdom
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online)
DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
Abstract
Problems with conventional treatments for a range of dermatological disorders have led scientists to search for new compounds
of therapeutic value. Efforts have included the evaluation of natural products such as honey. Manuka honey, for example, has
been scientifically recognised for its anti-microbial and wound healing properties and is now used clinically as a topical treatment
for wound infections. In this review, scientific evidence for the effectiveness of honey in the treatment of wounds and other skin
conditions is evaluated. A plethora of in vitro studies have revealed that honeys from all over the world have potent anti-
microbial activity against skin relevant microbes. Moreover, a number of in vitro studies suggest that honey is able to modulate
the skin immune system. Clinical research has shown honey to be efficacious in promoting the healing of partial thickness burn
wounds while its effectiveness in the treatment of non-burn acute wounds and chronic wounds is conflicted. Published research
investigating the efficacy of honey in the treatment of other types of skin disorders is limited. Nevertheless, positive effects have
been reported, for example, kanuka honey from New Zealand was shown to have therapeutic value in the treatment of rosacea.
Anti-carcinogenic effects of honey have also been observed in vitro and in a murine model of melanoma. It can be concluded
that honey is a biologically active and clinically interesting substance but more research is necessary for a comprehensive
understanding of its medicinal value in dermatology.
Keywords: dermatology, honey, skin cancer, wound healing
Honey:
A Therapeutic Agent for Disorders of the
Skin
Pauline McLoone1, Afolabi
Oluwadun2, Mary Warnock3, Lorna
Fyfe3
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, School
of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana,
Kazakhstan; 2Department of Medical
Microbiology and Parasitology Olabisi
Onabanjo University, Sagamu, Ogun State,
Nigeria; 3Dietetics, Nutrition and Biological
Sciences, Queen Margaret University,
Musselburgh, East Lothian, Scotland, United
Kingdom
Commentary
Historically, honey has been recognised around
the world for its healing properties with records of its
therapeutic use dating back to 2000 B.C. The ancient
Greeks and Egyptians, for example, used honey to treat
skin wounds and burns by applying topically on the
skin.1 Honey has been reported to ameliorate a broad
array of diseases but the focus of this review is on the
therapeutic properties of honey in the treatment of
disorders of the skin.
Traditional medicine in numerous countries
around the world has described honey as efficacious in
the treatment of a range of skin disorders. In Malaysian
tradition, honey is used to treat furuncles, carbuncles,
diabetic wounds and burns. Persian traditional medicine
documented honey as effective in the treatment of
wounds, eczema, and inflammation.2,3 In Ayurvedic
medicine, a traditional medicine native to the Indian
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
subcontinent, honey is used to treat cuts and wounds,
eczema, dermatitis, burns, skin diseases and Fournier’s
gangrene.4-6 Similarly, Quranic medicine in Pakistan
recorded honey combined with cinnamon powder as a
treatment for pustules, eczema, ringworm and a variety
of other skin diseases and in Burkina Faso, Africa, it has
been reported that indigenous people use honey as a
skin cleansing agent and as a treatment for measles
rash.7,8 The uses of honey in traditional medicine are
still significant today, especially, when we consider the
fact that most of the population of developing countries
presently rely on indigenous medicine as their source of
primary health care.9 Honey has also been used
extensively as an ingredient in cosmetic skin care
products both in the past and present day.5,10
In clinical practice today, manuka honey
produced by honey bees (Apis mellifera) feeding on the
manuka tree (Leptospermum scoparium) in New
Zealand is used topically in the management of wound
infections.11 It has been approved for clinical use in
Australia, New Zealand, Europe, United States of
America, Canada and Hong Kong and products include
γ irradiated honey in gels, ointments and impregnated
dressings. Revamil honey is another medical grade
honey commonly used in clinical practice for wound
care.12 It is produced by manufacturers in the
Netherlands in collaboration with the University of
Wageningen and the Academic Medical Centre,
Amsterdam. The manufacturers have disclosed that the
honey is produced in greenhouses but further details
about the origin of the honey have not been revealed.
The skin healing ability of honey has been
attributed to its antimicrobial properties, its ability to
modulate the skin’s immune system and promote tissue
repair.13,14 This review explores clinical and scientific
research investigating the efficacy of honey in the
treatment of wounds and a variety of other skin
disorders. A principle aim was to use the scientific
literature to evaluate the potential efficacy of honey in
the treatment of a range of dermatological disorders.
Methods
The databases Pubmed, Medline and
ScienceDirect were used to carry out a comprehensive
search of the scientific literature on the effects of honey
in the treatment of skin disorders including wounds.
Some of the key search terms used in combination were
“honey” “antimicrobial activity” “skin immune system”
“skin disorders” “wound healing” “seborrheic
dermatitis” “atopic dermatitis” “psoriasis” “rosacea”
“acne” “pityriasis versicolor” “cutaneous leishmaniasis”
“skin cancer” “ Kazakhstan” and “Central Asia”.
Relevant in vitro and in vivo studies were selected and
we also searched the reference list of included papers to
ensure that no important papers were omitted. Texts in
English, published between 1990 and 2016 were
included.
Results
The Efficacy of Honey in the Treatment of
Skin Wounds
The ability of honey to aid the healing of skin
wounds is the most widely researched aspect of honey
as a therapeutic agent to date. A plethora of in vitro and
in vivo studies have been performed.
The Efficacy of Honey in the Treatment of
Skin Wounds: In Vitro Studies
In vitro studies have revealed that honey from
diverse floral origins can kill a wide range of wound
pathogens, including; methicillin resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus
aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and
Acinetobacter baumannii.15-18 As an example, the work
of Cooper et al, (2002) demonstrated that manuka and
pasture honey from New Zealand were active against 17
strains of P. aeruginosa isolated from infected burns
with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) below
10%.19 The authors concluded that these honeys have
the potential to be effective treatments for burns
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
infected with P. aeruginosa. Also, Cooper et al (2014)
later demonstrated the ability of medihoney to disrupt
the structure and inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa
biofilms grown in vitro.20 As well as killing microbes,
studies have shown that sub-lethal concentrations of
honey can reduce microbial pathogenicity, for example,
Kronda et al (2013) demonstrated that sub-lethal
concentrations of manuka honey reduced siderophore
production, a virulence factor that scavenges iron for
bacterial growth, in strains of P. aeruginosa.21 Even
more remarkable are the in vitro findings that honey can
reverse antimicrobial resistance. Jenkins and Cooper
(2012) reported that manuka honey and oxacillin
worked synergistically to inhibit the growth of MRSA
and that manuka honey reversed oxacillin resistance in
MRSA in vitro.22
Table 1. Honey as a therapeutic agent for skin disorders;
Summary of the key in vitro findings
Importantly, studies have also shown that
honey from a variety of sources can modulate
immunological parameters related to the skin immune
system.23 For example, in vitro, honey has been shown
to stimulate cytokine production by skin cells such as
keratinocytes and other immune cells such as
monocytes.24,25 It has been proposed that increased
cytokine production in an early wound could enhance
wound healing because cytokines such as TNF-α and
IL-6 play an important role in the early wound healing
process. Additionally, some studies have shown that
honey or its extracts can down regulate the production
of cellular molecules such as matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs) and reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs) that
may contribute to excessive inflammation in the chronic
wound.26,27 It has been suggested that the
immunomodulatory properties of honey may contribute
to enhanced tissue repair or reduce chronic
inflammation in the wound, leading to enhanced
healing.
As well as its antimicrobial and
immunomodulatory properties, honey has been shown
to promote re-epithelialisation and angiogenesis in in
vitro models of wound healing. Ranzato et al (2012)
demonstrated that acacia, buckwheat and manuka
honey, purchased at an apiculture centre in Okayamo,
Japan, increased re-epithelialisation rates in scratch
wounds induced in keratinocyte (HaCaT) monolayers.28
Furthermore, the mechanism was shown to be due to
honey induced activation of pathways that regulate cell
locomotion and cell proliferation. Barui et al, (2013)
demonstrated that a honey alginate fibrous matrix
induced faster re-epithelialisation than an alginate only
matrix in a keratinocyte (HaCaT) wound model; E-
cadherin protein was enhanced in the honey alginate
model which may have promoted increased cell to cell
adhesion.29 Rossiter et al, (2010) reported that the
medicinal honey Activon containing 100% manuka
honey, the honey based ointment Mesitran as well as a
supermarket honey (Rowse) promoted angiogenic
activity in a rat aortic ring assay in vitro.30
In conclusion, in vitro studies have revealed
that honey has some remarkable scientific properties
that, plausibly, could promote the healing of wounds.
The Efficacy of Honey in the Treatment of
Skin Wounds: In Vivo Studies
Ideally, a wound will heal early but sometimes
wound healing is delayed and this can be the result of
systemic disease, malnutrition and infection of the
wound leading to excessive inflammation. Indeed,
excessive infiltration of neutrophils has been associated
with deficient wound healing.31 Micro-organisms can
sometimes attach to the wound bed and form a biofilm
which is disruptive to the healing process. Wound
infections exacerbate illness, cause anxiety and increase
patient morbidity and mortality. Surgical wound
infections lengthen hospital stay and chronic wounds
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
require considerably more dressings. Hence, effective
prevention and management of wound infections will
impact positively on both patient health and cost.
Table 2. Honey as a therapeutic agent for skin disorders;
Summary of the key in vivo findings
There are a plethora of in vivo studies
investigating the efficacy of honey in the treatment of
wounds;32-55 many of the findings are controversial.
However, a recent Cochrane based review by Jull et al,
(2015)56 concluded that there is quality evidence that
honey heals partial thickness burn wounds more quickly
than conventional treatments and infected post-
operative wounds more effectively than gauze or
antiseptics. It was concluded that other studies
comparing honey with conventional methods in wound
healing were of insufficient quality to form any
definitive conclusions.
Larger, well designed, double blind, clinical
studies are required for a fuller understanding of the
efficacy of honey in the treatment of different types of
wounds. The mechanism of the skin healing properties
of honey in relation to burn wounds is not fully
understood but may, at least partially, be due to the
antioxidant content of honey. There is evidence for free
radical activity and reduced antioxidant scavenging
capacity in burn wounds leading to oxidative stress.57
Honeys that are rich in antioxidants are likely to
increase the antioxidant capacity of burn wounds and
mop up free radicals leading to reduced oxidative
stress.58 Of course, the antimicrobial and
immunomodulatory properties of honey may also
positively encourage the wound healing process in burn
wounds.
Mode of administration and combination
therapy with other agents such as antibiotics or other
natural products could be considered. Techniques such
as checkerboard and time kill studies are currently being
used to determine the synergistic effects of
antimicrobial agents (personal communication;
Oluwadun A. & Akinduti P., Olabisi Onabanjo
University).
The Efficacy of Honey in the Treatment of
Other Disorders of the Skin
In Vitro Studies
In vitro studies have revealed that honey can
inhibit the growth of a range of dermatologically
important microbes. As well as inhibition of microbes
responsible for wound infections, honey has been shown
to inhibit the growth of dermatophytes a cause of tinea
infections, Candida albicans a cause of cutaneous
candidiasis and Propionibacterium acnes a cause of
acne.16,59-61 Many studies have demonstrated the
antimicrobial effects of honey from a variety of sources
against S. aureus. As well as wound infections S. aureus
is an important cause of furuncles, styes and impetigo
and super-infection with S. aureus is common in atopic
dermatitis.62` Research should continue to investigate
the in vitro effects of honey against other
dermatologically important microbes such as
Malassezia species, human papilloma virus and Bacillus
oleronius.
Some skin disorders such as contact dermatitis,
atopic dermatitis and psoriasis have been classified as
immune mediated skin disorders. Although the
aetiology of the majority of immune mediated skin
disorders are not fully understood the immune system is
believed to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of
the disease. Such disorders commonly respond to
treatment with immunomodulating agents such as
corticosteroids or ultraviolet radiation therapy.
Recently, in vitro studies have revealed that honey is
able to modulate the immune system, for example, a
study by Majtan et al, (2010) demonstrated that acacia
honey from Slovakia stimulated TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-1β
and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) mRNA
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
expression by human primary keratinocytes isolated
from human foreskin.24 Subsequently, Majtan et al,
(2013) reported that an aqueous extract of fir honeydew
honey from Slovakia inhibited TNF-α induced matrix
metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) protein and mRNA
production by human keratinocytes (HaCaT) cells.27
Since the role of the immune system in skin disorders is
complex, it is difficult to infer what effects honey will
have in the treatment of immune mediated skin
disorders without further investigation. It is likely that
both the origin of the honey and the microenvironment
of the skin disorder will influence clinical outcome.
Clearly, more research is necessary for a better
understanding of the immunomodulatory properties of
honey and their relevance for skin disease.
The Efficacy of Honey in the Treatment of
Other Disorders of the Skin: In Vivo Studies
The majority of clinical studies performed to
date have investigated the efficacy of honey in the
treatment of skin wounds. There is a paucity of clinical
studies investigating the effects of honey on other types
of skin disorders; however, some of the studies that
have been carried out have produced positive results.
Al-Waili (2001) reported a remarkable improvement of
symptoms in patients with seborrheic dermatitis (n=30)
following topical application of a diluted crude honey
(90%).63 The same researcher, later reported that a
honey mixture containing natural honey of multi-floral
origin from Lootah Farm, Al-Theed City, United Arab
Emirates, olive oil and beeswax (1:1:1) markedly
improved the symptoms of patients with atopic
dermatitis (n=21) and psoriasis (n=18).64 Some of the
psoriatic and atopic dermatitis patients received a honey
mixture treatment in combination with corticosteroids
and this allowed the concentration of corticosteroid to
be reduced over time without exacerbation of
symptoms. Al-Waili, (2003) suggested that the anti-
microbial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties
of honey may explain the observed therapeutic effects.
The same honey mixture was found to cure the
symptoms of the fungal skin infections pityriasis
versicolor in 79% of patients (n=14), tinea cruris in 71%
of patients (n=14) and tinea corporis in 62% of patients
(n=8).65 In 2005, Al-Waili reported that the same honey
mixture significantly reduced mean lesion scores in
infants with diaper dermatitis (n=12); the presence of C.
albicans was found to be reduced in some patients
treated with the honey mixture.66 In a small study
(n=16) by Al-Waili (2004) it was reported that honey
was more effective than acyclovir in the treatment of
patients with labial and genital herpes simplex lesions,
suggesting that honey could potentially be effective in
the treatment of oral herpes simplex lesions.67
Table 3. Studies investigating the efficacy of honey in
the treatment of skin disorders (excluding wounds)
Acasia honey (Yamada bee farm, Japan) and
the bee product Brazilian green propolis (BPE) have
also been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of
tinea infections in vivo.68 Two hundred and forty two
Congolese school children with either tinea capitis or
pityriasis versicolor were treated with either 2%
Miconazole (positive control), BPE (100mg/ml or
50mg/ml), acasia honey or Vaseline. The results showed
that acasia honey, BPE at both concentrations and
Miconazole significantly improved erythema,
desquamation and pruritis in tinea patients in
comparison to Vaseline.
Rosacea is an inflammatory skin disorder,
characterised by facial redness, papules, pustules and
telangiectasia. The bacterium Bacillus oleronius isolated
from the Dermodex folliculorum mite has been
implicated in the aetiology of the disease. A recent
study by Braithwaite et al (2015) has shown that kanuka
honey from New Zealand was efficacious in the
treatment of rosacea.69 Their study included 138
participants with a diagnosis of rosacea and a Global
Assessment of Rosacea Severity Score (IGA-RSS) of ≥
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
2.69. Sixty nine participants were treated with topical
Honevo (90% kanuka honey and 10% glycerine) for 8
weeks. The other 69 participants were treated with the
control cream Cetomacrogol, a moisturising cream,
commonly used as a vehicle for delivering topical
medications. The results showed that 34.3% in the
Honevo group and 17.4% in the control group had a ≥ 2
improvement in the IGA-RSS at week 8. The
researchers concluded that Honevo is an effective
treatment for rosacea and that future research should
compare Honevo with other conventional treatments,
such as topical Metronidazole and Azelaic cream, both
of which have limited efficacy. The mechanisms of the
therapeutic properties of kanuka honey in the treatment
of rosacea are not fully understood but both the anti-
bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties have been
considered.
A recent study involving 136 participants with
acne (Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) score of ≥
2.68 aged between 16 and 40 years was carried out to
investigate the efficacy of topical kanuka honey in the
treatment of acne.70 Sixty eight of the participants were
randomised to a treatment regime which involved
applying Protex, a trilocarbon-based antibacterial soap
twice daily for 12 weeks whilst the other 68 participants
applied the anti-bacterial soap treatment followed by
application of Honevo directly after washing off the
bacterial soap, twice daily for 12 weeks. The results
demonstrated that 4 out of 53 patients (7.6%) in the
honey treated group and 1 out of 53 (1.9 %) patients in
the anti-bacterial soap only treated group had a ≥ 2
improvement in IGA score. The authors concluded that
there was no evidence that adding Honevo to standard
anti-bacterial soap treatment for acne is more
efficacious than anti-bacterial soap alone. The authors
however did raise concerns about treatment compliance
due to the young age of many of the participants and the
high rate of withdrawal. Medical grade kanuka honey
has also been tested for its efficacy in the treatment of
eczema and psoriasis.71,72 No evidence of effectiveness
in the treatment of eczema above that of an aqueous
control cream was reported. The study involved 15
participants with bilateral eczematous lesions on the
limbs; medical grade kanuka honey was applied to a
representative lesion on one side and aqueous cream BP
to the other, every night for 2 weeks. Aqueous cream is
not a recommended treatment for eczema and therefore
represented a negative control. The authors concluded
that their study did not demonstrate any evidence that
kanuka honey is an effective treatment for eczema,
however, the small sample size and incomplete blinding
were acknowledged as limitations of the study. The
same study design was also used to investigate the
efficacy of kanuka honey in the treatment of psoriasis.
The results showed that kanuka honey was of similar
efficacy to aqueous cream; a recommended treatment
for psoriasis but with lower efficacy than
corticosteroids. Medical grade kanuka honey has also
been tested for its efficacy in the treatment of cold sores
and compared with Acyclovir.73 The study showed that
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median healing time were
similar for honey and Acyclovir. However, limitations
of the study were that participant size was small with
only 15 patients; the authors proposed that a larger
clinical study should be conducted.
Naidoo et al (2011) tested the efficacy of
manuka honey as a prophylactic treatment for dermatitis
in a phase II randomised controlled trial involving
patients undergoing radiation therapy for breast
cancer.74 81 patients were enrolled in the study; 43 of
which were treated with manuka honey and 38 with
standard aqueous cream. The results showed that there
was a lower incidence of grade >2 dermatitis in the
patients treated with honey (37.2%) compared with
those treated with aqueous cream (57.8%). When >
grade 2 dermatitis did occur the duration was shorter in
the honey treated group in comparison to the group
treated with aqueous cream.
One study also investigated the therapeutic
value of honey in the treatment of cutaneous
leishmaniasis.75 In this study, 90 patients with cutaneous
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
leishmaniasis were allocated to a treatment regime; 45
patients were treated for 6 weeks with topical honey
soaked gauze twice daily and intra-lesional injection of
glucantime weekly. The other 45 patients were treated
with intra-lesional injection of glucantime only. By the
end of the treatment more patients had complete cure in
the glucantime only treated group (71%) than in the
glucantime and honey treated group (51.1%), suggesting
that the honey used in this study is not of therapeutic
value in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
The aforementioned studies investigating the
efficacy of honey in the treatment of other types of skin
disorders are relatively small scale and several of them
have been carried out by the same researcher,
nevertheless, they support the possibility that honey
may be therapeutic in the treatment of other types of
skin disorder such as fungal skin infections and
inflammatory skin conditions. Systematic reviews are
important for evidence based method and this approach
has been adopted by Jull et al (2015)56 to evaluate the
efficacy of honey in the treatment of wounds. Clinical
studies investigating the efficacy of honey in the
treatment of other types of skin disorders are more
limited and we have described all published findings
irrespective of the quality of the study design. It is
important that all future studies carried out follow
international standards for clinical trial reporting.
Undoubtedly, further research is necessary,
incorporating in vitro, animal and clinical studies to
determine the medical value of honey in the treatment
of a range of dermatological disorders. Even if honey is
found to be an ineffective treatment for certain skin
diseases such studies are important because the
knowledge will inform patients and clinicians
considering alternative therapies for dermatological
disorders.
Honey and Skin Cancer
Recently, Fernandez-Cabezudo et al, (2013)
reported that manuka honey could inhibit the
proliferation and induce apoptosis in three cancer cell
lines, one of which was the murine melanoma cell line
B16.F1.76 Additionally, Pichichero et al, (2010)
reported that acacia honey inhibited proliferation of
murine and human melanoma cells by inducing cell
cycle arrest at G0/G1.77 In vivo, a murine melanoma
tumour model treated with intravenous manuka honey
displayed a significant reduction in tumour growth.76
Some of the mice received co-administration of manuka
honey and the chemotherapeutic drug taxol and this
resulted in a significant inhibition of the growth of the
tumour and improved overall animal survival suggesting
that manuka honey, as well as having anti-tumourogenic
properties, may reduce chemotherapy induced toxicity.
No changes in haematological and chemical markers
were observed in the mice treated with intravenous
manuka honey suggesting that it is safe to administer
honey in this way. In another study, tualang honey from
Malaysia was shown to protect murine keratinocytes
(PAM 212 cells) in vitro from the immunomodulatory
and photocarcinogenic effects of UVB radiation.78 UVB
irradiated keratinocytes treated with honey exhibited
reduced expression of COX-2 and NF-κB activation in
comparison to UVB only treated cells. Furthermore,
UVB irradiated keratinocytes treated with tualang honey
displayed a marked reduction in DNA damage in the
form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 8-oxo-7, 8-
dihydro-2-deoxyguanosine compared with UVB
irradiated controls. Tualang honey may therefore be
able to protect the skin against the immunomodulatory
and photocarcinogenic effects of sunlight exposure.
The ability of honey to inhibit the proliferation
of tumour cells is thought to be due to the various
flavonoid and phenolic compounds present in honey.
Evidence for this comes from the work of Pichichero et
al, (2010; 2011) showing that chrysin, a flavanoid found
in acacia honey inhibited proliferation of melanoma
cells via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.77,79 Honey has
also been shown to regulate expression of p53, the
tumour suppressor protein and down regulate Bcl-2 an
anti-apoptotic protein, found at high levels in numerous
cancers.80 The anti-inflammatory effects of honey may
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
also contribute to its anti-carcinogenic properties,
particularly as inflammation has been shown to
contribute to the progression of cancer.81
The anti-carcinogenic properties of honey
observed to date are promising but more research is
necessary, particularly in vivo, for a fuller understanding
of the potential efficacy of honey in the treatment or
prevention of skin cancer.
Discussion
The ability of honey in vitro to kill skin
relevant microbes, alter microbial pathogenicity, reverse
antibiotic resistance, modulate immunological
parameters, promote tissue repair, inhibit tumour cell
growth and protect against UV induced DNA damage is
really quite remarkable considering it is a scientifically
unaltered, purely natural substance produced by bees. In
vitro studies have sparked excitement amongst
researchers about the therapeutic potential of honey for
clinical practice. Some of the properties observed in
vitro are particularly relevant today when the current
global crisis of antimicrobial drug resistance has
rendered many infectious diseases, including wound
infections, untreatable and malignant melanoma
incidence is increasing faster than any other cancer.82,83
Skin Cancer is also a significant problem in Central
Asian countries; in Kazakhstan for example, incidence
figures from the Ministry of Health (2013) show that
skin cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer
along with lung and breast cancer.84 Furthermore, a
particularly high incidence of basal cell carcinomas was
recorded around the Semipalatinsk nuclear testing site
in Kazakhstan.85
There are countless varieties of honey being
produced worldwide and some may have superior
healing abilities that are yet to be discovered. Central
Asia possesses a unique biodiversity with open steppe,
deserts and high mountains; honey production is
abundant in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and
Tajikistan. Beekeeping trailers enable honey producers
to reach diverse locations in the region, despite this, the
regions honeys have not been fully examined for
potential biomedical uses. Other local bee products,
such as propolis could also be investigated for their
medicinal value as research has demonstrated
antimicrobial, anti-carcinogenic and wound healing
properties.86-88 The development of locally produced
honeys into medical grade honeys suitable for use in
clinical practice could be economically advantageous
for the country concerned.
A recent review has highlighted that there is no
statistical monitoring on the prevalence of chronic
wounds in Kazakhstan and no approved protocols for
wound care.89 The authors described that wound care
products made from plant extracts have been developed
in Kazakhstan although they have not been officially
approved for clinical use. The review did not list honey
as a treatment used for wound care in Kazakhstan
despite its approved use in other parts of the world.
In conclusion, research has demonstrated that
the bioactive properties of honey and the aetiology of
skin diseases are complex and that there are
considerable gaps in our knowledge and understanding
of both. Innovative research that can maximally exploit
the bioactive properties of this natural substance may in
the future lead to the production of a medicinal product
that is highly valued in dermatology.
References
1. Molan PC. The antibacterial activity of honey: 1. The
nature of the antibacterial activity. Bee World. 1992;73(1):5-
28.
2. Barakhbah SASA. Honey in the Malay tradition. Malays J
Med Sci. 2007;14(1):106.
3. Sepehr S. The most important medicinal uses of honey
and its side effects in the book of the Canon by Avienna and in
the modern medical literature: A comparative study. J ApiProd
ApiMed Sci. 2010;2(1):43.
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
4. Deshpande SD KK. Indian honey as a medicine. J
ApiProd ApiMed Sci. 2010;2(1):45.
5. Ediriweera ER, Premarathna NY. Medicinal and cosmetic
uses of Bee's Honey - A review. Ayu. 2012;33(2):178-182.
6. Subrahmanyam M. Practical application of honey
dressing. Malays J Med Sci. 2007;14(1):103.
7. Marwat SK, Khan MA, Rehman F, Khan K. Medicinal u ses
of honey (Quranic medicine) and its bee flora from Dera Ismail
Khan District, KPK, Pakistan. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2013 ;26(2):307-
314.
8. Meda A, Lamien CE, Millogo J, Romito M, Nacoulma OG.
Therapeutic uses of honey and honeybee larvae in central
Burkina Faso. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;95(1):103-107.
9. WHO. WHO traditional medicine strategy 2014-2023.
2014. Accessed 15 Dec 2014, 2014.
10. Burlando B, Cornara L. Honey in dermatology and skin
care: a review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2013;12(4):306-313.
11. Irish J, Blair S, Carter DA. The antibacterial activity of
honey derived from Australian flora. PLoS One.
2011;6(3):e18229.
12. Kwakman PH, Te Velde AA, de Boer L, Vandenbroucke-
Grauls CM, Zaat SA. Two major medicinal honeys have different
mechanisms of bactericidal activity. PLoS One.
2011;6(3):e17709.
13. Majtan J. Honey: an immunomodulator in wound
healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(2):187-192.
14. Sherlock O, Dolan A, Athman R, et al. Comparison of the
antimicrobial activity of Ulmo honey from Chile and Manuka
honey against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC
Complement Altern Med. 2010;10:47.
15. Carnwath R, Graham EM, Reynolds K, Pollock PJ. The
antimicrobial activity of honey against common equ ine wound
bacterial isolates. Vet J. 2014;199(1):110-114.
16. McLoone P, Warnock M, Fyfe L. Honey: A realistic
antimicrobial for disorders of the skin. J Microbiol Immunol
Infect. 2016;49(2):161-167.
17. Schneider M, Coyle S, Warnock M, Gow I, Fyfe L. Anti -
microbial activity and composition of manuka and portobello
honey. Phytother Res. 2013;27(8):1162-1168.
18. Tan HT, Rahman RA, Gan SH, et al. The antibacterial
properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and
enteric microorganisms in comparison to manuka honey. BMC
Complement Altern Med. 2009;9:34.
19. Cooper RA, Halas E, Molan PC. The efficacy of hone y in
inhibiting strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from infected
burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002;23(6):366-370.
20. Cooper R, Jenkins L, Hooper S. Inhibition of biofilms of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Medihoney in vitro. J Wound Care.
2014;23(3):93-96, 98-100, 102 passim.
21. Kronda JM, Cooper RA, Maddocks SE. Manuka honey
inhibits siderophore production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J
Appl Microbiol. 2013;115(1):86-90.
22. Jenkins RE, Cooper R. Synergy between oxacillin and
manuka honey sensitizes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus to oxacillin. J Antimicrob C hemother. 2012;67(6):1405-
1407.
23. McLoone P, Warnock M, Fyfe L. Honey: an
immunomodulatory agent for disorders of the skin. Food Agric
Immunol. 2016;27(3):338-349.
24. Majtan J, Kumar P, Majtan T, Walls AF, Klaudiny J. Effect
of honey and its major royal jelly protein 1 on cytokine and
MMP-9 mRNA transcripts in human keratinocytes. Exp
Dermatol. 2010;19(8):e73-79.
25. Tonks AJ, Cooper RA, Jones KP, Blair S, Parton J, Tonks
A. Honey stimulates inflammatory cytokine production from
monocytes. Cytokine. 2003;21(5):242-247.
26. Ahmad A, Khan RA, Mesaik MA. A nti inflammatory effect
of natural honey on bovine thrombin-induced oxidative burst in
phagocytes. Phytother Res. 2009;23(6):801-808.
27. Majtan J, Bohova J, Garcia-V illalba R, et al. Fir honeydew
honey flavonoids inhibit TNF-alpha-induced MMP-9 expression
in human keratinocytes: a new action of honey in wound
healing. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013;305(7):619-627.
28. Ranzato E, Martinotti S, Burlando B. Epithelial
mesenchymal transition traits in honey-driven keratinocyte
wound healing: comparison among different honeys. Wound
Repair Regen. 2012;20(5):778-785.
29. Barui A, Mandal N, Majumder S, et al. Assessment of
molecular events during in vitro re-epithelialization under
honey-alginate matrix ambience. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol
Appl. 2013;33(6):3418-3425.
30. Rossiter K, Cooper AJ, Voegeli D, Lwaleed BA. Honey
promotes angiogeneic activity in the rat aortic ring assay. J
Wound Care. 2010;19(10):440, 442-446.
31. Diegelmann RF, E vans MC. Wound healing: an overview
of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci.
2004;9:283-289.
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
32. Bischofberger AS, Dart CM, Perkins NR, Kelly A, Jeffcott
L, Dart AJ. The effect of short- and long-term treatment with
manuka honey on second intention healing of contaminated and
noncontaminated wounds on the distal aspect of the forelimbs
in horses. Vet Surg. 2013;42(2):154-160.
33. Boekema BK, Pool L, Ulrich MM. The effect of a honey
based gel and silver sulphadiazine on bacterial infections of in
vitro burn wounds. Burns. 2013;39(4):754-759.
34. Gethin G, Cowman S. Manuka honey vs. hydrogel--a
prospective, open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
to compare desloughing efficacy and healing outcomes in
venous ulcers. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(3):466-474.
35. Gupta SS, Singh O, Bhagel PS, Moses S, Shukla S,
Mathur RK. Honey dressing versus silver sulfadiazene dressing
for wound hea ling in burn patients: a retrospective study. J
Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011;4(3):183-187.
36. Haidari M, Nazer MR, Ahmadinejad M, Almasi V,
Khorramabadi MS, Pournia Y. Honey in the treatment of
Fournier's gangrene as an adjuvant: a cross sectional study. J
Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(5):571-573.
37. Ingle R, Levin J, Polinder K. Wound healing with honey--
a randomised contr olled trial. S Afr Med J. 2006;96(9):831-
835.
38. Jull A, Walker N, Parag V, Molan P, Rodgers A.
Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for
venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):175 -182.
39. Khoo YT, Halim AS, Singh KK, Mohamad NA. Wound
contraction effects and antibacterial properties of Tualang
honey on full-thickness burn wounds in rats in comparison to
hydrofibre. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10:48.
40. Maghsoudi H, Salehi F, Khosrowshahi MK, Baghaei M,
Nasirzadeh M, Shams R. Comparison between topical honey
and mafenide acetate in treatment of burn wounds. Ann Burns
Fire Disasters. 2011;24(3):132-137.
41. Malik KI, Malik MA, Aslam A. Honey compared with silver
sulphadiazine in the treatment of superficial partial-thickness
burns. Int Wound J. 2010;7(5):413-417.
42. Mat Lazim N, Abdullah B, Salim R. The effect of Tualang
honey in enhancing post tonsillectomy healing process. An open
labelled prospective clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2013;77(4):457-461.
43. McIntosh CD, Thomson CE. Honey dressing versus
paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery. J Wound Care.
2006;15(3):133-136.
44. Nakajima Y, Nakano Y, Fuwano S, et al. Effects of three
types of Japanese honey on full-thickness wound in mice. Evid
Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013 :504537.
45. Sare JL. Leg ulcer management with topical medical
honey. Br J Community Nurs. 2008;13(9):S22, S24, S26
passim.
46. Shukrimi A, Sulaiman AR, Halim AY, Azril A. A
comparative study between honey and povidone iodine as
dressing solution for Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers. Med J
Malaysia. 2008;63(1):44-46.
47. Subrahmanyam M. Honey impregnated gauze versus
polyurethane film (OpSite) in the treatment of burns--a
prospective randomised study. Br J Plast Surg.
1993;46(4):322-323.
48. Subrahmanyam M. Honey-impregnated gauze versus
amniotic membrane in the treatment of burns. Burns.
1994;20(4):331-333.
49. Subrahmanyam M. Honey dressing versus boiled potato
peel in the treatment of burns: a prospective randomized
study. Burns. 1996;22(6):491-493.
50. Subrahmanyam M. A prospective randomised clinical and
histological study of superficial burn wound h ealing with honey
and silver sulfadiazine. Burns. 1998;24(2):157-161.
51. Subrahmanyam M. Early tangential excision and skin
grafting of moderate burns is superior to honey dressing: a
prospective randomised trial. Burns. 1999;25(8):729-731.
52. Tahmaz L, Erdemir F, Kibar Y, Cosar A, Yalcyn O.
Fournier's gangrene: report of thirty-three cases and a review
of the literature. Int J Urol. 2006;13(7):960-967.
53. Vijaya KK, Nishteswar K. Wound healing activity of
honey: A pilot study. Ayu. 2012;33(3):374-377.
54. Gethin G, Cowman S. Case series of use of Manuka
honey in leg ulceration. Int Wound J. 2005;2(1):10-15.
55. Zerm R. Topical honey for diabetic foot ulcers. Dtsch
Arztebl Int. 2013;110(21):373.
56. Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Deshpande
S, Walker N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:Cd005083.
57. Al-Jawad FH, Sah ib AS, Al-Kaisy AA. Role of antioxidants
in the treatment of burn lesions. Ann Burns Fire Disasters.
2008;21(4):186-191.
58. Henriques A, Jackson S, Cooper R, Burton N. Free radical
production and quenching in honeys with wound healing
potential. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(4):773-777.
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
59. Ansari MJ, Al-Ghamdi A, Usmani S, et al. Effect of jujube
honey on Candida albicans growth and biofilm formation. Arch
Med Res. 2013;44(5):352-360.
60. Brady NF, Molan PC, Harfoot CG. The Sensitivity of
Dermatophytes to the Antimicrobial Activity of Manuka Honey
and Other Honey. Pharm Phar macol Commun. 1996;2(10):471-
473.
61. Wu Q. Antimicrobial effect of manuka honey and kanuka
honey alone and in combination with the bioactives against the
growth of Propionibacterium acnes ATCC 6919 . New Zealand,
Massey University; 2011.
62. Ong PY. Recurrent MRSA skin infections in atopic
dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol . In practice. 2014;2(4):396-
399.
63. Al-Waili NS. Therapeutic and prophylactic effects of
crude honey on chronic seborrheic dermatitis and dandruff. Eur
J Med Res. 2001;6(7):306-308.
64. Al-Waili NS. Topical application of natural honey,
beeswax and olive oil mixture for atopic dermatitis or psoriasis:
partially controlled, single-blinded study. Complement Ther
Med. 2003;11(4):226-234.
65. Al-Waili NS. An alternative treatment for pityriasis
versicolor, tinea cruris, tinea corporis and tinea faciei with
topical application of honey, olive oil and beeswax mixture: an
open pilot study. Complement Ther Med. 2004;12(1):45-47.
66. Al-Waili NS. Clinical and mycological benefits of topical
application of honey, olive oil and beeswax in diaper dermatitis.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(2):160-163.
67. Al-Waili NS. Topical honey application vs. acyclovir for
the treatment of recurrent herpes simplex lesions. Med Sci
Monit. 2004;10(8):Mt94-98.
68. Ngatu NR, Saruta T, Hirota R, et al. Antifungal efficacy of
Brazilian green propolis extracts and honey on Tinea capitis and
Tinea versicolor. Eur J Integr Med. 2011;3(4):e281-e287.
69. Braithwaite I, Hunt A, Riley J, et al. Randomised
controlled trial of topical kanuka honey for the treatment of
rosacea. BMJ open. 2015;5(6):e007651.
70. Semprini A, Braithwaite I, Corin A, et al. Randomised
controlled trial of topical kanuka honey for the treatment of
acne. BMJ open. 2016;6(2):e009448.
71. Fingleton J, Helm C, Tofield C, Weatherall M, Beasley R.
A randomised controlled trial of topical Kanuka honey for the
treatment of eczema. JRSM open.
2014;5(1):2042533313509263.
72. Fingleton J, Sheahan D, Corin A, Weatherall M, Beasley
R. A randomised controlled trial of topical Kanuka honey for the
treatment of psoriasis. JRSM open.
2014;5(3):2042533313518913.
73. Fingleton J, Corin A, Sheahan D, et al. Randomised
controlled trial of topical kanuka honey for the treatment of
cold sores. Adv Integr Med. 2014;1(3):119-123.
74. Naidoo NM, P. Littler, R. Mok, G. Jameson, M. Round, G.
A phase II randomized controlled trial of manuka honey as
prophylaxis against radiation induced dermatitis in breast
cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(Supplement 1):S367.
75. Nilforoushzadeh MA, Jaffary F, Moradi S, Derakhshan R,
Haftbaradaran E. Effect of topical honey application along with
intralesional injection of glucantime in the treatment of
cutaneous leishmaniasis. BMC Complement Altern Med.
2007;7:13.
76. Fernandez-Cabe zudo MJ, El-Kharrag R, Tora b F, et al.
Intravenous administration of manuka honey inhibits tumor
growth and improves host survival when used in combination
with chemotherapy in a melanoma mouse model. PLoS One.
2013;8(2):e55993.
77. Pichichero E, Cicconi R, Mattei M, Muzi MG, Canini A.
Acacia honey and chrysin reduce proliferation of melanoma
cells through alterations in cell cycle progression. Int J Oncol.
2010;37(4):973-981.
78. Ahmad I, Jimenez H, Yaacob NS, Yusuf N. Tualang honey
protects keratinocytes from ultraviolet rad iation-induced
inflammation and DNA damage. Photochem Photobiol.
2012;88(5):1198-1204.
79. Pichichero E, C icconi R, Mattei M, Canini A. Chrysin-
induced apoptosis is mediated through p38 and Bax activation
in B16-F1 and A375 melanoma cells. Int J Oncol.
2011;38(2):473-483.
80. Placzek WJ, Wei J, Kitada S, Zhai D, Reed JC, Pellecchia
M. A survey of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 subfamily expression in
cancer types provides a platform to predict the efficacy of Bcl-2
antagonists in cancer therapy. Cell Death Dis. 2010;1:e40.
81. Jiang X, Shapiro DJ. The immune system and
inflammation in breast can cer. Mol Cell Endocrinol.
2014;382(1):673-682.
82. Erdei E, Torres SM. A new understanding in the
epidemiology of melanoma. Expert Rev Antican cer Ther.
2010;10(11):1811-1823.
83. WHO. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on
surveillance.: World Health Organisation;2014.
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
84. Baizhumanova A, Sakamoto J. Cancer in Kazakhstan:
Present situation on Cancer. Annals of Cancer Research and
Therapy. 2010;18(2):65-68.
85. Iwata K, Takamura N, Nakashima M, et al. Loss of
heterozygosity on chromosome 9q22.3 in microdissected basal
cell carcinomas around the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Testing Site,
Kazakhstan. Hum Pathol.;35(4):460-464.
86. Benguedouar L, Lahouel M, Gangloff SC, et al. Ethanolic
extract of Algerian Propolis and galangin decreased murine
melanoma tumour progression. Anticancer Agents Med Chem.
2016.
87. Henshaw FR, Bolton T, Nube V, et al. Topical application
of the bee hive protectant propolis is well tolerated and
improves human diabetic foot ulcer healing in a prospective
feasibility study. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28(6):850-
857.
88. Nina N, Quispe C, Jimenez -Aspee F, et al. Antibacterial
Activity, Antioxidant Effect and Chemical Composition of
Propolis from the Region del Maule, Central Chile. Molecules.
2015;20(10):18144-18167.
89. Akhmetova A ST, Kulsharova G, Nurgozhin T,
Mikhalovsky S. Current State of Chronic Wound Care in
Kazakhstan: Focus on Topica l Treatments. Russian O pen
Medical Journal. 2015;4(1).
90. Kuncic MK, Jaklic D, Lapanje A, Gunde-Cimerman N.
Antibacterial an d antimycotic activities of Slovenian honeys. Br
J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(4):154-158.
91. Shahzad A, Cohrs RJ. In vitro antiviral activity of honey
against varicella zoster virus (VZV): A translational medicine
study for potential remedy for shingles. Transl Biomed.
2012;3(2).
92. Canonico B, Candiracci M, Citterio B, et al. Honey
flavonoids inhibit Candida albicans morphogenesis by affecting
DNA behavior and mitochondrial function. Future Microbiol.
2014;9(4):445-456.
93. Jenkins R, Burton N, Cooper R. Proteomic and genomic
analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
exposed to manuka honey in vitro demonstrated down-
regulation of virulence markers. J Antimicrob Chemother.
2014;69(3):603-615.
94. Lee JH, Park JH, Kim JA, et al. Low concentrations of
honey reduce biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and virulence
in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biofouling. 2011;27(10):1095-
1104.
95. Gannabathula S, Skinner MA, Rosendale D, et al.
Arabinogalactan proteins contribute to the immunostimulatory
properties of New Zealand honeys. Immunopharmacol
Immunotoxicol. 2012;34(4):598-607.
96. Raynaud A, Ghezali L, Gloaguen V, Liagre B, Quero F,
Petit JM. Honey-induced macrophage stimulation: AP-1 and NF-
kappaB activation and cytokine production are unrelated to LPS
content of honey. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;17(3):874-879.
97. Timm M, Bartelt S, Hansen EW. Immunomodulatory
effects of honey cannot be distinguished from endotoxin.
Cytokine. 2008;42(1):113-120.
98. Tonks A, Cooper RA, Price AJ, Molan PC, Jones KP.
Stimulation of TNF-alpha release in monocytes by honey.
Cytokine. 2001;14(4):240-242.
99. Tonks AJ, Dudley E, Porter NG, et al. A 5.8-kDa
component of manuka honey stimulates immune cells via TLR4.
J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82(5):1147-1155.
100. Tomblin V, Ferguson LR, Han DY, Murray P, Schlothauer
R. Potential path way of anti-inflammatory effect by New
Zealand honeys. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:149-158.
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
Table 1: Honey as a therapeutic agent for skin disorders; Summary of the key in vitro
findings
Key References
Key Findings (in vitro)
14-17,59-61,90,91
Honeys from around the world have potent antimicrobial activity
against skin relevant microbes.
22
Honey can reverse antimicrobial resistance.
21,92-94
Pathogenicity of skin relevant microbes is reduced by honey.
23-25,95-99
Honey modulates cytokine production by cells of the skin immune
system.
26,27,58,100
Anti-inflammatory effects of honey are observed in vitro.
28-30
Honey promotes re-epithelialisation and angiogenesis in in vitro
wound models.
76-78
Honey induces apoptosis of a murine melanoma cell line and
protects keratinocytes from the photocarcinogenic effects of UVB
radiation.
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
Table 2: Honey as a therapeutic agent for skin disorders; Summary of the key in vivo
findings
Key References
Key Findings (in vivo)
56
Clinical studies suggest that topical application of honey is more
efficacious than conventional treatments in healing partial thickness burn
wounds.
34,36-38,43,45,46,53
The efficacy of honey in the treatment of non-burn acute wounds and
chronic wounds is controversial.
63-66,68,69
Limited human studies suggest that honey is therapeutic in the treatment
of some inflammatory skin disorders and fungal skin infections.
76
Honey reduces tumour growth in a murine melanoma model.
MCLOONE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
Table 3: Studies investigating the efficacy of honey in the treatment of skin disorders
(excluding wounds)
Population
Honey Application
Outcome
Ref.
37 patients; 14 with
pityriasis versicolor, 8
with tinea corporis, 14
with tinea cruris and 1
with tinea faciei
Honey mixture containing honey, olive oil
and beeswax (1:1:1) applied to the lesions
3 times daily for a maximum of 4 weeks.
Honey was multi-floral from the United
Arab Emirates.
Complete cure obtained in 79% of
patients with pityriasis versicolor;
71% of patients with tinea cruris and
62% of patients with tinea corporis.
Patient with tinea faciei obtained
clinical cure 3 weeks after start of
therapy.
65
242 Congolese school
children with either
tinea capitis or
pityriasis versicolor
Treated with either 2% Miconazole,
Brazilian green propolis extract or acasia
honey (Yamada bee farm, Japan) or
Vaseline.
Acasia honey (p < 0.05), Brazilian
green propolis extract (p < 0.05) and
2% Miconazole (p < 0.01)
significantly improved erythema,
desquamation and pruritis in tinea
patients in comparison to Vaseline.
68
10 patients with atopic
dermatitis
Lesions on the right side of the body
treated with vaseline. Lesions on the left
side of the body treated with a multifloral
honey mixture, containing honey beeswax
and olive oil in a ratio of 1:1:1 for 2
weeks. Each treatment was applied three
times daily. Honey was from the United
Arab Emirates.
Significant improvement was seen in
lesion scores on the left side of the
body in 8 out of the 10 patients.
64
8 patients with
psoriasis
Lesions on the right side of the body were
treated with paraffin and lesions on the left
were treated with honey mixture (as
described above), 3 times daily for 3
weeks.
Significant improvement was seen in
lesion scores on the left side of the
body in 5 out of 8 patients.
64
12 infants with diaper
dermatitis
Topical application 4 times daily with a
multifloral honey mixture containing
honey, beeswax and olive oil in a ratio of
1:1:1 for 7 days.
Mean total rash score at baseline was
2.91 ± 0.79. Decreased to 0.66 ± 0.98
at day 7. At the end of the study 10 of
the 12 infants had either mild or no
diaper dermatitis.
66
81 patients undergoing
radiation therapy for
breast cancer
Prophylatic treatment: 43 treated with a
pure sterilized manuka honey UMF=18.
Thirty eight patients treated with standard
aqueous cream. Topical treatments were
applied twice daily starting on day 1 of
radiation and continued until 10 days post
treatment.
Lower incidence of > grade 2
dermatitis in the patients treated with
honey (37.2%) compared with those
treated with aqueous cream (57.8%).
When ≥ grade 2 dermatitis did occur
duration was shorter in honey treated
group. p = 0.08
74
138 patients with
rosacea (IGA-RSS) ≥
2.69
69 patients treated with topical application
of Honevo (90% kanuka honey and 10%
glycerine) for 8 weeks. 69 patients treated
with the control cream Cetomacrogol.
34.3 % in the Honevo group and
17.4% in the control group had a ≥ 2
improvement in the IGA-RSS at
week 8. p = 0.02
69
CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 United States License.
This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part
of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Volume 5, No. 1 (2016) | ISSN 2166-7403 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cajgh.2016.241 | http://cajgh.pitt.edu
136 patients aged 16-
40 years with acne
IGA ≥ 2.68
68 participants applied Protex, a
trilocarbon based antibacterial soap twice
daily for 12 weeks. Another 68
participants followed the antibacterial soap
treatment regime and applied Honevo
(90% kanuka honey and 10% glycerine)
directly after washing off the anti-bacterial
soap, twice daily for 12 weeks.
4/53 (7.6%) of participants in the
honey group and 1/53 (1.9%) in the
control group had a ≥ 2 improvement
in IGA score at week 12. Trial did
not show evidence that adding
Honevo to the antibacterial soap
regime was more effective than soap
alone.
70
15 patients with
bilateral eczematous
lesions on the limbs
Medical grade kanuka honey was applied
to a representative lesion on one side and
aqueous cream BP on the other, every
night for 2 weeks.
Kanuka honey was not more
efficacious than aqueous cream BP in
the treatment of eczema. Aqueous
cream BP is not a recommended
treatment for eczema.
71
15 patients with
psoriasis with bilateral
lesions on the limbs.
Medical grade kanuka honey was applied
to a representative lesion on one side and
aqueous cream BP on the other, every
night for 2 weeks.
Efficacy was similar to that of the
aqueous cream which is a
recommended treatment for psoriasis.
72
15 participants aged 16
or over with recurrent
Herpes Simplex
Labialis
Participants applied either medical grade
kanuka honey or acyclovir to the lesion 5
times per day until the lesion resolved.
Kaplan-meier estimates of median
healing time were similar for honey
and acyclovir.
73
90 patients with
cutaneous
leishmaniasis
45 patients treated with topical honey
twice daily along with intra-lesional
injection of glucantime once weekly for a
maximum of 6 weeks. 45 patients treated
with glucantime only.
More patients had complete cure in
the glucantime only treated group
(71%) than in the glucantime and
honey treated group (51%). p = 0.04
75