ArticlePDF Available


Recent decades have seen rapid growth in the science of subjective well-being (SWB), with 14,000 publications a year now broaching the topic. The insights of this growing scholarly literature can be helpful to psychologists working both in research and applied areas. We describe five sets of recent findings on SWB: (1) the multidimensionality of SWB; (2) circumstances that influence long-term SWB; (3) cultural differences in SWB; (4) the beneficial effects of SWB on health and social relationships; and (5) interventions to increase SWB. Additionally, we outline the implications of these findings for the helping professions, organizational psychology, and for researchers. Finally, we describe current developments in national accounts of well-being, which capture the quality of life in societies beyond economic indicators and point toward policies that can enhance societal well-being.
(in press). Canadian Psychology.
Findings All Psychologists Should Know From
The New Science on Subjective Well-Being
Ed Diener
University of Virginia and University of Utah
The Gallup Organization
Samantha J. Heintzelman, Kostadin Kushlev
University of Virginia
Louis Tay
Purdue University
Derrick Wirtz, Lesley D. Lutes
University of British Columbia
Shigehiro Oishi
University of Virginia
Subjective Well-Being
Recent decades have seen rapid growth in the science of subjective well-being (SWB), with
14,000 publications a year now broaching the topic. The insights of this growing scholarly
literature can be helpful to psychologists working both in research and applied areas. We
describe five sets of recent findings on SWB: (1) the multidimensionality of SWB; (2)
circumstances that influence long-term SWB; (3) cultural differences in SWB; (4) the beneficial
effects of SWB on health and social relationships; and (5) interventions to increase SWB.
Additionally, we outline the implications of these findings for the helping professions,
organizational psychology, and for researchers. Finally, we describe current developments in
national accounts of well-being, which capture the quality of life in societies beyond economic
indicators and point toward policies that can enhance societal well-being.
Subjective Well-Being
Findings All Psychologists Should Know From
The New Science on Subjective Well-Being
The senior author began studying subjective well-being (SWB) over three decades ago with his
first review of SWB appearing in Psychological Bulletin (Diener, 1984). At that time only a few
publications a year were published on SWB.Today, a Google Scholar search for ‘subjective well-being’
reveals that there are over 140,000 articles that have touched on this topic; in 2015 alone, there were over
14,000 publications that mentioned SWB. The field has become vibrant and has attracted diverse scholars
from psychology, economics, political science, sociology, and anthropology. Advances in the field range
from cross-cultural differences in what causes SWB to developmental trajectories of SWB over the life
course. And the insights of this science of SWB are increasingly being used to understand clinical
phenomena, organizational outcomes, and societal quality of life.
A psychologist recently asked the senior author, “Who cares about life satisfaction? Why does it
matter?” This article is meant to answer these questions by reviewing key findings about life satisfaction
and other forms of SWB, and by elucidating the implications for practice in various fields. We focus on
recent findings that have broad implications for scholars and researchers, as well as for practitioners,
including clinical, counseling, and organizational psychologists.
Defining and Assessing Subjective Well-Being
SWB is defined as people’s overall evaluations of their lives and their emotional experiences.
SWB thus includes broad appraisals, such as life satisfaction and health satisfaction judgments, and
specific feelings that reflect how people are reacting to the events and circumstances in their lives. Indeed,
it has become abundantly clear over the last few decades that SWB is not a single unitary entity. Yet,
there has been some confusion about terminology. Happiness is a loose term with many meanings and so
is often avoided in the scientific literature. SWB, on the other hand, is a broad umbrella term that refers to
all different forms of evaluating one’s life or emotional experience, such as satisfaction, positive affect
(PA), and low negative affect (NA) (see Diener, Oishi, & Lucas, 2016).
Subjective Well-Being
The facets of SWB are separable in factor analyses and have distinctive associations with other
variables. Thus, they should be assessed individually. Life satisfaction, for example, can be assessed with
self-report measures such as the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin,
1985) or with even single-item measures (e.g., Cantril, 1965). PA includes the person’s desirable or
pleasant emotions, such as enjoyment, gratitude, and contentment; PA can be assessed with self-report
scales such as the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark, and Tellegen, 1988) or
the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE; Diener, Wirtz et al., 2010). These same scales
also assess NA, such as anger, sadness, and worry.
Extensive research validates the above scales of SWB (e.g., Diener, Inglehart, & Tay, 2013). The
scales correlate with other measures assessing the same concept, predict future behavior such as suicide,
and correlate with non-self-report measures of well-being such as those based on informant reports or
behavior. These measures of SWB also predict other closely related constructs, such as social support and
meaning in life that, strictly speaking, are not considered aspects of SWB (e.g., Su, Tay, and Diener,
2014). Furthermore, researchers have begun to elucidate the processes involved in responding to the
scales of SWB, as well as the biases that can affect scores on the SWB scales (see Diener et al., 2016).
Not only are the facets of SWB found to be separable when the measures are factor-analyzed, but
they are also separable in terms of what influences them, and what they, in turn, influence. For example,
positive emotions seem to be influenced by social relationships (Tay & Diener, 2011), and in turn they
seem to raise sociability (Berry & Hansen, 1996). In contrast, negative emotions seem most related to
internal and social conflicts (Stoeva, Chiu, & Greenhaus, 2002) and the perception of problems (Watson,
1998). Life satisfaction seems to be heavily influenced by factors that are chronically accessible in
systematically evaluating one’s life (Schimmack & Ulrich, 2005), such as health, income, and the quality
of one’s work. As compared to feelings, life satisfaction is more closely related to income at both the
individual and nation levels (Diener, Tay, & Oishi, 2013; Kahneman & Deaton, 2010). These findings
indicate that we cannot obtain a full assessment of SWB by simply measuring one facet of this larger
construct; several components must be measured to provide a rounded account of SWB.
Subjective Well-Being
Implications for Clinical and Counseling Psychologists
Defining and conceptualizing SWB as multidimensional has important implications for clinical
and counseling psychologists. Increasingly, individuals are pursuing therapy with the goal of living a
more complete, fulfilling, or satisfying life (Lent, 2004) and understanding the structure of SWB can help
practitioners assist patients in achieving these goals. Clinicians can benefit from a nuanced assessment of
the cognitive and affective facets of SWB, with their distinct causes and consequences, and can
seamlessly move into evidence-based interventions designed to affect one or more of these dimensions as
is relevant to an individual’s goals.
Understanding the multidimensionality of SWB and utilizing the brief, freely accessible,
validated SWB measures we have presented here as a complement to common clinical assessment
measures can also aid in the identification and treatment of a range of psychological disorders.
Depression, for example, entails both the presence of NA and lack of PA, yet existing depression
assessments focus on NA. Differentiating aspects of SWB can also help to distinguish between
psychological disorders. For example, depression and anxiety disorders both feature NA, yet are
differentiated in terms of PA, with a deficit in PA more characteristic of depression than most anxiety
disorders (Stanton & Watson, 2014). Understanding the multidimensionality of SWB can thus provide
insight into effective paths to treatment, perhaps leading to improvements in patient outcomes.
Implications for Organizational Psychologists
The field of organizational psychology has traditionally been interested in SWB. The idea that
SWB is non-unitary and requires different assessments in this field has been recognized. SWB is
conceptualized in domain-specific ways (e.g., job satisfaction rather than life satisfaction) and/or broken
down into more discrete states (e.g., stress/anxiety rather than NA). Two perspectives have made
contributions to organizational scholarship on SWB. First, the realm of job attitudes emphasizes cognitive
and affective components (Hulin & Judge, 2003) by assessing job satisfaction and feelings toward one’s
job, respectively. Job attitudes are useful evaluative indicators of work experience and the quality of the
work environment (Freeman, 1978; Herzberg, 1966). Second, occupational stress research focuses on,
Subjective Well-Being
negative aspects of affective SWB such as stress and anxiety (e.g., Karasek, 1979). This research
stemmed from a desire to reduce ailments and mistreatments in the workplace.
Moving beyond these early workplace research perspectives, contemporary perspectives within
organizational science highlight the centrality of the worker and his or her experiences in addition to
organizational goals and needs (Weiss & Rupp, 2011). This led to incorporating non-work SWB in
assessments of employee well-being. As a result, life satisfaction of workers is recognized as an important
work factor, both influencing and being influenced by the work experience (Erdogan, Bauer, Truxillo, &
Mansfield, 2012). Similarly, research on non-work domains such as leisure satisfaction (Kuykendall, Tay,
& Ng, 2015) and relationship satisfaction (Cho & Tay, 2015) has increasingly been brought to the fore.
These developments have further been fostered by recognition of the permeability of work and non-work
domains. Organizational psychologists have also begun to study daily feelings that spill over into and
extend beyond work (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996), with an added inclusion of more positive feelings.
Organizations now recognize that worker SWB needs to be holistically assessed using multiple
indicators. There is attention placed on ameliorating stress in workers as high negativity leads to health
problems in the long run. There is also a desire to keep workers satisfied with their work in order to
enhance job performance. This has led to increasing the level of autonomy given to workers and
implementing job rotations to provide continued interest and engagement at work. Moreover, businesses
are now trying to accommodate more flexible work plans in order to enhance the satisfaction of talented
people in non-work life domains such as family and leisure. Thus, the goal of improving worker SWB has
already led to many changes in the workplace. Future research revealing additional predictors and
outcomes of different types of SWB will contribute to a better workplace.
Implications for Research Psychologists
Because research has established separable facets of SWB, we advise scholars looking at the
causes and consequences of well-being to take a nuanced approach to conceptualizing and assessing each
SWB component. Currently, research studies may focus on only one or two facets of SWB, yet authors
often discuss SWB in general terms.
Subjective Well-Being
Additionally, to reliably assess the causes and consequences of each aspect of SWB, we
recommend the use of large samples and diverse measures. With small samples, any observed differences
could be due to chance and require replication; findings based on small samples, therefore, should be
interpreted with caution. Currently, the number of studies with large representative samples is growing,
and we are beginning to uncover what reliably leads to life satisfaction versus positive or negative
feelings. However, a substantial amount of work still needs to be done to ensure reproducibility and to
confirm that results are not due to the use of specific measures; and more work needs to be conducted on
narrower aspects of SWB (e.g., job satisfaction, joy, contentment). Furthermore, we recommend that
researchers utilize statistical methods where multiple aspects of SWB are assessed in order to parse SWB
into common, unique, and error variance (e.g., bifactor models). This enables us to more cleanly delineate
aspects of SWB (e.g., different domain satisfactions vs. global SWB) and their relation to specific
causes/outcomes. Although there are instances where one component of SWB has been found to correlate
with other variables more strongly than another component of SWB, the sample sizes and analyses are
usually not adequate to fully confirm the conclusions. In short, despite the significant progress in the
measurement of SWB in the past several decades, more research with sound statistical methodology is
necessary to fully elucidate the structure, causes, and consequences of SWB.
Subjective Well-Being Is Influenced by Situations and Circumstances
After an initial focus in the field on the demographic predictors of SWB came an emphasis on
genes, temperament, and personality as major causes—and perhaps the only long-term causes—of SWB.
The claim that people adapt to conditions, both bad and good, over time (Brickman & Campbell, 1971;
Brickman, Coates, & Janoff-Bulman, 1978) became a widespread belief. The authors suggested that we
are on a running wheel, charging ahead to get happier, but with no actual progress. Next came the claim
that levels of long-term SWB can be explained entirely by genes (Lykken & Tellegen, 1996).
However, recent evidence on genetic heritability has produced somewhat lower heritability
estimates than were initially suggested. In a meta-analysis of 13 studies, Nes and Roysamb (2015) found
an average heritability of .40, and much variability between studies. It is worthwhile to note that this
Subjective Well-Being
indicates that 40% of variability in SWB is accounted by genes but there is still the remaining 60% that is
not. Importantly, heritability figures do not directly point to how much a trait can be altered by individual
choices or the environment (Roysamb, Nes, & Vitterso, 2014). Heritability is not a fixed constant; rather,
it is influenced by the amount of variability in the environment. In homogeneous environments
heritabilities are likely to be higher compared to societies where the environment varies more across
individuals. Furthermore, even factors that are highly heritable, such as height or hair color, can be
influenced by environmental factors, such as diet or hair-coloring. Similarly, heritability estimates do not
indicate that circumstances will not influence SWB.
Recent findings on adaptation provide further evidence against the idea that circumstances do not
matter for SWB. We now know that events do influence people’s SWB, and despite adaptation in some
cases these changes are often permanent or last for many years (Lucas, 2007). In long-term longitudinal
studies, for example, a significant proportion of respondents show changes in their levels of SWB over
time (Fujita & Diener, 2005). In a meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies, Luhmann and
colleagues (2012) found that changes in circumstances, including marriage and unemployment, continued
to influence both life satisfaction and affective well-being long after they occurred. Similarly, Anusic,
Yap, and Lucas (2014) found that people did not always fully adapt to events, such as unemployment and
disability. Furthermore, some studies show “scarring,” in which an unfortunate event continues to affect
SWB even after it is remedied. Even after reemployment, for example, previously unemployed people do
not always return to their pre-unemployment levels of SWB (Clark, Georgellis, & Sanfey, 2001).
Evidence showing large societal differences in SWB also point to the importance of
circumstances for SWB (Helliwell, Huang, & Wang, 2016). In some cases, the differences in SWB
between societiesZimbabwe versus Denmark or Togo versus Canadacan cover almost half of the
total range of the scale. Inborn temperament seems an unlikely explanation for these huge national
differences in SWB. Indeed, these nation-level differences are in part explained by factors such as
income, the rule of law, and income inequality rather than temperament or heritability (Diener, Diener, &
Diener, 1995; Oishi, Kesebir, & Diener, 2011).
Subjective Well-Being
In sum, research increasingly shows that SWB is malleable at both the individual and societal
level (Tay & Kuykendall, 2011). Thus, it has become abundantly clear that circumstances and the choices
people make in life can, and do, influence their long-term SWB. We are no longer stuck with the fatalistic
idea that nothing can be done to improve human SWB.
Implications for Clinical and Counseling Psychologists
The notion of SWB as a product of both innate factors and modifiable cognitions and behaviors is
consistent with the biopsychosocial model (George, 1980) commonly recognized by clinical and
counseling psychologists. The growing appreciation of individual circumstances, cognitions, and
behaviors as important determinants of SWB suggests that clinical and counseling psychology can be
influential in the promotion of SWB. The tools of cognitive behavioral therapy, such as identifying
maladaptive thoughts and behaviors, and working with patients or clients to establish alternative ones, can
be directly applied to the improvement of SWB.
As one example, consider the importance of social relationships to the experience of positive
emotions (Tay & Diener, 2011). Techniques developed for use in therapeutic contexts, such as social
skills training, offer the potential to learn new behaviors that will, via the enhancement of social
relationships, also positively influence an individual’s SWB. Importantly, the goal of such clinical
techniques (i.e., cognitive restructuring) is not to develop a naïvely positive or rosy view of the world, but
to facilitate a realistic and balanced perspective in accord with a patient’s desire for greater SWB and
personal growth. In short, the recognition by clinicians that cognitive, affective and behavioral patterns
are malleable dovetails with emerging research in SWB and suggests techniques for improving SWB.
Implications for Organizational Psychologists
Situational influences also have a significant bearing on work-related SWB. The estimated
contribution of genetic factors to job satisfaction is .30 (Arvey, Bouchard, Segal, & Abraham, 1989)
lower than the heritability factors of life satisfaction. This suggests that the type of work and the work
environment may be particularly important for SWB at work.
Subjective Well-Being
Compensation is one situational factor that influences job satisfaction. The relation between
salary and job satisfaction, however, is small (meta-analytic r = .15; Judge, Piccolo, Podsakoff, Shaw, &
Rich, 2010), even when compared to the relatively small influence of income on general life satisfaction
(Howell & Howell, 2008). This finding highlights the role of other aspects of work in job-related SWB.
Indeed, job characteristics that fulfill psychological needs such as meaning, autonomy, and a sense of
competence (Hackman & Oldham, 1976) are substantially associated with job satisfaction. Moreover,
active crafting of work to fit workersneeds, as well as their abilities and preferences, also produces
higher levels of job satisfaction (Tims, Bakker, & Derks, 2013; Wrzeniewski & Dutton, 2001). Finally,
flexibility at work to accommodate other non-work demands (e.g., marriage and children) also
significantly predicts greater job satisfaction (Scandura & Lankau, 1997).
The work context is also critical for fostering greater SWB. On the negative end, a climate of
sexual harassment or ongoing stress lowers job satisfaction and increases work withdrawal and burnout
(Fitzgerald, Drasgow, Hulin, Gelfand, & Magley, 1997; Schaefer & Moos, 1998). On the positive end,
worker perceptions of a positive work climate promote higher job satisfaction (Parker et al., 2003). Such
climates can be fostered through leadership and organizational policies. Supervisor interactions and
supportiveness are key predictors of positive job attitudes. Indeed, unsupportive leaders create greater
distress, work-family conflict, and job dissatisfaction among supervisees (Mathieu, Neumann, Hare, &
Babiak, 2014). Similarly, organizational policies that attend to the needs of employeessuch as the
provision of flexible schedules and dependent services for workers with dependentslower depression
and job dissatisfaction among employees (Thomas & Ganster, 1995).
National economic factors can also influence job satisfaction among workers. Beyond job
optimism and national wealth, lower national unemployment rates predict higher job satisfaction across
136 nations (Tay & Harter, 2013). Across Europe, nations with higher wage levels (and wage-to-effort
ratios) have higher levels of job satisfaction (Pichler & Wallace, 2009; Sousa-Poza & Sousa-Poza, 2000).
In conclusion, there is now evidence linking worker SWB to controllable organizational and
economic factors. Organizations can enhance job benefits/flexibility, promote positive leadership
Subjective Well-Being
practices, and cultivate an inclusive work climate to enhance SWB. National economic policies that focus
on job creation will impinge on national worker SWB as well.
Implications for Research Psychologists
An important goal for future research investigating the effects of circumstances on SWB is to
determine when people adapt to their circumstances. Although Luhmann, Lucas, Eid, and Diener (2013)
found evidence for adaptation to some conditions but much less to others, we still understand little of
when or why these patterns occur. For example, the processes underlying scarringwhen an event
continues to affect SWB even after the unfortunate event is remediedare barely understood. Notably,
many of the factors that influence SWB in the long term have a negative effect, including unemployment
and severe disability (Diener, Lucas, & Scollon, 2006). This has sparked research to determine the factors
that increase SWB that are similarly robust to adaptation (Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, & Schkade, 2005).
Thus, fully understanding adaptation to conditions remains a large area of open scholarship.
Evidence from large cross-national studies suggests that chronic, macro-environments such as
corruption, climate, and progressive taxation play a substantial role in predicting individuals’ SWB
(Oishi, 2012; Tay, Herian, & Diener, 2014). But some research psychologists have also focused on the
effect of immediate situational factors, such as weather and moods at the time of SWB judgments
(Schwarz & Clore, 1983), the effect of a preceding question (Strack, Martin, & Schwarz, 1988), and an
arbitrary life event (Schwarz, Strack, Kommer, & Wagner, 1987). To our knowledge, however, very few
studies have simultaneously examined the effects of macro- and micro-environments on SWB outcomes.
Exploring the relative importance of macro- versus micro-environments and their interactive effects,
therefore, promises to be a fruitful area for future research.
Culture and Subjective Well-Being
In the past decade, we have learned a lot about the interplay between culture and SWB (see Oishi
& Gilbert, 2016; Uchida & Oishi, 2016 for reviews). In particular, psychologists have focused on three
main sets of questions: 1)Is SWB composed of the same or of different components across cultures, and if
Subjective Well-Being
these differ, are there universals? 2)Do the causes of SWB differ across cultures, and if so, are there any
universal causes? 3)Are there mean level differences between cultures, and if so, what produces these?
Culture and Concepts of Well-Being
In order for cross-cultural comparisons to be meaningful, it is important to establish the
equivalence of SWB. Wierzbicka (2004) demonstrated that the threshold for being “happy” in English is
much lower than other languages, such as French (heureux) and German (glücklick). English speakers can
use “happy” to say, for instance, “I am happy here reading,” whereas French or German speakers would
not use “heureux” or “glücklick” in such a trivial context. Wierzbicka argued that English speakers are
more likely to report having felt happy than French or Germans in part because the English term “happy”
can be used more widely than the French or German term. Although this critique is logical and well taken,
large international surveys often find that English speakers (e.g., Americans, Australians) also report
being more satisfied with their lives than French and German. The key here is that the life satisfaction
item does not use the controversial term “happy”, suggesting that these differences are less likely to be
explained by differences between languages (see Diener, 2000).
Still, Wierzbicka’s critique raises an important methodological issue in cross-cultural research,
and has inspired recent studies on the concepts of happiness across cultures and times. For example,
Oishi, Graham, Kesebir, and Galinha (2013) conducted a dictionary analysis in 30 nations and found that
in many languages (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Turkish, Russian, and Norwegian), the primary definition of
happiness was “good luck and fortune,” whereas in American English this definition was denoted
“archaic” in 1961. According to a content analysis of the State of the Union addresses by the same group
of researchers, U.S. presidents used the terms happy and happiness when referring to favorable conditions
until around 1920, but after that they stopped using happy and happiness as good luck and fortune. In the
same research, a Google Ngram analysis also showed that the term “happy nation” was more frequently
used in books from 1800 till around 1920 than the term “happy person,” but after that “happy person” was
used far more frequently than “happy nation.” Likewise, American concepts of happiness are
predominantly positive, whereas some people outside North America (e.g., Iranians, Indonesians,
Subjective Well-Being
Japanese) worry that too much happiness can bring some negative consequences (Joshanloo et al., 2014;
Uchida & Kitayama, 2009). Such cultural perspectives on happiness are consistent with understanding
happiness to mean good luck and fortune, which, by the very definition of “luck”, suggests that a series of
lucky (happy) events are likely to be followed by unlucky events. These findings demonstrate that the
concept of happiness differs across cultures and historical periods.
Culture and the Composition of Subjective Well-Being
In addition to the concept of happiness, research suggests that the components of SWB vary
somewhat across cultures. Low-arousal positive emotions (e.g., contentment), for example, are more
valued in Pacific Rim cultures such as Japan (Tsai, Louis, Chen, & Uchida, 2007), whereas high-arousal
positive emotions (e.g., excitement) are more valued in Western cultures, such as the U.S. Relatedly, PA
and NA are more inversely correlated in the West than the Pacific Rim, especially among women
(Schimmack, Oishi, & Diener, 2002). Beyond general PA and NA, research has also revealed cross-
cultural differences in the role that specific emotions play in SWB. Pride, for example, is a greater
component of SWB for the Maasai than for the Amish or Inuit (Biswas-Diener, Vitterso, & Diener,
2005). Similarly, pride is strongly associated with other positive emotions in the U.S., but not in Japan
(Kitayama, Mesquita, & Karasawa, 2006) or India (Scollon, Diener, Oishi, & Biswas-Diener, 2004).
Despite these cultural differences, there is also evidence for cross-cultural universality in the structure of
SWB. Scollon et al. (2004), for example, found coherent clusters of PA and NA across cultures, even
when considering emotions that were unique to a particular indigenous culture. Thus, research has
uncovered both similarities and differences across cultures in the way PA and NA are structured.
The cognitive content of life satisfaction evaluations also seems to differ somewhat across
cultures. For example, Biswas-Diener and Diener (2001) found that the item “If I could live my life over,
I would change almost nothing” did not cohere with the other four items of the Satisfaction with Life
Scale in some cultures (e.g., the slums of Calcutta) as well as it does in Western cultures (see also
Vitterso, Biswas-Diener, & Diener, 2005). However, some universality is indicated by the fact that the
other four items do seem to cohere strongly in most cultures. In sum, there seem to be both universals and
Subjective Well-Being
cultural differences in responses to life satisfaction questions as well as in the feelings that are
experienced as pleasant or unpleasant in each culture.
Culture and the Causes of Subjective Well-Being
Although there are many interesting cross-cultural differences in the factors that predict life
satisfaction, there are also many similarities. Extraversion, for instance, is associated with the frequency
of PA in most cultures (Schimmack, Radhakrishnan, Oishi, Dzokoto, & Ahadi, 2002). Furthermore,
satisfaction of autonomy, relatedness, and competence needs is positively associated with life satisfaction
across diverse cultures (e.g., Church et al., 2013). Similarly, the fulfillment of the basic needs featured in
Maslow’s needs theory predicts higher life satisfaction across 123 countries (Tay & Diener, 2011).
Finally, income and social support were shown to predict life satisfaction among various groups in
Nicaragua, including sex workers, dump dwellers, and the urban and rural poor (Cox, 2012).
Despite the universal predictors, there are also interesting differences in the predictors of SWB
across cultures. For instance, self-consistency across situations is more important for SWB in
individualistic than in collectivistic cultures (Suh, 2002). Researchers have also found that self-esteem is a
stronger predictor of life satisfaction in individualist nations than in collectivist nations (Diener & Diener,
1995). Furthermore, affect balanceexperiencing more pleasant than unpleasant emotionsis strongly
associated with life satisfaction in individualist nations but not in collectivist nations (Suh, Diener, Oishi,
& Triandis, 1998). In contrast, relationship harmony and norms are stronger predictors of life satisfaction
among collectivist nations (e.g., Kwan, Bond, & Singelis, 1997; Suh et al., 1998). Finally, Curhan et al.
(2014) found that objective social status (e.g., education level) predicted life satisfaction more strongly
among Japanese than among Americans, whereas subjective social status predicted life satisfaction more
strongly among Americans than among Japanese.
Researchers have begun to elucidate some of the factors that underlie the above cultural
differences. For example, the U.S.–Japan differences in how much self-esteem predicts life satisfaction
can be explained by differences in relational mobility (how easy it is to join new groups and leave old
groups; Yuki, Sato, Takemura, & Oishi, 2013). A more general factor that could explain many of the
Subjective Well-Being
cultural differences in SWB is cultural congruencethe extent to which individuals fit in with the
dominant culture. For instance, religious persons are happier in religious nations than non-religious
nations (and vice versa, Diener, Tay, & Myers, 2011), and promotion-oriented individuals are happier in
promotion-oriented nations than prevention-oriented nations (Fulmer et al., 2010). Similarly, extraverts
are even happier if the culture as a whole is more extraverted (Fulmer et al., 2010).
Mean Level Differences in Subjective Well-Being Across Cultures
Mean level differences are evident between cultural groups, U.S. states, and societies (e.g.,
Diener & Tay, 2015; Rentfrow, Mellander, & Florida, 2009). The Maasai, Inuit, and Amish, for example,
differ in overall life satisfaction and in satisfaction with specific domains in their lives (e.g., health,
income), with the Maasai being the most satisfied across most domains (Biswas-Diener et al., 2005).
Interestingly, cross-cultural mean differences in SWB can sometimes trump more immediate determinants
of SWB. The homeless in the U.S. report lower life satisfaction than the homeless in India, even though
the homeless in India have a harder time obtaining basic material needs (Biswas-Diener & Diener, 2006).
Mean-level differences between cultures in SWB need to be interpreted within the broader
evidence of the predictors of the differences between nations. Income and wealth are prominent
determinants of the variations in life satisfaction across nations (e.g., Diener, Kahneman, Tov, & Arora,
2010), but there are also other predictors, such as progressive taxation (Oishi, Schimmack, & Diener,
2012) and welfare spending (Flavin, Pacek, & Radcliff, 2011). Levels of social capital such as low
corruption are also predictors of life satisfaction across nations over time and even controlling for income
(Helliwell, Barrington-Leigh, Harris, & Huang, 2009; Tay, Herian, & Diener, 2014). Helliwell and
colleagues conclude that the similarity in predictors of life satisfaction across nations suggests that mean
level differences between nations are not due to differing conceptions of the good life (see however Oishi
et al. 2013 for cultural differences in the concept of “happiness”). This suggests that much of the
differences in SWB across cultures may be due to differences in the circumstances between countries.
Implications for Clinical and Counseling Psychologists
Subjective Well-Being
Applying emerging knowledge from the study of culture within the science of SWB holds the
potential to inform research and practice in clinical and counseling psychology, both of which have a
longstanding interest in understanding and providing care to diverse populations. The knowledge that
individuals from different cultures might pursue SWB in different ways can be utilized by practitioners to
avoid a one-size-fits-all treatment approach. Thus, recognizing that people from different cultures value
different positive emotions (e.g., contentment vs. excitement) highlights the need for practitioners to
discuss their clients’ expectations and goals, and then tailor therapy accordingly. Indeed, cross-cultural
evidence has called into question even basic assumptions about client SWB that practitioners may take for
granted. Although people in the U.S. view positive emotions as generally desirable, for example, other
cultures are more cautious about pursuing positive emotions because such emotions might bring
resentment from others or be followed by negative feelings (Joshanloo et al., 2014).
The understanding that some causes of SWB are potentially “universal” while others may be
more effective in specific cultural contexts can be used to shape a successful and individual therapeutic
plan. For example, while the attainment of basic psychological needs is likely to promote healthy
psychological functioning for individuals in a wide range of cultural contexts (Church et al., 2013), other
characteristics, such as self-esteem, may promote SWB more in some cultures than others (Yuki et al.,
2013). The concept of personculture fit may also be useful to clinicians. Insofar as an individual’s
cognitions or beliefs differ substantially from those prevalent around them, a person may experience
diminished SWB (Fulmer et al, 2010). By exploring ways to promote better personculture fit or to help
clients adjust to a lack of fit, therapists can help to remove such barriers to SWB.
Techniques to enhance SWB may also vary in their effectiveness depending on one’s cultural
context. In one study, a gratitude intervention was more effective among U.S. participants than among
South Koreans, while performing kind acts was effective across cultures (Layous, Lee, Choi, &
Lyubomirsky, 2013; Nelson et al., 2015). Although research is needed to gain a complete understanding
of how and why interventions differ in effectiveness across cultures, practitioners can benefit from this
growing knowledge to inform their treatment approaches.
Subjective Well-Being
Implications for Organizational Psychologists
In this section, we seek to discuss culture at a broad level while recognizing that in organizational
research and applications, the issue of cultural differences in SWB has added layers of complexity
because of the inherent multilevel nature of work within different cultures. This comprises subcultures
within occupations, teams, and organizations apart from national culture. For example, expatriates’ SWB
depend not only on the similarity to the national culture, but also the extent to which expatriates feel that
their families are adjusting to the new culture or the amount of foreign subsidiary support for expatriates
(Chen, et al., 2010; Takeuchi, 2010).
Regarding the structure of SWB, research has revealed a strong degree of cross-cultural
equivalence in the structure of worker SWB in both work affect (Levine et al., 2011) and job satisfaction
(Candell & Hulin, 1986). At the same time, nations with more similar cultures tend to have a greater
degree of equivalence in job satisfaction assessments (Liu, Borg, & Spector, 2004). Therefore, SWB
constructs in the work context are comparable across nations with some small degree of cultural
idiosyncrasies. This implies that worker SWB can be compared across nations and across workers in
different locations within multinational firms.
There are common predictors of worker SWB but these factors appear to be moderated by
culture. Research has shown that the fulfillment of fundamental basic needs predicts SWB across the
world (Tay & Diener, 2011), and this is borne out in the workplace context. The fulfillment of basic needs
such as autonomy, relatedness, and competence is also found to predict lower job anxiety and higher job
engagement both in an American firm and in Bulgaria (Deci et al., 2001). Yet, culture can moderate the
importance placed on different aspects of need fulfillment; certain needs like autonomy and achievement
appear to be more salient in individualistic cultures. Autonomy at work buffers the negative effects of
over-qualification only in individualist cultures but not in collectivist cultures (Wu, Luksyte, & Parker,
2015). Moreover, job levelhow high up an employee is within an organization—is related to job
satisfaction only in individualist countries but not in collectivist countries (Huang & Van de Vliert, 2004).
By contrast, collectivistic nations place more emphasis on relational need fulfillment. Specifically, a
Subjective Well-Being
meta-analysis has shown that relationship fit between colleagues and supervisor is emphasized more in
collectivist cultures as compared to individualist cultures (Oh et al., 2014). Similarly, agreeableness is
more predictive of job satisfaction in collectivistic Asian societies as compared to individualistic ones
because harmonious relations are more valued in such cultures (Templer, 2012).
To conclude, levels of worker SWB can be compared across nations. However, we also need to
be sensitive to the idea that there are potential “subcultures” because workers are also nested in team and
organizational contexts that have their own cultures. These may interact with national cultures in ways
that require further investigation. The cultural context can uniquely influence the extent workers value
some aspects of the job more than others, which in turn affect their SWB. Organizations need to provide
culturally relevant rewards to workers in order to maximize worker motivation and satisfaction.
Implications for Research Psychologists
While the past decade has provided more information about the intersection between culture and
SWB, there are several issues that require further research. First, the origins of cultural variations in
predictors and concepts of happiness need to be explored more rigorously, using methods beyond simple
cross-sectional correlations, including longitudinal, experimental, and experience sampling methods. This
is because most research has focused on cross-national mean level differences; however, there is not a lot
of information on how culture influences cognitive and affective processes underlying SWB over time.
Second, we need to learn more about how the components of SWB vary across cultures, and
whether there are, nevertheless, any universals. In order to achieve this, more sophisticated measurement
equivalence methodologies research needs to be applied to assess the equivalence of SWB measures
across multiple nations as opposed to longstanding between-group approaches (Tay, Diener, Drasgow, &
Vermunt, 2011). Third, outcomes and optimal levels of SWB (e.g., health, academic success, career
success) have rarely been examined across cultures (see Koo & Suh, 2012 for an exception), making this
a wide-open area for future research.
Beneficial Outcomes of SWB
Subjective Well-Being
For decades researchers studied SWB as an outcome, focusing on identifying causal predictors of
this experience. However, researchers have shown a growing interest in exploring the downstream
consequences of SWB on other outcomes. What are the outcomes of high SWB; does it affect people’s
health and behavior? Evidence now suggests that high SWB leads to a number of beneficial outcomes,
including health and longevity, supportive social relationships, work productivity, and citizenship (for
reviews, see DeNeve, Diener, Tay, and Xuereb, 2013; Diener, Kanazawa, Suh, & Oishi, 2015;
Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005). There are caveats that we will mention, but the research overall
suggests that SWB does not merely correlate with such beneficial outcomes, it also causes them.
Health and Longevity
One important benefit of SWB is better health and greater longevity. Happier individuals suffer
less from certain infirmities and live longer on average (Diener & Chan, 2011; Lyubomirsky, King, &
Diener, 2005). In longitudinal studies that have examined groups such as nuns (Danner, Friesen, &
Snowdon, 2001) and psychologists (Pressman & Cohen, 2012), individuals with higher SWB have been
found to live longer. Similar evidence has been found in larger and more representative samples (see
Diener & Chan, 2011). The human evidence has been replicated in apes, with happier orangutans living
longer than their less happy counterparts (Weiss, Adams, & King, 2011). Although sometimes the
predictive effect of SWB on longevity disappears when Time 1 health is controlled (e.g., Liu et al., 2015),
Time 1 health is usually assessed somewhere in middle or old age when SWB is likely already to have a
large effect on health. Thus, such controls can inadvertently control away the effects of SWB.
Chida and Steptoe (2008) conducted meta-analyses of 26 prospective studies on initially healthy
participants and of an additional 28 studies on people with established diseases such as HIV/AIDS. The
follow-up periods of these studies ranged from 1 to 44 years. SWB was associated with reduced mortality
in both sets of studies, though the effects were stronger in studies with healthy participants. Importantly,
effects for PA persisted when NA was controlled, suggesting that positive components of SWBrather
than the absence of negativepartially explain these beneficial effects on health.
Subjective Well-Being
One reason that SWB improves health and longevity is that people higher in SWB are more likely
to enact healthy behaviors such as exercising, not smoking, and wearing seat belts (for a review see
Diener, Kanazawa et al., 2015). Research has also revealed the role of physiological mechanisms, with
individuals with higher SWB having stronger immune and cardiovascular systems (Pressman & Cohen,
2005). Indeed, evidence suggests that positive moodsversus neutral or negative moodspredict better
physiological parameters, such as cortisol, blood pressure, and immune system parameters (e.g., Barak,
2006; James, Yee, Harshfield, Blank, & Pickering, 1986; Schnall et al., 1990). In a recent review,
researchers found evidence for these, as well as other mechanisms that mediate the path from SWB to
health, including, health behaviors, cortisol profiles, cardiovascular health, inflammatory processes, and
sleep disturbances (Steptoe, Dockray, & Wardle, 2009). These changes toward healthier physiological
responses with higher SWB help explain its influence on health and longevity.
Experimental evidence provides even more direct evidence for the causal effect of SWB on
health. When people are put into a good mood after a stressful experience, their cardiovascular system
returns to baseline more quickly (Fredrickson & Levenson, 1998). Similarly, experimentally induced
positive moods show benefits for some aspects of the immune system (Marsland, Pressman, & Cohen,
2007). Furthermore, stress-reduction techniques in experimental intervention studies tend to improve
immune parameters (Kiecolt-Glaser & Glaser, 1992; Stowell, McGuire, Robles, Glaser, & Kiecolt-Glaser,
2003), as does mindfulness meditation (Davidson et al., 2003). In sum, although more research is
necessary, converging evidence suggests that SWB often has a beneficial effect on health and longevity.
Social Relationships
There is substantial evidence that social relationships are a major cause of SWB (Diener &
Seligman, 2002), but high SWB also improves social relationships. Married individuals, for example, are
on average happier than single or divorced individuals. Although getting married has been shown to
increase SWB, individuals who get married tend to have higher SWB many years before the marriage,
even before meeting their future partner (Luhmann et al., 2013). This finding suggests that SWB can lead
to marriage, not just the other way around. Berry and Hansen (1996) found that trait PA predicted better
Subjective Well-Being
social interactions in both laboratory and naturalistic settings. Experimental studies further show that
positive moods lead people to feel more sociable (e.g., Cunningham, 1988) and interested in social
activities (Whelan & Zelenski, 2012).
Individuals high in SWB are also more prosocial in their behavior. In experimental studies,
people put in a positive mood are more cooperative and reach superior solutions in negotiation situations
(e.g., Carnevale & Isen, 1986; Lawler, et al., 2000; Lount, 2010). Furthermore, higher SWB is associated
with superior organizational citizenship (for a review see Tenney, Poole, & Diener 2016), bigger
donations to charities (Okten, Osili, & Ozer, in prep), volunteering more (Oishi, Diener, & Lucas, 2007),
and more frequent blood donations (Priller & Schupp, 2011).
Evolutionary Benefits
Because SWB increases the likelihood of beneficial outcomes, Diener, Kanazawa, and colleagues
(2015) argued that being generally high in SWB should have been selected for in the process of evolution.
Indeed, even in difficult circumstances, more than half of the population is likely to be above neutral on
SWB measures (Diener & Diener, 1996). People living in difficult circumstances are, of course, not as
happy as those in more felicitous circumstances, but nonetheless they are above the neutral point in the
slightly positive range of the scales (Biswas-Diener et al., 2005). This happier-than-neutral pattern may be
the result of the natural selection for happier individuals. In other words, happiness may be an
evolutionary adaptation because of its downstream consequences for health, longevity, social
relationships, and even fertility (Diener, Kanazawa et al., 2015).
Although high SWB seems to benefit a number of domains of life, several cautions are in order.
First, more is not always better. Just because high SWB is associated with benefits in some domains does
not mean that increasingly high levels of SWB will always result in gains. Oishi and colleagues (2007)
found that in achievement domains, people high in life satisfaction are more successful than those with
extremely high satisfaction. Pressman and Cohen (2005) further suggested that highly intense and aroused
positive emotions might actually be of potential harm to health. Thus, extremely high SWB might not be
Subjective Well-Being
needed for benefits to arise; frequent but mild positive moods may be sufficient (DeNeve et al., 2013).
Second, negative moods can produce more functional responses than positive moods in some situations
(Gruber, Mauss, & Tamir, 2011). Third, negative moods are normal in some situations, such as when a
loved one dies, and these types of short-term moods might have long-term beneficial rather than
deleterious effects. Finally, benefits of SWB are not always found, raising the issue of when and where
they are likely to occur. Thus, although positive moods and life satisfaction have benefits, people need not
be intensely happy all of the time. Rather, being above neutral most of the time might be most beneficial.
Implications for Clinical and Counseling Psychologists
Helping individuals to effect positive change in their lives is a central interest for clinical and
counseling psychologists. While a sense of satisfaction with one’s life, greater meaning and fulfillment,
and the experience of positive feelings are each rewarding and worth pursuing, the mounting evidence
that SWB can be causally linked to other important life outcomes suggests that people who seek greater
well-being will benefit in many wayssocially, occupationally, and in terms of greater health
(Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005). These latter findings are particularly relevant to the rapidly
growing field of clinical health psychology, which examines how psychological functioning and
therapeutic techniques impact physical health, by highlighting the relationship between SWB, healthy
behaviors, and adaptive physiological responses (Diener, Kanazawa et al., 2015). The promotion of SWB,
from this perspective, is not only an end-state resulting from the process of therapy, but also a potential
catalyst for greater health and growth in a number of life domains. Therefore, clinical and counseling
psychologists might gain insight from research on the positive consequences of SWB as to how to best
help people achieve improvements in their lives, while also playing a significantly and meaningful role in
actively facilitating such positive change.
Implications for Organizational Psychologists
The extent to which workers are thriving at work can have consequences on other life domains
such as family and leisure time (Ford, Heinen, & Langkamer, 2007; Judge & Watanabe, 1993;
Kuykendall et al., 2015). Evidence, from an occupational stress perspective where negative emotions
Subjective Well-Being
leads to poorer functioning (Karasek, 1979) and the Broaden-and-Build perspective in which positive
emotions promote good outcomes in organizations (Fredrickson, 2000), is mounting to suggest that
worker SWB predicts other positive outcomes. We focus on two broad outcomes that are robustly
associated with higher worker SWB: work outcomes and worker health.
An important question for organizations is whether workers higher in SWB are more productive.
The estimated corrected meta-analytic correlation between job satisfaction and job performance is .30,
which is moderately strong (Judge, Thoreson, Bono, & Patton, 2001). Providing some causal evidence, a
meta-analytic review of cross-lagged relations found that positive job attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction)
predicted job performance, but not the other way around (Riketta, 2008). Job satisfaction is not only
associated with task performance but also lower counterproductive work behavior (e.g., stealing,
gossiping; Mount, Ilies, & Johnson, 2006) and increased organizational citizenship behavior (e.g., helping
co-workers, assisting supervisors when not asked; Williams & Anderson, 1991). Moreover, job
satisfaction also predicts less work withdrawal behaviors (e.g., intent to quit, turnover; Podsakoff, LePine,
& LePine, 2007). This implies that a lack of worker SWB can have real consequences on the bottom-line
for organizations due to lower productivity and greater turnover costs. On the positive flip side, meta-
analyses and large-scale studies have shown that employee SWB predicts greater customer satisfaction,
productivity, and profitability in business units (Harter, Schmidt, Asplund, Killham, & Agrawal, 2010;
Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002), and may even influence stock prices (Edmans, 2011).
Another critical outcome of worker SWB is improved health outcomes (Ganster & Schaubroeck,
1991) and physiological functioning (Kuykendall & Tay, 2015). Within working environments, research
demonstrates that low job satisfaction and high work stress are associated with deleterious effects on
health, including physical and psychological illnesses (Darr & Johns, 2008; Faragher, Cass, & Cooper,
2005). Therefore, greater worker SWB may substantially decrease healthcare and disability costs to
business organizations. Overall, mounting evidence of the impact of worker SWB on organizational
outcomes and worker health requires that organizations pay more attention to promoting SWB.
Implications for Research Psychologists
Subjective Well-Being
Despite recent advances, many research questions regarding the effects of SWB on subsequent
behaviors remain unanswered. Although experimental manipulations of mood already exist, these studies
do not address the effects of long-term changes in SWB on outcomes. Across all outcomes, therefore,
experimental studies are needed in which researchers examine the effects of raising longer-term SWB.
Another important research goal is to explore potential moderators and mediators for SWB outcomes
from health to social relationships. When is SWB most likely to produce beneficial effects? What are the
pathways leading from SWB to better health or social relationships? Do the effects generalize across
cultures, or are they found primarily in cultures that highly value SWB?
Another important area for future research is to separately explore the effects of PA, NA, and life
satisfaction on these outcomes. Although we know that PA predicts health beyond the effects of NA, we
know little about how PA versus NA influences other benefits of SWB, such as social relationships. We
also know little about whether PA and life satisfaction have overlapping or separate effects on outcomes.
Yet another important set of questions concerns the optimal mix of each type of SWB. For instance, there
are some findings that suggest that a touch of NA against a background of PA can heighten creativity in
the workplace (George & Zhou, 2011). Might small amounts of NA be helpful in other domains, at least
when PA predominates? Finally, researchers should examine the optimal level of each type of SWB.
Following the lead of the Oishi and colleagues (2007), for example, researchers need to explore the
optimal levels of SWB for beneficial outcomes beyond achievement. Furthermore, research should
examine whether intense PA can be helpful, or whether primarily frequent but low intensity PA is most
beneficial? Thus, questions about the effects of SWB present many opportunities for researchers.
Interventions to Raise Subjective Well-Being
Researchers have begun to apply the science of SWB in the form of evidence-based interventions
designed to increase SWB. A growing literature has emerged demonstrating how brief experimental
manipulations can increase SWB (Parks & Schueller, 2014; Quoidbach, Mikolajcak, & Gross, 2015).
Some effective manipulations to increase SWB include cultivating gratitude through counting one’s
Subjective Well-Being
blessings (Emmons & McCullough, 2003; Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, & Schkade, 2005; Seligman, Steen,
Park, & Peterson, 2005) or expressing it through writing and sharing a gratitude letter (Boehm,
Lyubomirsky, & Sheldon, 2011; Lyubomirsky, Dickerhoof, Boehm, & Sheldon, 2011; Seligman et al.,
2005). Other activities have also been shown to increase SWB, including performing acts of kindness
(Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, & Schkade, 2005; Sheldon, Boehm, & Lyubomirsky, 2012), visualizing one’s
best possible self in the future (Boehm et al., 2011; King 2001; Layous, Nelson, & Lyubomirsky, 2013),
using one’s character strengths in new ways (Seligman et al., 2005), savoring experiences (Bryant &
Veroff, 2007), spending money on others (Dunn, Aknin, & Norton, 2008), interacting with strangers or
“weak ties” (e.g., classmates; Epley & Schroeder, 2014; Sandstrom & Dunn, 2014a, 2014b), writing
about one’s positive experiences (Burton & King, 2004; Pinquart & Forstmeier, 2012), or sharing these
positive experiences with others (Lambert et al., 2013). Importantly, each of these positive intervention
strategies is brief, self-administered, and cost-effective (Lyubomirsky and Layous, 2013). More resource-
intensive programs designed to increase SWB have also been developed, including Hope Therapy
(Cheavens, Feldman, Gum, Michael, & Snyder, 2006) and Well-Being Therapy (Fava & Tomba, 2009).
Meta-analyses provide further evidence for the effectiveness of SWB interventions. Sin &
Lyubomirsky (2009) examined 51 SWB intervention studies and concluded that these were, indeed,
effective at enhancing SWB, r = .29. Boiler and colleagues (2013) conducted another meta-analysis of
this literature, excluding quasi-experimental studies and employing more conservative criteria including
only studies positioned strictly within the bounds of positive psychology. Even this more rigorous
analysis of 39 intervention studies found similar effects: Positive interventions increased SWB, r = .34.
Given the diverse assortment of positive strategies shown to increase SWB, Lyubomirsky &
Layous (2013) presented a positive-activity model to identify features of activities and people that
constitute effective SWB interventions. First, there are several characteristics of individuals completing
SWB interventions that influence the effectiveness of these programs (Lyubomirsky & Layous, 2013).
Individuals benefit the most from SWB interventions when they are motivated to become happier
(Lyubomirsky et al., 2011), believe that SWB is malleable (Howell, Passmore, & Holder, 2015), put more
Subjective Well-Being
effort in the intervention activities (Layous, Lee et al., 2013; Lyubomirsky et al., 2011), and believe these
efforts will pay off (Layous, Nelson, & Lyubomirsky, 2012). Beyond these individual differences,
demographic characteristics have also been shown to influence the effectiveness of SWB interventions.
Participants who are older (Sin & Lyubomirsky, 2009) and from Western cultures (Boehm et al., 2011)
benefit more from these strategies compared to younger participants and those from Eastern cultures.
Second, a number of features of the interventions themselves have also been identified as
constituents of an effective SWB intervention. Meta-analytic results suggest that SWB interventions of a
longer duration were increasingly more effective (Boiler et al., 2013; Sin & Lyubomirsky, 2009).
However, striking the balance for maximum potency might depend on the activity of interest
(Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, and Schkade, 2005).
Third, variety is also an essential component of effective SWB interventions, functioning to stave
off hedonic adaptation (Sheldon et al., 2012). Building variety within an activity as well as the inclusion
of a number of different activities in a single intervention program can facilitate greater sustained effects
on SWB. In one study of pain, which is reduced by PA, participants were randomly assigned to engage in
zero, two, four, or six positive activities. Regardless of the variety of activities, all participants were
prescribed the same total dosage: Participants completed an activity just as often in the two activities
group as the six activities group, but these activities were more varied in the six activities group and
completed a greater number of times in the two activities group. Compared to participants in the zero-
activity control condition, those who engaged in four or six activities, reported less pain at follow-up time
points up to six months later (Hausmann, Parks, Youk, & Kwoh, 2014). These findings point to a role for
including a variety of activities in intervention programs to cultivate lasting improvements in SWB.
Finally, encouraging habit development and continued practice of SWB activities is an important
factor in sustaining the effects of interventions. In several studies, participants who continued to practice
SWB activities following the intervention experienced greater SWB compared to those who did not
(Lyubomirsky et al., 2011; Seligman et al., 2005; Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2006). Thus, continued
practice enables initial boosts to SWB to last over time.
Subjective Well-Being
Lyubomirsky and Layous (2013) also point to the importance of personactivity fit for successful
SWB interventions. Cross-cultural research, for example, has shown that certain activities are more
beneficial for some people than others. Whereas U.S. participants benefitted from both kindness and
gratitude activities, participants from South Korea did not similarly benefit from a gratitude intervention
as this activity conflicts with their dialectical culture (Layous, Lee et al., 2013). In another study,
participants’ preference for each of six different SWB activities predicted the likelihood of completing
that exercise (Schuller, 2010). In short, a fit between the person and the activity is crucial in facilitating
engagement and sustained effort, and thus maximizing the potential of positive activities to promote
sustainable changes in SWB.
Implications for Clinical and Counseling Psychology
The existing research on interventions that can enhance SWB provide several compelling avenues
through which practitioners can help individuals achieve gains in SWB. Indeed, many of these techniques
are amenable to the therapeutic context and can be readily incorporated into a counseling or treatment
plan. It is worth making a distinction, however, between treatments with the goal of alleviating
problematic symptoms or moderate-to-severe mental illness versus those interventions intended to boost
SWB among non-seriously-ill populations. Most interventions in the area of SWB are of the latter variety,
and while somesuch as positive psychotherapy (PPT)have been successfully implemented in samples
experiencing mild depression (Seligman et al., 2005; Seligman, Rashid, & Parks, 2006), most have not
(Sin & Lyubomirsky, 2009). Currently, practitioners can draw on the existing SWB research to help
patients and clients who are not experiencing serious mental illness or who are pursuing therapy for
reasons of personal growth or greater SWB. Future research is needed to examine whether SWB
interventions can also be applied to treat mental illness.
To establish comprehensive treatments that are ready for use by clinical and counseling
psychologists, additional research is needed that tests the effectiveness of SWB interventions using
randomized clinical trials with community-based, non-student samples. In other words, development of
evidence-based treatments for SWB is paramount. Moreover, demonstrating both short-term and long-
Subjective Well-Being
term effectiveness is critical to render these techniques ready for widespread dissemination. One multi-
site randomized clinical trial testing an evidence-based treatment program for individuals seeking greater
SWB is currently underway (Kushlev, Heintzelman, Lutes, Wirtz, Oishi, & Diener, 2016). This novel
well-being treatment program incorporates a number of small-scale intervention activities into a multi-
construct program, delivered either in-person or online. To evaluate the initial effectiveness of the
program, the authors are examining a range of psychological, biological, and social outcomes across an
initial treatment period (3 months) and follow-up (6 months), with the ultimate goal of determining
whether such an intervention to enhance SWB can produce clinically meaningful change in diverse
Implications for Organizational Psychologists
From an organizational standpoint, there are many potential gains from enhancing the SWB of
workers. There now exists evidence for the effectiveness of several SWB interventions applied
specifically in organizational context. One such type of intervention is loving-kindness meditation, which
involves a meditative contemplation of positive feelings toward oneself, family members, and others
(Salzberg, 1995). In one study of university staff and faculty, a loving-kindness meditation workshop for
six weeks was shown to produce positive effects a week after the end of the workshop (Kok et al., 2013).
Compared to a waitlist control group, the intervention group felt more positive emotions, which in turn
enhanced social connections and predicted a marker of cardiac health (i.e., vagal tone). In addition, a field
study of working adults showed that ongoing practice of loving-kindness meditation continued to enhance
positive emotions across 8 weeks and led to greater life satisfaction compared to a waitlist control
(Fredrickson, Cohn, Coffey, Pek, & Finkel, 2008). Finally, workers who practiced mindfulness
meditation that incorporated loving-kindness meditation showed significantly higher job satisfaction after
10 working days compared to waitlist controls (Hülsheger, Alberts, Feinholdt, & Lang, 2013).
Other types of interventions have also been implemented in organizations. One notable example
is an expressive writing intervention where individuals write about their deepest thoughts and feelings.
Compared to control participants, workers who engaged in an expressive writing exercise over three days
Subjective Well-Being
felt more positive emotions and experienced other positive outcomes (e.g., lowered workplace incivility)
in a two-week follow-up assessment (Kirk, Schutte, & Hine, 2011). Another notable example is an online
intervention program that incorporated 8 weeks of assignments focusing on goal-setting, resource-
building, and happiness. Compared to the control group, the active treatment group showed significant
increases in positive feelings (Ouweneel, Le Blanc, & Schaufeli, 2013).
Many interventions have also focused on alleviating stress and providing stress management
techniques. Meta-analyses of occupational stress-based management interventions show moderate to large
effect sizes in reducing stress (d = .53; Richardson & Rothstein, 2008). An examination of work-place
resilience interventions, including health promotion, positive psychology, and stress-based interventions,
to enhance SWB found a smaller meta-analytic effect size of d = .25 in assessments occurring less than 1
month post-intervention; critically, the effect sizes were non-significant when examined more than one
month post-interventions (Vanhove, Herian, Perez, Harms, & Lester, 2015). Although a follow-up of the
participants from one of the loving-kindness meditation intervention mentioned above showed that the
gains in positive feelings held 15 months later (Cohn & Fredrickson, 2010), most studies in the meta-
analysis did not show such lasting effects (Vanhove et al., 2015).
Overall, because workplace interventions have been generally shown to be effective,
organizations can implement activities and practices that can boost worker SWB. However, given
findings suggesting that these gains are short-lived, organizations need to create ways for workers to
continue such interventions to reap the most benefits. The work time allocated to these interventions may
be worthwhile in the long run as workers with higher SWB will likely be healthier and more productive.
Implications for Research Psychologists
Existing intervention studies have provided insight into a number of important questions for the
basic science of SWB. For example, evidence on SWB interventions suggests that a substantial portion of
SWB is due to intentional activities, thoughts, and behaviors. (Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, & Schkade, 2005).
Importantly, unlike genetic predispositions and life circumstances, behavior can be modified more easily,
suggesting that behavior is a key mechanism through which people can pursue greater SWB in their lives.
Subjective Well-Being
Relatedly, the role of variety in the success of SWB intervention (Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2012) informs
our understanding of the nature of hedonic adaptation and of the ways to combat it.
Although a great deal of progress has been achieved, many questions remain to be addressed
within this intervention framework. One important area for future research, as mentioned above, is to
examine the duration of SWB intervention effects. While some existing studies show lasting effects in
follow-ups of several months (e.g., Seligman et al., 2005), additional work with longer follow-ups is
needed. Furthermore, researchers should continue to examine aspects of interventions (e.g., facilitating
continued practice of skills) that might help to sustain initial gains in SWB. Future work might also
examine the influence of these intervention strategies on a broad array of aspects of life that have been
shown to follow from SWB. Does intervening to increase SWB also have downstream effects on health,
relationships, prosocial behaviors, and cognitive outcomes such as creativity? Answers to these questions
could bolster other experimental and longitudinal evidence that aims to tease apart the causal direction in
the relationships between SWB and other positive aspects of life (Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005).
Finally, future work could further test the effectiveness of multi-dimensional interventions that include a
range of SWB activities (e.g., Hausmann et al., 2014) compared to the traditional single-activity
approach. Does a more multimodal intervention program produce greater effects on SWB and other
important outcomes? Are these effects lasting?
National Accounts of Well-Being to Build Better Societies
The 21st century has ushered in a new era of assessing national prosperityone that goes far
beyond the overall output of a nation’s economy, traditionally measured by indicators such as General
Domestic Product (GDP), and takes into account the overall SWB of its citizens (Diener & Seligman,
2004). In the past several decades, governments and international organizations have begun
systematically assessing the SWB of people across the world. By comparing the SWB of citizens between
countries and within countries over time, researchers have revealed valuable insights into the economic
and social policies that make for a happier nation (for a recent review, see Diener, Oishi, & Lucas, 2015).
Comparisons of SWB between countries have shown that people are happier in nations that are
Subjective Well-Being
economically developed, whose governments are efficient and relatively less corrupt, and where the rule
of law, human rights, and political freedoms are well protected (Diener et al., 1995; Diener, Kahneman et
al., 2010; Helliwell, et al., 2014; Radcliff, 2013; Tay, Herian, & Diener, 2014). These findings are far
from surprising, of course, but they speak to the validity of SWB as an overall indicator of a nation’s
prosperity. Within-country analyses over time have also produced important findings about how
economic conditions and policies influence SWB. Between 1972 and 2008, for example, SWB of
Americans was higher when income inequality was low than when income inequality was high; this effect
held even after controlling for household income (Oishi et al., 2011). Notably, in the same period that
income inequality grew (19722008), the GDP of the U.S. (adjusted for inflation) almost tripled. This
highlights the insufficiencies of GDP as an indicator of the overall prosperity of a nation and its citizens.
The science of SWB has also revealed insights about hotly debated policies and societal
conditions. For example, progressive taxationtaxing richer individuals at a higher rate than poorer
individualshas been shown to predict higher SWB. Across 57 nations, people living in countries with
more progressive taxation reported greater life satisfaction and more positive emotions than individuals in
countries with less progressive taxation (Oishi et al., 2012). Importantly, this relationship held even after
controlling for national GDP and income inequality and individual-level differences in age, sex, and other
demographics. These between-nation findings are also supported by within-country analyses over time. In
the late 1970s, individuals in the U.S. in the lowest income bracket paid 70% less in taxes than those in
the highest income bracket; in the late 1980s, this difference had shrunk to 13%. Using such within-
country variation in progressive taxation between 1972 and 2008, researchers are finding that individuals
in the lower income brackets experience greater SWB when progressive taxation is high (Oishi, in prep;
Oishi & Diener, 2014). Importantly, greater progressive taxation over the same period had no significant
deleterious effect on the happiness of middle and high-income individuals. This suggests that taxing the
rich more than the poor may be a sound policy for raising the overall SWB of a nation’s citizens.
The association of progressive taxation with SWB across nations can largely be explained by
citizens’ satisfaction with public services (e.g., healthcare quality) which are enabled by these policies
Subjective Well-Being
(Oishi et al., 2012). Indeed, citizens in countries that provide better healthcare coverage have higher SWB
(Boarini, Comola, Smith, Manchin, & de Keulenaer, 2012). Beyond health, nations with more generous
social welfare policies also tend to be happier (Radcliff, 2013). For example, SWB is higher in countries
where citizens can rely on greater unemployment benefits. Importantly, such support seems to benefit the
employed and the unemployed (Di Tella, MacCulloch, & Oswald, 2003). Similarly, more generous
parental leave policies have also been associated with higher SWB. In Germany, for example, a 2007
expansion of benefits for parents was associated with a subsequent increase in parental SWB (Myrskyla
& Margolis, 2013). Finally, the poor, but not the rich, report higher SWB in Denmark than in the U.S.,
pointing to the possible importance of income support programs, which are greater in Denmark.
Strong environmental and urban zoning policies that reduce pollution and increase green space
also predict higher SWB (Luechinger, 2009; MacKerron & Mourato, 2009). Respondents to the U.S.
General Social Survey, for example, reported greater SWB when surveyed on days with lower air
pollution within their local area (Levinson, 2012). In addition, experimental, quasi-experimental, and
longitudinal studies show that people living in areas with more green space tend to have higher SWB
(Hartig, Evans, Jamner, Davis, & Garling, 2003; Velarde, Fry, & Tveit, 2007). In one particularly large-
scale study, MacKerron and Mourato (2013) combined GPS data with over 1 million ESM survey reports
from over 20,000 participants across the UK. Controlling for a number of potential confounds, the authors
found that participants were happier when they were outdoors in all green or natural habitats compared to
when they were in urban environments. One reason, though not the only one, for these beneficial effects
may be that communal green spaces facilitate social interactions with neighbors (Kuo, Sullivan, Coley,
and Brunson, 1998), which are associated with SWB (Sandstrom & Dunn, 2014a; b).
Overall, the evidence seems to suggest that many politically liberal policiesprogressive
taxation, greater income equality, more generous welfare statepredict higher SWB. While data can
hardly be blamed for having political affiliations, the evidence does point to the conclusion that SWB is
higher in societies that care for the disadvantaged. The existing evidence does, however, also support
policies that are normally associated with a more conservative political agenda. Government efficiency,
Subjective Well-Being
for example, is associated with higher SWB both in cross-national analyses and within-country analyses
over time (Helliwell, et al., 2014). In addition, individuals tend to become happier after marriage even
after controlling for pre-marriage happiness (Anusic et al., 2014; Yap, Anusic, & Lucas, 2012). These
findings suggest that policies that support family values and encourage the formation of stable family
units could further improve the SWB of citizens. The new science of SWB can thus help societies
transcend political biases and adopt a data-driven approach to policies that make citizens happier. Still,
more research using rigorous research methods, including experimental, quasi-experimental, and
longitudinal methods, is needed to translate research into policy. We encourage researchers across the
subdisciplines of psychology, from environmental psychologists to prejudice researchers, to leverage
national SWB data to examine the effectiveness of policies and interventions on citizens’ SWB.
In 1968, Robert Kennedy gave a speech in which he observed that GDP “measures everything…
except that which makes life worthwhile” (John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum).
Reflecting Kennedy’s prescient sentiment, governments today are moving towards a more holistic
assessment of the prosperity of their nations. The new science of national SWB is producing invaluable
insights into the social policies and economic conditions that truly make for a happy nation.
Some psychologists may see SWB as an area of research that is separate from their own. This
perception is misguided because this is an area that can be studied from many angles, across the
subdisciplines of psychology. Furthermore, the scientific findings on SWB can be used in many of the
applied fields of the behavioral sciences. The effects of SWB on downstream behavior are particularly
relevant to many areas of the discipline, as are recent interventions to raise SWB. The fact that SWB is
not unitary, but is a multidimensional concept also has a number of implications for many areas of
psychology. Thus, we hope that in the years ahead, knowledge of the science of SWB will become more
integrated into the diverse subdisciplines of psychology and beyond.
Subjective Well-Being
Anusic, I., Yap, S.C.Y., & Lucas, R.E. (2014). Testing set-point theory in a Swiss national sample: Reaction and
adaptation to major life events. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1265-1288.
Arvey, R.D., Bouchard, T.J.J., Segal, N. L., & Abraham, L. M. (1989). Job satisfaction: Environmental and
genetic components. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 187-192.
Barak, Y. (2006). The immune system and happiness. Autoimmunity Reviews, 5, 523-527.
Berry, D.S., & Hansen, J. S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 71, 796-809.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta.
Social Indicators Research, 55, 329-352.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2006). The subjective well-being of the homeless, and lessons for
happiness. Social Indicators Research, 76, 185-205.
Biswas-Diener, R., Vittersø, J., & Diener, E. (2005). Most people are pretty happy, but there is cultural variation:
The Inughuit, the Amish, and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205-226.
Boarini, R., Comola, M., Smith, C., Manchin, R., & De Keulenaer, F. (2012).What makes for a better life?: The
determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countriesEvidence from the Gallup World Poll (No.
2012/3). OECD Publishing.
Boehm, J. K., Lyubomirsky, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011). A longitudinal experimental study comparing the
effectiveness of happiness-enhancing strategies in Anglo Americans and Asian Americans. Cognition &
Emotion, 25, 1263-1272.
Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley
(Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (pp. 287-302). New York: Academic Press.
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness
relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917.
Bryant, F.B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Burton, C.M., & King, L.A. (2004). The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences. Journal
of Research in Personality, 38, 150-163.
Candell, G.L., & Hulin, C.L. (1986). Cross-language and cross-cultural comparisons in scale translations:
Independent sources of information about item nonequivalence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
17, 417-440.
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Carnevale, P.J.D., & Isen, A.M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and vaiusal access on the discovery of
integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
37, 1-13.
Cheavens, J.S., Feldman, D.B., Gum, A., Michael, S.T., & Snyder, C.R. (2006). Hope therapy in a community
sample: A pilot investigation. Social Indicators Research, 77, 61-78.
Chen, G., Kirkman, B.I., Kim, K., Farh, C.I.C., & Tangirala, S. (2010). When does cross-cultural motivation
enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support
and cultural distance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1110-1130.
Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2008). Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of
prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 741-756.
Cho, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Domain satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between work-family spillover
and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-13.
Church, A.T., Katigbak, M.S., Locke, K.D., Zhang, H., Shen, J., de Jesús Vargas-Flores, J., ... & Mastor, K.A.
(2013). Need satisfaction and well-being testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 507-534.
Clark, A.E., Georgellis, Y., & Sanfey, P. (2001). Scarring: The psychological impact of past unemployment.
Economica, 68, 221-241.
Cohn, M.A., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2010). In search of durable positive psychology interventions: Predictors and
consequences of long-term positive behavior change. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 355-366.
Subjective Well-Being
Cox, K. (2012). Happiness and unhappiness in the developing world: Life satisfaction among sex workers, dump-
dwellers, urban poor, and rural peasants in Nicaragua. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 103-128.
Cunningham, M.R. (1988). What do you do when you’re happy or blue? Mood, expectancies, and behavioral
interest. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 309-330.
Curhan, K.B., Sims, T., Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S., Karasawa, M., Kawakami, N., ... & Ryff, C. D. (2014). Just
how bad negative affect is for your health depends on culture. Psychological Science, 25, 2277-2280.
Danner, D.D., Snowdon, D.A., & Friesen, W.V. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings
from the nun study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 804-813.
Darr, W., & Johns, G. (2008). Work, strain, health, and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational
Health Psychology, 13, 293-318.
Davidson, R.J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S.F., ... & Sheridan, J.F.
(2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic
Medicine, 65, 564-570.
De Neve, J.E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J.
Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World Happiness Report 2013. (pp. 54-79). New York: UN
Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Gagne, M., Leone, D.R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B.P. (2001). Need satisfaction,
motivation, and well-being in the work-organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural
study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930-942.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American
Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
Diener, E., & Chan, M. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and
longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 1-43.
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181-185.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851-864.
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of
Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Diener, E., Inglehart, R. and Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators
Research, 112, 497527.
Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2010). Income’s association with judgments of life versus
feelings. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well- being (pp.
3–15). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., Kanazawa, S., Suh, E.M., & Oishi, S. (2015). Why people are in a generally good mood. Personality
and Social Psychology Review, 19, 235-256.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Scollon, C.N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of
well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305-314.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R.E. (2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. American Psychologist,
70, 234-242.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R.E. (2016). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81-84.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological
Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1-31.
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the
Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 135-149.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 267-276.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many
Subjective Well-Being
dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1278-1290.
Tenney, E., Poole, J., & Diener, E. (2015). Subjective well-being and organizational performance. In A. Brief &
B. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-
being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators
Research, 97, 143-156.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of
Economics and Statistics, 85, 809827.
Dunn, E.W., Aknin, L.B., & Norton, M.I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319,
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices.
Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 621-640.
Emmons, R.A., & McCullough, M.E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of
gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377-
Epley, N., & Schroeder, J. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 143, 1980-1999.
Erdogan, B., Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., & Mansfield, L.R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life
satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38, 1038-1083.
Faragher, E.B., Cass, M., & Cooper, C.L. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and health: A meta-
analysis. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 62, 105-112.
Fava, G.A., & Tomba, E. (2009). Increasing psychological well-being and resilience by psychotherapeutic
methods. Journal of Personality, 77, 1903-1934.
Fitzgerald, L.F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L., Gelfand, M.J., & Magley, V.J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences
of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,
Flavin, P., Pacek, A.C., & Radcliff, B. (2011). State intervention and subjective well-being in advanced industrial
democracies. Politics & Policy, 39, 251269.
Ford, M.T., Heinen, B.A., & Langkamer, K.L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis
of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57-80.
Frederickson, B.L., & Levenson, R.W. (1998). Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequelae
of negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 191-220.
Fredrickson, B.L. (2000). Why positive emotions matter in organizations: Lessons from the broaden-and-build
model. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 4, 131-142.
Fredrickson, B.L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K.A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S.M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive
emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1045-1062.
Freeman, R.B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. The American Economic Review, 68, 135-141.
Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set-point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 88, 158-164.
Fulmer, C.A., Gelfand, M.J., Kruglanski, A.W., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Pierro, A., & Higgins, E. T. (2010).
On "Feeling Right" in cultural context: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-
being. Psychological Science, 21, 1563-1569.
Galinha, I., Garcia-Martín, M, Gomes, C., & Oishi, S. (in press). Criteria for happiness among the very poor
Mozambique. International Perspectives in Psychology.
Ganster, D. C., & Schaubroeck, J. (1991). Work stress and employee health. Journal of Management, 2, 235-271.
George, E. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137,
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood,
negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50,
Subjective Well-Being
Gruber, J., Mauss, I.B., & Tamir, M. (2011). A dark side of happiness: How, when, and why happiness is not
always good. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 222-233.
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational
Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., Asplund, J.W., Killham, E.A., & Agrawal, S. (2010).Causal impact of employee work
perceptions on the bottom line of organizations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 378-389.
Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., & Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction,
employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-
Hartig, T., Evans, G.W., Jamner, L.D., Davis, D.S., & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and
urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109123.
Hartmann, G.W. (1934). Personality traits associated with variations in happiness. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 29, 202-212.
Hausmann, L.R., Parks, A., Youk, A.O., & Kwoh, C.K. (2014). Reduction of bodily pain in response to an online
positive activities intervention. The Journal of Pain, 15, 560-567.
Hausmann, N., Mueller, K., Hattrup, K., & Spiess, S.O. (2013). An investigation of the relationships between
affective organisational commitment and national differences in positivity and life satisfaction. Applied
Psychology: An International Review, 62, 260-285.
Helliwell, J.F., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Harris, A., & Huang, H. (2009). International evidence on the social
context of well-being (No. w14720). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Helliwell, J.F., Huang, H., Grover, S., & Wang, S. (2014). Good governance and national well-being: What are
the linkages? OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 25. Paris, France: OECD.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World.
Howell, A.J., Passmore, H.A., & Holder, M.D. (2015) Implicit theories of well-being predict well-being and the
endorsement of therapeutic lifestyle changes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-17.
Howell, R.T., & Howell, C.J. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing
countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 536-560.
Huang, X., & Van de Vliert, E. (2004). Job level and national culture as joint roots of job satisfaction. Applied
Psychology: An International Review, 53, 329-348.
Hulin, C.L., & Judge, T.A. (2003). Job Attitudes. In W. C. Borman, D.R. Ilgen, & R.J. Klimoski (Eds.),
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (pp 255-276). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Hülsheger, U.R., Alberts, H.J.E.M., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J.W.B. (2013). Benefits of mindfulness at work: The
role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 98, 310-325.
James, G.D.,Yee, L.S.,Harshfield, G.A.,Blank, S.G., & Pickering, T.G. (1986). The influence of happiness, anger,
and anxiety on the blood pressure of borderline hypertensives. Psychosomatic Medicine, 48, 502-508.
Joshanloo, M., Lepshokova, Z.K., Panyusheva, T., Natalia, A., Poon, W.C., Yeung, V.W.L., ... & Tsukamoto, S.
(2014). Cross-cultural validation of fear of happiness scale across 14 national groups. Journal of Cross-
Cultural Psychology, 45, 246-264.
Judge, T.A., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Another look at the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 78, 939-948.
Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F., Podsakoff, N.P., Shaw, J.C., & Rich, B.L. (2010). The relationship between pay and
job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 157-167.
Judge, T.A., Thoreson, C.J., Bono, J.E., & Patton, G.K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship:
A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407.
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being.
Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16489-16493.
Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-308.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., & Glaser, R. (1992). Psychoneuroimmunology: Can psychological interventions module
immunity? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 569-575.
Subjective Well-Being
King, L.A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,
Kirk, B.A., Schutte, N.S., & Hine, D.W. (2011). The effect of an expressive-writing intervention for employees
on emotional self-efficacy, emotional intelligence, affect, and workplace incivility. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 41, 179-195.
Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially
engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 91, 890903.
Kok, B.E., Coffey, K.A., Cohn, M.A., Catalino, L.I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S.B., . . . Fredrickson, B.L.
(2013). How positive emotions build physical health: Perceived positive social connections account for
the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone. Psychological Science, 24, 1123-1132.
Koo, J., & Suh, E.M. (2012). Happiness predicts objective academic performance. Korean Journal of Social and
Personality Psychology, 26, 35-50.
Kuo, F.E., Sullivan, W.C., Coley, R.L., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city
neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 823851.
Kushlev, K., Heintzelman, S.J., Lutes, L.D., Wirtz, D., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2016). ENHANCE: Design and
Rationale of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Promoting Happiness.
Kuykendall, L., & Tay, L. (2015). Employee subjective well-being and physiological functioning: An integrative
model. Health Psychology Open, 2, 1-11.
Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis.
Psychological Bulletin, 141, 364-403.
Kwan, V.S.Y., Bond, M.H., and Singelis, T.M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding
relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 10381051.
Lambert, N.M., Gwinn, A.M., Baumeister, R.F., Strachman, A., Washburn, I.J., Gable, S.L., & Fincham, F.D.
(2013). A boost of positive affect: The perks of sharing positive experiences. Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships, 30, 24-43.
Lawler, E.J., Thye, S.R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohension in productive exchange. American
Journal of Sociology, 106, 616-657.
Layous, K., Lee, H., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Culture matters when designing a successful happiness-
increasing activity: A comparison of the United States and South Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural
Psychology, 44, 1294-1303.
Layous, K., Nelson, S.K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). What is the optimal way to deliver a positive activity
intervention? The case of writing about one’s best possible selves. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 635-
Lent, R.W. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial
adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 482-509.
Levine, E.L., Xu, X., Yang, L.Q., Ispas, D., Pitariu, H.D., Bian, R., . . . Musat, S. (2011). Cross-national
explorations of the impact of affect at work using the state-trait emotion measure: A coordinated series of
studies in the United States, China, and Romania. Human Performance, 24, 405-442.
Levinson, A. (2012). Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of Public
Economics, 96, 869- 880.
Liu, B., Floud, S., Pirie, K., Green, J., Peto, R., & Beral, V. (2015). Does happiness itself directly affect
mortality? The prospective UK Million Women Study. Lancet.
Liu, C., Borg, I., & Spector, P. E. (2004). Measurement equivalence of the German Job Satisfaction Survey used
in a multinational organization: Implications of Schwartz's culture model. Journal of Applied Psychology,
89, 1070-1082.
Lount, J.R.B. (2010). The impact of positive moood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 420-433.
Lucas, R.E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after
major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 75-79.
Subjective Well-Being
Luechinger, S. (2009). Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. The Economic Journal, 119, 482
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R.E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events:
A meta-analysis on differences between cognitive and affective well-being. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 102, 592-615.
Luhmann, M., Lucas, R.E., Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2013). The prospective effect of life satisfaction on life events.
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 39-45.
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186-189.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 57-62.
Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J.K., & Sheldon, K.M. (2011). Becoming happier takes both a will and
a proper way: an experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion, 11, 391-402.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to
success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855.
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K.M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable
change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111-131.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2009). Life satisfaction and air quality in London makes a better life? The
determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 68, 14411453.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental
Change, 23, 992-1000.
Marsland, A.L., Pressman, S., & Cohen, S. (2007). Positive affect and immune function.
Psychoneuroimmunology, 2, 761779.
Mathieu, C., Neumann, C.S., Hare, R.D., & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy
and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59,
Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work
behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, 591-622.
Myrskyla, M., & Margolis, R. (2013). Parental benefits improve parental well-being: Evidence from a 2007
policy change in Germany. Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
Nelson, S.K., Della Porta, M.D., Jacobs Bao, K., Lee, H.C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2015). ‘It’s up to you’:
Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two
cultures over six weeks. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 463-476.
Nes, R.B., & Roysamb, E. (2015). The heritability of subjective well-being: Review and meta-analysis. In M.
Pluess (Ed.), The Genetics of Psychological Well-Being: The Role of Heritability and Genetics in Positive
Psychology. (pp.75-96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oh, I.S., Guay, R.P., Kim, K., Harold, C.M., Lee, J.H., Heo, C.G., & Shin, K.H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A
meta-analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment fit dimensions with work attitudes
and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67, 99-152.
Oishi, S. (2012). The psychological wealth of nations: Do happy people make a happy society? Malden, MA:
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal? Policy Insights from the Behavioral
and Brain Sciences, 1, 195-203.
Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R.E. (2007). The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy?
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346-360.
Oishi, S., & Gilbert, E.A. (2016). Current and future directions of culture and happiness research. Current
Opinion in Psychology, 8, 54-58.
Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 559-577.
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095-
Oishi, S., Schimmack U., & Diener, E. (2012) Progressive taxation and the subjective well-being of nations.
Subjective Well-Being
Psychological Science, 23, 86-92.
Okten, C., Osili, U., & Ozer, E. (in prep). Life satisfaction and charitable giving: New evidence from the PSID.
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P.M., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2013). Do it yourself: An online positive psychology
intervention to promote positive emotions, self-efficacy, and engagement at work. Career Development
International, 18, 173-195.
Parker, C.P., Baltes, B.B., Young, S.A., Huff, J.W., Altmann, R.A., Lacost, H.A., & Roberts, J.E. (2003).
Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389-416.
Parks, A. C., & Schueller, S.M. (Eds.). (2014). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of positive psychological
interventions. Wiley Blackwell.
Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. (2009). What are the reasons for differences in job satisfaction across Europe?
Individual, compositional, and institutional explanations. European Sociological Review, 25, 535-549.
Pinquart, M., & Forstmeier, S. (2012). Effects of reminiscence interventions on psychosocial outcomes: A meta-
analysis. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 541-558.
Podsakoff, N.P., LePine, J.A., & LePine, M.A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor
relationships with job attitudies, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438-454.
Pressman, S.D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925971.
Pressman, S.D., & Cohen, S. (2012). Positive emotion word use and longevity in famous deceased psychologists.
Health Psychology, 31, 297-305.
Priller, E., & Schupp, J. (2011). Social and economic characteristics of financial and blood donors in Germany.
DIW Economic Bulletin, 6, 239-256.
Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J.J. (2015). Positive interventions: An emotion regulation
perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 655-693.
Radcliff, B. (2013). The political economy of human happiness: How voters’ choices determine the quality of life.
New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rentfrow, P.J., Mellander, C., & Florida, R. (2009). Happy states of America: A state-level analysis of
psychological, economic, and social well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1073-1082.
Richardson, K.M., & Rothstein, H.R. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A
meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 69-93.
Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 472-481.
Roysamb, E., Nes, R.B., & Vitterso, J. (2014). Well-being: Heritable and changeable. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E.
Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change. (pp, 9-36).
Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press.
Salzberg, S. (1995). Loving-kindness: The revolutionary art of happiness. Boston: Shambhala.
Sandstrom, G.M., & Dunn, E.W. (2014a). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging
and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 437442.
Sandstrom, G.M., & Dunn, E.W. (2014b). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 900922.
Scandura, T.A., & Lankau, M.J. (1997). Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to
organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 377-391.
Schaefer, J.A., & Moos, R.H. (1998). Effects of work stressors and work climate on long-term care staff's job
morale and functioning. Research in Nursing and Health, 19, 63-73.
Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life
satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 395-406.
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2002). Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and
unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism? Cognition &
Emotion, 16, 705-719.
Subjective Well-Being
Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and
subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 82, 582-593.
Schnall, P.L., Pieper, C., Schwartz, J.E., Karasek, R.A., Schlussel, Y., et al. (1990). The relationship between ‘job
strain,’ workplaces diastolic blood pressure, and left ventricular mass index. JAMA, 263, 1929-1935.
Schueller, S.M. (2010). Preferences for positive psychology exercises. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5,
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive
functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513523.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Kommer, D., & Wagner, D. (1987). Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: Mood
effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains. European Journal of
Social Psychology, 17, 6979.
Scollon, C.N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal
of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 304-326.
Seligman, M.E., Rashid, T., & Parks, A.C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61, 774-788.
Seligman, M.E., Steen, T.A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation
of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410-421.
Sheldon, K.M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of
expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 73-82.
Sheldon, K.M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). The challenge of staying happier testing the hedonic adaptation
prevention model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 670-680.
Sheldon, K.M., Boehm, J.K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Variety is the spice of happiness: The hedonic
adaptation prevention (HAP) model. In I. Boniwell & S. David (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness.
(pp. 901914). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Sin, N.L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive
psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology,65, 467-487.
Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A.A. (2000). Well-being at work: A cross-national analysis of the levels and
determinants of job satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29, 517-538.
Stanton, K., & Watson, D. (2014). Positive and negative affective dysfunction in psychopathology. Social and
Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 555-567.
Steptoe, A., Dockray, S., & Wardle, J. (2009). Positive affect and psychobiological processes relevant to health.
Journal of Personality, 77, 1747-1776.
Stoeva, A.Z., Chiu, R.K., & Greenhaus, J.H. (2002). Negative affectivity, role stress, and work-family conflict.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 1-16.
Stowell, J.R., McGuire, L., Robles, T., Glaser, R., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (2003). Psychoneuroimmunology. In A.
M. Nezu, C.M. Nezu, & P.A. Geller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 75-95). New York: Wiley.
Strack, F., Martin, L.L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information
use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 429442.
Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E.(2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving
(CIT) and Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6, 251-279.
Suh, E.M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 83, 13781391.
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H.C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across
cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482493.
Takeuchi, R. (2010). A critical review of expatriate adjustment research through a multiple stakeholder view:
Progress, emerging trends, and prospects. Journal of Management, 36, 1040-1064.
Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
101, 354-365.
Tay, L., Diener, E., Drasgow, F., & Vermunt, J.K. (2011). Multilevel mixed-measurement IRT analysis: An
explication and application to self-reported emotions around the world. Organizational Research
Methods, 14, 177-207.
Subjective Well-Being
Tay, L., & Harter, J.K. (2013). Economic and labor market forces matter for worker well-being. Applied
Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 5, 193-208.
Tay, L., Herian, M., & Diener, E. (2014). Corruption in society and happiness. Social Psychological &
Personality Science, 5, 751759.
Tay, L., & Kuykendall, L. (2013). Promoting happiness: The malleability of individual and societal-level
happiness. International Journal of Psychology, 159-176.
Templer, K.J. (2012). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: The importance of agreeableness in a
tight and collectivistic Asian society. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 114-129.
Thomas, L.T., & Ganster, D.C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and
strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6-15.
Tims, M., Bakker, A.B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-
being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 230-240.
Tsai, J.L., Louie, J.Y., Chen, E.E., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Learning what feelings to desire: Socialization of ideal
affect through children's storybooks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 17-30.
Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations.
Emotion, 9, 441456.
Uchida, Y., & Oishi, S. (2016). The happiness of individuals and the collective. Japanese Psychological
Research, 58, 125-141.
Vanhove, A.J., Herian, M.N., Perez, A.L.U., Harms, P.D., & Lester, P.B. (2015). Can resilience be developed at
work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology.
Velarde, M.D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes: Landscape types in
environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 199212.
Vittersø, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005). The divergent meanings of life satisfaction: Item response
modeling of the satisfaction with life scale in Greenland and Norway. Social Indicators Research, 74,
Watson, D. (1988). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to
health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
54, 1020-1030.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and
negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070
Weiss, A., Adams, M.J., & King, J.E. (2011). Happy orangutans live longer lives. Biology Letters, 7, 872-874.
Weiss, H.M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes
and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1-74.
Weiss, H.M., & Rupp, D. (2011). Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology. Industrial
Organizational Psychology, 4, 83-97.
Whelan, D.C., & Zelenski, J.M. (2012). Experimental evidence that positive moods cause sociability. Social
Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 430-437.
Wierzbicka, A. (2004). “Happiness” in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective. Daedalus, 133, 34-43.
Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of
organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
Wrzeniewski, A., & Dutton, J.E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work.
Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.
Wu, C.H., Luksyte, A., & Parker, S. (2015). Overqualification and subjective well-being at work: The moderating
role of job autonomy and culture. Social Indicators Research, 121, 917-937.
Yap, S.C., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R.E. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life
events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 477
Yuki, M., Sato, K., Takemura, K., & Oishi, S. (2013). Social ecology moderates the association between self-
esteem and happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 741-746. !
... Employee well-being is the general assessment of one's life, encompassing both the quality of an employee's experience and their performance at work, incorporates factors such as life satisfaction and emotional well-being, all of which impact individual productivity (Huang et al., 2016). Hedonic and subjective well-being are two distinct ways to measure employee well-being (Braaten & Huta, 2018;Diener et al., 2017;Pradhan & Hati, 2022). While hedonic well-being focuses on an individual's happiness and contentment in life, subjective well-being pertains to their overall level of satisfaction with their life (Braaten & Huta, 2018;Czerw, 2019;Dhiman, 2021;Diener et al., 2017). ...
... Hedonic and subjective well-being are two distinct ways to measure employee well-being (Braaten & Huta, 2018;Diener et al., 2017;Pradhan & Hati, 2022). While hedonic well-being focuses on an individual's happiness and contentment in life, subjective well-being pertains to their overall level of satisfaction with their life (Braaten & Huta, 2018;Czerw, 2019;Dhiman, 2021;Diener et al., 2017). ...
... organisations can manage challenges enabling their employees to achieve higher job satisfaction and psychological well-being (Diener et al., 2017;Pradhan & Hati, 2022). For example, Lamb and Cogan (2016) noted the influence of resilience on employee well-being in a qualitative study. ...
Full-text available
This study examines the moderating role of employee ambidexterity on how high-performance work systems and employee resilience relates to organisational resilience and employee well-being during crises. Additionally, it explores the influence of organisational resilience on employee well-being during crises. This study used a quantitative approach. Two-wave cross-sectional data were obtained from 324 employees of pharmaceutical manufacturing firms in Ghana and analysed using Structural Equation Modelling-Partial Least Squares. The findings indicated that a high-performance work system plays a crucial role in enhancing the link between organizational resilience and employee well-being. Although employee resilience was found to influence on organizational resilience and employee well-being positively, this effect is not statistically significant. The results also indicate that the role of exploitation ambidexterity is vital in strengthening the relationship between high-performance work systems, employee resilience, organizational resilience, and employee well-being, particularly during crises. This provides a comprehensive analysis of the influence of high-performance work systems, employee resilience, and employee ambidexterity on both organizational resilience and employee well-being. Additionally, using personal and organisational resources to examine how they promote employee well-being during crises empirically provides new insights into resilience and well-being literature.
... Psychologists refer to the investigation of factors that influence people's positive or negative emotions and life experiences as "Subjective Well-Being" [2] , Where the term " Subjective " refers to the researcher's assessment of the Subjective Well-Being through the judgmental information provided by the respondents, such as experiments, questionnaires, etc. Among the definitions of Subjective Well-Being, Diener et al [3] have the most representative and accepted definition, suggesting that Subjective Well-Being is the result of evaluating the quality of one's life according to one's own subjectively set criteria, and consists of four dimensions: life satisfaction, evaluation of various aspects of life, positive emotions, and negative emotions. Huajian Cai et al [4] consider the cognitive side of Subjective Well-Being: life satisfaction, also the affective side of Subjective Well-Being: positive and negative emotional experiences of the individual, in their judgments of Subjective Well-Being. ...
... Chính vì vậy, hạnh phúc chủ quan đã trở thành tiêu điểm nghiên cứu trong nhiều lĩnh vực 5 . Dần dần, hạnh phúc chủ quan ngày càng được sử dụng để lý giải các cơ chế tâm lý hành vi và chất lượng cuộc sống xã hội 6 . Do đó, việc giải thích sự hình thành của hạnh phúc chủ quan đối với sinh viên giúp cho các cơ sở giáo dục đại học cũng như bản thân sinh viên cải thiện hoặc duy trì trạng thái tâm lý tích cực. ...
Full-text available
The psychology of young people is of interest to academia, but it is difficult to measure this subject's psychological formation mechanisms. However, ensuring their psychological well-being is an urgent task because this is the primary source of labour in the future of society. Current studies often focus on positive factors affecting people's subjective well-being. At the same time, negative aspects have not been given due attention to the impact of incivility behaviours in the surroundings. Therefore, this study was conducted to understand the relationship between rude behaviour at university and students' subjective well-being under the mediated influence of perceived emotions. Survey data was collected by convenient sampling method with a survey designed on Google Forms and sent links to student forums in Vietnam. Data were collected from 600 students studying at universities in Ho Chi Minh City and analyzed using PLS-SEM to test the research hypotheses. Research results show that incivility in educational environments impact students' emotions, affecting their subjective well-being. In particular, incivility has the strongest negative effect on the emotional exhaustion of students but do not affect their regulation of emotion. In addition, this study also confirmed the effect of emotional support and compassion on the above relationship in the role of mediator or moderator.
... A estrutura do bem-estar subjetivo, é tripartite, composta pela dimensão cognitiva (satisfação com a vida) e pela dimensão afetiva que possui dois componentes, os afetos positivos e afetos negativos (Diener et al., 1999;Diener et al., 2005;Diener et al., 2017). A dimensão cognitiva se refere aos aspectos racionais e intelectuais, a julgamentos globais da vida, tais como, satisfação com o trabalho, a saúde, a vida escolar, relacionamentos, entre outros. ...
Full-text available
Introduction This study examines the relationship between teacher growth mindset, mindfulness, grit, and teacher well-being, with a particular emphasis on the mediating role of grit. Methods The study involved 547 Chinese EFL teachers as participants. Data collection utilized validated measures of growth mindset, mindfulness, grit, and occupational well-being. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the data and investigate the proposed relationships. Results The findings reveal several important relationships. Firstly, both teacher growth mindset and teacher grit exhibit a direct positive influence on teacher well-being. Secondly, teacher grit acts as a mediator in the connection between teacher mindfulness and teacher occupational well-being. This suggests that the positive impact of mindfulness on well-being is, in part, explained by the presence of grit. Discussion These findings significantly contribute to our comprehension of the factors influencing teacher well-being. They underscore the importance of cultivating growth mindset, mindfulness, and grit in educational contexts. Moreover, the implications of these findings for teacher training and support programs are discussed.
For affective science to advance, researchers will need to develop a better understanding of neutral affect. At first glance, neutral affect may seem uninteresting to some affective scientists because the goal is to investigate hedonic experiences, not the presumed absence of them. This failure to fully consider and examine neutral affect, however, limits the field’s potential for new discoveries. In this paper, I discuss how a greater understanding of neutral affect can inform researchers’ views of valence, subjective well-being, and behavior. I define neutral affect and discuss evidence indicating that neutral affect is a commonly felt state that occurs independently of positive and negative affect. These data suggest that to understand the entirety of the affective landscape, researchers should move beyond traditional measures of valence and consider how positive, negative, and neutral affective states might inform their phenomenon of interest. I then illustrate how neutral affect might be a key, albeit complex, influence on subjective well-being. I also discuss how neutrality might be a fundamental and unique predictor of inaction. If affective scientists want to fully understand how feelings operate and function, it is essential that they explore the possibility that neutral affect might hold some of the essential clues needed to solve their affective puzzle.
Full-text available
Subjective well-being (SWB) is an extremely active area of research with about 170,000 articles and books published on the topic in the past 15 years. Methodological and theoretical advances have been notable in this period of time, with the increasing use of longitudinal and experimental designs allowing for a greater understanding of the predictors and outcomes that relate to SWB, along with the process that underlie these associations. In addition, theories about these processes have become more intricate, as findings reveal that many associations with SWB depend on people’s culture and values and the context in which they live. This review provides an overview of many major areas of research, including the measurement of SWB, the demographic and personality-based predictors of SWB, and process-oriented accounts of individual differences in SWB. In addition, because a major new focus in recent years has been the development of national accounts of subjective well-being, we also review attempts to use SWB measures to guide policy decisions.
Using data from 17 years of a large and nationally representative panel study from Germany, the authors examined whether there is a set point for life satisfaction (LS)--stability across time, even though it can be perturbed for short periods by life events. The authors found that 24% of respondents changed significantly in LS from the first 5 years to the last 5 years and that stability declined as the period between measurements increased. Average LS in the first 5 years correlated .51 with the 5-year average of LS during the last 5 years. Height, weight, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and personality traits were all more stable than LS, whereas income was about as stable as LS. Almost 9% of the sample changed an average of 3 or more points on a 10-point scale from the first 5 to last 5 years of the study.
The effect of a grateful outlook on psychological and physical well-being was examined. In Studies 1 and 2, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental conditions (hassles, gratitude listing, and either neutral life events or social comparison); they then kept weekly (Study 1) or daily (Study 2) records of their moods, coping behaviors, health behaviors, physical symptoms, and overall life appraisals. In a 3rd study, persons with neuromuscular disease were randomly assigned to either the gratitude condition or to a control condition. The gratitude-outlook groups exhibited heightened well-being across several, though not all, of the outcome measures across the 3 studies, relative to the comparison groups. The effect on positive affect appeared to be the most robust finding. Results suggest that a conscious focus on blessings may have emotional and interpersonal benefits.
Handwritten autobiographies from 180 Catholic nuns, composed when participants were a mean age of 22 years, were scored for emotional content and related to survival during ages 75 to 95. A strong inverse association was found between positive emotional content in these writings and risk of mortality in late life (p < .001). As the quartile ranking of positive emotion in early life increased, there was a stepwise decrease in risk of mortality resulting in a 2.5-fold difference between the lowest and highest quartiles. Positive emotional content in early-life autobiographies was strongly associated with longevity 6 decades later. Underlying mechanisms of balanced emotional states are discussed.
Psychologists, self-help gurus, and parents all work to make their clients, friends, and children happier. Recent research indicates that happiness is functional and generally leads to success. However, most people are already above neutral in happiness, which raises the question of whether higher levels of happiness facilitate more effective functioning than do lower levels. Our analyses of large survey data and longitudinal data show that people who experience the highest levels of happiness are the most successful in terms of close relationships and volunteer work, but that those who experience slightly lower levels of happiness are the most successful in terms of income, education, and political participation. Once people are moderately happy, the most effective level of happiness appears to depend on the specific outcomes used to define success, as well as the resources that are available. © 2007, Association for Psychological Science. All rights reserved.
Individuals who are higher in subjective well-being not only feel happier, they are more likely have fulfilling relationships, increased work performance and income, better physical health, and longer lives. Over the past several decades, the science of subjective well-being has produced insights into these benefits of happiness, and—recognizing their importance—has begun to examine the factors that lead to greater well-being, from cultivating strong relationships to pursuing meaningful goals. However, studies to date have typically focused on improving subjective well-being by intervening with singular constructs, using primarily college student populations, and were short-term in nature. Moreover, little is understood about the impact of a well-being treatment delivered online vs. in-person. In the present article, we describe a comprehensive intervention program including 3-month initial treatment followed by a 3-month follow-up, ENHANCE: Enduring Happiness and Continued Self-Enhancement. One-hundred and sixty participants will be recruited from two different sites to participate in one of two versions of ENHANCE: in-person (n = 30) vs. wait-list control (n = 30); or online (n = 50) vs. wait-list control (n = 50). Assessments will be completed at baseline, three months and six months. Our primary outcome is change in subjective well-being across treatment (3 months) and follow-up (6 months). Secondary outcomes include self-report and objective measures of health, as well as a psychological mediators (e.g., psychological needs) and moderators (e.g., personality) of treatment outcomes. We hope to provide researchers, practitioners, and individuals with an evidence-based treatment to improve happiness and subjective well-being.