Technical ReportPDF Available

Soil pH Affects Nutrient Availability

Authors:

Abstract

Fertilizers, whether commercial or from manure sources, will not be effective if soil pH isn’t managed. Besides nutrient availability, soil biology and pesticide efficacy can also be pH dependent. Unfortunately, due to varying soil types and crop needs, there isn’t a single pH that is ideal. While most crops are assigned a suitable pH range (6.0 to 6.5), producers can maximize yields by better understanding soil properties and crop response.
1
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu
i
Fertilizers, whether commercial or from manure
sources, will not be effective if soil pH isn’t
managed. Besides nutrient availability, soil biology
and pesticide efficacy can also be pH dependent.
Unfortunately, due to varying soil types and crop
needs, there isn’t a single pH that is ideal. While
most crops are assigned a suitable pH range (6.0 to
6.5), producers can maximize yields by better
understanding soil properties and crop response.
Acidic Soils have a pH Less than 7
The pH scale (0-14) measures hydrogen (H)
concentration, which causes acidity. A pH of 7 is
considered neutral while anything lower is acidic.
Any pH greater than 7 (alkaline) will have more base
(OH) than H. Pure water is a combination of H and
OH (H2O).
It may seem best to maintain a neutral pH 7, but H
doesn’t reach plant toxicity levels until below pH
4.5. It is elements like aluminum (Al), iron (Fe) and
manganese (Mn) that can cause plant toxicity in
acid soils.
While Acidity is Caused by H, There can be Many
Different Sources
Minerals in the soil (Al and Fe) cause acidity by
splitting water and releasing H (Figure 1). These
minerals are called acidic cations. Calcium (Ca),
magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K) are base cations
because they do not split water, and therefore
don’t create acidity.
Figure 1. Dissolved aluminum can react with water
to create acidity
Ammonium (NH4+) fertilizers (e.g. urea), manure or
compost also add acids to soil. Some products, such
as elemental sulfur (S), are applied to purposefully
lower the soil pH.
Soils can Become More Acidic as Base Cations are
Leached out by Rainfall
Although pure water has a pH 7, natural rainfall is
slightly acidic due to carbon dioxide (CO2) in the
atmosphere. When CO2 dissolves in rainwater, the
pH is approximately 5.6. This should not be
confused with acid rain, where sulfur from fossil
fuels creates sulfuric acid, depressing rainfall pH
below 5.
Soil pH in Maryland will range from 5 to 7, similar to
the slightly acidic rainfall the state receives (Figure
2). The opposite can be seen in dry, arid
environments, where less rainfall can lead to
alkaline soils (pH > 7).
Soil pH Affects Nutrient Availability
Fact Sheet FS-1054
July 2016
Al+3 + 3H2O Al(OH)3 + 3H+
2
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu
Figure 2. Rainfall in Maryland (orange soil) can
leach out basic cations and leave behind acids (Al
and H). Desert soils (brown) may actually have
more evaporation leading to salt accumulation and
an alkaline pH at the surface
Soil Type and Weathering can Predict the Amount
of Base Cations (Ca, Mg, K, and Na)
Younger soils typically have less acids and more
bases. As these soils are leached and weathered
over time, they will become more acidic (Figure 2).
Most soils in Maryland can be considered highly
weathered, particularly those with greater clay
content. It is a good rule of thumb that soils high in
clay are also high in Al.
Parent materials that contribute bases back to the
soil will maintain a moderate pH, such as those on
the Piedmont (central Maryland). In the Ridge and
Valley province of the Appalachians, soils may form
from carbonate limestone bedrock and maintain a
neutral to alkaline pH. Soils lacking a ready source
of dissolvable nutrients (e.g. Eastern Shore sands)
are likely to be more acidic. In addition, quartz
sands have low cation exchange capacity (CEC). The
CEC is a measure of the capacity of a soil to hold
nutrients, so that quartz sands with a low CEC will
not retain as many bases.
Soil CEC Holds Acids and Bases, but not all Soils
have the Same CEC
Clay soils with higher CEC hold more bases (Ca, Mg,
K, and Na) as well as acids (Al, H). Producers must
manage their soil type properly, understanding that
soil with greater CEC will require more lime to raise
the pH. Soil with greater CEC will also acidify slower.
The Al and H held on the CEC is referred to as
reserve acidity. The amount of acids held on the soil
must also be measured by a testing lab to calculate
the correct lime requirement to reach the target
pH.
Crop Being Grown Determines the Target Soil pH
Most field crops prefer a pH range of 6 to 7, while
some plants thrive in more acidic conditions
(azaleas or blueberries). Crops like potatoes may be
more susceptible to diseases at alkaline soil pH.
With different varieties or hybrids, it is increasingly
difficult to predict variability within a crop. Studies
of soybeans and corn indicate that some varieties
may be more susceptible to Mn and Al toxicity. The
susceptibility of your variety of choice may not be
well known, which requires field observations to
discern any differences.
While crop ranges are good guidelines, they do not
take other important soil characteristics into
account. This includes the toxicity of elements such
Al and Fe, as well as the availability of macro and
micronutrients.
Soil pH Affects the Availability of N and P
Nitrogen (N), from urea fertilizers or mineralized
from organic matter, is in the form of ammonium
(NH4+). In alkaline soils, NH4+ becomes ammonia
(NH3), and can be volatilized (lost as a gas). In acid
soils, the additional H helps maintain NH4+
concentrations, which can adsorb to the CEC.
Uptake of nitrate (NO3-) by plants is best at a lower
pH, while NH4+ is absorbed more efficiently at a
neutral pH. For legumes, a pH < 6 restricts
nodulation on alfalfa, but not as much on red
3
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu
clover. The dissolved Al observed in acid soils also
can be toxic to rhizobia and plant roots, limiting
legume production of N.
Denitrification, which transforms NO3- into gaseous
N2 in waterlogged soils, occurs at lower rates in acid
soils (pH < 5).
Optimum P availability is at pH 6.5. Below 6.5, P
becomes insoluble Al/Fe minerals or absorbs to
oxides and clay. Above 6.5, P bonds with Ca to form
solid minerals similar to Ca-phosphate fertilizers.
Relatedly, Ca-phosphate fertilizers added to acid
soils will readily dissolve and release P, but will have
limited solubility in alkaline soils.
Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca) and Magnesium (Mg)
are Indirectly Affected by pH
Potassium, Ca and Mg are less available in acid soils
because they have been leached out, not
necessarily due to solubility issues. Al can also
dominate the CEC, limiting the soils ability to absorb
and hold K. Compared to K, Ca and Mg are more
competitive with Al for CEC sites. In addition, toxic
levels of Mn and Al may damage plants roots,
preventing uptake of Ca, Mg and K.
While alkaline soils are associated with greater
concentrations of Ca, this can be in the form of
precipitated CaCO3 (lime).
Sulfur is Available in Soils as the ion SO4- over a
Wide Range of pH
The ion SO4- form of sulfur is negatively charged and
is retained better by acidic soils. It is important to
remember that when elemental sulfur (S) is added
to soil, it creates sulfuric acid (lowering pH).
However, compounds containing SO4- (gypsum) do
not have the same ability to lower pH.
Table 1. Micronutrients and their availability
related to soil pH
As pH Rises, Micronutrients Bond to the Soil or
Become Insoluble Minerals and Cannot be Taken
up by Plants
All the known micronutrients (Table 1) decrease in
availability as pH rises, except for molybdenum
(Mo). Zinc (Zn), Cu and Mn decrease 100 fold in
concentration with every one unit increase in pH.
These nutrients are not lost, but rather
preferentially sorb to soil surfaces, where they are
not plant available. When concentrations are high
(e.g Fe), they will precipitate as solid minerals.
When severe, deficiencies will cause obvious
symptoms in the field (Figure 3). If a micronutrient
deficiency is observed in an acidic soil, it is probably
related to lower concentrations and the leached
nature of the soil.
Figure 3. A soybean field with a manganese
deficiency due to higher pH
Micronutrient
pH Available
Boron (B)
Acidic
Zinc (Zn)
Acidic
Manganese (Mn)
Acidic
Iron (Fe)
Acidic
Copper (Cu)
Acidic
Molybdenum (Mo)
Alkaline
Chlorine (Cl)
N/A
4
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu
Concentration Controls Whether a Micronutrient is
Deficient or Toxic
Sandy soils are typically lower in micronutrient
concentrations, so the pH has to be carefully
managed. For soybean growth, sandy soils with a
pH 5.5 required 4 lbs Mn/acre, but at least 17
lbs/acre was needed when the pH was 7 (Table 2).
This indicates that a greater amount of
micronutrient is necessary in a sandy soil to ensure
availability.
Table 2. Extractable manganese concentration
(lb/acre) necessary to grow soybeans in sandy soil
(Camberato, 2000)
Soil pH
Mn (lb/acre)
5.5
4
6.0
9
6.5
13
7.0
>17
Finer textured clay soils often have greater
micronutrient concentrations and can tolerate
higher pH than sandier soils. As a result, pH
recommendations from the University of Delaware
for sandy soils may be 6.0, while those with finer
textures can be up to 6.5.
Deficiency will be more common for the weathered
soils in Maryland, but toxicity should still be
considered in some cases. Elements like Fe and Mn
are more available in acid soils, and if their
concentration is too high, they can be toxic to
crops. If a producer has over-applied a
micronutrient to acid soil, the excessive
concentration could reduce yields.
Al Toxicity Should be a Concern
When soil pH drops below 5.5, Al becomes soluble
and is toxic to plant roots. All soils have some free
Al, although it is more likely to be higher in
weathered, clay soils (Figure 4).
Therefore, sandy soils low in Al could possibly
tolerate pH lower than 5.5. In addition, soils very
high in organic matter can remove Al from the soil
solution, and can also tolerate lower soil pH for crop
growth. In Maryland, weathered soils with high clay
content are the most likely to experience Al toxicity
when the pH is below 5.5.
Figure 4. The red color
of this soil indicates
oxide coatings and
greater weathering.
Soils like this will have
more Al, but can also
show greater tolerance
to higher pH and
micronutrient
availability.
Understanding Soil Type and Crop Needs is
Essential
There are some important things to keep in mind
regarding the pH of a soil:
A neutral pH of 7.0 is not needed to
maximize production.
Reduce Al toxicity by maintaining a pH
greater than 5.5.
Micronutrients may have a narrow range of
availability versus toxicity. Watch for
deficiencies when the pH is raised.
Sandy, low CEC soils will leach nutrients
faster than fields with clay soils. Due to
lower concentrations, a high pH will also
cause micronutrients to bond tightly to soil
surfaces. A pH 6.0 or less is best.
5
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu
References
Adams, F. 1984. “Crop response to lime in the
southeastern United States,” Soil Acidity and
Liming. Dinauer, R.C. (Ed). ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison,
WI.
Brady, N.C., R.R. Weil. 1999. Elements of the Nature
and Properties of Soils. Abrid 12 ed. Prentice-Hall.
Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Camberato, J.J. 2000. Manganese Deficiency and
Fertilization of Soybeans. Clemson Extension.
Foy, C.D. 1984. “Physiological effects of hydrogen,
aluminum, and manganese toxicities in acid soil,”
Soil Acidity and Liming. Dinauer, R.C. (Ed). ASA-
CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI.
Gascho, G.J. and M.B. Parker. 2001. “Long-term
liming effects on coastal plain soils and crops,
Agron. J. 93:1305-1315.
Havlin, J, J.D. Beaton, S.L Tisdale, W.L. Nelson. 1999.
Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to
Nutrient Management. 6th ed. Prentice-Hall. Upper
Saddle River, NJ.
Jones, J.B. 2012. Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility
Manual. 2nd ed. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
Lanyon, L.E., B. Naghshineh-Pour, and E.O. Mclean.
1977. “Effects on pH level on yields and
compositions of pearl millet and alfalfa in soils with
differing degrees of weathering,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
41:389-394.
Lathwell, D.J. and S.W. Reid. 1984. “Crop response
to lime in the northeastern United States,” Soil
acidity and liming. Dinauer, R.C. (Ed). ASA-CSSA-
SSSA. Madison, WI.
Liebhardt, W.C. 1979. “Corn yield as affected by
lime rate and type on a coastal plain soil,” Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J. 43:985-968.
Pagani, A. and A. P. Mallarino. 2014. “On-Farm
evaluation of corn and soybean grain yield and soil
pH responses to liming,” Agron. J. 107(1): 71-82.
Shuman, L.M. 1986. “Effect of liming on the
distribution of manganese, copper, iron and zinc
among soil fractions,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
50(5):1236-1240.
Sims, J.L. and W.H. Patrick. 1977. “The distribution
of micronutrient cations in soil under conditions of
varying redox potential and pH,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am J.
42(2): 258-262.
Jarrod O. Miller
This publication, Soil pH Affects Nutrient Availability FS-1054, is a series of publications of the University of Maryland Extension. The
information presented has met UME peer review standards, including internal and external technical review. For more information on
related publications and programs, visit: https://extension.umd.edu/anmp. Please visit http://extension.umd.edu/ to find out more about
Extension programs in Maryland.
The University of Maryland, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources programs are open to all and will not discriminate against anyone because of race, age, sex, color,
sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, religion, ancestry, or national origin, marital status, genetic information, or political affiliation, or gender identity and expression.
... Generally, micronutrients availability tends to decrease as soil pH increases. Additionally, the increase in soil pH reduces the strong bonds of aluminium oxides and iron oxides, resulting in the increased availability of nutrient elements to plants (Miller, 2016). In practice, continuous cultivation of the amended soil will require inputs of nutrients at a suitable rate to maintain plant growth and a healthy microbial population. ...
... among treatment ( Figure 2). The increases in Cu and Zn in the plant tissue may be attributed to the pH levels (between 5.3 and 6.6 at 0 t/ha and 30 t/ha respectively), which are suitable for the uptake of these micronutrients (Miller, 2016). The amount of nutrients and elements in the plant tissue is highly dependent on their availability in the soil environment. ...
Article
The presence of marginal or degraded soils across the hinterland regions of Guyana has stymied efforts to expand agriculture. Charcoal can be used as an organic soil amendment to improve soil quality and agricultural productivity. In a greenhouse study, four charcoal (derived from Dimorphandra conjugate Splitg.) application rates of 0, 10, 20 and 30 t/ha were used to amend Tabela sand (acidic and infertile soil from the intermediate savannahs of Guyana). Lactuca sativa L. (lettuce) was used as an indicator crop to evaluate the optimum charcoal application rate for plant growth when inoculated with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Rhizophorus irregularis. Evidence from this study showed that as charcoal application rates increased, root length, yield of lettuce, root colonisation and the abundance of AMF spores increased. Soil pH, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity and water holding capacity increased significantly (p < .05), while soil bulk density and exchangeable acidity showed marked decrease as charcoal application rates increased. In addition, considerable increases were observed in total nitrogen, and available phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, manganese and zinc. In contrast, notable decreases were observed for available iron and copper, also. Therefore, charcoal amended Tabela sand in combination with AMF has the potential to increase the productivity of soils.
... Availability of all the micronutrients decreases as pH rises, except for molybdenum (Mo). Zn, Cu and Mn availability decreases 100-fold in concentration with every one unit increase in pH (Miller, 2016). At high pH, Fe and other micronutrients (except Mo) are rendered unavailable since they are locked up as insoluble hydroxides and carbonates. ...
Article
Soil acidity is one of the major yield limiting factors in rice crop production. The H+ and Al3+ ions in the soil must be neutralized by the release of OH-ions on application of liming materials for the management of soil acidity. Liming material is the substance, which can increase the soil pH by combining with H+ ions in the soil solution. Lime is the most widely used ameliorant for management of soil acidity. There are alternative products, such as dolomite, rice husk ash, gypsum, phosphogypsum and calcium magnesium silicates having high reactivity than lime in increasing the pH, supply of nutrients like Ca, Mg, Si etc., and have the potential to reduce iron and aluminium toxicity and reduce methane emission. Fineness and chemical purity of the liming material are the major factors affecting the ability of the material to neutralise soil pH. Method and timing of application of liming material depend on the place of origin, nutrients and other elements associated with it, and amount of neutralising power. Relative worth of the liming material also depends on the cost of the same.
... Table 1.1), so adding biochar with alkaline pH would only increase soil alkalinity. The soil pH affects the nature in which the nutrients are usable and available for soil and plant use (Khaidem & Thomas Meetei, 2018;Miller, 2016) since most nutrients are best available between pH of 6 and 7.5 (Liu & Hanlon, 2022). Alkaline soils do not easily dissolve soil nutrients compared to acidic soils, making the nutrients less available in usable form by soils and plants. ...
... Contrary to expectations, we found that adding higher concentrations of fertiliser (van Rensburg 2004;Liebenberg et al. 2013) to waste rock did not increase germination or leaf production significantly. High soil calcium levels correlate positively with alkalinity and high pH and affect the availability of nutrients to plants as calcium binds nutrients in the soil and may precipitate fertilisers if applied liberally (Clark and Baligar 2000;Bloem 2013;Miller 2016). In our study, the mean calcium values for the waste rock were extremely high (3 324 mg kg −1 ) compared to those in the analogue soils (780 mg kg −1 ). ...
Article
Global restoration is a priority given the onset of the United Nations’ decade for restoration. It is challenging to restore arid lands from mining impacts, especially where topsoil deficits exist. Successful rehabilitation is essential for alternative land use after mining. This bioassay aimed to establish whether and why some combinations of iron ore mine-affected soils and ameliorants are more effective in promoting plant growth than others. We examined the responses of one thousand radishes (Raphanus sativus)to five mine-affected soils and four soil ameliorations (soil improvement using fertiliser and organic matter) over two different seasons (early and late rainy seasons). We found that soil characteristics affected plant production regardless of amelioration and that some soil/amelioration combinations were significantly better than others. Topsoil ameliorated by moderate fertiliser application produced the best results. Waste rock could support germination and plant production when ameliorated with certain organic compost and fertiliser combinations. Untreated mine-affected soils had low to no plant production. Plant responses to the different soil/amelioration combinations were affected by season. Our findings suggest that area-specific bioassay investigations and their results could improve management decisions to achieve rehabilitation targets for mine-affected soils.
... Similarly, the growth rate of plants of the treatment T2 was higher in comparison to T1 for the reason that NPK improved the growth of root and shoot systems and better photosynthetic activities which ultimately supported growth but lower than the T3 because there was use of four types of micronutrient in T3. The lower vegetative growths of T1 and T2 might be attributed to the low availability of the micronutrient in neutral to slightly higher pH (Khadka and Lamichhane, 2016;Miller, 2016). The average growth of base circumference was 11.95 cm in T3 whereas it was 9.93 cm in T1 per two months from 30 days to 270 days after planting (Table 3). ...
Article
Full-text available
A field experiment was conducted in Cavendish banana cv. 'Grand Naine' to evaluate the effect of plant nutrients on vegetative growth. The nutrients comprised N, P, K, and Zn, Fe, Cu, and B supplied through soil application (NPK) and foliar spray (Zn, Fe, Cu, and B) at 3rd, 5th and 7th months after planting. Experiment was carried out under the alkaline soil condition of Directorate of Agricultural Research, Khajura, Banke, Nepal for two cropping seasons 2020-2021 (plant crop) and 2021-2022 (first ratoon crop). Trial was laid-out in randomized complete block design with seven treatments replicated three times. Planting of tissue culture banana was done on 4th July of 2020 as plant crop and suckers selected from the same plant at the same date was considered as the first ratoon crop. An experimental unit (16 m2) consisted of four plants maintained 2×2 m spacing planted in 40 cm deep pit having the same diameter. FYM was supplied at four installments, basal, 3rd, 5th and 7th months after planting while chemical fertilizers (Urea, DAP, MoP) were applied at six installments, 30, 75, 110, 150, 180 days after planting and 100 g of MoP was applied during shooting. The pooled data of plant and first ratoon crop revealed that the greatest base circumference (68.92 cm), the tallest plant (222.00 cm), the highest number of effective leaves (17.00), the greatest leaf area (16.07 m2) and leaf area index (4.02), the highest plant spread (327.60 cm) and the highest number of cumulative leaves (44.00) were recorded at shooting in T3 (FYM 20 kg/plant + NPK 250:250:350 g per plant + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.2%)+ CuSO4 (0.2%) + Borax (0.1%). Therefore, from the study banana growers are highly recommended to use FYM, chemical fertilizers along with the foliar spray of micronutrients, at least for three times at vegetative growth phase of banana grown under alkaline soil condition for achieving the highest growth of plant.
Article
Full-text available
Soil pH is crucial to soil health, influencing nutrient availability, microbial activity, and plant growth. This review aims to assess the adaptability of soil pH under changing soil conditions by analyzing natural and human factors. Information was gathered from various sources, including peer-reviewed articles, field studies, and recent advances in soil science. The study explores how natural factors such as parent material, climate, and vegetation establish baseline soil pH, while human activities such as intensive farming and land-use changes further modify it, often leading to soil acidification or alkalinization. Traditional management methods like lime application, organic amendments, and crop rotation are reviewed for their effectiveness in stabilizing soil pH and their limitations under varying soil conditions. The review also explores modern technological innovations like precision agriculture, which uses soil sensors and variable rate technology for targeted pH management, and biological approaches, such as microbial inoculants, to enhance nutrient cycling and organic matter decomposition. Integrating these traditional and contemporary approaches is essential for sustainable soil pH management and long-term productivity. The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach that combines historical knowledge with emerging technologies to promote sustainable agricultural practices and environmental conservation.
Article
Full-text available
Este trabajo se realizó con el objetivo de conocer el comportamiento del cultivo de naranja Valencia en “fincas tipo” de la provincia de Chanchamayo, Junín-Perú. El estudio se realizó en Chanchamayo, Región Junín, entre los meses de enero y diciembre del año 2016; para ello se seleccionaron cuatro “fincas tipo” (FT1, FT2, FT3, FT4), con plantas de diez años de edad. Se le denomina “finca tipo” a la propiedad representativa del grupo de fincas del que fue seleccionado. En cada “finca tipo” se tomaron muestras de suelo, se seleccionaron cincuenta plantas y se evaluaron las características químicas del suelo; incidencia de plagas y enfermedades, calidad del fruto (peso, diámetro y brix) y rendimiento. Para el análisis estadístico, cada “finca tipo” se consideró como un tratamiento, y cada planta como una repetición (cuatro tratamientos con cincuenta repeticiones); y se trabajó como si fuera un Diseño Completamente al Azar. Los resultados mostraron que el comportamiento de la naranja Valencia fue mejor en la FT2. Esta “finca tipo” tuvo la menor incidencia de plagas y enfermedades; la mejor calidad de fruta y el mayor rendimiento, pero también es la que recibió una mayor inversión.
Article
Full-text available
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of plant nutrients on yield and fruit quality of ‘Grand Naine’ banana under alkaline soil conditions for the two cropping seasons 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 at DoAR, Khajura. The trial was laid out in a randomized complete block design consisting of seven treatments replicated three times having four plants in an experimental plot. Planting of tissue culture banana was done at 2×2 m spacing on 4th July 2020 and suckers selected from the same plant on the same date were taken as the first ratoon crop. Farmyard manure was applied at four, chemical fertilizers at six, and micronutrients at three installments. The pooled results revealed that the longest bunch (114.30 cm), the highest hands (10.08) and finger number per bunch (185.80) and second hand (21.50), the heaviest bunch (25.74 kg) and second-hand weight (3.28 kg), the highest finger length (21.08 cm), diameter (3.85 cm) and weight (156.20 g) and bunch yield (64.35 mt/ha), the highest TSS (20.20%), TSS: TA ratio (47.10) and total sugar (12.55%) and the lowest TA (0.43%) were registered in T3 (20 kg FYM, 250:250:350 g NPK along with foliar spray of four types of micronutrients viz. Zn, Fe, Cu and B at 3rd 5th and 7th months of planting. Hence, from the study banana growers are recommended to use FYM, chemical fertilizers along with a foliar spray of micronutrients, at least three times in the vegetative growth stage of bananas for higher yield and improved quality of fruits.
Article
Full-text available
Biochar is an effective soil amendment with capabilities of boosting carbon sequestration and enhancing soil fertility, thus enhancing plant growth and productivity. While numerous studies have documented the positive effects of biochar on improving soil properties, a number of studies have reported conflicting results. Therefore, the current study was conducted to evaluate the impact of Prosopis juliflora biochar (0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 t ha-1) on soil biochemical properties in Coastal Kenya to ascertain biochar’s potential for soil fertility improvement. A randomized complete block design was used for setting up the experiment with three replicates, while Casuarina equisetifolia L. was planted as the test crop. Soil sampling for nutrient analysis was conducted quarterly for 12 months to assess nutrient dynamics under different biochar rates in the current study. Compared to soil untreated with Prosopis juliflora biochar, the results showed that there was a significant increase in soil pH by 21% following biochar utilization at the rate of 7.5 t ha-1. Total nitrogen was increased by 32% after the biochar application, whereas the total organic carbon was increased by four folds in comparison to biochar-untreated soil. Available phosphorus was increased by 264% following biochar application in comparison to the control treatment. In addition, the application of biochar resulted in an increment in the soil exchangeable cations (Ca2+, K+, Mg2+) across the assessment periods. Soil cation exchange capacity (CEC), bacteria and fungi were enhanced by 95, 33 and 48%, respectively, following biochar application at 7.5 t ha-1 in comparison to untreated soil. In conclusion, these results strongly suggest improvement of soil biochemical properties following Prosopis juliflora biochar application, thus providing potential for soil fertility improvement in regions such as the one in the study.
Book
Full-text available
Thoroughly updated and now in full color, the 15th edition of this market leading text brings the exciting field of soils to life. Explore this new edition to find: A comprehensive approach to soils with a focus on six major ecological roles of soil including growth of plants, climate change, recycling function, biodiversity, water, and soil properties and behavior. New full-color illustrations and the use of color throughout the text highlights the new and refined figures and illustrations to help make the study of soils more efficient, engaging, and relevant. Updated with the latest advances, concepts, and applications including hundreds of key references. New coverage of cutting edge soil science. Examples include coverage of the pedosphere concept, new insights into humus and soil carbon accumulation, subaqueous soils, soil effects on human health, principles and practice of organic farming, urban and human engineered soils, new understandings of the nitrogen cycle, water-saving irrigation techniques, hydraulic redistribution, soil food-web ecology, disease suppressive soils, soil microbial genomics, soil interactions with global climate change, digital soil maps, and many others Applications boxes and case study vignettes bring important soils topics to life. Examples include “Subaqueous Soils—Underwater Pedogenesis,” “Practical Applications of Unsaturated Water Flow in Contrasting Layers,” “Soil Microbiology in the Molecular Age,” and "Where have All the Humics Gone?” Calculations and practical numerical problems boxes help students explore and understand detailed calculations and practical numerical problems. Examples include “Calculating Lime Needs Based on pH Buffering,” “Leaching Requirement for Saline Soils,” "Toward a Global Soil Information System,” “Calculation of Nitrogen Mineralization,” and “Calculation of Percent Pore Space in Soils.”
Article
Full-text available
It is known that soil acidity can limit crop yield, but additional research is needed to identify more precisely optimum soil pH for corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and the within-field variation in yield response to liming. The objective of this study was to identify optimum soil pH for these crops by studying the variation of soil pH and grain yield response to liming within several Iowa fields. Fourteen 4-yr strip-trials were established in acidic Molisols from 2007 to 2009. The methodology used global positioning systems (GPS), dense soil sampling (0.12-0.18-ha cells), yield monitors, and geographical information systems (GIS). One-time treatments replicated two to five times were an unlimed control and limestone at 6.72 Mg ha-1 effective calcium carbonate equivalent (ECCE), incorporated into the soil in fields managed with tillage. Soil samples (15-cm depth) were collected before liming and annually after crop harvest. The lowest initial soil pH at each site ranged from 4.75 to 5.70. Maximum pH increase was reached 1 to 3 yr after liming. Grain yield response to lime varied greatly. Corn yield responded more frequently than soybean yield but the magnitude of the response did not differ consistently. Liming seldom increased yield with pH > 6.0 in soils having a high subsoil pH (≥ 7.4) and CaCO3 within a 1-m depth but often increased yield up to pH 6.5 with lower pH subsoil. The results provided improved criteria for site-specific soil pH and lime management. © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, 5585 Guilford Road, Madison, WI 53711. All rights reserved.
Article
Understanding the effect of soil pH on the distribution of micronutrients among soil forms is a necessary precursor to designing micronutrient extractants that extract the form of the metal available to plants. An experiment was undertaken to determine effects of soil pH changes from different liming sources on the distribution of Mn, Cu, Fe, and Zn among soil fractions and to relate the amounts of micronutrients in the fractions to that extracted by the Mehlich I and DTPA extractants. A sandy soil was amended with rates of 0, 0.99, and 1.98 g kg ⁻¹ of three liming materials: calcitic limestone, dolomitic limestone, and an industrial by‐product containing 203 g kg ⁻¹ Mg. Following a greenhouse experiment, the soils were extracted with DTPA and Mehlich I and fractionated into exchangeable, organic, Mn oxide, amorphous Fe oxide, crystalline Fe oxide and residual fractions. The extracts and fractions were analyzed for Mn, Cu, Fe, and Zn, and there were very few differences among lime sources. Increasing lime rates decreased exchangeable Zn and increased organic fraction Zn and Mn. This increase in Zn and Mn in the organic fraction as pH is increased shows that pH does not influence metals in some fractions in the same manner as it does plant availability. Iron decreased in the exchangeable and organic fractions as pH increased. Correlations between DTPA‐ or Mehlich I‐micronutrients and those in the fractions were significant ( P = 0.05) only for the exchangeable and organic fractions. DTPA‐extractable Fe and Zn values were well‐correlated with plant uptake (0.842** and 0.377*, respectively). The results indicate that a micronutrient soil extractant should remove the exchangeable fraction but none of the oxide fractions and for Mn and Zn, none of the organic fraction.
Article
Ground limestone rates of 0, 2.24, and 8.96 metric tons/ha as calcite, dolomite or a mixture of the two were applied to a Kalmia s1 (Typic Hapludult) in 1970 and 1973. Soil pH was 5.7 at the low rate and 6.4 at the high rate in 1977. Corn ( Zea mays L.) yield was significantly lower at pH 6.4 compared to pH 5.7. At pH 6.4 dolomite resulted in lower corn yields than did calcite or a mixture of the two. Yield of corn was negatively related to soil pH and higher soil Mg and positively with plant Mn. Extration of soil samples with the double acid extractant from 5 min to 48 hours showed that there was considerable non‐exchangeable Ca and Mg at the high lime rate (pH 6.4), but little or none at the low rate (pH 5.7). The nonexchangeable Ca and Mg appear to be reaction products from dolomite. The ratio of nonexchangeable Mg/Ca is 4.48 on a meq basis which is unfavorable for plant growth and indicates why continued use of dolomite on sandy Coastal Plain soil with a low CEC results in a yield decrease.
Article
Bulk samples of soils representative of widely differing degrees of weathering (Mollisols, Alfisol, Ultisols, and Oxisols) were collected. Aliquots of each were adjusted to different pH levels, fertilized, and cropped successively to one cutting of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. Willd.) and three cuttings of alfalfa (Medicago sative L.). As postulated, the trends in crop response to pH differed with crop and with degree of soil weathering. Pearl millet responded very little to increase in pH, except that with very highly weathered soils yields increased significantly up to pH 5.6 to 6.2 followed by a significant decrease at higher pH. Significant increases in alfalfa yields with increased pH were obtained on all soils. However, yields from some of the soils increased prograssively to the highest pH; others leveled off at an intermediate pH, and still others decreased at the highest pH. The latter generally occurred in the most highly weathered soils. Soil and plant analyses as well as visual symptoms suggested that toxic levels of Mn (all soils) and insufficient Ca and high Al (one soil only) were major causes of low alfalfa yields at low pH. Depressed yields of alfalfa in the highly weathered soils at higher pH levels may be related to low levels of available P. The yield response to soil pH vs. degree of weathering relationship was not as clear cut as postulated, but this may not be so much a shortcoming of the hypothesis as it is a consequence of the difficulty in selecting individual soils representative of the highest levels of soil classification, and of the effect of specific parameters important to crop response-soil pH relationships which transcend such soil groupings