Content uploaded by Juan M Fregeneda-Grandes
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Juan M Fregeneda-Grandes on Oct 24, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Juan M Fregeneda-Grandes
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Juan M Fregeneda-Grandes on Oct 24, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(2) 2016, 91
* Corresponding author’s email: jmallg@unileon.es
NOTE
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
by Saprolegnia parasitica in Pseudochondrostoma
duriense (Coelho, 1985) (Cyprinidae)
ǯȱǯȱȬȘǰȱǯȱǯȱȬǰȱǯȱ£¤£Ȭ
Palacios, M. J. García-Iglesias and L. I. Pérez-Ordoyo
Animal Health Department. Veterinary Faculty. University of
àǯȱȱȱ£ǰȱȦǯȱŘŚŖŝŗȱàǯȱ
Abstract
ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱSaprolegnia parasiticaȱȱȱ¢ȱęȱPseudochondrostoma duriense
ȱȱȱȱȱęȱǯȱP. durienseȱȱȱȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱǻǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱǯȱȱȱȬȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱęǰȱȱȱȱȱǯ
Saprolegnia parasiticaȱȱȱȱȱSap-
rolegnia (Kingdom Chromista, Class Oomy-
ǼȱȱȱȬȱęǰȱȱǰȱ
ȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱ
by Neish and Hughes (1980), Bruno et al. (2011)
ȱ£ȱȱǯȱǻŘŖŗŚǼȱȱȱȱȱ
ęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǯȱ
ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱęȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱPseudochon-
drostoma duriense (Coelho, 1985), the northern
straight-mouth nase whose Spanish name is
“boga del Duero”.
ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱŘŖŗŗȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ
ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱǰȱȱȱĚȱ
ȱȱ¢ȱȱàȱȱȬȱǯȱ
ȱęȱȱȱȱȱĴ¢ȱȱ
spread over their head, trunk, caudal peduncle
ȱęȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¢ȱ
ȱȱę¢ȱ¢ȱSaprolegnia spp. Some
ęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ
£ǰȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱěǰȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱęȱǻȱ
ŗǰȱǼǯȱȱȱěȱęȱȱȱȱ-
ȱĚȱĚ¡ȱȱ¢ȱȱ£ȱȱ
Ĵȱǯ
ȱěȱęȱǻ¡ȱǰȱȱǼȱ
were caught. Their average length was 17.9 ± 3.4
ȱȱȱşŗȱƹȱŚśǯŘȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ
lesions were observed under the microscope
ȱȱȱȱĴȱǯȱ
Others were cultured on glucose peptone agar
(GPA) with chloramphenicol (0.05 mg mL-1) at
ŘŖȱķȱȱȱȬȱǯȱSaproleg-
92, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(2) 2016
nia isolates were subcultured onto GPA with
hemp seeds (Cannabis sativaǼȱȱ¢ȱ-
ȱȱ£ȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱęȱȱȱȱǰȱȱŝȱ
ķȱȱȱŘŖȱķǰȱȱȱȱȱȱ
zoospores and sexual reproduction (oogonia)
(Willoughby, 1978); and to observe the long
hairs and indirect germination on the second-
¢ȱ¢ǰȱ¢ȱȱǰȱȱȱĴȱȱ
ȱȱǻ¢ǰȱŗşŞśǼǯȱęȱȱ
Saprolegnia parasiticaȱȱȱȱȱȱ-
phological characteristics: long hairs on the
secondary cysts, indirect (retracted) germination
ȱȱȱŝȱķȱǻȱǼȱǻ-
loughby, 1985; Diéguez-Uribeondo et al., 2007).
ȱȱȱ¢ǰȱȱȱ
spleen were grown on tryptone soy agar (TSA),
ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱŗŚȱęǯȱȱȱȱȱ
ęȱ¢ȱȱȱ·¡ȱțȱ
2 System using the GN reagent card and then
ȱęȱȱȱȱ¡ȱ
ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¢ȱȱŗŜȱȱ
GyrB genes and using BLAST on GenBank.
A histopathological study was also carried out
on the skin and eyes with lesions, together with
ȱ¢ǰȱǰȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ęǯȱȱȱȱę¡ȱȱŗŖƖȱěȱ
ȱȱȱȱĜǰȱȱȱ
tissue sections were stained with haematoxy-
ȱȱǰȱȱȬěȱǻǼȱȱ
Gomori methenamine silver (GMS).
ȱȱȱ cutaneous lesions
and signs described above, necropsy showed
no lesions in internal organs. Ovaries and
ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱęȱȱ
ȱȱȱǯȱȱ¢ȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ-
ȱĴȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ£-
ȱȱSaprolegnia spp., and Saprolegnia
parasiticaȱǻ¡ȱȱŝȱķȱȱŘŖȱķǰȱȱȱ
hairs and indirect germination on its second-
¢ȱ£ȱ¢Ǽȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱȱǯȱȱ
ȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱęȱǻȱȱ
colony morphology). The seven selected iso-
ǰȱȱȱȱȱęǰȱȱęȱȱ
Shewanella putrefaciensȱǻŗȱęǼǰȱAeromonas media
ǻŗȱęǼǰȱAeromonas sobriaȱǻŘȱęǼȱȱAeromonas
bestiariumȱǻŘȱęǼȱȱȱǰȱȱ
Aeromonas sobriaȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǻŗȱęǼǯȱ
ȱȱęȱS. parasiticaȱȱȱȱȱ
Figure 1. ȱȱȱĴ¢ȱȱȱ¢ȱSaprolegnia parasitica on skin (head, trunk, caudal
Ǽǰȱ¢ȱȱęȱȱPseudochondrostoma duriense (A, B).
AB
Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(2) 2016, 93
internal organs (kidney, spleen or liver) in bac-
teriological cultures on TSA.
Histopathological examination showed non-
ȱȬȱȱȱȱȱȱ
epidermis (Figure 2A). There was also marked
ęȱ£ȱǰȱ¢ȱ£ǰȱ
¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱęȱȱȱȱȱǻȱŘǼǯȱ
Additionally, there was ulcerative keratocon-
ȱȱȱǰȱȱȱȱȱ
anterior and posterior corneal epithelium and
ȱĚ¢ȱęȱȱȱǰȱ
conjunctiva, iris, ciliary body and the anterior
ȱȱȱ¢ȱǻȱŘǼǯȱȱȱȱȱ
skin, muscle tissue and eyeball were associated
ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¢ȱȱ
with PAS and GMS staining (Figure 2A, B, C).
No histopathological lesions or hyphae were
seen in internal organs (kidney, liver, spleen
and intestines).
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
¡ȱȱȱSaprolegnia spp. in
ȱȱȱęǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ęȱ
degenerative changes. They have also noted
ȱȱ¢ȱȱěȱȱȱǰȱ
with any spreading to other internal tissues
being rarer (Bly et al., 1992; Copland and Wil-
loughby, 1982; Fregeneda-Grandes et al., 2001;
Hatai and Hoshiai, 1992; Neish, 1977; Nolard-
Tintigner, 1973; Srivastava et al., 1994; Xu and
Rogers, 1991).
The genus Pseudochondrostoma (Cyprinidae)
contains three species, P. duriense, P. polylepis
and P. willkommii (Robalo et al., 2007), which are
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǯȱ
P. durienseȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱ
ęǰȱȱȱȱȬȱȱȱȱ
ȱǻȱȱǼȱȱȱȱȱ
the rivers Duero and Miño (Douro and Minho)
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ
while the species P. polylepis and P. willkommii
ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
the Iberian Peninsula, respectively (FishBase,
ŘŖŗśDzȱǰȱŘŖŗśǼǯȱȱȱȱ-
ȱěȱPseudochondrostoma duriense.
ȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱ¢ǰȱ
ȱěǯȱ¢ȱȱȱ¢ȱ
ȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱConfederación
¤ęȱȱ yielded values within
ȱȱǻǯȱǯǼǯȱȱęȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ
having spawned and others being on the point
ȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ-
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱǰȱȱȱ
¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
Ěǯȱȱȱěȱȱȱȱ-
taneous skeletal musculature, but not internal
ǯȱȱȱS. parasiticaȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ
hyphae or histopathological lesions, so that it
may have been due to S. parasitica being in the
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱ¢ǯȱȱȱȱȱ
internal organs belonged to various species
and were not associated with any lesions in the
ȱȱȱȱęǰȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ
ȱȱS. parasitica.
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
saprolegniosis in the wild brown trout Salmo
94, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(2) 2016
Ĵ L. caused by Saprolegnia parasiticaȱǻ-
¢ȱęȱȱSaprolegnia sp. asexual or
Saprolegnia diclina Type 1) in the upper stretch
ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱǻȬȱȱ
¤£ȬÇ£ǰȱŗşŞŝDzȱȬȱȱȱ
al., 2000, 2009), but never in P. duriense. There
ȱȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ
ȱȱSaprolegnia was not isolated or iden-
ęǰȱȱȱȱȱChondrostoma pol-
ylepisȱȱȱȱȱȱ£ȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱȱǻ£¤£ȱ
de Canales et al., 2001). Currently C. polylepis
ȱęȱȱPseudochondrostoma polylepis
ǻȱȱǯǰȱŘŖŖŝǼȱȱȱȱȱ
ęȱȱ¢ȱȱP. willkommii and not
P. polylepis ȱȱ C. polylepis in the river
Chanza (SIBIC, 2015). It would seem that the
ȱȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱ¢ȱSaprolegnia parasiticaȱ-
ȱȱȱPseudochondrostoma duriense
(“boga del Duero”).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported through research
ȱŘŖŗŖȬŗŞśŜŘȱȱȱȱMinis-
terio de Ciencia e Innovación. C.G.P. received a
ȱȱȱConsejería de Educaciónȱȱ
the Regional Government Junta de Castilla y
LeónǰȱȬęȱ¢ȱȱȱȱǯȱ
Figure 2. Saprolegniosis lesions on skin,
ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱPseudochondrostoma
duriense (GMS stain): (A) Skin: Saprolegnia parasitica
hyphae in the dermis (ÎǼȱ ȱ ¢ȱ
ęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǻƇ)
ȱ¢ȱǻȣǼǯȱǻǼȱȱȱDZȱ
¢¢ȱ£ȱ¢ȱęȱ£ȱȱȱ
£ȱȱȱ¢ȱǻȣǼȱȱȱǻƅǼȱȱ
ȱȱęDzȱ¢ȱȱS. parasitica associated
with muscular lesion (Î). (C) Eye: Ulcerative keratitis
ȱȱȱ£ȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ
the anterior and posterior corneal epithelium (Ƈ)
ȱĚ¢ȱȱęȱȱȱȱǻȣǼǰȱ
ȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǻƅǼDzȱ¢ȱȱS.
parasitica on the cornea (Î).
A B
C
Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(2) 2016, 95
We wish to express our gratitude to the Servicio
Territorial de Medio Ambiente and the Laboratorio
Regional de Sanidad Animal de Leónȱȱȱ-
al Government Junta de Castilla and Leónȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱęȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱȱȱŘȱ¢ǯ
References
Ȭȱȱ ȱ ¤£ȬÇ£ȱ ȱ
(1987). Saprolegniosis en la trucha común
(ȱĴ L.) de los ríos de León (España).
Medicina Veterinaria 4, 181-184.
Bly JE, Lawson LA, Dale DJ, Szalai AJ,
Durborow RM and Clem LW (1992). Winter
ȱȱȱęǯȱDiseases
of Aquatic Organisms 13, 155-164.
Bruno DW, Van West P and Beakes GW (2011).
Saprolegnia and other Oomycetes. In “Fish
diseases and disorders, Volume 3: Viral,
bacterial and fungal infections” (P.T.K.
Woo and D.W. Bruno, Eds.), pp. 669-720.
ǰȱǰȱǯȱȬŗřDZȱşŝŞȱŗȱ
84593 554 2.
Copland JW and Willoughby LG (1982).
ȱ¢ȱȱSaprolegniaȱȱȱ
Anguilla anguilla L. elvers. Journal of Fish
Diseases 5, 421-428.
Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Fregeneda-Grandes
JM, Cerenius L, Pérez-Iniesta E, Aller-
Gancedo JM, Tellería MT, Söderhäll K
ȱÇȱȱǻŘŖŖŝǼǯȱȬȱȱ
the enigmatic species complex Saprolegnia
diclina-Saprolegnia parasitica based on
morphological, physiological and molecular
data. Fungal Genetics and Biology 44, 585-601.
FishBase (2015). Available in ǯęǯ
org. [1 June 2015].
ȬȱǰȱȬ£¤£ȱȱ
and Aller-Gancedo JM (2009). Prevalence
ȱȱȱȱSaprolegnia
parasiticaȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ
ȱĴ. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms
83, 17-22.
Ȭȱǰȱ¤£ȬÇ£ȱȱȱ
Aller-Gancedo JM (2000). Ultrastructural
¢ȱȱSaprolegnia secondary zoospore
¢ȱȱ ȱ ȱȱ
brown trout, ȱ Ĵ L., and river
water indicates two distinct morphotypes
amongst long-spined isolates. Journal of Fish
Diseases 23, 147-160.
Ȭȱ ǰȱ ¤£Ȭ
Díez M and Aller Gancedo JM (2001).
Experimental pathogenicity in rainbow
trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss ǻǼǰȱȱ
ȱȱ¢ȱȱȬȱ
Saprolegniaȱȱȱȱȱ
brown trout, ȱĴ L., and river water.
Journal of Fish Diseases 24, 351-359.
£¤£ȱ ȱ ȱ ǰȱ Ȭ£ȱ ǰȱ
£¤£ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ
ȱ ǻŘŖŖŗǼǯȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ
populations. Ciencias Marinas 27, 125-137.
Gozlan RE, Marshall WL, Lilje O, Jessop CN,
Gleason FH and Andreou D (2014). Current
ȱȱȱȬȱ
ȱ ȱ ęDZȱ ȱ ȱ ǵǯȱ
Frontiers in Microbiology/Aquatic Microbiology
5, article 62, 1-16.
Hatai K and Hoshiai G (1992). Mass mortality
in cultured coho salmon (Oncorhynchus
kisutch) due to Saprolegnia parasistica Coker.
Journal of Wildlife Diseases 28, 532-536.
Neish GA (1977). Observations on saprolegniasis
ȱȱ¢ȱǰȱOncorhynchus nerka
(Walbaum). Journal of Fish Biology 10, 513-
522.
Neish GA and Hughes GC (1980). “Diseases of
ęǯȱȱŜDZȱȱȱȱęȄ.
TFH Publications Inc, Neptune, NJ. ISBN
0 87666 504 0.
Nolard-Tintigner N (1973). Etude experimentale
sur l’epidemiologie et la pathogenie de la
saprolegniose chez Lebistes reticulatus Peters
et Xiphophorus helleri Heckel. Acta Zoologica
et Pathologica Antverpiensia 57, 1-127.
Robalo JI, Carvalho-Almada V, Levy A and
Doadrio I (2007). Re-examination and
¢¢ȱȱȱȱChondrostoma based
on mitochondrial and nuclear data and
96, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(2) 2016
ȱęȱȱśȱȱǯȱMolecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 42, 362-372.
SIBIC (2015). Carta piscícola española. Available
in www.cartapiscicola.es [5 December
2015].
Srivastava GC, Sinha SK and Prabhuji SK (1994).
ȱȱȱȱȱChela
laubucaȱǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ
mycoses. Current Science 66, 237-239.
¢ȱ ȱ ǻŗşŝŞǼǯȱ ȱ ȱ
ȱęȱȱDZȱȱȱ
analysis. Journal of Fish Diseases 1, 51-67.
Willoughby LG (1985). Rapid preliminary
ȱȱSaprolegniaȱȱęǯȱJournal of
Fish Diseases 8, 473-476.
Xu D and Rogers WA (1991). Electron
¢ȱȱȱ¢ȱSaprolegnia sp.
ȱȱęǯȱJournal of Aquatic Animal
Health 3, 63-69.