... In other words, values are thought of as internal structures governing decision-making. Research findings indicate that (1) values impact decisionmaking and cognition (Sousa et al., 2012; see also, e.g., Bardi & Schwartz, 2003;Feather, 1995;Maio, 2010;Roccas & Sagiv, 2010;Rokeach, 1973;Schwartz et al., 2017;see Fritzsche & Oz, 2007, for a historical discussion) and vice versa (Feldman-Stewart et al., 2012); (2) values are tied to personal, moral, and social identity (Arieli et al., 2014;Brewer & Roccas, 2001;Feldman et al., 2015;LeFavbre & Franke, 2013;Ruff & Fehr, 2014;Vecchione et al., 2016); (3) values can be changed by intervention (Arieli et al., 2014;Bardi & Goodwin, 2011;Feldman et al., 2015;Maio & Thomas, 2007) and certain facilitators (Feldman et al., 2015;Sousa et al., 2012;Vecchione et al., 2016); (4) values tend to be stable across situations and time (Arieli et al., 2014;Ring et al., 2020;Rokeach, 1973Rokeach, , 1979Schwartz, 1992;Vecchione et al., 2016); (5) values tend to exhibit similar characteristics and links across cultures (Feldman et al., 2015;Schwartz & Bardi, 2001); and (6) values can be tied to the longterm goal of flourishing (Fritzsche & Oz, 2007;LeFavbre & Franke, 2013;Ring et al., 2020). In other words, values have a widespread impact on decisionmaking and behavior, can be changed to align with a prosocial lifestyle, and, as a target for intervention, may not only share the benefits of a cognitivebehavioral approach, but also add the benefits of generalizability and stability of decision-making and behavior across varying environments. ...