ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Background: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology has exploded in recent years. Presently UAVs are beginning to be major in roads into geographical mapping, site inspection, agriculture, and search and rescue. Methods: This paper reviewed patents and papers worldwide related to both hardware and software for the construction and deployment of UAVs and is intended to provide a snapshot of currently available UAV technologies, as well as to identify recent trends and future opportunities in affiliated hardware and software. Results: Basic components related to self-designed units are explained (e.g. platform selection, autopilot control comparison and sensor selection), and current applications and research areas are discussed. Since autonomous navigation is a key technology in UAV applications, concepts about this are also explained. Conclusions: Both in the self-designed and commercial markets, UAV components are becoming modularized. By following a standard components list, it is no longer difficult to make a customised UAV. In this way, commercial products are becoming cheaper and more standardized in their performance. Current limitations of UAVs has also become more readily detectible. Extending the flight time, improving autonomous navigation abilities, and enriching the payload capacity will be the future research focus to address these limitations.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please
cite the published version when available.
Downloaded 2017-09-14T09:19:06Z
The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your
story matters! (@ucd_oa)
Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above.
Title State of Technology Review of Civilian UAVs
Author(s) Chen, Siyuan; Laefer, Debra F.; Mangina, Eleni
date 2016
information Recent Patents on Engineering, 10 (3): 160-174
Publisher Bentham Science Publishers
version (DOI)
State of Technology Review of Civilian UAVs
Siyuan Chen1, Debra F. Laefer1, and Eleni Mangina2
1University College Dublin – Urban Modelling Group School of Civil Engineering Dublin,
Ireland & Earth Institute, Ireland and 2University College Dublin - School of Computer Science
Dublin, Ireland
Abstract: Background: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology has exploded in recent
years. Presently UAVs are beginning to be major in roads into geographical mapping, site
inspection, agriculture, and search and rescue. Methods: This paper reviewed patents and papers
worldwide related to both hard-ware and software for the construction and deployment of UAVs
and is intended to provide a snapshot of currently available UAV technologies, as well as to
identify recent trends and future opportunities in affiliated hardware and software. Results:
Basic components related to self-designed units are explained (e.g. plat- form selection, autopilot
control comparison and sensor selection), and current applications and research areas are
discussed. Since autonomous navigation is a key technology in UAV applications, concepts
about this are also explained. Conclusions: Both in the self-designed and commercial markets,
UAV components are becoming modularized. By following a standard components list, it is no
longer difficult to make a customised UAV. In this way, commercial products are becoming
cheaper and more standardized in their performance. Current limitations of UAVs have also
become more readily detectible. Extending the flight time, im- proving autonomous navigation
abilities, and enriching the payload capacity will be the future research focus to address these
Key words: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Drone, Multi-rotor, Navigation, Remote Piloted
Airborne Systems.
A Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is defined by the U.S. Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) as an aircraft flown with no pilot on board [1]. Drones, Remote Piloted
Airborne Systems (RPAS) are also terms that are commonly used. UAVs were first introduced
for American military usage in 1950’s [2]. Such efforts continue in transport, surveillance, and
combat. However, in recent years, UAVs have gained great popularity in civilian usage.
Improvements in sensor and control technology have enabled UAVs to gain unprecedented
prominence in a wide range of non-military applications. This is especially true for multi-rotor
units because of their low cost and significant flexibility (due to their small size). Their
popularity is further promoted by remote control capabilities that can reduce the aircraft
operator’s exposure to dangerous environments for various forms of documentation and
investigation. Potential applications include search and rescue [3-5], civil engineering [6],
agriculture [7-9], wildlife conservation[10-12], and infrastructure inspection [13-17], as well as
transportation [18]. More use cases are shown in figure 1. According to a survey made by the
Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) on 3136 exemptions in the
United States, the top three applications in UAVs industry are construction, infrastructure and
agriculture (fig. 2) [19]. Notably, in many jurisdictions usage is restricted by aviation authority
regulations, as opposed to commercial viability.
Fig. 1. UAV Usage Categories
Fig. 2. UAV application distribution based on the first 3,136 exemptions granted in the United
States, as per January 20, 2016 [19]
UAVs can be classified in many ways such as usage (civilian vs. military), maximum
take-off weight (MTOW), and lift style (fixed-wing vs. multi-rotor). The relative capabilities
between fixed-wing and multi-rotor UAVs were recently summarized by Brien et al. [20].
According to that division, the fixed-wing UAVs are more stable and larger and have higher
flying capabilities, greater payload capacity, and better endurance but at the expense of a certain
level of agility and cost.
Table 1. Capabilities of fixed-wing/multi-rotors (adapted from [20])
Amongst civilian UAVs, typical components include the following: a frame, a driving
system, a power system, and a pilot system. To remotely control it and to obtain real-time video,
a controller, camera, camera gimbal, and monitor are also required. Figure 3 illustrates the basic
components for a camera-equipped UAV. Table 2 shows the electronic components used in a
typical system.
Fig. 3. Typical components of a Multi-rotor UAV (adapted from [21])
Table 2. Components
Drives the prop in small multi-rotors
Drives the prop and controlled by the
Electronic speed controller
Regulates the electrical power
supplied to the motors, which is
managed by the flight controller
Provides energy to the driving system,
pilot system, and payloads
Control &
Receives commands from the ground
station (receiver antenna) and sends
telemetry and other data (e.g. video)
from the on-board system (transmitter
Sends operator commands to the
UAV and receives real-time flight
Controls the power of each motor and
other systems depending on the data
received from the sensors, as well as
the commands from the ground
station; can be a commercial standard
device with open software or
something developed for a specific
Establishes the geographic position of
the RPAS
Determines the distance from the sea
Integrated accelerometers, gyroscopes,
and magnetometers. Determines the
current rate of acceleration, changes in
rotational attributes and orientation drift
Determines the relative speed
between the air and the RPAS
Points towards the ground to keep its
position over a specific area over the
ground; also records images.
Determines the distance from ground
and various obstacles
Ranges and detects static/moving
Gives a first person view of the flight
and can be used to take pictures or
record video
Produces photographs; usually
stabilized with a gimbal device
Produces thermal images
Laser Sensors
Generates a point cloud of the built
and natural geometry
Gas Sensors
Detects chemical substances and
concentration in the air (e.g. CO2)
Determines environmental
Measures radioactivity
Many other systems (physical and
electronic) and sensors can be easily
Frame materials are highly varied and may include wood, plastic, metal, glass, or carbon
fibres. Traditional and innovative manufacturing processes, such as injection moulding, laser
cutting, computerized numerical control (CNC) processing, 3D printing technology have all been
applied to UAV’s construction. For example, in 2013, engineers from the Advanced
Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC) at the University of Sheffield cooperated with the
Boeing company to design and manufacture a fixed wing UAV constructed entirely of
acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), a common plastic in 3D printing. Specifically, the
application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis and 3D printing technology were
able to improve aerodynamic performance [43]. Specifically, CFD was used to optimise the
chosen design and to assess the lift, drag, pitching moment, and other characteristics over a range
of angles of incidence. The application of 3D printing technology resulted in smooth leading and
trailing edges over each half-span, which was suited to the low Mach number flight regime under
which the UAV would operate.
In contrast to fixed-wing UAVs, multi-rotors UAV do not have high geometric
requirements for their frame design, except for the booms’ number and layout (fig. 4). The layout
could be of an X-shape, Y-shape, or V-shape along with the general quad-rotor, hexa-rotor, and
octo-rotor arrangements. The number of booms is usually 3, 4, 6, or 8. Additionally, each boom
may support one or two layers of props. More booms and more props tend to improve stability
and enhance payload capabilities but at the expense of battery efficiency and, thus, flight time.
More props also provide enhanced redundancy, in case of the loss of one or more rotors [44].
a. Quad-rotor
b. Hexa-rotor
c. Octo-rotor
d. Y-shape
E. V-shape
F. Double layer
Fig. 4. Multi-rotors Layout
Electronic motors are widely used as UAV driving systems. As shown in the Table 3
coreless motors and brushless motors are favoured, because they can provide a higher rolling
speed and bigger torque, as well as being more efficient and durable when compared to
traditional DC motors. However, to transform DC power into AC power and control the motor
speed, an electronic speed controller (ESC) must be connected with a brushless motor, which
will increase the weight and system complexity.
Fuel engines and hybrid engines are also sometimes used in UAVs. A German company
recently launched Yeair, the first UAV with a combustion engine. The UAV has a 60 minute
flight duration and can support a 5 kg payload [45]. The American company Top flight
developed the Airborg H6 1500, which has a 5000W rated (6000W peak) hybrid engine, with a
11.3 litre tank and a 16,000 mAh LiPo battery. With this, more than 2 hours of flight time can be
achieved with only 1 gallon (3.8 litre) of gasoline, even with a 9 kg payload [46].
The power system provides energy to the driving system, pilot system, and even payloads.
Fuel and LiPo batteries are the most commonly used energy sources in UAVs. However, a power
cable has also been utilized to provide a constant power supply. This was introduced by the
Israeli company Skysapience, as part of their HoverMaster series of UAVs to host payloads of up
to 18 kg including CCD/IR cameras, radars, lasers and hyperspectral sensors. A cable serving as
a power supply and wideband data link secures them (fig. 5). A similar method was also used in
CyPhy’s products under the following patents [47,48]. Only last year, the Canadian company
Energy Or Technologies developed a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell system and
with it achieved the world’s longest multi-rotor UAV flight of 3 hours and 43 minutes [49].
In addition, new charging technologies are coming onto the market. They address the short
battery life issue. One option is an outdoor wireless charging system developed by the German
company Skysense (fig. 6). Alternatively, using solar energy is an environmentally friendly way
to extend the flight time. Berry [26] patented a UAV with a wide fuselage equipped with a solar
turbine and external solar film to extend flight time. An alternative approach is a charging pile
combined with solar energy and wireless charging panels [50].
Fig. 5. Power cable used in
HoverMaster [51]
Fig. 6. Wireless charging system
To remotely control a UAV and obtain a First Person View (FPV) from the camera, a
ground station is required. A typical ground control station [53] includes a management unit, a
telemetry module, a user control module, a graphical user interface (GUI), and a wireless data
link subsystem. The wireless data link subsystem is used for remote communication with a UAV.
The telemetry module is coupled to the ground control station and is configured to download
on-board data from the UAV to the ground station and is configured to upload commands from
the ground station to the UAV. Control is often assisted through the use of a GUI, which
includes a display module that is configured to display an FPV from the UAV’s camera.
Communication frequency between the ground station and a UAV can occur at different
rates. Typical ones are 5.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz, 1.2 GHz or 900 MHz. While 900 MHz has great
obstacle penetration, a setting of 5.8 GHz has good range per watt and is well-suited for open
areas. Most Remote Control (R/C) circles used in UAVs operate at 2.4 GHz [54]. Wi-Fi, Zigbee
and 3G/4G all work around this frequency. Wi-Fi and Zigbee can be used for short distance
communication (usually less than 100 m), while 3G/4G can be used in long-distance
communication but with a short delay.
The autopilot system is the brain of a UAV. A typical autopilot system includes a flight
controller board, a gyroscope, an accelerometer, a barometer, a magnetometer, and a global
positioning system (GPS). In the last few years, autopilot systems have greatly benefitted from
open-source projects (OSPs) and online communities. The OSPs constantly optimize the
autopilot system by integrating different sensors and increasing reliability and stability. This was
particularly notable in 2014, when the Linux Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to
accelerating the growth of Linux and collaborative development, announced the founding of the
Dronecode Project, a common, shared open-source platform for UAVs [55]. Founding members
included 3D Robotics, Baidu, Yuneek, DroneDeploy, and Intel, amongst others. Dronecode
includes the APM/ArduPilot UAV software platform and associated code from 3D Robotics. It
also incorporated the partner PX4 project led by Lorenz Meier from ETH [56]. Based on the PX4
and APM projects, 3D Robotics published the Pixhawk autopilot platform at the end of 2014.
This portion of UAV control, especially as it matures into some form of autopilot system, is one
of the most rapidly changing aspects of the technology. A sampling of available OSPs and their
URLs are listed in Table 3 [57].
Table 3. Open-source Projects (adapted from [57])
Project Name
Has a set of autopilot products including hardware,
firmware, and software and is supported by the Linux
Foundation DroneCode effort
Focuses on developing two hardware platforms: the
CopterControl (both Original and CC3D) and the
Revolution and is an autopilot platform with a full INS
unit onboard
Was designed for multi-unit control with autonomous
flight as the primary focus and manual flying as
Supports PX4 and APM flight stacks and is supported by
the Computer Vision and Geometry Lab at ETH Zürich, as
well as the Linux Foundation DroneCode effort
Is general-purpose software to control a multi-rotor RC
model; first designed to control a tricopter
Is an open source, collaborative project that brings
together existing and future open source UAV projects
under a non-profit structure governed by the Linux
DIY Drones
Has created the world's first "universal autopilots",
ArduPilot Mega (APM) and partakes in the Pixhawk
Is a Linux-based open source project for UAVs and
robots that is combined with Robot Operating System
Robot Operating
System (ROS)
Is an open-source, meta-operating system, which provides
services from an operating system, hardware abstraction,
low-level device control, message passing between
processes, and package management
Initially, most companies aimed at penetration in the consumer market and focused on
making UAVs cheaper and more reliable. These efforts are reflected in refinement of the
structural design, improvement of flight control system, and enhancement of camera resolution.
In contrast, in the last two years, with the maturity of the civilian, professional UAV market,
there has been a shift towards greater functionality and the development of more user-friendly
devices. More specialized UAVs have been marketed for sports photography, filmmaking, sites
investigation and agriculture application. In the early years, there were three well-known
consumer UAV manufacturers – Parrot, SZ DJI Technology Co. (DJI), and 3D Robotics (3DR).
After that, further companies entered the market, such as Yuneec, SenseFly and Ehang.
According to UAVGLOBAL, there are currently 240 commercial UAV manufacturers around
the world [58].
In 2010, the French company Parrot released their first generation quadrotor, AR.Drone 1.0.
It had an ultrasonic altimeter (thereby providing vertical stabilization up to 6 meters), 15-watt
brushless motors, an 11.1 volt lithium polymer battery, and a forward-facing camera. With a
self-generated Wi-Fi hotspot, the UAV can be remotely controlled by an iOS device and is
equipped to send live video streams to mobile devices [59]. These features make it quite popular.
About half million of units have been sold to date [60]. Their new product Bebop is equipped
with a fish-eye lens camera that can take photos at 90 degree without loss in image quality.
In 2006, DJI was founded in China and started to design a flight control system for
helicopter like UAVs. In 2013, DJI produced their first, small-sized, ready-to-fly quadrotor, the
Phantom 1.0. With a built-in GPS sensor, it has a position-holding function making it useful for
inspection work. The unit also comes with a GoPro Hero action camera and an adjustable-angle
mount. The overall design provides significant stability in windy environments and improved
remote sensing data acquisition. This product helped DJI enter the market. According to a survey
from AUVSI, DJI now manufactures 65% of the platforms in the United States market [61] and
70% worldwide [62]. In the last two years, they have shifted their focus to the professional
market and invested in autonomous flight system development. Their latest product, the Phantom
4 combines advanced computer vision and sensing technology and was lunched in March of
2016. The Phantom 4’s obstacle sensing system features two forward-facing optical sensors that
scan for obstacles and automatically directs the aircraft around any impediments [63].
Furthermore, they also designed an octocopter named MG-1 for agriculture applications, a
quadrotor named Inspire for filmmaking [64] ,and a quadrotor platform named Matrice 100 for
research use [65]
3D Robotics was founded in 2009 in the United State. In 2014, they introduced their first
ready-to-fly, consumer products: IRIS and IRIS+. The products are distinguished by the
inclusion of the Follow Me technology [66], which enables a UAV to follow a moving target and
keep its camera automatically centred on it. In 2015, they lunched a more advanced model,
named Solo, equipped with two on-board computers marketed for both consumer and
professional aerial photography [67]. Later, as strong proponents of open source technology,
3DR announced that they would no longer produce any other legacy models except Solo and
released all of the 3D printable files for the IRIS+ exclusively to the MyMiniFactory community
[68]. With a 3D printed frame, users only need to purchase the electronic components from 3DR,
and they can build their own IRIS+ drone.
In 2015, Lily Robotic introduced their Lily quadrotor, which can be launched by being
thrown into the air. The waterproof body allows flying in the rain or snow, thereby making it
more suitable for sports photographing [69]. In the autonomous flying areana, Intel invested $60
million in the Chinese drone-maker Yuneec who recently released their Yuneec Typhon H UAV,
which is equipped with an Intel RealSense camera and an Intel CPU for obstacle detection and
collision avoidance [70]. For site investment applications, with the requirement of covering a
large survey area, SenseFly launched their fixed wing UAV-ebee that can cover 12 km² in a
single flight [71]. Moreover, the move towards multiple functionality is evidenced by the
German company Microdrones’ md4 series drones with its wide range of remote sensing
accessories including a laser scanner, thermal camera, and miniature, multiple camera arrays
Some typical UAV products are demonstrated in Table 2. The lower end of the market
starts a bit over the $200 mark, with a lot of choices between $800 and $1,500. This level of
UAV typically has 4 props with a built-in camera or an electronic gamble with a Gopro camera.
This class of products rarely has extra payload capability. The upper portion of the market starts
at $3000 and more commonly has 6 or 8 props with a carbon fibre, foldable frame and powerful
payload expansion mounts. The payload capability can range up to 5,000g. They are usually
equipped with a professional camera or multifunction cameras and a gamble. The flight time is
still a bottleneck for UAVs. Especially with payloads, it is hard for most consumer-based UAVs
to fly longer than 30 minutes. Flight time is largely independent of cost, but highly dependent
upon payload and self weight.
Table 4 Typical Commercial Drones
Flight Time/
Operation Range/
AR Drone
12 min/
Built-in 720p Cameras
Supports multiple
controlling devices
Bebop 2
22 min/
Stabilised 1080p Cameras
180° vision HD
3D Robotics
22 min/
GoPro Camera/
3D Robotics
25 min/
GoPro Camera/
Powered by twin computers
Ballistic parachute system
15 min/
GoPro Camera/
2-second battery swap
Phantom 4
28 min/
Built-in1080p Camera, 4K
resolution video/
Automatically avoid
Inspire 1
18 min/
Built-in1080p Camera, 4K
resolution video/
Independent camera
40 min/
External camera
stabilization gimbal/
QR X900
25 min/
External camera
stabilization gimbal/
Parechute protection
25 min/
Built-in1080p Camera/
Integrated autonomous
flight models
Flight Time/
Operation Range/
25 min/
Gimbal for Panasonic
Lumix GH4/
Integrated autonomous
flight models
45 min/
External camera
stabilization gimbal/
22 min/
Built-in HD camera and
thermal camera/
50 min/
Sony WX or thermoMAP/
Fig. 7. Research areas in the UAV domain (after [85]
According to a survey by Demir [85], UAV research can be classified into two aspects:
technology and operations. Technology research is related to the development of all UAV
systems, while those in operation address how UAV systems are used and are geared towards
their effective deployment. Fig. 7 shows an overview of the main research areas in the UAV
domain. Here, only the technology part is presented. In this aspect, autonomy is the most active
topic. Because UAVs have 6 degrees of freedom and are moving at a high speed, effective
manual remote control is challenging when working in geometrically complex environments. In
such scenarios, autonomous navigation technologies are a great support to operators. As
mentioned above, UAV companies (e.g. DJI, Inter, and Yuncee) invest significantly in this
function. Academic research groups are also interested in this field. For example, MIT’s group
employed a stereo camera with fixed-wing UAVs to avoid collisions at speeds of 30 Km/h [86],
while Carnegie Mellon University’s group presented an imitation learning strategy for
high-speed UAV autonomous flying through dense forest environments [87]. In that project, they
applied the DAgger (DAtaset aggregation) algorithm [88] to train the flight controller system. By
iteratively mimicking a human expert’s behavior, the controller performance improved. During a
flight test, the UAV avoided more than 680 trees when travelling 3.4km at speeds up to 1.5m/s.
Despite this notable success, to achieve full autonomous navigation, there are significant issues
to be resolved besides collision avoidance. These include path planning and automatic mapping
and scanning. While topics can be studied individually, they are typically addressed in composite
solutions. One major example is the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem.
This topic has merged sensor application, obstacle detection, pose estimation, and map
generation. These elements are discussed below.
SLAM is widely used in UAV navigation systems for the simultaneous tracking of an UAV and
the updating of the detection information in an unknown environment. SLAM has long been
studied for ground-based robots in two-dimensional (2D) situations and is now being introduced
into the more complex three-dimensional (3D) context required of UAVS. Hardware used in a
SLAM process could be classified into two groups: (1) environment detection sensors and (2)
positional estimation sensors. Environmental detection sensors give the on-board computer
obstacle information about the immediate environment, while positional sensors help to estimate
the UAV’s movement and register it in the same coordinate system (Fig. 8).
The critical factor for collision avoidance is obstacle perception. Because UAV payloads and
computing abilities are typically quite limited, detection devices to improve obstacle perception
must be lightweight (e.g. monocular camera[89], stereo cameras [86], RGB-D cameras [90],
Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensor [91], and ultrasonic distance sensors [92]). A
typical UAV object detection system is shown in Fig. 9 and includes two stereo camera pairs
(one pointing forwards, one pointing backwards) and a tilted, continuously rotating, 3D laser
scanner for perceiving the environment in all directions [93]. Depending upon the direction, the
measurement density of the 3D laser scanner varies and has its maximum in a forward-facing
cone. Only a small portion above the UAV’s back is shadowed. In addition, eight ultrasonic
sensors are mounted in a ring around the UAV. For localization and state estimation, a
downward pointing optical flow camera is mounted (in addition to the two stereo camera pairs
and the 3D laser scanner).
Fig. 8. SLAM Process Steps
Fig. 9. Typical UAV objects detect system setup [93]
Sensors included in the autopilot controller, such as a barometer, a magnetometer, GPS
devices, can help locate the absolute position of a UAV on a map system (see section 6.3).
Unlike ground robots that only move in 2D, UAVs move in 3D space and can have 6 degrees of
freedom. To address this, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), which integrates accelerometers,
gyroscopes, and magnetometers is used to track a UAVs movement in 6 degrees of freedom
(rotational attributes like pitch, roll, and yaw, as well as linear movement up/down, forward/back
and left/right shows in Fig. 8). Those data are used to calculate the relative position of the
vehicle within a mapping system.
Environment and self-position information are processed in the on-board computer or sent
back to a ground station computer. All location and geometric information are presented in a
single coordinate, map system. Obstacles, collision-free areas, and unknown spaces are presented
in this map. Depending upon the processing capabilities and the task requirements, different map
models could be applied (e.g. point cloud, polygonal model, and surface element model). To help
address the limited computing power of a UAV, an octree-based map [94] is widely used in
SLAM-based processing.
An octree-based map represents obstacles in an octree structure – a hierarchical data
structure for spatial subdivision in 3D (fig. 10). In such a data structure, each node in the octree
represents the space contained in a cubic volume, usually called a voxel. This volume is
recursively subdivided into eight sub-volumes until a given minimum voxel size is reached [95].
To accommodate limited UAV computing ability and on-board memory constraints, Droeschel
[96] introduced a multi-resolution octree map into a collision avoidance system. In that work (fig.
11) closer obstacles have higher resolutions and more distance obstacles have lower resolutions
(i.e. represented by bigger voxels).
Fig. 10. Octree Structure Identifying the Location of a Single Data Point
Fig. 11. Multi-resolution Octree Map [96]
As the position of UAVs is always changing, obstacles will be detected from different
angles and distances. To correlate and align scan results taken from different positions is a
challenge for the mapping process. For this, an alternative data index was adopted by Andreas in
the form of a k-d tree [97] as part of the 6D SLAM process [98]. As explained in detail by
Bentley, a k-d data index is a binary tree that has a node representation for every k-dimensional
point (Fig. 12). In this data index, each node can be considered as generating a borderless plane
that divides the space into two parts, known as half-spaces. In that data structure, if the sensor
finds an obstacle and wants to compare it with previous data, the on-board computer only needs
to search points in some specific branches, not the whole map. This process (commonly referred
to as a nearest neighbour search) can significantly accelerate the SLAM process [98].
Fig.12. K-d Tree in 3D space
In the current market, users can easily find UAVs with live video and autopilot functions
within a $500 budget. For the professional user, at around $5000 there is a lot of choice, such as
UAVs with 6 or 8 props, a 1-3 kg payload, multiple sensors, and attachment options for detailed
data acquisition. According to the data firm CBinsights, drone startups raised just over $450M in
equity financing across 74 deals in 2015. That’s up more than 300% over 2014 [99]. Those
investments will continue to make civilian UAVs even cheapereasier to use, and more
functional in the coming years. The overall UAV market may be further subdivided by
application areas, as UAV companies try to distinguish themselves with respect to extended
flight time, improved device control for autonomous navigation, and water/wind resistant
capabilities. Developers are also attempting to explore new fields for UAVs by enriching the
payload composition.
In recent years, the hardware technologies supporting UAVs have improved significantly.
Most patents have been in these areas, especially in hardware design and system direction
control, as the software side has been largely dominated by the open source community, where
notable advances have occurred in autopilot system research. Currently, flight time is the major
UAV limitation. In support of this, new power supply schemes are being studied. Further areas
where notable advances are likely are in swarm technology to allow the simultaneous operation
of multiple drones or new UAV designs to improve flight stability and energy efficiency.
Despite the huge and rapidly growing popularity of civilian UAVs, there is not presently a
single reference that shows the current state of the technology. This paper addresses this deficit
by comparing currently available commercial with respect to hardware, software and peripherals.
Considerations for cost, payload, and flying time are also addressed. The present market is spit
into professional and hobby level equipment with the cost break point being around $3,000.
While companies are presently striving for improved navigation and durability (including
water-proofing) there are also significant attempts being made to divide up the market by
developing (or at least marketing) specific UAVs for particular applications. Future UAVs are
likely to show significant advances in payload capacity, flight time, functionality, and enhanced
autonomous flight capabilities.
The authors have no commercial interest in any of the products discussed herein.
This project was made possible through the generous support the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant 642453
and funding through Geological Survey Ireland grant 2015-sc-042
[1] F. A. Authority, “Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Frequently Asked Questions.”
[Online]. Available:
[2] J. F. Keane and S. S. Carr, “A Brief History of Early Unmanned Aircraft,” John Hopkins
APL Tech. Dig., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 558–571, 2013.
[3] R. Marcus, “UAV- or Personal Flying Device-Delivered Deployable Descent Device,” US
2012/0226394 A1, 2012.
[4] D. Erdos, A. Erdos, and S. E. Watkins, “An experimental UAV system for search and
rescue challenge,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 32–37, 2013.
[5] Y.-H. Ho, Y.-R. Chen, and L.-J. Chen, “Krypto: Assisting Search and Rescue Operations
Using Wi-Fi Signal with UAV,” Proc. First Work. Micro Aer. Veh. Networks, Syst. Appl.
Civ. Use, pp. 3–8, 2015.
[6] P. Liu, A. Y. Chen, Y.-N. Huang, J.-Y. Han, J.-S. Lai, S.-C. Kang, T.-H. Wu, M.-C. Wen,
and M.-H. Tsai, “A review of rotorcraft Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) developments
and applications in civil engineering,” Smart Struct. Syst., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1065–1094,
[7] P. Haiyang, L. Bo, and S. Yiming, “Multi-rotor wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for
agriculture and forestry plant protection,” CN203512034 U, 2014.
[8] C. Zhang and J. M. Kovacs, “The application of small unmanned aerial systems for
precision agriculture: A review,” Precis. Agric., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 693–712, 2012.
[9] J. Qi, D. Song, H. Shang, and N. W. National, “Search and Rescue Rotary-Wing UAV and
Its Application to the Lushan Ms 7.0 Earthquake,” IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 7, no. PART 1,
pp. 81–86, 2007.
[10] G. P. Jones, L. G. Pearlstine, and H. F. Percival, “An assessment of small unmanned aerial
vehicles for wildlife research,” Wildl. Soc. Bull., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 750–758, 2010.
[11] L. Gonzalez, G. Montes, E. Puig, S. Johnson, K. Mengersen, and K. Gaston, “Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Wildlife Monitoring
and Conservation,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2016.
[12] J. C. Hodgson, S. M. Baylis, R. Mott, A. Herrod, and R. H. Clarke, Precision wildlife
monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles,” Sci. Rep., vol. 6, no. March, pp. 1–7, 2016.
[13] J. Stege, “Method to inspect components of a wind turbine,” EP 2 527 649 A1, 2011.
[14] G. Morgenthal and N. Hallermann, “Quality Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
( UAV ) Based Visual Inspection of Structures,” vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 289–303, 2014.
[15] I. Sa and P. Corke, “Vertical infrastructure inspection using a Quadcopter and shared
autonomy control,” Springer Tracts Adv. Robot., vol. 92, pp. 219–232, 2014.
[16] C. Deng, S. Wang, Z. Huang, Z. Tan, and J. Liu, “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Power
Line Inspection: A Cooperative Way in Platforms and Communications,” J. Commun., vol.
9, no. 9, pp. 687–692, 2014.
[17] N. Hallermann, G. Morgenthal, and V. Rodehorst, “Unmanned Aerial Systems ( UAS ) –
Case Studies of Vision Based Monitoring of Ageing Structures,” Int. Symp.
Non-Destructive, no. September, pp. 15 – 17, 2015.
[18] E. H. C. Harik, F. Guérin, F. Guinand, J.-F. Brethé, and H. Pelvillain, “UAV-UGV
Cooperation For Objects Transportation In An Industrial Area,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Ind.
Technol., pp. 547 – 552, 2015.
[19] “Commercial UAS Exemptions,” Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems
International (AUVSI). [Online]. Available:
[20] T. O. Brien, H. B. Abrahamsen, A. Zamarro, M. Valls, O. Badia, J. Guasch, D. Ioannidis,
K. Votis, C. Palaskas, S. Rogotis, and E. Mangina, “Remote Piloted Airborne Systems
(RPAS) and the Emergency Services,” 2015.
[21] “DJI - Matrice 100 Ready to Fly RTF Package.” [Online]. Available:
[22] “Coreless Motor.” [Online]. Available:
[23] “Brushless Motors.” [Online]. Available:
Image on Website/Motor Series.jpg.
[24] “ESC.” [Online]. Available:
[25] “LiPo Battery.” [Online]. Available:
[26] “Antennas.” [Online]. Available:
[27] “Ground Station.” [Online]. Available:
[28] “Flight Controller.” [Online]. Available:
[29] “GPS.” [Online]. Available:
[30] “Barometer.” [Online]. Available: Sensor.jpg.
[31] “Inertial measurement unit IMU .” [Online]. Available:
[32] “Airspeed senosr.” [Online]. Available:
[33] “Positioning Camera.” [Online]. Available:
[34] “Ultrasonic Sensors.” [Online]. Available:
[35] “Infrared Sensors.” [Online]. Available:
[36] “FPV Camera.” [Online]. Available:
[37] “HD Camera.” [Online]. Available:
[38] “Thermography Camera.” [Online]. Available:
[39] “Lidar Sensors.” [Online]. Available:
[40] “Gas Sensors.” [Online]. Available:
[41] “Temperature Sensors.” [Online]. Available:
[42] “Radioactivity Sensors.” [Online]. Available:
[43] G. Nicholson and C. Roberts, “Rapid Manufactured Fixed Wing Powered UAV.” [Online].
[44] T. Schneider, “Fault-tolerant Multirotor Systems,” 2011.
[45] “Yeair-the first quadrocopter carrying combustion engines.” [Online]. Available:
[46] “True Serial Hybrid Power Integration for UAVs.” [Online]. Available:
[47] S. A. Johnson and W. D. Burkard, “Aerial robot with dispensable conductive filament,”
US 7,631,834 B1, 2009.
[48] S. A. Johnson, “Aerial robot,” US 7,510,142 B2, 2009.
[49] “Energyor Demonstrates Multirotor Uav Flight Of 3 Hours, 43 Minutes.” [Online].
[50] J. Yuanzhi, “Charging pile of unmanned rotorcraft,” CN204481547U, 2015.
[51] “Sky Sapience - skysapience The only mobile , tethered , hovering platform in the world.”
[Online]. Available:
[52] “Skysense Drone Charging Stations Skysense.” [Online]. Available:
[53] M. Rath, N. D. Shekarappa, and V. Ramachandra, “GROUND CONTROL STATION
FOR UAV,” US 2007/0244608 A1, 2007.
[54] S. Lodefink, “FPV Fundamentals,” make, pp. 50–51, 2014.
[55] “Dronecode - About the Project.” [Online]. Available:
[56] “Members of The Linux Foundation.” [Online]. Available:
[57] H. Lim, J. Park, D. Lee, and H. J. Kim, “Build your own quadrotor: Open-source projects
on unmanned aerial vehicles,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 33–45, 2012.
[58] “Commercial UAV Manufacturers Commercial.” [Online]. Available:
[59] F. Callou and G. Foinet, “Method for the intuitive piloting of a drone by means of a
remote control,” US 8,594,862 B2, 2013.
[60] D. Cornish, “ESA launches drone app to crowdsource flight data,” WIRED.CO.UK, 2015.
[Online]. Available:
[61] S. Kesselman, “The First 1,000 Commercial UAS Exemptions,” 2015.
[62] D. Morgan, “China ’ s DJI drones flying high among U . S . companies,” Thomson
Reuters, 2015. [Online]. Available:
[63] “DJI Launches New Era of Intelligent Flying Cameras,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
[64] “Inspire 1 Pro - Professional aerial filmmaking platform | DJI.” [Online]. Available:
[65] “DJI - MAtrice 100.”
[66] K. Calvo, “What You Should Know About the Iris+ Quadcopter,” National geographic.
[Online]. Available:
[67] “3D Robotics New Solo Drone Promises Hollywood-Quality Photos.” [Online].
[68] S. J. Grunewald, “3DROBOTICS RELEASES 3D PRINTABLE IRIS +.” [Online].
[69] “Lily Flies Itself.” [Online]. Available:
[70] M. Moon, “Yuneec Typhoon H drone uses Intel tech to avoid collisions,” 2016. [Online].
[71] “senseFly - eBee.” [Online]. Available:
[72] “Drone equipment: multispectral camera, thermal imaging, GPS.” [Online]. Available:
[73] “Parrot - AR Drone 2.0.” [Online]. Available:
[74] “Parrot - Bebop 2 + Skycontroller Black Edition.” [Online]. Available:
[75] 3D Robotics-Iris+, “3D Robotics - Iris+.” [Online]. Available:
[76] “3D Robotics - Solo.” [Online]. Available:
[77] “Squadrone System - Hexo+.” [Online]. Available:
[78] “DJI - Phantom 4.”
[79] “DJI - Inspire 1 Pro.” [Online]. Available:
[80] “Walkera - QR X900.” [Online]. Available:
[81] “Yuneec - Typhoon H.” [Online]. Available:
[82] “Yuneec - Tornado H920.” [Online]. Available:
[83] “Microdrones - md4-1000.” [Online]. Available:
[84] “SenseFly - eXon.” [Online]. Available:
[85] K. A. Demir, H. Cicibas, and N. Arica, “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Domain: Areas of
Research,” vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 319–329, 2015.
[86] A. J. Barry and R. Tedrake, “Pushbroom Stereo for High-Speed Navigation in Cluttered
Environments,” 3rd Work. Robot. Clutter Percept. Interact., pp. 2–8, 2014.
[87] S. Ross, N. Melik-Barkhudarov, K. S. Shankar, A. Wendel, D. Dey, J. A. Bagnell, and M.
Hebert, “Learning monocular reactive UAV control in cluttered natural environments,”
Proc. - IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 1765–1772, 2013.
[88] S. Ross, G. J. Gordon, and D. Bagnell, “A Reduction of Imitation Learning and Structured
Prediction to No-Regret Online Learning,” in 14th International Conference on Artificial
Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 2011, vol. 15, pp. 627–635.
[89] J. Lee, K. Lee, S. Park, S. Im, and J. Park, “Obstacle avoidance for small UAVs using
monocular vision,” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 397–406, 2011.
[90] M. C. P. Santos, L. V. Santana, A. S. Brandao, and M. Sarcinelli-Filho, “UAV obstacle
avoidance using RGB-D system,” 2015 Int. Conf. Unmanned Aircr. Syst. ICUAS 2015, pp.
312–319, 2015.
[91] A. Ferrick, J. Fish, E. Venator, and G. S. Lee, “UAV obstacle avoidance using image
processing techniques,” 2012 IEEE Int. Conf. Technol. Pract. Robot Appl., pp. 73–78,
[92] U. Papa and G. Del Core, “Design of sonar sensor model for safe landing of an UAV,”
2nd IEEE Int. Work. Metrol. Aerospace, Metroaerosp. 2015 - Proc., pp. 346–350, 2015.
[93] D. Holz, M. Nieuwenhuisen, D. Droeschel, M. Schreiber, and S. Behnke, “Towards
Multimodal Omnidirectional Obstacle Detection for Autonomous Unmanned Aerial
Vehicles,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., vol. XL–1/W2, no.
September, pp. 4–6, 2013.
[94] A. Hornung, K. M. Wurm, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “OctoMap: An
efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees,” Auton. Robots, vol. 34,
no. 3, pp. 189–206, 2013.
[95] D. Meagher, “Geometric modeling using octree encoding,” Comput. Graph. Image
Process., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 129–147, 1982.
[96] D. Droeschel, M. Nieuwenhuisen, M. Beul, D. Holz, J. Stuckler, and S. Behnke,
“Multilayered Mapping and Navigation for Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles,” J. F.
Robot. 00(00), 1–25, vol. 7, no. DOI: 10.1002/rob.21603, pp. 1–25, 2015.
[97] J. L. Bentley, “Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching,”
Commun. ACM, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 509–517, 1975.
[98] A. Nuchter, K. Lingemann, and J. Hertzberg, “6D SLAM with Cached kd-tree Search,” J.
F. Robot., pp. 699–722, 2007.
[99] “Drone Startup Funding Approaches $500M In 2015.” [Online]. Available:
... Unnamed aerial vehicles (UAVs), which are also known as drones, are very important assets for military communication services for last twenty years approximately. With the advancement to technology, its deployment is very easy and can support the communication systems to more broad perspective like for general use of public [1,2]. However, its applications are restricted by countries regulations because of public safety issues. ...
... The analysis based on these channel models indicate the optimal UAV position [19,20]. (2) To develop models based on tapped delay line (TDL) concept to characterize the multipath and direct path components [21][22][23]. (3) To develop geometricbased stochastic models for evaluating spatial-temporal variations in a geometric simulation environment. ...
Unnamed aerial vehicles (UAVs) are of great importance on various platforms because of its rapid and easy deployment. In order to get an insight of UAV aided communication systems, an accurate channel model of UAV channels is needed. We propose a general channel model for UAV link based on alpha-beta model, which is extensively used in the literature. Specifically, we derive the normalized expression of probability density function (PDF), cumulative distribution function (CDF), and moments of the proposed model. Shadowing component is assumed to follow log-normal distribution and multipath component is characterized with the help of Nakagami-m distribution. The outage probability of a UAV based communication system is also obtained by using CDF expression.
... Multi-rotor drones originally appeared as a quite smart solution for entertainment, but have become an important tool in many applications [1], including package delivery [2], [3], to mention just one of them. Furthermore, multirobot systems are being used nowadays as a solution to improve performance in several tasks [4]. ...
... Rearranging (7), it is possible to find the angle ψ l d to be fed to (1). The result of such a rearrangement is ...
... The status and trends of innovation can be assessed through patent analysis, as was done for India by Abraham and Moitra (2001), or e.g. technological development of a selected technology such as UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) can be reviewed through patent analysis of its hardware and software as done by Chen et al. (2016). ...
Full-text available
Science, Technology, and Innovation play a crucial role in the Sendai Framework for Disaster
... Making the best decisions and taking the best measures involve accessing a large amount of information, analyzing, and synthesizing it [2]. To overcome these limitations, information processing and information technology are used in the decision-making process, and in particular information technology for decision support (SSD) [3]. A special category of existing decision support systems is the geographic information systems (GIS): systems that allow the definition and use of thematic maps that facilitate a multicriteria analysis, which is a very important aspect in the management of tourist and agritourism reception structures [4][5][6]. ...
Full-text available
The use of scanning technologies and digital photogrammetry with the help of drones in the field of agritourism activities in Romania is a topic of novelty, because all the data necessary for the implementation or development of such research can be collected very quickly and with maximum efficiency. The classic methods are cumbersome and with a high consumption of inputs, and human and financial resources. The case study presents a practical method of applying this technology in the case of the agritourist farm REMMAR, from Vâlcea county, Romania, which wants to expand its agricultural production capacity with ecological products. Graphic support was obtained by scanning or digitizing existing maps in the physical/printed format and by acquiring data of interest in the digital format by photogrammetric methods and aerial field scanning of the studied area. The original elements of the topic are: how to obtain images by using photogrammetric methods; developing the methodology of the research and the actual development, from setting the basic objectives to obtaining and presenting the final results; elaboration of the methodology of the needs analysis and designing the specific data model; designing and the practical implementation of the geographic information system in terms of structure, methods, and means of software implementation. The successful implementation of the system was achieved only under the conditions of the existence of a data model specific to the field of action, and first realizing the conceptual foundation of the applicable data model, which would allow the registration, storage, extraction, processing, and effective analysis of the data of interest. From a theoretical and practical point of view, the research has a unique character in Romania, because it presents for the first time the development of a standard methodology for the design, expansion, and promotion of agritourism farms. The built geographic information system (GIS) is an effective tool for the management and control of the quality and efficiency of works specific to sustainable agricultural production.
... It also studies the potential for EVs and their impacts on society. Recent studies focused on optimizing the energy efficiency in terrestrial and aerial EVs because their adoption is rising [18][19][20]. The capacity of the battery pack or electrical energy principally depends on state-of-charge, driving style, temperature, charge, and discharge current profiles [21,22]. ...
Full-text available
Transportation electrification is a pivotal factor in accelerating the transition to sustainable energy. Electric vehicles (EVs) can operate either as loads or distributed power resources in vehicle-to-grid (V2G) or vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) linkage. This paper reviews the status quo and the implications of transportation electrification in regard to environmental benefits, consumer side impacts, battery technologies, sustainability of batteries, technology trends, utility side impacts, self-driving technologies, and socio-economic benefits. These are crucial subject matters that have not received appropriate research focus in the relevant literature and this review paper aims to explore them. Our findings suggest that transitioning toward cleaner sources of electricity generation should be considered along with transportation electrification. In addition, the lower cost of EV ownership is correlated with higher EV adoption and increased social justice. It is also found that EVs suffer from a higher mile-per-hour charging rate than conventional vehicles, which is an open technological challenge. Literature indicates that electric vehicle penetration will not affect the power grid in short term but charging management is required for higher vehicle penetration in the long-term scenario. The bi-directional power flow in a V2G linkage enhances the efficiency, security, reliability, scalability, and sustainability of the electricity grid. Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) charging/discharging has also been found to be effective to offload the distribution system in presence of high EV loads.
... • The maximum overrun of the system can be controlled using controllers [28,29]. ...
Drones, also known as Crewless Aircrafts (CAs), are by far the most multi - level and multi developing technologies of the modern period. This technology has recently found various uses in the transportation area, spanning from traffic monitoring applicability to traffic engineering for overall traffic flow and efficiency improvements. Because of its non-linear characteristics and under-actuated design, the CA seems to be an excellent platform to control systems study. Following a brief overview of the system, the various evolutionary and robust control algorithms were examined, along with their benefits and drawbacks. In this chapter, a mathematical and theoretical model of a CA’s dynamics is derived, using Euler’s and Newton’s laws. The result is a linearized version of the model, from which a linear controller, the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), is generated. Furthermore, the performance of these nonlinear control techniques is compared to that of the LQR. Feedback-linearization controller when implemented in the simulation for the chapter, the results for the same was better than any other algorithm when compared with. The suggested regulatory paradigm of the CA-based monitoring system and analysis study will be the subject of future research, with a particular emphasis on practical applications.
This chapter discusses the kinematic models of some wheeled mobile platforms and the aerial four motors helicopter-type vehicles. Such models show that commanding suitable velocities to the robots analyzed, the wheeled omnidirectional, unicycle and car-like robots and the aerial multirotor robot as well, causes velocities in the world frame, meaning that the commanded vehicles can move to any point in the navigation plane or in the navigation 3D space, in the cases of wheeled robots or aerial robots. Therefore, such models can be used to design automatic kinematic controllers, able to guide such robots in their navigation. As such controllers deal with the velocities of the robots ignoring the inertial effects, they are called kinematic controllers, and are responsible to move the vehicles in their working space. The design of such kinematic controllers, however, is not addressed here, but in Chap. 4.
Unnamed aerial vehicles (UAVs) are of great importance on various platforms because of its rapid and easy deployment. In order to get an insight of UAV aided communication systems, an accurate channel model of UAV channels is needed. We propose a general channel model for UAV link based on alpha-beta model, which is extensively used in the literature. Specifically, we derive the normalized expression of probability density function (PDF), cumulative distribution function (CDF), and moments of the proposed model. Shadowing component is assumed to follow log-normal distribution and multipath component is characterized with the help of Nakagami-m distribution. The outage probability of a UAV based communication system is also obtained by using CDF expression.
The measurement and characterization of luminaires and lighting scenes is an important part of their design and evaluation process. These measurements often rely on special equipment and generally require manual labor. Our study investigates the possibility of automated lighting measurement using drones, a solution that is gaining popularity in various industrial applications. More precisely, we investigate the possibility of automating illuminance mapping and directional luminous intensity measurement. For this purpose, we present simple models to evaluate the effect of positioning errors on the measurements' performance. Based on these models, we outline the limitations of similar systems, why the lower hollow cone (~10–45°) is ideal for the measurement, and that major uncertainties arise at the height of the luminaire and directly underneath (or above) it. We compare the results to a proof‐of‐concept prototype device built using commercially available components, experimentally demonstrating our findings. Finally, based on the experiments, we provide guidelines and recommendations for the development of a device capable of in‐situ photometric measurement of luminaires.
Full-text available
The user inclines the apparatus (16) according to the pitch (32) and roll (34) axes to produce inclination signals (θI, φI) which are transformed into corresponding command setpoints (θd, φd) for the drone (10) in terms of attitude of the drone according to the pitch (22) and roll (24) axes of the drone. The drone and the apparatus each determine the orientation of their local reference frame (XlYlZl; XbYbZb) in relation to an absolute reference frame linked to the ground (XNEDYNEDZNED), to determine the relative angular orientation of the drone in relation to the apparatus. Then, the reference frame of the apparatus is realigned on the reference frame of the drone by a rotation that is a function of this relative angular orientation. The realigned values thus correspond to user commands referenced in the reference frame of the apparatus and no longer in that of the drone, which allows for more intuitive piloting when the user is watching the drone.
Full-text available
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) represent a new frontier in environmental research. Their use has the potential to revolutionise the field if they prove capable of improving data quality or the ease with which data are collected beyond traditional methods. We apply UAV technology to wildlife monitoring in tropical and polar environments and demonstrate that UAV-derived counts of colony nesting birds are an order of magnitude more precise than traditional ground counts. The increased count precision afforded by UAVs, along with their ability to survey hard-to-reach populations and places, will likely drive many wildlife monitoring projects that rely on population counts to transition from traditional methods to UAV technology. Careful consideration will be required to ensure the coherence of historic data sets with new UAV-derived data and we propose a method for determining the number of duplicated (concurrent UAV and ground counts) sampling points needed to achieve data compatibility.
Full-text available
Surveying threatened and invasive species to obtain accurate population estimates is an important but challenging task that requires a considerable investment in time and resources. Estimates using existing ground-based monitoring techniques, such as camera traps and surveys performed on foot, are known to be resource intensive, potentially inaccurate and imprecise, and difficult to validate. Recent developments in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), artificial intelligence and miniaturized thermal imaging systems represent a new opportunity for wildlife experts to inexpensively survey relatively large areas. The system presented in this paper includes thermal image acquisition as well as a video processing pipeline to perform object detection, classification and tracking of wildlife in forest or open areas. The system is tested on thermal video data from ground based and test flight footage, and is found to be able to detect all the target wildlife located in the surveyed area. The system is flexible in that the user can readily define the types of objects to classify and the object characteristics that should be considered during classification.
Full-text available
p>Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) domain has seen rapid developments in recent years. As the number of UAVs increases and as the missions involving UAVs vary, new research issues surface. An overview of the existing research areas in the UAV domain has been presented including the nature of the work categorised under different groups. These research areas are divided into two main streams: Technological and operational research areas. The research areas in technology are divided into onboard and ground technologies. The research areas in operations are divided into organization level, brigade level, user level, standards and certifications, regulations and legal, moral, and ethical issues. This overview is intended to serve as a starting point for fellow researchers new to the domain, to help researchers in positioning their research, identifying related research areas, and focusing on the right issues. Defence Science Journal, Vol. 65, No. 4, July 2015, pp. 319-329, DOI: </p
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In this paper a procedure that creates a three dimensional (3D) virtual map useful for Safe Landing of an UAV Quadcopter [3], through a Ultrasonic Sensor Model is presented. Reflective sound waves produced from sonar sensor were analyzed and managed to generate a constructed plane where the UAV landing is possible and safe. The low-cost sensor gives relatively accurate range readings if there are disregarding angular uncertainty and specular reflections. Application works for an horizontal plane with and without obstacles inside it. Ultrasonic sensor detects obstacles in the landing field and if there are obstacles higher than UAV landing legs, the landing procedure is aborted. A series of ultrasonic sensors installed on UAV are used for low-altitude mapping on an horizontal plane. Experiments were ducted on a model at 150 cm from the landing field.
A brief history of early unmanned aircraft, focusing on WWI through the First Persian Gulf War, is discussed. With the start of the Cold War, UAVs began to be used as ISR systems, with limited success as weapons delivery platforms. Development continued throughout the Vietnam War. Currently, UAVs effectively provide users with real-time ISR information. Additionally, if the ISR information can be quickly understood and locations geo-registered, UCAVs can be used to strike time-sensitive targets with air-to-surface weapons. On 15 September 1924, for the first time in history, a radio-controlled Curtiss F-5L was flown remotely through all phases of flight. Because of the extent of enemy anti-aircraft fire in Vietnam, UAVs were often used as unmanned intelligence gathering platforms, taking photos from low and high altitude that were used for strike planning and battle damage assessment. Nowadays, unmanned aircraft such as the Predator are armed with laser designators and Hellfire missiles so they can perform attack orchestration and target termination.
The emerging technology of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) has become more affordable and practicable for power line inspections. In this paper, we propose a multi-platform UAV system and multi-model communication system for highly efficient power line inspection tasks in China. The different UAVs cooperatively serve as long-distance imaging, short dis-tance imaging and communication relay. The high quality im-age/video is transmitted in realtime to the on-site control station for UAV navigation and far end office for analysis. Our experi-ence shows that the cooperative inspection for multi-UAVs can achieve a much higher efficiency than traditional inspection methods.
This work proposes an obstacle avoidance strategy for UAV navigation in indoor environments. The proposal is able to compute the distance among the UAV and the obstacles (which change their position dynamically), and then to select the closest one. When a collision risk is pointed out, the algorithm establish some escape points, whose orientation is aligned tangentially to the obstacle edge or to the UAV normal displacement. Considering that only the desired point is change during the avoidance maneuver, the stability of the whole nonlinear system is demonstrated in the sense of Lyapunov. Information Filter is used to track the 3D positioning of the UAV and the obstacles. Moreover, UAV state variables are given by a Decentralized Information Filter, which fuses information from the Inertial Measurement Unit onboard the aircraft and the depth-camera sensor (RGB-D). The effectiveness of the proposal is demonstrated by simulation results, which take into account the AR.drone rotorcraft dynamic model.
Rapid search and rescue responses after earthquakes or in postseismic evaluation tend to be extremely difficult. To solve this problem, we summarized the requirements of search and rescue rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (SR-RUAV) systems according to related works, manual earthquake search and rescue, and our knowledge to guide our research works. Based on these requirements, a series of research and technical works have been conducted to present an efficient SR-RUAV system. To help rescue teams locate interested areas quickly, a collapsed-building detecting approach that integrates low-altitude statistical image processing methods was proposed, which can increase survival rates by detecting collapsed buildings in a timely manner. The entire SR-RUAV system was illustrated by simulated earthquake response experiments in the China National Training Base for Search and Rescue (CNTBSR) from 2008 to 2010. On April 20, 2013, Lushan (China) experienced a disastrous earthquake (magnitude 7.0). Because of the distribution of buildings in the rural areas, it was impossible to implement a rapid search and postseismic evaluation via ground searching. We provided our SR-RUAV to the Chinese International Search and Rescue Team (CISAR) and accurately detected collapsed buildings for ground rescue guidance at low altitudes. This system was significantly improved with respect to its searching/planning strategy and vision-based evaluation in different environments based on the lessons learned from actual missions after the earthquake. The SR-RUAV has proved to be applicable and time saving. The physical structure, searching and planning strategy, image-processing algorithm, and improvements in real missions are described in detail in this study.