ArticlePDF Available

Global Demand for Food Is Rising. Can We Meet It?



Over the last century, the global population has quadrupled. In 1915, there were 1.8 billion people in the world. Today, according to the most recent estimate by the UN, there are 7.3 billion people — and we may reach 9.7 billion by 2050. This growth, along with rising incomes in developing countries (which cause dietary changes such as eating more protein and meat) are driving up global food demand.
Global Demand for Food Is
Rising. Can We Meet It?
by Maarten Elferink and Florian Schierhorn
APRIL 07, 2016
Over the last century, the global population has quadrupled. In 1915, there were 1.8 billion
people in the world. Today, according to the most recent estimate by the UN, there are 7.3
billion people —and we may reach 9.7 billion by 2050. This growth, along with rising
incomes in developing countries (which cause dietary changes such as eating more protein
and meat) are driving up global food demand.
Food demand is expected to increase anywhere between 59% to 98% by 2050. This will
shape agricultural markets in ways we have not seen before. Farmers worldwide will need
to increase crop production, either by increasing the amount of agricultural land to grow
crops or by enhancing productivity on existing agricultural lands through fertilizer and
irrigation and adopting new methods like precision farming.
However, the ecological and social trade-offs of clearing more land for agriculture are often
high, particularly in the tropics. And right now, crop yields —the amount of crops
harvested per unit of land cultivated —aregrowing too slowly to meet the forecasted
demand for food.
Many other factors, from climate change to urbanization to a lack of investment, will also
make it challenging to produce enough food. There is strong academic consensus that
climate change–driven water scarcity, rising global temperatures, and extreme weather will
have severe long-term effects on crop yields. These are expected to impact many major
agricultural regions, especially those close to the Equator. For example, the Brazilian state
of Mato Grosso, one of the most important agricultural regions worldwide, may face an
18% to 23% reduction in soy and corn output by 2050, due to climate change. The
Midwestern U.S. and Eastern Australia — two other globally important regions — may also
see a substantial decline in agricultural output due to extreme heat.
Yet some places are expected to (initially) benefit from climate change. Countries stretching
over northern latitudes — mainly China, Canada, and Russia —are forecasted to experience
longer and warmer growing seasons in certain areas. Russia, which is already a major grain
exporter, has huge untapped production potential because of large crop yield gaps (the
difference between current and potential yields under current conditions) and widespread
abandoned farmland (more than 40 million hectares, an area larger than Germany)
following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, in 1991. The country arguably has the most
agricultural opportunity in the world, but institutional reform and significant investments
in agriculture and rural infrastructure will be needed to realize it.
Advanced logistics, transportation, storage, and processing are also crucial for making sure
that food goes from where it grows in abundance to where it doesn’t. This is where soft
commodity trading companies, such as Cargill, Louis Dreyfus, or COFCO, come in. While
Big Food companies such as General Mills or Unilever have tremendous global influence on
what people eat, trading companies have a much greater impact on food security, because
they source and distribute our staple foods and the ingredients used by Big Food,from rice,
wheat, corn, and sugar to soybean and oil palm. They also store periodically produced
grains and oilseeds so that they can be consumed all year, and they process soft
commodities so that they can be used further down the value chain. For example, wheat
needs to be milled into flour to produce bread or noodles, and soybeans must be crushed to
produce oil or feed for livestock.
Nonetheless, even if some regions increase their output and traders reduce the mismatch
between supply and demand, doubling food production by 2050 will undeniably be a
major challenge. Businesses and governments will have to work together to increase
productivity, encourage innovation, and improve integration in supply chains toward a
sustainable global food balance.
First and foremost, farmers, trading companies, and other processing groups (Big Food in
particular) need to commit to deforestation-free supply chains. Deforestation causes rapid
and irreversible losses of biodiversity, is the second largest source of carbon dioxide
emissions after fossil fuels, and has contributed greatly to global warming—adding to the
negative pressure on agriculture production for which these forests were cleared in the first
Farmers must also grow more on the land they currently operate through what is called
“sustainable intensification.” This means using precision farming tools, such as GPS
fertilizer dispersion, advanced irrigation systems, and environmentally optimized crop
rotations. These methods can help produce more crops, especially in parts of Africa, Latin
America, and Eastern Europe with large yield gaps. They can also reduce the negative
environmental impacts from over-stressing resources–preventing groundwater depletion
and the destruction of fertile lands through over-use of fertilizer.
The agricultural sector also needs significant long-term private investment and public
spending. Many large institutional investors, including pension funds and sovereign wealth
funds, have already made major commitments to support global agricultural production
and trading in recent years—not least because agricultural (land) investments have
historically delivered strong returns, increased diversification, and outpaced inflation.
Still, investment in agriculture in most developing countries has declined over the last 30
years and much less is spent on R&D compared to developed countries—resulting in low
productivity and stagnant production. And because banking sectors in developing
countries give fewer loans to farmers (compared to the share of agriculture in GDP),
investments by both farmers and large corporations are still limited. To attract more
financing and investment in agriculture, the risks need to be reduced by governments.
Regulators need to overhaul policies that limit inclusion of small, rural farmers into the
financial system— for example, soft loans (i.e., lending that is more generous than market
lending) and interest rate caps discourage bank lending. More supportive policies, laws,
and public spending on infrastructure would help create a favorable investment climate for
Global policy makers, corporations, and consumers must put the global food balance
higher up the agenda. International business leaders who are participating in this supply
chain have to better communicate the need for policy changes and for developed countries
to incentivize investment in regions where there is the most potential for growth. Our food
security will depend on it.
Maarten Elferink is the founder and Managing Director of Vosbor, an Amsterdam based commodity
service and solutions provider dedicated to sustainability, originating soft commodities and derivative products
selectively in Eastern Europe and the FSU for distribution in the Asia-Pacific region.
Florian Schierhorn
Florian Schierhorn is a post-doctoral researcher at the Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in
Transition Economies in Halle, Germany and was selected for participation in the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting
on Economic Sciences in 2014. His overall research relates to the question of how to meet global food security
without increasing pressure on land.
This article is about GOVERNMENT
Leave a Comment
One important factor not mentioned - food waste. Conservative estimates indicate Western households
throw out 20 - 30% of purchased food for fairly dubious reasons - let alone the tonnes of food discarded by
restaurants etc. Food was a precious commodity in times past when the effort required to obtain it was far
greater than now. Plenty of 'low hanging fruit' there.
We hope the conversations that take place on will be energetic, constructive, and thought-provoking. To comment, readers must
sign in or register. And to ensure the quality of the discussion, our moderating team will review all comments and may edit them for clarity,
length, and relevance. Comments that are overly promotional, mean-spirited, or off-topic may be deleted per the moderators' judgment.
All postings become the property of Harvard Business Publishing.
... This was followed by the integration of various modern technologies such as sensors, geolocation systems, computer programs, etc., which aimed to calculate ideal quantities, ideal time frames and ideal locations regarding the application of agricultural and livestock products and practices, and continues today with the integration of state-of-the-art technologies, such as the Internet of Things, Big Data, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence and so on [5], with the ultimate goal being to increase productivity in a sustainable way. And although there is currently a balance between demand and supply, the increased needs that will arise in the near future, combined with the finite available resources, pose a great challenge for the future [6]. ...
Full-text available
Food production faces significant challenges, mainly due to the increase in the Earth’s population, combined with climate change. This will create extreme pressure on food industries, which will have to respond to the demand while protecting the environment and ensuring high food quality. It is, therefore, imperative to adopt innovative technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence, in order to aid in this cause. To do this, we first need to understand the adoption process that enables the deployment of those technologies. Therefore, this research attempts to identify the factors that encourage and discourage the adoption of Artificial Intelligence technologies by professionals working in the fields of agriculture, livestock farming and aquaculture, by examining the available literature on the subject. This is a systematic literature review that follows the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The research was conducted on 38 articles selected from a pool of 225 relevant articles, and led to the identification of 20 factors that encourage and 21 factors that discourage the adoption of Artificial Intelligence. The factors that appeared most were of economic nature regarding discouragement (31.5%) and product-related regarding encouragement (28.1%). This research does not aim to quantify the importance of each factor—since more original research becoming available is needed for that—but mainly to construct a list of factors, using spreadsheets, which could then be used to guide further future research towards understanding the adoption mechanism.
... El rendimiento atractivo de la IA la ha convertido en una herramienta muy favorable para aplicar en industrias, incluida la toma de decisiones y la estimación de procesos con la intención de reducir los costos generales, mejorar la calidad y la rentabilidad [4]. A medida que la población en el mundo ha ido creciendo, se estima que la demanda de alimentos aumente del 59% al 98% para 2050 [5]. Por lo tanto, para satisfacer esta demanda, se ha aplicado IA, en la gestión de la cadena de suministro, la clasificación de alimentos, la realización de la producción, la mejora de la calidad y la higiene industrial [6,7,8]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
RESUMEN. La inteligencia artificial (IA) se ha convertido en la tecnología de vanguardia más recientemente incorporada en la industria alimentaria debido al aumento en la demanda de alimentos en línea, por el incremento de la población mundial y a las restricciones de toda índole que debe cumplir. La capacidad demostrada de los sistemas inteligentes en diversas tareas, como la determinación de la calidad de los alimentos, las herramientas de control, la clasificación de los alimentos y la predicción ha intensificado su demanda. En este artículo se revisan diversas tecnologías con el fin de mostrar sus ventajas, limitaciones y formulaciones. Se menciona en particular la integración de estos sistemas con dispositivos inteligentes como la nariz electrónica, la lengua electrónica, sistemas de visión por computadora y la espectroscopia de infrarrojo cercano (NIR), todo lo cual beneficia tanto a los actores de la industria como a los consumidores. ABSTRACT. Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the most recently incorporated cutting-edge technology in the food industry due to the increase in demand for food online, due to the increase in the world population and the restrictions of all kinds that it must comply with. The proven ability of intelligent systems in various tasks such as food quality determination, control tools, food classification and prediction has intensified their demand. In this article various technologies are reviewed to show their advantages, limitations, and formulations. Mention is made of the integration of these systems with smart devices such as the electronic nose, the electronic tongue, computer vision systems and near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, all of which benefit both industry players and consumers. consumers. INTRODUCCIÓN El presente artículo tiene la intención de mostrar un panorama general del potencial que tiene la Inteligencia Artificial en su aprovechamiento en la Industria Alimentaria. Es en este sentido una revisión del área a "ojo de pájaro", que puede servir como puerta de entrada a la literatura especializada y detallada, sin mayores pretensiones que la de ilustrar el abanico de posibilidades, que se puede palpar en las referencias. La industria del entretenimiento, el pronóstico del clima, la industria de manufactura, alimentaria, la médica, la minería de datos, y la representación del conocimiento se encuentran entre las áreas que han estado utilizando métodos de IA [2,3]. La IA tiene una variedad de algoritmos para elegir, como el aprendizaje por refuerzo, los sistemas expertos, la lógica difusa (FL), la inteligencia de enjambre, las redes neuronales artificiales (ANN) y la programación lógica [1]. El rendimiento atractivo de la IA la ha convertido en una herramienta muy favorable para aplicar en industrias, incluida la toma de decisiones y la estimación de procesos con la intención de reducir los costos generales, mejorar la calidad y la rentabilidad [4]. A medida que la población en el mundo ha ido creciendo, se estima que la demanda de alimentos aumente del 59% al 98% para 2050 [5]. Por lo tanto, para satisfacer esta demanda, se ha aplicado IA, en la gestión de la cadena de suministro, la clasificación de alimentos, la realización de la producción, la mejora de la calidad y la higiene industrial [6,7,8]. Por ejemplo, ANN se ha utilizado para ayudar a la resolución de problemas complejos reales en la industria alimentaria [9], así como en la clasificación y predicción de parámetros por resultar más simple, lo que ha conducido a una mayor demanda [10]. Además, FL y ANN se han usado tradicionalmente como controladores para garantizar la seguridad alimentaria, el control de calidad, la reducción de los costos y el aumento del rendimiento de la producción [11,12]. Este documento está organizado de la siguiente manera. Se presenta una introducción de la IA en la primera sección seguida de la aplicación de diferentes tipos de IA en la industria alimentaria. A continuación, se ilustra la fusión de la IA con lo externo en la industria alimentaria Finalmente, se discute una breve conclusión. IA EN LA INDUSTRIA ALIMENTARIA La aplicación de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) en la industria alimentaria ha ido creciendo durante años en el control de calidad, la clasificación de alimentos, la clasificación y predicción de parámetros, y la seguridad alimentaria. Los
... With the global population rapidly increasing and food consumption projected to surge, effective nitrogen management is critical to boost crop yields, protect soil quality, and mitigate environmental challenges such as water pollution and climate change [1,2]. Precision fertilization, involving optimized timing, methods, fertilizer selection, and sound cultivation practices, significantly improves nitrogen fertilizer efficiency [3]. ...
Full-text available
Conservation tillage and deep-side fertilization both hold the potential to reduce nitrogen leaching and improve grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in fragrant rice cultivation practices. However, the combined impact of different tillage practices with deep-side fertilization on nitrogen leaching remains uncertain. Therefore, this study conducted on-site experiments for four rice-growing seasons in both early and late seasons in 2018 and 2019 using the fragrant rice varieties “Meixiangzhan 2” (MX) and “Xiangyaxiangzhan” (XY). The four experimental treatments included the following: conventional tillage with regular fertilization (T1), conventional tillage with simultaneous deep fertilization (T2), reduced tillage with simultaneous deep fertilization (T3), and no-tillage with simultaneous deep fertilization (T4). Our results indicate that the T4 treatment exhibited higher nitrogen leaching rates and potential nitrogen losses throughout the entire rice growth cycle, with a 4.51% increase in total mineral nitrogen leaching (TMNL) and a 1.86% increase in potential nitrogen leaching compared to T1 treatment. In contrast, the T2 treatment demonstrated the lowest nitrogen leaching rate, resulting in a 6.01% reduction in TMNL and a 9.57% decrease in potential nitrogen leaching compared to T1, demonstrating the most optimal performance. It is important to note that a reduction in nitrogen leaching does not directly translate into an increase in rice yield. Our study involved the cultivation of two fragrant rice varieties, ‘Meixiangzhan2’ (MX) and ‘Xiangyaxiangzhan’ (XY), and the results revealed some interesting insights. For MX, the T1 treatment resulted in lower daily grain outputs compared to the other treatments, with disparities ranging from 5.35% to 9.94%. Similarly, for XY, the T1 treatment yielded significantly lower daily grain outputs compared to the other treatments, with discrepancies ranging from 6.26% to 10.81% during the late season of 2019. Therefore, this study suggests that conventional tillage combined with deep fertilizer application can be considered as an effective agricultural strategy to reduce nitrogen leaching and enhance fragrant rice yields.
... The poultry industry is recognized for its efficiency in utilizing natural resources to meet the increasing demand for protein and food, projected to rise by 59% to 98% by 2050 (Elferink and Schierhorn 2016). Consequently, global poultry demand is projected to grow by 121% during the same period (Alexandratos and Bruinsma 2012). ...
Full-text available
Limited information exists on the use of zinc-l-selenomethionine (Zn-L-SeMet) in broiler diets and its effects on the growth performance, body temperature, mortality rates, blood profile, and gene expression, especially when animals are reared under cyclic heat stress conditions. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Zn-L-SeMet in broiler diets from 1 to 42 days of age reared under cyclic heat stress and its effects on growth performance, cloacal temperatures, mortality rate, blood parameters, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene expression in the breast muscle. A total of 1000 male Cobb 500® broiler chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments: 0, 0.15, 0.23, 0.47, and 1.30 mg/kg of Zn-L-SeMet. Each treatment consisted of 10 replicates with 20 birds each. No statistically significant differences in growth performance were observed from 1 to 21 days of age (P > 0.05). However, from 1 to 42 days, feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) decreased linearly (P < 0.05). Cloacal temperatures showed no significant effects (P > 0.05), while overall mortality rate exhibited a quadratic response (P < 0.05), with the optimal inclusion level predicted to reduce broiler mortality at 0.71 mg/kg. Triglyceride (TRG) levels increased with 0.97 mg/kg (P < 0.05), and gama-glutamil transferase (GGT) levels decreased with the inclusion of 1.19 mg/kg (P < 0.05). No significant effects on IGF-1 and GHR gene expression were found (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the inclusion of 1.30 mg/kg of Zn-L-SeMet in diets of heat-stressed broilers improved growth performance from 1 to 42 days of age. An inclusion of 0.71 mg/kg reduced mortality rate, while 0.97 mg and 1.19 mg increased and reduced TRG and GGT levels, respectively.
Full-text available
Introduction High crop productivity has the potential to improve the food and nutrition security status of not only smallholder farmers but also households in general. However, smallholder farmers operate in a dynamic environment whereby their crop production is affected by various factors that hinder it from lessening food insecurity and malnutrition in rural areas. The study investigated the determinants of crop productivity and its effect on household food and nutrition security status in South Africa. Methods This study employed a quantitative research method. A total of 1520 households were selected using the multi-stage stratified random sampling technique. Out of the total sample size of 1520, 386 were crop producers, 176 producers were from Mpumalanga province, and 210 producers were from the Limpopo province. Results and discussion Most of the smallholder farmers do not have access to the irrigation system, mechanization, and agricultural inputs. The Household Food Insecurity Access Scale showed that most smallholder farmers were food insecure, with 78% of the farmers in each province found to be food insecure. The results from Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) showed that in the overall sampled population, 50% of smallholder farmers had highly diverse diets. Only 50% of the smallholder farmers had high dietary diversity in each province. Irrigation systems and involvement in crop production had a positive influence on the crop productivity of smallholder farmers. The results from the Conditional Mixed Process (CMP) model showed that ownership of livestock, harvest, and disability in the family negatively impacted smallholder farmers’ food security status while household size had a positive effect on the food security of smallholder farmers. The results also showed that social grants, agricultural assistance, and harvest had a negative impact on the nutrition status of smallholder farmers. While household size had a positive impact on the nutrition status of smallholder farmers. Conclusion and recommendations Factors such as irrigation systems and involvement in crop production influenced crop productivity. Household size influenced the nutritional status of smallholder farmers while harvest size affected the food security status. There is a need to encourage more households to get involved in farming. Government and nongovernmental organizations need to support smallholder farmers with agricultural productive resources like irrigation systems to improve their crop productivity.
Full-text available
The adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Ghana has raised a lot of public concerns and mixed feelings among some Ghanaians. Our present study, therefore, explored the current knowledge of the general public on GMOs, their perceptions, and factors that influence their understanding of GMOs. A total of 200 Ghanaians were interviewed using an online semi-structured questionnaire to solicit information on their knowledge of GMOs. The findings of the study showed that most Ghanaians (183 out of 200) are aware of GMOs. Age and level of education significantly influenced consumers’ awareness of GMOs. The results also revealed that most of the participants have a medium to a high level of knowledge of GMOs; however, limited information about GMOs is available to the public. About 61% of the respondents are willing to consume GMOs when made available in Ghana. Also, the findings of the study showed that the respondents would prefer GM-labelled products. The educational level of the respondents significantly influenced their knowledge and understanding of GMOs. The study recommends that scientists and various media platforms provide a platform to address the concerns of the public on GMOs and occasionally engage them in GMO-related issues and their role in addressing food insecurity and malnutrition.
The food industry is one of the most rapidly evolving sectors, with new technological advancements constantly emerging. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a crucial component in this industry, revolutionizing various aspects of food production, from recipe generation to quality control. In recent years, AI has been integrated into the food industry in a big way, and its impact on the industry has been profound. An important benefit of AI in the food industry is its capacity to automate monotonous tasks, freeing up human workers for more complex responsibilities. AI also aids in recipe generation, enabling food companies to create innovative products that cater to consumer preferences. Moreover, AI plays a crucial role in maintaining quality control, guaranteeing that food products adhere to safety and quality requirements before they are delivered to consumers. To provide insights into the impact of AI in the food industry, this chapter will present case studies highlighting successful AI implementations.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.