ArticlePDF Available

Analysis of Benefits, Advantages and Challenges of Building Information Modelling in Construction Industry

Authors:

Abstract

Building Information Modelling (BIM) has become a well-known established extensive collaborative process and an important area of development in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry and has transcended all disciplines. The use of BIM in construction projects can possibly increase the information quality needed for making critical design decisions to access a building‘s environmental impact. Analysis, design and infrastructure of buildings are formulated with the help of samples generated from BIM. In the last decade, BIM has witnessed an increasing development. This was a result of their rapid capabilities applicable to construction projects. BIM can generate a common language for all divisions of parties and systems in a project and make them a combined team. The BIM method is strongly matched with delivery systems for integrated projects. Harnessing the unrealized possibility of the full life cycle use of the model by integrating it with the amenities and property management phases of buildings and infrastructure is one of the advantages of BIM which makes it suitable to the industry. This analysis is intended to show the correspondence of BIM and project manager‘s roles on construction projects. It insists on the significance of proper knowledge and experience of project managers to get succeeded in BIM. Initially, this review presents an in-depth analysis of present literature frameworks and surrounding methodologies to assess and examine the BIM advantages and static design. Then 3D, 4D BIM and BIM based scheduling techniques are examined. The use of the term 4D to refer to the fourth dimension time is also discussed. i.e. 4D is 3D + schedule (time). The role of 4D BIM is to add a novel dimension to 3D CAD or solid modelling. The paper also reviews the issues regarding the BIM implementation, static design and intrinsic problems related with an attempt to assess the advantages in a purely quantitative fashion. Through the application of BIM technology for the dynamic querying and statistical investigation of construction schedules, engineering, resources and costs are the three implementations considered to be proved as how BIM can ease the extensive grasp of a project‘s implementation and progress. Recognition, conflict solving, contradictions between construction resources and control costs, decreasing project over-spends and protecting the resource supply are also dealt with. A BIM overview with specifications on its core and cycle concepts, benefits of the project life with the help of surveys has been discussed. The paper also elaborates risks and obstacles in BIM implementation and future BIM trends.
Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2) 2016, pp. 1-11
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +919443558554
Email address: pauldiaz71@gmail.com (P.M.Diaz)
Double blind peer review under responsibility of DJ Publications
http://dx.doi.org/10.18831/djcivil.org/2016021001
2455-3581© 2016 DJ Publications by Dedicated Juncture Researcher‘s Association. This is an open access
article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 1
REVIEW ARTICLE
Analysis of Benefits, Advantages and Challenges of Building Information
Modelling in Construction Industry
*P.M Diaz1
1Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ponjesly College of Engineering, Kanyakumari,
Tamil Nadu, India.
Received-23 January 2016, Revised-22 February 2016, Accepted-21 March 2016, Published-28 March 2016
ABSTRACT
Building Information Modelling (BIM) has become a well-known established extensive
collaborative process and an important area of development in the Architecture, Engineering and
Construction (AEC) industry and has transcended all disciplines. The use of BIM in construction
projects can possibly increase the information quality needed for making critical design decisions to
access a building‘s environmental impact. Analysis, design and infrastructure of buildings are
formulated with the help of samples generated from BIM. In the last decade, BIM has witnessed an
increasing development. This was a result of their rapid capabilities applicable to construction
projects. BIM can generate a common language for all divisions of parties and systems in a project and
make them a combined team. The BIM method is strongly matched with delivery systems for
integrated projects. Harnessing the unrealized possibility of the full life cycle use of the model by
integrating it with the amenities and property management phases of buildings and infrastructure is
one of the advantages of BIM which makes it suitable to the industry. This analysis is intended to
show the correspondence of BIM and project manager‘s roles on construction projects. It insists on the
significance of proper knowledge and experience of project managers to get succeeded in BIM.
Initially, this review presents an in-depth analysis of present literature frameworks and surrounding
methodologies to assess and examine the BIM advantages and static design. Then 3D, 4D BIM and
BIM based scheduling techniques are examined. The use of the term 4D to refer to the fourth
dimension time is also discussed. i.e. 4D is 3D + schedule (time). The role of 4D BIM is to add a
novel dimension to 3D CAD or solid modelling. The paper also reviews the issues regarding the BIM
implementation, static design and intrinsic problems related with an attempt to assess the advantages
in a purely quantitative fashion. Through the application of BIM technology for the dynamic querying
and statistical investigation of construction schedules, engineering, resources and costs are the three
implementations considered to be proved as how BIM can ease the extensive grasp of a project‘s
implementation and progress. Recognition, conflict solving, contradictions between construction
resources and control costs, decreasing project over-spends and protecting the resource supply are also
dealt with. A BIM overview with specifications on its core and cycle concepts, benefits of the project
life with the help of surveys has been discussed. The paper also elaborates risks and obstacles in BIM
implementation and future BIM trends.
Keywords: Construction projects, Solid modelling, BIM, 3D CAD, Scheduling.
1. INTRODUCTION
There are various problems in
construction industries related to construction
costs, low-carbon emissions, environment-
friendly constructions, green buildings, social
responsibility, natural ecologies and welfare.
Building Information Modelling (BIM) is one
of the ways for changing the approaches to
project maintenance, design and construction.
The BIM Handbook [1] defined BIM as a
technology of computer-aided modelling for
the purpose of managing construction project
information concentrating on building
information, models, production,
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
2
communication and analysis. The committee
for National Building Information Model
Standard Project (NBIMS) defined BIM as ―A
BIM is a digital representation of physical and
functional characteristics. It helps in shared
knowledge resource for information about a
facility forming a dependable source for
decisions in the course of its lifespan from
beginning onwards.‖ This review paper defines
sustainable design as the design processes and
practices that contribute to sustainable patterns
of living throughout the built environment
based on the method of ‗triple bottom-line‘. An
example of a shift from steady notions to
regenerative influences is provided. BIM build
environment accounts for the ecological, social
and economic health of the place. To attain
this, common understanding among several
stakeholders is required. A move from an
isolated and static building performance
understanding in terms of design discourse to
an extensive and dynamic discourse that
encourages an understanding of the building
lifecycle implications on occupant lives and
business success will involve and preserve
stakeholder dedication [2].
In this analysis, the applications of
BIM which contain visualization, three
dimensional coordination, prefabrication,
construction planning and monitoring,
estimation of cost and model for record are
discussed in detail. The tools of BIM are
analysed by means of a prototype 3D and 4D
house model. Moreover, BIM is analysed as
the main generator for 4D scheduling.
Although tools used for BIM results in some
shortcomings such as issues in interoperability,
the application of BIM is very beneficial to the
construction managers.
The purpose of this analysis is to
address this issue by quantitatively comparing
BIM treatments with non-BIM treatments in an
actual BIM embedded project. For the
accomplishment of this objective, a review of
BIM based on a real plan containing
measureable and profitable proof has been
provided. As construction concerns a wide
activities range with dissimilar natures, it is
evenly important to establish methodological
protocols and metrics to evaluate the
performance and benefits derived from any
specified aspects.
With current legislation stipulating the
minimum necessities for sustainability, this is
inevitably perceived by project teams as
supplementary to the primary goals and
budget. [3] refers to [4] and the suggestion for
sustainability is given by a meaningful
comment as ‗novel concepts and tools that are
integrative and synthetic, non-disciplinary and
analytic and that vigorously generates synergy,
not just summation‘.
The purpose of this paper is to provide
an overview of BIM concept, uses, advantages,
risks and related challenges in AEC industry.
This is followed by analysis of BIM benefits
for project stakeholders namely proprietors,
designers, constructors and facility managers.
Then the risks and barriers of BIM to be
implemented in the AEC industry are
explained. Finally, the BIM features are
analysed.
2. TECHNOLOGY OF BIM
As indicated in figure A1, a Building
Information Model (BIM) consists of a 3D
project model linking design, planning,
construction and operation [5]. The BIM idea
arises from the object-oriented parametric
modelling technique [6]. The term
―parametric‖ defines a procedure by which the
assembly is automatically adjusted to preserve
a previously found relationship [7, 8]. The
main difference between BIM conventional 3D
and CAD technology is that the latter labels a
building by independent 3D views such as
elevations, plans and sections while the former
does not label in such a manner.
According to the BIM regulation of
planning [9], the plan for BIM construction of
Wuhan New City International Expo Centre is
created. Based on the construction plan, the
model of BIM is figured out as shown in figure
A2. Based on the purpose of operation, the
characteristics are embedded into the model of
BIM.
3. BIM PROCESS
BIM can be observed as a virtual
process where all features are encompassed
and disciplined. Systems of a facility within a
distinct, virtual model permit all team
members to co-operate better than the
traditional processes. Today, BIM is perceived
only as advertising for software companies.
BIM can be regarded both as software and an
integrated method which is shown in figure A3
[10]. On the other hand, the applications of
BIM are practised in industries such as
construction, information technology, and
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
3
software and hardware fields. While
considering the Building Information
Modeling (BIM), 3D model is mostly
considered to be fake. It must be noted that
BIM is fundamentally a data package. It
involves all information about construction,
design, buildings management and
renovations. 3D model is one of the several
possible ways of this information description.
Recently the concept of Integrated
Project Delivery (IPD) emerged as a natural
companion to BIM. In the US, [11] the IPD
has become a favoured project delivery system
for all main projects involving BIM. Figure A4
illustrates the contrast between the
―traditional‖ and ―BIM‖ process.
4. STUDY OF BIM TOOLS
The main part of this review is the
study of the benefits and uses of building
information models in construction projects.
4.1. 3D modelling of a house
[12] It was downloaded from the
website of Autodesk‘s student community to
develop a model for 3D house. At first, a novel
Revit file is created and saved. Then, the walls
for the perimeter are created. Once the
perimeter walls are finished, the interior walls
are formed. After that, [13] the foundation
walls, flooring, windows, doors, stairs, deck,
roof are created. Moreover, the rooms are
tagged. For this no mechanical, electrical,
plumbing elements are required. The 3D
modelling and 2D drafting differences are
reviewed. Also, the object granularity
including the elements decomposition is
explored [14].
4.2. 4D modelling of a house
4D modeling requires a 3D model
development and schedule. The 3D model is
created in [12]. The Microsoft project uses a
method of critical path to create the schedule.
Synchro‘s 4D BIM tool was downloaded
through its website. In [15] it is used as the
existing model integrator in IFC format and in
the Microsoft project in xml format. Once the
model and the schedule are introduced into the
tool of Synchro‘s integration [16], the
resources of IFC which are the building
elements list are connected. Once the
connecting of 4D is finished, focused time and
animation can be used to generate videos of the
4D model. Finally, the video file can be
exported. From the analysis [17] tools do not
offer the 072-9 information essential to create
a 4D visualization of the project progress. For
this problem, the solution is 4D BIM, which is
created by mixing the 3D BIM with project
schedule. It permits the 3D simulation of a
building and its mechanisms. It can assist in
problems prediction and calculating the
quantities of material.
5. FEATURES OF BIM TECHNOLOGY
There are some specific aspects of
BIM that helps in their effective
implementation in project management. These
attributes, developed progressively can be
explained as follows [18]:
5.1. Constructability
BIM helps the team members of a
project in reviewing and handling
constructability and RFIs issues. Furthermore,
visual information can be provided from an
advantage point focussing on problems
occurred. All these information associated with
mark-up helps in finding solutions and
mitigating risks.
5.2. Investigation
Another aspect of BIM helps project
managers, engineers and designers to do more
examinations and provide better decisions [19].
By connecting BIM tools, it would be enough
to investigate the construction project energy
consumption and to find improved solutions
such as varying orientation, mass and space of
materials etc. Furthermore, analysis of light,
mechanics and acoustics can also be performed
by BIM [20].
5.3. Quantity take-off
Quantity take-offs are very useful for
project managers and teams to study their
choice and have dependable insight into
several alternatives throughout the lifecycle of
the project. Since there is availability of an
opportunity between the database and BIM
model a correct estimation can be received
much faster. Additionally, these items for take-
off can be used easily in procurement process
[21].
6. MANAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
Construction is the significant part of
all projects [22]. These projects can be either
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
4
retail projects or small residential projects of
mega multifunction. The construction project
management requires an understanding of
modern management knowledge of different
construction procedures. With the variations in
organizational procedures, technology and new
methods, the process of construction
management differs [23]. Management of
construction project refers to a sequence of
activities in order to determine the conduction
work flow in the life cycle. Similar to Project
Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK),
the manager handles planning of project
management, cost, quality, time, contract
administration, risk and safety management.
The manager is also the communication
authority between investors, designers, owners,
engineers, professional crew and
administrative staffs [24]. Normally,
management of construction project shares the
common and overall properties of general
projects. Hence, the rules and approaches
necessary for the management of general
projects can be applied to this type of projects.
Aggregating the related data cost later,
the database which involves engineering data
dispersed among several industries is shown in
figure A5. Based on the database, figure A6
illustrates how people from different
departments and sectors are permitted to
involve in the management of materials via the
database for BIM.
7. PROJECT CONSTRUCTORS
General contractors adopt BIM
compared to all other stakeholders [25]. The
BIM can be used by the contractors and
subcontractors for the following uses [26]. (1)
Cost estimation and quantity take-off, (2) Early
design error identification, (3) Analysis for
construction planning, (4) Onsite verification
and construction tracking, (5) Offsite
modularization and prefabrication, (6) Site
conservation planning, (7) Value engineering
and (8) Better communication with designers,
owners, subcontractors and workers. [27]
Hence the following advantages are achieved
by the constructors. (1) Improved profitability,
(2) Good customer service, (3) Schedule and
cost compression, (4) Better production quality
and (5) Good decision making. The project
architect develops the architectural model. The
2D structural and MEP system drawings are
acquired by prime contractors from project
engineers and converted them into 3D BIM
models [28]. All ―single‖ BIM models are
integrated through detections of clash in the
phase of preconstruction. The prime contractor
is able to save $259,000 roughly as
demonstrated in figure A7.
8. CHALLENGES
In the current review, [29] shows that
if there is disbelief among the project team
members about the importance and benefits of
BIM on construction projects, satisfactory
results will not be obtained. [30] shows that
BIM‘s top investment areas include hardware,
software and interior collaborative
development BIM workflow. [31] states that
the BIM challenges can be categorized as 1)
technical challenges, 2)skills and training
challenges 3)legal procedural challenges and
4) economy which can obstruct the firms from
upgradation of their available systems to a
system which is BIM oriented.
Certain quasi-tangible advantages in
the construction industry are information
availability, productivity and improved
decision making capability. The intangible
advantages include competitive benefits,
market access and better risk management
[32]. Challenges of the imperceptible
considerations include the calculation of
monetary terms. These studies are viable to
estimation and instinct. Moreover, these
advantages are mined from business
procedures and purposes. The independent
expression to support system objectives are not
provided [33]. Lack of formal methodologies
or procedures to establish a BIM business case
results in uneven speculation and improper
estimation. Approaches have been put forward
to assess the information systems. But most of
them are prescriptive and reactive in nature,
depending on perception values.
9. BENEFITS AND ADVANTAGES OF
BIM
Various construction project
management sources recognize certain BIM
advantages which are indicated as follows [34]
Better performance and quality of the
project
Improved productivity
Reduction of wastages
Faster delivery
New opportunities for revenue and
business
Low construction cost
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
5
If BIM is considered as a centralized
source, it can enable persons involved in the
construction industry to get the same data
version. Consequently the communication risk
of project managers can be mitigated [35, 36].
Analysis of feasibility and design concepts,
results in improved quality and performance of
the building. It is the key to achieve the BIM
benefits in the pre-construction phase. Further
automatic low-level alterations and accurate
design of visualizations are required during
transitions. Generation of 2D drawings,
multiple design parties collaboration,
extraction of cost estimation, sustainability
improvement and energy efficiency are the
advantages in the design phase of the
construction project. BIM design, detect and
synchronize errors, construct and design
omissions and planning, use design models as
a base for fabricated components and also
enable lean construction techniques.
Furthermore, BIM would implement improved
operation facilities and post construction phase
management.
There are different BIM tools that have
been established to tackle sustainability
concerns in the construction procedures from
design inception to facility management [37-
41]. These technologies can assist in attaining
the outcomes specified by sustainable
assessment methods. The mechanistic
approach required to achieve the credits fail to
arrest and may result in denial of humanistic
and developmental benefits BIM may bring in
terms of dialogic stakeholder engagement,
common understanding and values
internalisation in sustainability. BIM is very
often depicted in the process of design and
construction although the whole lifecycle
should be in the preview of BIM
implementation. The application of building
information modelling enables reducing the
challenges of interoperability and integration
for facility management [42, 43].
10. CONCLUSION
The studies show both the BIM
advantages and disadvantages. The project
recommends BIM application to construction
managers with a note on the challenges of
using BIM tools. The construction components
and scheduling progress are run by BIM based
4D scheduling which results in good
construction planning. Additionally, building
information modelling tools examine the
enhanced usage of 3D, 4D and model
scheduling. This specifies the definite forward
movement of the construction industry along
with BIM and BIM tools. Therefore, BIM can
be regarded as a decision-making tool despite
it being technical equipment. This viewpoint is
the outcome of an extensive BIM description.
In construction projects similarities between
the role of a project manager and BIM require
clear understanding of the BIM concepts.
Aimed at this purpose, BIM should be included
in the construction curriculum. A brief
explanation of project management should be
given for scholars who intend to pursue
positions in project management as their
profession.
REFERENCES
[1] Chuck Eastman, Paul Teicholz, Rafael
Sacks and Kathleen Liston, BIM
Handbook: A Guide to Building
Information Modeling for Owners,
Managers, Designers, Engineers and
Contractors, Second Edition, Wiley,
USA, 2011, pp. 1-648.
[2] Umit Isikdag, Building Information
Models: An Introduction, Enhanced
Building Information Models, 2015,
pp. 1-12,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-
21825-0_1.
[3] Umit Isikdag, The Future of Building
Information Modeling: BIM 2.0,
Enhanced Building Information
Models, 2015, pp. 13-24,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-
21825-0_2.
[4] Yusuf Arayici, Building Information
Modeling, Bookboon Publisher,
Denmark, 2015, pp. 1-261.
[5] Willem Kymmell, Building
Information Modeling: Planning and
Managing Projects with 4D CAD and
Simulations, McGraw-Hill
Construction Series, USA, 2008.
[6] Salman Azhar, Building Information
Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits,
Risks, and Challenges for the AEC
Industry, Leadership and Management
in Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2011,
pp. 241-252,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.
1943-5630.0000127.
[7] Ahmad Jrade and Farzad Jalaei,
Integrating Building Information
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
6
Modeling with Sustainability to
Design Building Projects at the
Conceptual Stage, Building
Simulation, 2013, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp.
429-444,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-
0120-0.
[8] Kristen Barlish and Kenneth Sullivan,
How to Measure the Benefits of BIM
A Case Study Approach,
Automation in Construction, Vol. 24,
2012, pp. 149-159,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
2.02.008.
[9] Jian Li, Ying Wang, Xiangyu Wang,
Hanbin Luo, Shih-Chung Kang, Jun
Wang, Jun Guo and Yi Jiao, Benefits
of Building Information Modeling in
the Project Lifecycle: Construction
Projects in Asia, International Journal
of Advanced Robotic Systems, Vol.
11, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-11,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58447.
[10] Jan Fridrich and Karel Kubecka, BIM
The Process of Modern Civil
Engineering in Higher Education,
ProcediaSocial and Behavioural
Sciences, Vol. 141, 2014, pp. 763-767,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014
.05.134.
[11] Salman Azhar, Malik Khalfan and
Tayyab Maqsood, Building
Information Modeling (BIM): Now
and Beyond, Construction Economics
and Building, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2012,
pp. 15-28,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v12i4.3
032.
[12] Sungchul Hong, Jaehoon Jung,
Sangmin Kim, Hyoungsig Cho,
Jeongho Lee and Joon Heo, Semi-
Automated Approach to Indoor
Mapping for 3D as-Built Building
Information Modeling, Computers,
Environment and Urban Systems, Vol.
51, 2015, pp. 34-46,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvur
bsys.2015.01.005.
[13] Pu Ren, Mingquan Zhou, Guoguang
Du, Wuyang Shui and Pengbo Zhou,
3D Scanning Modeling Method
Application in Ancient City
Reconstruction, International
Conference on Optical and Photonic
Engineering, Singapore, 2015,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2189604.
[14] Hyojoo Son, Jongchul Na and
Changwan Kims, Semantic As-Built
3D Modeling of Buildings Under
Construction from Laser-Scan Data
Based on Local Convexity without an
As-planned Model, Proceedings of the
32nd International Symposium on
Automation and Robotics in
Construction, Oulu, Finland, 2015, pp.
1-6.
[15] Nashwan Dawood and Sushant Sikka,
Measuring the Effectiveness of 4D
Planning as a Valuable
Communication Tool, International
Journal of Information Technology in
Construction, Vol. 13, 2008, pp.620-
636.
[16] Timo Hartmann, Ju Gao and Martin
Fischer, Areas of Application for 3D
and 4D Models on Construction
Projects, Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Vol.
134, No. 10, 2008, pp. 776-785,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733
-9364(2008)134:10(776).
[17] Sagar Malsane and Amey Sheth,
Simulate Construction Schedules using
BIM 4D Application to Track
Progress, International Conference on
International Institute of Engineers and
Researchers, London, United
Kingdom, 2015, pp.10-15.
[18] Rebecca Jing Yang, Overcoming
Technical Barriers and Risks in the
Application of Building Integrated
Photovoltaics (BIPV): Hardware and
Software Strategies, Automation in
Construction, Vol. 51, 2015, pp. 92-
102,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
4.12.005.
[19] Sha Liu, Xianhai Meng and Chiming
Tam, Building Information Modeling
Based Building Design Optimization
for Sustainability, Energy and
Buildings, Vol. 105, 2015, pp. 139-
153,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.201
5.06.037.
[20] J.Gomez-Romero, F.Bobillo, M.Ros,
M.Molina-Solana, M.D.Ruiz and
M.J.Martín-Bautista, A Fuzzy
Extension of the Semantic Building
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
7
Information Model, Automation in
Construction, Vol. 57, 2015, pp. 202-
212,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
5.04.007.
[21] Clifton B.Farnsworth, Simon
Beveridge, Kevin R.Miller and Jay
P.Christofferson, Application,
Advantages and Methods Associated
with using BIM in Commercial
Construction, International Journal of
Construction Education and Research,
Vol. 11, No. 3, 2015, pp. 218-236,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15578771.20
13.865683.
[22] Atul Porwal and Kasun
N.Hewage, Building Information
Modeling (BIM) Partnering
Framework for Public Construction
Projects, Automation in Construction,
Vol. 31, 2013, pp. 204-214,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
2.12.004.
[23] Xiangyu Wang and Heap-Yih Chong,
Setting New Trends of Integrated
Building Information Modeling (BIM)
for Construction
Industry, Construction Innovation,
Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, pp. 2-6,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2014-
0049.
[24] V.Paul C.Charlesraj, Anil Sawhney,
Manav Mahan Singh and Aiswarya
Sreekumar, BIM Studio - An
Immersive Curricular Tool for
Construction Project Management
Education, Proceedings of the
International Symposium on
Automation and Robotics in
Construction, Oulu, Finland, 2015,
pp.1-8.
[25] Hyun Woo Lee, Hyuntak Oh,
Youngchul Kim and Kunhee Choi,
Quantitative Analysis of Warnings in
Building Information Modeling (BIM),
Automation in Construction, Vol. 51,
2015, pp. 23-31,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
4.12.007.
[26] Eric M.Wetzel and Walid Y.Thabet ,
The use of a BIM-Based Framework to
Support Safe Facility Management
Processes, Automation in
Construction, Vol. 60, 2015, pp. 12-
24,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
5.09.004.
[27] Seul-Ki Lee, Ka-Ram Kim and Jung-
Ho Yu, BIM and Ontology-Based
Approach for Building Cost
Estimation, Automation in
Construction, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 96
105,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
3.10.020.
[28] Jian Li, Lei Hou, Xiangyu Wang, Jun
Wang, Jun Guo, Shaohua Zhang and
Yi Jiao, A Project-Based
Quantification of BIM Benefits,
International Journal of Advanced
Robotic Systems, Vol. 11, No.
1, 2014,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58448.
[29] Shady Attia, Mohamed Hamdy,
William O‘Brien and Salvatore
Carlucci, Assessing Gaps and Needs
for Integrating Building Performance
Optimization Tools in Net Zero
Energy Buildings Design, Energy and
Buildings, Vol. 60, 2013, pp. 110-124,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.201
3.01.016.
[30] Christoph Merschbrock and Bjorn Erik
Munkvold, Effective Digital
Collaboration in the Construction
Industry A Case Study of BIM
Deployment in a Hospital Construction
Project, Computers in Industry, Vol.
73, 2015, pp. 1-7,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.20
15.07.003.
[31] Ammar Dakhil and Mustafa Alshawi,
Client's Role in Building Disaster
Management through Building
Information Modeling, Procedia
Economics and Finance, Vol. 18,
2014, pp. 47-54,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-
5671(14)00912-5.
[32] John Rogers , Heap-Yih
Chong and Christopher Preece,
Adoption of Building Information
Modeling Technology (BIM):
Perspectives from Malaysian
Engineering Consulting Services
Firms, Engineering, Construction and
Architectural Management, Vol. 22,
No. 4, 2015, pp. 424-445,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-
2014-0067.
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
8
[33] David Bryde, Marti Broquetas and
Jurgen Marc Volm, The Project
Benefits of Building Information
Modeling (BIM), International Journal
of Project Management, Vol. 31, No.
7, 2013, pp. 971980,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.20
12.12.001.
[34] Youngsoo Jung and Mihee Joo,
Building Information Modeling (BIM)
a Framework for Practical
Implementation, Automation in
Construction, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2011, pp.
126-133,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
0.09.010.
[35] Ang Yu Qian, Benefits and ROI of
BIM for Multi-Disciplinary Project
Management, National University of
Singapore, Singapore, 2012, pp 1-45.
[36] Wilson W.S.Lu and Heng Li, Building
Information Modeling and Changing
Construction Practices, Automation in
Construction, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 99-
100,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
0.09.006.
[37] Agnese Travaglini, Mladen
Radujkovic and Mauro Mancini,
Building Information Modeling (BIM)
and Project Management: a
Stakeholders Perspective,
Organization, Technology &
Management in Construction: An
International Journal, Vol.6, No.2,
2014.
[38] Salman Azhar, Wade A.Carlton,
Darren Olsen and Irtishad Ahmad,
Building Information Modeling for
Sustainable Design and LEED® Rating
Analysis, Automation in Construction,
Vol. 20, No. 2, 2011, pp. 217-224,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
0.09.019.
[39] L.Mahdjoubi, C.A.Brebbia and
R.Laing, Building Information
Modeling in Design, Construction and
Operations, WIT Transactions on the
Built Environment, WIT Press,
Southampton, United Kingdom, 2015.
[40] Yunfeng Chen, Hazar Dib and Robert
F.Cox, A Measurement Model of
Building Information Modeling
Maturity, Construction Innovation,
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2014, pp.186-209.
[41] Jaehyun Park, Junglo Park, Juhyung
Kim and Jaejun Kim, Building
Information Modeling Based Energy
Performance Assessment System: An
Assessment of the Energy
Performance Index in Korea,
Construction Innovation, Vol. 12, No.
3, 2012, pp. 335-354.
[42] Peter E.D.Love, Junxiao Liu, Jane
Matthews, Chun-Pong Sing and Jim
Smith, Future Proofing PPPs: Life-
Cycle Performance Measurement and
Building Information Modeling,
Automation in Construction, Vol. 56,
2015, pp. 26-35,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.201
5.04.008.
[43] Julie Emerald Jiju, Complications of
Construction in Metro Based on
Planning and Management, Journal of
Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 1,
No. 1, 2015, pp. 18-24,
http://dx.doi.org/10.18831/djcivil.org/2
015011004.
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
9
APPENDIX A
Adapted from [5] Figure A1.A Schematic representation of BIM model
Adapted from [9]
Figure A2.BIM model of Wuhan new city international expo centre
Adapted from [10] Figure A3.Process of transitions CAD vs. BIM
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
10
Adapted from [11]
Figure A4.Difference between ―traditional‖ process and ―BIM‖ process [11]
Adapted from [28]
Figure A5.A BIM model database establishing the process of materials installation
Adapted from [28]
Figure A6.Configuration diagram of the BIM database for management of materials
P.M.Diaz./Journal of Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2(2), 2016 pp. 1-11
11
Adapted from [11] Figure A7.BIM applications in the stage of project preconstruction
... This paper addresses a timely gap in the literature concerning the probability of successful BIM implementation in the Canadian construction sector by developing a FBN model. The study leveraged literature-identified BIM implementa- Affordable cost for implementation (Smith 2014;Criminale and Langar 2017) Adequate BIM experts (Migilinskas et al. 2013;Vass and Gustavsson 2017) Government motivation (Diaz 2016;Lindblad 2019) Training for employees (Migilinskas et al. 2013;Lindblad and Guerrero 2020) Advantages of implementing BIM (Smith 2014;Langar 2017) Project delivery stakeholder readiness ...
... Affordable cost for implementation (Criminale and Langar 2017) Adequate BIM experts (Migilinskas et al. 2013) Client motivation (Vass and Gustavsson 2017;Lindblad and Guerrero 2020) Government motivation (Diaz 2016;Lindblad 2019) Training for employees (Migilinskas et al. 2013;Lindblad and Guerrero 2020) Advantages of implementing BIM (Smith 2014;Langar 2017) Technology compatibility BIM product databases and libraries (Smith 2014;Criminale and Langar 2017) BIM interoperability (Eadie et al. 2013;Lindblad 2019) BIM-related research (Migilinskas et al. 2013;Criminale and Langar 2017) Contract management BIM protocols and legal contracts (Smith 2014;Lindblad 2019) BIM-based standards (Migilinskas et al. 2013;Miettinen and Paavola 2014) BIM implementation guidelines (Miettinen and Paavola 2014;Vass and Gustavsson 2017) BIM-related research (Migilinskas et al. 2013;Criminale and Langar 2017) tion drivers to predict the overall likelihood of successful adoption using the FBN framework. Key factors were identified that require immediate attention due to their pivotal role in ensuring the success of BIM implementation. ...
... Within this study, client readiness is considered as the readiness of the project owners, such as the investors, regional governments, and municipalities. For the clients to be ready to implement BIM in their projects, affordable BIM implementation costs, motivation from the government, and expert users are required (Diaz 2016;Criminale and Langar 2017;Vass and Gustavsson 2017). Project delivery stakeholder readiness is considered the BIM implementation readiness of stakeholders (e.g., contractors, consultants, and suppliers). ...
Article
Full-text available
Building information modeling (BIM) adoption has been recognized as a promising development within the construction industry. While BIM offers significant advantages for managing the entire lifecycle of construction projects, its uptake in the Canadian construction sector remains limited. This study employs Bayesian belief networks (BBN) to evaluate the factors influencing the successful implementation of BIM in Canada. Key drivers were identified through a comprehensive literature review, while occurrence probability data were gathered from Canadian construction professionals and analyzed using BBN. The results of this cross-sectional analysis indicate that under current conditions, the probability of successful BIM implementation is relatively low. To improve the likelihood of successful adoption, addressing the shortage of critical BIM resources is essential. The proposed BBN framework serves as a prototype for assessing BIM implementation success across various regions, providing valuable insights for industry stakeholders
... BIM refers to a method of receiving information about construction projects in the design and pre-construction phases [15]. To Diaz, BIM refers to the means of changing the age-long approaches to building, designing and maintaining construction projects [16]. Diaz adds that BIM has a virtual process, with all encompassed and disciplined features. ...
... Diaz adds that BIM has a virtual process, with all encompassed and disciplined features. For the present study, these require SM for betterment [16]. ...
... Diaz [16] Propels performance, efficiency and productivity in construction ...
Article
Full-text available
Construction projects are faced with a range of challenges. These can be addressed significantly by combining Building Information Modeling (BIM) and strategic management (SM) right from planning to execution phases of construction projects. This study argues that these two problem-solving mechanisms can be leveraged in combination for the attainment of efficient planning and execution of construction projects. It draws evidence from secondary data, sourced from the internet and subjected to systematic review and thematic and content analyses. The descriptive analysis done proves BIM and SM to be indeed capable of ensuring efficient planning and execution of construction projects, when duly deployed and the constraints to their application tackled sufficiently. The study concludes that the combination of BIM and SM produces more results and guarantees efficient planning and execution of construction projects much more than when either of them is used alone. Organizations and institutions are charged to resort to combining these strategies as well as others in finding solutions to problems such as those confronting construction projects.
... When past research in related fields was considered, it was decided that an adequate number of respondents for this study would be 165. In previous research that focused on BIM implementation and environmental risk assessment, sample sizes ranging from 100 to 200 were found to provide statistically significant findings (DIAZ, 2016;Tagliabue and Ciribini, 2018;. Sample sizes less than 100 did not produce statistically significant results. ...
... The table presents information on the factor loadings of observed variables (variables) on each identified component (Factors 1 to 4). The intensity and direction of the association between each observable variable and its associated latent component are reflected by the factor loadings of the variables (Mahamadu et al., 2017;DIAZ, 2016). ...
... • The numbers that are outside of the diagonal reflect the correlations that exist between the various constructs. For instance, the correlation between "BIM-Driven Environmental Risk Assessment" (ER) and "BIM-Enabled Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance" (EE) is 0.33, which indicates that these two constructs have a somewhat favorable association with one another (DIAZ, 2016;. • Due to its primary emphasis on the links between the constructs, the table does not include the correlations between observable variables and the relevant constructs they are associated with. ...
... · Zakari et al. (2014) identified driving factors and barriers to BIM implementation, while Rokooei (2015) underscored necessities and challenges associated with BIM in project management (Rokooei, 2015;Zakari et al., 2014). Recent studies, such as those by Diaz (2016) and Doumbouya et al. (2016), evaluate the tangible benefits of BIM and its capacity for enhancing construction project effectiveness (Diaz, 2016;Doumbouya et al., 2016). · Further contributions from Latiffi et al. (2016) delineated the roles and responsibilities of construction stakeholders employing BIM, while Fadeyi (2017) addressed its role in sustainable building practices (Fadeyi, 2017;Latiffi et al., 2016). ...
... · Zakari et al. (2014) identified driving factors and barriers to BIM implementation, while Rokooei (2015) underscored necessities and challenges associated with BIM in project management (Rokooei, 2015;Zakari et al., 2014). Recent studies, such as those by Diaz (2016) and Doumbouya et al. (2016), evaluate the tangible benefits of BIM and its capacity for enhancing construction project effectiveness (Diaz, 2016;Doumbouya et al., 2016). · Further contributions from Latiffi et al. (2016) delineated the roles and responsibilities of construction stakeholders employing BIM, while Fadeyi (2017) addressed its role in sustainable building practices (Fadeyi, 2017;Latiffi et al., 2016). ...
... The correlation analysis revealed that staff capability positively influences organizational knowledge-support systems. Diaz [21] analyzed the BIM applications in the AEC industry, focusing on its advantages, benefits, barriers and the integration of time and cost dimensions for asset life cycle management. The study identified several barriers to BIM implementation, including technical issues, high training needs, legal obstacles, and economic difficulties associated with system upgrades. ...
... 3,4 This pervasive waste, spanning diverse sectors, presents complex environmental challenges. 5 Recycling emerges as a pivotal solution, offering a multitude of benefits such as resource conservation, diminished CO 2 emissions, and bolstered economic competitiveness. [6][7][8] The concrete industry, notably cement, is highlighted as having a significant contribution to environmental harm and carbon emissions. ...
Article
This study introduces a novel approach to enhance the durability and strength of concrete by integrating abrasion and cement slurry treatments on surface-treated recycled coarse aggregates (STRCA). Initial abrasion treatment removes aged mortar from the recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) surface, while subsequent cement slurry modification provides a fresh surface, reinforcing the bond with the concrete matrix. Through detailed material analyses including x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive x-ray, microstructural changes are evaluated alongside compressive strength, drying shrinkage, electrical resistivity, and chloride ion penetration of STRCA-based concrete. Results indicate significant improvements in mechanical properties and durability as the treatments eliminate mortar and enhance the inter-facial connection with cement paste. Notably, a substantial 29.37% strength enhancement is observed at 25% replacement (STRCA 25), demonstrating treatment efficacy. While a reduction of 11.58% occurs at 100% replacement (STRCA 100), up to 75% replacement shows minimal strength loss, with optimal enhancements at 50% replacement. Additionally, STRCA concrete exhibits lower drying shrinkage (11%-20% reduction) and increased electrical resistivity (28%-36% rise), indicating improved durability at 100% replacement. Enhanced resistance to chloride ion penetration is also evident, with a 22%-28% increase at 100% replacement compared to conventional RCA. Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of dual treatments for enhancing concrete properties using STRCA.
Article
This study conducts a comparative analysis between a Business Information Modeling (BIM)-based and traditional cost estimation methods on the building structure of the Guntung Payung Banjabaru Health Center, Banjabaru City. The Tekla Structures (TS) software is utilized to carry out structural work calculations, including concrete, steel, and iron work, as well as the AHSP/HSPK working drawings from 2021. The BIM analysis results regarding the calculation time and cost differences were compared with the calculation results obtained with Microsoft Excel and AutoCAD. The two methods’ findings demonstrate that the cost difference is 12% for the concrete work and 13% for the iron/rebar work. It can be concluded that the BIM cost estimation method is more efficient, because its processing time is shorter and the calculation results are closer to the project needs compared to the conventional method.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose – Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology has been well received by the Malaysian construction industry, yet the adoption rate is extremely slow. Many areas of adoption issues and know how regarding BIM were investigated. However, no prior research has considered the perspective from engineering consulting services (ECS) firms. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the overview and adoption of BIM from the perspective of Malaysian ECS firms, with its objectives first, to determine the perceptions, barriers, governmental support and intentions in adopting BIM, and second, to identify the key drivers for adopting BIM within two years. Design/methodology/approach – The primary data were collected from focus group interview and questionnaire survey to achieve the first objective, and subsequently, the second objective was achieved based on Pearson relationship analysis. Findings – The results show that the firms have a concept of BIM that equates to industry authorities’ norms; yet the lack of well-trained personnel, guidance and governmental supports were identified as the main barriers to adoption. Nevertheless, the firms were prepared to adopt BIM where market demands and competitive advantage were the main drivers to adoption within two years. Originality/value – A different perspective has been highlighted in adoption of BIM. It renders a new insight into the effective adoption and use of BIM from the ECS firms’ perspective.
Article
Full-text available
Construction projects are becoming much more complex and difficult to manage. As a response Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has been developing at a very fast pace. The major shift in ICT for the Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) sector is the spreading of Building Information Modeling (BIM) (Bryde, Broquetas, & Volm, 2013). BIM is a system and its main objective is the managing of the information and because of that it is also a project management matter. Our research work is originated from the understanding of the managerial relationship gap between the two realities of BIM and project management. In particular this paper aims at addressing this gap from a specific perspective: stakeholders. Stakeholder management is one of the most important project critical success factors, as project success highly depends on stakeholders' satisfaction. The goal is relevant for both practitioners and educators. The exploration is done mainly through the literature review, but it is also strongly supported by the collection of primary data. The second source regards direct interviews to a portfolio of stakeholders of the AEC industry, e.g. project managers, architects, BIM experts, software resellers, building developer owners, innovation managers. The findings regard the classification of the key stakeholders in BIM adoption and the contextual situation in the different European countries, with particular focus on the role of the Governments.
Article
Full-text available
In the construction industry, research is being carried out to look for feasible methods and technologies to cut down project costs and waste. Building Information Modelling (BIM) is certainly currently a promising technology/method that can achieve this. The output of the construction industry has a considerable scale; however, the concentration of the industry and the level of informatization are still not high. There is still a large gap in terms of productivity between the construction industry and other industries. Due to the lack of first-hand data regarding how much of an effect can be genuinely had by BIM in real cases, it is unrealistic for construction stakeholders to take the risk of widely adopting BIM. This paper focuses on the methodological quantification (through a case study approach) of BIM's benefits in building construction resource management and real-time costs control, in contrast to traditional non-BIM technologies. Through the use of BIM technology for the dynamic querying and statistical analysis of construction schedules, engineering, resources and costs, the three implementations considered demonstrate how BIM can facilitate the comprehensive grasp of a project's implementation and progress, identify and solve the contradictions and conflicts between construction resources and costs controls, reduce project over-spends and protect the supply of resources.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The building construction stakeholders need to become more proactively involved in making buildings resilient to a wide range of disaster threats (Bosher, 2013). Clients in particular can play a vital role in the resilience of building disaster (Smart Market 2011). Building Information Modelling (BIM) is seen as a new technology, providing highly accurate information which can help to improve building disaster management. In this article a new conceptual framework will represent the relationship between BIM application benefits and the client organisation maturity levels. This framework will help the clients to fully understand and monitor the BIM benefits in building disaster management.
Article
Building information modeling (BIM) and related digital innovations can serve as a catalyst for more transparency, tighter integration, and increased productivity in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Yet, many project teams struggle with how to work based on the new technology. Collaborative design based on shared information systems like BIM requires changing traditional and institutionalized work practices and routines. A case study of integrated BIM design in a large healthcare construction project serves as an example for how commonly experienced challenges can be overcome. The project has been awarded BuildingSMART's 2015 award for 'outstanding open BIM practice' making it Norway's role model for BIM practice. Based on diffusion of innovations theory, we identified the following set of key factors enabling digital collaboration in this project: change agents, new roles and responsibilities, a cloud computing infrastructure, BIM contracts, and a BIM learning environment. The findings presented in this article may serve as an example for BIM implementation and collaborative work in construction projects.
Article
Purpose – There is a growing requirement for a rating system of building information modelling maturity (BIMM) to compare the effectiveness of modelling processes in construction projects. The literature related to BIMM contains theoretical proposals and description of their maturity models. However, the research efforts are limited and lacking substantial theoretical and empirical justifications. This paper is a unique attempt to integrate previous models by performing empirical investigations of key factors for measuring BIMM in construction projects. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A national survey was designed to extract the perception of 124 BIM-related practitioners and academicians about the conceptual model. Then, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to identify and test the key factors underlying the 27 areas. Findings – A principal component factor analysis of the collected data had suggested a five-factor model, which explained 69.839 per cent of the variance. The construct validity of the model was further tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicated that all factors were important in measuring BIMM; however, compared with the factors of technology and people, more emphasis was put on the factors of process and information. Originality/value – The key value of the paper is to increase the understanding of multi-dimension nature of BIMM through empirical evidence and to provide practitioners and researchers with the insight regarding particular emphasis on the factors related to modelling process and information.
Article
Theoretical developments in Building Information Modelling (BIM) suggest that not only is it useful for geometric modelling of a building's performance but also that it can assist in the management of construction projects. The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which the use of BIM has resulted in reported benefits on a cross-section of construction projects. This exploration is done by collecting secondary data from 35 construction projects that utilised BIM. A set of project success criteria were generated and content analysis was used to establish the extent to which each individual project met a criterion. The most frequently reported benefit related to the cost reduction and control through the project life cycle. Significant time savings were also reported. Negative benefits were mainly focused on the use of BIM software. Cost/benefit analysis, awareness raising and education and training are important activities to address the challenges of BIM usage.