Conference PaperPDF Available

Assessing the environmental impact of new Circular business models

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Circular business models are increasingly viewed as a key driver for business competitiveness and sustainability. Yet it is unclear what the positive (or negative) environmental impact of such new business models might be. Existing methods such as Life Cycle Assessment and Mass Flow Analysis, typically more suited for product-level and material-level environmental assessment respectively, may be modified to assess the impact of new circular business models. However, these might be too time and resource-intensive to effectively guide decision-making. Building on earlier work on circular design and business models, the performance economy and life cycle and systems thinking, this work proposes a list of guiding principles to start assessing the impact of new circular business models. The guiding principles are organised according to the following high-level strategies: Slowing effects; Closing effects; Life cycle effects, and Systems effects. Slowing effects are linked to long lasting products and extending product life as part of the new business model. Closing effects relate to the potential for recycling, or product life post-consumer use, as a result of the circular business model innovation. Life cycle effects are the effects not yet captured within these slowing and closing effects, which arise across the product life cycle from raw material sourcing up until production, transport, use and disposal of products. Finally, Systems effects are the wider impacts of circular business model innovation. For each high-level strategy key questions were formulated to assess the environmental impact reduction of the new circular business model. It was found that the strategies and guiding principles help stimulate debate on the environmental direction of new circular business models. This work has provided insights to guide a potential direction for assessing the environmental impact of new circular business models, and added to the sparse body of literature in this field. Keywords: Circularity assessment; circular business; sustainability assessment; sustainable business; circular design; streamlined LCA.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Assessing'the'environmental'impact'of'new'Circular'business'models'
!
!"#$%&%#'%()*%+(,-./#%..(0"1%2.)(3(4562"&/#7(8('98#7/#7(:/%+("#("&78#/;/#7(
:82-%('&%8</"#(=(>"-2"-.%?(@&8#'%?(AB3AC(D-#%(EFAB(
!
!
!
Nancy!Bocken1,2,*,!Karen!Miller3!and!Steve!Evans1!
A(G#/:%&./<H("$(!8IJ&/17%?(K%68&<I%#<("$(4#7/#%%&/#7?(L#.</<-<%($"&(
08#-$8'<-&/#7?(AC(!98&2%.(,8JJ87%(M"81?(!8IJ&/17%(!,N(F@O?(G#/<%1(P/#71"I(
Q#I6JER'8IS8'S-T((
E(K%2$<(G#/:%&./<H("$(>%'9#"2"7H?(L#1-.<&/82(K%./7#(4#7/#%%&/#7(UJ-/21/#7(NEV?(K%2$<(
G#/:%&./<H("$(>%'9#"2"7H?(W8#1J%&7.<&88<(AX?(EBEY(!4(K%2$<?(>9%(*%<9%&28#1.
N(G#/:%&./<H("$(,&/79<"#?(0/<9&8.(Z"-.%?(W%+%.(M"81?(,&/79<"#?(,*E([\>?(G#/<%1(
P/#71"IS
!!
Abstract''
Circular!business!models!are!increasingly!viewed!as!a!key!driver!for!business!
competitiveness!and!sustainability.!Yet!it!is!unclear!what!the!positive!(or!negative)!
environmental!impact!of!such!new!business!models!might!be.!Existing!methods!such!as!
Life!Cycle!Assessment!and!Mass!Flow!Analysis,!typically!more!suited!for!product-level!
and!material-level!environmental!assessment!respectively,!may!be!modified!to!assess!
the!impact!of!new!circular!business!models.!However,!these!might!be!too!time!and!
resource-intensive!to!effectively!guide!decision-making.!Building!on!earlier!work!on!
circular!design!and!business!models,!the!performance!economy!and!life!cycle!and!
systems!thinking,!this!work!proposes!a!list!of!guiding!principles!to!start!assessing!the!
impact!of!new!circular!business!models.!The!guiding!principles!are!organised!according!
to!the!following!high-level!strategies:!Slowing!effects;!Closing!effects;!Life!cycle!effects,!
and!Systems!effects.!Slowing!effects!are!linked!to!long!lasting!products!and!extending!
product!life!as!part!of!the!new!business!model.!Closing!effects!relate!to!the!potential!for!
recycling,!or!product!life!post-consumer!use,!as!a!result!of!the!circular!business!model!
innovation.!Life!cycle!effects!are!the!effects!not!yet!captured!within!these!slowing!and!
closing!effects,!which!arise!across!the!product!life!cycle!from!raw!material!sourcing!up!
until!production,!transport,!use!and!disposal!of!products.!Finally,!Systems!effects!are!the!
wider!impacts!of!circular!business!model!innovation.!For!each!high-level!strategy!key!
questions!were!formulated!to!assess!the!environmental!impact!reduction!of!the!new!
circular!business!model.!
It!was!found!that!the!strategies!and!guiding!principles!help!stimulate!debate!on!the!
environmental!direction!of!new!circular!business!models.!This!work!has!provided!
insights!to!guide!a!potential!direction!for!assessing!the!environmental!impact!of!new!
circular!business!models,!and!added!to!the!sparse!body!of!literature!in!this!field.!'
Keywords:'!/&'-28&/<H(8..%..I%#<]('/&'-28&(J-./#%..](.-.<8/#8J/2/<H(8..%..I%#<](
.-.<8/#8J2%(J-./#%..]('/&'-28&(1%./7#](.<&%8I2/#%1(W!\S('
1.'Introduction''
The!Circular!Economy!is!increasingly!viewed!as!a!key!driver!for!business!competitiveness!
and!future!sustainability!under!increasing!resource!scarcity.!The!switch!from!the!current!
linear!economy!to!a!circular!one!has!recently!attracted!attention!from!major!global!
companies!and!policymakers!(Lewandowski,!2016).!The!Ellen!MacArthur!Foundation!
(2015),!whose!mission!is!to!accelerate!the!move!to!a!circular!economy,!regards!the!
circular!economy!as!essential!in!reshaping!resource!utilization!and!a!resilient!economy.!!
Scholars!view!the!circular!economy!as!a!key!driver!for!sustainability;!however,!to!enable!
this!transition,!business!models,!product!design!and!supply!chains!need!to!change!
(Rashid!et!al.,!2013;!Bocken!et!al.,!2016).!!Business!models!are!viewed!as!a!key!lever!to!
change!to!business!as!usual!(Chesbrough,!2010)!and!can!be!an!important!driver!for!
business!sustainability!(Bocken!et!al.,!2013).!However,!the!literature!on!the!potential!
impact!of!such!new!business!models,!with!the!exception!of!conceptual!work!by!Tukker!
(2004;!2015)!for!example,!is!yet!sparse.!Currently,!it!is!unknown!what!the!potential!
positive!(or!negative!impact)!of!such!new!business!models!could!be.!!
This!paper!addresses!the!following!research!question:!Z"+('8#(<9%(%#:/&"#I%#<82(
/I68'<("$('/&'-28&(J-./#%..(I"1%2.(J%(8..%..%1^(
Building!on!earlier!work!on!circular!design!and!business!models!(Bocken!et!al.,!2016),!
the!performance!economy!(Stahel,!2010)!and!life!cycle!and!systems!thinking,!this!work!
proposes!a!list!of!guiding!principles!to!start!assessing!the!impact!of!such!new!circular!
business!models.!This!paper!first!reviews!the!literature!on!circular!business!models!and!
environmental!assessment.!Subsequently!a!brief!illustrative!case!of!the!proposed!
framework!of!circular!guiding!principles!is!developed.!Finally,!suggestions!for!future!
research!in!the!area!of!circular!business!models!are!developed.!!
2.'Literature'on'environmental'assessment'and'circular'economy'
This!section!contains!a!brief!overview!of!literature!on!circular!business!models,!relevant!
environmental!assessment!methods!and!the!research!gap.!!
2.1'Circular'business'models''
Circular!business!models!first!optimise!the!value!of!products!through!reuse!and!long!
product!lifetimes,!and!second!enable!closed!loop!recycling!with!a!viable!business!case.!!
In!a!circular!economy,!products!are!designed!for!multiple!uses!or!even!lifecycles!(Rashid!
et!al.,!2013).!Stahel!(1994,!p.!179;!2010),!referred!to!“closed!loop!systems”!and!
distinguished!two!fundamentally!different!types!of!loops!within!a!closed!loop!system:!
(1)!reuse!of!goods,!and!(2)!recycling!of!materials.!Building!on!this,!Bocken!et!al.!(2016)!
define!three!strategies!for!the!move!towards!a!circular!economy:!!Slowing!loops!(reuse),!
closing!loops!(recycling)!and!narrowing!loops!(efficiency)!(see!Figure!1).!!
!
Figure'1.'Framework'of'closing,'slowing'and'narrowing'resource'loops.'Bocken'et'al.'(2016)'
Whereas!‘narrowing!loops’!(e.g.!lightening!products!and!manufacturing!efficiencies)!
already!takes!place!in!a!linear!economy,!a!lot!of!work!still!needs!to!be!done!to!slow!and!
close!resource!loops.!!
Circular!business!models!may!be!viewed!as!a!subset!of!‘sustainable!business!models’!
(Stubbs!&!Cocklin,!2008),!which!take!into!account!multiple!stakeholder!concerns,!in!
particular!Society!and!Environment!in!the!way!that!business!is!done!and!performance!is!
defined.!However,!it!is!not!currently!clear!what!the!potential!impact!of!such!new!
business!models!may!be!and!how!these!might!contribute!to!sustainability.!
2.2'“Circular”'assessment'methods'
Environmental!assessment!tools!may!be!highly!qualitative!or!quantitative!as!explained!
according!to!the!classification!in!Figure!1.!Existing!quantitative!methods!such!as!Life!
Cycle!Assessment!and!Mass!Flow!Analysis!have!been!developed!and!used!to!assess!
product-level!and!material-level!environmental!assessment!respectively.!Life!Cycle!
Assessment!(LCA)!is!an!environmental!assessment!method,!which!may!assist!in!
identifying!opportunities!to!improve!the!environmental!performance!of!products,!
inform!decision!makers,!select!environmental!indicators!of!environmental!performance,!
and!support!marketing!statements!(ISO!14044,!2006).!Mass!Flow!Analysis!(MFA)!is!a!
method!of!investigating!flows!of!specific!materials!through!an!economic!system!in!a!
specific!geographic!area!during!a!certain!period!of!time!(Kytzia!et!al.,!2004).!!
LCA!typically!incorporates!the!end!of!life!stages!(e.g.!recyclability),!whereas!MFA!allows!
for!an!overview!of!a!‘system’!of!specific!flows!of!materials!over!time.!Indeed,!whereas!
MFA!is!often!used!to!address!issues!around!the!water-food-energy!nexus,!
environmental!and!human!health!and!economic!systems!(e.g.!material!flows!in!cities),!
LCA!analysis!is!typically!used!to!look!at!product!chains!as!well!as!user!behaviour!
(Blomsma,!2015).!!The!Circularity!Canvas!by!Blomsma!(2015)!brings!together!the!notions!
of!product!(re)!use!and!flows!of!materials!in!a!Sankey!diagram!depicting!resource!flows.!!
However,!in!the!early!phases!of!business!model!design,!similar!to!product!design,!
specific!design!parameters!are!yet!unknown.!Hence,!it!is!beneficial!to!integrate!
environmental!aspects!in!order!to!understand!environmental!impacts!right!from!the!
start,!when!the!greatest!impact!may!potentially!be!achieved,!and!parameters!altered!to!
derive!the!greatest!environmental!benefit!(Bocken!et!al.,!2014).!!While!this!phase!is!
largely!uncertain!and!the!details!of!design!still!need!resolving,!it!is!argued!here!that!rules!
of!thumb!and!guidelines!(Figure!2)!will!be!most!beneficial.!
!
!
Figure'2.'Classification'of'different'types'of'product-level'environmental'impact'assessment'tools'
Source:'Developed'from:'Bocken'&'Allwood'(2012)'adapted'from'Forum'for'the'Future'(2010)'
!
2.3'Research'gap'
While!the!work!on!a!Circular!Economy!has!received!increasing!interest!(Rashid!et!al.,!
2013)!there!is!still!substantial!uncertainty!on!the!potential!impact!of!new!circular!
!!
Rules of thumb
and checklists
Directional
tools
Full
LCA and
labelling
Streamlined
and matrix
based LCA
Qualitative Quantitative
Time-
consuming;
Later stages
Quick;
Early
stages
Time
needed for
analysis
&
Stage of
business
model
innovation
process
Nature of the assessment
business!models.!Few!if!any!suitable!tools!have!been!established!on!circularity!
assessment;!and!even!fewer!for!circular!business!models!specifically.!One!exception!is!
the!“Circularity!Canvas’!by!Blomsma!(2015),!which!can!help!visualise!resource!flows!in!a!
business.!However,!this!canvas!is!focused!more!on!mapping!current!resource!flows!than!
guiding!future!strategic!business!model!design.!This!paper!proposes!a!simple!method!to!
guide!the!development!of!new!circular!business!models!in!order!to!achieve!the!greatest!
environmental!benefit!when!design!parameters!are!still!flexible.!!
3.'Method'
The!proposed!method!was!developed!based!on!simple!and!fundamental!‘circularity!
strategies’!identified!from!the!literature!(Stahel,!1994,!p.!179;!2010;!and!Bocken!et!al.,!
2016).!
Stahel!(1994,!p.!179;!2010)!distinguished!two!fundamentally!different!types!of!loops!
that!support!the!move!to!a!circular!economy:!(1)!reuse!of!goods,!and!(2)!recycling!of!
materials.!Based!on!these,!Bocken!et!al.!(2016)!defined!three!strategies!for!the!move!
towards!a!circular!economy:!!slowing!loops!(reuse),!closing!loops!(recycling)!and!
narrowing!loops!(efficiency).!!!
As!a!result,!the!following!high-level!strategies!were!developed:!Slowing!effects;!Closing!
effects;!Life!cycle!effects,!and!Systems!effects.!!
In!line!with!Stahel,!Slowing!and!Closing!effects!are!most!important!in!a!circular!economy!
(Stahel,!1994,!p.!179;!2010).!Slowing!effects!are!linked!to!long!lasting!products!and!
extending!product!life!as!part!of!the!new!business!model!(Bocken!et!al,!2016).!Closing!
effects!are!in!essence!about!assessing!the!potential!for!recycling,!or!what!happens!to!
products!post-consumer!use,!as!a!result!of!the!circular!business!model!innovation!
(Bocken!et!al,!2016).!Life!cycle!effects!are!the!effects!not!yet!captured!within!these!
slowing!and!closing!effects,!which!arise!across!the!product!life!cycle!from!raw!material!
sourcing,!up!until!production,!transport,!use!and!disposal!of!products.!The!idea!of!‘life!
cycle!effects’!is!derived!from!LCA,!which!takes!a!product!life!cycle!perspective!(ISO!
14044,!2006).!Finally,!Systems!effects!are!the!wider!impacts!of!the!circular!business!
model!innovation.!MFA!also!takes!a!‘systems!view’,!e.g.!the!flows!of!a!material!in!an!
economic!system!(Kytzia!et!al.,!2004).!!However,!in!this!case,!the!effects!might!be!the!
wider!changes!or!impacts!that!the!new!circular!business!model!might!have!on!society!or!
other!businesses.!!
For!each!of!these!high-level!strategies!key!questions!were!formulated!to!assess!the!
environmental!impact!reduction!or!improvement!of!new!circular!business!models.!A!set!
of!circular!guiding!principles!(i.e.!key!questions)!was!developed!for!each!of!these!
environmental!strategies!–!slowing,!closing,!life!cycle!and!systems!strategies!and!effects.!
Table!1!includes!the!high-level!circularity!strategies.!
>8J2%(AS(!/&'-28&/<H(.<&8<%7/%.(1%:%2"6%1(/#(<9/.(&%.%8&'9S(
Slowing'effects'
U2"#7(28.</#7(6&"1-'<.(8#1(%5<%#1/#7(6&"1-'<(
2/$%V(
'
Closing'effects'
U&%'H'2/#7V(
Life'cycle'effects'
U%$$%'<.(8'&"..(&8+(I8<%&/82(."-&'/#7?(
6&"1-'</"#?(<&8#.6"&<?(-.%(8#1(1/.6".823((#"<(H%<(
'86<-&%1V'
'
Systems'effects'
U+/1%&(/I68'<.("$(<9%(/##":8</"#V(
!
!
This!approach!was!further!developed!and!tested!through!a!case!study!in!the!clothing!
retail!industry!(specifically,!a!fashion!retailer).!The!case!company!aims!to!reduce!waste!
through!new!circular!business!models.!While!‘waste!reduction’!was!the!main!metric,!the!
improvement!in!waste!reduction!was!not!at!the!expense!of!other!environmental!metrics!
such!as!water!usage!and!carbon!emissions.!The!company!wants!to!investigate!the!
reduction!in!waste!of!new!business!models!before!allocating!significant!resources!to!
implementing!a!certain!business!model.!!
The!aim!of!the!approach!developed!in!this!research!was!to!help!companies!in!the!move!
to!a!circular!economy.!The!quick!assessment!method!developed!can!help!test!the!
environmental!viability!of!new!circular!business!models.!!
The!approach!was!used!in!two!instances!by!the!case!company:!firstly!in!earlier!phases!of!
business!model!development!and!secondly!as!background!material!for!a!more!in-depth!
business!model!development!workshop.!!!
4.'Circular'business'models'–'rapid'environmental'assessment''
Table!2!includes!the!Rapid!Circularity!Assessment!(RCA)!to!assess!the!environmental!
impact!of!new!circular!business!model!ideas!for!clothing!retailers.!!
>8J2%(ES(M86/1(!/&'-28&/<H(\..%..I%#<(UM!\V(
!
Flows'–'XX'items'sold'annually'by'
COMPANY'
'
Closing'
effects'
UM%'H'2/#7V'
Key'questions'to'consider:'
1.!Does!it!increase!the!&%'H'28J/2/<H!of!new!COMPANY!
clothes!being!manufactured?!(E.g.!consider!design!
for!disassembly!and!keeping!technical!and!biological!
materials!separate)!
2.!Does!it!increase!&%'H'2/#7(&8<%.($"&!new!COMPANY!
clothes!being!manufactured?!(E.g.!by!ensuring!that!
used!product!collection!at!the!end!of!the!useful!
product!life!time,!a!product!deposit!system,!or!
leasing,!where!the!material!remains!in!the!ownership!
of!the!company)!
!
Estimated!impact:!xxx!reduction!in!waste!
Confidence:!low,!medium,!high!'
Slowing'
effects'
UW"#7(28.</#7(
6&"1-'<.(
8#1(
%5<%#1/#7(
6&"1-'<(2/$%V(
(
'''''''''t'
'
Key'questions'to'consider:'
1.!!Does!it!increase!the!useful!lifetime!of!#%+!
garments!(e.g.!through!maintenance!and!care,!
repair,!re-manufacture,!reuse)?!
2.!!Does!it!reduce!total!#%+!garment!production?!
!
!
Estimated!impact:!xxx!reduction!in!waste!
Confidence:!low,!medium,!high!
Life'cycle'
effects'
U4$$%'<.(
8'&"..(&8+(
Key'questions'to'consider:'
1.!Does!it!lead!to!any!‘design!efficiencies’!(e.g.!less!
material!per!product)?!
2.!Does!it!lead!to!any!manufacturing!efficiencies?!
Garment!Stocks!
6bn!in!UK!!
(100!pp)!
!
COMPANY!a nnual!garment!item!sales!(XX)!
)(350m)present)!
I8<%&/82(
."-&'/#7?(
6&"1-'</"#?(
<&8#.6"&<?(
-.%(8#1(
1/.6".823(#"<(
H%<(
'86<-&%1V'
'
'
'
(Consider!material!extraction/!production!and!
garment!production)!
3.!Does!it!lead!to!any!transportation!savings?!
4.!Does!it!lead!to!more!efficient!or!less!cleaning?!
5.!Does!it!lead!to!cleaner!forms!of!recycling!not!
captured!yet?!(E.g.!less!toxic,!biodegradable)?!
6.!Does!it!lead!to!any!other!efficiencies!not!yet!
captured!(e.g.!sale!stock/over!ordering!
samples/fabrics,!no!ironing!needed!etc.)!
!
Estimated!impact:!xxx!reduction!in!waste!and!other!
environmental!categories!
Confidence:!low,!medium,!high!
Systems'
effects'
U_/1%&(
/I68'<.("$(
<9%(
/##":8</"#V(
Key'questions'to'consider:'
1. Does!it!lead!to!negative!rebound!effects!(e.g.!consuming!more)!or!positive!ones!(e.g.!from!fast!to!slow!
fashion)?!
2. Are!there!any!unintended!consequences!by!upcycling!the!value!of!waste!(e.g.,!where!textiles!are!used!
as!a!low!cost!filler!what!is!likely!replacement!if!we!can!divert!textile!waste)?!
3. Does!it!lead!to!radical!changes!for!stores!and!employees?!What!are!the!impacts!on!those!stakeholders!
and!others?!Who!are!the!potential!winners/!losers?!!
4. What!is!the!effect!of!multiple!co-existing!business!models?!!
5. What!is!the!impact!on!society!of!this!innovation?!!
6. What!is!required!for!other!companies!to!follow!–!is!that!considered!in!this!new!business!model?!
!
Estimated!impact:!xxx!reduction!in!waste!and!other!sustainability!categories!-!other!positive!and!negative!impacts!
Confidence:!low,!medium,!high!
*"<%S(>9%.%(8&%(7-/1/#7(`-%.</"#.(<"($8'/2/<8<%(H"-&(8#82H./.S(a2%8.%(811(8.(&%`-/&%1(<"(8#82H.%(H"-&(/1%8.S(>9%(GP(
78&I%#<(.<"'T.(18<8("$(BJ#(/<%I.(8&%(&%<&/%:%1($&"I(_M\a(UEFAEVS((
(
!
The!assessment!is!organised!according!to!the!effects!in!Table!1!–!Slowing,!closing,!life!
cycle!and!systems!effects.!In!addition,!it!was!recognized!that!some!innovations!could!
have!effects!on!the!flows!of!new!materials!(left!column)!of!products!sold!by!the!
company,!while!others!could!help!improve!the!usage!of!the!existing!clothing!stock!(right!
column;!clothing!already!in!circulation,!but!may!remain!unused).!WRAP!UK!for!example!
estimates!that!the!average!UK!household!owns!around!£4,000!worth!of!clothes!–!and!
around!30%!of!clothing!in!wardrobes!has!not!been!worn!for!at!least!a!year!(WRAP,!
2012).!The!assessment!method!allows!companies!to!go!through!each!of!the!questions!
step-by-step!to!assess!their!business!models.!
!
This!method!has!been!used!by!the!case!company!in!two!ways:!
1.!The!strategies!in!Table!1!have!been!used!in!the!early!stages!of!business!model!
development!when!changes!could!still!be!made.!It!helped!the!company!identify!business!
models!that!slow!and!close!loops.!
2.!The!strategies!in!Table!2!have!been!used!as!background!material!for!an!in-depth!
business!model!design!workshop.!They!were!used!to!support!further!business!model!
development!and!refinement.!!
'
Through!usage!in!these!two!ways,!it!was!found!that!the!environmental!strategies!and!
guiding!principles!could!help!stimulate!debate!on!the!environmental!direction!of!new!
circular!business!models.!They!can!help!improve!the!environmental!performance!of!
such!new!business!models!at!the!early!stages!of!business!model!innovation.!
!
5.''Conclusion'and'discussion''
The!Rapid!Circularity!Assessment!(RCA)!was!developed!to!support!companies!in!circular!
business!model!innovation!to!help!them!consider!the!most!environmentally!beneficial!
options!and!make!changes!to!the!design!while!these!are!feasible.!Through!the!case!
study!there!are!early!indications!that!this!method!is!beneficial.!However,!significant!
further!testing!and!development!is!required.!Nevertheless,!the!guiding!principles!could!
serve!as!an!input!to!more!detailed!LCA!or!MFA!work.!For!example,!it!can!help!build!the!
assessment!framework!and!assumptions!for!a!detailed!LCA!(ISO!14044,!2006).!It!can!also!
help!focus!the!analysis!and!draw!boundaries!for!MFA.!
This!work!has!provided!insights!in!a!potential!direction!for!assessing!the!environmental!
impact!of!new!circular!business!models!and!contributed!to!the!scant!body!of!literature!
in!the!field.!The!RCA!method!provides!an!indication!on!whether!the!business!model!is!
going!in!a!fruitful!direction!before!committing!excessive!resources!and!embarking!on!
deeper!modelling.!Future!work!could!focus!on!environmental!assessment!methods!
across!the!full!spectrum!illustrated!in!Figure!2!–!from!rules!of!thumb!up!until!highly!
detailed!quantitative!assessment.!Finally,!more!circular!business!models!are!needed!in!
practice!to!be!able!to!assess!their!impact!after!implementation!and!guide!future!
business!model!development.!
!!
Acknowledgements''
Project!funding!was!secured!through!InnovateUK’s!funding!call!“Supply!chain!innovation!
towards!a!circular!economy”!!(InnovateUK,!2013).!!
Short'bio'of'the'authors'
Dr'Nancy'Bocken!is!an!associate!professor!at!TU!Delft,!Industrial!Design!Engineering.!
She!was!awarded!the!TU!Delft!Technology!Fellowship!to!pursue!her!research!in!
sustainable!business!models,!and!innovation!for!a!circular!economy.!She!has!an!
appointment!at!University!of!Cambridge!as!a!senior!research!associate!and!is!Fellow!at!
the!Cambridge!Institute!for!Sustainability!Leadership.!While!her!broader!interest!is!
closing!the!“idea-action!gap”!in!sustainability,!her!research!focus!is!on!sustainable!
business!model!innovation.!Nancy!holds!a!PhD!from!the!University!of!Cambridge,!
funded!by!Unilever.!In!the!past,!she!worked!for!DHL,!Accenture,!and!ING.!
Dr'Karen'Miller!is!a!Senior!Lecturer!in!Business!Studies!for!Fashion!&!Textiles!and!
Fashion!Communications!at!the!University!of!Brighton.!Additionally,!she!is!a!Visiting!
Industrial!Fellow!for!Industrial!Systems!Manufacturing!&!Management!at!the!Institute!
for!Manufacturing,!University!of!Cambridge.!At!Cambridge!she!is!also!conducting!
research!with!the!Centre!for!Industrial!Sustainability!on!developing!more!sustainable!
approaches!in!fashion!retailing.!Her!main!research!interests!are!leadership!for!design!
and!innovation,!and!sustainable!business!development!in!fashion.!!
Prof'Steve'Evans'spent!12!years!in!industry,!finally!as!Engineering!Systems!Manager!at!
Martin-Baker!Engineering,!the!world-leading!manufacturer!of!ejection!seats.!He!became!
Professor!of!Life!Cycle!Engineering!at!Cranfield!University!in!1998!and!joined!the!
University!of!Cambridge!Institute!for!Manufacturing!in!2011.!He!is!Director!of!the!
national!EPSRC!Centre!in!Industrial!Sustainability,!with!over!50!staff.!His!research!seeks!a!
deep!understanding!of!how!industry!brings!environmental!and!social!sustainability!
concerns!into!its!design!and!manufacturing!practices,!with!an!emphasis!on!urgent!and!
practical!change!now!and!system!level!change!that!offers!hope!for!a!sustainable!future.!'
References'
Blomsma,! F.! 2015.! Navigating! the!circular! economy:! the! particle-versus-product! debate.! Global! Cleaner!
Production!&!Sustainable!Consumption!Conference,!1!-!4!November!2015,!Sitges,!Barcelona,!Spain.!
!
Bocken,! N.M.P.,! de! Pauw,! I.,! van! der! Grinten,! B.,!Bakker,! C.! 2016.! Product! design! and! business! model!
strategies!for!a!circular!economy.!Journal!of!Industrial!and!Production!Engineering,!32!(1),!67-81.!
!
Bocken,!N.,!Allwood,!J.!2012.!Strategies!to!reduce!the!carbon!footprint!of!consumer!goods!by!influencing!
stakeholders.!Journal!of!Cleaner!Production,!35,!118-129.!
!
Bocken,!N.,!Farracho,!M.,!Bosworth,!R.,!Kemp,!R.!2014.!The!front-end!of!eco-innovation!for!eco-innovative!
small!and!medium!sized!companies.!Journal!of!Engineering!and!Technology!Management,!31,!4357.!
!
Bocken,!N.,!Short,! S.,! Rana,! P.,! Evans,! S.! 2013.! A! value! mapping! tool! for! sustainable! business! modelling.!
Corporate!Governance,!13!(5),!482!–!497.!
!
Chesbrough,! H.! 2010.! Business! Model! Innovation:!Opportunities! and! Barriers.! Long! Range! Planning! 43,!
354-363.!
!
Ellen!McArthur!Foundation.!2015.!Home!page.!Available!at:!https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/!
(accessed!!27!May!2016).!
!
Forum! for! the! Future.! 2010.! Metrics.! Retrieved! from! the! WWW! December! 2010:!
http://www.forumforthefuture.org/projects/metrics!
!
INNOVATEUK.! 2013.! O-662H( '98/#( /##":8</"#( <"+8&1.( 8( '/&'-28&( %'"#"IHS( \:8/28J2%( 8<b(
https://interact.innovateuk.org/competition-display-page/-
/asset_publisher/RqEt2AKmEBhi/content/supply-chain-innovation-towards-a-circular-economy#:! UK!
Government!(Accessed!27!May!2016).!
!
ISO!14044.!2006.!Environmental!management!—!Life!cycle!assessment!—!Principles!and!!framework.!
International!Organization!for!Standardization.!2nd!ed.!
!
Kytzia,!S.,!FAist,!M.,!Baccini,!P.!2004.!Economically!extendedMFA:!a!material!flow!approach!for!a!better!
understanding!of!food!production!chain.!Journal!of!Cleaner!Production!12,!877889.!
!
Lewandowski,! M.! 2016.! Designing! the! Business! Models! for! Circular! EconomyTowards! the! Conceptual!
Framework.!Sustainability,!8(1),!43;!doi:10.3390/su8010043.!
!
Rashid,! A.,! Asif,! F.,! Krajnik,! P.,! Nicolescu,! C.! 2013.! Resource! Conservative! Manufacturing:! an! essential!
change! in! business! and! technology! paradigm! for! sustainable! manufacturing.! Journal! of! Cleaner!
Production,!57,!166-177.!
!
Stahel,!W.!R.,!1994.!“The!utilization!focused!service!economy:!Resource!efficiency,”!in!B.!R.!Allenby!and!D.!
J.!Richards!(eds),!The!Greening! of!Industrial!Ecosystems,! National!Academy!Press,!Washington,!DC,!178
190!(1994).!
!
Stahel,!W.!R.!2010.!The!performance!economy,!Palgrave!Macmillan!Hampshire,!UK.!
!
Stubbs,! W.,! Cocklin,! C.! 2008.! Conceptualizing! a! “sustainability! business! model”.! Organization! &!
Environment,!21(2),!103-127.!
!
Tukker,!A.,!2004.!Eight!types!of!product-service!system:!eight!ways!to!sustain-!ability?!Business!Strategy!&!
the!Environment,!13!(4),!246-260.!
Tukker,!A.,!2015.!Product!services!for!a!resource-efficient!and!circular!economy–!a!review,!Journal!of!
Cleaner!Production,!97,!76-91.!!
WRAP.!2012.!WRAP.!Valuing!our!clothes.!Available!at:!http://www.wrap.org.uk/content/valuing-our-
clothes!(Accessed!27!May!2016)!!
... Many types of tools exist in both academia and practice for assessing the environmental impact of business models (Pieroni et al., 2019). However, most of these existing methods focus only on the product or material-low levels (Bocken, Miller, et al., 2016;Moraga et al., 2019;Walzberg et al., 2021). Some examples of commonly used impact assessment tools are Input/Output Analysis, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material Flow Analysis, Recycling E ficiency Rate, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Indicators, and Internal Reporting Guidelines (Moraga et al., 2019;Sassanelli et al., 2019;Walzberg et al., 2021). ...
... Further, most business model ideation tools do not factor in rebound effects and thus, do not take the final environmental impact into account (Castro et al., 2022;Pieroni et al., 2019). Our tool bridges this gap in business model experimentation research (Blomsma & Tennant, 2020;Bocken, Miller, et al., 2016;Walzberg et al., 2021), and the findings can be useful for innovators, consultants, academics and businesses that are looking into the transition to circular business models. While our tool was specifically designed for the experimentation phase, we believe its use could be extended to the entire business model ideation phase. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Our current linear systems of production and consumption are based on a “take-make-waste” approach that prioritises volume over value. This approach is exacerbating climate disasters and poses a massive threat to the ecological systems necessary for human survival. At present we consume more resources every year than the planet can sustain in the long term. While these issues can be addressed through policy and consumer behaviour changes, businesses are very much part of the crisis and now also need to be part of the solution. Lately circular business models have gained attention as a possible way to help change consumption and production patterns through slowing, closing, narrowing, and regenerating resource loops. However, the true impact of these new business model innovations remains unclear, recent research has uncovered rebound effects and unintended consequences that can counteract their environmental impact reduction potential. Further, given the damage done to the planet, there is a need to design more radical regenerative business models that focus on doing ‘more good’ rather than just ‘less harm’. This book represents the summation of five research studies carried out over the 4 years of my PhD that aimed to advance understanding of how circular business models can be improved, and how experimentation towards better business models can be fostered. In doing so, I investigate the questions of how companies measure environmental impact of new circular business model innovations? How are these innovations affected by rebound effects? And how can we create more regenerative business models which take more responsibility towards the socio-ecological systems that they operate in? It is my hope that the insights of this thesis can be useful in aiding the transition of businesses to better business models.
... Product life cycle extension refers to strategies and design innovations that extend the usable life of a product by increasing its durability, enabling reuse, repair, remanufacturing or upgrading of components [10]. It is a central principle of the circular economy, an alternative to the traditional linear economic model. ...
Article
Full-text available
A significant shift towards sustainability and environmental responsibility is currently occurring in the global economic landscape. This change was facilitated by a better understanding of the limitations and constraints of the linear economic model. The inadequacy of the linear model necessitates the transition towards a circular business model (CBM) that minimizes waste and enhances resource longevity. The main purpose of this study is to understand the factors leading to CBM adoption and to further explore its impact on a firm’s performance. The proposed framework was tested and empirically verified using the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique on data collected from 300 manufacturing firms. The findings show that circular infrastructure is the most important antecedent of CBM adoption, followed by resource optimization. Furthermore, the moderating effect of dynamic capabilities has also been confirmed for CBM adoption and firm performance. The findings of this study contribute to expanding the extant knowledge corpus and provide strategic guidance for firms seeking a transition towards circularity principles and sustainable business model innovations. Adopting a circular business model will help firms improve their financial performance, gain a competitive edge, and build long-term resilience in the face of environmental and market uncertainties.
... Narrowing loops means reducing resource use. Slowing loops involves extending the lifespan of building elements and introducing flexibility and reversibility [7]. To slow the material loop within circular strategies, flexible building element designs can be opted for. ...
Article
Full-text available
The transition towards sustainable construction is crucial, and demountable building elements are frequently advocated for achieving this goal. While these elements offer relocatability during refurbishments, their adoption may increase initial environmental impact due to higher material use and steel connections. To address this, a quantitative assessment of demountable building elements in refurbishment scenarios at the building level is needed, filling a gap in the existing literature. This study bridges the gap by comparing the total environmental impact of demountable and traditional space-dividing walls in refurbishment scenarios for a semi-detached dwelling. Using a life cycle assessment, seven space-dividing wall types, including metal studs, wood structures, and masonry walls, are evaluated under four refurbishment scenarios spanning a 60-year building lifespan. The results reveal that traditional metal stud walls have a lower environmental impact in scenarios with limited refurbishments. In contrast, demountable walls become more environmentally beneficial only when refurbishing at least 60% of the wall area with three or more refurbishments. This conclusion was further validated through sensitivity analysis on the refurbishment rate, refurbished area, and impact assessment method. In this study, the assumed environmental benefits of demountable walls are challenged, providing a robust evaluation in a specific building typology and offering insights for policymakers and industry professionals on the environmental implications of incorporating demountable building elements.
... New variables have to be considered, for instance, reverse on top of forward logistics; quality, quantity and timing of returns of resources; customers perceptions and preferences for 'as new' (Bocken et al. 2018). This requires a systemic and transdisciplinary view, which has been reflected in recent publications exploring the interfaces of CE-oriented Business Model Innovation (BMI) with other innovation perspectives, such as product design, value chain and digital technologies (Bocken et al. 2016;Foss and Saebi 2017;Geissdoerfer et al. 2018). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Literature on business models is a pillar of management research and its recent contributions have broadened traditional frameworks to include sustainability and circular economy issues. However, contributions focused on business models of cultural heritage have always been scarce; moreover, most of the studies on adaptive reuse of cultural heritage are based on the analysis of individual assets. A few studies make in-depth analysis of the business model and they hardly produce generalizable results, due to the idiosyncratic nature of cultural heritage and its link with the cultural, social, environmental and economic context, that makes it difficult to replicate the process and decisions of reuse (in structural and managerial terms).
... Thus, CE implementation not only involves tangible operations but also essentially includes the social efforts of actors on these three levels towards systemic change. Circular business models thus can enable economically viable ways to continually reuse products and materials, using renewable resources where possible (Bocken et al. 2016). The circular economy theory has received widespread acceptance during the last few decades. ...
Book
Full-text available
Lessons from Pandemic: Reimagining Supply Chain, Logistics & Operations Proceedings of International Conference in Emerging Trends in Supply Chain & Operations (ICESCO)
Article
In order to reduce mass disposal, it is necessary to design and develop products with long lifetimes. However, few studies have investigated long-life design in terms of value lifetime compared with physical lifetime. Product value consists of use value, Kansei value, and economic value, and the product value lifetime is considered to be reached when any one of these values is lost. Few studies have considered the Kansei value (that is, the perceived or emotional value of a product) and the regional differences in sensitivity to products. In this study focusing on attachment, we analyzed attachment strategies for the design of products with long value lifetimes and examined the regional differences in sensitivity to product attachment. We identified design strategies that are strongly correlated with attachment in Vietnam and Thailand. We also found that Japanese users are less attached to their products than users in Vietnam and Thailand. The findings of this study will contribute to the design of long-life products with high Kansei values.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter discusses the revolutionary idea of a circular economy within the textile industry and highlights how it could entirely change the manner in which textiles are made, used, and disposed of. The second-most polluting industry in the world is textile industry, which is recognized for leaving a significant environmental footprint. The textile industry consumes 35% of all pesticides. A feasible way of dealing with these environmental issues while also generating economic benefits is to move towards a circular economy. Moreover, the chapter describes how a circular strategy might take the place of the traditional linear model, which is characterized by resource depletion and waste generation. The environmental effects of the industry are considerably reduced in a circular economy by the utilization of recycled or sustainably sourced materials, energy-efficient procedures, and eco-friendly colors. Furthermore, the circular economy encourages local manufacturing and distribution, which reduces distant travel's energy consumption and emissions. The requirement for frequent substitutions is reduced, resources are conserved, and waste is reduced by enhancing the lifespan of textiles through resilient design and maintenance procedures. Stronger governance, collaboration, and changes in consumer behavior are essential in accelerating this transition. Governments must establish laws and policies that encourage sustainability. While funding and cooperation are essential for innovation and systemic change. Developing the full potential of a circular economy in the textile industry will depend on changing customer behaviors through education and easily accessible alternatives that are environmentally friendly.
Thesis
Full-text available
The circular economy (CE) has become a driving paradigm for businesses and their supply chain partners. While companies are starting to embrace CE practices, i.e. circular business models, strategies and product solutions, the sustainability impacts of these practices with regards to the UN Sustainable Development Goals are not necessarily assessed. Given the collaborative nature of CE practices, involving actors along the whole product life cycle, this thesis focuses on sustainability assessment within circular inter-firm networks and how this assessment can meaningfully contribute to decision-making. Through a systematic literature review within the fields of industrial ecology (IE) and circular supply chain management (CSCM), suitable assessment approaches in literature were identified and integrated into a framework. The framework is divided into evaluation approaches, dominated by IE approaches, and decision-supporting approaches, where CSCM approaches are prevalent. It emerged that approaches based on life cycle thinking (LCT) are amongst the most frequently applied in both fields. The assessment approaches from literature were then compared to the actual assessment practices of 43 companies active with CE practices in Italy and the Netherlands. While the academic assessment approaches were both quantitative and qualitative, most of the approaches applied in practice were qualitative. One exception were the LCT methodologies, such as life cycle assessment (LCA) and the carbon footprint, which were frequently employed by respondents. Besides assessment, practitioners underlined the importance of close relationships and trust when initiating CE practices and assessing them. The thesis also lines out four criteria for sound sustainability assessment in circular inter-firm networks: balance of sustainability dimensions; the intergenerational nature of sustainability; stakeholder involvement; and LCT. Both the assessment approaches from literature and practice were then benchmarked against these criteria. As emerged from this research, the social sustainability aspects are less frequently addressed than the environmental and economic ones. This is connected to the social dimension’s conceptualisation in the fields of IE and supply chain management, two fields that struggled with integrating the social aspects, which has now also become an issue for inter-firm networks in CE itself. After all, the social assessment approaches are diverse, inherently context-dependent and mandate stakeholder inclusion. Interviews also showed that there is no consensus amongst CE actors on whether the social dimension belongs to the CE concept or only to sustainability. However, this distinction was deemed to be obsolete for conducting an assessment in practice, given that social CE aspects are expected to be covered by corporate social responsibility policies. Of the 43 interviewed companies engaged with CE practices, less than half conducted some kind of social assessment, which was mostly qualitative; the main barriers were a lack of expertise and missing standards. The most prominent LCT-based social assessment methodology, the social LCA, is not yet well disseminated both in literature and practice, partially explained with its comparatively recent establishment, but, more importantly, due to its complexity and limited data availability. It was found that research should support companies in identifying the strategic relevance of social issues, which can then be managed through assessment, especially in the light of the Sustainable Development Goals. On top of the repertoire of assessment approaches, this thesis also presents two case studies that apply circularity and environmental sustainability assessment approaches. The first case is a multi-national packaging corporation, implementing a life cycle-based assessment approach in its sites in Italy and China. Using the dynamic capabilities perspective, it was analysed how the assessment practices can contribute to the company’s microfoundations and how they are connected to other microfoundations (such as strategic partnership and sustainability strategy). This helped to explain why and how life cycle-based assessments can play a strategic role in companies that want to make their business processes more circular, providing a science-based rational for prioritising strategies. Yet, higher circularity would not necessarily entail more favourable sustainability results, which is why circularity and sustainability assessment tools should be employed together. The second case study focuses on the adaptation of a LCA to its respective local context in Northern Italy. It compared the environmental impact of serving canteen food in single-use tableware from compostable plastics with the impact of reusable tableware made from ceramics, steel, and glass. Through the epistemological lens of the actor network theory, the end-of-life scenario of the LCA and the interpretation of its results were contextualised. The results showed that, in this example, there is no environmental argument in favour of compostable plastics. Actor network theory helped to better understand how the putative environmental friendliness of compostable plastics is framed by human and non-human actors (e.g. narratives, documents, infrastructure) within this circular inter-firm network. Meanwhile, the socio-economic implications of these two scenarios are yet to be analysed. It is further essential to understand the limitations of the LCA, given it can only provide a partial (limited set of impact categories) and unidimensional (focusing on environment) picture of a system’s sustainability. Moreover, LCA should thus not be viewed as neutral, but as an assessment approach that also mirrors the world view of LCA practitioners in their modelling choices. These considerations are especially relevant given the LCA methodology’s status as a best practice assessment approach in the CE context, bound to increase its application substantially.
Article
Full-text available
Human activity is increasingly impacting the environment negatively on all scales. There is an urgent need to transform human activity toward sustainable development. Business has a key role to play in this sustainability transition through technological, product and service, and process innovations, as well as innovative business models. Business models can enable new technologies, and vice versa. These models are therefore important in the transition to sustainability. Business models for sustainability, or synonymously, sustainable business models, take holistic views on how business is operated in relation to its stakeholders, including the society and the natural environment. They incorporate economic, environmental, and social aspects in an organization’s purpose and performance measures; consider the needs of all stakeholders rather than giving priority to owner and shareholder expectations; treat “nature” as a stakeholder; and take a system as well as a firm-level perspective on the way business is conducted. The research field of sustainable business models emerged from fields such as service business models, green and social business models, and concepts such as sharing and circular economy. Academics have argued that the most service-oriented business models can achieve a “factor 10” environmental impact improvement if designed the right way. Researchers have developed various conceptualizations, typologies, tools, and methods and reviews on sustainable business models. However, sustainable business models are not yet mainstream. Important research areas include the following: (a) tools, methods, and experimentation; (b) the assessment of sustainability impact and rebounds for different stakeholders; (c) sufficiency and degrowth; and (d) the twin revolution of sustainability and digital transition. First, a plethora of tools and approaches are available for inspiration and for creation of sustainable business model designs. Second, in the field of assessment, methods have been based on life cycle thinking considering the supply chain and how a product is (re)used and eventually disposed of. In the field of sufficiency, authors have recognized the importance of moderating consumption through innovative business models to reduce the total need for products, reducing the impact on the environment. Finally, researchers have started to investigate the important interplay between sustainability and digitalization. Because of the potential to achieve a factor 10 environmental impact improvement, sustainable business models are an important source of inspiration for further work, including the upscaling of sustainable business models in established businesses and in new ventures. Understanding how to design better business models and preempting their usage in practice are essential to achieve a desired positive impact. In the field of sufficiency, the macro-impacts of individual and business behavior would need to be better understood. In the area of digital innovation, environmental, societal, and economic values need scrutinization. Researchers and practitioners can leverage the popularity of this field by addressing these important areas to support the development and roll-out of sustainable business models with significantly improved economic, environmental, and societal impact.
Article
Full-text available
Even though the traction towards a circular economy (CE) is on the rise, and the benefits a CE has across ecological, economic, and social frontiers have been undeniable, still, CE-related developments and its adoption have not been appealing. This study conducts a systematic literature review of the CE-related literature in line with the ‘umbrella framework’ to find the current state of the diffusion and diversification of CE concepts both in the academic context as well as in application. Using a thematic and content analysis of the sampled literature, the study (i) develops a comprehensive and inclusive CE definition and (ii) examines the level of diffusion of CE in the economy. The study concludes that, even though CE-related developments are positive and promising, it is still in the validity phase of the umbrella framework and recommends focusing more on the application-based intervention of the CE.
Chapter
Full-text available
The performance economy is a concept which goes beyond most interpretations of a “circular economy”: the focus is on the maintenance and exploitation of stock (mainly manufactured capital) rather than linear or circular flows of materials or energy. The performance economy represents a full shift to servicisation, with revenue obtained from providing services rather than selling goods. While the form of industrial economy which has dominated the industrialised countries since the industrial revolution is arguably appropriate to overcome scarcities in a developing economy, the performance model is applicable in economies close to saturation, when the quantities of new goods entering use are similar to the quantities of goods being scrapped at the end of life.
Article
Full-text available
Switching from the current linear model of economy to a circular one has recently attracted increased attention from major global companies e.g., Google, Unilever, Renault, and policymakers attending the World Economic Forum. The reasons for this are the huge financial, social and environmental benefits. However, the global shift from one model of economy to another also concerns smaller companies on a micro-level. Thus, comprehensive knowledge on designing circular business models is needed to stimulate and foster implementation of the circular economy. Existing business models for the circular economy have limited transferability and there is no comprehensive framework supporting every kind of company in designing a circular business model. This study employs a literature review to identify and classify the circular economy characteristics according to a business model structure. The investigation in the eight sub-domains of research on circular business models was used to redefine the components of the business model canvas in the context of the circular economy. Two new components-the take-back system and adoption factors-have been identified, thereby leading to the conceptualization of an extended framework for the circular business model canvas. Additionally, the triple fit challenge has been recognized as an enabler of the transition towards a circular business model. Some directions for further research have been outlined, as well.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose – Although business models that deliver sustainability are increasingly popular in the literature, few tools that assist in sustainable business modelling have been identified. This paper investigates how businesses might create balanced social, environmental and economic value through integrating sustainability more fully into the core of their business. A value mapping tool is developed to help firms create value propositions better suited for sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – In addition to a literature review, six sustainable companies were interviewed to understand their approaches to business modelling, using a case study approach. Building on the literature and practice, a tool was developed which was pilot tested through use in a workshop. The resulting improved tool and process was subsequently refined through use in 13 workshops.
Article
Full-text available
This paper studies the Front End of Eco-Innovation (FEEI), the initial phase of the eco-innovation process. Incorporating environmental concerns at the front-end of innovation is important, as product parameters are still flexible. This paper investigates the FEEI for 42 small and medium sized eco-innovators in the Netherlands by using a survey. The results show that SMEs embrace informal, systematic, and open innovation approaches at the FEEI. Teams appear to be multidisciplinary, and creativity and environmental knowledge are essential. Experimentation played a significant role at the FEEI. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research and implications for managers.
Chapter
In the 1970s, the first wave of environmental regulation targeted specific sources of pollutants. In the 1990s, concern is focused not on the ends of pipes or the tops of smokestacks but on sweeping regional and global issues.This landmark volume explores the new industrial ecology, an emerging framework for making environmental factors an integral part of economic and business decision making. Experts on this new frontier explore concepts and applications, including Bringing international law up to par with many national laws to encourage industrial ecology principles.Integrating environmental costs into accounting systems.Understanding design for environment, industrial metabolism, and sustainable development and how these concepts will affect the behavior of industrial and service firms. The volume looks at negative and positive aspects of technology and addresses treatment of waste as a raw material.This volume will be important to domestic and international policymakers, leaders in business and
Article
The transition within business from a linear to a circular economy brings with it a range of practical challenges for companies. The following question is addressed: What are the product design and business model strategies for companies that want to move to a circular economy model? This paper develops a framework of strategies to guide designers and business strategists in the move from a linear to a circular economy. Building on Stahel, the terminology of slowing, closing, and narrowing resource loops is introduced. A list of product design strategies, business model strategies, and examples for key decision-makers in businesses is introduced, to facilitate the move to a circular economy. This framework also opens up a future research agenda for the circular economy.
Article
Since the 1990s, Product Service Systems (PSS) have been heralded as one of the most effective instruments for moving society towards a resource-efficient, circular economy and creating a much-needed ‘resource revolution’. This paper reviews the literature on PSS in the last decade and compares the findings with those from an earlier review in this journal in 2006. Close to 300 relevant papers were identified, over 140 of which have been referenced in this review. Research in the field of PSS has become more prolific, with the output of refereed papers quadrupling since 2000, while on average scientific output has only doubled. PSS has also become embedded in a wider range of science fields (such as manufacturing, ICT, business management, and design) and geographical regions (Asia now produces more papers than Europe). The literature of the last seven years has refined insights with regard to the design of PSS, as well as their business and environmental benefits, and confirmed the definitions and PSS concepts already available in 2006. A major contribution of the recent literature is research into how firms have implemented PSS in their organization and what the key success factors and issues that require special attention are (such as a focus on product availability for clients; an emphasis on diversity in terms of services provided rather than the range of products; and the need for staff to possess both knowledge of the product and relationship management skills). The reasons why PSS have nonetheless still not been widely implemented, particularly in the B2C context, seem to have already been explained fairly well in the literature available in 2006. For consumers, having control over things, artifacts, and life itself is one of the most valued attributes. PSS are often less accessible, or have less intangible value, than the competing product, in part because PSS usually do not allow consumers as much behavioral freedom or even leave them with the impression that the PSS provider could prescribe how they should behave.
Article
For sustainability of our future societies we need sustainable manufacturing strategies with resource and environment conservation as their integral part. In this perspective closed-loop supply chains are considered as the most feasible solution. However, their implementation within the paradigm of prevailing open-loop product systems seems extremely complicated and practically infeasible. This paper argues for a radical shift in thinking on the closed-loop systems and presents the novel concept of Resource Conservative Manufacturing (ResCoM). The ResCoM concept considers the conservation of energy, material and value added with waste prevention and environment protection as integrated components of the product design and development strategy. It also presents the innovative idea of products with multiple lifecycles where several lifecycles of predefined duration are determined already at the product design stage thus demanding for new design strategies and methodologies. To succeed with this concept ResCoM advocates for new approach to supply chain design and business models as well, where the customers are integral part of manufacturing enterprises and the product design is effectively connected with the supply chain design. This work concludes that the products, supply chains and the business models developed for open-loop product systems are unable to cope with the dynamics of closed-loop systems. The uncertainties associated with product returns are inherent to the conventional concept of lifecycle and closed-loop systems. The ResCoM concept has much better capability in dealing with these uncertainties while developing sustainable closed-loop systems. The presented work outlines and discusses the conceptual framework of ResCoM. A comprehensive work on the strategic and tactical issues in the implementation of the ResCoM concept will follow.
Article
Consumer goods contribute to anthropogenic climate change across their product life cycles through carbon emissions arising from raw materials extraction, processing, logistics, retail and storage, through to consumer use and disposal. How can consumer goods manufacturers make stepwise reductions in their product life cycle carbon emissions by engaging with, and influencing their main stakeholders? A semi-structured interview approach was used: to identify strategies and actions, stakeholders in the consumer goods industry (suppliers, manufacturers, retailers and NGOs) were interviewed about carbon emissions reduction projects. Based on this, a summarising presentation was made, which was shared during a second round of interviews to validate and refine the results. The results demonstrate several opportunities that have not yet been exploited by companies. These include editing product choice in stores to remove products with higher carbon footprints, using marketing competences for environmental benefits, and bundling competences to create win–win–win business models. Governments and NGOs have important enabling roles to accelerate industry change. Although this work was initially developed to explore how companies can reduce life cycle carbon emissions of their products, these strategies and actions also give insights on how companies can influence and anticipate stakeholder actions in general.