ArticlePDF Available

Legally Unhappy: Psychological Distress in Legal Practitioners

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Occupational stress is of increasing importance due to increased demands for every occupation. A range of adverse health outcomes have been identified; psychological disorders are significant because they occur frequently and are often unrecognized. Of all professionals, lawyers form the highest rate of depression and are more likely to suffer from the depressive disorders. Aim: The primary objective of our study was to find out the levels of psychological distress in legal practitioners. The secondary objective was to compare these findings in males and females. Method: It was across sectional study. 50 lawyers of both sex of age 30-45 years and practicing since 10 years were selected as cases. Thorough clinical examination was done to rule out any major illness. Each participant was given DASS (Depression Anxiety Stress Score) questionnaire. Completed DASS data was tabulated and analyzed by SPSS software. Unpaired t test was applied for statistical significance. Results: Among the 50 cases, 36 cases were males and 14 were females. The levels of stress and anxiety was reported higher in the study. The females were showing higher stress than males which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The present study concluded that lawyers are at risk of psychological stress. The females lawyers were at more risk than the male lawyers.
Content may be subject to copyright.
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS)
e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 15, Issue 5 Ver. VII (May. 2016), PP 129-132
www.iosrjournals.org
DOI: 10.9790/0853-150507129132 www.iosrjournals.org 129 | Page
Legally Unhappy: Psychological Distress in Legal Practitioners
DrShete Anjali N1, Dr. K.D.Garkal2
Associate Professor, Physiology, Government Medical College, Aurangabad
Registrar, MUHS,Nashik, Maharashtra.
Abstract
Background: Occupational stress is of increasing importance due to increased demands for every occupation.
A range of adverse health outcomes have been identified; psychological disorders are significant because they
occur frequently and are often unrecognized. Of all professionals, lawyers form the highest rate of depression
and are more likely to suffer from the depressive disorders.
Aim: The primary objective of our study was to find out the levels of psychological distress in legal
practitioners. The secondary objective was to compare these findings in males and females.
Method: It was across sectional study. 50 lawyers of both sex of age 30-45 years and practicing since 10 years
were selected as cases. Thorough clinical examination was done to rule out any major illness. Each participant
was given DASS (Depression Anxiety Stress Score) questionnaire. Completed DASS data was tabulated and
analyzed by SPSS software. Unpaired t test was applied for statistical significance.
Results: Among the 50 cases, 36 cases were males and 14 were females. The levels of stress and anxiety was
reported higher in the study. The females were showing higher stress than males which was statistically
significant.
Conclusion: The present study concluded that lawyers are at risk of psychological stress. The females lawyers
were at more risk than the male lawyers.
Keywords: Legal Practitioners DASS 42 Psychological Distress
I. Introduction
Occupational stress is of increasing importance due to continuingstructural changes in the workplace
with both increasing demands and job securityimposed on employees. A range of adverse health outcomes have
been identified.Psychological disorders are significant because they occur frequently and are oftenunrecognized.
They can be accompanied by significant social morbidity.There areimportant implications for the lifestyle and
health of the employees and their families.The stress implied by various professions were studied; of which
most studied weremedical, engineers and teachers. In those; medical profession was having higher
stresslevels.(1)In a country where the depression rate is ten times higher todaythan it wasin the past (1) ; lawyers
sit at the unenviable zenith of the depressedprofessionals. Of all professions in the united states, lawyers suffer
from the highestrate of depression. They are more likely to suffer from major depressive disorders thanthe rest
of the professions.(2) Lawyers are also at a greater risk of heart disease,alcoholism and drug abuse than the
general population.(3)There were various studiesdone in other countries but, very less studies were seen in the
Indian lawyers.Today an increasing number of lawyers are experiencing burnouts,Insomnia, low productivity
and stress related illness(4) due to lack of balance inpersonal and professional lives. A psychosocial interplay
between personality, powerstatus and service and intellectual challenges forms the career dilemma of
lawyersconflicts.Job satisfaction has been defined as the positive orientation of anindividual towards the work
role which he is presently occupying and the pleasurableemotional state resulting from the appraisal of one‟s job
as achieving or facilitatingone‟s values. It is basically an individual matter and refers to what one expects
fromhis/her job and when there is mismatch between what is expected and what is receiveddissatisfaction
occurs. Due to high job demands there is significant impact of stress onthe lawyer‟s mental and physical health
which in turn leads to stress.(5)Some degree of stress is the normal part of life and provides thestimulus to learn
and grow without an adverse effect on health. (6) But, when stress isintense continuous or repeated as is often the
case with occupational stress;ill healthcan result it can destroy quality of life and also affect family life. It can
lead toemotional reactions like depression, irritability, anxiety, fatigue withdrawal, and low selfesteem.
Physiological (heart burn, eating disorders) muscle pain and behavioralreactions like smoking ,drinking.(7)Very
few studies were seen in India and hence this study wasplanned to see the psychological distress in lawyers.
II. Method
50 lawyers of both sex practicing at High court Aurangabad,were selected . Thorough clinical history
and examination was done.Thelawyershaving any major disorder or with recent history of any incidence
affectinghis/her mental health were excluded. The details included age, gender, H/Omedications were
Legally Unhappy: Psychological Distress In Legal Practitioners
DOI: 10.9790/0853-150507129132 www.iosrjournals.org 130 | Page
recorded .A written consent was taken and completeconfidentiality was assured. A validated
(8)questionnaire DASS 42 was given to eachparticipant along with a standard preface explaining the
purpose of the study and was asked to fill.The DASS 42 scale described by Lovibond and Lovibond(9) isa
survey that measures the level of depression, anxiety and stress levels in anindividual. The structure of the
DASS is similar to the tripartite model of Clark andWatson (10)which conceptualizes depression and anxiety as
having unique distinguishingfeatures and some common symptoms as well. During the testing of the scale a
newfactor emerged that referred to difficulty in relaxing, nervous tension, irritability andagitation. This
difficulty was labeled as “Stress” by virtue of perceived similarity to thesymptoms of tension or stress
described.The DASS 42 has 14 items for each of thethree scales.Items3,5,10,13,16,17,21,24,26,31,34,37,38 and
42 form the depressionscale and assess dysphoria, hopelessness, deviation of life , self deprecation, lack
ofinterest or involvement and inertia. The anxiety scale has 14 items;2,4,7,9,15,19,20,23,25,28,30,36,40 and 41
which measures autonomic arousal, skeletalstress scale has items 1,6,8,11,12,14,18,22,27,29,32, 33,35 and 39
which quantifies thedifficulty in relaxing, nervous arousal and being easily upset or agitated or
irritable.Therespondentsrate the extent to which they have experienced the symptoms over theprevious week on
a four point rating scale.The sum of scores obtained from the 14items in each scale and the scale severity is
interpreted as shown in the table.
Table 1 :DASS severity levels
G R A D E S
D E P R E S S I O N
A N X I E T Y
S T R E S S
N O R M A L
0 - 9
0 - 7
0 - 1 4
M I L D
10- 1 3
8 - 9
15- 1 8
M O D E R A T E
14- 2 0
10- 1 4
19- 2 5
S E V E R E
21- 2 7
15- 1 9
26- 3 3
E X T R E M E S E V E R E
28+
20+
34+
The scale has been tested and found to possess excellent reliability,good validity and simple in
language and requires less time.(11)
III. Statistical Analysis
The data was analyzed and coded.Unpaired ttest was applied for comparing the variables.
IV. Result
A total of 50 lawyers were selected for the study.They were practicing since7-10 years.The age of the
lawyers was ranging between 30-45 years. Among the50; 36 were males and 14 were females.DASS
questionnaire was given to them.When we analyzed depressionscale,31 cases reported no evidence
ofdepression,7cases reported mild depression,7 moderate depression and 2 reportedextreme severe depression.
The mean depression score was 8.96+8.16 ( Table 2).The anxiety scale reported 22 normal cases. Among the
remaining ,5 reported mild,10 moderate,8 severe and 5 extreme severe cases of anxietylevels.The mean anxiety
levels was 8.12± 6.03 ( Table 2) Our studyreported 28 normal cases of stress scale.; 6 cases were having mild
stress, 10 werehaving moderate stress,4 cases were having severe stress and 2 reported extremesevere stress
levels. The mean stress level was 17.62±7.18 ( Table 2).We further grouped the cases into males and females
and analyzed the data.In males the depression score was 9.71±8.35,the anxiety score was 10.08±7.28.And the
stress score was 10.47±6.60. In females; the depression score was7.64±6.54,the anxiety score was 8.78±6.49,
the stress score was13.79±8.76.(Table 3).The difference in depression and anxiety was notstatistically
significant, but the stress levels were showing significant difference in males andfemales.
V. Discussion
Mental illness encompasses a variety of mental impairments that may affectindividual‟s thought,mood
or behavior. It also affects his/her ability to function psychologically,socially, occupationally or interpersonally.
A lawyers role is to advocate for his/her clients. Andlawyers have the duty to act competently maintain client
confidentiality, avoid client‟s adverseinterests and communicate with clients to keep them reasonably informed,
among other duties.Mental illness can affect a lawyers ability to abide these duties and provide professional
andcompetent representation. It can lead to decreased work performance, burning out and inability
to maintain ethical responsibilities and discipline.Our study reported an overall mild degree of anxiety and mild
stress levels in the lawyers. The depression levels were in normal range for overall sample. When we analyzed
according to gender difference, it was observed that there were higher levels of stress among females as
compared to male lawyers which was statistically significant. The depression and anxiety levels in female
lawyers were seen to be lower compared to male lawyers.
The results in our study shows that lawyers definitely suffer from stressful situations leading to
psychological disturbances. Lawyers are expected to heavy workloads . By it‟s nature, the profession is full of
Legally Unhappy: Psychological Distress In Legal Practitioners
DOI: 10.9790/0853-150507129132 www.iosrjournals.org 131 | Page
multiple sources of conflict and adversity. Lawyers have to deal with conflict and uncontrollable uncertainty
from clients, opposing council,other lawyers, insurance companies and judges, etc. lawyers feel stress and
body‟s stress response can contribute to the root of mental illness. (11)Legal profession gives little in turn in
terms for the years of hard labor and stress(12). Various studies on lawyers job satisfaction have turned out
different results. Some studies find lawyers are among unhappiest professionals, while others say they are
equally satisfied or dissatisfied as other workers.(13) A study found that 40% of lawyers were dissatisfied with
their jobs (14). In 2006, one survey found that 56% of lawyers were very satisfied with their jobs.(11) In 1990,
study by the National survey found the most common reasons for lawyers negative job experiences were not
much time for self‟ and „not much time for family‟ (15) According to Berman; lawyers experience many of these
risk factors at higher rates than general population.(16)Daicoff in 1977 found that increasing competition results
in stress and low jib satisfaction among lawyers. It was found that when lawyers have less work to do as
compared with their colleagues,then the situation ends with job dissatisfaction.(17) Kirti Patel in her study
concluded that high demand,low support at the workplace and inadequate recreation at the workplace
corroborates with the development of stress.(18)
In this study, gender was significantly influencing the stress levels. Several studies have shown that
females were more prone for emotional disturbances than males.(19,20)The femalelawyers have lessjobsatisfaction
and more stress and burnout than males.(21)In our study,the female lawyers showed a lower depression levels.
This may be due to the fact females are more likely report concern, stress due to self-expectation and tendency
to report symptoms.(20)
Despite the prevalence of mental illness in our society, there remains a stigma attached to mental
illness. Lawyers may choose not to seek treatment out of fear that may be diagnosed with a mental illness and
the fear what it could mean to their ability to practice law. Some lawyers choose to remain silent about their
diagnosed or undiagnosed mental illness at work.
VI. Conclusion
Lawyers suffer from higher degrees of stress and anxiety levels due to high stress of the profession.
Female lawyers were showing higher stress levels than male lawyers. The study also concluded that lawyers
have a high risk of substance abuse and face stigma in the workplace.
VII. Limitations
It was a cross sectional, questionnaire based study. Small sample size was a major factor of limitation.
Comparison with general population and other professions were not done. Factors contributing the stress levels
were not analyzed.
Acknowledgement
I want to thank my brother, AdvocateUmesh N. Shete; who helped me in communication with the
lawyers. Without his assistance it was difficult to collect the data. I would also thank all the lawyers who readily
accepted to participate in the study. Some of senior lawyers gave the suggestions regarding forming LAWYER
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMES at the courts ; which seems to be a very good suggestion.
References
[1]. T.D.Peterson,E.W.Peterson: Stemming the tide of the law student depression, what law school need to learn from the positive
psychology; http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty publication/ 871-2008.
[2]. William w. Eaton et all: Occupations and prevalence of major depressive disorders, J.Occupational med.'1079-1083,1990.
[3]. Martin E.P. Seligman,PaulR,Verkuil Terry H Many: Why lawyers are unhappy; Deakin law rev. 49, 66, 2005.
[4]. AkiomeKnows,Orito Kawakami, Takashi Haratani: Job stressors and long term sick leave due to depressive disorders among
Japanese male employee,; J. Of epidemiology and community health , 64,229-235,2010.
[5]. Anita Sharma, ShewtaVerma, DalipMalhotra: Stress and burnout as predictors of job satisfaction amongst lawyers; European
journal of social sciences, 3(14),348-359,2010.
[6]. RajiaKalimo, MostafaBotawi, Carey Cooper: Psychosocial factors at work and their relation to health; WHO, Geneva, 1-
15,1987.
[7]. H.K.Jenson, J.Wieclaw, T. Munch Hansen: Does dissatisfaction with psychosocial work climate predict depressive, anxiety and
substance abuse disorders; A prospective study of Danish public service employees; Journal of Epidemiology and community
health,64, 796-801,2010.
[8]. Julie D. Henry , John R. Crawford. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct
validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample; British Journal of Clinical Psychology (2005), 44, 227239 .
[9]. Lovibond LH, Lovibond PF: Manual for the depression,anxiety,stress scales,2nded, Sydney. Psychology foundation of
Australia,1995
[10]. Clark LA,Watson D: Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications, ;
J.Abnorm.Psychol; 100,316-336,1991
[11]. Psychology foundation of Australia: Depression, anxiety, stress scales at http://www.psy.unsw.edu.au/group/dass// accessed
April 15,2011.
[12]. Weir; The beginning of mental illness : American Psycho Assn. 43(2), 36,2012.
[13]. Wehrenberg: The suicide of a lawyer with depression: Ken‟s story, lawyers with depression
Legally Unhappy: Psychological Distress In Legal Practitioners
DOI: 10.9790/0853-150507129132 www.iosrjournals.org 132 | Page
[14]. http://www.lawyerswithdepression.com/articles/the-suicide-of-a-lawyers-with-depression-
[15]. ken-story/2011.
[16]. Curtis: Looking for a happier legal carrier or something different, CA Bar Journal
[17]. http://www.calbarjournal.com/January 2010/Topheadlines/TH1.aspx/2010
[18]. Carlton: Getting help when you need it California Bar Journal ;
[19]. http://www.calbarlap.com/CBJ /2006 -MCLE-article-doc.pdf/2006
[20]. Griffith: Job satisfaction in the legal industry law crossing
[21]. http://www.lawcrossing.com/article/112/job-satisfaction-in-the-legal-industry/2014.
[22]. Chiu L.Do professional women have job satisfaction than professional men lawyers as a case study? Journal sex roles; 3,7-
8,1998.
[23]. Hagan J. Kay F: Even lawyers get the blues; Gender, depression and job satisfaction in legal practice. Law Soc.Rev,41,51-
78,1999.
[24]. Diacoff S. Lawyers know thyself: A review of empirical research on Attorney attributes bearing an professionalism: Am.
Univ.Law Rev;46,3-14,1997.
[25]. Kirti A. Patel, Shekhar R. Rajderkar, JayshreeD. Naik, Vivek S. Behere: A study of certain correlates of job satisfaction among
judicial personnel in a district of Western Maharashtra;
[26]. Indian J. Occup. Environ.Med,18(2); 68-74;2014.
[27]. Grant K. Marsh P. Syniar G: Gender differences in rates of depression among undergraduates ;measurement matters; J.
Adolesc;25,613-617,2002.
Table 2: Overall DASS score in legal practitioners
N O R M A L
M I L D
S E V E R E
E X T R E M E
SEVERE
M E A N ± S . D .
D e p r e s s i o n
3 1
7
3
2
8 . 9 6 ± 8 . 1 6
A n x i e t y
2 2
5
8
5
8 . 1 2 ± 6 . 0 3
S t r e s s
2 8
6
4
2
1 7 . 6 2 ± 7 . 1 8
Table 3: Gender difference in DASS score
D e p r e s s i o n
mean±s.d.
A n x i e t y
mean±s.d.
S t r e s s
mean±s.d.
M a l e s n = 3 6
9 . 7 1 ± 8 . 3 5
1 0 . 0 8 ± 7 . 2 8
1 0 . 4 7 ± 6 . 6 0
F e m a l e s n = 1 4
7 . 6 4 ± 6 . 5 4
8 . 7 8 ± 6 . 4 9
1 3 . 7 9 ± 8 . 7 6
N S
N S
S
NS= non significant. S= significant
Graph 1: Overall DASS score in legal practitioners
Graph 2: Gender difference in DASS score
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In present scenario, the legal profession has gained utmost importance, which makes the job of a lawyer the most challenging, with lots of mental and physical strain. The rewards can be great, but so are the pressures. High job demands lead to imbalance between what is expected and what is received (job dissatisfaction) which, in turn, leads to job strains. So, the present study focused on the impact of certain variables on job satisfaction of the judiciaries. To study the level of job satisfaction among judicial personnel; to identify the impact of job level (hierarchy) in the experience of job satisfaction; to find the gender difference (if any) for the level of job satisfaction; and to examine the pattern of relationship of certain variables with job satisfaction. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 1 year duration, in total 965 judicial personnel of different courts in the district of Sangli, which involved data collection using predesigned proforma. A scale, having 15 different independent predictors was used as a validated screening tool, to calculate their job satisfaction score. The most contributing variable and its correlation with job satisfaction was found by stepwise multiple regression and correlation analysis using SPSS Version-16. Out of the total, Class I judiciaries were 692 (71.7%). A majority (71.4%) of the study subjects were male. Overall mean job satisfaction score was 5.38 ± 2.7. Twenty-three percent females, compared with only 9% males, had low job satisfaction (P < 0.5). The best predictor of job satisfaction in males and females was emotional exhaustion (β = 0.191) and conflicts between values and practice (β = 0.252), respectively. Higher is the job satisfaction score, lesser the level of job satisfaction. The findings of the study revealed that job satisfaction was found to be significantly (P < 0.0005) and positively correlated with all the variables in the study.
Article
Full-text available
We review psychometric and other evidence relevant to mixed anxiety-depression. Properties of anxiety and depression measures, including the convergent and discriminant validity of self- and clinical ratings, and interrater reliability, are examined in patient and normal samples. Results suggest that anxiety and depression can be reliably and validly assessed; moreover, although these disorders share a substantial component of general affective distress, they can be differentiated on the basis of factors specific to each syndrome. We also review evidence for these specific factors, examining the influence of context and scale content on ratings, factor analytic studies, and the role of low positive affect in depression. With these data, we argue for a tripartite structure consisting of general distress, physiological hyperarousal (specific anxiety), and anhedonia (specific depression), and we propose a diagnosis of mixed anxiety-depression.
Article
Objectives: To determine the impact of burnout and psychosocial stressors on the jobsatisfaction among male and female lawyers from different courts of Himachal Pradesh (India). Methodology: Three subscales of burnout and psychosocial stressors were used as predictors (independent variables) of job-satisfaction (dependent variables) among 150 equal numbers of male and female lawyers. The statistical treatments included Pearson's product moment co-efficient of correlation along with descriptive data (means, standard deviation and t-test (for gender difference). Regression analysis was also computed to find out the best set of predictors of job satisfaction. Results: The factors causing job dissatisfaction were (1) emotional exhaustion (2) depersonalization (3) reduced personal accomplishment (4) stress (5) strained interpersonal relationship (6) over-expectation (7) poor economic position (8) jealousy (9) poor social position (10) competition and (11) conflict between values and practice for male and female lawyers. Conclusion: The stepwise regression analysis indicated that emotional exhaustion, stress due to clients, work underload and economic position have turned out to be the significant predictors of job-satisfaction showing 45% variance for males and 55% variance for females. The t-test analysis revealed higher job-satisfaction for male lawyers as compared to their female counterparts. Whereas female lawyers experienced significantly greater psychosocial stressors and burnout as compared to males.
Article
A central paradox in studies of gender and jobsatisfaction is why women's job satisfaction is notlower than men's, given that women's jobs are ofteninferior. The explanation most commonly used is that women have lower expectations than men becausethey compare themselves to women while men comparethemselves to men. However, general studies maybemasking a gender difference in higher occupationallevels. The current study explores this possibility byanalyzing the 326 lawyers in the 1990 National Survey ofLawyers' Career Satisfaction. Of the women, 9% wereminorities, and of the men, 3%. It is found that women have significantly lower jobsatisfaction. Women's lower job satisfaction is dueprimarily to their lack of influence and promotionalopportunity. The results support the assertion thatprofessional women have the same expectations asprofessional men, not lower, but because of inequalityin opportunity, the women have lower jobsatisfaction.
Article
It is an intriguing puzzle that women lawyers, despite less desirable working conditions and blocked career advancement, report similar satisfaction as men lawyers with their legal careers. The paradoxical work satisfaction reported by women and men lawyers obscures a more notable difference in their depressed or despondent feelings. Using a panel study of women and men lawyers practicing in Toronto since the mid-1980s, we find at least three causal pathways through which gender indirectly is connected to job dissatisfaction and feelings of despondency. The first path is through gender differences in occupational power, which lead to differential despondency. The second path is through differences in perceived powerlessness, which directly influence job dissatisfaction. The third path is through feelings of despondency that result from concerns about the career consequences of having children. The combined picture that results illustrates the necessity to include measures of depressed affect in studies of dissatisfaction with legal practice. Explicit measurement and modeling of concerns about the consequences of having children and depressed feelings reveal a highly gendered response of women to legal practice that is otherwise much less apparent. Women are more likely to respond to their professional grievances with internalized feelings of despondency than with externalized expressions of job dissatisfaction. That is, they are more likely to privatize than publicize their professional troubles.
Article
The aim of this study was to examine if dissatisfaction with psychosocial work climate predicts psychiatrically diagnosed depressive, anxiety and substance abuse disorders. In Aarhus County, Denmark, 13 423 public service employees at 683 workplace units answered a questionnaire survey assessing psychosocial work environment. An average workplace unit score of overall satisfaction with psychosocial working conditions, rated on a scale from 0-10 with 10 being most satisfied, was computed and assigned to the individual employees at each work unit. Aggregated satisfaction scores were divided into three levels, according to the 25-75 percentiles. Data on hospitalisations and outpatient treatments for depressive, anxiety and substance abuse disorders was obtained from the Danish Central Psychiatric Research Register. HRs and 95% CIs were computed for first onset of studied disorders, starting from the baseline survey at 1 January 2002 through to 30 April 2008. Risk estimates were adjusted for sociodemographic variables. A low satisfaction with psychosocial working conditions was associated with an increased risk of any mental health disorder, HR(adj) 1.71, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.82. The lower the satisfaction level, the higher was the risk of mental health disorders. Moreover, substance abuse disorders were more frequent among men dissatisfied with work climate, HR(adj) 3.53, 95% CI 1.55 to 8.03. Working in a dissatisfying psychosocial environment increases the risk of subsequent mental health disorders. Randomised, controlled intervention trials may help in resolving whether this association is causal.
Article
A growing body of literature shows that law students exhibit unique signs of psychological distress, including elevated levels of depression, stress, and anxiety. Law students also report significantly higher incidences of alcohol and drug abuse than their peers at other graduate schools. The article assesses the programs that 75 top law schools currently use to combat these alarming trends and finds that they are primarily reactive and that they do not sufficiently address the source or the scope of the problem. This article explores some of the ways in which positive psychology may be uniquely suited to address this student distress. The scientific literature offers a number of methodologies that law schools could utilize to help insulate students from stress and depression. The article then presents the results of an empirical study in which one of these methods was tested in the law school context. The study showed high rates of depression and stress, similar to the results of earlier studies, and shows a very high correlation between stress and depression. The results also confirm that students who find ways to use their top strengths are less likely to suffer from depression and stress and more likely to report satisfaction with life. Encouraging students to utilize their personal strengths may therefore act as a buffer against psychological distress in law school. The article concludes with suggestions for law schools to incorporate these findings and other well established positive psychology principles into a proactive program to benefit their students.
Article
Two studies tested for gender differences in rates of depression among undergraduates using three conceptualizations of depression (mood, syndrome, disorder). The first sample consisted of 325 non-referred undergraduate students, who completed pencil-and-paper measures of depressed mood, depressive syndrome and a depressive disorder analogue. The second sample consisted of 894 undergraduate students seeking counselling services, who participated in clinical intake interviews assessing depressed mood and depressive disorder. Results of analyses provide no evidence of gender differences in rates of depressed mood in either samples or of depressive syndrome in the non-referred sample. However, in both samples, gender differences in rates of depressive disorder were found, with male students more likely than female students to be depressed.
Article
To test the construct validity of the short-form version of the Depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21), and in particular, to assess whether stress as indexed by this measure is synonymous with negative affectivity (NA) or whether it represents a related, but distinct, construct. To provide normative data for the general adult population. Cross-sectional, correlational and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The DASS-21 was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N = 1,794). Competing models of the latent structure of the DASS-21 were evaluated using CFA. The model with optimal fit (RCFI = 0.94) had a quadripartite structure, and consisted of a general factor of psychological distress plus orthogonal specific factors of depression, anxiety, and stress. This model was a significantly better fit than a competing model that tested the possibility that the Stress scale simply measures NA. The DASS-21 subscales can validly be used to measure the dimensions of depression, anxiety, and stress. However, each of these subscales also taps a more general dimension of psychological distress or NA. The utility of the measure is enhanced by the provision of normative data based on a large sample.
Manual for the depression,anxiety,stress scales,2 nd ed, Sydney. Psychology foundation of Australia
  • L H Lovibond
  • P F Lovibond
Lovibond LH, Lovibond PF: Manual for the depression,anxiety,stress scales,2 nd ed, Sydney. Psychology foundation of Australia,1995