ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

By 2030, it is estimated that 65 percent of the global population will live in cities, and most of the additional three billion world population projected by 2050 will be added to cities. The process of urbanization is typically driven by push and pull factors, but national government policy is emerging as another important driver in countries like China, where urbanization is closely linked to industrialization and economic growth. There are numerous challenges associated with rapid urbanization, including providing for rapidly growing urban populations, managing air pollution, reducing carbon emissions, preparing for climate change risks, and improving social integration and governance procedures. A consorted approach integrating local, national, and international efforts, and mobilizing all sectors and actors is required. In this regard, understanding cities as systems that are nested within larger systems will be critical. Solutions are most likely to vary across cities and will be context dependent. Nonetheless, there are some high-level principles for building sustainable, resilient, and healthy cities, and although still a long way to go, there are some encouraging signs towards implementing these principles from international, national, and local levels. Of particular importance is the role of the university, which is increasingly finding cities as living laboratories and becoming the engine of innovation
No caption available
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
www.thesolutionsjournal.org|May-June 2016|  Solutions  |55
Feature
by Xuemei Bai, Barbara Norman, and Peter Edwards
Navigating through the
Urban Age: Principles and Innovations
In Brief
By 2030, it is estimated that 65 percent of the global population will live in cities, and most of the additional three billion 
world population projected by 2050 will be added to cities. The process of urbanization is typically driven by push and 
pull factors, but national government policy is emerging as another important driver in countries like China, where 
urbanization is closely linked to industrialization and economic growth. There are numerous challenges associated 
with rapid urbanization, including providing for rapidly growing urban populations, managing air pollution, reducing 
carbon emissions, preparing for climate change risks, and improving social integration and governance procedures. 
A consorted approach integrating local, national, and international efforts, and mobilizing all sectors and actors is 
required. In this regard, understanding cities as systems that are nested within larger systems will be critical. Solutions 
are most likely to vary across cities and will be context dependent. Nonetheless, there are some high-level principles for 
building sustainable, resilient, and healthy cities, and although still a long way to go, there are some encouraging signs 
towards implementing these principles from international, national, and local levels. Of particular importance is the 
role of the university, which is increasingly finding cities as living laboratories and becoming the engine of innovation.
Bai, X., B. Norman, and P. Edwards. (2016). Navigating through the Urban Age: Principles and Innovations. Solutions 7(3): 55–62.
https://thesolutionsjournal.com/article/navigating-through-the-urban-age-principles-and-innovations/
Tokyo Form
Tokyo is a rapidly growing megacity, projected to have a population of 37 million by the year 2030.
56  |  Solutions  |  May-June 2016 |www.thesolutionsjournal.org
By 2030, it is estimated that 65 
percent of the global popula-
tion will live in cities.1 In the 
longer term, the world’s population is 
projected to be 10 billion by 2050 with 
most of the additional three billion 
living in cities. To accommodate these 
extra three billion people, we will 
need to build the equivalent of one 
new city that can support one million 
people every five days between now 
and 2050.2 In practice, most of these 
people will be accommodated through 
the expansion of cities, with the 
consequence that, by 2030, the world 
is projected to have 41 megacities with 
more than 10 million inhabitants, 
including Tokyo with 37 million and 
Delhi with 36 million.
Population growth is just 
one aspect of urbanization. It is 
accompanied by the urbanization 
of the landscape, which can expand 
even faster than urban population 
growth.3 According to the World 
Bank, the urban area in the Pearl 
River Delta grew from 4500 sq. km. in 
2000 to nearly 7000 sq. km. in 2010.4
As cities are typically located in 
fertile land, the consequences of this 
expansion for agriculture and the 
food security of urban populations 
have become matters of increasing 
concern.
Urbanization can take different 
forms, ranging from the growth of 
existing cities (Mexico City), to the 
merging of several urban centers into 
urban regions (Pearl Delta Region, 
China) and corridors, and to the 
emerging ‘smart’ cities developed on 
sustainable principles (Songdo, South 
Korea).
Major drivers of urbanization 
include push factors from rural areas 
when traditional livelihood becomes 
impossible, and pull factors from 
cities with better employment and 
education opportunities. The migra-
tion between rural areas and cities 
is becoming increasingly mobile 
and bidirectional, for example, 
increasing circular migration in 
sub-Saharan Africa or the large 
number of floating peasant workers 
in China,7 largely responding to 
economic opportunities in urban 
areas. A third driver of urbanization 
is the targeted governmental policy 
to promote urbanization for eco-
nomic growth, as urban expansions 
feed into economic growth,6 and 
urbanization is closely linked to an 
expanding middle class, particularly 
in rapidly industrializing countries 
such as China. The increasing con-
sumption power of these new urban 
middle classes is seen by govern-
ments as a new driver of domestic 
demand and economic growth.17
Challenges
There are numerous challenges 
associated with rapid urbanization. 
Providing for rapidly growing urban 
populations, managing air pollution, 
reducing carbon emissions, preparing 
for climate change risks, and improv-
ing social integration and governance 
procedures are several examples.
The provision of sufficient and 
affordable infrastructure, such as 
housing, water supply, sanitation, 
and transportation options to meet 
the demands of a growing urban 
population requires large investments 
in cities. In addition to the financial 
requirements, planning for smart 
infrastructure is a key consideration 
that will require investment in knowl-
edge and skill development at the 
national and local levels. In particular, 
national energy systems servicing 
large urban conurbations will experi-
ence transformational change in the 
very near future. Indeed, the roll-out 
and integration of renewable energy 
into old and new cities has become 
a priority for many large utility 
providers.
Air quality is an example of the 
possible negative externalities of 
rapid urban expansion. This is being 
experienced in a very tangible way 
in large developing nations. During 
early December 2015, the first two red-
notices for ‘heavy air pollution’ were 
issued by the China Meteorological 
Administration, highlighting the 
growing human health dimension of 
maintaining a sustainable city.7,8 The 
social and economic consequences 
of these notices were immediate and 
severe, as they required the closure 
of factories, businesses, and schools. 
Another example is the Asian brown
cloud that sweeps over Asian countries, 
including India and Malaysia, high-
lighting the interconnectedness of 
urban and natural systems. Primarily 
generated by wood and forest fires, 
transport, and industrialization 
processes, the brown cloud is having a 
major impact on human health.9
Key Concepts
• The world is entering an urban
age, with 65 percent of world
population projected to be urban
dwellers by 2030. In addition to the
traditional push and pull factors,
national government policy can play
a significant role in promoting and
shaping urbanization.
• Urbanization brings about multiple
challenges, ranging from providing
for new urban dwellers to manag-
ing urban social, economic, and
environment issues and to reducing
carbon emissions and preparing
for climate change risks. Tackling
these challenges effectively will be
a significant opportunity to shape
alternative urban futures.
• A consorted approach integrating
local, national, and international
efforts, and mobilizing all sectors
and actors is required, and a systems
approach is essential.
• Solutions are most likely to vary
across cities and will be context
dependent. Nonetheless, there are
some high-level principles that can
guide finding and implementing
solutions.
• Universities can play a critical role
in finding urban solutions, by being
engines for innovation in cities,
which serve as living laboratories.
www.thesolutionsjournal.org|May-June 2016|  Solutions  |57
At the larger scale, climate change 
is one of the greatest challenges. 
Cities are major contributors to global 
carbon emissions, accounting for 75 
percent of world final energy use and 
76 percent of carbon dioxide emissions 
(both numbers are median figures 
from the estimated range).10,11 In high-
income countries where urban rural 
income disparity is less significant, 
cities can scale benefits to provide 
infrastructure more efficiently, and 
thus can be less carbon-intensive than 
in rural areas. In developing countries, 
on the other hand, urban–rural 
income disparity remains significant, 
with urban dwellers on average 
consuming more than their rural 
counterparts, and the urban way of 
life is typically more carbon-intensive. 
Finding ways to achieve a low-carbon 
urban development is an urgent task, 
as the majority of urban growth will 
take place in the developing world.
Climate risks and vulnerabilities 
present enormous challenges for the 
planning of our cities. Many major 
cities are located along coastal areas and 
will suffer from the impacts of climate 
change (e.g. flooding, coastal inunda-
tion, extreme weather). Studies show 
significant costs from these impacts, 
with limited adaptation options, and 
developing cities being particularly 
vulnerable.12 Planners usually regard 
the physical environment as relatively 
stable and rarely consider the possibility 
of significant changes in the urban 
landscape due, for example, to large-
scale coastal erosion. Indeed, despite the 
fact that a more dynamic environment 
will bring with it a raft of legal, social, 
economic, and environmental conse-
quences, many new developments take 
place in areas at high risk from flooding 
and coastal inundation. This requires 
cities to adapt a planning system that 
can respond to changes occurring at a 
scale never previously encountered and 
to make urban design more climate-
sensitive.13 Some global cities such as 
London, New York, and Melbourne are 
planning ahead for climate adaptation. 
10 Principles to Make our Cities Liveable19
Empower cities: More financial power should be delegated to cities in proportion
to their responsibilities. In addition, it is important to recognize their rightful place in
policy processes and implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Current
implementation strategies emphasize country, regional, and international approaches,
without much focus on cities. Challenge cities to adopt the goals—and compete and
cooperate to achieve them.
National level support: It is important to realize urban issues are not the
responsibility of local government alone. The aggregated social and economic power
and environmental impacts of cities are often comparable to that of entire nations, but
their potential cannot be properly tapped without support. Having a place in the national
government institutional structure is essential.
Integrate new migrants and other vulnerable populations into the urban fabric:
In China alone, there are 250 million people termed the “floating population” who come
to cities to work but often without adequate social security or health care support.
These people are often systematically discriminated against by cities’ bureaucracies.
Adopt a people-centred approach to urbanization, nurturing a sense of belonging and
enhanced participatory governance.
Beyond city limits: Ensure policies and management decisions at the city level take
into account the regional and global context and interactions.
Coordinated long-term vision: As cities grow and new cities emerge, we need a
coordinated long-term vision of urban development. Unrealistically ambitious outlooks
and over competition result in redundant infrastructure and inefficient resource use.
Prepare for future risks: Cities need to be prepared not only for the risks arising from
global phenomena such as climate change, but also those arising from local processes.
For example, numerous cities sit on deltas, and many of the world’s deltas are sinking as
a result of extraction and the concentration of high-rise buildings.
Implementation and accountability: Many cities suffer from air and water pollution,
where local officials prioritize economic development over environmental quality;
or worse, corruption is rife and officials are bribed to ignore regulations. Enhancing
implementation of environmental regulation and reducing corruption will have a
dramatic effect on the liveability of cities.
More science in planning and decision-making: We do not have a full grasp
of how cities as complex systems behave and respond to intervention. For example,
decisions about transport can affect housing, industry, energy consumption, and health
in unexpected ways. Unintended adverse consequences can be minimized through closer
collaboration on science and urban policies. Moreover, the main urban research institutes
are in wealthy countries. The most rapid urbanization will happen in Africa and Asia. We
need more urban research institutes in these areas linked to local and national policies.
Nurture cultural innovation: Cities are centers of rapid cultural innovation. Evidence
shows that cultural shifts in cities, for example, “Cycling is cool” or “Wasting food is
a shame,” have the potential to deliver significant sustainability outcomes within and
beyond cities.
Facilitate city-to-city learning: Cities learn from each other more than from anything
else. However, engagement in such peer learning can be constrained by local capacity,
and this is where upper-level government and international organizations can help. In
doing so, we must recognize that solutions are not one-size-fits-all. It is also important
to recognize that learning and sharing doesn’t have to be unidirectional.
58  |  Solutions  |  May-June 2016 |www.thesolutionsjournal.org
However, much of the world’s urban 
population will continue to live in 
small to medium urban centers, with 
half of the world’s urban residents 
living in relatively small cities of less 
than 500,000 inhabitants. With only 
around one in eight currently living 
in the 28 megacities with more than 
10 million inhabitants, planning for 
cities at different scales is an important 
consideration.14
Urbanization also presents critical 
social challenges. China alone has a 
‘floating population’ of over 260 million 
working in coastal cities. Though vast 
in numbers, these workers are not fully 
integrated into the urban fabric.15,16
Wider considerations of climate justice 
and social equity are also emerging 
as fundamental societal concerns in 
planning for cities, climate change, and 
planetary boundaries.17,18 Exacerbating 
these impacts will be the potential for 
increasing social and economic divides 
in both developed and developing 
nations resulting in increasing issues of 
urban access and equity.
Some broader societal trends also 
present new challenges to cities, for 
example, planning for an aging society 
such as in Japan and the revitalizing (or 
not) of shrinking cities such as former 
industrial cities like Detroit. These 
are complex issues that will bring 
winners and losers within and among 
cities, whatever the planning response. 
This diversity of outcomes is nothing 
new in itself, but the risk that certain 
groups will be severely disadvantaged 
increases with the pace of change. For 
this reason, any strategic planning for 
urban settlements must consider possi-
ble impacts for vulnerable groups such 
as the elderly, and wider consequences 
for the region. Indeed, the complexity 
of these issues highlights the neces-
sity for all levels of government to be 
involved in developing solutions.
Solutions
To effectively address the diverse 
urban challenges ranging from the 
more traditional issues such as hous-
ing, transport, water, and energy to 
the emerging issues of climate change 
and planetary boundaries, requires 
a consorted approach integrating 
Momo Go
Urban agricultural plots lie below high rises in Songdo, South Korea. The city was designed as a new ‘smart’ city, built with sustainable principles.
www.thesolutionsjournal.org|May-June 2016|  Solutions  |59
local, national, and international 
efforts, and mobilizing all sectors 
and actors. In this regard, a systems 
understanding and approach —that 
is, understanding cities as systems 
rather than a collection of individual 
sectors that are nested within larger 
systems—will be critical to finding 
solutions for the future.
Solutions are most likely to vary 
across cities and will be context 
dependent. Differences may be due 
to the functional differences of cities 
or the scale of cities across the urban 
hierarchy, from global cites such 
as New York and Shanghai to small 
coastal urban centers, as well as across 
the development stages and per-capita 
income spectrum. Nonetheless, there 
are some high-level principles in terms 
of adopting a systems approach (see 
box on page 57). These principles are 
essential to effectively address urban 
challenges and build sustainable, 
resilient, and healthy cities.
There are some encouraging 
signs and progresses towards finding 
Future Cities Laboratory: Innovative Research for Sustainable Cities
A report recently published documents how “the world’s leading
universities have embarked on a building boom for urban research.”
In the last ten years, more than a dozen labs, departments, and schools
have been launched with the common goal of researching quantitative
and computational approaches to understanding cities as systems.22
One of these new institutions is the Singapore–ETH Centre, founded
in 2010, which supports two major research programs: Future Cities
Laboratory (FCL) and Future Resilient Systems (FRS).
Both programs are multidisciplinary and aimed at developing
practical solutions to improve the resilience and sustainability of
cities. However, any such solutions must be based upon a sound
understanding of how cities work, and this remains very limited. As
Geoffrey West, former director of the Santa Fe Institute, remarked,
we “desperately need a serious scientific theory of cities—relying
on underlying generic principles that can be made into a predictive
framework.” FCL focuses it efforts upon the ‘metabolism’ of cities,
studying them as complex systems characterized by stocks and flows
of resources, including energy, water, capital, and information. FRS,
on the other hand, relies heavily upon complexity theory, treating
urban infrastructure systems as complex sociotechnical systems
composed not only of engineered structures, but also of the people
who make up the subsystems of users and operators.
Three examples illustrate the kinds of problem-oriented research
undertaken at the Singapore–ETH Centre and the challenges it
faces in putting new knowledge into practice. The first concerns
a project to improve the efficiency of air cooling, which in cities
such as Singapore can account for as much as one-third of all
electricity consumed. In preliminary experiments, a research team
of architects and engineers found it could reduce the energy needed
for cooling by as much as 50 percent by using a combination of
radiant-heat exchangers, decentralized ventilation, and wireless
sensors and controls. And there was another important benefit: the
new system needed much less space for ducting and machinery, so
that buildings could potentially be smaller and use fewer materials
in their construction. But despite these evident benefits, it proved
very difficult to find a developer who was prepared to install the
first system in a new building. Fortunately, a local private school
was prepared to take this risk, and the new system has now been
successfully installed in the school’s new administrative block,
where it is attracting great interest. The lesson learned from this
experience is that new ideas need to be demonstrated. We suggest
that cities could contribute to achieving sustainability by providing
the opportunities to test new ideas.
The second example concerns a project to develop a new approach
to urban river rehabilitation. The river in question is the heavily polluted
Ciliwung River in Jakarta, which floods regularly, causing untold
misery to residents in low-lying parts of the city. The research team of
hydrologists, engineers, and landscape architects used a combination
of hydrologic, hydrodynamic, and 3-D landscape modelling to assess
the consequences of potential interventions in the urban landscape.
Working closely with stakeholders, they developed design scenarios
for the Ciliwung as a public green corridor, which would restore the
riparian ecosystems and greatly improve the quality of life for local
communities. A major public event was organized to encourage public
authorities and funding agencies to implement this project, though
the response so far has been modest. The lesson learned is that
implementing radical solutions requires patience and persistence.
The third example concerns the development of tools for simulating
and visualizing urban processes. At the heart of FCL is a sophisticated
digital laboratory, Value Lab Asia, with state-of-the-art facilities
for modelling 3-D and multidimensional data. As well as being an
essential research tool, this laboratory provides an important means
for working with practitioners. Architects and planners, for example,
can visualize the changing plumes of heat swirling around buildings
as wind speed and direction changes and explore how new designs
might affect a city’s heat balance. Transport planners can gain a
bird’s eye view of the city’s traffic streaming through the streets and
test how traffic flow might be affected by adding a new bus route
or providing motorists with more information about congestion. Not
surprisingly, this facility attracts great interest from industry and
government agencies. The lesson learned is that good visualization
provides a powerful means for translating research ideas into
practical solutions.
In conclusion, the ‘new urban science’ is emerging rapidly as a
coherent body of theory and knowledge about how urban systems
function and change. Researchers in this field are challenged to
leave the ivory tower and collaborate with government agencies
and industrial partners in producing knowledge and ideas for a more
sustainable urban future. And in doing so, they are changing the ways
that universities do their work.
60  |  Solutions  |  May-June 2016 |www.thesolutionsjournal.org
solutions. The magnitude of urban 
challenges and the new opportunities 
of addressing them are increasingly 
recognized internationally. Recent 
inclusion of sustainable, resilient, and 
healthy human settlement as one of the 
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 
is one of such example. This year the 
UN Habitat III conference, a major UN 
conference that is held once every 20 
years, will be held in Ecuador, and a 
series of global and regional initiatives 
are being undertaken in the run up 
towards it. Cities are gaining increasing 
legitimacy and voice in international 
policy processes such as COP21, with 
active participation of local govern-
ment associations. New international 
city networks are sharing these experi-
ences at the subnational level, and 
their presence at the COP 21 meeting 
was substantial. These new networks 
may be a significant component of the 
possible global solutions to the chal-
lenges of urbanization. Future Earth, 
a 10-year global research initiative on 
sustainable development, identified 
urbanization and building sustainable 
cities as one of eight grand societal chal-
lenges and is expected to launch the 
Cities Knowledge Action Network later 
this year, which will provide a global 
research and engagement platform on 
urban issues.20
At the national level, China 
announced a National New-type 
Urbanization Plan in 2014 which, 
instead of being focused primarily 
upon the economy and infrastructure, 
is more people centered. And in 
Australia, a Minister for Cities has 
been appointed, emphasizing the criti-
cal role that federal government has to 
play in urban issues, especially in the 
areas of innovation and productivity. 
The national government’s role is 
critical in finding solutions, as urban 
policy can be strongly influenced by 
national priorities and strategies. The 
National New-type Urbanization Plan 
in China sets a clear target that the 
share of green buildings in new con-
structions in cities and towns needs to 
be 50 percent by 2020, which has the 
potential to significantly improve the 
energy and greenhouse gas emission 
profile of cities.
Within cities, the role of non-
governmental actors in achieving 
sustainability is increasingly recog-
nized. Universities have an essential role 
to play in promoting urban sustainabil-
ity by producing new knowledge and 
ideas and actively engaging with local 
government and communities.21 The 
collaboration between Singapore and 
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology 
in Zurich (ETH) is such an example (see 
box on page 59). The benefit of such col-
laboration is two-directional, with cities 
providing living labs for researchers 
to develop theories and perform rapid 
option testing, as well as benefiting 
from emerging innovations and tested 
options of innovative urban research.
On the social front, the increasing 
demand of growing urban populations 
for civic engagement and participa-
tion in decision-making processes is 
making itself felt in rapidly urbanizing 
cities. A good example is the increasing 
‘activism’ in cities such as Shanghai 
over the loss of heritage buildings 
and the clear-felling of trees for new 
development. Enhanced awareness and 
further empowerment of civil society 
is needed to push for and engage with 
inclusive governance practices.
Various forms of social, techno-
logical, and design innovations and 
experimentation are burgeoning 
in cities, and solutions proven else-
where are being adapted and taking 
root in cities. As part of the Energy 
Efficiency Improvement program, the 
Australian Capital Territory recently 
conducted energy saving house calls, 
which involved a technician visiting 
households door to door, changing 
all the light bulbs and downlights to 
energy-saving light bulbs, installing 
door seals, and setting up standby 
power controllers that turn off televi-
sions after a certain amount of time. 
This news was shared via social media 
by ordinary citizens and met with 
pleasant surprise. The EEI scheme 
mandates the electricity company to 
bear the cost. And it is encouraging 
to see that many such schemes are 
emerging in rapidly growing cities. The 
Aaron Reiss / Freedom House
Migrant laborers, known as China’s ‘floating population,’ face constant discrimination, economic hardship,
and a lack of access to basic public services in the cities that they work in. Here plain-clothes construction
laborers from the countryside are seen working in Guangzhou.
www.thesolutionsjournal.org|May-June 2016|  Solutions  |61
Bus Rapid Transit system developed in 
Curitiba has now taken root in many 
Asian cities such as Jakarta, Beijing, 
and Guangzhou. The bicycle renting 
system in Hangzhou City is not an 
innovation in itself, but over 400,000 
daily users makes it significant. Studies 
show such urban sustainability experi-
mentations can play a significant role 
in sustainability.23
There is still a long way to go in 
terms of truly embedding sustain-
able principles in urban policy 
and practice. In particular, a closer 
collaboration between the research 
community and urban policy makers 
and practitioners is called for to 
achieve a better understanding of 
urban systems as well as how to trans-
late such understanding into informed 
urban policy making and practice. 
World Economic Forum / Sikarin Fon Thanachaiary
Peter Edwards, Director of the Singapore-ETH Centre and Future Cities Laboratory speaks at the World Economic Forum - Annual Meeting of the New Champions
in Dalian, China in 2015.
References
1.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social 
Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization
Prospects: The 2014 Revisions, Highlights (United 
Nations, New York, 2014).
2.  Norman, B. and S. Smith. Cities in Future Earth: A
Summary of Key Considerations (Australian Academy 
of Science, Canberra, 2014).
3.  Bai, X., J. Chen, and P. Shi. Landscape urbanization 
and economic growth in China: Positive feedbacks 
and sustainability dilemmas. Environmental Science
and Technology 46(1) (2012): 132–9.
4.  World Bank. East Asia’s changing urban landscape: 
measuring a decade of spatial growth. World Bank 
Group [online] (2015) http://www.worldbank.org/
en/topic/urbandevelopment/publication/east-asias-
changing-urban-landscape-measuring-a-decade-of-
spatial-growthCached.
5.  Potts, D. The slowing of sub-Saharan Africa’s 
urbanization: evidence and implications for urban 
livelihoods. Environment and Urbanization 21(1) 
(2009): 253–9.
6.  Bai, X., P. Shi, and Y. Liu. Realizing China’s urban 
dream. Nature 509(8) (2014): 158–60.
7.  Chen, Z. et al. China tackles the health effects of air 
pollution. The Lancet 382(9909) (2013): 1959–60.
8.  Forecast for heavy air pollution of Beijing and 
Hebei. Ministry of Environmental Protection and 
China Meteorological Administration [online] (18 
December 2015) http://www.cma.gov.cn/en2014/
weather/Warnings/.
9.  Ahmad, K. Pollution cloud over south Asia is 
increasing ill health. The Lancet 360(9332) (2002): 
549.
10. Grubler, A. et al. Urban energy systems. Global
Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future
(2012): 1307–1400.
11. Seto, K.C. et al. Human Settlements, Infrastructure 
and Spatial Planning in Climate Change 2014:
Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of 
Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report 
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 
(eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge University 
Press, Cambridge, 2014).
12. Revi, A. et al. Towards transformative adaptation in 
cities: the IPCC’s fifth assessment. Environment and
Urbanization 26(1) (2014): 11–28.
62  |  Solutions  |  May-June 2016 |www.thesolutionsjournal.org
13. Norman, B. and S. Smith. Cities in Future Earth: A
Summary of Key Considerations (Australian Academy 
of Science, Canberra, 2014).
14. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social 
Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization 
Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (United 
Nations, New York, 2014).
15. Liu, Y., S. Lu, and Y. Chen. Spatio-temporal change 
of urban–rural equalized development patterns in 
China and its driving factors. Journal of Rural Studies
32 (2013): 320–330.
16. Bai, X., P. Shi, and Y. Liu. Realizing China’s urban 
dream. Nature 509(8) (2014): 158–60.
17. Klein, N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the
Climate (Simon & Schuster, New York, 2014).
18. Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding 
human development on a changing planet. Science
347 (2015): 1259855.
19. Bai, X. 10 ways to make our cities liveable by 2030. 
The World Economic Forum [online] (2015) 
https://www.weforum.org/agenda /2015/09/10-key-
steps-to-make-our-cities-liveable-by-2030/.
20. Future Earth [online] (2016) http://www.futureearth.
org/.
21. Trencher, G., X. Bai, and J. Evans et al. University 
partnerships for co-designing and co-producing 
urban sustainability. Global Environmental Change:
Part A - Human and Policy Dimensions 28 (2014): 
153–65.
22. Townsend, A. Making Sense of the New Urban 
Science. New York University Rudin Center for 
Transportation Policy and Management [online]
(2015) http://www.citiesofdata.org/wp-content/
uploads/2015/04/Making-Sense-of-the-New-
Science-of-Cities-FINAL-2015.7.7.pdf.
23. Bai, X., B. Roberts, and J. Chen. Urban 
sustainability experiments in Asia: patterns and 
pathways. Environmental Science & Policy 13(4) 
(2010): 312–25.
BxHxTxCx
The heavily polluted Ciliwung River in Jarkarta, Indonesia. A research team from the Singapore-ETH Centre have developed design scenarios to revitalize the
river as a green corridor.
... 1 1. Australian cities are growing in size, bringing many new challenges including managing urban growth in the context of climate change. ...
... Cities consume 75% of the world's energy use and produce more than 76% of all carbon. 1 Thus, cities are major contributors to climate change but they are also highly vulnerable to the risks, especially in coastal locations. Preparing cities to be 'climate ready' will be critical to minimising risk for urban communities and, in the longer term, to improving urban resilience to the projected impacts. ...
Article
Full-text available
1. Australian cities are growing in size, bringing many new challenges including managing urban growth in the context of climate change. Projected population growth in Australia is from 24 million at present to 40 million by 2050, and the vast majority of these people will live in our large urban centres. 2. Preparing cities to be 'climate ready' is critical to minimising risk for urban communities and, in the longer term, improving urban resilience to projected climate change impacts. Effective collaboration between policy makers, city planners and emergency services will facilitate development of appropriate urban disaster prevention strategies. 3. Climate change impacts on cities include more heatwaves, extreme rainfall and intense cyclones, harsher fire weather and more severe storm surge associated with sea level rise. The impacts of such changes on the built environment and major infrastructure (transport, energy) will have immediate and damaging effects on urban communities, the urban environment and a city's productivity. 4. Adaptation actions and policies will affect the built environment, urban ecosystems and energy, water and transport provision and infrastructure. Adaptation will require and involve actions by all levels of government and engagement with the private sector. Actions will range from policies on national critical infrastructure, to developing capital city plans to designing and building more localised 'climate smart precincts'. 5. The future stresses and impacts facing large urban centres are multifaceted and will require an integrated approach to long-term planning strategies in order to minimise risks to urban communities. This need for integration may have implications for future urban governance arrangements, including defining the roles of each level of government in developing 'climate ready cities'. Climate ready cities NCCARF's evidence-based Policy Information Briefs address key challenges to effective adaptation to Australia's variable and changing climate. They provide high-level policy advice designed for use by policy-makers at Commonwealth and State level. This Brief addresses the challenge of adapting Australia's major cities to be 'climate ready'. It was developed through a consultation workshop in Adelaide together with extensive exchange with relevant stakeholders and experts.
... Generally, more people together means more efficiency (Estok & Chou, 2017). For this reason, sustainable cities can function as a central platform to address the great challenges of climate change (Romero-Lankao et al., 2018), resource scarcity and rapid population growth (Bai, Norman & Edwards, 2016). Through regulations, urban centres are capable of having sustainable urban services, implementing eco-efficiency, developing intelligent systems using clean technology, reducing CO 2 emissions, altering the intensity of future global climate change (Pincetl, 2017) and regenerating their own environment. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The scientific community has identified the beginning of a new geological era, referred to as the Anthropocene, generated by the irrefutable impact of humans on the environment. One of the fundamental processes originating in this era is contemporary urbanisation, which has transformed the planet and brought about serious consequences insofar as the deterioration of the environment. This chapter entails a synthetic and theoretical approach to the relationship between urbanisation and the new era brought about by humans, including the corresponding impact and risks, with proposed future mitigation strategies. A deductive method is applied through the study of recently published bibliographic references and reflections by the authors. The results of this study show that the scale, territorial scope, manner and function of contemporary urbanisation have accelerated the changes in the physical and functional structure of cities. This process has caused serious consequences on the quality of life of the residents therein, land artificialisation, resource consumption, natural environments and climate change. This situation presents us with pressing challenges that need to be urgently addressed regarding the present and future of our cities and, with them, humanity and our planet. Our habitats, infrastructures and transportation systems must preserve the environment, not ruin it. To do so, it has become essential and urgent to design regenerative urban policies applied with good governance. The central conclusion, however, is the need to establish a new paradigm based on cities that are truly intelligent, resilient and sustainable. Cities must make a transition, a regeneration, towards human wellbeing with less impact on this new Anthropocene epoch. For this reason, the present text provides a state of the question raised and possible solutions, a set of problems and answers of particular interest to academics, professionals and citizens in general.
... Various experiments incubated in cities can be scaled up for broad transition 25,[38][39][40][41] . The concept of urban sustainability experiments can be understood in two layers: first, a city as a whole can be considered a sustainability experiment when examining its role in enabling a national/international transition; second, cities can be seen as an incubator or lab for experimentation 42,43 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Hydrogen energy from renewables has the potential to address climate challenges, and technological advancements are vital for driving this energy transition. Globally, an increasing number of cities are actively adopting hydrogen strategies. The literature on the urban sustainability transition primarily focuses on policy innovations for technology adoption, while the role of cities in enabling technological innovation is underexplored. Here, we address this gap by analyzing 122 policy documents from 39 Chinese cities with hydrogen plans by using qualitative content analysis methods. The findings reveal myriad and critical roles of cities in fostering technological innovations in an emergent hydrogen economy via targeted policy support and investment in desired technologies. By moving ahead of the national government, these early movers play a critical role in creating early momentum and laying the foundation for future scale transition. Our findings also point to a clear need for these bottom-up initiatives to be better guided and channeled toward clean hydrogen development, as the lack of upper-level policy guidance can lead to diversified priorities and outcomes. Our findings call for renewed research and policy attention to the proactive role of cities in technological innovation and the sustainability transition and they stress the importance of engaging cities in hydrogen economy development nationally and internationally.
... However, the major impediment to outspread regenerative urban transformations is cultural (as cited by Newman et al. 2018). Thusly to escape from the paradox of culture, the sustainable city requires a strategic transition, a shift that drives it as a central support in achieving the major challenges of climate changehuman population growth and resource shortage (Bai et al., 2016) Cities must enhance such urban transitions in the interest of becoming regenerative and sustainable. ...
Research Proposal
Full-text available
The unprecedented futures that await our planet in the Anthropocene, render pre-eminent challenges to the governance of cities, which are compelled to be approached in more effective and adequate ways than the prevailing sustainable development movement suggests. This paper discourses about key challenges and paradoxes associated with the three pillars of this notion of sustainability-economy, environment, and social equality-and furthermore promotes transformational pathways and processes from recent trends in urban theory and governance, which can lead decision-making to more optimistic urban futures.
... However, the pathways to meet the objectives of these agreements are not clearly set out, so some possible mechanisms are offered below. Sustainable cities can function as a central plank in addressing the grand challenges of climate changeresource scarcity and rapid population growth (Bai et al., 2016) -but the next agenda will require cities to go beyond this sustainability transition to being regenerative (Girardet, 2015;. This article suggests how cities can scale up such urban transitions to become regenerative. ...
Article
Full-text available
The emerging ‘grand challenges’ of climate change, resource scarcity and population growth present a risk nexus to cities in the Anthropocene. This article discusses the potential that rapid urbanisation presents to help mitigate these risks through large-scale transitions if future urban development is delivered using evidence-based policies that promote regenerative urban outcomes (e.g. decarbonising energy, recycling water and waste, generating local food, integrating biodiversity). Observations from an Australian case study are used to describe urban governance approaches capable of supporting regenerative urbanism. The regenerative urbanism concept is associated with macro-scale urban and transport planning that shapes different urban fabrics (walking, transit, automobile), as the underlying infrastructure of each fabric exhibits a different performance, with automobile fabric being the least regenerative. Supporting urban systems based upon regenerative design principles at different scales (macro, meso and micro) can deliver deep and dramatic outcomes for not just reducing the impact of the grand challenges but turning them into regenerative change. In combination, these approaches form the cornerstone of regenerative cities that can address the grand challenges of the Anthropocene, while simultaneously improving livability and urban productivity to foster human flourishing.
Article
Full-text available
By 2036, a much warmer environment has engulfed Asia, bringing major headaches for governments and community leaders. Despite scientists warning of the impending climate change 20 years ago, there had been only a slow awakening to the magnitude and scale of change about to hit both coastal and inland communities. As predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2014, more extreme weather, flooding, subsidence, storms, drought, fire, dust and sand storms affected have communities throughout Asia, leading to mass migration, social unrest and increased poverty. No nation or community escaped the impact of climate change, which unfairly hit the poor, who are often located on " marginal " lands and coastal areas. As the years went by, urban growth escalated throughout Asia and the global south. The early predictions of science fiction dreamers were realized with mega cities joining to create never ending urban corridors stretching across nations stemming from Shanghai and Tokyo to New Delhi and Jakarta. At the same time, major change was occurring across Asia. Urbanization and economic development on a grand scale combined to create a rising middle class, greater citizen engagement, technological change, smart cities and connectivity like never before imagined.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Chapter
Full-text available
More than 50% of the global population already lives in urban settlements and urban areas are projected to absorb almost all the global population growth to 2050, amounting to some additional three billion people. Over the next decades the increase in rural population in many developing countries will be overshadowed by population flows to cities. Rural populations globally are expected to peak at a level of 3.5 billion people by around 2020 and decline thereafter, albeit with heterogeneous regional trends. This adds urgency in addressing rural energy access, but our common future will be predominantly urban. Most of urban growth will continue to occur in small- to medium-sized urban centers. Growth in these smaller cities poses serious policy challenges, especially in the developing world. In small cities, data and information to guide policy are largely absent, local resources to tackle development challenges are limited, and governance and institutional capacities are weak, requiring serious efforts in capacity building, novel applications of remote sensing, information, and decision support techniques, and new institutional partnerships. While 'megacities' with more than 10 million inhabitants have distinctive challenges, their contribution to global urban growth will remain comparatively small. Energy-wise, the world is already predominantly urban. This assessment estimates that between 60–80% of final energy use globally is urban, with a central estimate of 75%. Applying national energy (or GHG inventory) reporting formats to the urban scale and to urban administrative boundaries is often referred to as a ‘production’ accounting Approach and underlies the above GEA estimate. This contrasts to a ‘consumption’ accounting approach that pro-rates associated energy uses per unit of urban consumer expenditures, thus allocating energy uses to urban consumers irrespective of the form energy is used (direct or embodied energy) or its location (within or outside a city’s administrative boundary). Available consumption-based energy accounts for cities are too limited (estimates exist for only a handful of megacities) to allow generalization but it is highly likely that urban energy use under a consumption accounting approach approximates the urban share in the world GDP, estimated by this assessment to be some 80%. There is great heterogeneity in urban energy-use patterns as revealed by this assessment drawing together a novel urban energy use data set. In many developing countries, urban dwellers use substantially more final energy per capita than their rural compatriots. This primarily reflects their much higher average urban incomes. Conversely, in many industrialized countries per capita final energy use of city dwellers is often lower than the national average, which reflects the effects of compact urban form, settlement types (multi- versus single-family dwellings) and availability and/or practicability of public transport infrastructure systems compared with those in the suburban or rural sprawl. The few available data, however, suggest that urban energy use in high-income countries is not substantially different from the national average when using a consumption-based accounting approach, whereas in low-income countries the urban-rural energy difference is likely to be even larger under this alternative energy accounting method. This Assessment concludes that both accounting methodologies provide complementary, valuable information to inform urban policy decisions. However, because of complexities in systems boundaries and accounting, urban studies need to adhere to high standards in terms of clarity and documentation of the terminology, methodology, and documentation of underlying energy data used.
Article
Full-text available
The planetary boundaries framework defines a safe operating space for humanity based on the intrinsic biophysical processes that regulate the stability of the Earth system. Here, we revise and update the planetary boundary framework, with a focus on the underpinning biophysical science, based on targeted input from expert research communities and on more general scientific advances over the past 5 years. Several of the boundaries now have a two-tier approach, reflecting the importance of cross-scale interactions and the regional-level heterogeneity of the processes that underpin the boundaries. Two core boundaries—climate change and biosphere integrity—have been identified, each of which has the potential on its own to drive the Earth system into a new state should they be substantially and persistently transgressed.
Article
Full-text available
According to data from the most recent inter-census period, some sub-Saharan African countries are now urbanizing very slowly. Actual decreases in the level of urbanization are rare, but have been recorded for Zambia (where counter-urbanization began in the 1980s) and Côte d'Ivoire and Mali (where there is evidence of counter-urbanization during the 1990s). Countries where urbanization levels are stagnating or increasing very slowly, especially when considering large and medium-sized towns, include Benin, Mozambique, Senegal, Zimbabwe, Mauritania, Burkina Faso and Niger. The East African situation is more mixed, but growth rates in many large centres are around or below the national rate. For many urban centres there is evidence of increased circular migration, which has reduced the contribution of in-migration to urban growth. These trends are largely the result of declining economic opportunities in many urban areas, refl ecting crises in urban poverty and livelihood insecurity.
Book
The most important book yet from the author of the international bestseller The Shock Doctrine, a brilliant explanation of why the climate crisis challenges us to abandon the core “free market” ideology of our time, restructure the global economy, and remake our political systems.In short, either we embrace radical change ourselves or radical changes will be visited upon our physical world. The status quo is no longer an option. In This Changes Everything Naomi Klein argues that climate change isn’t just another issue to be neatly filed between taxes and health care. It’s an alarm that calls us to fix an economic system that is already failing us in many ways. Klein meticulously builds the case for how massively reducing our greenhouse emissions is our best chance to simultaneously reduce gaping inequalities, re-imagine our broken democracies, and rebuild our gutted local economies. She exposes the ideological desperation of the climate-change deniers, the messianic delusions of the would-be geoengineers, and the tragic defeatism of too many mainstream green initiatives. And she demonstrates precisely why the market has not—and cannot—fix the climate crisis but will instead make things worse, with ever more extreme and ecologically damaging extraction methods, accompanied by rampant disaster capitalism. Klein argues that the changes to our relationship with nature and one another that are required to respond to the climate crisis humanely should not be viewed as grim penance, but rather as a kind of gift—a catalyst to transform broken economic and cultural priorities and to heal long-festering historical wounds. And she documents the inspiring movements that have already begun this process: communities that are not just refusing to be sites of further fossil fuel extraction but are building the next, regeneration-based economies right now. Can we pull off these changes in time? Nothing is certain. Nothing except that climate change changes everything. And for a very brief time, the nature of that change is still up to us.
Article
Local implementation and public scrutiny will make or break the government’s urbanization strategy.