Content uploaded by Bronwyn P Wood
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Bronwyn P Wood on Feb 02, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
24:1 (2016) 59–81
Copyright © IIUM Press
ISSN 0128-4878 (Print); ISSN 2289-5639 (Online)
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: An Islamic
critique
Anke Iman Bouzenita* and Aisha Wood Boulanouar**
Abstract: Abraham Maslow’s model of the hierarchy of needs is pervasive
in many academic specialisations. After a short description of the model, this
article summarises the existing criticisms. While criticism on the empirical
validity of the model and its ethno-centricity are frequently mentioned in
the literature, the authors of this article give special focus on the missing
consideration of the spiritual aspect of human existence in Maslow’s model. The
of the model from its substance and using it simply as a commodity) and the
non-consideration of Maslow’s later changes. Special focus is laid on the usage
capitalist perspective so completely through, particularly, advertising but also
through the conceptualisation of people. The article describes the model’s
of both its foundations and its usage. The study concludes that attempts at
harmonising the model with the higher objectives () of the do
not do justice to either model.
Keywords: Hierarchy of needs; ;marketing; Maslow
spirituality.
Abstrak: Penggunaan Model Abraham Maslow tentang hierarki keperluan
adalah cukup berleluasa dalam kebanyakan pengkhususan akademik. Selepas
penerangan ringkas model tersebut, artikel ini meringkaskan kritikan-kritikan
* Anke Iman Bouzenita is an Associate Professor in the Department of Islamic
Sciences, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.
Email: bouzenita@squ.edu.om. ()
** Aisha Wood Boulanouar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
Marketing, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos
University, Oman. Email: aboulanouar@squ.edu.om.
60
yang sedia ada. Kritikan terhadap kesahihan emipirik model tersebut di samping
isu yang berorientasikan etnik kerap diperbincangkan dalam sorotan litertur.
Namun, pengarang kertas kerja ini memberikan fokus yang khas terhadap
pertimbangan yang tidak terdapatnya aspek kerohanian dalam kewujudan
manuasia bagi model Maslow tersebut. Kertas kerja ini membincangkan sebab-
sebab model tersebut dilihat sebagai satu komoditi (memisahkan model daripada
bahan dan menggunakannya sebagai satu komoditi) dan bukan menjadi satu
pertimbangan untuk perubahan model Maslow. Tumpuan khusus diberikan atas
penggunaan model ini dalam pemasaran, berdasarkan kedudukannya sebagai
satu bidang yang merangkumi perspektif kapitalis sepenuhnya, terutama sekali
bagi bidang pengiklanan. Tetapi ia juga melihat pembentukan konsep manusia
itu sendiri. Artikel ini menerangkan kepelbagaian penerimaan model tersebut
dalam kalangan para akademik Islam. Ia memberikan kritikan secara Islam
terhadap asas dan penerimaannya. Kertas kerja ini cuba untuk mengharmonikan
() yang lebih tinggi lagi; namun ia tidak dapat memberikan keadilan
kepada kedua-dua model tersebut.
Kata Kunci: Hierarki keperluan; ; pemasaran, Maslow;
kerohanian.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs – developed in the 1950’s in the U.S. by
Abraham Maslow, son of Ukrainian Jewish immigrants – is a pervasive
published in 1954, “has been one of the most
The model has persisted ever since in psychology, education, economics,
marketing, management, sociology, political science, and others. It has
refers predominantly to the U.S., it cannot be denied that the model has
left an imprint on public consciousness wherever it is taught.
In the wake of Western hegemony and the academic proliferation of
study plans and contents, the hierarchy of needs model has gained worldwide
acceptance. Although very much embedded in capitalist ideology, its
universal validity is, most of the time, assumed; it is hardly taught in a
critical way that encourages discussion on its possible weaknesses.
It cannot be reconstructed whether Maslow has considered his
own model to be of universal nature, applicable worldwide. Recent
61
theorists have contended that Maslow did not intend his hierarchy to
Bridwell (1976) note, “Maslow postulated [in his own works] that his
or behaviours (p. 213, citing Maslow, 1970, p. 54). It seems, however,
instinctual nature of basic needs easily leaves the impression that his
(sometimes with a lack of consideration of their intellectual or societal
Marketing is particularly suitable for this purpose, as its own substance
concerns promoting a perspective, rather than the substance of an item,
and the reduction of that item or idea or experience to “what sells” being
intrinsic to it. This paper attempts to reconsider Maslow’s model and
academic circles.
A brief description of Maslow’s model
Maslow promoted a “humanistic” approach to studying humankind,
rejecting the “value-free, value-neutral, value-rejecting” (Maslow,
1971, p. 4) hegemony in the science of his time (and ours). As an atheist,
human experience by referring to the natural sciences for models without
consideration for the complexity and scope of human experience. In
developing his model, Maslow believed that “the growing tip” should
be modelled – those who were exceptional – to show humankind its
potential:
The growing tip is where all the action takes place, this is
where all the chromosomes are diving, where all the growth
processes are most vivid and most active. What I’ve done as
a technique is pull out the best specimen rather than sampling
the whole of the population (1971, p. 5).
Maslow attempted to derive “a psychology from healthy people rather
than sick ones” (Maslow, 1982, p. 235). The pyramid model seems to be
the most common representation of his model of the hierarchy of needs
62
with the exceptional right at the top, occupying and personifying the
“self-actualisation” level. Maslow himself never seems to have used the
Maslow’s “Hierarchy of Needs” model appealed very widely as “it
provides both a theory of human motives by classifying basic human
needs in a hierarchy, and a theory of human motivation that relates
According to Westwood (1992) in Loh et al. (2000, p. 3), the model is
based on three main principles:
1.
tension, motivating action towards satisfaction. This assumes a
to predominate (Maslow, 1970, p. 293).
2. The Prepotency Principle – the needs must be met in their
ascending order, and only after each lower stage needs are at
least partially met, can the next higher stage needs be pursued
(Maslow, 1982, p. 236).
3. The Progression Principle - physiological needs, such as food,
shelter and warmth must be met before a person will look to
needs further up the pyramid (Maslow, 1982, p. 236).
maintained that all levels of needs are interdependent (Maslow, 1970, p.
97), whilst asserting that they are prepotent and progressive. The model
has been taken into “operation” without attention being paid to this last
note on interdependence. Similarly, consideration of Maslow’s later
development of the model – which made it much less neat, has also not
been operationalised (Koltko-Rivera, 2006). In fact, Loh et al. (2000)
contend that, “despite overwhelming evidence that the intrinsic nature
of the theory does not work, its relevance stems not from the feasibility
of the theory, but from the “usability” of the theory” (p. 21).
Business subjects – Economics and Management, and from them,
their theories and research on the hard sciences. However, in some
areas of business, such as Management and Marketing, the inevitable
63
in these areas on people – as workers, as owners, as buyers, as sellers,
as suppliers. As such, anthropology, sociology, education and especially
psychology, have been mined for theories and models.
In business, Maslow’s model is still taught as a textbook fundamental
(for example, Kotler’s
1957 and now in its 16th edition and Robbins’ (2013), now
in its 12th edition). The model has also been widely used especially with
worker productivity (e.g. Jerome, 2013; Ramprasad, 2013; Jarkas,
an eye-pleasing pyramid, both appeals to people’s “common sense”
and is easy to understand and explain. It can be seen in action in
advertising campaigns, which frequently leverage a “perceived need
gap” and the tension surrounding it to evoke purchase. In addition,
it can be perceived right through to the so-called “corporate social
responsibility” initiatives by businesses where employees are allowed a
half-day a month to do community work such as help out with reading
in schools or working for the disabled. These programmes have the
bring bottom line (i.e. monetary) rewards (Shauki, 2011), consistent
Dierent critiques of Maslow’s model
The model has been criticised as ethnocentric and also as “self-
aggrandising” in the self-actualisation stage – a stage which resulted in
There have been ample criticisms on its empirical validity. Maslow, in
fact, made limited personal observations the basis of his model (as he
64
mentioned himself, he only took into consideration model behaviour
sections of even American society at the time he formulated his model.1
Most of the conceptual and validity criticisms have focused on
two foundations of the model: the model’s reliance on “Western”
individualism as opposed to more collectivist societal forms of
organisation, and its ethno-centricity. Hofstede (1984, pp. 389–398)
criticises the model for its ethno-centricity (Loh, 2000). Hofstede’s own
research on “universal” values highlights factors like individualism
versus collectivism, large or small power distribution, the degrees of
uncertainty avoidance, masculinity versus femininity, and short and
long term orientation across a wide-range of cultures (Gambrel, 2003,
p. 144). Maslow used the observations of his immediate surroundings.
He formulated his model on the highly individualistic society of the
U.S. in the 1950s. He did not consider more collectivist societies
talking of the hierarchy of needs. Edwin C. Nevis (1983), an American
psychologist who taught organisational psychology in Shanghai,
developed his own: Nevis’s hierarchy of needs. Nevis realised that need
of individualism-collectivism as well as an ego-social dimension (Loh
et al., 2000, p. 9). Not unlike Maslow, Nevis never made empirical data
the foundation of his research (Loh et al., 2000). He did not test his
hierarchy with actual Chinese people.
Gambrel and Cianci (2003) have pointed out the limitations of
Maslow’s Western-based model by using his motivation theory model
in international management, contrasting it with the special needs of
a more collectivist culture such as China’s. The authors state that the
three most well-known content theories, including Maslow’s hierarchy
of needs, Herzberg’s two-factor theory, and McClelland’s three-factor
theory, have all been developed by American theorists. These theorists
used only American subjects in their research (Gambrel, 2003). The
problem of universalisation seems therefore quite common. This
approach to cross-cultural research remains prevalent today, for as
Smith (1999) states, “research in itself is a powerful intervention, which
dominant group in society” (p. 176). Cofer and Apply (1964) pointed
65
the views of many prominent theory-building psychologists of the
Bridwell, 1976, p. 236).
(Chinese) collectivist approach is to be expected in view of the
concentrated attempts at creating new models applicable in economic
relations between “West” (here: the U.S.) and “East” (here: China) (Loh
et al., 2000).
(2003) criticises Maslow’s model with regard to its “hierarchical
unidimensionality” and “cross-cultural validity”, developing what he
human needs in terms of their relative potency in a non-linear model
and distinguished between collectivistic and individualistic needs. It is
interesting to observe that the criticism of Maslow’s model that seems
to be given most attention to is the one that promises more success
the mere insight into truth and falsehood is not a primary motif in the
deliberations.
Commodication of the model and Maslow’s later changes
Koltko-Rivera gives ample consideration to the later version of Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs model, which places “self-transcendence as a
motivational step beyond self-actualization” (2006, p. 302). The author
mentions a number of important consequences of this re-consideration
for theory and research, among them the integration of spirituality into
the mainstream of psychology, and a more multiculturally integrated
approach to psychological theory (p. 302). Koltko-Rivera describes “the
typical textbook version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs” as “seriously
306):
The later model places the highest form of human
and its needs are transcended. This represents a monumental
shift in the conceptualization of human personality and its
development. … At the level of self-transcendence, the
individual’s own needs are put aside, to a great extent, in
66
favor of service to others and to some higher force or cause
conceived as being outside the personal self (pp. 306-307).
Koltko-Rivera’s paper is not only interesting with regard to Maslow’s
later version (as postulated in a number of public lectures held from 1967
1971), and why it never found the appreciation it deserves, but also
with regard to the methodology of (humanist) psychology itself, with
the latter being vested in the structure of modern psychology and its
non-recognition of spirituality.
According to Koltko-Rivera, the misconception of the later
version is so persistent that “there is no mention of self-transcendence
as a motivational status distinct from self-actualization in almost any
textbook treatment of Maslow’s theory” (p. 307). Reasons for this
relate to Maslow having little opportunity to publicise the amended
and inherent reasons relating to the structure of psychology and
its unwillingness to give credit to spirituality in peoples’ lives and
“stigmatize serious researchers of religion” (p. 309). Perhaps this is
why Maslow added, as a level higher than self-actualisation, a self-
transcendent level which operated as a “religion-surrogate” with “much
which pass as established religions” (Maslow, 1982). As part of this
theory development, Maslow proposed that a self-actualising individual
would experience an increase in the importance of self-actualisation
The second aspect, based on a review of some of Maslow’s journal
entries, reveals the limited scope of personal experience and observation
of the limited human behaviour that found access into model-making,
such as taking American presidents as samples. The very fact that
Maslow experienced an almost fatal heart attack in this later phase of
his life (1967) and the transcendental experience it involved may have
drastically shown him the limitations of human existence. Maslow’s
as being “determined (unconsciously) by the Jewish passion for ethics,
utopianism, Messianism, the prophetic thundering. My whole value-laden
philosophy of science could be called Jewish – at least by my personal
(Maslow, 1982, p. 233).
67
Maslow’s opinion that self-actualisation rarely happens, could
engage some criticism on the materialistic side of the “American
dream”. Maslow states:
There’s so little love in the US family, too. Is this because
of the narrowed-down blood family (instead of the extended
Of the clan? Of the oasis in a crappy world?). I’ve rarely
seen a happy marriage and a happy family. What did this do
to the kids? All the hopes pooped out. Not only the social
for a car or a house and then be miserable – smack up
against the inadequacies of materialism. Materialism is a
marvellous philosophy and it works beautifully. It’s sparked
revolutions and people have willingly died for it. you
even more so (Maslow, 1982, p. 221).
Maslow’s concerns with the unexpected emptiness of materialism have
also been a source of some interest in the academic literature (Solomon,
business. However, attempts to reconcile the cause of this lack of
2008).
Marketing has looked at this area intensively through the lens of
one of its founding theories – the globalisation thesis (Levitt, 1983).
This thesis contends that as people become wealthier and move
beyond concerns for basic needs they will expand their consumption
to include “global products” or “global brands”. The expending of
their newly acquired greater disposable income on these goods, would
represent a convergence of symbols and, therefore values – Western,
theorised universalised convergence of Western values was the belief
that secularism would be more and more widely adopted – indeed, this
is a stated premise of Inglehart’s World Values Survey, one of the most
extensive values data collections in the world (Hossli, 2007):
We’re dying from a lack of spirituality. The metapathologies,
the value disturbances. We can’t stand being poor or crippled
68
of diminished or evil human beings or being cowardly Jonahs.
We like ourselves. But this can never be achieved – it
earning it and deserving it, It’s awful to be a bastard; it’s
awful to be unloved; it’s awful to feel cheap, guilty, ashamed,
embarrassed (Maslow, 1982, p. 62).
Although Maslow calls for spirituality, he was doubtless aware that
within secular materialist Western academic scholarship his call would
not be taken up. In fact, the marginalisation of religious or spiritual
viewpoints in Western social sciences is inherent in its underlying
epistemological bias (Habib, 1993). The adoption of a spiritual, or even
a more spiritual, perspective in Western academic scholarship would
undermine the “rational science”, the objectivity of the research and,
as such, it would not meet the needs of the societal (capitalist) model.
Maslow’s locus of “spirituality” as a source has not been pursued
with any real vigour in the literatures. Habib (1993) puts this down to
the epistemological bias in Western academic scholarship which sees
adoption of the ethnocentric “globalisation thesis” (Levitt, 1983),
encouraged a myopia that was replicated across the social sciences.
De Mooij (2009) credits this to an ethnocentrism so deep that it goes
unnoticed, both by the countries of origin themselves, as well as those
countries the systems are exported to. This leads to on-going replication
of the same ideas, based on the same frameworks, and inherently holding
Obviously, although the secularisation anticipated by Inglehart and
others has not cascaded across societies, the commitment to the Western
view of humankind, also an inherent part of the bias of Maslow’s original
model, persists. This means that any reformulation of Maslow’s model
with the same premises cannot be successful, because the foundations
remain unsound.
Maslow in marketing: A case study
illustration of Maslow’s model. Not only is marketing, as it is enacted in
societies today, a product of the capitalist economic system, it also has a
long association and fascination with the hierarchy of needs.
69
As mentioned, Maslow’s model is used across business disciplines
and is a fundamental concept taught in introductory marketing courses
(see Kotler, for example). As a Consumer Behaviour topic, Maslow’s
hierarchy shows students how people are motivated to meet needs,
being unable to advance until lower-order needs are met. In advertising
and promotions courses, Maslow can be used to show how people, upon
noticing a perceived gap between their current state and ideal state, are
moved to act to put their lives back into balance.
Marketing itself is an organically Western discipline, an outgrowth
of economics developed in U.S. business schools in the 1960’s. As
such, given both the time and the locational context of its formation,
marketing is a product of Western individualist secular capitalism and,
Businesses developed in this environment exist solely to make
money for shareholders and can be said to have no obligation to ethical
considerations beyond what is legal, according to a civil system of
law (Alserhan, 2012). Capitalism itself challenges characteristics of
humankind as noble creations. “Humankind’s very being is related to
the amount of things humans can produce, the level of technological
development they can attain, and the degree to which they can
modernise consumer products. The role of the individual, then, is
greater consumption and a better standard of living” (Habib, 1993, p.
134).
Marketing is a mechanism established in and drenched with the
assumptions and biases of the superiority of a Western capitalist model.
It deals in perceptions, as opposed to realities, so despite the fact that
Maslow himself did not distinguish between needs and wants (Sheth
“growth” needs). The expansion of the “needs” category to include
number of purchases and repeated purchase. Therefore, attracting
customers as young as possible into the consumption cycle maximises
customer lifetime value – or number of purchases over the course of
friend characteristics, as is the case with branding, allows consumers
70
to feel they have relationships with products – proxies for Maslow’s
higher order needs (social, esteem, etc.).
Maslow’s model has been used very extensively in marketing to
leverage consumer perceived unmet needs and wants into sales. In fact,
a marketing paper has been written on this very topic (Soper, Milford,
that “the needs of a human being may seem insatiable” (1931, p. 365).2
He nevertheless divides them into two classes – absolute needs (related
to self) and relative needs (your situation compared to that of others).
Presentation of Maslow’s model to business students results in little
questioning. The model neatly serves the required training the workforce
needs to be good “citizens” in a capitalist economy (Habib, 1993). This,
despite the fact that this model, as many others, is intrinsically wrong
for leaving out the spiritual aspect of human life. In fact, to acknowledge
humankind as more than “consuming units”, the model would need to
be completely inverted, so that self-transcendence was the initial step,
shelter. The objective in this case is to increase the speed and rate of
consumption amongst humankind. This one-dimensional exploitation
of people brought about by peddling a one-dimensional view of human
beings is damaging both for the people themselves and their societies;
both in terms of societal development and the development of business
Muslims’ receptions of Maslow’s model
The following will attempt to give an overview of Muslim academics’
reception of the model. They may vary from positively uncritical to
harmonising to critical approaches.
Ali (1995) does not criticise Maslow’s model as such, but rather
addresses the humanist approach as a third force (after psychoanalysis
and behaviourism) it is embedded in. He sees humanist psychology as
a response to the shortcomings (“mass dehumanization”, p. 55) of the
preceding models (psychoanalysis and behaviourism), attempting to
give more importance to the human being by placing him at the centre
of deliberations. “Humans have limitless capacity for growth and self-
improvement; in a nutshell, man is his own god. Consequently, the aim
71
The humanist approach to the study of psychology meant to
many of its adherents adoption of a secular kind of humanism
and rejection of God, coupled with complete commitment
to the concept of the
energizes human action, with the ultimate goal of life being
-esteem and -actualization. The momentum for this
model of man was boosted by the fact that the economies of
the industrialized nations began to need consumers (p. 55).
is to be expected that the model found some amount of attention and
criticism within the Islamisation of the Human Sciences approach.
Ibrahim Ragab, in his 1997 paper entitled “Creative Engagement
“Theory of Metamotivation”, as an exceptional case for “describing
in very formal statements what clearly looks, in every way, like the
spiritual dimension of most religious teachings” (p. 44), even referring
to religious terminology, but being bound by the “cultural taboos of the
3 However, Ragab
criticises Maslow’s approach for asserting the rootedness of “spiritual
life” in the biological nature of the species, amounting to nothing but
higher animality (p. 44). Ragab states: “He [Maslow] thus imposes on
the reader his unwarranted and unsubstantiated denial of anything of
a supernatural nature. He gives us mere assertions in this particular
respect, without ever proving them” (p. 44).
Khaidzir, Anwar, and Hamsan (2011) mention Maslow’s model
as an example of the self-centeredness of humanist psychology. They
conclude:
Maslow believed that any human intelligence has the potential
to get to the point of self-actualization, but if the basic level
is not met, then it is a fatal failure to address human potential.
However, the question is could an intelligent man struggle to
beat the system with the lack of basic need? In many cases,
72
what are the things that cannot be provided by the basic need
of intelligence? (p. 200).
In her paper on “The Innovation of Human Nature in Islam”, Shadiya
Baqutayan mainly criticises the missing spiritual aspect in Western
viewing the “human as an evolving animal” (p. 172).
Other authors have attempted to relate the model to the
pattern, the higher objectives of the . One common approach
model, while failing to
relate either model to their original worldview.
Malek’s (2014) paper entitled “
Integration of Needs as Stipulated in Maqasid Syariah and Maslow’s
Assistance Business Programme.” The authors attempt to incorporate
,
into Maslow’s hierarchy of needs model into the theory of the higher
objectives of Islamic Law (referred to as “needs”). Referring to Rosbi
and Sanep, the authors equate Maslow’s concept of self-actualisation
both the Maslowian self-actualisation (ranking last) and “religion” as a
the question of the necessity to involve Maslow’s model for their
distribution scheme.
In a more critical approach, Alias and Samsudin (2005) declare
the Maslowian hierarchy of needs model as unsuitable to explain, for
instance, the Prophets’ Companions’ motivated behaviour “in neglecting
needs ()” (p. 13). They still consider the model as relevant, but
give preference to the principles of explaining this hierarchy using the
principles of : “Consistent with the training of
‘aqidah, ‘ibadah, and akhlaq in Makkah and Medina, the Sahabahs had
naturally prioritised religion over life, which is the correct hierarchy
of needs for Muslims” (pp. 13-14). Interestingly, the authors equate
with needs rather than objectives, adding: “The obvious
73
terms of content, is the inclusion of religion as a basic human need” (p.
10).
Explaining the dimensions of , Auda (2008) makes a similar
observation. He writes:
century’s Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of human (rather
than ‘divine’) objectives or ‘basic goals,’ which he called,
‘hierarchy of needs.’ Human needs, according to Maslow,
range from basic physiological requirements and safety, to
he revised his ideas and suggested a seven level hierarchy.
The similarity between al-Shatibi’s theory and Maslow’s
theory in terms of the levels of goals is interesting. Moreover,
the second version of Maslow’s theory reveals another
interesting similarity with Islamic ‘goal’ theories, which is
the capacity to evolve (p. 8).
Unfortunately, the equation is void of any substantial attempt at
identifying the different underlying worldviews as well as the
terminology. The or (higher) objectives of the
are defined as this and other worldly values or results that are
realised upon the implementation and following of Islamic legal
rules in their entirety. Scholars writing on the have, from
their assessment of numbers of specific legal rules and principles,
inferred that certain objectives are met through the implementation
of certain legal rules – like the protection of (the Islamic
way of life), life, intellect, offspring and wealth. The observation
of these objectives may play a role in , the derivation of
legal rules, and in questions deciding on the priority of actions.
Needs in the motivational understanding, on the other hand, are
rather unreflected, physical or innate, and stand at the beginning
(representing the motivation) of undertaking an action, they are not
the result of an action. In addition, the Muslim’s aim in pursuing
any activity is to achieve the pleasure of his Creator by following
His commandments, regardless of whether the named objectives
are met or whether he knows about them in the first place. It seems
that the commodification of both the Maslowian and the
model converge at this point in the literature.
74
Striking a balance: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs from an Islamic
perspective
Islam as a way of life, brought to life through its , acknowledges
procreation, just like the instinct of worship. It does not negate or
neglect any of these instincts and needs. It teaches the human being to
channel them, through the observance of the Islamic rules, towards his
way of life does not ask for or even condone the suppression of any of
these instincts at the expense of the other.
The demand to perform pure acts of worship, praying and fasting,
for instance, does not transgress the human’s capacities, and does not
family life. It is for this reason that there is no celibacy in the Islamic
system. The Prophetic Sunnah is reminiscent of asserting this balance.
from the Prophet (S.A.W.), on
of the Prophet’s wives (S.A.W.), asking them about his worship. When
they were informed about it, they seemed to belittle it, and said: “Who
are we in comparison to the Prophet (S.A.W.). All his preceding sins
and even those to happen have been forgiven. So one of them said: “I
will pray the entire night”, and the other said: “I will fast every day and
not break it” and the last said: “I will stay away from women and never
get married.” The Prophet (S.A.W.) came to them and said: Have you
said this and that? I am, by Allah, the most humble and Allah fearing
among you, but I fast and then break my fast, and I pray and sleep, and
I marry women. Whoever turns away from my Sunnah is not from me”
In a longer
and your family has a right over you, so fast and break your fast, and
209:4903).
It has been established by the Prophetic that every human
being has Islam as his human nature () when he is born. It is
only his parents who turn him into a Christian, Jew or Magian (al-
75
same everywhere, and this human nature has a strong spiritual need
it is trying to satisfy. A neglect of this need, as prevalent in secular
(Western) culture, or its complete annihilation (as was the case in
communist countries) leads to an imbalance, just as the sole focus on it,
as is prevalent in some religions, would.
Islam allows and stimulates trade, professional life, and economic
activity. It does lay down clear guidelines to regulate the same. Striving
and working to obtain your daily income () is a means to
an end, not the ultimate goal in life. The following on the human
being’s want of possession shows that it is part of human nature never
to reach satisfaction when it comes to possessions. It should therefore
If the Son of Adam had two valleys full of possessions, he
stomach of the son of Adam, and Allah forgives whom He
Capitalism plays on this innate disposition by making people believe
pleasures, thereby eternalising the circle of demand and supply, with
unhappiness – which can then unsuccessfully be treated with the other
is perpetuated.
The spiritual aspect in human life is not reserved for those who have
their basic needs saturated. Islamic experience is, rather, reminiscent of
actualising the link towards one’s Creator prior to and whilst saturating
Islamic legal rule.4
of, for instance, the food one is about to eat, the way to buy a car, etc. In
addition, a Muslim is supposed to invoke the name of Allah (by reciting
the ) whenever starting any action. They thereby actualise
the (spiritual) link towards the Creator in any moment of their lives.
Additionally, any situation involving a lack of saturation of the named
supplication (, , etc.). These situations are spiritually
76
perseverance; passing them leads to happiness. The highly spiritualised
experience of fasting in the month of Ramadan, performed by Muslims
worldwide every year, actualises the self just because the very basic
need of food is not met from dawn to dusk.
Most fundamental Islamic concepts such as that of
(worshipping Allah), (the provisions provided for by Allah)
(S.W.T.), (relying on Allah), and the belief in and
(fate and predestination) are all expressive of the fact that spiritual
concepts permeate the entire life, actions and decision making process
of the individual and community. Self-actualisation is therefore most
prevalent at any level of human existence.
In summary, the Islamic idea of self-transcendence permeates the
entire human life in any of its aspects, by continuously establishing the
link towards the Creator. The capitalist system promotes the (empirically
false) idea that happiness lies in the sheer accumulation of wealth and
with these acquisitions, the human being will never be able to reach
happiness, thereby remaining in a perpetuated cycle of consumption,
societal, and international levels. The percentage of depression, mental
illnesses, violence and despair in the highly developed industrialised
parts of the world, and those parts of the world adopting the same system
is a clear indicator to the destructivity of this system, its underlying
ideas, and application.
Contrary to this, the Islamic approach sees happiness in obtaining
the Creator’s approval and reward in the Hereafter. Happiness can
therefore be reached under any material situation. Although Islamic
concepts recognise the basic human needs and consider meeting them
a necessity, the spiritual actualisation of the human being is prevalent
under any situation.
Conclusion
Maslow’s model of the hierarchy of needs, though being pervasive in
grounds, for not being empirically proven, for being universalised on the
basis of American values (its ethnocentricity), for internal contradictions
and other reasons. The proliferated pyramid-shaped model does not
even incorporate Maslow’s own later developments in thought.
77
in a way that is narrowed down from the original. The developments
its author has added to it are not given due consideration. It may be
symptomatic of our time and age and the state of the academia worldwide
original idea, the more successful it is.
Many criticisms tackle the role of spirituality in Maslow’s model.
Islamic receptions of the model primarily focus on this point. Some
contributions attempt at harmonising between a narrowed-down
model of , the higher objectives of the ,
and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. This article has shown that this
harmonisation does not give justice to either model.
It is the basic line of the Islamic approach to strike a balance between
material and spiritual needs in any situation of human existence, in
times of saturation and need, stability and change, health and illness,
like Abraham Maslow’s can therefore not give credit to the reality of the
interaction between material and spiritual aspects of the human being
It is therefore our opinion and conclusion that a model like Maslow’s
cannot simply be “Islamised” by adding or dropping, or attempting to
combine them with Islamically generated models such as the paradigm
of .
Endnotes
2. Compare the part on Islamic critique on Maslow’s model below.
3. See also Kerim Edipoglu (2006),
, Doctoral Dissertation, Tübingen, p. 54.
4. i.e. by evaluating an action as being obligatory, recommended, legally
78
References
Ali, A. H. (1995). The nature of human disposition: Al-Ghazali’s contribution
to an Islamic concept of personality. (1), 51–64.
maximization. , 117 (3), 467–475.
Islamic perspective Paper presented at the 3rd International Seminar
on Learning and Motivation (September 10–12, 2005), Langkawi,
Malaysia.
. Damascus:
Alserhan, B. A. (2012). . Gower: London.
Auda, J. (2007).
. IIIT: Herndon.
Auda, J. (2008). . IIIT: Herndon.
Baqutayan, S. (2012). The innovation of human nature in Islam.
(1), 162–173.
formal volunteering and self-reported health and happiness.
, 66(11), 2321–2334.
marketing theory: A brief case study of marketing what Muslim women
wear. (4), 287–295.
on customer linking, across cultures.
(2), 98–114.
New
De Mooij, M. (2009).
(2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Edipoglu, K. (2006). Islamisierung der Soziologie oder Soziologisierung des
Islam? Indigenisierungsansätze in Malaysia, Iran und der arabischen
Welt (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), University of Tübingen,
Germany.
79
apply in a collectivist culture.
, 8(2), 143–161.
powers: Responsible consumption and private standards.
,(2), 151–171.
Habib, R. (1993). Modernising vs Westernizing the social sciences: The case of
psychologyIn A. M. Elmessiri (Ed.),
(pp. 126–144). IIIT: London.
Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept.
(3), 389–398.
Hossli, P. (2007, January 29). As life situations change, so too do values.
. Retrieved from
as-life-situations-change-so-too-do-values
in Qatar.
,(8), 1070–1090.
Jerome, N. (2013). Application of the Maslow’s hierarchy of need theory;
impacts and implications on organisational culture, human resource
and employee’s performance.
, (3), 39–45.
Keynes, J. M. (1931). . London: Macmillan.
self-esteem: Comparison between the constructs of West and Islam.
, 1(13), 196–201.
Koltko-Rivera, M. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendance and opportunities for theory,
,(4), 302–317.
responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline
employees. , 78(3), 20–37.
(16th ed.). USA:
Prentice-Hall.
activities: Its antecedents and consequences. ,
66, 1716–1724.
, 2–11.
80
, (3), 543–557.
hierarchy of needs as a motivational theory, Monash University (
and Economics.
Maslow, A (1970). (2nd
and Row.
Maslow, A. (1971). .
Maslow, A. (1982). . USA: Lewis Publishers.
. New Delhi: Sage.
Nevis, E. C. (1983). Using an American perspective in understanding another
culture: Toward a hierarchy of needs for the People’s Republic of China.
, (3), 249–264.
nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-
being. , (2), 303–322.
Ragab, I. (1997). Creative engagement of modern social science scholarship: A
, (1), 35–49.
Ramprasad, K. (2013). Motivation and workforce performance in Indian
industries. , (4), 25–29.
(12th ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson.
form an Islamic perspective: A value-maximization approach.
, , 127–142.
Shauki, E. (2011). Perceptions on corporate social responsibility: A study
, 18(3), 200–208.
(2nd Ed.). USA: Thomson Southwestern.
Smith, L. T. (1999).
81
(pp. 127–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
does not support theory. , (5), 415–422.
Measuring satisfaction of the needs.
(2), 155–177.
of research on the need hierarchy theory.
, 15, 212–240.
Westwood, R. J. (1992).
. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
, 175–255.
the integration of needs as stipulated in and Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs on assistance
business programme. , , 41–52.
