Content uploaded by Atheni Konar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Atheni Konar on Feb 07, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
2
Original Article
Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at ultrahigh dilution
prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation
Tandra Sarkar, M.Sc1,3; Atheni Konar, M.Sc1,3; Nirmal Chandra Sukul*, Ph.D1,2; Dipanwita
Majumdar, M.Sc4.; Achintya Singha, Ph.D4; Anirban Sukul, Ph.D1
1Sukul Institute of Homeopathic Research, Santiniketan, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Zoology, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, WB, India.
3Centre for Health Care Science and Technology, IIEST, Shibpur, WB, India.
4Department of Physics, Bose Institute, Kolkata, WB, India.
*Corresponding author. Email: ncsukul@gmail.com
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims at deciphering the nature of the water structure of two ultrahigh
diluted (UHD) homeopathic drugs by Laser Raman Spectroscopy.
Method: Two homeopathic drugs Sulphur and Natrum mur in three UHD 30cH, 200cH and 1000cH
were selected for the study. Raman spectra of the drugs and their medium (90% ethanol) were
obtained in the wave number region of 2600-3800 cm-1. The intensity ratio at vibration frequencies
between 3200 and 3420 (R1) and that between 3620 and 3420 (R2) was calculated for each UHD as
well as the control.
Results: Raman spectra shows differences in intensities in different UHDs and their control in the
stretching vibrations of CH and OH groups. The three UHDs of each drug show an inverse
relationship with respect to the R1 values. However, for R2 the relationship of UHD for each drug is
positive.
Conclusion: R1 provides information about the relative number of OH groups with strong and
weak hydrogen bonds. R2 suggests the relative number of OH groups with broken and weak
hydrogen bonds. Judged from R1 values the lower is the rank of UHD, the stronger is the H-bond of
the OH groups. In the light of R2 values, the higher is the UHD rank the more abundant is the free
OH groups. So, hydrogen bond strength and free OH groups together make an effective UHD rank
relating to Sulphur and Natrum mur.
Keywords: Sulphur, Natrum mur, high dilution, hydrogen bond, free OH.
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
3
Introduction
Drugs at ultrahigh dilution (UHD) are
frequently used in homeopathy. The
concentration of original drug molecules in
the 12th centesimal dilution reaches to a
dilution beyond 1024, therefore, UHDs
(beyond Avogadro) are likely to be devoid of
original drug molecules. However, the UHDs
show specificity in their biological effects as
reported in various studies. Viewed from the
perspective of their biological function the
UHDs appear different from each other and
also from their diluent medium, in spite of the
fact that their chemical composition is same
as ethanol and water. This paper attempts to
address the pertinent question, “What makes
them different from each other?” using Laser
Raman spectroscopy. Earlier studies using
NMR, electronic, vibrational and Raman
spectroscopy have shown differences in
UHDs1-7.
The difference has been attributed to the
difference in the hydrogen-bonded water
structures. But the exact nature of the water
structures in UHDs has not yet been
elucidated. Recently, an FTIR study by our
group revealed variation in free water
molecules and hydrogen bonding in different
UHD’s8.
The Raman spectroscopy is complementary
to Infrared spectroscopy9. For this, we have
studied Raman spectra of Natrum muriaticum
(Nat-m) and Sulphur (Sulph) in 30cH, 200cH,
and 1000cH potencies with a view to
exploring the differences among them. When
a beam of light passes through a transparent
material a small amount of radiation energy is
scattered. The scattered energy consists of
radiation mostly of incident frequency called
Raleigh scattering. However, certain discrete
frequencies above and below the frequency of
the incident beam are scattered, and this is
referred to as Raman Scattering.
When a sample of molecules, water-ethanol in
UHDs, is subjected to radiation beam of a
particular frequency the electric field
experienced by each molecule varies, and the
induced dipole also undergoes oscillations of
the same frequency. In addition, the molecule
undergoes internal motion such as vibration
or rotation. The vibrational or rotational
oscillation of the molecule would be
superimposed on the oscillating dipole of the
same molecule. This results in changes in the
polarization of the molecule. When a
molecule is put in a static electric field its
positively charged nucleus and negative
electrons are attracted to the negative and
positive pole of the field, respectively. This
causes an induced dipole moment in the
molecule, which is thus polarized.
In this study, we examined the vibrational
Raman Spectra of our samples using laser as a
source of radiation. The laser provides a
narrow monochromatic coherent beam. The
rare gas laser, here Argon, gives intensities
which are one million times greater than that
of sunlight10.
Materials and Methods
Medicines: UHDs of Natrum muriaticum (Nat-
m) and Sulphur (Sulph) in 30cH, 200cH, and
1000cH potencies were used for the
experiments. All drugs, purchased in sealed
vials from the local market, Kolkata, were
products of Dr. Reckeweg, Germany. The
drugs were in 90% ethanol as mentioned on
their label. The control consisted of 90%
ethanol prepared from absolute ethanol by
adding the appropriate volume of High
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
water. In this study, we did not use UHDs of
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
4
alcohol as a second control because UHD
alcohol may have some biological action.
Obviously, a drug cannot serve as a control
for another drug11. Aliquots of the control, as
well as the drugs, were mixed with an
appropriate volume of HPLC water to reduce
the ethanol content to 25%. The optical
density of all the samples was measured by a
UV-VIS spectrophotometer at 200nm and
found to be same.
Raman spectra: Raman measurements were
carried out at 23°C using a micro-Raman
setup (Lab Ram HR, Jobin Yvon) equipped
with an Argon ion laser of wavelength 488nm
and a CCD detector. The spectra were
collected within the wave number region of
2600-3800 cm-1 and analyzed after suitable
baseline correction. The experiments were
repeated thrice and the results were similar.
Here, we have considered the results of the
second experiment.
In water-ethanol solution OH bond undergoes
changes in integral intensity and contour
shape. The intensity ratio of vibrational
frequencies at 3200 and 3420 cm-1(R1)
provides information about the relative
number of OH groups with strong and weak
hydrogen bonds. The intensity ratio of the
modes at 3620 and 3420 cm-1(R2) suggests
the relative number of OH groups with
broken and weak hydrogen bonds12,13. In this
study, we have calculated these two ratios
from the Raman spectra of all the drug
samples and the control used.
Results
Raman spectra in the region of stretching
vibrations of CH (2800-3000cm-1) and OH
(3100-3700cm-1) are presented for different
UHDs of drugs and their aqueous ethanol
control. Fig. 1 shows the spectra of Sulph
30cH and ethanol control, and Fig. 2 Sulph
200cH and 1000cH. In all cases, CH bands of
ethanol have distinct sharp peaks and OH
bands of ethanol and water broad peaks
(Figs.1, 2). The peaks of CH and OH bands of
the drug (Sulph 30cH) and the control and
also of Sulph 200cH and 1000cH with the
same ethanol content 25% show variation in
intensities.
Fig.-1: Raman spectra of Sulph 30cH and aqueous
ethanol control, both in 25% ethanol in the region
of CH and OH stretching vibration.
Fig.-2: Raman spectra of Sulph 200cH and 1000cH
in 25% ethanol in the region of CH and OH
stretching vibration.
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
5
Intensity Ratio: The intensity ratios R1 and
R2 for control, Sulph 30cH and Nat-m 30cH in
25% ethanol show marked difference from
each other (Figs 3, 4). The ratio values rise
gradually with Sulph 30cH at the bottom and
Nat-m 30cH at the top with the control lying
close to Sulph (Figs.3, 4).
Fig.-3: Intensity ratio I3200/I3420 showing the
difference in Control, Sulph 30cH and Nat-m 30cH.
All in 25% ethanol.
Fig.-4: Intensity ratio I36 20/I3420 showing the
difference in control, Sulph 30cH and Nat–m 30cH.
All in 25% ethanol.
The intensity ratio R1 for control, Sulph 30cH,
Sulph 200cH and Sulph 1000cH is inversely
related to the UHD ranks (Fig.5). The position
of the control is slightly lower than that of
Sulph 30cH (Fig.5).
Fig.-5: Intensity ratio I3200/I3420 showing negative
relation in three potencies of Sulph All in 25%
ethanol.
The intensity ratio R2 for control and three
different UHDs of Sulph rises gradually with
the increase in UHD ranks from the 30th to the
1000th (Fig.6).
Fig.-6: Intensity ratio I3620/I3420 showing positive
relation in three potencies of Sulph. All in 25%
ethanol.
The control lies slightly above Sulph 30cH.
Like Sulph, intensity ratio R1 shows a
negative relation between the three UHD
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
6
ranks of Nat-m (Fig. 7). The ratio R2 shows a
positive relation with three UHD ranks of
Nat–m (Fig.8) as in Sulph.
Fig.-7: Intensity ratio I3200/I3420 showing negative
relation in three potencies of Nat-m. All in 25%
ethanol. The position of the intensity ratio of the
control is at 1.09.
Fig.-8: Intensity ratio I3620/I3420 showing positive
relation in three potencies of Nat-m. All in 25%
ethanol. The position of the intensity ratio of the
control is at 0.06.
Discussion
The amplitudes of CH and OH stretching
bands increase with the increase in ethanol
content in aqueous ethanol solutions13. In our
study, the amplitudes of CH and OH
stretching bands vary between the control
and the drugs (Fig.1) and in different UHD
ranks of the same drug (Fig. 2) in spite of the
fact that ethanol content is same (25%) in all
the samples. The difference in hydrogen bond
and in bond strength may be responsible for
this.
Intensity Ratio: The intensity ratio R1 is
maximum at 20-25% ethanol concentration
indicating strongest hydrogen bonding of OH
groups of water and ethanol12,13. At this
concentration of ethanol, there occurs
structural rearrangement leading to
stabilization and strengthening of water
structure by ethanol molecules, and
strengthening of hydrogen bonds between
OH groups13.
The ratio R2 decreases as ethanol
concentration increases in water-ethanol
solutions13. The authors hypothesize that
with higher ethanol concentration free OH
groups, not linked with a hydrogen bond,
decreases both in water and ethanol as the
ethanol content increases13. But in our study
Nat-m 30cH has strong hydrogen bond and
maximum free OH groups followed by Sulph
30cH (Figs 3,4). Control is close to Sulph.
Thus, we see that in 25% ethanol the drug,
which has the strongest hydrogen bonding of
the OH groups, also has a maximum number
of free OH groups. Judged from the clinical
perspective Nat-m is a deep and long-acting
drug14,15. Although control and Sulph are close
to each other with respect to the free OH
groups, the latter has stronger hydrogen
bonding of OH groups than the control
(Fig.3). This makes Sulph an effective drug
distinct from the control. It may be
mentioned here that UHDs of aqueous
ethanol control also has some biological effect
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
7
which could be reduced or eliminated by
dilution with water 1:100016.
In the case of the three UHD ranks of Sulph
and Nat-m, the highest rank 1000cH occupies
the lowest position while the lowest rank 30th
the highest position as evidenced by the ratio
R1 (Figs. 5,7). It means the lower is the rank
the stronger is the H-bond of the OH groups.
But as per the ratio R2, the higher is the rank
the more abundant is the free OH groups
(Figs 6, 8). In homeopathy, the higher is the
UHD rank of a drug the deeper is its
therapeutic effect. For Sulph as well as Nat-m
the deeper efficacy depends more on the free
OH groups rather than on the hydrogen bond
strength of the OH groups. Or, it may depend
on both the factors taken together.
Why do hydrogen bond strength and free OH
groups vary in different UHDs although their
ethanol content is same? The answer lies in
the method of preparation of HD drugs. The
method involves successive dilution of a
mother tincture or a starting material and
mechanical agitation1. Therefore, these two
factors may contribute to the variation in H-
bond strength and free OH groups in UHDs. It
is known that mechanical agitation or
sonication could change the solution
structure in aqueous ethanol, and this change
could produce a biological effect. Haseba et
al17 observed that weak ultra-sonication of
aqueous ethanol solution accelerates the
thermal motion of water molecules in the
solution. This acceleration disperses ethanol
molecules amongst water molecules making
the solution more compact and homogeneous
as compared to the non-sonicated solution.
The authors further observed that sonicated
aqueous ethanol behaves like a mature spirit
being tastier and less toxic than ordinary
alcohol. This means that different UHDs of
drugs might have acquired different levels of
compactness and homogeneity of water
molecules due to different degrees of
mechanical agitation applied. Sonication,
instead of succussion, also makes an effective
UHD1. Therefore, we can say that three
factors like hydrogen bond strength, free OH
groups and compactness cum homogeneity of
water molecules together make an effective
UHD with specificity.
Conclusion
The intensity ratio R1 provides information
about the relative number of OH groups with
strong and weak hydrogen bonds. The ratio
R2 suggests the relative number of OH groups
with broken and weak hydrogen bonds.
Judged from R1 values the lower is the UHD
rank, the stronger is the H-bond of the OH
groups. In the light of R2 values, the higher is
the UHD rank the more abundant is the free
OH groups. So, hydrogen bond strength and
free OH groups together make an effective
UHD relating to Sulphur and Natrum
muriaticum.
Acknowledgements
T.S. and A.K. duly thank Dr. Bholanath
Chakravarty Memorial Trust for providing
research fellowship during the tenure of
work.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
1. Sukul NC, Sukul A. High dilution effects:
physical and biochemical basis. Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004.
2. Sukul NC, Ghosh S, Sinhababu SP, Sukul A.
Strychnos mux vomica extract and its
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
8
ultra-high dilutions reduce voluntary
ethanol intake in rats. J. Altern
Complement Med 2001; 7:187-193.
3. Sukul NC, Ghosh S, Sukul A, Sinhababu SP.
Variation in Fourier Transform Infrared
spectra of some homeopathic potencies
and their diluent media. J Altern
Complement Med 2005;11:807-812.
4. Walach H, Jonas W B, Ives J, Wijk R Van,
Weingartner O. Research on homeopathy:
state of the art. J Altern Complement Med
2005; 11:813-829.
5. Rao M L, Roy R, Bell IR, Hoover R. The
defining role of structure (including
epitaxy) in the plausibility of homeopathy.
Homeopathy 2007; 96(3):175-182.
6. Baumgartner S, Wolf M, Skrabal P,
Bangerter F, Heusser P, Thurneysen A,
Wolf U. High field 1HT(1) and T(2) NMR
relaxation time measurements of H2O in
homeopathic preparations of quartz,
sulfur, and copper sulfate.
Naturwissenschaften 2009;96 : 1079-
1089.
7. Klein S D, Sandig A, Baumgartner S.
Differences in median ultraviolet light
transmission of serial homeopathic
dilutions of copper sulphate, Hypericum
perforatum and Sulphur. Evidence-based
complement Altern Med 2013; Article ID
370609, 11 pages.
8. Chakraborty I, Datta S, Sukul A,
Chakravorty R, Sukul N C. Variation in free
and bound water molecules in different
homeopathic potencies as revealed by
their Fourier Transform Infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR). Int J. High Dilution
Res 2014; 13:189-196.
9. Coates J. Interpretation of infrared
spectra, a practical approach. In
Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Joh.
Wiley and Sons 2000; Pp.10815-10837.
10. Banwell C, Mc Cash E. Fundamentals of
Molecular Spectroscopy, Fourth Edn.
England: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company
1994.
11. Farrington E.A. A clinical Materia Medica:
Revised and enlarged by H Farrington
1928.
12. Burikov S, Dolenko T, Patsaeva S,
Starokurov Y, Yuzhakov V. Raman and IR
spectroscopy research on hydrogen
bonding in water-ethanol systems.
Molecular Physics 2010;108: 2427-2436.
13. Dolenko T. A, Burikov S A, Patsaeva S V,
Yuzhakov V I. Manifestation of hydrogen
bonds of aqueous ethanol solutions in the
Raman scattering spectra. Quantum
Electronics 2011;41:267-272.
14. Boericke W, 1927. Pocket Manual of
Homeopathic Materia Medica. Indian
edn.(1976), Sett Dey, Calcutta 1976; Pp.
459-462.
15. Kent J.T., 1911. Homeopathic Materia
Medica. Indian edn., Sett Dey, Calcutta
1962; Pp. 712-719.
16. Sukul S, Mondal S, Sukul NC. Sepia 200CH
in 1:1000 dilution counteracts the effect of
salt stress in cowpea seedlings but vehicle
90% ethanol proves ineffective in the same
dilution. Int J High Dilution Res 2012;
11:237-246.
17. Haseba T, Matsushita K, Asakura T,
Kameyama K, Tamaki T, Okouchi S,
Watanabe T, Vedaira H. Diminution of
biological reactivity of ethanol by changing
the solution structure by weak
ultrasonication. Alcoholism Clin. Exp. Res
1993; 17 : 963-7.
International Journal of High Dilution Research 2016; 15(1):2-9
Available online at www.highdilution.org
Cite as: Sarkar T, Konar A, Sukul NC, Majumdar D, Singha A, Sukul A. Raman spectroscopy shows difference in drugs at
ultra-high dilution prepared with stepwise mechanical agitation. Int J High Dilution Res. 2016;15(1): 2-9.
9
Received: Dec 28, 2015. Accepted: March 10, 2016.
© International Journal of High Dilution Research.
Not for commercial purposes.