In this essay we argue for a privileged relationship between the imaginary structure of the theatrical event and the imaginary structure of human subjectivity. We will examine in detail three examples of the considerable body of recent British drama which has been expressly concerned with political issues, in the light of Laplanche and Pontalis’s work in refining Freud’s ideas about Fantasy.1 As well as David Hare’s Plenty (staged 1978), Trevor Griffiths’s Occupations (staged 1970), and Howard Brenton’s Greenland (staged 1988), which all explore the relationship between what have been traditionally conceived of as discrete areas of human activity (the personal and the political), we will also refer briefly to a number of other works both by these writers and also by others such as Howard Barker, Caryl Churchill and David Edgar which address similar issues.2 Drawing on Laplanche and Pontalis we will read contemporary political theatre in the light of two linked themes: firstly, that all fantasies (those of the artist as much as those of the dreamer) are structurally dependent upon the organisation of fantasy described by Freud as the primal fantasies, and, secondly, that these fantasies are erotic and are organised through sexuality and sexual difference. In applying psychoanalytic thought to the question of theatrical representation we will offer an account of that ‘other’ scene which both lies behind and also organises the theatrical representation itself.