ArticlePDF Available

We live in a VUCA World: the importance of responsible leadership

Authors:

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to describe the role of responsible leadership in a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous) world. Design/methodology/approach This paper explains how responsible leadership is aligned with the critical success factors necessary to thrive in a VUCA world. Findings Critical success factors in the VUCA world are: sound business principles, a firm’s agility to respond speedily, strong collaborative networks, innovation and ethical practices. These are aligned with a responsible leadership style, which is a combination of transformational, servant and authentic leadership. Socialimplications This paper argues that responsible leadership embraces the broader societal issues and concerns based on ethical judgment. Originality/value This paper provides insights on how responsible leaders can meet the requirements of VUCA world.
Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal
We live in a VUCA World: the importance of responsible leadership
Anita Sarkar
Article information:
To cite this document:
Anita Sarkar , (2016),"We live in a VUCA World: the importance of responsible leadership", Development and Learning in
Organizations: An International Journal, Vol. 30 Iss 3 pp. 9 - 12
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/DLO-07-2015-0062
Downloaded on: 22 May 2016, At: 11:01 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 6 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3 times since 2016*
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:267154 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
Downloaded by XLRI Jamshedpur School of Business & Human Resources At 11:01 22 May 2016 (PT)
Conceptual papers
We live in a VUCA World: the importance
of responsible leadership
Anita Sarkar
Anita Sarkar is based at
Faculty of Human
Resources Management,
XLRI Jamshedpur,
Jamshedpur, India.
The ways in which we conduct or think about our businesses have substantially
changed within a decade. The term VUCA – which stands for volatility,
uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity – is a common phrase these days in the
corporate world and was coined from the US Army. Rapid changes taking place in
political, economic, social and technological fronts are making the organizational world
increasingly VUCA.
Critical factors for success in this world depend on practicing:
sound business fundamentals;
innovation;
fast-paced response;
flexibility;
change management;
managing diversity – at both local and global level;
market intelligence; and
strong collaboration with all relevant stakeholders – employees, customers, suppliers,
shareholders and the broader society.
Leaders, from CEOs to any other internal manager, therefore have a major role to play in
ensuring their organizations are responding to the requirements of the VUCA business
environment.
What kind of leader is needed to succeed in a VUCA world?
Normative leadership theories have focused on transactional leadership, transformational
leadership, servant leadership and authentic leadership (Johnson, 2012). Recent literature
on leadership, however, has started a discussion on what is termed responsible leadership.
First, a brief overview of each form of leadership:
Transactional leadership
The focus of transactional leadership is on how leaders can align subordinates to
organizational goal attainment, by using either punishment or rewards (Yukl, 2006). This
approach is similar to the “carrot and stick policy”. The assumption underlying this style is
that leaders can control and shape subordinate behavior.
DOI 10.1108/DLO-07-2015-0062 VOL. 30 NO. 3 2016, pp. 9-12, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1477-7282 DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING IN ORGANIZATIONS PAGE 9
Downloaded by XLRI Jamshedpur School of Business & Human Resources At 11:01 22 May 2016 (PT)
Transformational leadership
Success in transformational leadership depends on both leaders and followers elevating
each other to a higher level of understanding. For followers, a transformational leader
remains an inspiration (Bass, 1985). In this way, transformational leadership is primarily
leader centric; leaders bring forth change in the corporation with a level of charismatic aura
surrounding them.
Servant leadership
The centre of interest in servant leadership is the follower. The leader shares information
and resources to support the followers. If the followers are empowered, leadership will be
regarded as successful.
Authentic leadership
Authentic leadership is based on value driven, ethical fundamentals. Four key
characteristics of authentic leaders (Avolio and Gardner, 2005) with their key
interpretations are shown in Table I.
Responsible leadership
Responsible leadership contains the essential qualities of the three latter leadership styles
above – transformational, servant and authentic. The main focus of responsible leadership
is a leader’s exchange with followers, team, organization and society at large (Doh and
Quigley, 2014). Thus, responsible leadership goes beyond the traditional forms of
superior–subordinate exchanges. Leadership in this case gets deeply connected to the
corporate social responsibility of an organization.
With the transformational aspect, responsible leaders encourage teamwork, set high
performance targets and encourage out-of-the-box thinking in their followers.
Responsible leaders with their servant leadership approach put the interests of
subordinates first, over and above their own self interests. This creates an empowering
experience for the followers. Research shows that empowerment leads to creativity at work,
which is one of the important criteria for success and sustainability in today’s VUCA world.
The authenticity of responsible leaders not only helps to prevent fraud in an organization
but also ensures learning agility, flexibility and the participation of others, as the leader
listens and integrates diverse perspectives when making decisions. From the large
numbers of frauds and scandals that dragged names like Jeff Skilling of global power
company Enron in 2001, Ramalinga Raju of Satyam Computer in 2009 and so on, one of the
important lessons learnt was that leaders’ ethical integrity is of paramount importance in
maintaining their corporation’s long-term success.
Table I Authentic leadership dimensions and interpretations
Dimensions Interpretations
Self-awareness Leaders are well aware about their strengths and
weaknesses
Balanced processing Before taking a decision can objectively process
others’ perspective even if it challenges the leader’s
own convictions
Internalized moral perspective Takes decision based on high internal moral and
ethical standards
Genuineness while dealing with others Cultivates a culture of openness by sincerely sharing
opinions, information and feelings while dealing with
others
PAGE 10 DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING IN ORGANIZATIONS VOL. 30 NO. 3 2016
Downloaded by XLRI Jamshedpur School of Business & Human Resources At 11:01 22 May 2016 (PT)
Employees, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders now find it easy to share their
views, which in turn can help leaders locate new market opportunities and possibilities of
mutually beneficial collaboration.
The all-inclusive leadership approach of responsible leadership is bound to make change
management seamless (Coldwell et al., 2012) – which is a hallmark of success for any
effective leadership.
In India, the Swiss Ambassador Award for Responsible Leadership was given to Yash
Chopra from the entertainment industry, Ratan Tata of Tata Sons, Glenn Saldanha of
Glenmark Generics Ltd., RV Kanoria of Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd. and Azim
Premji of Wipro Ltd. All these leaders share the following common characteristics:
sound business knowledge;
humility;
ethical practices;
strong networking ability; and
belief in the power of giving.
Each of these qualities is aligned to the critical success factors of surviving in a VUCA world.
Are responsible leaders born or made?
Responsible leadership is a combination of both innate and acquired traits of an individual.
For instance, the ethical or moral standards of an individual get shaped, to a large extent,
at an early age through parents, teachers and significant others.
It has also been observed that personal crises, such as a major life changing event, a
disability, have a significant impact on a leader: from the ashes of such an experience, a
changed leader emerges like a phoenix and is reborn. In Indian history, Emperor Ashoka,
a great leader of the time, came to a deeper sense of self-realization in the aftermath of his
victory in the battle of Kalinga. As a result, he created a culture based on the Buddhist
principle of respect for all.
An individual’s own self-reflection combined with an organization’s vision, mission and
practices also plays a major role in shaping the responsible leader who is self-aware, can
subdue his/her self-interest for a greater cause and is committed to serving the broader
interests of relevant stakeholders.
Responsible leadership embraces societal issues and concerns based on sound ethical
judgment, which ensures the long-term sustainability of any organization in the VUCA world.
Conclusion
Research on responsible leadership is still at a nascent stage. However, given its
all-compassing approach toward ethicality, valuing others and inclusivity, it is certain that
this type of leadership is the “need of the hour” for effectively addressing the requirements
of a VUCA world. The foundation of responsible leadership is based on the following
treatise: “Give to the world the best you have and the best will come back to you”.
The main focus of responsible leadership is a leader’s
exchange with followers, team, organization and society at
large.
Keywords:
Leadership development,
Management development,
Engagement and learning,
VUCA world
VOL. 30 NO. 3 2016 DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING IN ORGANIZATIONS PAGE 11
Downloaded by XLRI Jamshedpur School of Business & Human Resources At 11:01 22 May 2016 (PT)
References
Avolio, B.J. and Gardner, W.L. (2005), “Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of
positive forms of leadership”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 315-338.
Bass, B.M. (1985), Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, Free Press, New York, NY.
Coldwell, D.A.L., Joosub, T. and Papageorgiou, E. (2012), “Responsible leadership in organizational
crises: an analysis of the effects of public perceptions of selected SA business organizations’
reputations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 109 No. 2, pp. 133-144.
Doh, J.P. and Quigley, N.R. (2014), “Responsible leadership and stakeholder management: influence
pathways and organizational outcomes”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 28 No. 3,
pp. 255-274.
Johnson, C.E. (2012), Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership: Casting Light or Shadow, Sage
Publications, London.
Yukl, G. (2006), Leadership in Organizations, 6th ed., Prentice Hall, NJ.
Corresponding author
Anita Sarkar can be contacted at: anitasarkar@xlri.ac.in
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
PAGE 12 DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING IN ORGANIZATIONS VOL. 30 NO. 3 2016
Downloaded by XLRI Jamshedpur School of Business & Human Resources At 11:01 22 May 2016 (PT)
... Oynaklık, çevredeki değişim hızını ve büyüklüğünü ifade ederek ani ve dramatik değişimlerle karşılaşılan durumları tanımlar (Kristensen ve ark., 2021; Raja, 2021). Belirsizlik, gelecekteki olayları öngörmenin zorluğunu vurgularken, liderlerin bilinçli kararlar almasını güçleştirir (Sarkar, 2016;Rimita ve ark., 2020). Karmaşıklık, kuruluşların karşılaştığı karmaşık bağımlılıkları ve çok yönlü zorlukları içerir ve çoğunlukla sofistike yanıtlar gerektirir (Roziq ve ark., 2021;Turi ve Sorooshian, 2022). ...
... Bu yaklaşım, örgütün VUCA ortamında daha çevik olmasını sağlar (Lechler ve ark., 2019; Ninassi, 2023). VUCA dünyasında belirsizlik yönetimi; çevik liderlik, etkili risk yönetimi, çalışan gelişimi ve veri odaklı karar vermeyi içeren bütünsel bir strateji gerektirir (Sarkar, 2016;Schoemaker vd., 2018;Wilson, 2023). ...
... Değişime karşı proaktif bir duruşu teşvik eder ve liderlerin öğrenme ve uyum yeteneğinin ön planda olduğu bir ortam yaratmalarını önerir (Pangaribuan vd., 2020;Raja, 2021). Kuruluşlar bu karmaşık ortamda ilerlerken, sorumlu liderlik ve etik uygulamaların önemi artar, bu sayede yalnızca hayatta kalmakla kalmaz, aynı zamanda zorluklar karşısında gelişirler (Sarkar, 2016). ...
... Konsep ini telah meluas ke berbagai bidang termasuk bisnis, teknologi, dll. Berikut merupakan komponen VUCA yang terdiri dari [6] [7] : 1. Volatility: mengacu pada perubahan yang cepat, tidak terduga, dan sering terjadi baik dalam skala kecil maupun besar. ...
Article
Full-text available
Era VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity) menghadirkan tantangan besar dalam dunia pendidikan. Mahasiswa dituntut untuk menguasai pengetahuan teoritis dan praktis dalam menghadapi dinamika tersebut. Program kontekstualisasi pembelajaran yang melibatkan mahasiswa, penggerak ekonomi, dan pengelola pendidikan melalui forum Larasdikdudi, diharapkan mampu menjawab tantangan ini. Metode yang diterapkan meliputi focus group discussion, penyusunan materi pelatihan, pelaksanaan pelatihan, generating business idea, mentoring peserta, pitching ide bisnis dan evaluasi kegiatan. Hasil pengabdian masyarakat ini menunjukkan bahwa Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kontekstualisasi pembelajaran dapat meningkatkan keterampilan praktis, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan problem-solving di kalangan mahasiswa dan siswa. Selain itu, program ini juga berhasil menciptakan trainer yang memiliki kapabilitas untuk menyebarkan ilmu pengetahuan dan pemahaman teori ke masyarakat luas. Dengan demikian, program pengabdian masyarakat ini diharapkan mampu membantu mahasiswa dan siswa beradaptasi dengan tantangan VUCA dan memberikan kontribusi nyata bagi masyarakat. Program pengabdian masyarakat ini juga dapat menciptakan Kontekstualisasi pembelajaran untuk mendorong penggerak ekonomi di era VUCA.
... The definition of employee engagement is the degree of dedication to the company, the readiness to put in more effort than is necessary, and the desire to go above and beyond (Royal & Agnew, 2011).According to Moccia et al. (2019), there is a positive correlation between higher employee engagement and the development of core competencies like sensemaking, diversity of perspective, flexibility in decision-making, humility, and openness to feedback in order to thrive in a volatile and uncertain environment. Sarkar (2016) and Hepner (2019) asserted that, cultivating a "Thinking outside the box" mindset is crucial to the company's viability in volatile and uncertain times. Furthermore, firms need innovation to thrive in an unpredictable and confusing marketplace; for this reason, managers should prioritize creating an organizational culture that welcomes change, experimentation, creativity, and an innovative mentality (Gandhi, 2017). ...
Article
Today’s business environment is more volatile than before. Organizations must create and implement plans to deal with this disruptive environment globally. This paper investigates possible strategic solutions businesses could employ to survive in a volatile, uncertain, and complex world. Thus, literature review is carried out to present unbiased conclusions about what is currently known in the field of study. The literature review makes clear that in order for an organization to survive and prosper in a volatile and uncertain business environment, it must first prepare its people. Organizational culture and structure are the two primary themes at the organization level. The organizational structure has decentralized management, resilience, responsiveness, and entrepreneurial mindsets. While the emphasis is on management and leadership at the individual level, covering the competencies that managers should possess, how to find managers who possess these competencies, and how managers should apply their skills, learning organizations, high levels of engagement, promoting innovation, teamwork, and non-linear thinking are characteristics of the organizational culture. In addition, the primary theme is how to get the staff ready for a VUCA environment. There are also distinct interactions noted between leaders, managers, and employees. This study offers insightful information about VUCA-related strategies. This research seeks to improve understanding of organizational development and human resources management as a strategic method that corporate managers and executives may use to navigate a highly volatile and complicated environment. It does this by conducting a thorough review of multiple scholarly articles.
... (Strategic) innovation remains central to addressing interconnected challenges and driving organizational success (Bindra et al., 2019;Mamo et al., 2024;Sarkar, 2016;Spallini et al., 2022). Forward-thinking strategies enable businesses to adapt their business models, particularly digital ones, to align internal (dynamic) capabilities with shifting customer and market demands, ensuring long-term competitiveness (Gronum et al., 2016;Remane et al., 2017). ...
Article
The rapidly shifting global environment continues to challenge traditional approaches to corporate strategy and governance (Situm, 2021). As organizations navigate increasing complexity in a world characterized by VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) and the more recent BANI (brittle, anxious, nonlinear, and incomprehensible) framework, themes such as sustainability, resilience, crisis management, strategy and business model, and competitiveness have gained prominence as foundational pillars for success in the modern business landscape.
... This upheaval has placed organizations in a very difficult decision-making environment, where they must navigate the ethical implications of AI deployment while balancing opportunities for progress and risks of dehumanization (Fritts and Cabrera 2021;Kim et al. 2021;Haenlein et al. 2022). The acceleration of technological disruption has amplified all four pillars of the VUCA world (Sarkar 2016;Millar et al. 2018): volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. The rapid pace of technological advancement often outstrips policymakers' ability to effectively address its consequences, presenting volatility and uncertainty as systematic challenges for organizational skills development; furthermore, complexity and ambiguity are intrinsic in the difficult achieving of the goal to harness technological potential while preserving human control (McAfee and Brynjolfsson 2017;Blackman and Niño 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has the potential to automate, integrate or augment human creativity. Current literature reveals that organizations adopting such disruptive technology can both boost or hinder human creativity. Such ambiguity poses an ethical dilemma for decision-makers: while managers are pressured to adopt GAI quickly for optimization, holding on to their economic responsibilities, they must also ensure that its deployment is ethically enrooted and yields people-centered outcomes. This work seeks to discuss and inform managerial decision-making upon GAI deployment, by elucidating how ethically-salient dimensions of human creativity can be safeguarded and supported through GAI adoption. To do so, we draw on Personalism and its account of human creativity, as tied to inner morality and intrinsic dignity of the person. By this way, we present a model that highlights how three core dimensions—uniqueness, relationality, and unpredictability—are essential to preserve the human element in creative tasks in GAI adoption. Overall, this normative work contributes to enhance our knowledge on personalism within organizational studies, to shed new light on how organizations can safeguard the ethical nexus between human creativity and human intrinsic dignity, and to highlight how humanism in business can support people-centered AI deployment.
Chapter
Abstract The “VUCA world” is an environment characterized by unprecedented levels of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA). In such a turbulent environment, corporate entrepreneurship is key for all businesses, especially family firms. Corporate entrepreneurship is a concept that enables innovation, growth, and competitive advantage over competitors. It is a driving force for organizations to make changes in their structures and operations to respond to changes by using the limited resources they have in the environments in which they operate and to reduce the negative effects of shortening product life cycles. Family firms, which have an important place in the economies of countries, are indispensable players in economic activities, they need to think more strategically, and innovative and have an entrepreneurial perspective in ensuring their adaptation for competitive and growth purposes. In this study, the relationship between the place of family firms in the VUCA world and corporate entrepreneurship was tried to be established, and the corporate entrepreneurship of family firms was examined in line with their corporate logic. For this purpose, the news on the corporate websites of seven family companies operating in Türkiye and included in the 2023 Family Business Index was analyzed by content analysis method. Data were coded with thematic coding and findings were revealed. Common types of logic in family firms are market logic and efficiency and savings logic, with a hybrid characteristic consisting of a combination of market logic and efficiency and savings logic. Keywords: Family Firm, VUCA, Entrepreneurship, Corporate Entrepreneuship, Türkiye
Chapter
The idea of generation sheds light on the attributes of people who lived during a particular era by explaining how societies that experienced similar experiences, eras, and systems throughout human history share common behaviors, values, and personality traits (Arslan & Staub, 2015; Bellou et al., 2018). According to Mackay (1997), generational differences arise from how people perceive and respond to recurring events and shifting environmental situations. These differences are also seen in how people conduct themselves in the workplace.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose-Responding to the call for more research on the consequences of grit, this study aims to examine the relationship between grit and employees' perceived employability. Drawing on the self-determination theory, the authors hypothesize that job involvement and team member proactivity sequentially mediate the relationship between grit and employability. Design/methodology/approach-A time-lagged research design with a one-month interval was conducted to collect data from three public sector organizations in China (N = 484). The model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and the PROCESS bootstrapping program in SPSS25.0 and AMOS21.0 software. Findings-The findings reveal that the positive effect of grit on employability is mediated by job involvement and team member proactivity sequentially. Originality/value-The authors contribute to the literature on the employability outcomes of grit. It is also one of a few studies that use a job perspective on the grit−employability relationship.
Article
Full-text available
Objective The present research was conducted with the aim of identifying the competencies (knowledge, skills, abilities, attitudes, and characteristics) required of leaders in a turbulent environment. Methods This study employed a qualitative approach and a meta-synthesis method. The method provided by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) was utilized for this purpose. The research community consisted of 483 scientific documents published between 2016 and 2023, which were sourced from 8 international and 4 domestic databases. The databases searched included ProQuest, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Sage, Emerald, ResearchGate, Springer, SID, IranDoc, Normex, and MagIran. After analyzing the titles and content, 27 scientific documents were selected and thoroughly analyzed. The findings were then analyzed using the thematic analysis method. Results A review of the existing literature on the competencies of leaders in turbulent environments reveals that, despite the substantial research conducted in this field, only certain aspects of these competencies have been addressed. The dimensions and categories of leadership in turbulent conditions have not been comprehensively examined together, nor has a comprehensive model been developed. Moreover, the obstacles to developing these competencies have not been adequately presented. Based on the findings of the present study, the competencies of leaders in a turbulent environment were organized into five dimensions: abilities, individual ethics, organizational and psychological ethics, attitudes, knowledge, and skills. The knowledge dimension includes 13 concepts under two components: organizational knowledge and peripheral knowledge. The abilities dimension
Article
Full-text available
The construct of responsible leadership has gained considerable traction in contemporary management scholarship. Yet defining and operationalizing how responsible leadership manifests in organizational outcomes has posed challenges. In this paper, we draw from stakeholder theory to offer a more fully formed view of how responsible leadership influences organizational processes and outcomes. We provide descriptions of two distinct pathways through which leaders and their organizations exhibit and project their responsible leadership behaviors and actions: psychological and knowledge- based. We suggest that these two pathways constitute process mechanisms that advance and disseminate specific signals and messages and, ultimately, actions and outcomes. We provide brief illustrations of three companies and their leaders to underscore the potential of our framework. We conclude with implications for research and practice.
Article
‘The loss of a stable state’ (Schon 1973) in organizational transformation can both be regarded as lamentable and inevitable. Transformation causes disruption and invasions of comfort zones to those affected by it, but it is nevertheless inevitable. The article maintains that while the loss of a stable state is inevitable in the stream of change confronting organizations today, points of stability and methods of dealing with instability are attainable through responsible management. The article postulates that steps taken by responsible leadership in response to specific business crises will reduce the effects of instabilities brought about by such transformational situations and reassert a stable state more rapidly. Utilizing Weber’s ‘ideal type’ model format (Morrison 2006) with a specific example of international best practice of remedial steps taken by management in reaction to a specific crisis experienced by an organization, the article uses a qualitative historical case study analysis and quantitative time series research design to investigate South African firms which had recently faced crises impinging on their current corporate reputations. Findings suggest that both the number of remedial steps taken by companies and the speed in which they are implemented in conformance with the model are negatively associated with the size of the share price falls immediately post crises. The findings also suggest that larger share price appreciations over 6-month post-crises are associated with greater perceived corporate reputations and brand strengths. Tentative conclusions and possibilities for further research are briefly discussed.
Article
This Special Issue is the result of the inaugural summit hosted by the Gallup Leadership Institute at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 2004 on Authentic Leadership Development (ALD). We describe in this introduction to the special issue current thinking in this emerging field of research as well as questions and concerns. We begin by considering some of the environmental and organizational forces that may have triggered interest in describing and studying authentic leadership and its development. We then provide an overview of its contents, including the diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives presented, followed by a discussion of alternative conceptual foundations and definitions for the constructs of authenticity, authentic leaders, authentic leadership, and authentic leadership development. A detailed description of the components of authentic leadership theory is provided next. The similarities and defining features of authentic leadership theory in comparison to transformational, charismatic, servant and spiritual leadership perspectives are subsequently examined. We conclude by discussing the status of authentic leadership theory with respect to its purpose, construct definitions, historical foundations, consideration of context, relational/processual focus, attention to levels of analysis and temporality, along with a discussion of promising directions for future research.