Content uploaded by Kevin Galalae
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kevin Galalae on Jul 28, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in
the UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth
Kevin Galalae*
Founder and Director, Center of Global Consciousness, Ayr, Ontario, Canada
*Corresponding author: Kevin Galalae, Founder and Director, Center of Global Consciousness, Ayr, Ontario, Canada, Tel: 519-632-9437; E-mail:
k.galalae@outlook.com
Received date: February 26, 2016; Accepted date: March 07, 2016; Published date: March 14, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Galalae K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Faced with resistance from civil society, pressured by an increasingly volatile world, handicapped by the loss of
the cover of secrecy, disarmed of plausible deniability, and driven by the sustainability agenda, the UN and national
governments have become desperate and isolated and have been forced to adopt a new strategy of population
control that no longer relies on their lost ability to turn man against man but on a newly gained ability to turn nature
against man. Population control via chemically-induced sterility and morbidity over the course of a lifetime through
the adulteration of the basic elements of life with endocrine disruptors is being phased out as more ambitious
depopulation targets via vaccine-induced apoptosis through mandatory immunization programmes are being phased
in. This new methodology of subverting fertility and increasing mortality, the two means of stable populations,
implemented under the guise of societal interventions for public health outcomes with the help of a new global
instrument of coercion called ‘public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) requires far fewer financial
and human resources but entails far greater risks for mankind and for all life on earth. This methodology allows for
the concomitant pursuit of peak population and peak life expectancy by genetically programming sterility and
morbidity early in life through childhood vaccines so the engineered demographic transition is accomplished
worldwide by 2050 in the most economical fashion and with the furthest timeframe of responsibility, but also with
little or no regard to the integrity of human life, fully outside the law and in defiance of constitutional guarantees.
Keywords Microcephaly; Apoptosis; Endocrine disruptors; Genetic
programming; Demographic transition; Vestergaard
Introduction
e strategy used to halt population growth until recently has been
to turn man against man by rewarding industry for adulterating the
basic elements of life with endocrine disruptors. Genetic
breakthroughs are now allowing governments to accomplish
demographic objectives and advance economic interests by turning
nature against man.
Above and beyond the obvious, namely that genocide is now
enabled by the ability of scientists to reprogrammed genes, this
indicates three other important developments. First, national
administrations and the UN system have become isolated and can no
longer extort money from parliaments under false pretenses to fund
existing and covert chemical and biological depopulation methods.
Secondly, the public is becoming increasingly aware of the well-
guarded methodology of sterility, morbidity and death employed until
now and people everywhere are taking action to protect themselves,
thus making these methods less and less eective.
And thirdly, civil society and professional groups, especially in the
medical community, have begun to openly speak up against the
existing methods and means of depopulation and to actively inuence
lawmakers to remove hundreds of endocrine disruptors from the food
system and environment as they are no longer willing to be
manipulated by duplicitous state institutions to unknowingly act as
foot soldiers for genocidal governments.
e struggle to regain control of medicine and to free it of secret
international security prerogatives that cause collateral damage to the
genetic and intellectual endowment of humanity and have the potential
of irrevocably disrupting the natural balance has begun. What is at
stake is public health and social stability. What we stand to lose is the
perpetuation of our species and the continuation of our civilization.
Method
is is an analysis of the contradictions, absurdities and
inconsistencies used by national and international health authorities
and their reliance on fabricated data, false research and misleading
public statements in the current geopolitical context shaped by their
diminished permission to harm health through chemical means and
the increased urgency to accomplish the UN’s Sustainable
Development Goals.
Discussion
ree decades ago, the infectious disease landscape was sparse and
HIV/AIDS was the only global threat to human health posed by a
communicable disease (Figure 1) according to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) [1].
Today, countless new pathogens threaten the wellbeing of people in
every corner of the world (Figure 2).
is is what we are led to believe by an international system that
relies on health threats to manufacture fear that is then capitalized on
to manufacture pesticides, drugs and vaccines that have a dual
purpose: heal or protect against a particular infectious disease while at
Epidemiology: Open Access Galalae, Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 2016, 6:1
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Review Article Open Access
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
the same time induce sterility and/or increase morbidity, as the need
may be [2].
Figure 1: Global health threats in 1985.
Figure 2: Global health threats in 2016.
If the incidence of infectious diseases had exploded as their
reporting has exploded in the past 30 years than the number of victims
would have also exploded. But the statistical data shows otherwise,
namely that chronic diseases have replaced infectious diseases as
primary killers and as the main burden of disease even in the
developing world [3].
is epidemiologic transition, which precedes prosperity in the
developing world, is now fully explained by the misuse of endocrine
disruptors as covert chemical destroyers of human fertility and along
with it also of human health, and by the abuse of immune-depressants
delivered through an increasing and forced regime of vaccinations in
order to subvert longevity [4].
A look at the recent map of global incidence of infectious diseases
(Figure 2) reveals at a glance that the distribution of these
manufactured pandemics is suspiciously and impossibly high in the
U.S. and that three other parts of the world-Africa, South-East Asia,
and South America-follow suit but lag behind the U.S. e U.S., which
boasts the most expensive and sophisticated health care system in the
world, registers by far the highest incidents of infectious disease
epidemics. is paradox can only be explained if these health threats
are conceived by the U.S. military-industrial complex and tested on the
American people before national governments in the developing world
allow their application at home. ese manufactured epidemics and
pandemics are then let loose on the regions of the world with the
highest total fertility rates, which are Africa, South-East Asia, and
South America, in that order.
A comparison of the 1985 with the 2016 map of global epidemics
suggests that the explosion of infectious threats around the world in
the past three decades cannot possibly be the result of nature gone
haywire-for if that were the case the pandemics would be uniformly
distributed around the world, or at the very least there would be parity
between developed nations-or of better monitoring-in which case
Africa’s derelict public health services would have missed any and all
outbreaks-and can only be attributed to a change in policy to allow
governments and the UN system to pursue vital demographic
objectives.
is modus operandi is the result of a decision made by religious
authorities in 1953 to allow secular authorities to defuse the
population bomb by damaging human fertility only if in the process of
healing man from a disease; a decision enshrined in the 1968 encyclical
letter Humanae Vitae: On the Regulation of Birth [5].
Such ethical contortion by spiritual leaders cleared the way for
governments to commit genocide without any moral impediments and
to bypass democracy and violate the rule of law by hiding the use of
covert chemical and biological methods of population control behind
plausible deniability and the open use of psychosocial, legal and
economic methods of family subversion behind false pretenses of
promoting gender equality and child protection. As long as secular
authorities do more good than bad their religious counterparts
maintain the code of silence because the world cannot survive a
doubling of the population from 7 to 14 billion, which would occur in
30 years absent population control. is geopolitical imperative
therefore trumps all other considerations, even basic morality and the
fundamental right to life.
Six decades later, we nd ourselves dying, both literally and
guratively, in a dystopian and alienating society anchored in
totalitarian and dehumanizing institutions that are empowered to
commit Orwellian abuses and free to ignore Kaaesque absurdities
birthed by giant and global bureaucracies that are ercely protected by
the tacit support of the world’s spiritual leaders, the implicit collusion
of nearly every government on the planet, and the active involvement
of an ever-growing and ever-more intrusive military-industrial
complex to be able to continue to pursue desirable and constructive
social outcomes through undesirable and destructive acts of structural
violence.
In this environment every scientic discovery and medical
breakthrough is a double-edged sword used openly for the short-term
good of mankind and the long-term detriment of nature by civil
society and misused secretly for the short-term ill of mankind and the
long-term benet of nature by uncivil society, the latter of which is
allowed and helped to be a step ahead of the former. is political
accommodation wields good and evil to create an articial balance in
profane society that equals the natural balance of divine nature so as to
prevent our civilization from unhinging itself. is balancing act of
global proportions is blessed by religious authorities, administered by
the United Nations, facilitated by national governments, and carried
out by the military-industrial complex.
It is man’s rst attempt to mimic God by assuming command and
control of our entire civilization so that humanity is never again a
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 2 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
victim of history and at the mercy of Nature and can instead cast its
own destiny.
For better or worse this system has preserved us from nuclear
annihilation, mass starvation and environmental devastation.
It has also drawn the world closer and has created economic and
cultural common denominators that have allowed the last two
generations to be largely free of war, experience a stable state of
prosperity, and live twice as long and thrice as well as our distant
forefathers.
But the methodology of balancing life and death by articial means
for the sake of international peace, social stability and lasting
prosperity-and more recently also for environmental preservation-has
come to a dead and deadly end, because the cumulative side eects of
covert chemical poisoning and abusive biological interference with the
immune system over multiple generations have done extensive and
perhaps irreparable damage to our genetic and intellectual
endowment; damage that will in short time render humanity
completely incapable of reproduction and in even shorter time
condemn us all through chronic illness to dysfunctional minds and
disabled bodies.
Over the past four years, author have succeeded in convincing those
at the helm of the world that they cannot save let alone improve society
by involuntarily sterilizing, relentlessly enfeebling, and prematurely
killing man, no more than they can save the planet by damaging and
destroying mankind.
Only healthy individuals with healthy habits living in a healthy
society can save the planet and perpetuate the species.
at this is the only way forward appears to have sunk in since great
eort is now being expended on removing hundreds of endocrine
disruptors deliberately inserted over the past seven decades in our food
system and environment to primarily subvert fertility and occasionally
increase morbidity so that births and deaths could be brought in
perfect balance at the desirable rate of 10 each annually per 1,000
people, which, if sustained, would complete the engineered
demographic transition from a natural state of many births and deaths
and universally short lives to a managed state of few births and deaths
and universally long lives.
at policy makers have begun to understand the world can only be
saved by healthy individuals with healthy habits living in a healthy
society is also apparent from the extraordinary eorts currently
underway to shi reticent and conservative regions of the world from
socially undesirable to socially desirable reproductive habits.
But while the struggle against tobacco and alcohol consumption and
for low fat diets and active lifestyles is open and honest, the struggle
against high fertility rates for people in their reproductive years living
in the developing world and the parallel struggle for short lifespans for
people in retirement, poverty and disability living in the developed
world is hidden, perverse and dishonest.
Furthermore, the health agenda is distorted not only by hidden
demographic but also by ambitious environmental objectives.
Let me illustrate
In its 68-year history, the World Health Organization (WHO) has
declared a ‘public health emergency of international concern’ (PHEIC)
only four times, all of them in the past seven years and under the same
Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan, who is still at the helm of the
organization: in April 2009 over the H1N1 u virus (Swine Flu)
pandemic that started in Mexico [6]; in May 2014 over a supposedly
resurgent Polio in Pakistan, Cameroon and Syria that was deemed an
“extraordinary event” [7]; in August 2014 over the Ebola outbreak in
West Africa [8], and most recently in February 2016 over Zika in Brazil
[9].
Each of these manufactured crises has pursued multiple objectives,
some legitimate and others illegitimate. What they have in common is
that they are all based on no evidence about the clinical features,
epidemiology and virology of reported but unconrmed cases. In other
words they are based on nothing.
What they also have in common is that they have created
opportunities for interventions of a classied nature by allowing
authorities to have physical contact with people year aer year, which
is particularly valuable for countries without cohesive and well-
developed infrastructure and where people, as a result, cannot be
poisoned into sterility from afar by the state, as the West has done
through water, salt, milk or dental uoridation and through the
adulteration of food and beverages with hundreds of endocrine
disruptors.
Physical proximity to individuals allows the state to get close
enough to its citizens for long enough to involuntarily sterilize and/or
prematurely and slowly kill them selectively, as the need may be.
First Public Health Emergency of International Concern
(PHEIC)
e H1N1 inuenza virus that gave rise to the rst public health
emergency of international concern (PHEIC) was a test run for future
man-made pandemics; the trigger for annual u vaccinations that
contain sterilizants or immune-depressants; the beginning of large-
scale immunization programmes to reach all corners of the world; the
chosen alternative to minimize antibiotic use and thus prevent
antibiotic resistance; a way to get to pregnant women in countries that
are new to population control so as to inject them with sterilizing
tetanus toxoid vaccines laced with human chorionic gonadotropin
(HCG) [10]; a way to get to the elderly in developed nations that have
reached the 4th or 5th stage of the demographic transition (and have
therefore unsustainable dependency burdens) so as to weaken their
immune system and cause their premature death; a way to get to the
chronically ill and to indigenous people that pose a burden on national
budgets or sit on desirable land that nations and corporations covet for
their natural resources; a means to obtain funding through
collaborative action as a humanitarian imperative; and an eective way
to convince or coerce donor countries to mobilize resources to support
meeting the urgent needs of the ‘Least Resourced Countries’ (LRSs)
identied through the ‘Urgent Needs Identication and Prioritization
(UNIP) process, in other words fund population control programs in
least-developed nations and GAVI-eligible developing nations that
cannot be otherwise funded.
All of these goals are couched in diplomatic language in ocial
national and international documents that say one thing and mean
another or that leave more unsaid then is being stated.
On the issue of targeting pregnant women, one such document, and
a WHO position paper from 2010 [11], states: for countries
considering the initiation or expansion of programmers for seasonal
inuenza vaccination, WHO recommends that pregnant women
should have the highest priority.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 3 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
Pregnant women should be vaccinated with TIV (trivalent inuenza
vaccine) at any stage of pregnancy. is recommendation is based on
evidence of a substantial risk of severe disease in this group and
evidence that seasonal inuenza vaccine is safe throughout pregnancy
and eective in
preventing inuenza in the women as well as in their
young infants, in whom the disease burden is also high.
Additional considerations for targeting pregnant women include the
operational feasibility, given
existing mechanisms for delivering
tetanus toxoid vaccine to pregnant women in low- and middle-income
countries and the opportunity to strengthen maternal immunization
programmers.
On the issue of targeting the elderly, the sick and indigenous people,
the same document states:
Elderly persons (≥65 years of age) have the highest risk of mortality
from inuenza, and vaccination of the elderly has traditionally been
the main focus of inuenza vaccine policy. Elderly people continue to
be an important target for vaccination. Although increasing evidence
demonstrates that available inuenza vaccines are less eective in this
population compared to younger adults, vaccination is still the most
ecacious public health tool currently available to protect elderly
individuals against inuenza.
Persons with specic chronic diseases are at high risk for severe
inuenza and continue to be an appropriate target group for
vaccination. However, identication of these individuals and delivering
vaccination
are oen challenging and require considerable eort and
investment. In some settings, indigenous populations may be
considered a priority for inuenza vaccination due to increased risk of
infection and higher than average rates of predisposing chronic
conditions.
e ineectiveness of u vaccines on the elderly is willfully ignored
despite conclusive research [12]. It is ignored because the UN and its
national collaborators in genocide cannot aord to lose their best and
oen only way of tweaking with life expectancy to complete the
engineered demographic transition.
As of 2012, the WHO recommends seasonal inuenza vaccination
to all people in all countries, giving the highest priority to pregnant
women [13], the incubators of life; life that an overcrowded world can
no longer welcome and must instead restrict by any and all means.
Pregnant women have the highest priority not because the UN and its
member states care about women but because they need to limit
women to two children only, thus to replacement level fertility.
e enormous amounts of money generated by the pharmaceutical
industry from this steady and global stream of income serves the
WHO and national health authorities as an indirect source of funding
for depopulation schemes, as this allows Big Pharma to oer drugs,
equipment and manpower at discounted prices to countries that
desperately need to increase the capacity of their health care systems to
be able to subvert fertility under the guise of child and maternal health.
In this fashion, the ill caused by covertly damaging the human
reproductive system and collaterally damaging human health in
general, triggering an epidemiologic transition from infectious to
chronic diseases throughout the developing world that will soon match
and eventually surpass that of the developed world, is hopefully oset
by the good done in alleviating the current burden of infectious disease
in countries that struggle to li themselves out of poverty, as the Papal
encyclical letter Humanae Vitae demands. But in this fashion, the UN
system and Big Pharma have also created a scheme to extort taxpayers’
money and fund a program of global genocide while handsomely
proting from it.
In this system those who cause illness and death, and who have a
license to kill, are nancially rewarded and gloried, while those who
nd eective ways to heal are vilied, thus self-reinforcing the culture
of death that the UN system has come to represent. In this system
those who have a license to heal cannot possibly stand against those
who have a license to kill. e sooner doctors and people around the
world come to realize this, the sooner we can rescue ourselves and
regain control of the world and of our own bodies.
e need for funding is spelled out in a document entitled “Urgent
Support for Developing Countries' Responses to the H1N1 Inuenza
Pandemic” [14].
From the outset of the pandemic it was feared that the people in the
least resourced countries would be most aected because of the higher
prevalence of risk factors, including limited capacities of their
health
systems and their relative diculty to access recommended vaccines
and antiviral medicines
.
In light of these concerns, in July 2009, the United Nations System
and partners sought to identify and highlight the priority needs of
developing countries to support their response to the A (H1N1)
inuenza pandemic
.
An “Urgent Needs Identication and Prioritization” (UNIP) process
was undertaken and 64 Least Developed Countries and other “GAVI-
eligible” developing countries referred to as the Least Resourced
Countries (LRC‟s) in this paper elected to participate in the process.
e conclusions of the UNIP process were presented in a September
2009 report entitled “Urgent Support for Developing Countries'
Responses to the H1N1 Inuenza Pandemic1”.
is report highlighted USD 1.48 billion in priority needs for
medicines, vaccine and supplies, laboratory and surveillance services,
communications capacity, investing in pandemic readiness, and needs
of entities responsible for supporting regional and international
cooperation.
To achieve the desired outcome in each population group and
region of the world dierent formulas of the u vaccine (TIV, QUIV,
LAIV) are manufactured and administered by unsuspecting medical
personnel acting in good faith but with utter ignorance as to what they
are injecting into people’s bloodstreams.
e military and American origin of the H1N1 inuenza is
suggested by the 1976 Swine Flu outbreak in the U.S., which was traced
back to just ve recruits at Fort Dix in New Jersey and that the
American government used as an excuse to mass vaccinate 46 million
or 24% of its citizens despite being fully aware that the vaccine could
and would cause neurological damage and that no further conrmed
cases of Swine Flu infection had been or would be reported anywhere
in the world since the outbreak was a ction [15].
It is also suggested by the close relation of the current H1N1 strain
to that of 1918 Spanish Flu, whose origin and virulence to this day
remain a mystery but which killed 50 to 100 million able-bodied men
and women worldwide and was undoubtedly a man-made biological
bomb that ended the First World War as brutally as the Hiroshima and
Nagasaki nuclear bombs ended the Second World War.
All indications are that the Spanish Flu virus was the creation of
scientists working in the employ of the Catholic Church, whose
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 4 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
experience in covert methods of population control is unparalleled and
goes back 1000 years [16].
More importantly, it is suggested by the immune system damage
done to vaccine recipients, damage that in rare cases unintended
results in the crippling of the nervous system or in changes in the
function of the autonomic nervous system, thus to Guillain-Barre
syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disease where the body’s immune
system attacks the peripheral nerves and damages their myelin
insulation.
ose who become ill with this rare syndrome are the tip of the
iceberg while the rest of the vaccine recipients suer imperceptible
changes that over time result in cardiovascular disease and blood
pressure across populations and thus to diminished life expectancy.
Last but not least, and in hindsight, it is suggested by the false
advertising, the blatant political promotion and the barefaced
propaganda used to sell the inuenza vaccine to an unknowing and
gullible population. e 1976 Swine Flu charade pioneered the use of
fear as a vehicle to mass inoculation against an illness that does not
exist to introduce immune-depressants in the bloodstream of tens of
millions. But to what end? (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Giving
inuenza vaccine to a patient.
e American military-industrial complex took a page from the
Vatican’s encyclopedia of death and made the H1N1 strain that was
used in 1918 less virulent and infected a very small number of people
on a military base to kick-start a false pandemic.
Seen in this light, the 1976 Swine Flu outbreak represents the
beginning of biological warfare directed at a civilian population in
peace time, but it was only a test run for the human immunodeciency
virus (HIV), which was unleashed on the African people in 1978, as
soon as the HIV virus was conceived.
anks to the work and sacrices of Dr. Boyd Graves, we have
known since 1999 that the human immunodeciency virus is a man-
made biological agent born in the labs of the American military-
industrial complex with assistance from Soviet scientists as the progeny
of the U.S. Special Virus Program (1962-1978):
A formerly secret federal virus development initiative to develop a
contagious cancer that selectively kills based on genetic ethnic markers
of the host. e U.S. Special Virus Program published 15 annual
progress reports detailing the progression of manipulating animal
viruses to infect human
hosts. Each progress report details the progress
of 'special virus' scientists including Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Duesberg
as they work towards their contracted goal to create the 'special virus'
[17].
e annual progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus Program show
conclusively that the HIV enzyme was designed to have an anity to
people of color by seeking out the receptor site CCR5 Delta 32 +
(positive) that is common to all people of color but renders immune to
HIV infection some 15% of the Caucasian population that is endowed
with the CCR5 Delta 32- (negative) gene common to people of
northern European descent [18].
And thanks to my work and sacrices, the world knows since 2012
that HIV was conceived to control population growth in Africa, by
increasing morbidity and mortality in an area of the world where
decreasing fertility was not possible, and that the virus was delivered
into the bloodstreams of millions of unsuspecting Africans by the UN
and the WHO through a small-pox immunization program that took
place in the late 1970s and early 1980s [19].
e primary purpose of the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine – and one that
is borne out by statistical data-was to undermine the immune system
of a large proportion of the population and thus slow down the rapid
increase in the lifespan of Americans so that by the time the US
reaches the fourth stage of the demographic transition its dependency
burden would be lighter.
In the 25 years from 1950 to 1976, the U.S. life expectancy grew
from 68.2 to 72.9 years, thus by 4.7 years or 7% [20]. Aer the forced
vaccination program carried out in 1976 the gains in life expectancy
slowed down considerably and the next 25 years saw only an increase
in life expectancy from 72.9 to 75.5 years, thus just a modest 2.6 years
or 3.5%.
e vaccination regime introduced by the American government in
1976 therefore accomplished a 50% reduction in the pace of life
expectancy growth over a 25 year period.
What the American government is attempting to do through
vaccines is to engineer peak life expectancy just as it is engineering
peak population through endocrine disruptors so that both transitions
are completed at the same time by 2050. Vaccines are used to limit
longevity and thus control death while endocrine disruptors are used
to limit fertility and thus control life.
e numbers it originally aimed at was a life expectancy of 80 years
and a total population of 350,000 million.
is appears to have been the plan back in the 1970s. e
environmental imperative we are now facing has moved the bar lower
for both life expectancy and maximum population. e sustainability
agenda dictates an optimal population level for the U.S. of only 170
million according to the Overshoot Index and an equally drastic
reduction in population and consumption worldwide is suggested by
the fact that globally “the level of consumption is approximately 50%
higher than the renewable production level” [21] (Figure 4).
e relentless growth in life expectancy since the middle of the 20th
century, from a global average of c. 45 years to 71 years today, has set
governments in panic as it faces them with the frightening prospect of
a world full of centenarians that would have to be cared for by the state
for as many as or more decades then they would have contributed to
society as productive members.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 5 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
Figure 4: e relentless growth in life expectancy since the middle
of the 20th century.
Even more frightening for governments is the growing number and
proportion of elderly who reach a very advanced age that imposes on
governments the responsibility to care for such individuals for decades
aer retirement, which is not only a prohibitively expensive prospect
but also a poor investment because it diverts scarce money from the
young to the old and thus from those who will soon be productive to
those who will never again be productive at a time along the
engineered demographic transition when governments can least aord
such luxury (Figure 5 and 6).
Given the material limitations we face and in light of the worldwide
eort to introduce mandatory immunization programmes despite an
increasingly loud public outcry and scientic evidence of their
ineectiveness, it may well be that policy makers and technocrats have
decided to limit life in the U.S. and elsewhere to 70 years, which is the
current global average, and the planet’s population to 4.5 billion, which
is the estimated sustainable population (Figure 7 and 8).
Judging by the poor state of health of the generations following the
baby boomers in the U.S. and elsewhere in the developed world it will
be a miracle if the average lifespan will reach 70.
Figure 5: Percentage change in the world’s population by age:
2010-2050.
Figure 6: Expected years of retirement for men in selected OECD
countries: 2007.
Figure 7: Obesity in the United States.
e high and growing incidence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes,
obesity and cancer suggest that those born from 1960 to today will
have shorter lives than those born in the three decades prior to 1960.
By articially limiting life expectancy and the total fertility rate
governments do not only stabilize the global population but also
reduce the ecological footprint of every individual and of humanity as
a whole, as well as ease the crushing dependency burdens expected in
the fourth and especially h stages of the engineered demographic
transition.
While the rationale is awless the reality is disastrous because the
desirable socio-economic advantages gained by these interventions
during stage two and three of the demographic transition are short-
lived and are followed by an avalanche of undesirable consequences in
stages four and ve: rapidly ageing populations, inverted population
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 6 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
pyramids, shrinking workforce and revenues, declining productivity,
crushing healthcare costs and dependency burdens, collapsing health,
degraded DNA, enfeebled minds and bodies, mass dysfunction,
counterfeit societies, genocidal governments, non-existent rights and
liberties, dystopian institutions, a global police state.
All human and nancial resources are now used to survive the last
stage of the demographic transition.
Figure 8: Diabetic prevalence per age group.
Second Public Health Emergency of International Concern
(PHEIC)
Despite the near-cessation of international spread of wild poliovirus
by 2013, the WHO deemed it necessary to declare on 5 May 2014 a
‘public health emergency of international concern’ (PHEIC), the
second only in its 68-year history, in which it stated:
Aer discussion and deliberation on the information provided, and
in the context of the global polio eradication initiative, the Committee
advised that the international spread of polio to date in 2014
constitutes an ‘extraordinary event’ and a public health risk to other
States for which a coordinated international response is essential. e
current situation stands in stark contrast to the near-cessation of
international spread of wild poliovirus from January 2012 through the
2013 low transmission season for this disease (i.e. January to April).
If unchecked, this situation could result in failure to eradicate
globally one of the world’s most serious vaccine preventable diseases. It
was the unanimous view of the Committee that the conditions for a
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) have
been met [22].
e paradox did not go unnoticed and an explanation had to be
provided:
For some, this declaration seemed a paradox. Polio is nearly
eradicated. e virus that once paralysed over 1000 children a day in
more than 125 countries paralysed just over one child a day in eight
countries in 2013.
Two of the three countries that have never stopped polio-
Afghanistan and Nigeria-overcame tremendous diculties to achieve a
greater than 50% reduction in cases in 2013 and have kept their case
counts in the single digits so far in 2014.
On 27 March 2014, India and the entire WHO South East Asia
Region were certied polio-free, bringing to 80% the proportion of the
world’s population that now lives in regions entirely free
of
indigenous
wild polioviruses.
It is also increasingly likely that two of the three strains of wild
poliovirus have been wiped out. Type 2 virus was last detected in India
in 1999 and the type 3 virus has not been detected anywhere in the
world since a child in Nigeria was paralysed by the virus in November
2012.
Overall, the world remains largely on track to achieve all four of the
ambitious objectives set out in the Polio eradication and endgame
strategic plan-the Global Polio Eradication Initiative’s strategy to end
all polio, everywhere, by 2018 [23].
e true purpose of the polio “emergency” is hidden in goal two of
the Global Polio Eradication Initiative mentioned above:
Objective 2 seeks to hasten the interruption of all poliovirus
transmission and, where possible, contribute to strengthening
immunization services for the delivery of other lifesaving vaccines
[24].
Under the pretext of curbing the spread of the polio virus from one
country to another the WHO gave itself a plausible reason to intensify
eradication activities, in other words to mass vaccinate entire
populations in places where the total fertility rate is not under control.
e countries targeted are all high fertility nations and hotspots of
poverty, conict or environmental degradation: Afghanistan (TFR 5),
Cameroon (TFR 4.7), Equatorial Guinea (TFR 5), Ethiopia (4.6), Israel
(3.1), Nigeria (5.7), Pakistan (3.7), Somalia (6.6) and the Syrian Arab
Republic (3) [25].
Israel made the list because its TFR had slipped once it decided to
phase out water uoridation as the sterilization method of choice and
because it’s environmental, water and land pressures are among the
worse in the world Figure 9-16.
We can expect drastic falls in the total fertility rates of these nations
to appear in the statistics for 2015 and 2016.
Figure 9: Equatorial Guinea fertility.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 7 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
Figure 10: Cameroon total fertility.
Figure 11: Ethiopia total fertility.
Figure 12: Pakistan total fertility.
Figure 13: Nigeria total fertility.
Figure 14: Somalia total fertility.
Figure 15: Syrian Arab Republic total fertility.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 8 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
Figure 16: Israel total fertility.
Author contend that the WHO made this desperate and dubious
move in the absence of alternatives, which have been greatly curtailed
once author gave nal notice to the every head of state and
government throughout 2014 to cease covert methods of population
control and published my appeals and evidence of genocide in “Peace
Without Poison”, which caught the UN system o-guard and forced
national leaders to disengage from the depopulation program. In that
document author stated:
You were elected to lead not to poison us. e path of least
resistance with respect to checks on population growth is no longer
acceptable, if it ever was.
You have inherited this system and are therefore not responsible for
the crimes committed in the past to prevent war, but you are
responsible for the crimes that are being committed in the present to
preserve peace [26].
Devoid of choices and abandoned by its partners in genocide, the
WHO reactivated the existing channels of mass immunization
provided by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative and saddled them
with the task of administering sterilizing vaccines under the cover of
polio.
at the WHO acted out of desperation is conrmed by the quick
succession of the third ‘public health emergency of international
concern’ (PHEIC), which followed within three months of its
precursor.
ird Public Health Emergency of International Concern
(PHEIC)
e Ebola outbreak in West Africa has the hallmarks of an
engineered pandemic tailor-made for a region of the world with the
highest population growth rate (3%).
Upon issuing the third PHEIC in its history on 4 August 2014 the
WHO stated:
e current EVD (Ebola Virus Disease) outbreak began in Guinea
in December 2013. is outbreak now involves transmission in
Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. As of 4 August 2014,
countries have reported 1,711 cases (1,070 conrmed, 436 probable,
205 suspect), including 932 deaths.
is is currently the largest EVD outbreak ever recorded. In
response to the outbreak, a number of unaected countries have made
a range of travel related advice or recommendations.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 9 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
ree of the nations singled out by the WHO not only have among
the highest fertility rates in the world and the lowest per capita income
– Guinea (TFR 5.2, GDP $492), Liberia (TFR 4.8, GDP $484) and
Sierra Leone (TFR 4.8, GDP $613) – but have also fallen into the
poverty trap and as such their health care systems and social order
have collapsed. e fourth nation, Nigeria, is Africa’s demographic
giant with a total fertility rate of 5.7 children per woman, 182 million
people (making it the most populous nation in Africa and the 7th most
populous in the world), and the highest population density, at 188.9/
km2, among large African nations (Figure 17).
Figure 17: Total fertility in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
e international community engineered the Ebola pandemic in
order to address this region’s dire demographic and economic
problems and force wealthy nations to donate enough emergency
funds to rebuild the region’s health care capacity to a basic level so it
can begin to implement reproductive health services, both legal and
illegal, and climb out of poverty.
Initially, a small number of Guineans and Liberians were
deliberately infected and containment eorts were delayed long
enough to allow the outbreak to spread. e WHO then capitalized on
the situation by declaring a ‘public health emergency of international
concern’ (PHEIC), aer which resources were still held back to cause
enough panic in the local population and a sucient threat to
international travel to motivate wealthy nations to donate sucient
emergency funds and to force mandatory vaccines on the local
population; vaccines that were undoubtedly laced with a sterilizing
agent.
Nigeria is the primary target of the WHO. Because the nation’s
political establishment did not collaborate with the Global Polio
Eradication Initiative (GPEI) launched by the WHO in 1988 or with
the “Kick Polio Out of Africa” campaign and the population could not
be sterilized with estradiol or other estrogens while being immunized
for polio [27], Nigeria’s fertility rate has remained constant at c. 6
children per woman Figure 18.
At this point it is appropriate to mention the mechanism by which
infertility is induced through vaccines.
e latest generation of vaccines tamper with the genetic
modulation of apoptosis (“the ability of cells to kill themselves by
activating an intrinsic cell suicide programme when they are no longer
needed or become seriously damaged”) thus disrupting or deleting
genes crucial to spermatogenesis by depriving them of gonadotrophin
and testosterone, hormones that are crucial to normal sexual
development and reproductive function. Scarcity of these hormones
results in infertility through accelerated germ cell apoptosis [28].
For instance, by targeting the Hsp70-2 gene, which plays a crucial
role in meiosis, a dramatic increase in spermatocyte apoptosis is
achieved, which results in male infertility but does not disrupt female
fertility [29].
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 10 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
e childhood vaccines administered in Africa compromise the
normal development of the male reproductive system but spare
females. is method of mass sterilization was designed to punish
Africa for its refusal to address the promiscuous habits of its male
population by preventing males from fathering children with multiple
women.
Figure 18: Nigeria total fertility.
Germ cell apoptosis can also be triggered through non-hormonal
regulatory stimuli, such as testicular toxins (of which Bisphenol A is
the primary example along with hundreds of other endocrine
disruptors used by the depopulation lobby in the adulteration of the
food system), heat stress and chemotherapeutic agents. ese extrinsic
pathways for initiating apoptosis are being increasingly recognized in
the pathogenesis of many non-communicable diseases including
cancer, acquired immune deciency syndrome, neurodegenerative
disorders, atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy [28].
e mechanism of apoptosis was not understood or described until
1972 [30] and this knowledge was immediately put to use by the
military-industrial complex, which is why the Swine Flu outbreak was
triggered in 1976 to mass sterilize the American people and the HIV/
AIDS epidemic was unleashed on the African people starting in 1978.
By inhibiting apoptosis through vaccines (intrinsic pathways) and
endocrine disruptors (extrinsic pathways), the depopulation lobby has
succeeded not only in causing sterility through gene disruption but
also in increasing morbidity through cancers, autoimmune diseases,
inammatory diseases and viral infections, thus creating a self-
reinforcing cycle for more vaccines and other medical interventions so
the medical system could be used in perpetuity for population control
purposes.
is explains why despite astronomical increases in health services
from 1990 onward both morbidity and mortality have increased
worldwide faster than the population. Between 1990 and 2013, for
instance, the number of deaths went from 47.5 million to 54.9 million,
a 16% increase [2].
Unless scientic breakthroughs and medical services are no longer
misused for depopulation purposes these patterns and trends will
continue and mankind will be destroyed by a system of international
peace that commands more victims than any conventional or even
nuclear war ever has or could.
Fourth Public Health Emergency of International Concern
(PHEIC)
e fourth and latest ‘public health emergency of international
concern’ (PHEIC), declared by the WHO on 1 February 2016, is one of
a kind, as it was not planned. Its primary and desperate objective is to
prevent the world from discovering the true culprit for the increase in
microcephaly in Brazil, namely the larvicide Pyriproxyfen, which is a
chemical of extraordinary importance to the UN system because it is a
vital component of covert sterilization to the WHO’s Global Technical
Strategy (GTS) for Malaria 2016-2030 (Figure 19).
e Global Technical Strategy (GTS) for Malaria is a masterplan not
only for Malaria eradication but also, and more importantly, for
bringing and keeping the entire developing world down to replacement
level fertility. It is indispensable to the depopulation lobby as it
provides them with a plausible cover for sterilizing hard-to-reach
people in remote places and in the ower of their reproductive lives all
around the world and on a continuous basis; places and people that
have so far escaped the tentacles of the UN system.
Figure 19: Cumulative probability of malaria death, % and per 1,000
population, 2010.
e Zika virus and the Aedes aegypti mosquito serve as scapegoats
for microcephaly and allow governments in the region and the UN to
capitalize on the fear and confusion generated by this unintended crisis
to accomplish much-needed environmental, demographic and
legislative objectives. at Zika cannot possibly be the cause of
microcephaly is claried by the total absence of microcephaly in
neighboring Colombia, which registered thousands of Zika infections
but no cases of microcephaly. Furthermore, the likely cause of
microcephaly, Pyriproxyfen, has already been identied by ABRASCO,
an organization of Brazilian doctors, who have demanded urgent
epidemiological studies but whose demands have so far fallen on deaf
ears [31].
So the question is not whether Zika causes microcephaly, but rather
why the Brazilian Ministry of Health, acting on the recommendation
of the WHO, has been applying Pyroproxyfen to the drinking-water
reservoirs of the people of northeast Brazil, the region where the
incidence of microcephaly shot up?
e ocial answer is that the Brazilian Ministry of Health puts
Pyroproxyfen into the drinking-water reservoirs of its citizens since the
middle of 2014 on the recommendation of PAHO and the WHO to
inhibit the growth of mosquito larvae and thus provide vector control
for the spread of Dengue and Malaria.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 11 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
e Ministry of Health and the WHO know that Pyroproxyfen is
teratogenic and causes malformations in young mosquitoes that
prevent the development of adult insect characteristics and of
reproductive organs to stop the proliferation of the Aedes aegypti
mosquito. But neither the Ministry of Health nor the UN is about to
recognize that the damage done to mosquito development from larva
to pupa to adult by Pyroproxyfen is also done to humans in their
development from zygote to embryo to foetus. ey are not about to
admit it because Pyroproxyfen, a known sterilizant [32], is crucial to
the population control agenda and 300,000 Pyroproxyfen-coated bed
nets hang in every hut and over every bed of the UN Millennium
Villages Project [33]. ey are not about to admit it because this
chemical and the bed nets coated with it are manufactured by
Sumimoto Chemicals, a strategic partner of Monsanto, the death
company par excellence and the corporate pivot of the depopulation
lobby, and because it is known that the longevity and survival rates of
organisms treated with Pyroproxyfen are shorter and have signicantly
fewer progeny [34] just as it is known that male ies sterilized with
Pyroproxyfen can transfer their sterility to females by sexual
intercourse, according to Sumimoto Laboratory’s own research [35]
and the same eect can be inferred for humans. ey will not admit it
because a billion bed nets manufactured by Vestergaard and subsidized
with UN funds are coated with a similar poison, Deltamethrin [36],
which is a known neurotoxin and endocrine disruptor and listed as
such by the EPA, as well as a known suppresser of spermatogenesis
[37], but that nevertheless cover the beds of just as many families
throughout the developing world. ey will not admit it because the
WHO mandates the use of these sterilizing, mutagenic and
carcinogenic pyrethroid-based LLINs (long-lasting insecticidal nets) in
its 2012 Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management in Malaria
Vectors [38].
It is a lot more convenient to blame Zika then to assume
responsibility for causing congenital malformations to an entire
generation of children in the process of sterilizing them and their
parents on the sly, especially when this poor excuse can be milked for
all its worth to accomplish other hidden goals. Well, let’s just see what
these goals are.
Protect the Amazon?
Brazil and Colombia are purportedly the most aected nations by
the Zika virus for a reason, namely they surround the Amazon Basin,
which needs to be protected from human intrusion because it
represents the right lung of the planet and its most prolic incubator of
life.
Whether the rate of infection is as large as it has been reported and
whether it is spreading as rapidly as medical authorities maintain it is
irrelevant since the fear generated by a real or invented pandemic is the
same so long as the mainstream media does its part to whip up mass
hysteria.
e existing cattle ranchers and farmers, who are responsible for
deforesting the Amazon at a rate of 15,757 square kilometers a year
since 1977, an abuse so large as to represent c. 18% of the world’s total
annual deforestation, will be driven out by fear of infection and the
sterilizing chemicals used to presumably combat the carriers of disease.
If women are kept away or sent out of the Amazon for fear of
infection, then the regional population will not grow and the Amazon
will be protected.
Furthermore, potentially new human intruders will think twice
before venturing into the world’s most mosquito-infested region to
slash and burn so as to live o cattle rearing or subsistence farming.
e fear of infection and microcephaly, amplied by rumors, that may
just prove right, about the release of genetically modied Oxitec
mosquitoes capable of spreading an embryo-death gene that leads to
human sterility [39], will unburden governments in the region from
the politically dicult and nancially prohibitive task of safeguarding
the territorial integrity and rich biodiversity of the Amazon, the world’s
most crucial natural habitat.
All conservation eorts have failed. is, it is hoped, will succeed
and will allow Brazilian President Dilma Rousse to keep a promise
that she made in 2015 at the UN, namely to eliminate illegal
deforestation and restore 120,000 square kilometers of lost Amazonian
rainforest by 2030 [40].
Considering that more than half of the world’s rainforest’s have been
lost to deforestation in the past half-century, that Brazil has the world’s
second-highest rates of deforestation (aer Indonesia), that the
country’s leadership has made a rm commitment to stop and reverse
the trend, that Sustainable Development Goal 15 adopted by 193
countries pledges to “protect terrestrial ecosystems” by halting
deforestation and restoring degraded forests, that deforestation
accounts for nearly 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and that
Norwegian Prime Minister (from 2005 to 2013).
Jens Stoltenberg – a stalwart of the depopulation lobby and the
current Secretary General of NATO (which coordinates the ultra-
secret and global geoengineering program that sprays millions of tons
of metal oxides in the upper atmosphere to prevent global warming) –
pledged in 2008 to donate 1 billion US dollars to the then newly
established Amazon Fund on the condition that this money would go
to projects aimed at slowing down the deforestation of the Amazon
rainforest, one can safely conclude that this crisis has been engineered
at the highest global governance level to accomplish geopolitically
important goals, and none other is more important than the
preservation of the planet’s vital ecosystems.
To strengthen the case for protecting the Amazon a perceived rise in
infectious diseases and Zika are being blamed on deforestation and
other environmental factors [41].
Change abortion laws and sexual behavior and mandate
sexual education
No sooner was the Zika outbreak announced that calls for legislative
changes to abortion laws throughout Latin America began appearing
in newspapers around the region and throughout the world and are
being echoed with increasing frequency by NGOs and politicians
despite the fact that Brazil’s and Columbia’s total fertility rates have
been below replacement level for the past decade. is begs the
question why?
With chemical methods of population control via endocrine
disruptors inserted in water, food and beverages being phased out, and
in the absence of legal restrictions on fertility, governments need
permissive abortion laws and high contraceptive prevalence rates if
they are to eventually abandon covert methods of population control
for overt legislation that will allow them to keep the total fertility rate
at or below replacement level legally and honorably until such time as
optimal population levels are reached (Figure 20).
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 12 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
Latin America being primarily Roman Catholic a strong pro-life
stance has prevented changes to the legal code and most countries in
the region have restrictive abortion laws that either prohibit abortion
in any and all circumstances (El Salvador, Nicaragua, and the
Dominican Republic) or allow it only in medical emergencies to save
the mother’s life (Venezuela, Brazil, Guatemala).
Figure 20: Contraceptive prevalence in countries in zika.
In this restrictive legal environment, contraceptives are not always
available or aordable and the contraceptive prevalence rates are
insucient to reach and maintain replacement level fertility.
e numbers in the table above are deceivingly high as they include
modern and traditional methods of birth control and the latter are not
very reliable.
To force much-needed legislation through, the authorities are
building momentum in favor of legalizing abortion by frightening
people with Zika, mosquitoes and microcephaly, on the one hand, and
angering them with futile health directives that advise women to delay
pregnancy, on the other hand; knowing very well that couples cannot
delay or prevent pregnancy since contraceptives are neither readily
available nor aordable to most people in this Catholic and poor
region.
Even before the WHO declared Zika an international health
emergency, national governments began warning their people to delay
pregnancy.
To date, Brazil, Ecuador, Colombia, Jamaica and El Salvador have all
asked their citizens to delay pregnancy, the latter for two years [42].
Leaving all pretenses aside, Columbia’s health minister stated “that
a conrmation of Zika infection and possible microcephaly may allow
women to qualify for abortions, which might otherwise be illegal” [43].
To soen public opinion to the idea of abortion the media ashes
images of babies with severe microcephaly at every opportunity and it
could very well be that the apparent increase in congenital
malformations is greatly exaggerated to create a state of tension and
panic.
e prospect of having to raise a child with microcephaly is
unappealing to most people and this makes abortion that much more
palatable. If enough parents demand abortion the political
establishment will duly abide and even religious objections will be
overlooked.
Indeed medical authorities have started to backtrack on the true
number of Zika infections that until recently have been grossly over-
reported.
At the end of January, the Brazilian Ministry of Health reported
3,760 suspected cases of microcephaly under investigation of which
709 have been rejected for being inaccurately diagnosed and only 404
were conrmed, 98% of which are concentrated in the north-east of
Brazil [44].
To weaken religious objections the UN system has also fashioned
three cases of Zika transmission through sexual contact and the CDC,
not to be outdone, has declared that it is investigating fourteen such
cases [45].
In all probability none of these cases is valid but the threat of sexual
transmission is needed to create a moral dilemma for conservative
Catholics and force the Church to change or at the very least soen its
teachings on birth control. To this end, Pope Francis was asked the
following on February 18 by a reporter on his ight back to Rome from
South America.
Paloma García Ovejero, Cadena COPE (Spain): Holy Father, for
several weeks there’s been a lot of concern in many Latin American
countries but also in Europe regarding the Zika virus. e greatest risk
would be for pregnant women. ere is anguish. Some authorities have
proposed abortion, or else to avoiding pregnancy.
As regards avoiding pregnancy, on this issue, can the Church take
into consideration the concept of “the lesser of two evils?”
Pope Francis: Abortion is not the lesser of two evils. It is a crime. It
is to throw someone out in order to save another. at’s what the Maa
does. It is a crime, an absolute evil. On the ‘lesser evil,’ avoiding
pregnancy, we are speaking in terms of the conict between the h
and sixth commandment. Paul VI, a great man, in a dicult situation
in Africa, permitted nuns to use contraceptives in cases of rape.
Don’t confuse the evil of avoiding pregnancy by itself, with abortion.
Abortion is not a theological problem, it is a human problem, and it is
a medical problem. You kill one person to save another, in the best case
scenario.
Or to live comfortably, no? It’s against the Hippocratic oaths doctors
must take. It is an evil in and of itself, but it is not a religious evil in the
beginning, no, it’s a human evil. en obviously, as with every human
evil, each killing is condemned.
On the other hand, avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil. In
certain cases, as in this one, or in the oneauthormentioned of Blessed
Paul VI, it was clear.authorwould also urge doctors to do their utmost
to nd vaccines against these two mosquitoes that carry this disease.
is needs to be worked on [46].
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 13 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
Pope Francis stood his ground on abortion but wisely soened his
position on contraceptives thus paving the way for at least facilitating
contraceptive use throughout the region, which is indeed the only way
forward both for the region and for the world.
Beyond Latin America and the realm of Catholicism calls for sexual
education in schools have become louder and more aggressive. In a
coordinated fashion, the mainstream media in the Arab world features
stories of insucient sexual education in the United States to implant
the idea at home without oending Muslims in the Middle East where
the struggle against high fertility lags behind UN targets [47].
Fear and not just sexual education is promoted to alter mating
habits and encourage the use of contraceptives. Despite any evidence,
health authorities throughout the world maintain that the virus can be
spread through sexual intercourse for three months aer infection.
is misconception is disseminated for one and one reason only,
namely to get people to use protection during sexual activity in order
to prevent unwanted pregnancies and thus halt population growth.
Suppress fertility rates and eliminate regional disparities
at health authority’s use fear of Zika to combat population growth
is fairly obvious despite great eorts to conceal this objective.
Equally obvious is why Brazil singled out the northeast of the
country to launch a chemical attack on human fertility.
e national total fertility rate of Brazil (Figure 21) is safely below
replacement level but national statistics fail to reveal regional
dierences.
Figure 21: Brazil total fertility.
And Brazil’s regional dierences are signicant. e northeast,
which has the poorest and the brownest (62.5%) people in the country,
also has signicantly higher fertility rates than the rest of the country,
approximately 2.4 children per woman compared to only 1.6 in the
south where the population is 75% white.
It is also the primary source of migrants for the Amazon region and
the Brazilian government has pledged to stop and reverse the
deforestation of the Amazon Basin.
e fear of Zika and the use of sterilizing chemicals in water
(larvicide Pyroproxyfen) and air (fumigant Malathion [48]) to
presumably act as vector control for the Zika-carrying Aedes aegypti
mosquito allow the Brazilian government to level the fertility scale
between the south and the north.
Secure funding
Knowledge of covert depopulation methods is increasing rapidly
due to the inability of state actors to censor the Internet and control the
means of mass communication.
Although the mainstream media is fully controlled and the
alternative media is largely controlled the social media allows people
across the world to share and exchange information that is otherwise
restricted and privileged.
is has diminished the ability of governments to obtain funding
for covert depopulation programmes from parliaments and legislatures
and has forced administrations and the UN-system to rely on
billionaires and corporations, who have duly lled in the void.
It also impairs the ability of the UN system to close the gap in per
capita spending for health services to reduce maternal and child
mortality as well as child undernutrition between the developed and
the developing world, which is a strategic priority for the sustainability
agenda, and indeed a worthy one.
Europe for instance spends c. $1,400 per person for health care
while Africa barely manages $140 dollars [49].
e transfer of funding responsibilities from state to private actors
also has the advantage of protecting the newest strategies of
depopulation by limiting their knowledge to a smaller number of
individuals who are outside public oce and scrutiny and therefore
not handicapped by oversight and transparency rules.
Last, the political establishment is distancing itself from the core of
the depopulation lobby perhaps in advance of disclosure so as to limit
ultimate responsibility for genocide to a very small number of
individuals and thus restore the credibility of the state.
e largest single donor to the WHO, surpassing all governments, is
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is also the largest funding
source to the GAVI alliance.
While Bill Gates can donate billions at a time and boast the largest
single charitable donation in history [50] President Obama has to take
advantage of opportunities created by manufactured pandemics to beg
for far more modest sums [51].
To ll the gap in population control funds le by retreating
governments, the depopulation lobby, led by Bill Gates and Warren
Buet, started in 2010 under the Giving Pledge campaign to pool the
wealth of other billionaires who agreed to donate a good proportion of
their fortunes to charity.
As of April 2012, 81 billionaires have “committed to giving at least
half of their fortunes to charity” [52] and more have joined them since.
Unfortunately, the charity envisioned by these individuals has more
in common with genocide and less with concern for the welfare of
individuals, which is why their billions are used to lower the
population and fertility bars two rungs lower by the end of the 21st
century (Figure 22), as planned by UN and national technocrats and
revealed by their latest projections.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 14 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
e best intentions do not justify genocide and crimes against
humanity, especially since these crimes committed as social
interventions are now directed primarily at the most vulnerable
members of society, children and the elderly, so the self-appointed
guardians of life and death can balance their economic and
demographic books.
Figure 22: World population by level of fertility over time
(1950-2100).
Conclusion
e clash between health care and public health priorities and
prerogatives, the former being dictated by the individual and the latter
by the state, can no longer be hidden. is clash has shattered the
public’s trust in the healthcare system and in government itself and has
created an explosive animosity between the 1% and the 99%.
All epidemics and pandemics of the past 30 years are fabrications of
the UN system and its partners in crime at the national level for the
purpose of lowering births below the magic line of replacement level
fertility and, more recently, also for limiting life to an economically
acceptable and environmentally sustainable age.
Instead of resolving the conict between individual and
international prerogatives by bringing the no longer secret
depopulation program out into the open and legislating replacement
level fertility, the 1% has decided to deny the world’s 7.3 billion people
their fundamental rights for one more generation and to get away with
mass murder for just as long it has devised a new method of preventing
birth and controlling death that is more sophisticated and harder to
detect because it uses genetics and gene programming in addition to
chemistry and endocrine disruptors to damage human fertility and
longevity through intrinsic and extrinsic pathways at the same time.
e strategy of depopulation has evolved and has been accelerated
and amplied. Having exposed the covert chemical, biological,
psychosocial and economic methods of population control, and having
destroyed our governments’ cover of secrecy, we have shut down their
ability to commit genocide by turning man against man through the
misuse of the institutions of state, concealment of vital information,
abuse of the rule of law, perversion of science, falsication of facts,
misappropriation of public funds, and the debasement of executive
powers.
Instead of changing tack and empowering us so that we assume
responsibility over restrictions on fertility, which would have brought
the program of population control back to legality, our governments
have once again done the unthinkable and have taken the last possible
step towards illegality.
No longer able to turn man against man, thus to turn us against
each other, because they have lost the ability to manipulate us into
poisoning, impoverishing and imprisoning one another, our genocidal
governments have decided to turn nature against man, so as to make
nature our mortal enemy.
Vaccines now represent the newest battle line between the 1% and
the 99% and between international and individual prerogatives. In the
21st century it is the needle not the bomb that causes death and disease
at an unimaginable scale and at an unpredictable cost to the genetic
endowment of mankind.
But although the weapon has changed the goal remains the same, to
stop and reverse our numbers so that by the end of the 21st century
everybody will live just as long, just as sterile, and just as sick.
e planet will be saved but mankind destroyed.
References
1. Cha AE (2016) Beyond Zika: e terrifying map of things that keep NIH’s
infectious diseases director up at night. e Washington Post.
2. (2014) Global, regional, and national age–sex specic all-cause and cause-
specic mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. e Lancet 385:
117-171.
3. (2015) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years
lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188
countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
Disease Study 2013. e Lancet 386: 743–800.
4. Kevin GM (2015) e Subversion of Medicine and Public Health by
International Security Prerogatives. Epidemyology (Sunnyvle) 5: 4.
5. Paul P (1968) Humanae Vitae: On the Regulation of Life. Libreria Editrice
Vaticana.
6. Chan M (2009) Swine inuenza: Statement by WHO Director-General.
7. (2014) WHO statement on the meeting of the International Health
Regulations Emergency Committee concerning the international spread
of wild poliovirus.
8. (2014) WHO Statement on the 1st meeting of the IHR Emergency
Committee on the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
9. (2016) WHO Director-General summarizes the outcome of the
Emergency Committee regarding clusters of microcephaly and Guillain-
Barré syndrome. WHO statement on the rst meeting of the
International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee on Zika
virus and observed increase in neurological disorders and neonatal
malformations.
10. (2014) WHO A mass sterilization exercise’: Kenyan doctors nd anti-
fertility agent in UN tetanus vaccine. Life Site.
11. (2010) WHO Weekly epidemiological record/Relevé épidémiologique
hebdomadaire 87: 461-476.
12. Simonsen L, Reichert TA, Viboud C, Blackwelder WC, Taylor RJ, et al.
(2005) Impact of Inuenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US
Elderly Population. Archives of Internal Medicine 165: 265-272.
13. (2012) WHO Inuenza vaccine use.
14. (2010) WHO Urgent Support for Developing Countries' Responses to the
H1N1 Inuenza Pandemic.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 15 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
15. (2013) CBS 60 Minutes "Swine Flu 1976”.
16. Galalae KM (2015) e Epidemiology of Genocide: Medicine as the
Handmaiden of Population Control. Speech given at the “3rd
International Conference of Epidemiology and Emerging Diseases” in
Valencia, Spain.
17. (2016) e U.S. Special Virus.
18. Graves B (2004) AIDS is man-made.
19. Galalae KM (2013) Killing Us Soly: Causes and Consequences of the
Global Depopulation Policy. Progressive Press.
20. (2010) Data 360. Life Expectancy.
21. (2015) Overshoot Index: Population Matters.
22. (2014) WHO statement on the meeting of the International Health
Regulations Emergency Committee concerning the international spread
of wild poliovirus.
23. Bruce RA (2014) Making history: from a public health emergency to a
polio-free world. Polio Eradication Initiative, World Health Organization.
24. (2016) WHO IPV Introduction, OPV Withdrawal and Routine
Immunization Strengthening.
25. (2012)TFR data and graphs from the U.N. Department of Economic and
Social Aairs (DESA).
26. Kevin GM (2014) Peace Without Poison (Amazon, 2014) 1: ISBN-10.
27. Jegede AS (2007) What Led to the Nigerian Boycott of the Polio
Vaccination Campaign? PLoS Med 4: e73.
28. Hikim APS, Swerdlo RS (1999) Hormonal and genetic control of germ
cell apoptosis in the testis. Reviews of Reproduction 4: 38-47.
29. Dix DJ, Allen JW, Collins BW, Morio C, Nakamura N, et al. (1996)
Targeted gene disruption of Hsp70-2 results in failed meiosis, germ cell
apoptosis, and male infertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 93: 3264-3268.
30. Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR (1972) Apoptosis: a basic biological
phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. British
Journal of Cancer 26: 239-57.
31. (2016) Abrasco eme Groups produce Technical Note with reections ,
questions and guidance propositions: Technical note on microcephaly
and vector related diseases Aedes aegypti : the dangers of approaches with
larvicides and chemical sprays – fogging.
32. Oda SS, El-Maddawy ZK (2012) Protective eect of vitamin E and
selenium combination on deltamethrin-induced reproductive toxicity in
male rats. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology 64: 813-819.
33. (2014) Sumimoto Chemical donates 300,000 bed nets.
34. Tong-Xian L (2003) Eects of a juvenile hormone analog, pyriproxyfen,
on rips tabaci (ysanoptera: ripidae). Pest Management Science 59:
904-912.
35. Kawada H, Senbo S, Abe Y (1992) Eects of pyriproxyfen on the
reproduction of the housey, Musca domestica, and the German
cockroach, Blattella germanica. Medical entomology and zoology 43:
169-175.
36. (2015) PermaNet® by Vestergaard.
37. El-Gohary M, Awara WM, Nassar S, Hawas S (1999) Deltamethrin-
induced testicular apoptosis in rats: the protective eect of nitric oxide
synthase inhibitor. Toxicology 132: 1-8.
38. (2012) WHO 2012 Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management in
Malaria Vectors.
39. Shimatsu Y (2016) CDC-Oxford ‘Death Gene’ Is Key To e Brazilian
Babies Riddle.
40. Tavener B (2015) Brazil Pledges on Climate Change, Zero Deforestation
Are a ‘Crushing Disappointment. Tipping Point.
41. Mooney C (2016) e hidden environmental factors behind the spread of
Zika and other devastating diseases. e Washington Post.
42. Ahmed A (2016) El Salvador’s Advice on Zika Virus: Don’t Have Babies.
e New York Times.
43. Cha AE (2016) Why Zika is a ticking ‘time bomb’ for Latin America. e
Washington Post.
44. Saúde P (2016) Boletim: Saúde investiga 3,670 casos suspeitos de
microcefalia no país.
45. Dennis B (2016) CDC investigating 14 potential cases of sexually
transmitted Zika. e Washington Post.
46. Catholic News Agency (2016) Full text of Pope Francis' in-ight interview
from Mexico to Rome.
47. Newton C (2016) Zika virus in Texas: A sex education problem?
Abstinence-only curriculum in some Texas schools may be challenged in
wake of new sexually transmitted Zika virus cases. Aljazeera.
48. Volk M, Jaklič H, Zorn B, Peterlin B (2011) Association between male
infertility and genetic variability at the PON1/2 and GSTM1/T1 gene loci.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23: 105-110.
49. (2015) WHO: Health in 2015: from MDGs, Millennium Development
Goals to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals.
50. (2010) Bill Gates makes world's biggest ever single charitable donation
with £6.2bn for vaccines for children.
51. Aljazeera (2016) White House to seek $1.8bn to combat Zika. Funds to go
to expanding mosquito-control programmes, speeding up vaccine
research and helping aected countries.
52. Hungton P (2012) Warren Buet, Bill Gates Giving Pledge gets 12 more
billionaires to commit over half of their fortunes.
Citation: Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population
Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
Page 16 of 16
Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)
ISSN:2161-1165 ECR, Open Access Volume 6 • Issue 1 • 1000232
