ArticlePublisher preview available

Drawing to Distract: Examining the Psychological Benefits of Drawing Over Time

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Individuals gravitate toward the arts during times of emotional stress. We examined the benefits of drawing over several sessions to determine whether drawing improves mood and, if so, whether it does so because it allows for emotional expression or distraction. After inducing a sad mood, we asked participants (n = 40) to draw over 4 consecutive days. Half of the participants were instructed to draw as a way to express their feelings (express condition) and half were instructed to draw as a way to focus and observe (distract condition). Mood was measured after the first and final testing session and a life satisfaction scale was administered at the beginning of the first testing session and after the final session. We found that drawing to distract improved mood more than drawing to express, both after a single drawing session and after 4 sessions. These findings are consistent with previous findings on drawing, but run counter to reports on the relative health benefits of expressive writing. We suggest drawing and writing may affect mood through different mechanisms.
Drawing to Distract: Examining the Psychological Benefits of Drawing
Over Time
Jennifer E. Drake
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Ingrid Hastedt and Ciara James
Boston College
Individuals gravitate toward the arts during times of emotional stress. We examined the benefits of
drawing over several sessions to determine whether drawing improves mood and, if so, whether it does
so because it allows for emotional expression or distraction. After inducing a sad mood, we asked
participants (n40) to draw over 4 consecutive days. Half of the participants were instructed to draw
as a way to express their feelings (express condition) and half were instructed to draw as a way to focus
and observe (distract condition). Mood was measured after the first and final testing session and a life
satisfaction scale was administered at the beginning of the first testing session and after the final session.
We found that drawing to distract improved mood more than drawing to express, both after a single
drawing session and after 4 sessions. These findings are consistent with previous findings on drawing,
but run counter to reports on the relative health benefits of expressive writing. We suggest drawing and
writing may affect mood through different mechanisms.
Keywords: drawing, emotion regulation, distraction, emotional expression
Individuals gravitate toward the arts during times of emo-
tional stress: art is made in prisons as a way to communicate
(Safe Street Arts Foundation, 2013) and drawings are made
after natural disasters as a way to cope with emotional distress
(Dewan, 2007). Art-making has many possible therapeutic ben-
efits: it is a way to make meaning of an event, a way to
communicate distress and thus provide some kind of relief, and
a way to regulate emotions (Winner, 1982). Individuals with no
training in the arts turn to the arts in times of trouble: the arts
provide meaning and purpose (they help us express our feel-
ings) as well as a means of distraction (they shift our attention
away from what is upsetting us).
The Benefits of Drawing
The arts provide constructive ways of dealing with trauma.
Visual artists have often talked about art as a form of therapy.
Artists may realize—whether consciously or unconsciously—that
creating art has the power to improve mood. Many case studies of
patients receiving art therapy report mood improvement (e.g.,
Briks, 2007;Pifalo, 2006;Tipple, 2008) and a few experimental
studies have also demonstrated that art therapy is beneficial in
reducing trauma-related symptoms (Schouten, de Niet, Knip-
scheer, Kleber, & Hutschemaekers, 2015). However, there is lim-
ited experimental research on the benefits of art therapy and,
furthermore, these studies cannot tell us whether the art therapy
was causally implicated in the improvement since art therapy is
typically coupled with other kinds of therapy. Also, art therapy is
an activity that varies across clients and has many uses and takes
a variety of forms. According to the American Art Therapy As-
sociation (2013), it “uses art media, the creative process, and the
resulting artwork to explore feelings, reconcile emotional con-
flicts, foster self-awareness, manage behavior and addictions, de-
velop social skills, improve reality orientation, reduce anxiety, and
increase self-esteem.” The question still remains whether the sim-
ple act of drawing has psychological benefits outside of an art
therapy setting.
While research on the psychological benefits of art is still in its
infancy, recent evidence has demonstrated that making art has
immediate benefits. De Petrillo and Winner (2005) showed that
drawing improves mood more strongly than does copying geomet-
ric shapes, arguably because copying is not as engaging as draw-
ing. Other researchers have examined the relative benefits of using
drawing as a means of expression versus using drawing as a means
of distraction. Dalebroux, Goldstein, and Winner (2008) had par-
ticipants watch a sad film clip and then randomly assigned them to
complete one of three activities: scan a sheet of symbols (non-
drawing task), draw something happy (distraction), or draw some-
thing expressing their mood (expression). They found that imme-
diately after drawing, mood improved the most when drawing was
used as a form of distraction rather than expression. The mood
This article was published Online First June 23, 2016.
Jennifer E. Drake, Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City
University of New York; Ingrid Hastedt and Ciara James, Department of
Psychology, Boston College.
This research was supported by Brooklyn College of the City University
of New York. We thank Ellen Winner for her comments on an earlier
version of this article.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer
E. Drake, Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY
11210. E-mail: jdrake@brooklyn.cuny.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts © 2016 American Psychological Association
2016, Vol. 10, No. 3, 325–331 1931-3896/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000064
325
... Some studies compare drawing to nondrawing activities (e.g., writing or sitting quietly), others compare drawing to more passive arts activities (e.g., coloring), and still, others compare the effectiveness of different emotion regulation strategies while drawing (e.g., drawing to distract from negative affect and drawing to express negative affect). Drawing to distract improves affect more than writing (Drake et al., 2011) or the mere passage of time (as measured by sitting quietly, Drake & Winner, 2012) and does so after a single session of drawing as well as multiple sessions of drawing over several days (Drake et al., 2016) and one month (Drake, 2019). These benefits also extend to a variety of affective states: drawing to distract improves sadness (Drake & Winner, 2012) and reduces anger (Diliberto-Macaluso & Stubblefield, 2015;Genuth & Drake, 2021) and anxiety (Turturro & Drake, 2021) more than drawing to express. ...
... Does making art increase positive affect, decrease negative affect, or both? Across several studies, using drawing as a form of distraction improved positive affect more than drawing to express (e.g., Drake et al., 2016;Forkosh & Drake, 2017). The benefits of drawing on negative affect are somewhat less clear. ...
... The benefits of drawing on negative affect are somewhat less clear. While some studies have shown that drawing to distract decreases negative affect more than drawing to express (Drake et al., 2016;Forkosh & Drake, 2017), other studies have shown that both drawing to distract and drawing to express reduce negative affect (Drake, 2019;Drake & Winner, 2012;Genuth & Drake, 2021). The important point to note here is that drawing does improve affect, with the benefits stronger (as indicated by consistent improvements in positive affect) when drawing is used as a form of distraction rather than expression. ...
Article
In two studies, we compared whether making and viewing art improved affect and whether the affective benefits were due to participants’ experience of enjoyment and flow. In Study 1, participants engaged in an art-making and art-viewing activity separated by one week. In Study 2, participants were randomly assigned to an art-making or art-viewing activity. In both studies, we induced a negative mood in participants by having them watch a sad film clip. We measured positive and negative affects before and after the mood induction and after the activity. In Study 2, participants rated levels of enjoyment and flow experienced during the activity. Both making and viewing art reduced negative affect equally. However, making art improved positive affect more than viewing art, and making art was associated with greater enjoyment than viewing art. Actively making art is a potentially more powerful way to improve affect than passively viewing art.
... Some studies compare drawing to nondrawing activities (e.g., writing or sitting quietly), others compare drawing to more passive arts activities (e.g., coloring), and still, others compare the effectiveness of different emotion regulation strategies while drawing (e.g., drawing to distract from negative affect and drawing to express negative affect). Drawing to distract improves affect more than writing (Drake et al., 2011) or the mere passage of time (as measured by sitting quietly, Drake & Winner, 2012) and does so after a single session of drawing as well as multiple sessions of drawing over several days (Drake et al., 2016) and one month (Drake, 2019). These benefits also extend to a variety of affective states: drawing to distract improves sadness (Drake & Winner, 2012) and reduces anger (Diliberto-Macaluso & Stubblefield, 2015;Genuth & Drake, 2021) and anxiety (Turturro & Drake, 2021) more than drawing to express. ...
... Does making art increase positive affect, decrease negative affect, or both? Across several studies, using drawing as a form of distraction improved positive affect more than drawing to express (e.g., Drake et al., 2016;Forkosh & Drake, 2017). The benefits of drawing on negative affect are somewhat less clear. ...
... The benefits of drawing on negative affect are somewhat less clear. While some studies have shown that drawing to distract decreases negative affect more than drawing to express (Drake et al., 2016;Forkosh & Drake, 2017), other studies have shown that both drawing to distract and drawing to express reduce negative affect (Drake, 2019;Drake & Winner, 2012;Genuth & Drake, 2021). The important point to note here is that drawing does improve affect, with the benefits stronger (as indicated by consistent improvements in positive affect) when drawing is used as a form of distraction rather than expression. ...
... Substantial mechanistic clarity may be gained by developing more robust computational models that can operate on a broader range of images to predict a greater variety of abstract meanings beyond the identity of individual objects. Moreover, people produce pictures for other purposes than to communicate efficiently about conceptsindeed, drawings can also induce an aesthetic response 67 and be used for emotional regulation 68,69 . An important direction for future work would thus also be to investigate the relationship between the cognitive processes involved in drawing-based communication and the full set of psychological mechanisms involved during the production and interpretation of drawings in these other contexts. ...
Article
Full-text available
How do drawings—ranging from detailed illustrations to schematic diagrams—reliably convey meaning? Do viewers understand drawings based on how strongly they resemble an entity (i.e., as images) or based on socially mediated conventions (i.e., as symbols)? Here we evaluate a cognitive account of pictorial meaning in which visual and social information jointly support visual communication. Pairs of participants used drawings to repeatedly communicate the identity of a target object among multiple distractor objects. We manipulated social cues across three experiments and a full replication, finding that participants developed object-specific and interaction-specific strategies for communicating more efficiently over time, beyond what task practice or a resemblance-based account alone could explain. Leveraging model-based image analyses and crowdsourced annotations, we further determined that drawings did not drift toward “arbitrariness,” as predicted by a pure convention-based account, but preserved visually diagnostic features. Taken together, these findings advance psychological theories of how successful graphical conventions emerge.
... While many families tend to gravitate toward arts or creative activities, such as digital content to cope (Drake et al., 2016;Kapoor & Kaufman, 2020;Karwowski et al., 2020) during the COVID 19 lockdowns, a paucity of studies still exists concerning creative activities especially among intergenerational families during COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, this manifest content analysis investigation was undertaken to understand the landscape of intergenerational families' creative activities showcased on digital content-sharing platforms, such as YouTube and TikTok. ...
Article
With limited activities to conduct at home during the pandemic lockdowns, families worldwide have turned to social media to socialize and cope with the impacts of isolation. Likewise, online content-sharing sites has been seen as a promising avenue for family units to conduct creative activities together as a form of bonding and coping during the COVID-19 lockdown. As such, this investigation was undertaken to understand the landscape of intergenerational families’ creative activities showcased on digital content-sharing platforms, such as YouTube and TikTok. The analysis of the surface characteristics of collected YouTube (n = 50) and Tiktok (n = 446) videos in this study revealed that April 2020 (YouTube = 28%; Tiktok = 28.97%) was the month were most videos featuring creative activities by intergenerational families were uploaded. Interestingly, most of the videos uploaded came from North American countries (YouTube = 54%; Tiktok = 52.91%). Vlogging (52%) was found to be the most practiced creative activities by intergenerational families on YouTube during the COVID-19 lockdown months while for Tiktok, recreation of family photos (13.84%) was preponderant. The implications the study’s findings, limitations and recommendations were also discussed.
Chapter
Creativity is usually seen as a good thing, but why? The Creativity Advantage first offers an overview of creativity studies with an emphasis on the little-discussed benefits of being creative. These include how creativity can lead to self-insight, help people heal, forge connections with others, inspire drive, and enable people to leave behind a meaningful legacy. Written in an engaging style and illustrated with interesting anecdotal material, this book offers a new perspective on creativity scholarship that can serve as an introduction to the field for newcomers or as a way to encourage new avenues for research.
Article
Learning how to regulate emotions is a significant developmental milestone in a child’s life. It is important to understand which activities help children cope with emotionally distressing situations. One such activity, I argue, is drawing. In this article, I consider 2 ways in which drawing elevates mood in children: drawing allows them to be distracted from their negative thoughts and feelings; or it allows them to express (and thus vent) their negative thoughts and feelings. Using drawing as a means of distraction proves more effective, perhaps because drawing to distract is more enjoyable and more absorbing than using drawing as a means of expression. Engaging in arts activities over many months not only increases positive emotions but also lowers stress as measured by cortisol levels. Taken together, this work demonstrates the important role that the arts play in children’s emotional lives.
Chapter
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions provides a state-of-the-art review of research on the role of emotions in creativity. This volume presents the insights and perspectives of sixty creativity scholars from thirteen countries who span multiple disciplines, including developmental, social, and personality psychology; industrial and organizational psychology; neuroscience; education; art therapy, and sociology. It discusses affective processes – emotion states, traits, and emotion abilities – in relation to the creative process, person, and product, as well as two major contexts for expression of creativity: school, and work. It is a go-to source for scholars who need to enhance their understanding of a specific topic relating to creativity and emotion, and it provides students and researchers with a comprehensive introduction to creativity and emotion broadly.
Chapter
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Emotions provides a state-of-the-art review of research on the role of emotions in creativity. This volume presents the insights and perspectives of sixty creativity scholars from thirteen countries who span multiple disciplines, including developmental, social, and personality psychology; industrial and organizational psychology; neuroscience; education; art therapy, and sociology. It discusses affective processes – emotion states, traits, and emotion abilities – in relation to the creative process, person, and product, as well as two major contexts for expression of creativity: school, and work. It is a go-to source for scholars who need to enhance their understanding of a specific topic relating to creativity and emotion, and it provides students and researchers with a comprehensive introduction to creativity and emotion broadly.
Article
Full-text available
A research synthesis was conducted to examine the relationship between a written emotional expression task and subsequent health. This writing task was found to lead to significantly improved health outcomes in healthy participants. Health was enhanced in 4 outcome types—reported physical health, psychological well-being, physiological functioning, and general functioning—but health behaviors were not influenced. Writing also increased immediate (pre- to postwriting) distress, which was unrelated to health outcomes. The relation between written emotional expression and health was moderated by a number of variables, including the use of college students as participants, gender, duration of the manipulation, publication status of the study, and specific writing content instructions.
Article
Full-text available
In a pilot study we investigated whether the most effective medium for regulating short-term affect depends on one's preference for drawing or writing, and also investigated the emotion regulation strategy (distraction versus expression) spontaneously chosen when drawing and writing. Eighty undergraduates indicated their preference for drawing or writing. After a sad mood induction, half were assigned to their preferred activity and half to their non-preferred activity. Positive and negative affect was assessed before and after the activity, and participants reported whether they used the activity to express or to distract themselves. Negative affect was significantly lower after drawing than after writing, even when the preferred activity indicated was writing. Participants were more likely to use drawing to distract and writing to express.
Article
Positive emotions include pleasant or desirable situational responses, ranging from interest and contentment to love and joy, but are distinct from pleasurable sensation and undifferentiated positive affect. These emotions are markers of people's overall well-being or happiness, but they also enhance future growth and success. This has been demonstrated in work, school, relationships, mental and physical health, and longevity. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions suggests that all positive emotions lead to broadened repertoires of thoughts and actions and that broadening helps build resources that contribute to future success. Unlike negative emotions, which are adapted to provide a rapid response to a focal threat, positive emotions occur in safe or controllable situations and lead more diffusely to seeking new resources or consolidating gains. These resources outlast the temporary emotional state and contribute to later success and survival. This chapter discusses the nature of positive emotions both as evolutionary adaptations to build resources and as appraisals of a situation as desirable or rich in resources. We discuss the methodological challenges of evoking positive emotions for study both in the lab and in the field and issues in observing both short-term (“broaden”) and long-term (“build”) effects. We then review the evidence that positive emotions broaden perception, attention, motivation, reasoning, and social cognition and ways in which these may be linked to positive emotions' effects on important life outcomes. We also discuss and contextualize evidence that positive emotions may be detrimental at very high levels or in certain situations. We close by discussing ways in which positive emotions theory can be harnessed by both basic and applied positive psychology research.
Article
Art psychotherapy has been found to be particularly helpful for those patients who have difficulty expressing or identifying feelings, those uncomfortable with verbal communication, or conversely those adept at using words to hide their thoughts and feelings. The use of art in therapy provides an alternate, less threatening means of expression that enriches therapeutic communication. The purpose of this chapter is to illustrate how art psychotherapy delivered by the author helped an adolescent female who was experiencing self-harming behavior. Research and a case study are presented.
Article
Previous studies have found that writing about upsetting experiences can improve physical health. In an attempt to explain this phenomenon, 72 first-year college students were randomly assigned to write about either their thoughts and feelings about coming to college or about superficial topics for three consecutive days. Measures of language use within the writing samples and cognitive measures of accessibility and schematic organisation were collected in the weeks before and after writing. As in previous studies, writing about college was found to reduce health centre visits for illness and to improve subjects' grade point average. Text analyses indicated that the use of positive emotion words and changes in words suggestive of causal and insightful thinking were linked to health change. Improved grades, although not linked to these language dimensions, were found to correlate with measures of schematic organisation of college-relevant themes. Implications for using written language to understand cognitive and health processes are discussed.
Article
This study uses linguistic analysis to investigate psychological changes associated with an emotion regulation strategy integrating psychological acceptance and positive reappraisal, as compared to two established strategies. Two hundred and sixty-nine undergraduate participants wrote for 4 consecutive days, 20 minutes each day, about the biggest problem in their lives and were randomly assigned to use one of three emotion regulation strategies: (a) acceptance + positive reappraisal, (2) emotional disclosure, or (3) positive reappraisal. Linguistic analyses were conducted to examine changes in attentional focus and insightful and causal thinking in the writings. Results indicated that participants who integrated acceptance and positive reappraisal wrote less about the past and more about the future, and used more insight words, over the course of writing relative to the other two conditions. In addition, they used a decreasing amount of first-person singular pronouns (e.g., “I”) and increased more in their use of first-person plural pronouns (e.g., “we”). Implications of these language findings for understanding underlying psychological changes are discussed.
Article
We investigated whether artmaking improves mood, and if so, whether this effect is best explained by "catharsis" or "redirection." In Experiment 1, participants viewed tragic images and then either drew a picture based on their feelings or copied shapes. Those who drew exhibited more positive mood after drawing; those who copied shapes did not. Mood improved equally for those who drew negative and nonnegative images, suggesting that for some, catharsis led to improved mood and that for others, redirection led to improved mood. In Experiment 2, to test whether artmaking improved mood simply because people were distracted by making a drawing, we gave participants a word puzzle to complete, a task that does not allow expression of feeling through symbolic content. Completion of a word puzzle did not improve mood. These results suggest that artmaking increases the pleasure dimension of mood and does so via either catharsis or redirection.
Article
Research has shown that traumatic stress has negative effects on overall health and well-being. Traumatic exposure has been linked to higher rates of psychological and physical health problems. Writing about trauma or stress has been shown to improve health and reduce stress, but can negatively affect mood. The purpose of this study was to examine whether art therapy is as effective as writing therapy in improving psychological and health outcomes. Participants in the writing condition, but not the art therapy condition, showed a decrease in social dysfunction. However, participants who completed artwork reported more enjoyment, were more likely to continue with the study, and were more likely to recommend the study to family and friends. Future research could combine writing and art therapy to determine whether a mixed design would both improve health and maximize participant retention.