ArticlePublisher preview available

Corporate Social Responsibility in Agribusiness: Literature Review and Future Research Directions

DOI:10.1007/s10806-016-9620-0
Authors:
Henrike Luhmann at Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Henrike Luhmann
Ludwig Theuvsen at Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Ludwig Theuvsen
Read publisher preview
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Changes in social framework conditions, accelerated by globalization or political inventions, have created new societal demands and requirements on companies. The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often considered a potential tool for meeting societal demands and criticism as a company voluntarily takes responsibility for society. The spotlight of public attention has only recently come to focus on agribusiness-related aspects of CSR. It is therefore the objective of this paper to provide an overview and a critical examination of the current state of research into CSR in agribusiness from different perspectives. Upon that this paper goals to define CSR special cases in agribusiness and derive implications for further research. CSR in agribusiness is a multi-dimensional and complex concept, which is sensitive to ongoing exchange processes between companies and stakeholders. We conclude with the special position of CSR in agribusiness and that future research should focus on adding value to industry-specific CSR aspects in the general CSR framework borrowed from management literature. Explorative fieldwork such as expert interviews with different stakeholders might be suitable for gaining insights into agribusiness-specific aspects of CSR in firms.
  • A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
  • Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
REVIEW PAPER
Corporate Social Responsibility in Agribusiness:
Literature Review and Future Research Directions
Henrike Luhmann
1
•Ludwig Theuvsen
1
Accepted: 2 May 2016 / Published online: 25 May 2016
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016
Abstract Changes in social framework conditions, accelerated by globalization or
political inventions, have created new societal demands and requirements on companies.
The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often considered a potential tool
for meeting societal demands and criticism as a company voluntarily takes responsibility
for society. The spotlight of public attention has only recently come to focus on
agribusiness-related aspects of CSR. It is therefore the objective of this paper to provide
an overview and a critical examination of the current state of research into CSR in
agribusiness from different perspectives. Upon that this paper goals to define CSR special
cases in agribusiness and derive implications for further research. CSR in agribusiness is a
multi-dimensional and complex concept, which is sensitive to ongoing exchange pro-
cesses between companies and stakeholders. We conclude with the special position of
CSR in agribusiness and that future research should focus on adding value to industry-
specific CSR aspects in the general CSR framework borrowed from management liter-
ature. Explorative fieldwork such as expert interviews with different stakeholders might
be suitable for gaining insights into agribusiness-specific aspects of CSR in firms.
Keywords Corporate social responsibility Agribusiness Literature review
Introduction
Changes in social framework conditions, accelerated by globalization or political
inventions, have created new societal demands and requirements on companies.
Consumers, especially in developed societies, are increasingly concerned about the
&Henrike Luhmann
henrike.luhmann@agr.uni-goettingen.de
1
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Go
¨ttingen, Platz
der Go
¨ttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Go
¨ttingen, Germany
123
J Agric Environ Ethics (2016) 29:673–696
DOI 10.1007/s10806-016-9620-0
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... New Zealand's agricultural sector faces significant environmental challenges, including declining biodiversity (Department of Conservation, 2020), high greenhouse gas emissions (IPCC, 2014;Le Quéré et al., 2016), and deteriorating water quality . These challenges influence society's views of the agricultural sector, and failure to address such social pressures may lead farmers to poor outcomes, including loss of legitimacy (the informal consent that the general public, governments, scientists, policy-makers, and local communities grant to individual businesses or the wider sector per Boutilier and Thomson, 2011); poor records of corporate social responsibility (the informal endorsement from stakeholders after a business has addressed given challenges per Luhmann and Theuvsen, 2016); loss of identity as 'good farmers' (peers' acknowledgement and status within the community per Burton et al., 2020); and lower social licence to operate (the acceptance of an industry's activities by the community, which strongly links to public trust and confidence per Parsons et al., 2014). Hence, societal views can strongly influence farmer behaviour. ...
... Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to the voluntary responsibility a business takes for society (Luhmann and Theuvsen, 2016), often in a 'top down' approach (Edwards and Trafford, 2016). Originating in the 1950s, the initial focus of CRS was food security and safety. ...
... Originating in the 1950s, the initial focus of CRS was food security and safety. However, following an increase in public scrutiny of animal welfare, CSR now largely focuses on the ethics of food production (Luhmann and Theuvsen, 2016). One strategy by which farms have demonstrated CSR is via transparency in processes, for example by enabling consumers to look onto the farm via webcams and open days Vanhonacker and Verbeke, 2014). ...
View
... In turn, public institutions, echoing these demands, pass them on through new regulations or recommendations (Heyder & Theuvsen, 2009). These pressures affect all stakeholders in the fruit and vegetable production-commercialization chain, and failure to heed them can threaten the reputation and legitimacy of companies and the sector itself (Heyder & Theuvsen, 2009;Luhmann & Theuvsen, 2016). The capacity of companies to integrate these social demands into their strategies can become an intangible asset that will ensure their long-term survival and that of the sector itself (Palazzo &Scherer, 2006). ...
... The capacity of companies to integrate these social demands into their strategies can become an intangible asset that will ensure their long-term survival and that of the sector itself (Palazzo &Scherer, 2006). Subsequently, these companies are increasingly concerned about identifying and responding to the socio-environmental demands that affect their business (Luhmann & Theuvsen, 2016). ...
Are there any differences in the corporate social responsibility strategy of fruit and vegetable production-commercialization cooperatives and other companies operating in southeastern Spain?
Article
  • Apr 2023
Customers, civil organizations, the media, and society demand that companies behave in ways beyond regulatory requirements concerning social and environmental issues. Therefore, companies are striving to adapt to these new requirements and to express their commitment to stakeholders through their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategy. The values and principles of cooperatives make them ideal for responsible business management within the framework of CSR. Almeria is a province in southeastern Spain and it is one of the areas with the highest concentration of agribusi-ness in Europe. This paper aims to empirically verify whether the CSR orientation of agricultural cooperatives in this province are greater than that of other companies because of the application of these principles. Or, if globalization and competition is pushing these organizations to abandon their principles and This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
View
... Consumer knowledge regarding animal welfare practices holds the potential to significantly influence their purchasing decisions, leading them to value, prefer, and engage with brands that adopt ethical practices concerning animals (Kitano et al., 2022). Such consumer choices reinforce the alignment between their ethical stances and committed brands, thereby impacting brand reputation (Luhmann & Theuvsen, 2016). To ensure the efficacy of this effect, it is crucial for companies to adopt transparent communication, providing clear information regarding their animal welfare practices (Rim et al., 2019). ...
View
... The consensus view has emerged that the GRI Standards tend towards being more rigorous, whilst those from SASB have been regarded as more comprehensive, especially given their industry-specific focus (Tóth et al., 2021). The issue of sustainability in the agriculture and food sector has been a global concern for decades (Aigner et al., 2003), later work focusing on CSR initiatives by agribusiness (Luhmann & Theuvsen, 2016) and the ways in which agribusinesses might best report their sustainability profiles (Sachs et al., 2021;Klychova et al., 2019). Studies directed at agribusiness sustainability reporting according to existing standards are however still rare, either detecting undue concentration on environmental reporting in developed countries (Topp-Becker & Ellis, 2017), identifying room for improvement in sustainability awareness elsewhere (Milić, 2021), or warning that voluntary actions and disclosures by companies might not be sufficient to correct the wide range of negative externalities and social costs produced by the agri-food sector (Sodano & Gorgitano, 2017), a conclusion only partially refuted by one more positive recent evaluation of reporting by the agribusiness giant Cargill (Jindřichovská et al., 2021). ...
Seeds of change: how will the creation of the International Sustainability Standards Board affect sustainability reporting by agribusiness?
Preprint
Full-text available
  • Apr 2023
The introduction of new ESG reporting Standards in the form of the International Sustainability Standards Board is a potential route to ending the problem of multiple Standards that has bedevilled ESG reporting since its inception. The ISSB has already issued two draft Standards, one for general reporting and one on climate change. There are however multiple potential issues of conformity with these Standards by agribusinesses, including problems of definition, difficulties of intepretation, and the creation of new Standards specifically focused on the agricultural supply chain. Whilst problems of this kind are not unique to agribusiness, their resolution will require dialogue between agribusinesses themselves and the ISSB.
View
... Organizational perspectives to food system sustainability have mainly been provided by the field of supply chain and strategic management research, in which corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been linked to the food industry as an empirical context (e.g., Maloni & Brown 2006;Hartmann 2011;Gold & Heikkurinen 2013). While these studies are useful for understanding sustainability in corporate organizations, they are limited to management activities, strategic decision-making, and business outcomes in general (Luhmann & Theuvsen 2016). Sustainability is context dependent (e.g., Geels & Schot 2007;Dedeurwaerdere 2014), and the transformation of foodways requires a deeper understanding of contextual, socio-cultural aspects underlying daily food activities, including those of organizations. ...
Transforming Foodways: Sustainability Sensemaking Processes among Finnish Food Companies
Article
Full-text available
  • Mar 2023
Food companies are central actors in driving sustainability transformations at the interface of production and consumption. Still, only limited attention has been directed to how sustainability-related meanings are being created within various food industry organizations. In this article, we explore the characteristics of the sustainability sensemaking and -giving processes among food companies and analyze how these processes influence sustainability-related transformations of current foodways. Our analysis is based on qualitative data (transcripts and notes) from interviews with managers from 15 Finnish food companies. By using organizational sensemaking literature, we shed light on the companies’ cultural talk and social meaning creations of sustainability. Our findings indicate that food companies’ sustainability sensemaking is an intra- and inter-organizational, social process occurring between the individual and organizational spheres of the organizations. Food companies act as sensegivers, as they actively communicate with stakeholders to achieve the position of a knowledgeable sustainability forerunner. Sustainability has been normalized in the talk and action of food companies, but the discursive space offered by them is limited to weak sustainability perspectives. While socio-material transgressions of current foodways may emerge, we argue that a shift from communicating and commercializing sustainability to a focus on ecological material aspects and ecological sensemaking is essential for transforming foodways towards strong sustainability.
View
... Academic discourse addressing CSR in agribusiness illustrated the modalities through which sustainability is implemented through CSR in the operational management activities carried out by businesses 75 . CSR has become an instrument for agribusiness actors to stay competitive and improve their ability to cope with unpredictable market conditions 76 . It permits to reinforce company's advantage and success Soft normativity for food sustainability by contributing to product differentiation and the efficient use of resources 77 . ...
Soft Normativity for Food Sustainability: An EU Code of Conduct for businesses between collective responsibility and greenwashing
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2022
In the last two decades, a plethora of instruments conveying informal normativity strongly entered the EU legislative process to define public values softly enforced for food policy purposes. The Code of Con-duct for food business adopted in 2021 as an integral part of the ‘Farm to Fork’ strategy has been the last piece of this normative trend. It relies on some general principles to provide a basis for ethical-and evi-dence-based commitments aimed at achieving a sustainable food system, while guiding market actors in the pursuit of enhanced private-sector accountability. The convergence of ethical and legal principles raises, however, quarrels of legitimacy and responsibility in its mediating between non-negotiable values and marketing strategies. This contribution highlights the merits and pitfalls of the EU Code’s structure and discusses the normative role assigned to it within the EU approach to sustainability dynamics. The analysis posits that a risk remains for the EU Code to being rhetorically legitimized in the name of its purported democratic nature, while primarily pointing to support and strengthen EU food marketplace.
View
View
Mit Corporate Social Responsibility die Transformation der Landwirtschaft vorantreiben?
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2023
Der Agrarsektor steht unter enormem Veränderungsdruck: Negative Umwelt- und Klimaauswirkungen etablierter Produktionssysteme müssen verringert und gleichzeitig möglichst viele Menschen ernährt werden. Entsprechend intensiv wird nach geeigneten Konzepten und politischen Steuerungsmöglichkeiten gesucht. Viele Landwirt(inn)e(n) engagieren sich bereits freiwillig und übernehmen Verantwortung, doch reicht dies nicht aus. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ist ein in anderen Wirtschaftsbereichen etablierter Ansatz, freiwillige gesellschaftliche Verantwortungsübernahme zum integralen Bestandteil von Unternehmenskultur zu machen. Wir diskutieren, wie weit sich CSR auf landwirtschaftliche Betriebe übertragen lässt.
View
View
View
Wodurch wird die Arbeitszufriedenheit landwirtschaftlicher Arbeitnehmer beeinflusst?
Article
Full-text available
  • Aug 2015
In response to changes in agricultural policy and structural changes in agriculture, family-run farms are developing into extended family-run farms with non-family employees. As a consequence, farm managers frequently find themselves having to deal with issues of personnel management. Due to the increasing shortage of skilled labour, farm workers’ job satisfaction has taken on growing importance in acquiring and retaining workers. This study investigates the influence of various farm-related factors, as well as lifestyle and health satisfaction, on the job satisfaction of agricultural employees. The results of a multivariate regression analysis show that two factors – health satisfaction and the work itself – play a particularly large role in farm workers’ job satisfaction. These results suggest options for farm managers looking to increase job satisfaction among their non-family employees.
View
View
View
View
The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses
Article
Although brand theorists suggest that what a person knows about a company (i.e., corporate associations) can influence perceptions of the company's products, little systematic research on these effects exists. The authors examine the effects of two general types of corporate associations on product responses: One focuses on the company's capabilities for producing products, that is, corporate ability (CA) associations, and the other focuses on the company's perceived social responsibility, that is, corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations. The results of three studies, including one that measures respondents’ CA and CSR associations for well-known companies and one that uses consumers recruited in a shopping mall, demonstrate that (1) what consumers know about a company can influence their beliefs about and attitudes toward new products manufactured by that company, (2) CA and CSR associations may have different effects on consumer responses to products, and (3) products of companies with negative associations are not always destined to receive negative responses. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for marketing managers and further research.
View
A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management
Chapter
  • Feb 2008
The purpose of this chapter is to outline the development of the idea of "stakeholder management" as it has come to be applied in strategic management. We begin by developing a brief history of the concept. We then suggest that traditionally the stakeholder approach to strategic management has several related characteristics that serve as distinguishing features. We review recent work on stakeholder theory and suggest how stakeholder management has affected the practice of management. We end by suggesting further research questions.
View
View
Exploratory analysis of corporate social responsibility practices in mexican agricultural companies
Article
  • Jan 2012
The agricultural sector is one of the most important sectors in Mexico, due to its contribution to the GDP and the number of employees that it creates. Nevertheless, the social and environmental challenges are issues that the agricultural sector has to resolve in order to maintain its own sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a business strategy can contribute to the solutions of these problems. The number of Mexican enterprises implementing CSR has been increased during the last 10 years, specifically ESR distinctive. But why do companies want to obtain this distinctive? And which are the benefits to get it? The purpose of this paper is to explore CSR practices in Mexican agricultural companies, identifying the reasons and effects of the CSR distinctive acquirement, awarded by the Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía, A.C. In order to get the information, 12 Mexican agriculture companies (holders of the CSR distinctive) were surveyed from December 2010 to January 2011. Reasons for the CSR distinction acquirement of these companies are basically strategic, while the effects are all positives mainly in corporate image.
View
View
Ernährung und Wissen: Theoretische Annäherungen an eine Ethik des Essens und Trinkens
Chapter
  • Dec 2015
Hinsichtlich des Essens und Trinkens verfügt der Mensch über eine hohe alltagskulturelle Kompetenz, die seinem Ess- und Trinkverhalten trotz genereller Heterogenität und Reflexivität eine situative Plausibilität verleiht. Den Ausgangspunkt der Überlegungen des Beitrags bildet die Ernährung selbst. Diese gilt der kulturwissenschaftlichen Nahrungsforschung ganz grundsätzlich als „soziales Totalphänomen“, insofern sie weit über den rein physiologischen Prozess der Nahrungsaufnahme und -verwertung hinaus wesentliche Aspekte gesellschaftlichen Zusammenlebens spiegelt. Sie ist also Teil dessen, was Clifford Geertz als kulturelles Bedeutungsgewebe verbildlicht hat: eines Gewebes, das der Mensch zwar selbst erschafft, in welches er sich aber stets auch verstrickt. Es präsentiert sich als „Menschenwerk“ und ist doch nur bedingt individuell beherrschbar. Es bietet Handlungsspielräume, verdichtet sich aber auch zu einem Gewirr von Fäden, welches unser Denken und Handeln begrenzt, unwahrscheinlich oder gar unmöglich machen kann. Was also tatsächlich gegessen wird, was hingegen konsumiert werden sollte und wie resultierend aus diesem Spannungsfeld Positionen einer sinnvollen Ernährungsethik zu etablieren sowie darauf ausgerichtete Handlungsempfehlungen an unterschiedlichste Akteure zu formulieren sind, dies alles ist abhängig von der Art und Weise individuellen wie kollektiven Navigierens durch das selbstgesponnene Bedeutungsgewebe der Kultur. Ganz offensichtlich nimmt unser „Wissen“ in diesem Zusammenhang eine Schlüsselrolle ein – und steht somit auch im Fokus dieses primär wissensanthropologisch orientierten Beitrags.
View