PresentationPDF Available

Enhance Research Visibility by Tracking Citations

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Congratulation, you published a paper. Has anyone read it? or Cited it? Citation tracking is used to discover how many times a particular article has been cited by other articles. Citation counts are not perfect. They are influenced by a number of factors. Review articles are sometimes more often cited than their quality would warrant. Poor quality papers can be cited while being criticized or refuted. In this workshop, I will explain about the advantages of ”Citation Tracking” and introduced some “Research Tools” for improving the research impact and citations by “Tracking Citations”.
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
Enhance Research
Visibility by Tracking
Citations
aleebrahim@um.edu.my
@aleebrahim
www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009
http://scholar.google.com/citations
Nader Ale Ebrahim, PhD
Visiting Research Fellow
Research Support Unit
Centre for Research Services
Research Management & Innovation Complex
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
1st June 2016
3rd SERIES OF INTRODUCTORY WORKSHOP ON:
Strategies to Enhance Research
Visibility, Impact & Citations
Nader Ale Ebrahim, PhD
=====================================
Research Support Unit
Centre for Research Services
Research Management & Innovation Complex
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009
http://scholar.google.com/citations
All of my presentations are available online at:
https://figshare.com/authors/Nader_Ale_Ebrahim/100797
Link to this presentation: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3407128.v1
Read more:
1. Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective
Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-99. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n11p93
2. Ale Ebrahim, Nader. "Optimize Your Article for Search Engine." University of Malaya Research Bulletin 2.1 (2014): 38-39.
Abstract
Abstract: Congratulation, you published a paper. Has anyone
read it? or Cited it? Citation tracking is used to discover how
many times a particular article has been cited by other
articles. Citation counts are not perfect. They are influenced by a
number of factors. Review articles are sometimes more often
cited than their quality would warrant. Poor quality papers can be
cited while being criticized or refuted. In this workshop, I will
explain about the advantages of "Citation Tracking" and
introduced some Research Tools for improving the research
impact and citations by Tracking Citations”.
Keywords: H-index, Improve citations, Research tools,
Bibliometrics, Research Visibility, Citation Tracking
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency
Journal Reputation and Impact: publishing a paper in a journal based on disciplinary reputatation or with a high
impact factor is the most well known way of getting your paper cited. But there are many other things a scholar can do
to promote his or her work and make it easy for others to find.
Utilize Open Access Tools: Open Access journals tend to be cited more than non open access. Deposit your paper in
a repository such as Scholars Archive here on campus or a disciplinary repository. Share your detailed research data in
a repository.
Standarize Identifying Info: try to use the same name throughout your career as well as the name of your affiliated
insitution. Using common "official" names will allow for consistency and easy retrieval of your work by author or
affiliation.
Bring Colleagues on Board: team-authored articles are cited more frequently, as does publishing with international
authors. Working cross-or inter-disciplinarily helps as well.
Beef Up That Paper: use more references, publish a longer paper. Also papers which are published elsewhere after
having been rejected are cited more frequently.
Beyond Peer-Reviewed Original Research: Write a review paper. Present a working paper. Write and disseminate
web-based tutorials on your topic.
Search Optimization: use keywords in the abstract and assign them to the manuscript. Use descriptive titles that
utilize the obvious terms searchers would use to look for your topic, avoiding questions in the title. Select a journal that
is indexed in the key library databases for your field.
Market Yourself: create a key phrase that describes your research career and use it. Update your professional web
page and publication lists frequently. Link to your latest and greatest article in your professional email signature file.
Utliize Social Media: Use author profiles such as ResearcherID and ORCID. Contribute to Wikipedia, start a blog
and/or podcast, join academic social media sites.
From: Ebrahim, N.A., et al. (2013). Effective strategies for increasing citation frequency. International Education
Studies, 6(11), 93-99. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n11p93
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Top 10 authors with the highest
profile view counts on ResearchGate
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016). The counting house, measuring those who count: Presence of
Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley, & Twitter.
EC3 Reseach Group: Evaluación de la Ciencia y de la Comunicación Científica Universidad de Granada and Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (Spain), In
Progress,. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4814.4402
Research Tools Mind Map
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
How can I attract attention to my
work?
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source ttps://staticaltmetric.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2016/01/Promoting-your-research-tips-and-tricks.pdf
Citation tracking
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://guides.main.library.emory.edu/c.php?g=49965&p=324017
Calculate Your Academic Footprint
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
You want to see how your original article has been
received and discussed in the literature
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Determining the interdisciplinary
value of a particular study
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Citation tracking is an excellent means of identifying the
response of the academic community to individual articles.
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
A particularly useful means for
evaluating a study's "impact"
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
The importance of citation tracking
The standard tool used in citation tracking is a citation
index. Citation indexes allow you to search the academic
literature in ways that show the progress of academic
debate in your field. With a citation index, you can easily
identify the most influential articles, and the leading
academics in your field. You can track backwards (using
lists of cited articles) and forwards (using lists of articles
which cite a particular article). This means that you can
determine the position of academic debate at any time in
the past.
See More at: http://www.une.edu.au/library/find/eskillsplus/literature/citation.php
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Google Scholar Citations
Google Scholar Citations provide a
simple way for authors to keep track
of citations to their articles. You can
check who is citing your publications,
graph citations over time, and
compute several citation metrics.
Source: https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Keeping up-to-date
What is an alert service?
Many journal databases and book publishers offer free alert
services. These are an effective means of keeping track of the
latest research.
Alert services come in different forms. The most common
include:
a search alert. This is a saved search which alerts you when a
book or article that matches your search terms is published.
a TOC (Table of Contents) alert. Such an alert notifies you when
a new issue of a journal is published, and provides you with the
issue's table of contents.
a citation alert. This advises you when a new article cites a
particular work.
Most alert services are email-based. An increasing number are
now offered as an RSS feed. If you are just beginning, you might
like to try email alerts first. These are generally easier to create.
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
It is not vanity but a necessity to
set up Google alerts
(http://www.google.com/alerts) so
you can automatically keep an eye
on your developing presence and
follow your online
footprint and shadow.
Source: http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/5/5d/Online_Visibility_Guidelines.pdf
Keeping up-to-date
Create a Google Alert
Enter the topic you wish to monitor.
Search terms:
Type:
How often:
Email length:
Your email:
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Keeping up-to-date
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Monitor impact of social media
Alternative metrics
Download statistics, social media mentions,
mainstream media mentions
Timeliness
Evidence of reach beyond academia
Measures for a diversity of research outputs
Tools including
Altmetric , ImpactStory, Plum Analytics
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://www.slideshare.net/ucclibrarybibliometrics/citation-impact-introduction
Altmetric bookmarklet for Chrome, Firefox and Safari
http://www.altmetric.com/bookmarklet.php
SAGE Open Cited Articles
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Impact Story
is an open-source,
web-based tool that helps researchers
explore and share the diverse impacts of all
their research productsfrom traditional
ones like journal articles, to emerging
products like blog posts, datasets, and
software.
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://impactstory.org/about
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Citation tracking
Citation tracking in Web of Science
Citation tracking in Scopus
Citation tracking in Google Scholar
Other citation sources
JSTOR
ProQuest
ScienceDirect
SpringerLink
See More at: http://www.une.edu.au/library/find/eskillsplus/literature/citation.php
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Quick Guide to Citation Tracking Tools
Here is a summary of the information provided on Citation
Tracking Tools.
Quick Guide to Citation Tracking Tools (Word.doc)
More detailed information is available about these tools:
Scopus
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Additional Resources Containing Citation Tracking data
See More at: http://library.uws.edu.au/measuringResearchImpact.php?case=quickguidectt
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: How to track citations Google Scholar vs. Web of Science
The number of citations to one of
my articles is too low.
The number of citations to one of my articles is too low. I know of
several articles citing it that are not included in the list of citations.
What I can do to help fix this?
Your "Cited by" counts come from the Google Scholar index. You can change the
articles in your profile, but citations to them are computed and updated automatically
as we update Google Scholar.
To change the "Cited by" counts in your profile, you would need to have them
updated in Google Scholar. Google Scholar generally reflects the state of the web as
it is currently visible to our search robots and to the majority of users. If some of the
citations to your article are not included, chances are that the citing articles are not
accessible to our search robots or are formatted in ways that make it difficult for
our indexing algorithms to identify their bibliographic data or references.
To fix this, you'll need to identify the specific citing articles with indexing problems
and work with the publisher of these articles to make the necessary changes (see
our inclusion guidelines for details). For most publishers, it usually takes 6-9 months
for the changes to be reflected in Google Scholar; for very large publishers, it can
take much longer.
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://www.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html#citations
Google Scholar Inclusion
Guidelines for Webmasters
Manual configuration
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://www.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html#citations
Scopus Author Feedback Wizard
Use the Scopus Author Feedback Wizard to collect
all your Scopus records in one unique author
profile. To locate your documents as completely as
possible, please provide all the name variants
under which you have published. Once you have
submitted the author profile the Scopus Author
Feedback Team will process your request within 4
weeks.
Source: http://www.scopusfeedback.com/
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Author profile correction
Dear Nader Ale Ebrahim,
Thank you for contacting Scopus regarding your author profile correction. We are pleased to inform
you that your requested profile correction has been fully processed and your updated profile can be
viewed at http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=22974706300
Should you have further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Kind regards,
Scopus Feedback
www.scopusfeedback.com
This email has been sent to you by Scopus®, a product of Elsevier B.V., Radarweg 29, 1043NX
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel.+31 20 485 3911.
© 2010 - 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of this
message or its contents, in any medium, is strictly prohibited. Scopus® is a registered trademark of
Elsevier B.V.
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
WEB OF KNOWLEDGE
FEEDBACK - citation correction
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Missing Citations
Spiros Zervos - Curriculum Vitae
Citations
Citations in total: 106
My profile in Google Scholar
Koulouris, A, Kyriaki-Manessi, D, Giannakopoulos, G & Zervos, S (2013). "Institutional repository
policies: Βest practices for encouraging self-archiving". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73,
769-776.
Cited in:
Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi, F., Gholizadeh, H., & Motahar, S. M. (2014). "Visibility
and citation impact". International Education Studies, 7(4), 120-125.
Koutras, N., & Bottis, M. (2014). "In Search of One Sole Institutional Repository in Greece: Adventures
and Solutions for an Integration of Repositories towards Bridging Digital Divide". American
International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(2), 119-124.
Vrana, R (2013). "Digital repositories of scientific information at the Croatian universities: Developing
the bridge towards e-science. Information Technology Interfaces (ITI)". Proceedings of the ITI 2013
35th International Conference, 145-150.
Mole, V, Chatzilia, M, Paraskevopoulos, K, Garoufallou, E & Siatri, R (2013). "Web-based Information
Literacy in an Academic Library: The Example of the Library of ATEI of Thessaloniki". Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 181-187.
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://users.teiath.gr/szervos/01_biografiko/cv_zervos_eng.htm
KNOWN CITATIONS
Prof. Luis M. Camarinha-Matos
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: http://www.uninova.pt/cam/cv/CVcamCit.PDF
Record Citation
Mind Map
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
My recent publications
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
Questions?
E-mail: aleebrahim@um.edu.my
Twitter: @aleebrahim
www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009
http://scholar.google.com/citations
Nader Ale Ebrahim, PhD
=====================================
Research Support Unit
Centre for Research Services
Research Management & Innovation Complex
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009
http://scholar.google.com/citations
RESEARCH SUPPORT UNIT (RSU)
CENTRE FOR RESEARCH SERVICES
RESEARCH MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION COMPLEX (IPPP)
UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
References
1. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Promote your research work on LinkedIn. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of
Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)”, University of Malaya: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3394906.v1
2. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). New systems for measuring research impact. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of
Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)”, University of Malaya: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3364240.v1
3. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Establish your expertise with a science blog. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of
Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)”, University of Malaya: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3185218.v1
4. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Optimize articles for search engine to improve research visibility. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research
Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)”, University of Malaya: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3122038.v1
5. Ale Ebrahim, Nader. "Optimize Your Article for Search Engine." University of Malaya Research Bulletin 2.1 (2014): 38-39
6. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Maximizing Articles Citation Frequency. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of
Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)”, University of Malaya: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1572226.v2
7. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Research Tools: Enhancing visibility and impact of the research. Retrieved from Computer Lab, Level 2, Institute of Graduate
Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2794237
8. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Research Tools and Citations. Retrieved from Computer Lab, Level 3, Block B.,APIUM, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2274181.v2
9. Ebrahim, N.A., et al. (2013). Effective strategies for increasing citation frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-
99. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n11p93
10. Akhavan, P., Ale Ebrahim, N., Fetrati, M. A., & Pezeshkan, A. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study.
Scientometrics 1-16. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x
11. Shakiba, M., Ale Ebrahim, N., Danaee, M., Bakhtiyari, K., & Sundararajan, E. (2016). A Comprehensive Comparison of Educational Growth within Four
Different Developing Countries between 1990 and 2012. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 6(3), 152-174. doi:10.7769/gesec.v6i3.486
12. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016). The counting house, measuring those who count: Presence of
Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley, &
Twitter. EC3 Reseach Group: Evaluación de la Ciencia y de la Comunicación Científica Universidad de Granada and Universidad Politécnica de
Valencia (Spain), In Progress,. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4814.4402
13. Müller, A. M., Ansari, P., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Khoo, S. (2015). Physical Activity and Aging Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal Of Aging And
Physical Activity In Press. doi:10.1123/japa.2015-0188
14. Maghami, M., Navabi Asl, S., Rezadad, M. i., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Gomes, C. (2015). Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Solar hydrogen Generation
Literature From 2001 to 2014. Scientometrics 105(2), 759-771. : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3
©2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Educational growth is a fundamental infrastructure factor required to achieve sustainable development. Therefore, evaluation and measurement of educational growth is essential for establishing a development road map. Because of this, there are many organizations and databases that work to capture academic trends and provide the general view of institute achievements. Web of Science and Scopus are the two most popular and scientific. In this paper, we define the important effective factors in educational growth and discuss them; we then compare these defined factors across four different developing countries: Brazil, Iran, Malaysia, and Turkey. As well as the comparisons, this paper uses the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient method to analyze the factors and the strong or weak relationship between the factors are discussed. Keywords: Educational growth; Developing countries; Publication; Impact factor; Web of Science; Scopus.
Presentation
Full-text available
“Research Tools” can be defined as vehicles that broadly facilitate research and related activities. Scientific tools enable researchers to collect, organize, analyze, visualize and publicized research outputs. Dr. Nader has collected over 700 tools that enable students to follow the correct path in research and to ultimately produce high-quality research outputs with more accuracy and efficiency. It is assembled as an interactive Web-based mind map, titled “Research Tools”, which is updated periodically. “Research Tools” consists of a hierarchical set of nodes. It has four main nodes: (1) Searching the literature, (2) Writing a paper, (3) Targeting suitable journals, and (4) Enhancing visibility and impact of the research. Several free tools can be found in the child nodes. In this workshop some tools as examples from the part 4 (Enhancing visibility and impact of the research) will be described. The e-skills learned from the workshop are useful across various research disciplines and research institutions.
Article
Full-text available
Physical activity and aging research has burgeoned in the past few decades. Despite the increase in scholarly publications no attempts have been made to summarize the publication landscape and to identify works that had great impact to physical activity and aging research. We conducted a bibliometric analysis and collected publication data from 1980 to February 6, 2015 in the Web of Science Core Collection. Of the overall 9,935 publications most were published after 2007 and almost 60% were in the category of Geriatrics and Gerontology or Sport Sciences. Highly cited publications (n = 45) were mostly authored by researchers from US institutions and were quantitative in nature. Publications that reported on the associations or effects of physical activity on health in older adults made up 60% of the highly cited publications. We expect more scholars from various backgrounds and geographical regions to join the conversation on physical activity and aging.
Presentation
Full-text available
The number of citations a paper receives helps to determine the impact of your research. Even if your research is excellent, if no one finds your paper, it won’t be cited. Similar to a company for marketing a retail product, Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO) of your journal papers is important to market your research findings. ASEO is almost obligatory if you would like to increase readership of your papers, increase citations and acknowledgment and to create an overall stronger academic visibility, both offline and online. By optimizing your articles, you guarantee that your articles are indexed and gain a higher ranking in general and academic search engines, such as Google Scholar. This presentation provides guidelines on how to optimize scholarly literature for academic search engines like Google Scholar, in order to increase the article visibility and citations. The closer your paper is to the number one search result, the more likely it will be read.
Article
Full-text available
Due to the effect of citation impact on The Higher Education (THE) world university ranking system, most of the researchers are looking for some helpful techniques to increase their citation record. This paper by reviewing the relevant articles extracts 33 different ways for increasing the citations possibilities. The results show that the article visibility has tended to receive more download and citations. This is probably the first study to collect over 30 different ways to improve the citation record. Further study is needed to explore and expand these techniques in specific fields of study in order to make the results more precisely.
Article
This study provides an overview of the knowledge management literature from 1980 through 2014. We employ bibliometric and text mining analyses on a sample of 500 most cited articles to examine the impact of factors such as number of authors, references, pages, and keywords on the number of citations that they received. We also investigate major trends in knowledge management literature including the contribution of different countries, variations across publication years, and identifying active research areas and major journal outlets. Our study serves as a resource for future studies by shedding light on how trends in knowledge management research have evolved over time and demonstrating the characteristics of the most cited articles in this literature. Specifically, our results reveal that the most cited articles are from United States and United Kingdom. The most prolific year in terms of the number of published articles is 2009 and in terms of the number of citations is 2012. We also found a positive relationship between the number of publications’ keywords, references, and pages and the number of citations that they have received. Finally, the Journal of Knowledge Management has the largest share in publishing the most cited articles in this field.
Article
Solar hydrogen generation is one of the new topics in the field of renewable energy. Recently, the rate of investigation about hydrogen generation is growing dramatically in many countries. Many studies have been done about hydrogen generation from natural resources such as wind, solar, coal etc. In this work we evaluated global scientific production of solar hydrogen generation papers from 2001 to 2014 in any journal of all the subject categories of the Science Citation Index compiled by Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), Philadelphia, USA. Solar hydrogen generation was used as keywords to search the parts of titles, abstracts, or keywords. The published output analysis showed that hydrogen generation from the sun research steadily increased over the past 14 years and the annual paper production in 2013 was about three times 2010-paper production. The number of papers considered in this research is 141 which have been published from 2001 to this date. There are clear distinctions among author keywords used in publications from the five most high-publishing countries such as USA, China, Australia, Germany and India in solar hydrogen studies. In order to evaluate this work quantitative and qualitative analysis methods were used to the development of global scientific production in a specific research field. The analytical results eventually provide several key findings and consider the overview hydrogen production according to the solar hydrogen generation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The counting house, measuring those who count: Presence of Bibliometrics
  • A Martín-Martín
  • E Orduna-Malea
  • J M Ayllón
  • E D López-Cózar
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016). The counting house, measuring those who count: Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley, & Twitter. EC3 Reseach Group: Evaluación de la Ciencia y de la Comunicación Científica Universidad de Granada and Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (Spain), In Progress,. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4814.4402
Promote your research work on LinkedIn. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)
  • Ale Ebrahim
Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Promote your research work on LinkedIn. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP)", University of Malaya: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3394906.v1