Normative Appeals to the Natural

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.


Surprisingly, many ethical realists and anti-realists, naturalists and not, all accept some version of the following normative appeal to the natural (NAN): evaluative and normative facts hold solely in virtue of natural facts, where their naturalness is part of what fits them for the job. This paper argues not that NAN is false but that NAN has no adequate non-parochial justification (a justification that relies only on premises which can be accepted by more or less everyone who accepts NAN) to back up this consensus. I show that we cannot establish versions of NAN which are interesting in their own right (and not merely as instances of a general naturalistic ontology) by appealing to the nature of natural properties or the kind of in-virtue-of relation to which NAN refers, plus other plausible nonparochial assumptions. On the way, I distinguish different types of 'in virtue of claims. I conclude by arguing that the way in which assessment of meta-ethical hypotheses is theory-dependent predicts the failure of non-parochial justifications of NAN.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
This article examines issues surrounding the importance or unimportance of personal identity. It distinguishes numerical identity from qualitative identity. It argues in defence of constitutional reductionism which holds that a person is reducible to but not identical to bodily and psychological events. It describes the results of some thought experiments (science fiction cases) to show that in many instances we are unable to decide about the identity of the person.
This book presents an ethical theory that uniquely integrates naturalistic and rationalistic elements. Robert Audi develops his theory in four areas: moral epistemology, the metaphysics of ethics, moral psychology, and the foundations of ethics. Comprising both new and published work, the book sets forth a moderate intuitionism, clarifies the relation between reason and motivation, constructs a theory of intrinsic value and its place in moral obligation, and presents a sophisticated account of moral justification. The concluding chapter articulates a new normative framework built from both Kantian and intuitionist elements. Connecting ethics in novel ways to both the theory of value and the philosophy of action, the essays explore topics such as ethical intuition, reason and judgement, and virtue. Audi also considers major views in the history of ethics, including those of Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Mill, Moore, and W. D. Ross, and engages contemporary work on autonomy, responsibility, objectivity, reasons, and other issues. Clear and conceptually rich, this book makes vital reading for students and scholars of ethics.
This is a book in metaethics that defends a brand of moral realism known as non-naturalism. The book has five Parts. Part I outlines the sort of moral realism that the author wishes to defend, and then offers critiques of expressivism and constructivism. Part II is devoted to issues in metaphysics. It argues that moral realists have adequate replies to worries based on supervenience and the alleged causal inefficacy of moral facts. Part III is devoted to issues of moral motivation. It argues that motivational internalism is false, and that a Humean theory of action is also mistaken. Part IV is devoted to an extended discussion of moral reasons. It argues that externalism about reasons is true, that moral rationalism is true, and that moral realism has an adequate account of moral disagreement. Part V is devoted to moral epistemology. It argues for the self-evidence of pro tanto moral principles, and for a version of reliabilism about ethical knowledge.
This book presents an extended argument for a robust realism about value. The robust realist affirms the following distinctive theses. There are genuine claims about value which are true or false - there are facts about value. These value-facts are mind-independent - they are not reducible to desires or other mental states, or indeed to any non-mental facts of a non-evaluative kind. And these genuine, mind-independent, irreducible value-facts are causally efficacious. Values, quite literally, affect us. These are not particularly fashionable theses, and taken as a whole they go somewhat against the grain of quite a lot of recent work in the metaphysics of value. Further, against the received view, this book argues that we can have knowledge of values by experiential acquaintance, that there are experiences of value which can be both veridical and appropriately responsive to the values themselves. Finally, these value-experiences are not the products of some exotic and implausible faculty of 'intuition'. Rather, they are perfectly mundane and familiar mental states - namely, desires. This view explains how values can be 'intrinsically motivating', without falling foul of the widely accepted 'queerness' objection. There are, of course, other objections to each of the realist's claims. In showing how and why these objections fail, the book introduces a wealth of interesting and original insights about issues of wider interest - including the nature of properties, reduction, supervenience, and causation.
Some proponents of the truthmaker principle claim that it has an explanatory power, such as that of explaining why idealism is false, or explaining the mind-independence of truth. Other proponents of the truthmaker principle claim that describing things as truthmakers has explanatory power, such as that of formulating and solving the problem of universals. This chapter makes a case for scepticism about claims of both kinds. First, it is argued that the truthmaker principle fails to have the alleged explanatory power, and its supposed benefits can be had without it. Second, it is argued that talk of 'truthmakers' and of 'the ontological ground of truth' are empty metaphors without explanatory content.
Rae Langton and David Lewis have proposed an account of “intrinsic property”that makes use of two notions: being independent of accompaniment and being natural. We find the appeal to the first of these promising; the second notion, however, we find mystifying. In this paper we argue that the appeal to naturalness is not acceptable and offer an alternative definition of intrinsicality. The alternative definition makes crucial use of a notion commonly used by philosophers, namely, the notion of one property being had in virtue of another property. We defend our account against three arguments for thinking that this “in virtue of”notion is unacceptable in this context. We also take a look at a variety of cases in which the definition might be applied and defend it against potential counterexamples. The upshot, we think, is a modest but adequate account of what we understand by “intrinsic property.”
Philosophers have long suspected that thought and discourse about what we ought to do differ in some fundamental way from statements about what is. But the difference has proved elusive, in part because the two kinds of statement look alike. Focusing on judgments that express decisions--judgments about what is to be done, all things considered--Allan Gibbard offers a compelling argument for reconsidering, and reconfiguring, the distinctions between normative and descriptive discourse--between questions of "ought" and "is." Gibbard considers how our actions, and our realities, emerge from the thousands of questions and decisions we form for ourselves. The result is a book that investigates the very nature of the questions we ask ourselves when we ask how we should live, and that clarifies the concept of "ought" by understanding the patterns of normative concepts involved in beliefs and decisions. An original and elegant work of metaethics, this book brings a new clarity and rigor to the discussion of these tangled issues, and will significantly alter the long-standing debate over "objectivity" and "factuality" in ethics. Table of Contents: I. Preliminaries 1. Introduction: A Possibility Proof 2. Intuitionism as Template: Emending Moore II. The Thing to Do 3. Planning and Ruling Out: The "Frege-Geach" Problem 4. Judgment, Disagreement, Negation 5. Supervenience and Constitution 6. Character and Import III. Normative Concepts 7. Ordinary Oughts: Meaning and Motivation 8. Normative Kinds: Patterns of Engagement 9. What to Say about the Thing to Do: The Expressivistic Turn and What it Gains Us IV. Knowing What to Do 10. Explaining with Plans 11. Knowing What to Do 12. Ideal Response Concepts 13. Deep Vindication and Practical Confidence 14. Impasse and Dissent References Index This is a remarkable book. It takes up a central and much-discussed problem - the difference between normative thought (and discourse) and "descriptive" thought (and discourse). It develops a compelling response to that problem with ramifications for much else in philosophy. But perhaps most importantly, it brings new clarity and rigor to the discussion of these tangled issues. It will take some time to come to terms with the details of Gibbard's discussion. It is absolutely clear, however, that the book will reconfigure the debate over objectivity and "factuality" in ethics. --Gideon Rosen, Professor of Philosophy, Princeton University Gibbard,/author> writes elegantly, and the theory he develops is innovative, philosophically sophisticated, and challenging. Gibbard defends his theory vigorously and with admirable intellectual honesty. --David Copp, Professor of Philosophy, Bowling Green State University
Peer Reviewed
Truth and Truthmakers
  • D M Armstrong
Armstrong, D. M. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supervenience Revisited Reprinted in his Essays in Quasi-Realism, 130-48
  • Simon Blackburn
Blackburn, Simon 1985. ''Supervenience Revisited.'' Reprinted in his Essays in Quasi-Realism, 130-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
The Question of Realism
—— 2001. ''The Question of Realism.'' Philosophers' Imprint 1: No. 1: 1–30.
  • John F Fox
Fox, John F. 1987. ''Truthmaker.'' Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 188–207.
  • Paul Horwich
Horwich, Paul 1998. Truth, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Human Concerns without Superlative Selves
  • Mark Johnston
Johnston, Mark 1997. ''Human Concerns without Superlative Selves.'' In Reading Parfit, ed. J. Dancy, 149–79. Oxford: Blackwell.
Supervenience and Mind
  • Jaegwon Kim
Kim, Jaegwon 1993. Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Explanatory Knowledge and Metaphysical Dependence
—— 1994. ''Explanatory Knowledge and Metaphysical Dependence.'' In Truth and Rationality, Philosophical Issues 5: 51–69.
Moral Generalities Revisited
  • Margaret O Little
Little, Margaret O. 2000. ''Moral Generalities Revisited.'' In Moral Particularism, ed. B. Hooker and M. Little, 276–304. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Truth, Correspondence, Explanation and Knowledge.'' Reprinted in his Logical Necessity and Other Essays
  • I G Mcfetridge
McFetridge, I. G. 1977. ''Truth, Correspondence, Explanation and Knowledge.'' Reprinted in his Logical Necessity and Other Essays. London: Aristotelian Society, 1990.
Varieties of Supervenience
  • Brian Mclaughlin
McLaughlin, Brian 1995. ''Varieties of Supervenience.'' In Supervenience: New Essays, ed. E. E. Savellos and U ¨. D. Yalc¸inYalc¸in, 16–59.
Descriptivism, Normativity and the Metaphysics of Reasons
  • David Mcnaughton
  • Piers Rawling
McNaughton, David and Rawling, Piers 2003. ''Descriptivism, Normativity and the Metaphysics of Reasons.'' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 77: 23–45.
Principia Ethica. Revised edition with ''Preface to the Second Edition'' and other papers
  • G E Moore
Moore, G. E. 1903 ⁄ 1993. Principia Ethica. Revised edition with ''Preface to the Second Edition'' and other papers, ed. T. Baldwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press. —— 1939. The Foundations of Ethics
  • W D Ross
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press. —— 1939. The Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Explaining Explanation. London: Routledge. Salmon, Wesley C. 1971. ''Statistical Explanation
  • David Ruben
Ruben, David-Hillel 1990. Explaining Explanation. London: Routledge. Salmon, Wesley C. 1971. ''Statistical Explanation.'' In Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, ed. W. Salmon, 29–87. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Reasons, Responsibility, and Reliance: Replies to Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh
—— 2002. ''Reasons, Responsibility, and Reliance: Replies to Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh.'' Ethics 112: 507–28.
Scanlon's Contractualism
  • R Wallace
  • Jay
Wallace, R. Jay 2002. ''Scanlon's Contractualism.'' Ethics 112: 429–70.
Making Things Happen
  • James Woodward
Woodward, James 2003. Making Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.