Content uploaded by Claus Vögele
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Claus Vögele on Nov 14, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
1 3
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2016) 25:1267–1269
DOI 10.1007/s00787-016-0893-7
BRIEF REPORT
Resilience and rejection sensitivity mediate long‑term outcomes
of parental divorce
Violetta K. Schaan1 · Claus Vögele1
Received: 6 March 2016 / Accepted: 19 July 2016 / Published online: 26 July 2016
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
the results call for parental awareness and counseling to tar-
get and reduce the observed increased level of childhood
trauma. Limitations concern the cross-sectional and retro-
spective design of the study.
Keywords Parental divorce · Mental health · Resilience ·
Rejection sensitivity · Childhood trauma
Introduction
Over the last decades, the number of divorces has
increased considerably. The experience of parental divorce
is a major life event that can easily result in emotional
(sometimes traumatic) stress to the child concerned and,
therefore, mental and physical ill-health (e.g., [1]). Paren-
tal divorce can enhance the risk for children to develop
insecure attachment styles [2], which are related to physi-
cal and psychological health problems [3]. Insecure attach-
ment styles have been shown to be related to rejection
sensitivity, a disposition that reflects the tendency “to
anxiously expect, readily perceive and intensely react to
rejection” [4]. Rejection sensitivity is a key mediator for
many mental disorders such as depression [5] and border-
line personality disorder, and is used as a proxy for inse-
cure attachment in this study [6]. Protective mental health
factors, e.g., personal resilience, not only help children to
cope successfully with stressful events such as parental
divorce but can also be negatively shaped by these events
[7]. The aims of this study were (1) to retrospectively
investigate differences in levels of resilience and rejec-
tion sensitivity between the offspring of divorced and non-
divorced parents and (2) to examine whether such differ-
ences are associated with psychological problems in later
life (mediation hypothesis).
Abstract Increasing divorce rates leave more and more
children to deal with the separation of their parents. Recent
research suggests that children of divorced parents more
often experience psychological and physical symptoms
than children of non-divorced parents. The processes that
mediate the relationship between parental divorce and ill-
health, however, are still elusive. This study investigated the
mediating role of psychological factors such as resilience
and rejection sensitivity on the long-term consequences
of parental divorce in young adults. One hundred and
ninety-nine participants (mean age 22.3 years) completed
an online survey, including measures of mental health,
childhood trauma, resilience, and rejection sensitivity. Par-
ticipants with divorced parents (33 %) reported increased
levels of psychological symptoms, childhood trauma, rejec-
tion sensitivity, and lower levels of resilience. The associa-
tion between parental divorce and mental health was fully
mediated by resilience, rejection sensitivity, and childhood
trauma. The mediation model explained up to 44 % of the
total variance in mental health symptoms. Resilience and
rejection sensitivity are crucial factors for successful cop-
ing with the experience of parental separation. Prevention
programs that help to boost children’s resilience might
help to reduce the long-term effects of parental divorce on
their attachment style (e.g., rejection sensitivity), thereby
improving their mental health on the long run. Furthermore,
* Violetta K. Schaan
violetta.schaan@uni.lu
Claus Vögele
claus.voegele@uni.lu
1 Research Unit INSIDE, Institute for Health and Behavior,
University of Luxembourg, Campus Belval-Maison
des Sciences Humaines 11, Porte des Sciences,
L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
1268 Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2016) 25:1267–1269
1 3
Methods
Questionnaires
Rejection sensitivity was measured using the short version
of the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire as validated by
Schulze et al. [8] (α = 0.77). Resilience was assessed with the
13-item inventory as validated by Leppert et al. [9] (α = 0.90).
As parental divorce can possibly be associated with subse-
quent traumatic experiences, we assessed early life adversities
using the German-version of the Childhood Trauma Question-
naire (α = 0.90). Mental health problems in terms of depres-
sion and anxiety-related symptoms were measured using the
Hopkins Symptoms Checklist 25 (HSCL-25; α = 0.93).
Sample and general procedure
An online questionnaire was created on sociesurvey.de and
distributed via Facebook and the university’s student plat-
form. Volunteers gave online informed consent before start-
ing the survey. Ethics approval was obtained for the study
design from the appropriate University Ethics Panel.
Thirteen out of 199 participants were excluded from
further analysis because of (a) their wish to have their data
deleted (N = 1), (b) parents deceased (N = 6), (c) extreme
values on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (>2.5 SDs
above the mean; N = 5) or (d) divorce of parents during
adulthood (participant >18 years at the time of divorce;
N = 1).
The majority of participants were living in Germany
(58.9 %) or Luxembourg (34.5 %). Participants’ mean age was
22.30 years (SD = 3.75) with 85.4 % of participants being
female. Sixty-two participants (33 %) experienced the divorce
of their parents at an average age of 7.75 years (SD = 5.25).
Results
Rejection sensitivity
To test the hypothesis that participants with divorced parents
show higher rejection sensitivity than participants with non-
divorced parents, a Welch test was calculated. Participants
with divorced parents had significantly higher rejection sen-
sitivity levels (M = 11.35, SD = 4.73) than participants who
did not experience the divorce of their parents [M = 9.86,
SD = 3.82; t(102.224) = 4.613, p = 0.03, d = 0.35].
Resilience
Participants with divorced parents had significant lower
resilience (M = 5.08, SD = 0.94) compared with those par-
ticipants who did not experience the divorce of their parents
[M = 5.41, SD = 0.94; t(124.117) = 5.23, p = 0.024,
d = 0.35].
Childhood trauma
Participants who experienced parental divorce scored sig-
nificantly higher on the CTQ (M = 8.03, SD = 2.00) than
participants whose parents still lived together [M = 6.59,
SD = 2.00; t(126.788) = 20.62, p < 0.001; d = 0.72].
Mental health
Groups differed significantly on the global HSCL score
[participants with divorced parents: M = 1.91, SD = 0.52;
participants with non-divorced parents: M = 1.73,
SD = 0.53; t(1123.749) = 4.609, p = 0.034, d = 0.34].
To test the main hypothesis that differences in resilience
and rejection sensitivity account for differences in mental
health problems between participants with divorced and par-
ticipants with parents living together a bootstrapping proce-
dure was used (see Fig. 1). Resilience, rejection sensitivity,
and childhood trauma were entered as mediators between
condition (i.e., divorced parents vs. non-divorced parents)
and mental health (global HSCL) with n = 10000 resamples
[10]. The results showed that rejection sensitivity, resilience,
and childhood trauma mediated the effect of parental divorce
on mental health, when using bias-corrected and accelerated
95 % bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) for the indirect
effect of condition on mental health (see Table 1).
Fig. 1 Illustration of the bootstrapping analysis. Paths are represented
using the following standardized coefficients: a1, a2, and a3 indicate
the coefficients from condition (divorce vs. no divorce of the parents)
to each mediator (i.e., rejection sensitivity, resilience and childhood
trauma), respectively; b1, b2, and b3 are the respective coefficients
from the mediators (i.e., rejection sensitivity, resilience and childhood
trauma) to mental health symptoms; c is the coefficient that indicates
the total effects of condition on mental health symptoms without con-
trolling for the mediators and c’ reflects the condition-to-mental health
symptoms path controlling for the mediators (direct effect). * p < 0.05,
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
1269Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2016) 25:1267–1269
1 3
Discussion
The present results confirm previous findings of reduced
psychological well-being in young adults who experienced
the divorce of their parents during childhood, compared
with those without this experience. We observed higher
scores on the childhood trauma scale, increased rejec-
tion sensitivity and reduced resilience in the offspring of
divorced parents compared with those of non-divorced
parents. The results suggest a mediating role of resilience,
rejection sensitivity, and childhood trauma for the asso-
ciation between the experience of parental divorce and
increased levels of anxiety and depression. The media-
tion model explained up to 44 % of the total variance in
mental health symptoms. Prevention programs focusing
on increasing resilience might enable children to cope bet-
ter with the experience of their parents’ divorce, thereby
preventing the development of long-term mental health
problems. Not only resilience, however, but also rejection
sensitivity may be an important target for prevention and
intervention. By helping children to understand and cope
with the separation of their parents, children might be given
the tools to stay healthy without developing relationship
anxiety. The high levels of childhood trauma highlight the
need for more in-depth and longitudinal research. Parents
might be overwhelmed with the situation themselves and
may, therefore, not be able to support their child. Provid-
ing help to parents and children at an early stage during
the divorce process might help to stall the development of
symptoms, and to prevent unfavorable long-term changes
in attachment styles and resilience. Future research should
focus on specific types of resilience that might be beneficial
for children when facing parental divorce. In addition, lon-
gitudinal studies could help to rule out reversed causality,
i.e., higher divorce prevalence in families with lower levels
of mental health and resilience.
Limitations of this study concern its cross-sectional
design and the preponderance of students and female
participants, which restricts the generalization of the results
to the general population. The retrospective design pre-
cludes any conclusions on causality. In addition, selection
bias might have affected the results.
Conflict of interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author
states that there is no conflict of interest.
References
1. Amato PR, Keith B (1991) Parental divorce and the well-being
of children: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 110:26–46
2. Crowell JA, Treboux D, Brockmeyer S (2009) Parental divorce
and adult children’s attachment representations and marital sta-
tus. Attach Hum Dev 11:87–101
3. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2012) An attachment perspective on
psychopathology. World Psychiatry 11:11–15
4. Downey G, Feldman SI (1996) Implications of rejection sensitiv-
ity for intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:1327–1343
5. Ayduk O, Downey G, Kim M (2001) An expectancy-value model
of personality diathesis for depression: rejection sensitivity and
depression in women. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27:868–877
6. Staebler K, Helbing E, Rosenbach C, Renneberg B (2011) Rejec-
tion sensitivity and borderline personality disorder. Clin Psychol
Psychot 18:275–283
7. Singh-Taylor A, Korosi A, Molet J, Gunn BG, Baram TZ (2015)
Synaptic rewiring of stress-sensitive neurons by early-life expe-
rience: a mechanism for resilience? Neurobiol stress 1:109–115
8. Schulze J, Gutz L, Renneberg B (2012) Ein effizienterer weg um
zurückweisungsempfindlichkeit zu erfassen—entwicklung einer
kurzversion des rejection sensitivity questionnaires (RSQ). In
Vögele C (ed) Abstractband des 30. Symposium klinische psy-
chologie und psychotherapie der DGPs fachgruppe klinische
psychologie und psychotherapie [book of abstracts of the 30th
symposium for clinical psychology and psychotherapy of the
DGPs chapter clinical psychology and psychotherapy], Univer-
sity of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
9. Leppert K, Koch B, Brähler E, Strauss B (2008) Die Resilien-
zskala (RS)—Uberprüfung der langform RS-25 und einer kurz-
form RS-13. Klin Diagn Eval 2:226–243
10. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for
estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav
Res Meth Ins Comput 36:717–731
Table 1 Results of the
mediation analysis
LLCI lower limit 95 % confidence interval, UCLI upper limit 95 % confidence interval, RS rejection sensi-
tivity
Predictors Outcome variable Model coefficients Indirect effects
βs.e. t p Effect (SE) LLCI–UCLI
Divorce Health 0.331 0.155 2.14 0.03
Divorce CTQ 0.665 0.148 4.48 <0.001
Divorce RS 0.355 0.154 2.303 0.02
Divorce Resilience −0.350 0.154 −2.27 0.02
Divorce Health −0.042 0.125 −0.338 0.736
CTQ 0.232 0.063 0.367 <0.001 0.154 (0.055) 0.06–0.27
RS 0.213 0.064 3.320 0.001 0.076 (0.041) 0.01–17
Resilience −0.409 0.066 −6.222 <0.001 0.143 (0.068) 0.02–0.29