ArticlePDF Available

Breaking out of the echo chamber: missed opportunities for genetics at conservation conferences

DOI:10.1007/s10531-016-1159-x
Authors:
Helen R Taylor at Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (RZSS)
Helen R Taylor
Kylie Soanes at University of Melbourne
Kylie Soanes
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

Genetic approaches have proven useful for addressing various conservation problems, but genetics remains poorly integrated into conservation practice. Multidisciplinary conservation conferences present excellent opportunities for bridging the conservation-genetics gap and facilitating cross-disciplinary projects. We hypothesize that there is a tendency for presentations featuring genetic approaches to be siloed into approach specific sessions, creating an “echo chamber”; geneticists are left talking amongst themselves, hindering collaboration across disciplines. To test this, we reviewed abstracts from the past six Society for Conservation Biology conferences and assessed how presentations featuring genetics/genomics were distributed throughout the respective programs. We found that: the segregation of presentations featuring genetics varied widely between conferences (22–78 %); that no other method or approach was segregated to the same degree; and that the vast majority (99 %) of presentations featuring genetics had broader applications that made them appropriate for other sessions. We argue that segregating genetics at conservation conferences in this way is unhelpful and serves to strengthen the idea that genetics is not relevant to a wider conservation audience. We recommend that; (1) conference organisers endeavour to facilitate the integration of genetics into sessions based on the conservation questions addressed, rather than the methods used to address them; and (2) geneticists make the practical application of their work clear at abstract submission and during presentations. These recommendations are not novel, but our data illustrate a clear need for them to be implemented to better facilitate integration of genetic research that will benefit conservation outcomes.
Content uploaded by Helen R Taylor
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Helen R Taylor on Jun 20, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
  • A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
  • Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Biodiversity and Conservation
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
... Conservation scientists planning symposia focused on a specific species, conservation issue, or management approach could also target a physiologist as a potential speaker, where relevant. Recently, it was noted that conservation genetics, another multi-disciplinary field, has been facing presentations being siloed into topic-specific sessions at conservation conferences, creating an environment where many conservation scientists who work outside of genetics likely do not get exposed to new techniques and their potential to aid in their questions (Taylor and Soanes 2016). When incorporating more physiological approaches, we echo (Taylor and Soanes 2016) in stating that presentations should focus not just on the technique, but on the conservation problems that can be solved by employing it to ensure as diverse an audience as possible. ...
... Recently, it was noted that conservation genetics, another multi-disciplinary field, has been facing presentations being siloed into topic-specific sessions at conservation conferences, creating an environment where many conservation scientists who work outside of genetics likely do not get exposed to new techniques and their potential to aid in their questions (Taylor and Soanes 2016). When incorporating more physiological approaches, we echo (Taylor and Soanes 2016) in stating that presentations should focus not just on the technique, but on the conservation problems that can be solved by employing it to ensure as diverse an audience as possible. ...
A call for more physiology at conservation conferences
Article
Full-text available
Scientific conferences are more impactful when they foster novel ideas, create new networks, and promote inter-disciplinary collaboration. The field of conservation physiology is inherently cross-disciplinary, representing the application of physiological techniques and knowledge to address conservation issues. Ideally, knowledge transfer comes from both directions: conservation biologists seek input on physiological techniques that can contribute to the success of their programs, and physiologists collaborate with conservation biologists to plan relevant applications for their work. To assess whether the level of integration between conservation and physiology has been increasing since the formal naming of the discipline of conservation physiology in 2006, we reviewed abstracts from conferences of three societies: Society for Conservation Biology (SCB), Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (SICB), and Society for Experimental Biology (SEB). Specifically, we searched for physiology-related keywords in abstracts from SCB meetings, and for conservation-related keywords in abstracts from SICB and SEB. Our results indicate that the percentage of presentations incorporating physiology at conservation meetings has remained relatively steady (2–3%). In contrast, the percentage of presentations citing conservation applications has been rising at both of the integrative biology societies’ meetings and has reached 4.4 and 7.9% at SICB and SEB, respectively. We provide suggestions for why there may be discrepancies between conference types and ways to encourage the presence of physiological topics at future conservation meetings.
View
... Whereas primary industry scientists respond to the needs of primary industry practitioners (i.e., plant and animal breeders, farmers, fishermen and loggers), conservation scientists respond to the needs of conservation practitioners (i.e., wildlife managers and policy makers; Gordon et al. 2014;Haig et al. 2016). Considering the research-implementation gap that has been discussed in conservation genetic and genomic literature (Knight et al. 2008;Laikre et al. 2010;Shafer et al. 2015;Taylor & Soanes 2016), researchers from conservation genetics and primary industry can collaborate on how to best communicate research needs and results between scientists and practitioners. In the policy arena, both conservation geneticists and primary industry scientists work to develop improved policy regarding the utilisation and ...
... All rights reserved. conferences in primary industry, conservation and genomics can strive to incorporate crosssector talks and break down organisational silos by minimising field-specific sessions, as proposed by Taylor & Soanes (2016) and practiced by cross-sector meetings like MapNet (see Box 3). We also challenge scientists in both primary industry and conservation to become good interdisciplinary mentors to promote a culture of interdisciplinary research. ...
Building strong relationships between conservation genetics and primary industry leads to mutually-beneficial genomic advances
Article
Full-text available
Several reviews in the past decade have heralded the benefits of embracing high-throughput sequencing tech- nologies to inform conservation policy and the manage- ment of threatened species, but few have offered practical advice on how to expedite the transition from conservation genetics to conservation genomics. Here, we argue that an effective and efficient way to navigate this transition is to capitalize on emerging synergies between conservation genetics and primary industry (e.g., agricul- ture, fisheries, forestry and horticulture). Here, we demonstrate how building strong relationships between conservation geneticists and primary industry scientists is leading to mutually-beneficial outcomes for both disci- plines. Based on our collective experience as collaborative New Zealand-based scientists, we also provide insight for forging these cross-sector relationships.
View
... There is indeed still a large gap between scientists working within the field of genetics and those dealing with conservation problems on the ground. Several studies identified this science policy gap (e.g., Hoban et al. 2013;Taylor and Soanes 2016) which is getting even more prominent when it comes to the field of genomics (Shafer et al. 2015). However, for many of the pressing conservation topics, genomic tools may be able to get us further than using classic neutral genetic approaches. ...
View
... There is indeed still a large gap between scientists working within the field of genetics and those dealing with conservation problems on the ground. Several studies identified this science policy gap (e.g., Hoban et al. 2013;Taylor and Soanes 2016) which is getting even more prominent when it comes to the field of genomics (Shafer et al. 2015). However, for many of the pressing conservation topics, genomic tools may be able to get us further than using classic neutral genetic approaches. ...
Landscape Genomics: Understanding Relationships Between Environmental Heterogeneity and Genomic Characteristics of Populations
Chapter
  • Nov 2017
Landscape genomics is a rapidly advancing research field that combines population genomics, landscape ecology, and spatial analytical techniques to explicitly quantify the effects of environmental heterogeneity on neutral and adaptive genetic variation and underlying processes. Landscape genomics has tremendous potential for addressing fundamental and applied research questions in various research fields, including ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. However, the unique combination of different scientific disciplines and analytical approaches also constitute a challenge to most researchers wishing to apply landscape genomics. Here, we present an introductory overview of important concepts and methods used in current landscape genomics. For this, we first define the field and explain basic concepts and methods to capture different hypotheses of landscape influences on neutral genetic variation. Next, we highlight established and emerging genomic tools for quantifying adaptive genetic variation in landscape genomic studies. To illustrate the covered topics and to demonstrate the potential of landscape genomics, we provide empirical examples addressing a variety of research question, i.e., the investigation of evolutionary processes driving population differentiation, the landscape genomics of range expanding species, and landscape genomic patterns in organisms of special interest, including species inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial environments. We conclude by outlining remaining challenges and future research avenues in landscape genomics.
View
Role of genomics and transcriptomics in selection of reintroduction source populations
Article
Full-text available
The use and importance of reintroduction as a conservation tool to return a species to its historical range where it has become extirpated will only increase as climate change and human development accelerate habitat loss and population extinctions. Although the number of reintroduction attempts has rapidly increased over the past two decades, the success rate is generally low. As a result of population differences in fitness-related traits and divergent responses to environmental stresses, there is a high likelihood for differential performance among potential source populations upon reintroduction. It is well known that population performance upon reintroduction is highly variable and it is generally agreed that selecting an appropriate source population is a critical component of a successful reintroduction. Conservation Genomics is an emerging field that addresses long-standing challenges in conservation biology, and the potential for using novel molecular genetic approaches to inform and improve conservation efforts is high. As the successful establishment and persistence of reintroduced populations is highly dependent on the standing genetic variation and environmental stress tolerance of the source population, we propose the application of conservation genomics/transcriptomics to guide reintroduction practices. Specifically, we propose estimating genetic diversity (standing genetic variation) for source populations using genome-wide functional loci to predict the potential for adaptation and using transcriptional profiling to measure expression response of fitness-related genes to environmental stresses as a proxy for acclimation (tolerance) capacity. Appropriate application of conservation genomics/transcriptomics has the potential to dramatically enhance reintroduction success in a time of rapidly declining biodiversity and accelerating environmental change. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
View
Reply to Garner et al
Article
Full-text available
The letter by Garner et al. [1] continued an important discussion regarding the role genomics might play in conservation biology. In general, we do not see a dichotomy between our point of view [2] and that put forth by Garner et al. [1]. At the heart of the issue is how to define an actual impact of genomics on applied conservation and find suitable ways to remove existing barriers limiting the use of genomics for managing wild populations. The promised gains of identifying adaptive loci and the genes underlying phenotypes [3,4] have in most systems not yet been realized and recent empirical work further highlights the challenges [5,6].
View
View
The Conservation Genetics Juggling Act: Integrating Genetics and Ecology, Science and Policy
Article
Full-text available
The field of conservation genetics, when properly implemented, is a constant juggling act integrating molecular genetics, ecology, and demography with applied aspects concerning managing declining species or implementing conservation laws and policies. This young field has grown substantially since the 1980's following development of the polymerase chain reaction and now into the genomics era. Our lab has “grown up” with the field, having worked on these issues for over three decades. Our multi-disciplinary approach entails understanding the behavior and ecology of species as well as the underlying processes that contribute to genetic viability. Taking this holistic approach provides a comprehensive understanding of factors that influence species persistence and evolutionary potential while considering annual challenges that occur throughout their life cycle. As a federal lab, we are often addressing the needs of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in their efforts to list, de-list or recover species. Nevertheless, there remains an overall communication gap between research geneticists and biologists who are charged with implementing their results. Therefore, we outline the need for a National Center for Small Population Biology to ameliorate this problem and provide organizations charged with making status decisions firmer ground from which to make their critical decisions.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
View
View
Genetic factors in threatened species recovery plans on three continents
Article
  • Oct 2016
Around the world, recovery planning for threatened species is being applied in an attempt to stem the current extinction crisis. Genetic factors linked to small population processes (eg inbreeding, loss of genetic diversity) play a key role in species viability. We examined how often genetic factors are considered in threatened species recovery planning. We selected recent species recovery plans from Europe (n = 110), North America (the US only; n = 100), and Australia (n = 108), and reviewed three broad categories of genetic data they address: population-genetic, fitness-related, and life-history data. We found that the host country, taxonomic group to which the species belonged, and several proposed management actions were important predictors of the inclusion of genetic factors. Notably, species recovery plans from the US were more likely to include genetic issues, probably due to legislative requirements. We recommend an international standard, similar to an IUCN Red List framework, that requires explicit consideration of genetic aspects of long-term viability.
View
Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity: Further Opportunities via Genomics. Response to Pimm et al
Article
In a recent article in TREE [1], Pimm et al. outlined some new technologies that may be used to tackle the global biodiversity crisis, and the issues and questions accompanying these advances. Their focus was on three specific challenges: monitoring individuals and their movements; collecting data on species occurrence and locations; and remote sensing of environmental drivers of biodiversity loss. Here, we broaden that discussion to encompass some of the rapidly evolving genomic technologies that appear likely to play important roles in addressing those same conservation challenges.
View
Genomics in Conservation: Case Studies and Bridging the Gap between Data and Application
Article
We agree with Shafer et al. [1] that there is a need for well-documented case studies of the application of genomics in conservation and management as well as increased communication between academics and natural resource managers. However, we challenge Shafer et al.’s [1] relatively pessimistic assertion that ‘conservation genomics is far from seeing regular application’. Here we illustrate by examples that conservation practitioners utilize more genomic research than is often apparent. In addition, we highlight the work of nonacademic laboratories [government and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)], some of which are not always well represented in peer-reviewed literature.
View
Systems integration for global sustainability
Article
  • Feb 2015
Global sustainability challenges, from maintaining biodiversity to providing clean air and water, are closely interconnected yet often separately studied and managed. Systems integration—holistic approaches to integrating various components of coupled human and natural systems—is critical to understand socioeconomic and environmental interconnections and to create sustainability solutions. Recent advances include the development and quantification of integrated frameworks that incorporate ecosystem services, environmental footprints, planetary boundaries, human-nature nexuses, and telecoupling. Although systems integration has led to fundamental discoveries and practical applications, further efforts are needed to incorporate more human and natural components simultaneously, quantify spillover systems and feedbacks, integrate multiple spatial and temporal scales, develop new tools, and translate findings into policy and practice. Such efforts can help address important knowledge gaps, link seemingly unconnected challenges, and inform policy and management decisions. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
View
Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice
Article
The global loss of biodiversity continues at an alarming rate. Genomic approaches have been suggested as a promising tool for conservation practice as scaling up to genome-wide data can improve traditional conservation genetic inferences and provide qualitatively novel insights. However, the generation of genomic data and subsequent analyses and interpretations remain challenging and largely confined to academic research in ecology and evolution. This generates a gap between basic research and applicable solutions for conservation managers faced with multifaceted problems. Before the real-world conservation potential of genomic research can be realized, we suggest that current infrastructures need to be modified, methods must mature, analytical pipelines need to be developed, and successful case studies must be disseminated to practitioners. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
View