ArticlePublisher preview available

How to feed the world sustainably: an overview of the discourse on agroecology and sustainable intensification

Authors:
Barbara Bernard at Geisenheim University
Barbara Bernard
Alexandra Lux at Institute for Social-Ecological Research
Alexandra Lux
Read publisher preview
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

In order to combat hunger and feed a growing world population, adapt to climate change and reduce environmental impacts of unsustainable farming practices, the need for a paradigm shift in agriculture has increasingly been expressed over the past decades. Different approaches are widely discussed which often leads to controversial debates among actors from governments, science, international organisations, NGOs and the private sector. Following the approach of a discourse field analysis (Jahn and Lux in Problemorientierte Diskursfeldanalyse—neue Methoden und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. ISOE-Studientexte 15, Frankfurt/Main, 2009), an overview over the discourse on agroecology and sustainable intensification will be presented. Three issues that are frequently raised in this discourse will be looked at more closely: whether—and if so how much—more food needs to be produced to meet the future demand, how productivity ought to be increased and how agroecology can scale up.
A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Learn more
Content available from Regional Environmental Change
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
How to feed the world sustainably: an overview of the discourse
on agroecology and sustainable intensification
Barbara Bernard
1,2
•Alexandra Lux
1,2
Received: 1 June 2015 / Accepted: 9 July 2016 / Published online: 27 July 2016
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Abstract In order to combat hunger and feed a growing
world population, adapt to climate change and reduce
environmental impacts of unsustainable farming practices,
the need for a paradigm shift in agriculture has increasingly
been expressed over the past decades. Different approaches
are widely discussed which often leads to controversial
debates among actors from governments, science, interna-
tional organisations, NGOs and the private sector. Fol-
lowing the approach of a discourse field analysis (Jahn and
Lux in Problemorientierte Diskursfeldanalyse—neue
Methoden und Anwendungsmo
¨glichkeiten. ISOE-Studien-
texte 15, Frankfurt/Main, 2009), an overview over the
discourse on agroecology and sustainable intensification
will be presented. Three issues that are frequently raised in
this discourse will be looked at more closely: whether—
and if so how much—more food needs to be produced to
meet the future demand, how productivity ought to be
increased and how agroecology can scale up.
Keywords Agroecology Discourse field analysis Food
security Food sovereignty Sustainable intensification
Introduction: challenges in agriculture
and the calls for a paradigm shift
In the Twentieth century, agriculture saw drastic increases
in productivity: after the Second World War, North
America and Europe considerably increased their yields
per ha, from the late 1960s onwards, the Green Revolution
resulted in an unprecedented agricultural growth in large
parts of Asia and Latin America (Pretty 2008; IFPRI 2002).
Globally, yields rose by 150–200 % between 1960 and
2010—taking into account marked regional differences
(FAO 2011; IAASTD 2009). This was primarily achieved
by intensifying cultivation (e.g. development of high-
yielding varieties, greater use of inorganic fertilisers, pes-
ticides and irrigation, large-scale monocropping systems).
What is frequently referred to as the industrialisation of
agriculture, allowed for a greater productivity, while
workload decreased and food prices declined (IFPRI 2002;
Gliessman 2015). Rates in aggregate food production
generally exceeded population growth, and the Green
Revolution is frequently assigned as having an important
role in the reduction in hunger and poverty in those
countries where its technologies were applied (IFPRI
2002).
However, despite this enormous growth in productivity,
it did not succeed in achieving food security on a global
level (Pretty et al. 2006; IAASTD 2009), nor on a local
level: The poorer part of the rural population benefitted less
than the wealthier part, and women benefitted less than
men (FAO 1997). Per definition, ‘‘[f]ood security exists
when all people, at all times, have physical and economic
access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets
their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and
healthy life’’ (World Food Summit 1996). According to the
latest Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
&Barbara Bernard
barbara.bernard@stadt-frankfurt.de
1
Institute for Social-Ecological Research ISOE, Hamburger
Allee 45, 60486 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
2
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre BiK-F,
Georg-Voigt-Straße 14-16, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
123
Reg Environ Change (2017) 17:1279–1290
DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1027-y
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Conflicting views and controversies regarding sustainability are particularly obvious when it comes to agriculture 4,[8][9][10][11] . Agriculture is both a major contributor and highly vulnerable to global environmental change, including biodiversity loss, climate change and antimicrobial resistance [12][13][14] . ...
... To exemplify what some of these disagreements might look like in research, we analyse two highly influential fields of contemporary research on agriculture sustainability underpinned by different assumptions: agroecology (AE) and sustainable intensification (SI) 9 . Drawing on peer-reviewed literature on AE and SI published in the period from 2012 to 2022, we combine bibliometric network analysis 16,17 of a total of 7,366 articles featuring 'agroecolog*' or 'sustainable intensification' with discourse analysis 18 of 7 selected highly cited articles on AE 19-25 and 5 on SI [26][27][28][29][30] (Fig. 1 and Methods). ...
Progress towards sustainable agriculture hampered by siloed scientific discourses
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2024
There is no consensus in society on how to achieve sustainability. Scientists’ limited experience in reflecting on their guiding assumptions, combined with a tendency to inflate their own research findings, hinders interdisciplinary dialogue and limits the usefulness of science. Through bibliometrics and discourse analysis, we analysed highly cited articles on agroecology and sustainable intensification. In broad terms, agroecology prioritizes diversity while sidelining productivity and adheres to relational epistemology, while sustainable intensification emphasizes boosting crop production while reducing environmental impact within a reductionist epistemology. Both discourses claim to have the solution to agricultural sustainability but are largely inexplicit about their guiding assumptions and their own limitations, and rarely engage with research in the other discourse. Interdisciplinary dialogue based on transparent and self-critical reflection on the assumptions and limitations of research could increase the relevance of science in societal dialogues about alternative pathways towards sustainable agriculture.
View
... Agroecology aims to improve land productivity by maximizing production per hectare through ecosystem synergies (Bernard & Lux, 2017). The intensification of agroecology can contribute to environmental preservation and sustainable agricultural transformation, particularly in SSA. ...
Feminist Agroecology: Towards Gender-Equal and Sustainable Food Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2025
Agriculture is pivotal in the global economy but is challenged by unsustainable practices that harm the environment and aggravate social inequalities, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Women, making up half the agricultural workforce, often do not benefit equitably from their labour due to systemic gender inequalities. Applying a Feminist Political Ecology (FPE) lens reveals the unequal gendered power dynamics that influence access to resources, decision-making, and the distribution of benefits within agricultural value chains. In a narrative literature review, I integrate FPE principles with agroecological approaches to address gaps in understanding gender dynamics within food systems and highlight positive outcomes from integrating FPE, such as improved crop diversity, food security, and economic stability, while acknowledging challenges like entrenched gender norms, intersecting inequalities, and resistance to change. I explore how gender-sensitive agroecology can promote sustainable and equitable food systems and examine how patriarchal systems marginalize women in agriculture, restricting their access to resources and decision-making. The analysis asserts ongoing debates around the scalability of gender-sensitive agroecological approaches and the challenges of implementing FPE insights within existing policy frameworks. Identified gaps include the need for more longitudinal studies on the impacts of FPE-informed interventions and greater attention to women's diverse experiences across different agroecological zones. Overall, this review contributes to academic discourse and policy discussions, seeking to advance a critical understanding of gender equality and sustainable agriculture in smallholder farming.
View
... The conversion of forests, meadows, or wetlands into arable land Sustainability 2024, 16,11080 3 of 23 will result in the loss of valuable products (wood, fibres, energy), on the one hand, and the loss of ecosystem functions (carbon sequestration, carbon storage, water cycle regulation, and biodiversity) on the other. Hence, expanding agricultural land at the expense of other valuable ecosystems is not perceived as an ecological and feasible option [34]. A possible scenario is to allocate part of the land used for feed purposes to production intended directly for human consumption, while reducing food waste [35]. ...
The Potential Impact of the European Green Deal on Farm Production in Poland
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2024
The proposed changes in the European Green Deal require the restructuring of the agricultural sector throughout the European Union. Particularly crucial for the agri-food industry are “From Farm to Fork” strategies and new legislation “for biodiversity,” which are an integral part of the European Green Deal. From an environmental perspective, changes are required immediately, but at the same time, they may reduce agricultural production in Poland. Therefore, this study aims to assess the potential consequences of implementing the European Green Deal principles on Polish agriculture’s productivity. The study is based on two key assumptions which involve a 50% reduction in the use of plant protection products and a 20% reduction in fertilisation. The conducted analyses rely on data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). The results were obtained by constructing a panel regression model for farms of different economic sizes. Although the most significant reduction in production value may concern the largest farms (using the most fertilisers and plant protection products), the smallest farms may experience the most critical difficulties. The potential decline in crop production in Polish agriculture could be stopped by implementing modern technologies enabling the development of precision and digital agriculture 4.0.
View
... Building such systems may require changes in agriculture, as well as in food distribution, processing, and consumption, to make food products more equitable, fairer, and safer, while also promoting rural development and reducing environmental degradation [1][2][3][4]. In this context, among many proposals, agroecology appears to be able to address the implications of sustainability of the current agrifood systems [5][6][7][8][9]. ...
How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review
Article
Full-text available
  • Nov 2024
The "agroecological transition" has emerged as a framework that aims to explain the complex changes taking place in agrifood systems. This study offers a mapping of the emergence of this framework, and aims to demonstrate that the agroecological transition can refer to different perspectives beyond the simple combination of two concepts. We carried out a bibliometric analysis of 298 articles (2012-2023), searched using the command "agroecologic* transition*". We used VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20), which is able to reveal clusters of co-citations of the most cited authors and articles. This result, in turn, indicates the existence of different perspectives on the use of agroecological transitions. Four clusters were found: (i) "Techniques and Practices", represented by articles that document the agroecological transition as an expression of specific agricultural techniques and practices; (ii) "Transition Theory", which employs the emerging theory and its conceptual contributions; (iii) "Transition Criteria", which involves the use of criteria to monitor the transition; and (iv) "Political and Social", made up of articles that explore the political and social movement dimension of agroecology. Each of these clusters, and their approaches, contribute different interpretations of agroecology itself, indicating the emergence of a new framework capable of attributing new meanings to it.
View
... This is rarely the case because donors often either reduce agroecological approaches to the biophysical dimension or avoid it because it does not fit into the existing investment modalities looking for quick, tangible returns on investment [84]. Lastly, as other authors stated, a narrow focus on production alone is unlikely to eradicate global hunger and poverty: increasing the access of farmers to land, water, seeds, and fair markets, empowering local communities, fostering knowledge exchange, reducing food waste and post-harvest losses, and reconsider consumption patterns is of fundamental importance [85]. ...
Closing the crop yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems in Kenya: Long-term trial research indicates agronomic viability
Article
Full-text available
  • Nov 2024
The production gap between current and attainable yields is highest on Africa’s smallholder farms, and some studies indicate that they might not benefit from the yield gains offered by conventional farming. Simultaneously, alternative farming systems like organic provide biodiversity and soil fertility advantages, but their ability to produce sufficient food is still under debate. Additionally, comparative data on the productivity of organic versus conventional in tropical regions are scarce or short-term. We investigated the crop productivity of organic and conventional farming systems using 15 years in two long-term systems comparison trials in Kenya. The trials were established in 2007 at two sites in the Central Highlands of Kenya. At each site, conventional and organic systems were compared at high input levels. The trial involved a three-year crop rotation cycle of maize, vegetables, legumes, and potatoes, repeated five times since its establishment. Management practices were kept similar in the first four rotations and revised in the fifth to improve systems representing best practices. Our results showed that while maize and baby corn had relatively low yield gaps ( 13 to +12 %) between organic and conventional systems, cabbage, French beans, and potato had high yield gaps ( 50 to 30 %). We attributed this to nutrient limitations and higher pest and disease damage. The yield gap could partially be closed by adopting best practices in the organic system, including system diversification and effective soil fertility, nutrient, and integrated pest management.
View
Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Obstacle Factor Analysis of Rural Modernization Development Level in China
Article
  • Mar 2025
Rural modernization constitutes a crucial aspect in the modernization of socialism with Chinese characteristics. This paper assesses the level of rural modernization in China and investigates its spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and restrictive factors through a spatial autocorrelation analysis and the obstacle degree model. The research indicates that: (1) The overall rural modernization has escalated, with infrastructure and public services advancing at the fastest pace, while the modernization of the ecological environment and governance system lags relatively behind. The majority of provinces exhibit distinct internal imbalances and classified development traits, mainly categorized as the ecological priority type and economic priority type. (2) The eastern coastal areas and the southwest region have witnessed rapid development due to their well-established infrastructure and agglomeration of innovative elements; the northwest and northeast regions have developed slowly, influenced by geographical conditions and industrial structure. Regions exhibit the characteristics of both high and low agglomeration in multiple dimensions. (3) The modernization of governance systems and the ecological environment serve as the primary constraints, manifested as a low percentage of administrative villages, insufficient planning, excessive use of pesticides and fertilizers, and a low greening rate. Hence, it is necessary to address the shortcomings, optimize the spatial layout, and strengthen grassroots governance capacities to promote the coordinated advancement of rural modernization.
View
View
View
View
The Agroecological Transition of Farms in the Ecuadorian Andes Through the Lens of the Main Agroecological Structure
Article
  • Nov 2024
Many sectors of society have urged a transition from modern conventional agriculture to more sustainable alternatives. One of the most frequently mentioned is agroecology, due to its potential to improve soil health, promote agrobiodiversity, food sovereignty, and regenerate ecosystem functions. However, complex systems such as farms demand the transformation of a broad set of characteristics and practices for its transition. These factors are, in turn, conditioned by social, educational, economic, and political factors. Therefore, a clear understanding of the main drivers behind the management of farms is vital for supporting an effective transition. This research applied the main agroecological structure (MAS) methodology, which employs 10 indicators (5 biological, 5 cultural) to evaluate the degree of connectivity of a farm with the landscape, the agrobiodiversity present in living fences and crops, and the practices employed by farmers to support and preserve it. Finally, the MAS methodology gives farms a score from 0 to 100, understood as the degree of development of its agroecological structure, or as the “resilience” of a system in agroecological transition. Measurements were performed in 20 farms with different degrees of agroecological transition, in five locations of the northern‐central Andean region of Ecuador. The farms had a moderately developed structure on average (71.05 over 100), and MAS variation was not correlated to the size of the farm, nor with its degree of connectivity with the surrounding landscape. It was rather significantly related to the geographic location of the study site. One of the main differences between study sites was a more extended prevalence of cooperation and development programs, suggesting a strong connection between the development of agroecological practices and capacity building processes. For this reason, the author proposes that MAS measurements should be complemented with deeper analyses of the capacity‐building background of each site. This study aims to establish a baseline of the MAS in Ecuador, and to provide new tools for monitoring and supporting agroecological transition.
View
Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2009
Agroecology involves various approaches to solve actual challenges of agricultural production. Though agroecology initially dealt primarily with crop production and protection aspects, in recent decades new dimensions such as environmental, social, economic, ethical and development issues are becoming relevant. Today, the term 'agroecology' means either a scientific discipline, agricultural practice, or political or social movement. Here we study the different meanings of agroecology. For that we analyse the historical development of agroecology. We present examples from USA, Brazil, Germany, and France. We study and discuss the evolution of different meanings agroecology. The use of the term agroecology can be traced back to the 1930s. Until the 1960s agroecology referred only as a purely scientific discipline. Then, different branches of agroecology developed. Following environmental movements in the 1960s that went against industrial agriculture, agroecology evolved and fostered agroecological movements in the 1990s. Agroecology as an agricultural practice emerged in the 1980s, and was often intertwined with movements. Further, the scales and dimensions of agroecological investigations changed over the past 80 years from the plot and field scales to the farm and agroecosystem scales. Actually three approaches persist: ( 1) investigations at plot and field scales, ( 2) investigations at the agroecosystem and farm scales, and ( 3) investigations covering the whole food system. These different approaches of agroecological science can be explained by the history of nations. In France, agroecology was mainly understood as a farming practice and to certain extent as a movement, whereas the corresponding scientific discipline was agronomy. In Germany, agroecology has a long tradition as a scientific discipline. In the USA and in Brazil all three interpretations of agroecology occur, albeit with a predominance of agroecology as a science in the USA and a stronger emphasis on movement and agricultural practice in Brazil. These varied meanings of the term agroecology cause confusion among scientists and the public, and we recommend that those who publish using this term be explicit in their interpretation.
View
Convergence or Divide in the Movement for Sustainable and Just Agriculture
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2012
‘Greening’ the green revolution will not be sufficient to reduce hunger and poverty and conserve biodiversity. The increasing cost of oil and fertilizers, and the deterioration of the climate and global ecology are key factors that undermine the capacity of humankind to feed itself. This phenomena became evident when the ‘perfect storm’ occurred in 2008 with the alarming rise in the cost of food that sent an additional 75 million people to the world’s line of hungry people. Disregarding the above issues the ruling international agricultural class continues asserting that food production will have to be increased by 70% by the year 2050. The threat to global food insecurity is the direct result of the industrial model of agriculture ­characterized by large-scale monocultures tailored for the export markets. We need an alternative agricultural development paradigm, one that encourages more ­ecologically, biodiverse, sustainable and socially just forms of agriculture.
View
Agroecology Scaling Up for Food Sovereignty and Resiliency
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Oct 2012
The Green Revolution not only failed to ensure safe and abundant food production for all people, but it was launched under the assumptions that abundant water and cheap energy to fuel modern agriculture would always be available and that climate would be stable and not change. In some of the major grain production areas the rate of increase in cereal yields is declining as actual crop yields approach a ceiling for maximal yield potential. Due to lack of ecological regulation mechanisms , monocultures are heavily dependent on pesticides. In the past 50 years the use of pesticides has increased dramatically worldwide and now amounts to some 2.6 million tons of pesticides per year with an annual value in the global market of more than US$ 25 billion. Today there are about one billion hungry people in the planet, but hunger is caused by poverty and inequality, not scarcity due to lack of production. The world already produces enough food to feed nine to ten billion people, the population peak expected by 2050. There is no doubt that humanity needs an alternative agricultural development paradigm, one that encourages more ecologically, biodiverse, resilient, sustainable and socially just forms of agriculture. The basis for such new systems are the myriad of ecologically based agricultural styles developed by at least 75% of the 1.5 billion smallholders, family farmers and indigenous people on 350 million small farms which account for no less than 50% of the global agricultural output for domestic consumption.
View
Agroecology, Food Sovereignty and the New Green Revolution
Article
Full-text available
  • Sep 2012
In the face of recurrent global food crises, institutions of the corporate food regime propose a new Green Revolution coupled with a continuation of neoliberal economic policies. Because these are causes of the crises to begin with, this approach can worsen rather than end hunger. Building a countermovement depends in part on forging strong strategic alliances between agroecology and food sovereignty. Agroecologists face important choices between reformist and radical versions of agroecology. The former version attempts to co-opt agroecology into the Green Revolution; the latter centers agroecology within a politically transformative peasant movement for food sovereignty.
View
Mainstreaming Agroecology: Implications for Global Food and Farming Systems.
Book
Full-text available
  • Oct 2013
The challenge of feeding the world’s growing population without further damaging the natural resource base is becoming increasingly urgent, and must be met in ways that also allow adaptation to and mitigation of climate change. Agriculture provides not only food, but also fuel, fibre and a wide range of ecosystem services. This paper discusses the principles and practices of agroecology, and how mainstreaming them can potentially meet the challenges facing agriculture and food production. The academic discipline of agroecology emerged over a century ago. Subsequently, in response to the social and environmental problems caused by the global industrial agricultural and food system, it has become the foundation of both a set of land management practices and a vibrant social movement. The science of agroecology is the study of living organisms and their inter-relationships in the context of agriculture and land use, and can be seen as the scientific basis of sustainable agriculture. Agroecology not only defines, classifies and studies agricultural systems from an ecological and corresponding socio-economic perspective, but also applies ecological concepts and principles to the design and management of sustainable agro-ecosystems. This means that it is very useful as a theoretical and practical approach to increasing the sustainability of current agri-food systems. Agroecology has come to greater prominence since the publication of the 2009 International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) which advocated the use of agroecological approaches in sustainability initiatives. The following year, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food also highlighted agroecology as a viable approach for working towards food security. Although informed citizens and markets are powerful mechanisms for shaping resource use and production, and for stimulating creativity and innovation by communities, concerted government action is needed to speed up the spread of agroecological production, especially while some countries are still moving their agricultural sectors in the opposite direction. Supportive policies will be required if crop and livestock production systems are to be managed as ecosystems, with management decisions fully informed of environmental costs and benefits. This discussion paper concludes with an agenda for change to support the wider use of agroecological approaches in the arenas of research, policy, and knowledge management and agricultural extension. In summary, - Agricultural policy should focus on building a progressive, knowledge-based agricultural sector which fosters the participation of all stakeholders to deliver strong support, extension and education services for agroecological technologies. - Economic policy should create market conditions – including financial and regulatory mechanisms – that are favourable to rural and urban agro ecological production, and develop improved markets for ecosystem services to provide incentives for their conservation and support for farming communities. - Cross-sectoral policies addressing food, markets and rural and urban development should include the development of robust frameworks for assessing and evaluating existing food production systems that focus on their ecological integrity and socio-economic benefit, and use these as a basis for evidence-based policy. - Knowledge management and agricultural extension should prioritise exchange of knowledge on agroecological management practices between all stakeholders by building regional, national and international information resources and networks. - Research should address the implications of agroecological management in different cultural and environmental settings, both urban and rural, and further develop agroecological production techniques. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Michel Pimbert and Phil Harris for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper, Martin Stott of the Fund for the Environment & Urban Life (The Oram Foundation, Inc.) and the Grand Challenges Fund at Coventry University for their financial support, and HRH the Prince of Wales for writing the Foreword. Citation: Wibbelmann, M., Schmutz, U., Wright, J., Udall, D., Rayns, F., Kneafsey, M., Trenchard, L., Bennett, J. and Lennartsson, M. (2013) Mainstreaming Agroecology: Implications for Global Food and Farming Systems. Centre for Agroecology and Food Security Discussion Paper. Coventry: Centre for Agroecology and Food Security. ISBN: 978-1-84600-0454
View
Agroecology What it is and what it has to offer
Article
Full-text available
  • Jun 2014
In a context of a changing climate and growing concerns for more healthy food systems, agroecology is gaining momentum as a scientific discipline, sustainable farming approach and social movement. There is growing anecdotal and case study evidence of its multiple benefits, from climate resilience to farm productivity. Yet its promotion in public agricultural policies, research and extension is still limited. This paper explores why this is. It calls for consolidating the evidence base for agroecology through multi-dimensional tools that not only measure yields, but also its many other benefits: economic, environmental and social. Mainstreaming agroecology will require a fundamental cultural and philosophical shift in how we as a society define‘productive’ and ‘efficient’ agriculture. http://pubs.iied.org/14629IIED.html?c=foodag
View
View
View
Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems, second edition
Book
  • Jan 2006
Providing the theoretical and conceptual framework for this continually evolving field, Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems, Second Edition explores environmental factors and complexities affecting agricultural crops and animals. Completely revised, updated, and reworked, the second edition contains new data, new readings, new issues and case studies, and new options. It includes two completely new chapters, one on the role of livestock animals in agroecosystems and one on the cultural and community aspects of sustainable food systems.The author clearly delineates the importance of using an ecosystem framework for determining if a particular agricultural practice, input, or management decision contributes or detracts from sustainability. He explains how the framework provides the ecological basis for the functioning of the chosen management strategy over the long-term. He also examines system level interactions, stressing the need for understanding the emergent qualities of populations, communities, and ecosystems and their roles in sustainable agriculture. Using examples of farming systems in a broad array of ecological conditions, the book demonstrates how to use an ecosystem approach to design and manage agroecosystems for sustainability.
View
View